Abstract
Telomeres are crucial in the maintenance of chromosome integrity and genomic stability. Critically short telomeres can trigger programmed cell death while cells with longer telomeres may have increased likelihood of replicative errors, resulting in genetic mutations and chromosomal alterations, and ultimately promoting oncogenesis. Data on telomere length and lung cancer risk from large prospective cohort studies are spare. Relative telomere length in peripheral blood leukocytes was quantified using a validated monochrome multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method in 26,540 participants of the Singapore Chinese Health Study. After a follow-up of 12 years, 654 participants developed lung cancer including 288 adenocarcinoma, 113 squamous cell carcinoma, and 253 other/unknown histological type. The Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). HR of lung adenocarcinoma for individuals in the highest comparing the lowest 20 percentile of telomere length was 2.84 (95% CI 1.94–4.14, Ptrend<0.0001). This positive association was present in never smokers (Ptrend<0.0001), ever smokers (Ptrend=0.0010), men (Ptrend=0.0003), women (Ptrend<0.0001), and in shorter (Ptrend=0.0002) and longer (Ptrend=0.0001) duration of follow-up. There was no association between telomere length and risk of squamous cell carcinoma or other histological type of lung cancer in all or subgroups of individuals. The agreement of results from this prospective cohort study with those of previous prospective studies and Mendelian randomization studies suggest a possible etiological role of telomere length in the development of lung adenocarcinoma.
INTRODUCTION
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women in the U.S. and worldwide.1, 2 It is estimated that more than 155,000 Americans will die from lung cancer in 2017.3 Although the overall 5-year survival rate of lung cancer patients is only 18%, patients with localized lung cancer at diagnosis have a 5-year survival rate of 55%.3 Since 1970s, the number of lung adenocarcinomas has increased from approximately 20% to around 50%, and has surpassed squamous cell carcinoma, becoming the most common histological subtype of lung cancer in early 2010s.4 With the increasing occurrence of lung cancer adenocarcinoma cases, identifying novel markers for lung adenocarcinoma is important for understanding the increasing incidence of this malignancy.
Telomeres consist of long tracts of nucleotide repeats (TTAGGG) and are associated with a protein complex termed shelterin at the ends of chromosomes that is essential for maintaining chromosomal integrity.5, 6 Telomeres shorten with each cell division due to the end replication problem.7 In stem and progenitor cells, the telomerase enzyme elongates telomeres, enabling prolonged cell survival and proliferation.8 Telomerase is also activated in more than 90% of human cancers,9 resulting in sustained proliferation and survival of cells that otherwise would have undergone irreversible growth arrest or programmed cell death.10 In this way, telomere shortening in telomerase deficient normal cells serves as a mechanism of tumor suppression.
Recently, Mendelian randomization studies using germline genetic variants as instrumental variables derived from genome-wide association studies showed that a genetic score for longer telomere length was significantly associated with increased risk of lung cancer.11–13 These findings are intriguing since they imply causal relevance. Given the potential limitations due to pleiotropy effect, population stratification, or ancestry from the Mendelian randomization studies, we examined the association between directly quantified telomere length and the risk of lung cancer incidence in the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Our findings of a statistically significant, robust association between longer telomeres and increased risk of lung adenocarcinoma, along with previous prospective and Mendelian randomization studies, strongly support to a possible etiological role of telomere length in the development of lung adenocarcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Population
Study subjects were drawn from the Singapore Chinese Health Study.14 Briefly, from April 1993 through December 1998, the Singapore Chinese Health Study enrolled 63,257 Chinese men and women aged 45–74 years who belonged to the Hokkien or Cantonese dialect group, and resided in government-built housing estates. At recruitment, each subject was interviewed in person by a trained interviewer to obtain information on demographics, body weight and height, lifetime use of tobacco (cigarettes and water-pipe), current physical activity, menstrual/reproductive history (women only), occupational exposure, medical history, and family history of cancer. Information on current diet and consumption of beverages was assessed via a 165-item food frequency questionnaire that had been validated against a series of 24-hour dietary recall interviews and selected biomarker studies conducted on random subsets of cohort participants.15–17 Blood and urine samples were initially collected from a 3% random sample of cohort participants in 1994–1999. Beginning in 2000, we extended blood and urine collection to all surviving cohort participants. Of the 52,322 eligible subjects, 28,346 subjects (54% of eligible) donated blood samples. The study participants who provided blood samples were younger (mean ± standard deviation: 60.9 ± 7.7 versus 62.4 ± 8.2 years), more educated (33.6% versus 25.1% having secondary or higher education), and more likely to be men than those who did not provide biospecimens (45.5% versus 39.1%), and were otherwise similar in smoking (32% versus 30.2% ever smokers) and alcohol consumption (18.3% versus 14.8% weekly consumers of alcohol). The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the respective institutions.
Assessment of Lung Cancer Cases
Identification of incident cases of cancer and death was accomplished by annual record linkage of all surviving cohort participants with the database of the nationwide Singapore Cancer Registry and the Birth and Death Registry that have complete records of incident cancer and death cases, respectivley.18 To date, only 47 (<1%) of the entire cohort participants were known to be lost to follow-up due to migration out of Singapore, suggesting that the ascertainment of cancer and death incidences among the cohort participants was virtually complete. As of December 2015, with an average follow-up of 11.8 years after their donation of blood sample, 654 developed lung cancer among 26,761 subjects after excluding 1,585 participants with a history of cancer at the time of blood collection. Of the 654 lung cancer cases, 573 (87.6%) were histopathologically confirmed while the remaining 81 (12.4%) were diagnosed with radiography or computer-assisted tomography evidence. Among the histopathologically confirmed cases, 279 (48.7%) were adenocarcinomas, 113 (19.7%) were squamous cell carcinomas, 56 (9.8%) were small cell cancers, and 125 (21.8%) were other cell types.
