Significance
Calmodulin is essential to life in all eukaryotic cells and serves as a popular model for ion binding and activation in proteins. Calmodulin transduces complex calcium signals and acts on hundreds of effector proteins, but the sensitivity and complexity of this process make it difficult to characterize. Much work uses lanthanides as luminescent calcium substitutes to study ion binding and activation in calmodulin and other proteins. Using ultrafast 2D IR spectroscopy, we show that lanthanide ions perturb the finely tuned structure and dynamics of calmodulin’s binding sites. The temporal and spatial resolution of our measurements opens a new window into the study of protein−ion binding and demonstrates that seemingly innocuous ligand substitutions can significantly alter protein conformation.
Keywords: calmodulin, lanthanide, EF hand, 2D IR, FTIR
Abstract
The Ca2+-sensing protein calmodulin (CaM) is a popular model of biological ion binding since it is both experimentally tractable and essential to survival in all eukaryotic cells. CaM modulates hundreds of target proteins and is sensitive to complex patterns of Ca2+ exposure, indicating that it functions as a sophisticated dynamic transducer rather than a simple on/off switch. Many details of this transduction function are not well understood. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, ultrafast 2D infrared (2D IR) spectroscopy, and electronic structure calculations were used to probe interactions between bound metal ions (Ca2+ and several trivalent lanthanide ions) and the carboxylate groups in CaM’s EF-hand ion-coordinating sites. Since Tb3+ is commonly used as a luminescent Ca2+ analog in studies of protein−ion binding, it is important to characterize distinctions between the coordination of Ca2+ and the lanthanides in CaM. Although functional assays indicate that Tb3+ fully activates many Ca2+-dependent proteins, our FTIR spectra indicate that Tb3+, La3+, and Lu3+ disrupt the bidentate coordination geometry characteristic of the CaM binding sites’ strongly conserved position 12 glutamate residue. The 2D IR spectra indicate that, relative to the Ca2+-bound form, lanthanide-bound CaM exhibits greater conformational flexibility and larger structural fluctuations within its binding sites. Time-dependent 2D IR lineshapes indicate that binding sites in Ca2+−CaM occupy well-defined configurations, whereas binding sites in lanthanide-bound-CaM are more disordered. Overall, the results show that binding to lanthanide ions significantly alters the conformation and dynamics of CaM’s binding sites.
Calmodulin (CaM) is the major calcium-sensing protein in eukaryotic cells (1–5). CaM has one of the mostly highly conserved sequences of any protein (6), shows remarkable conformational flexibility, and regulates hundreds of effectors (7). For example, most of the modulatory effects of Ca2+ on ion channel proteins are mediated by CaM (8, 9). It is essential to a variety of cellular functions, including cell growth, synaptic transmission, motor control, secretion, and differentiation, among others (3–5, 10–14). Due to its importance, stability, and small size (148 residues), CaM is commonly used as a model protein in studies of ion binding (3, 15).
Ca2+ Sensing and Coordination Geometry in CaM
Ca2+ binding in CaM exposes a core of buried hydrophobic surfaces through which CaM interacts and controls over 300 target proteins (16–22). CaM is highly sensitive to Ca2+ and modulates protein function differently in response to variations in the timing and amplitude of intracellular Ca2+ signals (3, 23). Rather than operating as a two-state on/off switch, CaM functions as an intricate molecular transducer that must transition through an ensemble of distinct but interrelated conformations to modulate a wide range of effector proteins. In such a finely balanced and sensitive system, even small structural perturbations at the ion binding sites may be amplified into global changes in conformation that alter target recognition and selectivity, or the efficacy of target activation by CaM. Since the signals encoded by CaM are highly time-dependent, conformational distortions that alter the dynamics of ion capture and release by CaM’s binding sites are particularly important.
CaM coordinates Ca2+ via four similar but unique EF-hand binding sites (Fig. 1), which are helix–loop–helix structural domains found in a large family of Ca2+-binding proteins (24, 25). The EF-hand sites in CaM coordinate Ca2+ in a pentagonal bipyramidal geometry. In all four binding sites, a coordinating water, a backbone amide C=O group, a bidentate glutamate carboxylate group, and two monodentate aspartate carboxylate groups occupy six of the binding positions. In two of the binding sites, the last position is occupied by a third monodentate aspartate carboxylate group. In the other two sites, the last position is occupied by an asparagine side-chain C=O.
Although the sequences of CaM’s four EF-hand binding sites differ from one another (Fig. 2), the aspartate and glutamate residues at positions 1 and 12 are present in all four binding sites and are highly conserved across species (6) and in other EF-hand proteins (26). The position 12 glutamate residue is of special interest since it alone coordinates ions in bidentate geometry (27, 28). All other coordination participants bind through one oxygen atom in monodentate or pseudobridging geometry (Figs. 1 and 2).
Despite extensive investigations by many laboratories into Ca2+ sensing and signaling by CaM, quantitative understanding of the energetic and structural effects of metal ion binding on CaM function is incomplete. For example, recent work has shown that estimates of thermodynamic parameters for Ca2+ binding to CaM are neither accurate nor unique when constrained by fitting typical binding data, due to effective compensations between the parameters (29–32). In fact, the parameter uncertainties are so large that the published binding studies provide almost no information on site affinities or cooperative interactions in CaM. Similarly, the complete sequence of structural changes starting with Ca2+ binding to the EF hands and proceeding to CaM core exposure is not known (33–35).
Probing Ion-Dependent Binding Conformations with Infrared Spectroscopy
Carboxylate and amide carbonyl C=O stretching frequencies are highly sensitive to changes in their electrostatic and molecular environments and report structural perturbations with angstrom-level spatial sensitivity and subpicosecond temporal precision (36–38). Similarly, the C=O stretching vibrations of carbonyl groups arranged along the protein backbone, termed amide I vibrations, report on changes to global protein conformation. These vibrations can be probed with infrared spectroscopy to reveal small changes in the dynamics of CaM’s binding sites and global structure. For example, our measurements of EDTA spectroscopic shifts attending the coordination of different ions indicate that infrared spectroscopy can easily detect changes in metal ion coordination radius of less than 0.1 Å (Frequency Assignment of EDTA Spectral Features, Fig. S1, and Table S1), whereas NMR and X-ray crystal structures routinely report uncertainties more than 10 times greater (39, 40).
Infrared spectroscopy is thus an ideal method for study of both structural and dynamic aspects of CaM function. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy has long been applied to questions of protein structure, in general (41, 42), and ion coordination by CaM and other proteins (43–47). However, FTIR spectroscopy lacks the time resolution necessary to probe dynamic biological processes such as ion sensing.