Measurements of Telomere Length
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using QIAamp 96 DNA Blood kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Telomere length was measured using a validated monochrome multiplex qPCR method.19 This method measures the relative average telomere length in genomic DNA by determining the ratio of telomere repeat copy number (T) to single (albumin) gene copy number (S) in experimental samples relative to a reference sample. The DNA sample for the standard curve was composed of an equimolar pool of 77 samples selected from participants of the Singapore Chinese Health Study who were identified in a prior study; the telomere length values of all the 77 samples were within 10% of the population mean. This pooled DNA sample was run on all qPCR plates: 8 replicates for each of four concentrations (4, 0.8, 0.16, and 0.032 ng/μl). Thermal cycling was carried out on an Applied Biosystem 7900 HT instrument, using PCR cycling conditions as described.19 Real-time PCR cycle thresholds, determined independently for the albumin gene (ALB) and telomere (TEL) amplification traces for all wells (experimental and standard DNA samples), were used to calculate telomere length as described previously19 with the 384-well plate-based normalization of telomere length, which was more robust than the overall standard-curve based normalization. All experimental DNA samples were assayed in duplicate, and the average value of the two replicates was used for final analysis for each subject. The mean coefficient of variation, as a measure of reproducibility, of all technical sample duplicates for telomere length in the present study was 3.5%.
Statistical Analysis
The χ2 test was used to compare the distributions of selected variables between lung cancer case groups and non-cases whereas The t test and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) method were used to examine the difference in telomere lengths between two groups or among 3 or more groups.
The present analysis included 26,540 subjects after excluding 221 subjects with unavailable telomere length measurement due to assay problems. For each subject, person-years at risk were computed from the date of blood draw to the date of lung cancer diagnosis, death, migration out of Singapore, or December 31, 2015, whichever occurred first. Cox proportional hazard regression method was employed for calculation of hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of lung adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and other or unknown histological types of lung cancer separately associated with higher telomere length quintiles comparing with the lowest quintile of telomere length. Test for linear trend was conducted by treating the quintiles of telomere length as an ordinal variable in the Cox model. The proportional hazards assumption was examined and valid. In all analyses, we adjusted for smoking history by including categorical terms of average number of cigarettes smoked per day (never smokers, 1–12, 13–22, or 23+), number of years of smoking (never smokers, 1–19, 20–39, or 40+), and number of years since last smoked for quitters (current smokers, <1, 1–4, 5–19, 20+ years since last smoked, or never smokers). Other potential confounders included in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were age, sex, dialect group (Hokkiens or Cantonese), level of education (no formal education, primary school, secondary or higher education), body mass index (<20, 20-<24, 24-<28, or ≥28 kg/m2), and alcohol consumption (Non-drinkers, <7, or ≥7 drinks per week). Sensitivity analyses were performed for never smokers versus ever smokes, men versus women, and for longer versus shorter duration of follow-up.
The cumulative incidence rates of lung adenocarcinoma for individuals with shorter and longer telomeres were estimated using a competing risk method described by Gaynor et al.20 We estimated the cumulative incidence rate of lung adenocarcinoma for smokers and non-smokers separately with short (the lowest quintile of telomere length), intermediate (the 2nd to 4th quintiles of telomere length) and long telomeres (the highest quintile of telomere length) adjusted for competing risk of death using a SAS Software Macro described by Beiser et al.21
Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All P-values reported are two-sided, and those less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
The mean age (standard deviation) at cancer diagnosis of all lung cancer patients (n = 654) was 73.2 (7.0) years. The median time interval between blood draw and cancer diagnosis was 6.8 years (range: 1 month to 21.1 years).
The distributions of selected demographics and lifestyle factors in lung cancer patients compared with the remaining participants of the cohort are shown in Table 1. Compared with non-cases, lung cancer cases overall had significantly higher percentages of former (21.1%) and current (48.5%) smokers (P < 0.001). Among ever smokers, lung cancer patients reported more numbers of cigarettes smoked per day, years of smoking, and pack-years of smoking than non-cases (all P values < 0.001). The percentage of regular alcohol drinkers was slightly higher in lung cancer cases than in non-cases (Table 1). Among 3 histological groups of lung cancer, patients with adenocarcinoma were younger, more likely to be women and never smokers compared to those with squamous cell carcinoma or other/unknown histological types of lung cancer (Table 1).
Table 1.
Characteristics of lung cancer cases by common histology type comparing with non-cancer cases The Singapore Chinese Health Study 1993–2015
Characteristics* | Non-cancer | Adenocarcinoma | Squamous cell cancer | Cancer of other or unknown histology | P† | P‡ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of subjects | 25,886 | 288 | 113 | 253 | … | … |
Mean age (SD), years | 62.7 (7.6) | 65.5 (7.1) | 67.0 (6.6) | 68.3 (6.7) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Sex, % | ||||||
Men | 45.5 | 59.4 | 85.8 | 74.3 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Women | 54.5 | 40.3 | 14.2 | 25.7 | ||
Mean body mass index (SD), kg/m2 | 23.3 (3.5) | 22.5 (3.3) | 22.7 (3.9) | 22.5 (3.8) | 0.8955 | <0.0001 |
Level of education, % | ||||||
No formal education | 20.7 | 22.6 | 21.2 | 27.3 | ||
Primary (1–6 years) | 45.2 | 52.4 | 62.0 | 50.2 | 0.1843 | <0.0001 |
Secondary and above | 34.1 | 25.0 | 16.8 | 22.5 | ||
Smoking status (%) | ||||||
Never smokers | 68.9 | 47.9 | 8.8 | 20.2 | ||
Former smokers | 15.7 | 17.4 | 31.0 | 20.9 | <0.001 | <0.0001 |
Current smokers | 15.4 | 34.7 | 60.2 | 58.9 | ||
Mean cigarettes/day (SD)§ | 16.7 (12.7) | 21.8 (14.8) | 22.0 (16.2) | 19.3 (13.1) | 0.1636 | <0.0001 |
Mean years of smoking (SD)§ | 33.7 (14.1) | 40.2 (12.5) | 42.8 (11.6) | 44.0 (10.9) | 0.0099 | <0.0001 |
Mean pack-years of smoking (SD)‡ | 29.7 (27.2) | 43.4 (30.8) | 47.0 (36.3) | 41.8 (28.1) | 0.3776 | <0.0001 |
Alcohol consumption | ||||||
Non-drinkers | 81.4 | 78.5 | 77.9 | 80.3 | ||
<7 drinks/week | 14.2 | 13.9 | 9.7 | 13.8 | 0.2409 | <0.0001 |
≥7 drinks/week | 4.4 | 7.6 | 12.4 | 5.9 |
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation.
Two-sided Ps comparing among 3 groups of lung cancer cases by histology type were based on analysis of variance for continuous variables or chi-square test for categorical variables.
Two-sided Ps comparing total cancer cases (n = 654) with non-cancer cases were based on t test for continuous variables or chi-square test for categorical variables.
Among former and current smokers only.
The telomeres shortened with increasing age in both men and women of all study subjects included (Figure 1) or lung cancer cases (Supplemental Figure 1). Age explained 5.7% and 6.6% variability in telomere length for women and men, respectively. Overall the mean (standard deviation) of relative telomere length measured in 71–74 years old was 0.94 (0.20) compared with 1.18 (0.28) in 46–50 years old. Individuals in the lowest quintile of telomere length (median 0.76, range 0.19–0.83) were 5.8 years older than those in the highest quintile of telomere length (median 1.30, range 1.19–3.24) (Table 2). There were significantly higher proportions of women, higher level of education, weekly vigorous work or strenuous sports, and never smokers in the highest quintile than in the lowest quintile of telomere length. Ever smokers with the lowest quintile of telomere length smoked more numbers of cigarettes per day, years of smoking, and pack-years of smoking than their counterparts with the highest quintile of telomere length. The proportion of drinkers consuming 7 or more alcoholic beverages per week was highest in lowest quintile of telomere length.
Figure 1.
Correlation between age and relative telomere length in peripheral blood leukocytes in men and women, the Singapore Chinese Health Study 1993–2015. The red color denotes for women and the black color for men.
Table 2.
Baseline characteristics of all participants by relative telomere length The Singapore Chinese Health Study, 1993–2015
Characteristics | Total No. of Subjects | Relative telomere length in quintile [median] and (range) | Pvalues | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
1st [0.76] (0.19–0.83) | 2nd [0.89] (0.84–0.96) | 3rd [1.00] (0.95–1.05) | 4th [1.11] (1.05–1.19) | 5th [1.30] (1.19–3.24) | |||
Number of subjects | 26,540 | 5,308 | 5,308 | 5,308 | 5,308 | 5,308 | |
Age in years, mean (SD) | 26,540 | 65.9 (7.8) | 63.8 (7.6) | 62.7 (7.5) | 61.5 (7.2) | 60.1 (6.9) | <0.0001 |
Female sex, n (%) | 14,306 | 2,379 (44.8) | 2,666 (50.2) | 2,823 (53.2) | 3,135 (59.1) | 3,303 (62.2) | <0.0001 |
Level of education | |||||||
No formal education, n (%) | 5,525 | 1,195 (22.5) | 1,122 (21.1) | 1,086 (20.5) | 1,091 (20.6) | 1,031 (19.4) | |
Primary school, n (%) | 12,032 | 2,528 (47.6) | 2,365 (44.6) | 2,408 (45.4) | 2,389 (45.0) | 2,342 (44.1) | <0.0001 |
Secondary school or higher, n (%) | 8,983 | 1,585 (29.9) | 1,821 (34.3) | 1,814 (34.2) | 1,828 (34.4) | 1,935 (36.5) | |
BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 26,540 | 23.1 (3.5) | 23.2 (3.5) | 23.3 (3.5) | 23.4 (3.5) | 23.3 (3.5) | 0.0008 |