Ultrafast 2D infrared (2D IR) spectroscopy has helped map fast protein dynamics that have remained opaque to other experimental methods (48–61), and has recently been used to measure temperature-mediated changes in the secondary structure of apo-CaM and Ca2+−CaM (62). Our 2D IR spectrometer is described in detail in Two-Dimensional IR Spectrometer and Fig. S2, as are our methods for analyzing 2D IR data (Two-Dimensional IR Data Collection and Analysis and Fig. S3). The infrared analog of 2D NMR, 2D IR spectroscopy uses midinfrared laser pulses to measure a sample’s infrared absorption spectrum after it has been irradiated by a pair of excitation pulses. In this way, 2D IR spreads spectral information over two frequency axes and allows for interrogation of fast relaxation, energy exchange (61, 63–65), and conformational changes in proteins (66, 67). Additionally, 2D IR’s subpicosecond time resolution is sufficient to probe even the fastest structural rearrangements in biomolecules. Thus, 2D IR spectroscopy offers several advantages over conventional IR absorption spectroscopy, including greater time resolution, the ability to observe energy transfer between a molecule’s vibrational modes, and the capacity to resolve the orientation of molecular vibrations (68, 69).
Here, we use FTIR and 2D IR spectroscopy to study coordination of Ca2+ and three trivalent lanthanide ions (La3+, Tb3+, and Lu3+, collectively abbreviated as Ln3+) by CaM. Together, FTIR and 2D IR provide the subangstrom spatial resolution and subpicosecond temporal resolution necessary to probe subtle changes to binding and conformational dynamics. Ln3+ ions, particularly Tb3+ (70–77), are commonly used as luminescent substitutes for Ca2+, and bind to Ca2+ binding sites in proteins almost without exception (70). They serve as site-specific affinity probes, and as spectroscopic rulers to measure distances between binding sites (71). However, the fine distinctions between Ca2+- and Ln3+-occupied binding site structures, and possible differences in the global structure and activity of CaM bound by these metals, remain unresolved. While progress toward characterizing ion-dependent changes in binding site structure has been made using NMR spectroscopy (78, 79), work using these methods has been unable to characterize important structural details such as the mode of ion coordination by binding site carboxylate groups. Investigations of ion-dependent CaM activation show that even the minor structural changes induced by ion substitution can influence the behavior of CaM and its targets (80, 81). Our results indicate that the binding site structures of Ca2+- and Ln3+-bound CaM are distinct, suggesting that the mechanism of CaM activation by Ca2+ and Ln3+ ions may also differ.
Results
Experimental Strategy.
The overall objective of the research was to use FTIR and 2D IR spectroscopy to detect and characterize the perturbations to CaM binding site structure and dynamics, and to global CaM conformation, due to ion coordination. The Ln3+ ions (La3+, Tb3+, Lu3+) used in the study were selected for several reasons: (i) Ln3+ ions closely resemble the native Ca2+ ion in numerous physical and chemical properties, including chemical hardness, ionic radius, coordination number, and electrostatic coordination character (70); (ii) Ln3+ ions bind to and activate most of the Ca2+-binding proteins on which they have been tested (70); and (iii) the Ln3+ ions chosen span the width of the lanthanide series, sampling the maximum ionic radius range while holding ionic charge constant. As such, the (La3+, Tb3+, Lu3+) series allowed both controlled variation of ionic radius and comparison between native and nonphysiological ion binding. The perturbations effected by using different Ln3+ ions are subtler than the changes to ion binding sites that can be achieved using site-directed mutagenesis, which alters the chemical nature or the size and structure of amino acid side chains.
One of the challenges posed by interpreting spectra of CaM is the featureless and highly overlapped nature of protein infrared lineshapes, which arise from C=O vibrations inhabiting hundreds of slightly different environments (82). To aid the interpretation of CaM’s monodentate carboxylate features, we used EDTA as a simple model for spectroscopic interpretation. EDTA coordinates metal ions through four carboxylate groups, each of which assumes monodentate coordination geometry. Because of its small size and high symmetry (Fig. S1), EDTA has a simple infrared spectrum and is computationally tractable. We used electronic structure calculations of EDTA bound to the Ln3+ series and to a series of divalent metal cations (Sr2+, Ca2+, Mg2+) to interpret and assign spectral features in the carboxylate region of CaM spectra.
Infrared spectroscopy (both FTIR and 2D IR) of CaM’s carboxylate and carbonyl groups allows sensitive investigation of binding site structure and dynamics and overall protein conformation, since the C=O stretching vibration of both functional groups is highly sensitive to the local environment. Spectroscopic shifts of these vibrations can report on atomic displacements smaller than 0.1 Å and on processes occurring on timescales as short as 100 fs. The carboxylate and carbonyl absorptions are separate but proximal to one another along the infrared spectrum.
CaM contains 37 glutamate and aspartate residues, 14 of which participate in ion binding (Fig. S4). Since CaM’s ion binding sites contain a high proportion of glutamate and aspartate residues, absorptions in the carboxylate region (1,525 cm−1 to 1,600 cm−1) provide localized information about the binding sites and ion coordination (45, 83–85). Contribution of the nonbinding aspartate and glutamate residues to ion-dependent infrared features is minor because (i) the nonbinding carboxylate groups are highly solvent-exposed and (ii) the environment of these groups is not expected to change with ion binding. Therefore, infrared signatures of the nonbinding carboxylates will be both broad and invariant relative to binding site absorptions.
Since every residue contains a carbonyl group along the protein backbone, absorptions by the carbonyl groups occurring in the amide I region (1,600 cm−1 to 1,680 cm−1) provide information about CaM’s global structure (41, 63, 86–88). The combination of carboxylate and amide I infrared absorptions provides a critical link between the structure of the ion binding site and the global structural changes induced by ion binding in CaM.
FTIR Spectroscopy of EDTA.
FTIR spectra show ion-dependent shifts in the position of EDTA’s carboxylate asymmetric stretching absorption (Fig. 3). The absorption is centered at 1,584 cm−1 in the unbound molecule and blue-shifts (increases in frequency) with decreasing divalent cation radius to 1,586 cm−1, 1,588 cm−1, and 1,600 cm−1 as EDTA is bound to Sr2+, Ca2+, and Mg2+, respectively. Similarly, the absorption blue-shifts with decreasing lanthanide ion radius to 1,592 cm−1, 1,604 cm−1, and 1,608 cm−1 with binding to La3+, Tb3+, and Lu3+, respectively.
FTIR Spectroscopy of CaM.
FTIR spectra show distinctions between apo, Ca2+-bound, and Ln3+-bound CaM (Fig. 4). The broad 1,575 cm−1 side-chain absorption in the apo spectrum splits into a 1,580 cm−1 peak with a strong shoulder at 1,553 cm−1 upon Ca2+ binding. In the Ln3+ spectra, these features are broadened and blue-shifted. While intensity remains roughly constant at 1,570 cm−1 across the Ln3+ series, absorption strengthens with decreasing ionic radius (La3+ → Tb3+ → Lu3+) in the region between 1,570 cm−1 and 1,610 cm−1, suggesting that absorptions in the side-chain region become blue-shifted (increased in frequency).