Weekly vigorous work or strenuous sports, n (%) | 4,172 | 803 (15.1) | 797 (15.0) | 818 (15.4) | 858 (16.2) | 896 (16.9) | 0.0411 |
Smoking status | |||||||
Never smoker, n (%) | 18,021 | 3,200 (60.3) | 3,455 (65.1) | 3,611 (68.0) | 3,813 (71.8) | 3,942 (74.3) | |
Former smoker, n (%) | 4,207 | 1129 (21.3) | 925 (17.4) | 802 (15.1) | 709 (13.4) | 642 (12.1) | <0.0001 |
Current smoker, n (%) | 4,312 | 979 (18.4) | 928 (17.5) | 895 (16.9) | 786 (14.8) | 724 (13.6) | |
Cigarettes/day, mean (SD)† | 8,519 | 17.6 (13.2) | 16.7 (12.8) | 17.1 (12.9) | 16.5 (12.6) | 16.4 (12.6) | 0.0360 |
Years of smoking, mean (SD)† | 8,519 | 36.3 (14.6) | 34.7 (14.7) | 34.1 (13.7) | 32.5 (13.3) | 31.8 (13.6) | <0.0001 |
Pack-years of smoking, mean (SD)† | 8,519 | 33.6 (29.1) | 30.8 (28.6) | 30.5 (27.5) | 28.0 (25.0) | 27.9 (25.9) | <0.0001 |
Alcohol consumption status | |||||||
Non-drinkers, n (%) | 21,577 | 4,321 (81.4) | 4,311 (81.2) | 4,309 (81.2) | 4,321 (81.4) | 4,315 (81.3) | |
<7 drinks/week, n (%) | 3,772 | 706 (13.3) | 745 (14.0) | 742 (14.0) | 781(14.7) | 798 (15.0) | 0.0003 |
≥7 drinks/week, n (%) | 1,191 | 281 (5.3) | 252 (4.8) | 257 (4.8) | 206 (3.9) | 195 (3.7) | |
Ethanol intake (g/day), mean (SD)‡ | 4,963 | 10.6 (16.5) | 9.2 (15.2) | 10.2 (16.9) | 7.9 (13.6) | 8.6 (15.0) | 0.0003 |
Among former and current smokers only.
Among drinkers only.
The mean relative telomere length was 1.022 (95% CI = 1.005, 1.039) in all lung cancer cases and 0.995 (95% CI = 0.992, 0.997) in non-cases (P = 0.0016) after adjustment for age, sex, education, BMI, number of cigarettes per day, number of years of smoking, and number of years since quitting smoking (for former smokers only). Longer telomeres were significantly associated with higher risk of lung adenocarcinoma after adjustment for multiple confounders or age alone (Supplemental Table 1). Compared with the lowest quintile, subjects with the highest quintile of telomere length showed a 2.8 times greater risk of developing lung adenocarcinoma (Ptrend < 0.0001) after adjustment for multiple potential confounders (Table 3). Telomere length was not associated with risk of lung squamous carcinoma or other/unknown histological type of lung cancer after adjustment for age alone or multiple confounders (Supplemental Table 1, Table 3).
Table 3.
Hazard ratio (HR) of lung cancer by histological subtype in relation to relative telomere length The Singapore Chinese Health Study 1993–2015
Relative telomere length in quintile | Person-years | Adenocarcinoma | Squamous cell cancer | Cancer of other/unknown histology | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
No | HR (95% CI)* | No | HR (95% CI)* | No | HR (95% CI)* | ||
All subjects | |||||||
1st (shortest) | 59,803 | 44 | 1.00 | 28 | 1.00 | 72 | 1.00 |
2nd | 62,041 | 50 | 1.29 (0.86, 1.94) | 32 | 1.43 (0.86, 2.37) | 56 | 0.96 (0.68, 1.37) |
3rd | 63,019 | 63 | 1.75 (1.18, 2.57) | 19 | 0.96 (0.53, 1.73) | 51 | 1.01 (0.71, 1.45) |
4th | 63,989 | 48 | 1.51 (1.00, 2.29) | 18 | 1.11 (0.61, 2.02) | 37 | 0.89 (0.59, 1.33) |
5th (longest) | 65,355 | 83 | 2.84 (1.94, 4.15) | 16 | 1.13 (0.60, 2.13) | 37 | 1.05 (0.69, 1.58) |
P trend | <0.0001 | 0.9886 | 0.9714 |
Adjusted for age, sex, dialect group, education, body mass index, number of cigarettes per day, and number of years of smoking, number of years since quitting smoking (for former smokers only), and alcohol consumption.
A statistically significant, positive association between telomere length and risk of lung adenocarcinoma was present in both never (HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.80–5.49 comparing the highest with the lowest quintile, Ptrend<0.0001) and ever smokers (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.45–4.18, Ptrend=0.0010) (Table 4). A similar association was seen in men (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.46–3.74, Ptrend=0.0003) and women (HR 4.26, 95% 2.11–8.61, Ptrend<0.0001). When data were analyzed by the duration of follow-up, the associations between longer telomeres and higher risk of lung adenocarcinoma were comparable for the longer duration (5+ years) (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.59–3.82, Ptrend=0.0001) with the shorter duration (<5 years) of follow-up (HR 4.19, 95% CI 1.96–8.96, Ptrend=0.0002). We conducted similar subgroup analyses and did not find any statistically significant association between telomere length and risk of squamous cell carcinoma or other/unknown histological types of lung cancer (all Ptrend >0.50, Supplemental Tables 2 and 3).
Table 4.