Second derivative FTIR spectra highlight several significant features of the data. The broad absorption between 1,550 cm−1 and 1,600 cm−1 in the apo spectrum sharpens to two distinct peaks at 1,553 cm−1 and 1,580 cm−1 in the Ca2+ spectrum (Fig. 4, solid lines). These peaks disappear and are replaced by two broader features centered around 1,564 cm−1 and 1,585 cm−1 in the Ln3+ spectra. Both the apo and Ca2+ samples show a strong, broad amide I absorption centered at 1,644 cm−1 with a shoulder at 1,630 cm−1. These features are replaced by two strong, broad absorptions centered around 1,637 cm−1 and 1,648 cm−1 in the Ln3+ spectra. A sharp absorption at 1,618 cm−1, not present in the apo or Ca2+ spectra, is clearly visible in the La3+ and Tb3+ spectra. This feature appears strongly attenuated and symmetrically split in the Lu3+ spectrum. All samples show a sharp, weak absorption at 1,606 cm−1 and a pair of absorptions between 1,660 cm−1 and 1,680 cm−1. This pair, present at 1,662 cm−1 and 1,674 cm−1 in the Ca2+ spectrum, is slightly blue-shifted to 1,665 cm−1 and 1,675 cm−1 in the Ln3+ spectra.
Two-Dimensional IR Spectroscopy.
The 2D IR spectra of CaM (Fig. 5) provide a frequency-to-frequency correlation map of the protein’s molecular vibrations. A guide to 2D IR data analysis and interpretation is included in Two-Dimensional IR Data Collection and Analysis and Fig. S3. The apo and Ca2+ spectra show the amide I and side-chain absorptions to be centered around 1,640 cm−1 and 1,580 cm−1. As CaM is coordinated with Ln3+ ions of progressively smaller ionic radius, the side-chain absorption appears to blue-shift and gradually recede under the envelope of the amide I absorption.
Comparison of spectra taken at t2 values of 150 fs and 500 fs show that side-chain vibrational excitations decay faster than do amide I excitations. The ratio of maximum carboxylate amplitude to maximum amide I amplitude at different t2 values provides a measure of how quickly carboxylate vibrations in CaM’s binding sites decay relative to amide I vibrations in CaM’s backbone. By analyzing these ratios in combination with estimates of amide I vibrational relaxation extracted directly from pump-probe measurements (Calculation of CaM Binding Site Vibrational Relaxation and Fig. S5), we calculated decay constants for both the amide I and carboxylate vibrations (Table 1). Amide I vibrational excitation is longer lived than carboxylate excitation in all cases. Vibrational relaxation in the carboxylate region is slowest in Ca2+−CaM. A more detailed discussion of decay constant calculations is provided in Calculation of CaM Binding Site Vibrational Relaxation.
Table 1.
Sample | (SCOO−/SAmI) 150 fs | (SCOO−/SAmI) 500 fs | Ratio | τAmI, fs | τCOO−, fs |
apo | 0.17 | 0.069 | 0.41 | 590 | 230 |
Ca2+ | 0.15 | 0.095 | 0.63 | 670 | 360 |
La3+ | 0.19 | 0.079 | 0.42 | 670 | 250 |
Tb3+ | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.52 | 670 | 300 |
SCOO− is the peak spectroscopic amplitude of the carboxylate ground-state bleach, normalized to the strongest feature in the 2D IR spectrum. SAmI is the peak spectroscopic amplitude of the normalized amide I ground-state bleach. Ratio is the quotient of the amplitude ratios at 150 fs and 500 fs. Ratios were calculated using the maximum value for each peak at each t2 delay; τAmI is the time constant for decay of the amide I vibration; τCOO− is the time constant for decay of the carboxylate vibration. These metrics were not calculated for Lu3+-bound forms of the protein because the side-chain absorptions could not be separated from the amide I band in spectra of the Lu3+-bound samples. Additional parameters are available in Table S2.
Comparison of spectra taken at t2 values of 150 fs and 500 fs also shows ion-dependent changes in carboxylate region lineshapes. Both apo-CAM and Ca2+−CaM spectra contain a distinct carboxylate peak centered around 1,580 cm−1. This peak is elongated along the diagonal at 150 fs but shows time-dependent antidiagonal broadening, becoming rounder in the 500-fs spectrum. In spectra of Ln3+−CaM, separation of the carboxylate peak is less distinct and diagonal elongation of the carboxylate peak is more severe at both 150 fs and 500 fs. The Ln3+-carboxylate peaks show less time-dependent antidiagonal broadening than do their counterparts in the apo-CAM and Ca2+−CaM spectra.
Cross-peaks, which reflect vibrational energy transfer between oscillators that absorb at different frequencies, appear in the apo, Ca2+-, La3+-, and Tb3+-bound spectra and are visible in the (500 fs to 150 fs) difference spectra (Fig. 5, black arrows). While the same cross-peaks occur in each of these four spectra, they are most intense in the Ca2+−CaM spectra. Table 2 provides the frequencies and intensities of the cross-peaks. No cross-peaks were visible in the Lu3+-bound spectrum.
Table 2.
Sample | ωexc,1 | ωdet,1 | I1 | ωexc,2 | ωdet,2 | I2 |
apo | 1,593 | 1,633 | 0.30 | 1,613 | 1,642 | 0.31 |
Ca2+ | 1,597 | 1,637 | 0.44 | 1,614 | 1,641 | 0.64 |
La3+ | 1,596 | 1,633 | 0.22 | 1,613 | 1,644 | 0.20 |
Tb3+ | 1,597 | 1,633 | 0.26 | 1,613 | 1,643 | 0.28 |
Each spectrum contains two cross-peaks, the lower-frequency of which is subscripted “1” and the higher-frequency of which is subscripted “2”. Parameters included for each pair of cross-peaks: I, the normalized peak intensity of the cross-peak relative to the strongest feature in the spectrum; ωdet, the detection frequency at which the peaks appear (cm−1); ωexc, the excitation frequency at which the cross-peak appears (cm−1). No cross-peaks were visible in the Lu3+ spectrum.
Discussion
EDTA as a Model for Interpretation of Vibrational Modes in CaM’s Binding Sites.
We used EDTA as a simple spectroscopic model for interpreting CaM frequencies and lineshapes. The experimentally observed spectroscopic shifts of monodentate carboxylate asymmetric stretching modes in EDTA (Fig. 3) agree with predictions derived from density functional theory (DFT) calculations (Fig. 6). Both experiment and simulation indicate that these modes blue-shift (increase in frequency) as ionic radius is decreased and ionic charge is increased. Comparison of computed EDTA asymmetric stretch frequencies with those measured spectroscopically indicates that the simulations accurately reproduce charge- and radius-dependent trends in the frequencies of the carboxylate asymmetric stretching modes (Fig. 7). These results suggest that coordination to Ln3+ ions results in more compact ion binding configurations in which coordinating oxygens are closer to the metal ion than in the Ca2+-bound case.
Configuration-Dependent Behavior of Binding-Mediated Spectroscopic Shifts.
The manner in which a vibrational mode’s infrared absorption shifts due to ion binding is dependent on the binding configuration. The amide I modes of carbonyl groups, which can only bind in the monodentate configuration, are expected to red-shift (decrease in frequency) as ionic radius is decreased or ionic charge is increased (60). This can be considered a consequence of the positively charged ion withdrawing electron density from the C=O bond and thus decreasing the resonant frequency of the vibration. The asymmetric stretching modes of carboxylate groups bound in the bidentate configuration behave in the same manner (85, 89). Conversely, the asymmetric stretching modes of carboxylate groups bound in the monodentate configuration are expected to blue-shift (increase in frequency) as ionic radius is decreased or ionic charge is increased. This behavior is observed in both the experimental (Fig. 3) and computational (Fig. 6) investigations of EDTA included in the present work. We expect blue-shifting of the carboxylate asymmetric stretching mode to be accompanied by red-shifting of the carboxylate symmetric stretching mode, but do not analyze the latter in this work.
Vibrational Assignments and Binding Site Coordination Geometry.
Previous work has investigated ion binding in CaM and other proteins that coordinate metal cations using similar binding site architectures (25). These include studies of CaM itself (44, 86) and studies of CaM-like proteins in the EF-hand family such as troponin-C (47, 86) and parvalbumin (43, 46). Ion-coordinating carboxylates in proteins produce absorption features between 1,550 cm−1 and 1,590 cm−1 (25, 43, 44, 46, 90). More specifically, absorptions around 1,550 cm−1 correspond to glutamate side chains in bidentate coordination geometry, whereas absorptions between 1,560 cm−1 and 1,590 cm−1 correspond to monodentate or pseudobridging carboxylates (25, 43, 44, 46, 90).
Based on the previous literature, we assign the 1,553 cm−1 and 1,580 cm−1 absorptions in the Ca2+−CaM FTIR spectrum (Fig. 4, solid lines) to bidentate and monodentate carboxylates, respectively (Fig. 1). The 1,553 cm−1 feature is also clearly visible in the Ca2+−CaM 2D IR spectra (Fig. 5, red arrows). These assignments are supported by spectroscopic measurements (83, 91) and electronic structure calculations performed on model systems (45, 89), and by X-ray crystal structures of CaM (44, 92, 93).
As expected, the 1,553 cm−1 absorption feature associated with bidentate carboxylate ion coordination in Ca2+−CaM is absent in the apo-CaM FTIR spectrum, where it is replaced by a single broad absorption spanning most of the 1,550 cm−1 to 1,590-cm−1 carboxylate window. In spectra of Ln3+−CaM, this feature is expected to red-shift (decrease in frequency) due to increased ion charge (89). While the Ln3+−CaM FTIR spectra do indeed include absorption features around 1,535 cm−1, they are significantly broader and weaker than the 1,553 cm−1 feature present in the CaM−Ca2+ spectrum. This effect is especially pronounced in the Tb3+ and Lu3+ spectra. Furthermore, any trace of the bidentate peak is absent from the Ln3+ 2D IR spectra (Fig. 5). Therefore, we conclude that bidentate carboxylate binding configurations are either absent from Ln3+−CaM or significantly more disordered in Ln3+−CaM than in Ca2+−CaM. Our study of EDTA provides a tentative explanation for Ln3+-induced disruption of bidentate ion coordination by the glutamate carboxylate group. Contraction of the binding site caused by Ln3+ coordination may place steric or electrostatic constraints on the carboxylate group that make bidentate coordination less favorable, forcing the side chain to reorient. Collapse of the binding site may also lead to greater structural disorder relative to the native configuration. This would explain why absorption features in Ln3+−CaM spectra are weaker and broader than their counterparts in Ca2+−CaM spectra.
The 1,580 cm−1 monodentate peak in Ca2+−CaM is replaced by a single broad absorption spanning the 1,560 cm−1 to 1,590-cm−1 monodentate carboxylate window in the apo-CaM FTIR spectrum. In spectra of Ln3+−CaM, this peak is expected to blue-shift (increase in frequency) due to greater ion charge. This effect, opposite the shift expected for bidentate carboxylates, is predicted by DFT calculations that employ EDTA as a spectroscopic model (Fig. 6 and Table S1). The Ln3+−CaM spectra show two new features in the monodentate carboxylate region: one around 1,565 cm−1 and another around 1,585 cm−1. The 1,585 cm−1 peak may be attributed to blue-shifting of the 1,580 cm−1 feature present in the Ca2+−CaM spectrum (Fig. 4) in agreement with DFT predictions. We note that, unlike monodentate carboxylate absorptions in EDTA, the 1,585 cm−1 Ln3+−CaM features do not exhibit significant ion-dependent spectral shifts. We tentatively assign this invariance to the larger size and greater structural heterogeneity of CaM’s binding sites, which may make individual oxygen ion radii less sensitive to small changes in the ionic radius of the bound ion. The 1,565 cm−1 feature is more difficult to assign. It is both higher in frequency than the Ca2+−CaM bidentate peak at 1,553 cm−1 (which should be red-shifted to lower frequency by Ln3+ binding) and lower in frequency than the Ca2+−CaM monodentate peak (which should be blue-shifted to higher frequency by Ln3+ binding). Thus, we tentatively assign this feature to either monodentate or pseudobridging carboxylate configurations that are unique to Ln3+−CaM.
The 1,565 cm−1 and 1,585 cm−1 Ln3+−CaM peaks are weaker and broader than the 1,580 cm−1 feature in the Ca2+−CaM spectrum. They are strongest in the La3+−CaM spectrum and become progressively broader and weaker, while retaining their positions, in the Tb3+−CaM and Lu3+−CaM spectra. Keeping this and the above discussion in mind, we conclude that transitions between the three Ln3+−CaM species do not induce significant binding site reconfiguration, but subtly affect structural disorder in the binding site since the absorption features in the Ln3+−CaM spectra change in broadness and intensity but do not significantly shift.
Overall, the FTIR data support three conclusions: (i) Binding to Ln3+ ions eliminates or significantly destabilizes the bidentate ion coordination characteristic of the Ca2+-bound position 12 glutamate residue, (ii) binding to Ln3+ ions introduces monodentate and/or pseudobridging configurations among the binding sites’ carboxylate side chains that are more disordered than their Ca2+-bound counterparts, and (iii) ionic charge exerts a stronger influence on binding site configuration than does ionic radius.
Subpicosecond Relaxation and Energy Exchange in CaM’s Binding Sites.
Measurements of vibrational relaxation in all CaM samples show that the side-chain vibrational modes relax 20 to 40% more rapidly than do the backbone amide I modes. The rate of carboxylate relaxation is weakly dependent on the bound ion and is slowest in Ca2+−CaM. The faster relaxation rates observed in apo-CaM and Ln3+−CaM may be attributed, in part, to greater binding site disorder and structural flexibility than is present in Ca2+−CaM. Since the Ca2+−CaM binding sites sample fewer configurations than do their Ln3+-bound and apo counterparts, they less frequently inhabit structural states that efficiently couple and exchange energy into their surroundings.
Since CaM’s binding sites are ordered and each contain several carboxylate groups in close proximity, we considered the possibility that ion-dependent vibrational coupling could perturb the carboxylate asymmetric stretching modes used to probe the binding site environment. We used a simple transition dipole coupling model in combination with published structures of Ca2+−CaM and estimates of Ln3+-induced binding site contraction derived from our EDTA studies to calculate the likely extent of ion-dependent coupling in the binding site (Estimation of Carboxylate Vibrational Coupling in CaM’s Binding Sites). The calculations show that coupling is unlikely to significantly affect the vibrational modes we employ as probes.