Hazard ratio (HR) of lung adenocarcinoma in relation to relative telomere length by smoking status, gender and duration of follow-up The Singapore Chinese Health Study 1993–2015
Relative telomere length in quintile | Person-years | No. of adenocarcinoma | HR (95% CI)* | P for trend |
---|---|---|---|---|
Never smokers | ||||
1st (shortest) | 37,950 | 18 | 1.00 | <0.0001 |
2nd | 42,057 | 21 | 1.22 (0.65, 2.29) | |
3rd | 44,479 | 26 | 1.53 (0.84, 2.81) | |
4th | 47,059 | 23 | 1.39 (0.74, 2.60) | |
5th (longest) | 49,727 | 50 | 3.14 (1.80, 5.49) | |
Ever smokers | ||||
1st (shortest) | 21,854 | 26 | 1.00 | 0.0010 |
2nd | 19,984 | 29 | 1.37 (0.80, 2.32) | |
3rd | 18,540 | 37 | 1.93 (1.16, 3.20) | |
4th | 16,930 | 25 | 1.63 (0.93, 2.85) | |
5th (longest) | 15,628 | 33 | 2.46 (1.45, 4.18) | |
Males | ||||
1st (shortest) | 31,406 | 34 | 1.00 | 0.0003 |
2nd | 29,425 | 29 | 1.04 (0.63, 1.70) | |
3rd | 27,902 | 39 | 1.55 (0.97, 2.47) | |
4th | 25,261 | 28 | 1.39 (0.83, 2.30) | |
5th (longest) | 23,602 | 41 | 2.33 (1.46, 3.74) | |
Females | ||||
1st (shortest) | 28,397 | 10 | 1.00 | <0.0001 |
2nd | 32,616 | 21 | 2.09 (0.98, 4.44) | |
3rd | 35,117 | 24 | 2.37 (1.13, 4.96) | |
4th | 38,728 | 20 | 1.99 (0.93, 4.29) | |
5th (longest) | 41,753 | 42 | 4.26 (2.11, 8.61) | |
<5 years of follow-up | ||||
1st (shortest) | 25,007 | 10 | 1.00 | 0.0002 |
2nd | 25,399 | 14 | 1.64 (0.73, 3.69) | |
3rd | 25,478 | 18 | 2.37 (1.09, 5.16) | |
4th | 25,561 | 13 | 2.00 (0.87, 4.62) | |
5th (longest) | 25,611 | 24 | 4.19 (1.96, 8.96) | |
≥5 years of follow-up | ||||
1st (shortest) | 34,796 | 34 | 1.00 | 0.0001 |
2nd | 36,641 | 36 | 1.19 (0.74, 1.90) | |
3rd | 37,541 | 45 | 1.56 (1.00, 2.45) | |
4th | 38,428 | 35 | 1.36 (0.84, 2.20) | |
5th (longest) | 39,744 | 59 | 2.46 (1.59, 3.82) |
Adjusted for age, sex, dialect group, education, body mass index, number of cigarettes per day, and number of years of smoking, number of years since quitting smoking (for former smokers only), and alcohol consumption.
The cumulative incidence rates of lung adenocarcinoma are shown in Figure 2 for ever smokers and never smokers separately with different levels of telomere length after taking into account the competing risk of death from other causes. Higher incidence rates of lung adenocarcinoma were seen in both never and ever smokers with longer telomeres compared to those with shorter telomeres. For example, the cumulative incidence rates of lung adenocarcinoma were 0.79% (95% CI 0.38–1.21%), 1.08% (95% CI 0.71–1.45%) and 2.16% (95% CI 1.46–2.87%), respectively, in never smokers with the lowest, intermediate (2nd–4th quintile) and highest quintile of telomere length by the age of 80 years. The corresponding figures in ever smokers were at 1.15% (95% CI 0.59–1.72%), 2.55% (95% CI 1.95–3.15%), and 4.12% (95% CI 2.67–5.58%).
Figure 2.
Cumulative incidence rate of lung adenocarcinoma in never and ever smokers by categories of relative telomere length in peripheral blood leukocytes after adjustment for competing risk of death in the Singapore Chinese Health 1993–2015. The green color denotes for the short telomeres (Q1: the lowest quintile of telomere length), the purple color for the intermediante telomeres (Q2–Q4: the 2nd–4th quintile of telomere length), and the red color for the long telomeres (Q5: the highest quintile of telomere length). The solid lines denote for ever smokers and dask lines for never smokers.
DISCUSSION
In this population-based prospective cohort study of 26,540 individuals with an average follow-up of 12 years, we showed that longer telomeres in peripheral blood leukocytes were associated with significantly increased risk of developing lung adenocarcinoma, but not with squamous cell carcinoma or other histological types of cancer. This positive association between telomere length and lung adenocarcinoma risk was present in sub-populations by smoking status, gender and the duration of follow-up. Our results are consistent with findings from Mendelian randomization studies.11–13 It is worth noting that two of these reports were based on virtually the same study subjects.12, 13
Is telomere length in peripheral blood leukocytes a valid surrogate marker for target tissues such as the lung? Telomere length varies across different somatic tissues dependent on their replicative activities. Telomere length in peripheral blood leukocytes and in the lung and skin tissues is usually shorter than those in the muscle and fat tissues because the former have higher proliferating potential than the latter.22, 23 Within a given individual, telomere lengths in different organs and tissue types are highly correlated with each other. Several human studies have showed that telomere length in peripheral blood leukocytes was positively correlated with telomere length in buccal cells,24 fibroblasts,24 skin,25, 26 and synovial membrane.25 One study showed a high correlation for telomere length in peripheral blood leukocytes with the muscle cells (r2=0.71), fat (r2=0.69), and skin (r2 =0.69) (all Ps <0.0001).23 Furthermore, telomere length in both skin and skeletal muscle cells was highly correlated with that in the lung tissue (r2 ≥ 0.77) after controlling for chronological age.22 These results strongly suggest that peripheral blood leukocytes are good surrogates for lung and other tissue types in the measurement of telomere length.