The 2D IR spectra show time- and ion-dependent changes in carboxylate region lineshapes. These lineshapes provide a measure of static and dynamic structural disorder. Antidiagonal broadening gives rise to rounder peaks and reflects loss of correlation between excitation and detection frequencies. On subpicosecond timescales, this loss of correlation indicates rapid conformational interconversion characteristic of fast, local structural fluctuations or energy transfer within a single structure. The subpicosecond antidiagonal broadening present in the apo-CAM and Ca2+−CaM carboxylate spectra (Fig. 5, Insets) suggests the presence of one dominant binding site configuration.
In comparison with the apo-CAM and Ca2+−CaM results, 2D IR spectra of Ln3+−CaM show more severe diagonal broadening and less pronounced time-dependent antidiagonal broadening. The persistence of diagonal elongation reflects retention of correlation between excitation and detection frequencies. On subpicosecond timescales, this retention indicates the presence of multiple, distinct structures that do not undergo conformational interconversion or energy transfer within 500 fs. Thus, the persistence of diagonal elongation in the Ln3+−CaM carboxylate spectra (Fig. 5, Insets) indicates that Ln3+ binding causes CaM’s binding sites to splinter into multiple distinct configurations that do not readily interconvert. In view of vibrational relaxation results (Table 1), the manifold of configurations occupied by Ln3+−CaM binding sites is more efficient at coupling and exchanging energy with the surroundings than the well-defined configurations assumed by Ca2+−CaM binding sites.
The 2D IR difference spectra show the growth of two cross-peaks (Fig. 5, difference spectra, black arrows) from 150 fs to 500 fs as a result of energy transfer within the binding site. We used electronic structure calculations and frequency analysis of the binding sites (Vibrational Assignments of Ca2+−CaM Binding Site Residues) to assign the cross-peaks. In the first cross-peak, we assign excitation frequencies around 1,595 cm−1 to monodentate carboxylates, and detection frequencies around 1,633 cm−1 to backbone C=O groups present in the binding sites. In the second cross-peak, we assign excitation frequencies around 1,615 cm−1 to asparagine side chains within the binding site and detection frequencies around 1,642 cm−1 to backbone C=O groups in the binding sites (Table S4).
The cross-peaks are most intense in the Ca2+−CaM spectrum. They also appear in the apo-CaM, La3+−CaM, and Tb3+−CaM spectra at approximately the same locations as the Ca2+−CaM cross-peaks. Since cross-peaks reflect the degree of vibrational coupling and energy transfer between specific subsets of residues, they will be strongest when the interacting residues are in close proximity and have well-defined relative positions. The exceptional strength of the cross-peaks in Ca2+−CaM indicates that the binding sites are more compact and rigid in Ca2+−CaM than they are in apo-CaM or Ln3+−CaM. This finding agrees with the conclusions supported by the FTIR spectra.
Overall, the 2D IR data suggest that Ln3+-bound CaM experiences measurably greater structural disorder than does Ca2+−CaM. Distinctions in dynamic behavior are more nuanced. (i) Binding sites in apo-CaM and Ln3+−CaM exhibit less structural stability and more local disorder than do binding sites in Ca2+−CaM as reflected by faster rates of vibrational relaxation of features in the carboxylate region. (ii) Binding sites in apo-CaM and Ca2+−CaM occupy well-defined configurations whereas binding sites in Ln3+−CaM occupy a manifold of configurations as reflected by 2D IR lineshapes. (iii) Binding sites in apo-CaM and Ln3+−CaM are characterized by weaker intramolecular contacts and a smaller degree of structural rigidity than are Ca2+−CaM’s binding sites as reflected by cross-peaks in the 2D IR spectra. So stark is this distinction that both La3+−CaM and Tb3+−CaM more closely resemble apo-CaM than Ca2+−CaM from the perspective of the cross-peaks.
Conclusion
Ion binding of CaM to Ca2+ and to a series of Ln3+ ions was studied with IR spectroscopy and DFT calculations and modeled using experiments and simulations of ion binding in EDTA. The ion binding sites of CaM were found to be distorted, relative to binding with the protein’s native Ca2+ ion, by coordination with the lanthanides.
Experimental findings include the following: (i) Disappearance of the FTIR peak at 1,553 cm−1 strongly suggests that bidentate ion binding present in Ca2+-bound CaM is absent or unmeasurably fleeting in Ln3+-bound forms. (ii) Appearance of new, broader, and higher-frequency side-chain FTIR peaks in Ln3+−CaM suggests new binding site configurations characterized by greater structural disorder and purely monodentate and/or pseudobridging metal coordination. (iii) Similarity of the Ln3+−CaM spectra indicates that ionic charge, not ionic radius, is the most important determinant of binding site configuration and structural stability. (iv) Interpretation of CaM FTIR spectra using EDTA suggests that coordination to Ln3+ ions causes binding site contraction. (v) Binding site vibrational relaxation in Ca2+−CaM and Ln3+−CaM indicates that Ln3+-bound binding sites exhibit shorter vibrational lifetimes due to greater structural flexibility and disorder. (vi) The 2D IR lineshapes indicate that binding of Ln3+ causes CaM’s binding sites to assume multiple configurations, whereas binding sites in Ca2+-CaM assume a single dominant conformation. (vii) The 2D IR cross-peak strengths indicate that the binding sites are more compact and rigid in Ca2+−CaM than in Ln3+−CaM.
Taken together, the experimental findings form a coherent picture of the structural and dynamic changes that attend CaM’s coordination to the lanthanides. CaM’s structure and kinetic behavior—notably including finely tuned rates of ion capture and release—are strongly conserved and specific to Ca2+. Upon lanthanide binding, this carefully tuned structure is distorted. Oxygen ion radii contract, and the compressed, more tightly bound geometries of the Ln3+-associated coordination sites either totally exclude bidentate coordination by the position 12 glutamate or cause it to become unstable. Similarly, the relatively stable and well-defined binding site structures anchored by Ca2+ coordination are disrupted in the presence of Ln3+ ions and splinter into multiple distinct configurations.
Since CaM structure and ion capture/release behavior is specific to Ca2+, the notion that CaM may be more disordered when binding Ln3+ than when binding Ca2+ is not necessarily at odds with studies that have shown CaM to have higher affinity for Tb3+ than for Ca2+ (75). The greater degree of order in Ca2+−CaM likely reflects structural optimization, tuned for functionally advantageous Ca2+ capture and release rates and conformational response to Ca2+, rather than energetic favorability. Similarly, the disruption of bidentate ion binding in Ln3+−CaM does not necessarily entail weaker binding in the coordination site. To the contrary, the greater number of geometric constraints imposed by bidentate coordination may mean that the opposite is true.
Thus, while Tb3+ may appear to fully activate CaM in experiments that do not test the protein’s full range of function, it is likely that the structural and dynamic disruptions attending Ln3+ binding inhibit or destroy aspects of CaM’s behavior that are important to conformational transduction of complex Ca2+ signals. This result may hold true for biophysical studies of other proteins that make use of nonnative ions, and demonstrates that the use of apparently innocuous substitutions may significantly perturb ion affinity, binding behavior, and activation.