Several epidemiological studies have examined and reported inconsistent associations between peripheral blood leukocyte telomere length and lung cancer risk. One of the chief reasons for these inconsistencies may stem from study design. Retrospective case-control studies often reported an increased risk of lung cancer with shorter telomeres.27–29 Telomere shorting may occur after diagnosis due to treatment or disease progression.30 A recent study reported significantly shorter telomeres in patients with advanced stage of lung cancer than those with early stage lung cancer, suggesting that tumor progression may impact peripheral blood leukocyte telomere length.29 Thus retrospective studies, in which blood samples were collected from patients after cancer diagnosis or treatment, would yield shorter telomeres than those in pre-diagnosed blood samples, resulting in a spurious elevation in risk of lung cancer associated with shorter telomeres.
Prospective studies, in which blood samples are collected from study subjects before their cancer diagnosis, avoid such a shortcoming. There have been two prospective cohort studies on telomere length and risk of total or lung cancer incidence. The earlier study reported a two-fold increased risk of total cancer incidence for the shortest third compared with the longest third of peripheral blood leukocyte telomeres, but that study suffered from a very small sample size with only 787 total subjects and 92 total cancer cases.31 The later cohort study in a general population in Copenhagen with a large sample size did not find a statistically significant association between peripheral blood leukocyte telomere lengths and risk of total cancer or lung cancer incidence.32, 33 However all these analyses did not separate cases of adenocarcinoma from squamous cell carcinoma or other histological types of lung cancer. In addition, three case-control studies of lung cancer nested in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study,34 the Shanghai Women’s Health Study,35 and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial36 all reported a significantly positive association between baseline peripheral blood leukocyte telomere length and risk of lung cancer. In the pooled analysis of these 3 case-control studies, Seow et al reported a statistically significant increased risk of lung adenocarcinoma, but not squamous cell carcinoma, in individuals with longer peripheral blood leukocyte telomeres.36 Our results are consistent with this pooled analysis of 3 prospective case-control studies.
Studies using genetic variants as proxy measures for telomere length could avoid the biases due to disease progression and treatment, and other attributes to telomere shortening, such as aging and oxidative stress, since genetic variants are unchanged by these factors. A summed genetic score of various single genetic polymorphisms in TERT, TERC and other candidate genes for longer telomeres, identified in a genome-wide association study,37 was significantly associated with increased risk of lung cancer among never-smoking Asian women11 and increased risk of lung cancer and melanoma in the Copenhagen cohort study.33 More recently, two separate reports based on the Mendelian randomization study of the same genome-wide association studies of lung cancer reported that genetic allele scores for longer telomeres were significantly associated with increased risk of lung adenocarcinoma, but was not associated with squamous cell carcinoma.12, 13 Consistent with those of previous studies, our prospective cohort study in a single ethnic population further support the results that longer peripheral blood leukocyte telomeres are associated with increased risk of lung adenocarcinoma.
The biological mechanism linking longer telomeres to lung carcinogenesis is unclear. Shorter telomeres may act as tumor suppressors38 that can protect against carcinogenesis by triggering programmed cell death in the presence of functional cell cycle checkpoints and intact apoptotic pathways.39 In contrast, cells with longer telomeres have higher proliferative capacity. Each round of genome replication has the potential to introduce genetic mutations and chromosomal alterations, which may promote malignant transformation.40 Alternatively peripheral blood leukocyte telomere length may serve as an indicator of other factors for risk of lung cancer. Clinical studies have found a statistically significant association between telomere length and higher percentage of regulatory T cells (Treg) in the blood from patients with hepatocellular or renal cell carcinoma.41, 42 High levels of Treg have been detected in various cancers and Treg are proposed to play an important role in immune suppression, thereby establishing tumor immune tolerance.43 The proportion of Treg was significantly higher in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with adenocarcinoma than those with squamous cell carcinoma.44 This may contribute to the observed positive association for peripheral blood leukocyte telomere length with the risk of lung adenocarcinoma, but a null association with the risk of squamous cell carcinoma. Future studies are warranted to clarify the association between peripheral blood leukocyte telomeres and risk of subtype lung cancer.
The present study has several strengths. The prospective design minimized the potential impact of progression and treatment of lung cancer on telomere length, since telomere length was determined many years before diagnosis of lung cancer. The quantification of telomere length for the entire cohort allowed for the estimation of cumulative absolute risk of lung adenocarcinoma after taking into account for competing risk of death, minimizing the potential for inflating the estimate of cumulative incidence risk.21 The direct quantification of telomere length in a homogenous Chinese population eliminated potential confounding by pleiotropy, population stratification, and ancestry that are present in the Mendelian randomization studies. The long-term and complete follow-up further reduced potential bias due to the impact of undiagnosed lung cancer on telomere length. The relatively large number of lung cancer cases provided sufficient statistical power to yield robust risk estimates of lung adenocarcinoma in sub-population by smoking status, gender and duration of follow-up. Our study also has some limitations. As with any observational studies, our results are subject to residual confounding by both measured and unmeasured confounders in the study population. Another limitation is whether the telomere length in peripheral blood leukocytes reflects the telomere length in the lung, although previous studies have shown high correlation of telomere length measures between the two tissue types.22, 23 The relatively small number of lung squamous cell carcinoma may be one possible reason for a null association with telomere length.
In summary, the present study demonstrates a dose-dependent association for telomere length in peripheral blood leukocytes at baseline with increased risk of lung adenocarcinoma. Our findings and those from previous prospective studies and Mendelian randomization studies support a potential etiological role of telomere length in the development of lung adenocarcinoma. Future research efforts need to be undertaken to elucidate the biological mechanism for telomeres in the development of lung adenocarcinoma.
Supplementary Material
NOVELTY AND IMPACT.
The role of telomere length in the development of cancer is intriguing, given the inconsistent results from early retrospective observational studies and more recent prospective and Mendelian randomization studies. This prospective cohort study demonstrates a robust, positive association between direct measurement of telomere length in peripheral blood leukocytes and the risk of developing lung adenocarcinoma. Consistent with results of recent prospective and Mendelian randomization studies, the findings of the present study support a potential etiological role of telomere length in the development of lung adenocarcinoma.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Bennet Van Houten of University of Pittsburgh for his review and provide insightful comment on the manuscript, Shalane Porter and Dinesha Walek of the University of Minnesota Genetic Center for measuring telomere length using the qPCR method. We also thank Siew-Hong Low of the National University of Singapore for supervising the field work of the Singapore Chinese Health Study.
Grant support: This work was supported by the United States NIH grant no. R01 CA144034 and UM1 CA182876, and the Singapore National Medical Research Council (NMRC/CSA/0055/2013)
References
- 1.Forman D, Ferlay J. The global and regional burden of cancer. In: Stewart BW, Wild CP, editors. World Cancer Report 2014. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014. pp. 16–53. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.SEER. Cancer Stat Facts: Lung and Bronchus Cancer. 2017 ( https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/lungb.html)
- 4.Meza R, Meernik C, Jeon J, Cote ML. Lung cancer incidence trends by gender, race and histology in the United States, 1973–2010. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0121323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.de Lange T. Shelterin: the protein complex that shapes and safeguards human telomeres. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2100–10. doi: 10.1101/gad.1346005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Palm W, de Lange T. How shelterin protects mammalian telomeres. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:301–34. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Blackburn EH, Greider CW, Szostak JW. Telomeres and telomerase: the path from maize, Tetrahymena and yeast to human cancer and aging. Nat Med. 2006;12:1133–8. doi: 10.1038/nm1006-1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shawi M, Autexier C. Telomerase, senescence and ageing. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008;129:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2007.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stewart SA, Weinberg RA. Telomeres: cancer to human aging. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006;22:531–57. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.O’Sullivan RJ, Karlseder J. Telomeres: protecting chromosomes against genome instability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:171–81. doi: 10.1038/nrm2848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Machiela MJ, Hsiung CA, Shu XO, Seow WJ, Wang Z, Matsuo K, Hong YC, Seow A, Wu C, Hosgood HD, 3rd, Chen K, Wang JC, et al. Genetic variants associated with longer telomere length are associated with increased lung cancer risk among never-smoking women in Asia: a report from the female lung cancer consortium in Asia. Int J Cancer. 2015;137:311–9. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang C, Doherty JA, Burgess S, Hung RJ, Lindstrom S, Kraft P, Gong J, Amos CI, Sellers TA, Monteiro AN, Chenevix-Trench G, Bickeboller H, et al. Genetic determinants of telomere length and risk of common cancers: a Mendelian randomization study. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:5356–66. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Telomeres Mendelian Randomization Collaboration. Haycock PC, Burgess S, Nounu A, Zheng J, Okoli GN, Bowden J, Wade KH, Timpson NJ, Evans DM, Willeit P, Aviv A, et al. Association Between Telomere Length and Risk of Cancer and Non-Neoplastic Diseases: A Mendelian Randomization Study. JAMA Oncol. 2017 doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yuan J-M, Stram DO, Arakawa K, Lee HP, Yu MC. Dietary cryptoxanthin and reduced risk of lung cancer: the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:890–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hankin JH, Stram DO, Arakawa K, Park S, Low SH, Lee HP, Yu MC. Singapore Chinese Health Study: development, validation, and calibration of the quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Nutr Cancer. 2001;39:187–95. doi: 10.1207/S15327914nc392_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Seow A, Shi CY, Franke AA, Hankin JH, Lee HP, Yu MC. Isoflavonoid levels in spot urine are associated with frequency of dietary soy intake in a population-based sample of middle-aged and older Chinese in Singapore. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998;7:135–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Seow A, Shi CY, Chung FL, Jiao D, Hankin JH, Lee HP, Coetzee GA, Yu MC. Urinary total isothiocyanate (ITC) in a population-based sample of middle-aged and older Chinese in Singapore: relationship with dietary total ITC and glutathione S-transferase M1/T1/P1 genotypes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998;7:775–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Storm H. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. I to VIII. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cawthon RM. Telomere length measurement by a novel monochrome multiplex quantitative PCR method. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:e21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gaynor JJ, Feuer EJ, Tan CC, Wu DH, Little CR, Straus DJ, Clarkson BD, Brennan MF. On the Use of Cause-Specific Failure and Conditional Failure Probabilities - Examples from Clinical Oncology Data. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;88:400–9. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Beiser A, D’Agostino RB, Sr, Seshadri S, Sullivan LM, Wolf PA. Computing estimates of incidence, including lifetime risk: Alzheimer’s disease in the Framingham Study. The Practical Incidence Estimators (PIE) macro. Stat Med. 2000;19:1495–522. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000615/30)19:11/12<1495::aid-sim441>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gardner JP, Kimura M, Chai W, Durrani JF, Tchakmakjian L, Cao X, Lu X, Li G, Peppas AP, Skurnick J, Wright WE, Shay JW, et al. Telomere dynamics in macaques and humans. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:367–74. doi: 10.1093/gerona/62.4.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Daniali L, Benetos A, Susser E, Kark JD, Labat C, Kimura M, Desai K, Granick M, Aviv A. Telomeres shorten at equivalent rates in somatic tissues of adults. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1597. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gadalla SM, Cawthon R, Giri N, Alter BP, Savage SA. Telomere length in blood, buccal cells, and fibroblasts from patients with inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. Aging. 2010;2:867–74. doi: 10.18632/aging.100235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Friedrich U, Griese E, Schwab M, Fritz P, Thon K, Klotz U. Telomere length in different tissues of elderly patients. Mech Ageing Dev. 2000;119:89–99. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(00)00173-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Granick M, Kimura M, Kim S, Daniali L, Cao X, Herbig U, Aviv A. Telomere dynamics in keloids. Eplasty. 2011;11:e15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jang JS, Choi YY, Lee WK, Choi JE, Cha SI, Kim YJ, Kim CH, Kam S, Jung TH, Park JY. Telomere length and the risk of lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:1385–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00831.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sanchez-Espiridion B, Chen M, Chang JY, Lu C, Chang DW, Roth JA, Wu X, Gu J. Telomere length in peripheral blood leukocytes and lung cancer risk: a large case-control study in Caucasians. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2476–86. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Qian Y, Ding T, Wei L, Cao S, Yang L. Shorter telomere length of T-cells in peripheral blood of patients with lung cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:2675–82. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S98488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee JJ, Nam CE, Cho SH, Park KS, Chung IJ, Kim HJ. Telomere length shortening in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy. Ann Hematol. 2003;82:492–5. doi: 10.1007/s00277-003-0691-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Willeit P, Willeit J, Mayr A, Weger S, Oberhollenzer F, Brandstatter A, Kronenberg F, Kiechl S. Telomere length and risk of incident cancer and cancer mortality. JAMA. 2010;304:69–75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Weischer M, Nordestgaard BG, Cawthon RM, Freiberg JJ, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Bojesen SE. Short telomere length, cancer survival, and cancer risk in 47102 individuals. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:459–68. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rode L, Nordestgaard BG, Bojesen SE. Long telomeres and cancer risk among 95 568 individuals from the general population. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45:1634–43. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Shen M, Cawthon R, Rothman N, Weinstein SJ, Virtamo J, Hosgood HD, 3rd, Hu W, Lim U, Albanes D, Lan Q. A prospective study of telomere length measured by monochrome multiplex quantitative PCR and risk of lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2011;73:133–7. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lan Q, Cawthon R, Gao Y, Hu W, Hosgood HD, 3rd, Barone-Adesi F, Ji BT, Bassig B, Chow WH, Shu X, Cai Q, Xiang Y, et al. Longer telomere length in peripheral white blood cells is associated with risk of lung cancer and the rs2736100 (CLPTM1L-TERT) polymorphism in a prospective cohort study among women in China. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e59230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Seow WJ, Cawthon RM, Purdue MP, Hu W, Gao YT, Huang WY, Weinstein SJ, Ji BT, Virtamo J, Hosgood HD, 3rd, Bassig BA, Shu XO, et al. Telomere length in white blood cell DNA and lung cancer: a pooled analysis of three prospective cohorts. Cancer Res. 2014;74:4090–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Codd V, Nelson CP, Albrecht E, Mangino M, Deelen J, Buxton JL, Hottenga JJ, Fischer K, Esko T, Surakka I, Broer L, Nyholt DR, et al. Identification of seven loci affecting mean telomere length and their association with disease. Nat Genet. 2013;45:422–7. 7e1–2. doi: 10.1038/ng.2528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Maciejowski J, de Lange T. Telomeres in cancer: tumour suppression and genome instability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18:175–86. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.d’Adda di Fagagna F, Reaper PM, Clay-Farrace L, Fiegler H, Carr P, Von Zglinicki T, Saretzki G, Carter NP, Jackson SP. A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescence. Nature. 2003;426:194–8. doi: 10.1038/nature02118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tomasetti C, Vogelstein B. Cancer etiology. Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions. Science. 2015;347:78–81. doi: 10.1126/science.1260825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liu HQ, An JZ, Liu J, Yang YF, Zhang HX, Zhao BY, Li JB, Yang HS, Chen ZN, Xing JL. Leukocyte telomere length predicts overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:1040–5. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Svenson U, Gronlund E, Soderstrom I, Sitaram RT, Ljungberg B, Roos G. Telomere length in relation to immunological parameters in patients with renal cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e55543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Facciabene A, Motz GT, Coukos G. T-regulatory cells: key players in tumor immune escape and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2012;72:2162–71. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Osinska I, Stelmaszczyk-Emmel A, Polubiec-Kownacka M, Dziedzic D, Domagala-Kulawik J. CD4+/CD25(high)/FoxP3+/CD127− regulatory T cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of lung cancer patients. Hum Immunol. 2016;77:912–5. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.07.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.