Materials and Methods
FTIR and 2D IR spectroscopy were used to measure variations in vibrational frequencies and couplings in CaM bound to Ca2+ and to a series (La3+, Tb3+, Lu3+) of Ln3+ ions. Vibrational assignments were guided by ion-specific FTIR spectroscopy and DFT of the model ion-chelating compound EDTA.
CaM Preparation.
Recombinant, tagless CaM in the pET21a vector (Millipore Sigma) was expressed in BL21(DE3) cells (New England Biolabs). CaM was purified using established methods (94), but adding a final fractionation step off a preparative grade C18 column with an acetonitrile gradient for protein elution. Concentrated CaM solutions (2 mL) were dialyzed against a series of 1-L solutions for 8 h to 12 h each. The CaM was first dialyzed against two exchanges of 5 mM EDTA (>99%; Sigma-Aldrich) and 50 mM MOPS [3-(N-morpholino) propanesulfonic acid] (99%; Acros Organics) in 18-MΩ water at pH 7.4 to remove any calcium from the original solution. Next, it was dialyzed against two exchanges of 50 mM MOPS in ultrapure water at pH 7.4 to remove EDTA, whose absorption spectrum overlaps with the amide I and side-chain bands of interest to this study. Finally, it was dialyzed against two exchanges of ultrapure water.
The dialyzed CaM solution was flash frozen in LN2 and lyophilized. The lyophilized product was deuterated by incubation in pure D2O (99.9% isotopic purity; Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) at 50 °C for 2 h before being flash frozen and lyophilized again. The lyophilized, deuterated CaM was finally dissolved in a 50-mM solution of deuterated MOPS in D2O adjusted to an uncorrected pH* of 6.3 with DCl (99 atom% D; Sigma-Aldrich) and NaOD (99 atom% D; Sigma-Aldrich). This pH was chosen because it was found to allow both CaM and lanthanide salts to dissolve. Lower pH values cause CaM to aggregate and precipitate, while higher values precipitate lanthanide hydroxides.
The CaM/MOPS solution was combined in equal proportion with solutions of anhydrous CaCl2 (>97%; Sigma-Aldrich), LaCl3 (99.9%; Alfa Aesar), TbCl3 (99.9%; Alfa Aesar), and LuCl3 (99.9%; Alfa Aesar) in 50 mM MOPS/D2O to yield final samples of 1.1 mM in CaM, 5 mM in calcium or lanthanide ion to ensure saturation in all binding sites, and 50 mM in MOPS, in D2O at an uncorrected pH reading of 6.3.
EDTA Preparation.
EDTA was used as received and prepared at 10 mg/mL concentration in D2O at an uncorrected pH* reading of 11 to deprotonate the molecule’s carboxylate groups. Solutions equimolar in EDTA and the chloride salt of the given ion were used for FTIR measurements.
FTIR Spectroscopy.
FTIR measurements were taken using a Bruker Vertex 70 spectrometer with a deuterated triglycine sulfate detector at 2 cm−1 resolution. The sample was held between two CaF2 windows separated by a 50-μm Teflon spacer. The sample area was purged with dry (−100 °F dew point) air.
Two-Dimensional IR Spectroscopy.
The 2D IR measurements were taken using a custom-built 2D IR spectrometer as described in detail in Two-Dimensional IR Spectrometer and Fig. S2. In short, ∼100-fs midinfrared laser pulses probe the time-dependent IR absorption spectrum of the sample following excitation by a pair of pump pulses. Analogous to 2D NMR, 2D IR thus spreads the IR frequency information across two axes and allows for measurement of energy transfer and vibrational relaxation.
Computational Methods.
Detailed descriptions of carboxylate coupling estimation (Estimation of Carboxylate Vibrational Coupling in CaM’s Binding Sites), computational methods (Computational Methods), and assignment of EDTA spectral features are provided in Frequency Assignment of EDTA Spectral Features. Briefly, geometry optimization and vibrational assignment of EDTA bound to a series of ions were performed using DFT. Similarly, the vibrational frequencies of carboxylates and carbonyls in CaM’s four binding sites were examined using geometries extracted from the crystal structure (PDB ID: 1CLM).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank John F. Stanton (University of Florida) for productive discussions. We acknowledge financial support from the College of Natural Sciences at the University of Texas at Austin for seed funding through a Catalyst Grant, from the Welch Foundation under Award F-1891, and from the National Institutes of Health under Award R01NS077821. Computer simulations were run at the Texas Advanced Computing Center.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1722042115/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Klee CB, Vanaman TC. Calmodulin. Adv Protein Chem. 1982;35:213–321. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60470-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Weinstein H, Mehler EL. Ca2+-binding and structural dynamics in the functions of calmodulin. Annu Rev Physiol. 1994;56:213–236. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.56.030194.001241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chin D, Means AR. Calmodulin: A prototypical calcium sensor. Trends Cell Biol. 2000;10:322–328. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01800-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cheung WY. Calmodulin plays a pivotal role in cellular regulation. Science. 1980;207:19–27. doi: 10.1126/science.6243188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hoeflich KP, Ikura M. Calmodulin in action: Diversity in target recognition and activation mechanisms. Cell. 2002;108:739–742. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00682-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Halling DB, Liebeskind BJ, Hall AW, Aldrich RW. Conserved properties of individual Ca2+-binding sites in calmodulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:E1216–E1225. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600385113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Baba ML, Goodman M, Berger-Cohn J, Demaille JG, Matsuda G. The early adaptive evolution of calmodulin. Mol Biol Evol. 1984;1:442–455. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Saimi Y, Kung C. Calmodulin as an ion channel subunit. Annu Rev Physiol. 2002;64:289–311. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.100301.111649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sorensen AB, Søndergaard MT, Overgaard MT. Calmodulin in a heartbeat. FEBS J. 2013;280:5511–5532. doi: 10.1111/febs.12337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Carafoli E, Santella L, Branca D, Brini M. Generation, control, and processing of cellular calcium signals. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2001;36:107–260. doi: 10.1080/20014091074183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rizzuto R, Pozzan T. Microdomains of intracellular Ca2+: Molecular determinants and functional consequences. Physiol Rev. 2006;86:369–408. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00004.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Burgoyne RD. Neuronal calcium sensor proteins: Generating diversity in neuronal Ca2+ signalling. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:182–193. doi: 10.1038/nrn2093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Clapham DE. Calcium signaling. Cell. 2007;131:1047–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Berridge MJ. Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signalling mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1793:933–940. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Klee CB, Crouch TH, Richman PG. Calmodulin. Annu Rev Biochem. 1980;49:489–515. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.49.070180.002421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Crivici A, Ikura M. Molecular and structural basis of target recognition by calmodulin. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1995;24:85–116. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.24.060195.000505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yap KL, et al. Calmodulin target database. J Struct Funct Genomics. 2000;1:8–14. doi: 10.1023/a:1011320027914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vorherr T, et al. Interaction of calmodulin with the calmodulin binding domain of the plasma membrane Ca2+ pump. Biochemistry. 1990;29:355–365. doi: 10.1021/bi00454a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Finn BE, et al. Calcium-induced structural changes and domain autonomy in calmodulin. Nat Struct Biol. 1995;2:777–783. doi: 10.1038/nsb0995-777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang M, Tanaka T, Ikura M. Calcium-induced conformational transition revealed by the solution structure of apo calmodulin. Nat Struct Biol. 1995;2:758–767. doi: 10.1038/nsb0995-758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Babu YS, et al. Three-dimensional structure of calmodulin. Nature. 1985;315:37–40. doi: 10.1038/315037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Meador WE, Means AR, Quiocho FA. Target enzyme recognition by calmodulin: 2.4 A structure of a calmodulin-peptide complex. Science. 1992;257:1251–1255. doi: 10.1126/science.1519061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bootman MD, Lipp P, Berridge MJ. The organisation and functions of local Ca2+ signals. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:2213–2222. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.12.2213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ikura M. Calcium binding and conformational response in EF-hand proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 1996;21:14–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nara M, Tanokura M. Infrared spectroscopic study of the metal-coordination structures of calcium-binding proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;369:225–239. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.11.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Falke JJ, Drake SK, Hazard AL, Peersen OB. Molecular tuning of ion binding to calcium signaling proteins. Q Rev Biophys. 1994;27:219–290. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500003012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schumacher MA, Rivard AF, Bächinger HP, Adelman JP. Structure of the gating domain of a Ca2+-activated K+ channel complexed with Ca2+/calmodulin. Nature. 2001;410:1120–1124. doi: 10.1038/35074145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schumacher MA, Crum M, Miller MC. Crystal structures of apocalmodulin and an apocalmodulin/SK potassium channel gating domain complex. Structure. 2004;12:849–860. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2004.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Changeux J-P, Edelstein SJ. Allosteric mechanisms of signal transduction. Science. 2005;308:1424–1428. doi: 10.1126/science.1108595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hines KE, Middendorf TR, Aldrich RW. Determination of parameter identifiability in nonlinear biophysical models: A Bayesian approach. J Gen Physiol. 2014;143:401–416. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201311116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Middendorf TR, Aldrich RW. Structural identifiability of equilibrium ligand-binding parameters. J Gen Physiol. 2017;149:105–119. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201611702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Middendorf TR, Aldrich RW. The structure of binding curves and practical identifiability of equilibrium ligand-binding parameters. J Gen Physiol. 2017;149:121–147. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201611703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li W, Halling DB, Hall AW, Aldrich RW. EF hands at the N-lobe of calmodulin are required for both SK channel gating and stable SK-calmodulin interaction. J Gen Physiol. 2009;134:281–293. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200910295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ben-Johny M, Yue DT. Calmodulin regulation (calmodulation) of voltage-gated calcium channels. J Gen Physiol. 2014;143:679–692. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201311153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Halling DB, Kenrick SA, Riggs AF, Aldrich RW. Calcium-dependent stoichiometries of the KCa2.2 (SK) intracellular domain/calmodulin complex in solution. J Gen Physiol. 2014;143:231–252. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201311007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Abaskharon RM, et al. Isotope-labeled aspartate sidechain as a non-perturbing infrared probe: Application to investigate the dynamics of a carboxylate buried inside a protein. Chem Phys Lett. 2017;683:193–198. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2017.03.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Slayton RM, Anfinrud PA. Time-resolved mid-infrared spectroscopy: Methods and biological applications. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997;7:717–721. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80083-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Callender R, Dyer RB. Advances in time-resolved approaches to characterize the dynamical nature of enzymatic catalysis. Chem Rev. 2006;106:3031–3042. doi: 10.1021/cr050284b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Markwick PR, Malliavin T, Nilges M. Structural biology by NMR: Structure, dynamics, and interactions. PLOS Comput Biol. 2008;4:e1000168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shi Y. A glimpse of structural biology through X-ray crystallography. Cell. 2014;159:995–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Barth A. Infrared spectroscopy of proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1767:1073–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ataka K, Kottke T, Heberle J. Thinner, smaller, faster: IR techniques to probe the functionality of biological and biomimetic systems. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49:5416–5424. doi: 10.1002/anie.200907114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nara M, et al. Infrared studies of interaction between metal ions and Ca2+-binding proteins. Marker bands for identifying the types of coordination of the side-chain COO- groups to metal ions in pike parvalbumin (pI = 4.10) FEBS Lett. 1994;349:84–88. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00645-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nara M, Tanokura M, Yamamoto T, Tasumi M. A comparative study of the binding effects of Mg2+, Ca2+, Sr2+, and Cd2+ on calmodulin by fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Biospectroscopy. 1995;1:47–54. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nara M, Torii H, Tasumi M. Correlation between the vibrational frequencies of the carboxylate group and the types of its coordination to a metal ion: An ab initio molecular orbital study. J Phys Chem. 1996;100:19812–19817. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mizuguchi M, Nara M, Kawano K, Nitta K. FT-IR study of the Ca2+-binding to bovine alpha-lactalbumin. Relationships between the type of coordination and characteristics of the bands due to the Asp COO- groups in the Ca2+-binding site. FEBS Lett. 1997;417:153–156. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)01274-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yumoto F, et al. Coordination structures of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in Akazara scallop troponin C in solution. FTIR spectroscopy of side-chain COO- groups. Eur J Biochem. 2001;268:6284–6290. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02583.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kratochvil HT, et al. Instantaneous ion configurations in the K+ ion channel selectivity filter revealed by 2D IR spectroscopy. Science. 2016;353:1040–1044. doi: 10.1126/science.aag1447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang L, et al. 2DIR spectroscopy of human amylin fibrils reflects stable β-sheet structure. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:16062–16071. doi: 10.1021/ja204035k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Stevenson P, Tokmakoff A. Distinguishing gramicidin D conformers through two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy of vibrational excitons. J Chem Phys. 2015;142:212424. doi: 10.1063/1.4917321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Middleton CT, et al. Two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy reveals the complex behaviour of an amyloid fibril inhibitor. Nat Chem. 2012;4:355–360. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Thielges MC, et al. Two-dimensional IR spectroscopy of protein dynamics using two vibrational labels: A site-specific genetically encoded unnatural amino acid and an active site ligand. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115:11294–11304. doi: 10.1021/jp206986v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Remorino A, Hochstrasser RM. Three-dimensional structures by two-dimensional vibrational spectroscopy. Acc Chem Res. 2012;45:1896–1905. doi: 10.1021/ar3000025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chalyavi F, Hogle DG, Tucker MJ. Tyrosine as a non-perturbing site-specific vibrational reporter for protein dynamics. J Phys Chem B. 2017;121:6380–6389. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b04999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ganim Z, et al. Amide I two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy of proteins. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:432–441. doi: 10.1021/ar700188n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kim YS, Hochstrasser RM. Applications of 2D IR spectroscopy to peptides, proteins, and hydrogen-bond dynamics. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113:8231–8251. doi: 10.1021/jp8113978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Cho M. Coherent two-dimensional optical spectroscopy. Chem Rev. 2008;108:1331–1418. doi: 10.1021/cr078377b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Le Sueur AL, Horness RE, Thielges MC. Applications of two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy. Analyst (Lond) 2015;140:4336–4349. doi: 10.1039/c5an00558b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Serrano AL, Waegele MM, Gai F. Spectroscopic studies of protein folding: Linear and nonlinear methods. Protein Sci. 2012;21:157–170. doi: 10.1002/pro.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Baiz CR, Reppert M, Tokmakoff A. An introduction to protein 2D IR spectroscopy. In: Fayer MD, editor. Ultrafast Infrared Vibrational Spectroscopy. Taylor Francis; New York: 2013. pp. 361–404. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Baiz CR, Peng CS, Reppert ME, Jones KC, Tokmakoff A. Coherent two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy: Quantitative analysis of protein secondary structure in solution. Analyst (Lond) 2012;137:1793–1799. doi: 10.1039/c2an16031e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Minnes L, et al. Quantifying secondary structure changes in calmodulin using 2D-IR spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 2017;89:10898–10906. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hamm P, Lim M, Hochstrasser RM. Structure of the Amide-I band of peptides measured by FS nonlinear infrared spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B. 1998;102:6123–6138. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Peng CS, Jones KC, Tokmakoff A. Anharmonic vibrational modes of nucleic acid bases revealed by 2D IR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:15650–15660. doi: 10.1021/ja205636h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Peng CS, Baiz CR, Tokmakoff A. Direct observation of ground-state lactam-lactim tautomerization using temperature-jump transient 2D IR spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:9243–9248. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303235110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Shim S-H, Strasfeld DB, Ling YL, Zanni MT. Automated 2D IR spectroscopy using a mid-IR pulse shaper and application of this technology to the human islet amyloid polypeptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:14197–14202. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700804104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Shim S-H, Zanni MT. How to turn your pump-probe instrument into a multidimensional spectrometer: 2D IR and Vis spectroscopies via pulse shaping. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009;11:748–761. doi: 10.1039/b813817f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cho M. In: Two-Dimensional Optical Spectroscopy. Cho M, editor. Taylor Francis; New York: 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hamm P, Zanni M. In: Concepts and Methods of 2D Infrared Spectroscopy. Hamm P, Zanni M, editors. Cambridge Univ Press; New York: 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Brittain HG, Richardson FS, Martin RB. Terbium (III) emission as a probe of calcium(II) binding sites in proteins. J Am Chem Soc. 1976;98:8255–8260. doi: 10.1021/ja00441a060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kilhoffer MC, Demaille JG, Gerard D. Terbium as luminescent probe of calmodulin calcium-binding sites; domains I and II contain the high-affinity sites. FEBS Lett. 1980;116:269–272. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80660-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kilhoffer M-C, Gerard D, Demaille JG. Terbium binding to octopus calmodulin provides the complete sequence of ion binding. FEBS Lett. 1980;120:99–103. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)81055-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Horrocks WD, Jr, Sudnick DR. Lanthanide ion luminescence probes of the structure of biological macromolecules. Acc Chem Res. 1981;14:384–392. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wallace RW, Tallant EA, Dockter ME, Cheung WY. Calcium binding domains of calmodulin. Sequence of fill as determined with terbium luminescence. J Biol Chem. 1982;257:1845–1854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wang CL, Leavis PC, Gergely J. Kinetic studies show that Ca2+ and Tb3+ have different binding preferences toward the four Ca2+-binding sites of calmodulin. Biochemistry. 1984;23:6410–6415. doi: 10.1021/bi00321a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mulqueen P, Tingey JM, Horrocks WD., Jr Characterization of lanthanide (III) ion binding to calmodulin using luminescence spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 1985;24:6639–6645. doi: 10.1021/bi00344a051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Hogue CW, MacManus JP, Banville D, Szabo AG. Comparison of terbium (III) luminescence enhancement in mutants of EF hand calcium binding proteins. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:13340–13347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bentrop D, et al. Solution structure of the paramagnetic complex of the N-terminal domain of calmodulin with two Ce3+ ions by 1H NMR. Biochemistry. 1997;36:11605–11618. doi: 10.1021/bi971022+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Bertini I, et al. Accurate solution structures of proteins from X-ray data and a minimal set of NMR data: Calmodulin-peptide complexes as examples. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:5134–5144. doi: 10.1021/ja8080764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Chao SH, Suzuki Y, Zysk JR, Cheung WY. Activation of calmodulin by various metal cations as a function of ionic radius. Mol Pharmacol. 1984;26:75–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Rainteau D, Wolf C, Lavialle F. Effects of calcium and calcium analogs on calmodulin: A Fourier transform infrared and electron spin resonance investigation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989;1011:81–87. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(89)90082-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Baiz CR, Tokmakoff A. Structural disorder of folded proteins: Isotope-edited 2D IR spectroscopy and Markov state modeling. Biophys J. 2015;108:1747–1757. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.12.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Deacon G, Phillips R. Relationships between the carbon-oxygen stretching frequencies of carboxylato complexes and the type of carboxylate coordination. Coord Chem Rev. 1980;33:227–250. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Deacon G, Huber F, Phillips R. Diagnosis of the nature of carboxylate coordination from the direction of shifts of carbon-oxygen stretching frequencies. Inorg Chim Acta. 1985;104:41–45. [Google Scholar]
- 85.DePalma JW, Kelleher PJ, Tavares LC, Johnson MA. Coordination-dependent spectroscopic signatures of divalent metal ion binding to carboxylate head groups: H2- and He-tagged vibrational spectra of M2+·RCO2– (M = Mg and Ca, R = -CD3, -CD2CD3) complexes. J Phys Chem Lett. 2017;8:484–488. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Trewhella J, Liddle WK, Heidorn DB, Strynadka N. Calmodulin and troponin C structures studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: Effects of Ca2+ and Mg2+ binding. Biochemistry. 1989;28:1294–1301. doi: 10.1021/bi00429a052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Baiz CR, Reppert M, Tokmakoff A. Amide I two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy: Methods for visualizing the vibrational structure of large proteins. J Phys Chem A. 2013;117:5955–5961. doi: 10.1021/jp310689a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Reppert M, Tokmakoff A. Electrostatic frequency shifts in amide I vibrational spectra: Direct parameterization against experiment. J Chem Phys. 2013;138:134116. doi: 10.1063/1.4798938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Sutton CC, da Silva G, Franks GV. Modeling the IR spectra of aqueous metal carboxylate complexes: Correlation between bonding geometry and stretching mode wavenumber shifts. Chemistry. 2015;21:6801–6805. doi: 10.1002/chem.201406516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Nara M, Morii H, Tanokura M. Coordination to divalent cations by calcium-binding proteins studied by FTIR spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1828:2319–2327. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Tackett JE. FT-IR characterization of metal acetates in aqueous solution. Appl Spectrosc. 1989;43:483–489. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Rao ST, et al. Structure of Paramecium tetraurelia calmodulin at 1.8 A resolution. Protein Sci. 1993;2:436–447. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560020316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Chattopadhyaya R, Meador WE, Means AR, Quiocho FA. Calmodulin structure refined at 1.7 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1992;228:1177–1192. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90324-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Marshak DR, et al. Strategies for Protein Purification and Characterization: A Laboratory Course Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Lab; Plainview, NY: 1996. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.