Summary
Background
Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata (LPD) is a rare condition characterized by formation of multiple leiomyomas in the abdominal and pelvic peritoneum. Malignant transformation of LPD is an extremely rare occurrence. We hereby report a case of a middle-aged female who was subsequently diagnosed with leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata with a few of the lesions showing malignant transformation.
Case Report
A forty-year-old female with a history of hysterectomy presenting with vague abdominal pain was completely evaluated with ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and was subsequently diagnosed with leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata. The imaging findings of leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata were correlated with and confirmed by a histopathologic examination of the excision biopsy specimen.
Conclusions
The imaging findings were found to be specific for leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata with a malignant transformation.
Keywords: Hysterectomy, Leiomyomatosis, Peritoneum
Background
Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata is a rare disease of smooth muscle cells characterized by formation of multiple nodular masses in the peritoneum, seen almost exclusively in females, particularly of child-bearing potential and middle-aged. Malignant degeneration is an unusual complication of leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata, with only three cases reported in the literature so far. This entity can be easily misdiagnosed as a metastasis of an unknown primary without typical history leading to false positive diagnoses and inadvertent surgeries. In this article, we report a case of a female patient with a remote history of hysterectomy for uterine fibroid who was subsequently diagnosed with LPD with a malignant transformation.
Case Report
A forty-year-old woman presented to our department with vague abdominal pain for 7 months. She had a prior history of hysterectomy for multiple uterine fibroids three years earlier and was a regular oral contraceptive pill user. Plain abdominal radiograph of the patient was normal. On ultrasound, multiple, well-defined, lobulated, solid, hypoechoic mass lesions were noted in the abdomen and pelvis (Figure 1A, 1B). On a color Doppler study, few of these lesions showed significant internal vascularity with a low-resistance arterial waveform (Figure 2). The patient was then evaluated by plain and contrast-enhanced computed tomography which revealed multiple lobulated, iso- to hypodense lesions in the peritoneum, bilateral adnexa, recto-uterine pouch, pre-vesical space and left rectus abdominis muscle (Figure 3). Most of these lesions showed moderate to intense enhancement on postcontrast images (Figure 4). Few of these enhancing lesions showed nonenhancing areas within, suggestive of necrosis. The patient was subsequently evaluated with MRI. The same lesions appeared isointense to skeletal muscles on T1W images (Figure 5), isointense to moderately hyperintense on T2W images (Figure 6) and moderately hyperintense on short tau inversion recovery (STIR) images (Figure 7). Central areas of blooming were seen in few of these lesions on gradient echo (GRE) images, suggestive of hemorrhage (Figure 8). No restricted diffusion was noted in these lesions on diffusion weighted images (DWI). On postcontrast T1W images, intense enhancement of these lesions was seen with few non-enhancing areas within due to necrosis (Figure 9). The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy with bilateral oophorectomy and most of the lesions were resected from the peritoneum and pelvis. On gross appearance, the lesions appeared pale, lobulated and firm in consistency (Figure 10). On histopathological examination, the specimens consisted of spindle-shaped smooth muscle cells with intervening extracellular matrix and fibroblasts, consistent with leiomyoma (Figures 11, 12). Two of the specimens showed cellular atypia, pleomorphism and increased mitotic activity suggestive of a malignant transformation (Figure 13).
Discussion
Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata is a rare disease of smooth muscle cells and is characterized by formation of multiple nodular masses in the abdominopelvic peritoneum, in the submesothelial tissue. Although the disease was first described as early as in 1952, the term was first coined and explained in detail by Taubert in 1965 [1]. The pathogenesis of this condition has been attributed to exposure to increased levels of either endogenous or exogenous estrogens. An association has been noted with oral contraceptive pills and estrogen secreting tumors [2]. A lower sensitivity threshold of the smooth muscle cells to estrogens and subsequent metaplasia have also been suspected as a causative factor [3]. Most of the cases are usually asymptomatic and are associated with uterine leiomyomas. Laparoscopic myomectomy has also been hypothesized to cause LPD by a spread of smooth muscle cells along the laparoscopic tract [4]. Malignant transformation of LPD is an extremely rare complication of the disease with only three cases reported in the literature so far [5]. On ultrasound, the lesions are seen as multiple, lobulated, hypoechoic masses of variable sizes, scattered in the abdominopelvic peritoneum and omentum. Malignant lesions show internal vascularity with low resistance, as seen in the above-mentioned patient. Areas of hemorrhage and necrosis can also be noted in malignant lesions. Computed tomography shows these lesions as lobulated isoto hypodense lesions with homogenous to heterogeneous enhancement. Areas of necrosis and hemorrhage point towards a suspicion of malignancy. MRI is the imaging modality of choice for LPD due to its excellent soft tissue characterization. Typically, the lesions appear isointense to skeletal and smooth muscles on T1W and T2W images, with intense enhancement on postcontrast T1W images. Areas of increased signal intensity on T2W and STIR images with blooming on GRE images suggest necrosis and hemorrhage, respectively, which also points towards a malignant transformation. Diffusion weighted images also provide useful information, as malignant leiomyomas could show restricted diffusion with decreased apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values compared to their benign counterparts [6]. However, in our case, none of the lesions showed restricted diffusion on DWI. Definitive diagnosis of LPD with a malignant transformation is made by a histopathological examination of a tissue sample, which usually reveals spindle-shaped cells, fibroblasts with cellular atypia and nuclear pleomorphism, intranuclear vacuoles and increased mitoses. On immunohistochemistry, the cells are positive for a-smooth muscle actin and vimentin [7].
The main differential diagnosis of LPD is peritoneal carcinomatosis due to unknown primary, if patients present with anorexia and cachexia [8]. Ascites, multiple bony and hepatic metastases point towards a diagnosis of carcinomatosis. Benign metastasizing leiomyoma is another major differential diagnosis in which multiple differentiated leiomyomas are seen in organs distant from the uterus. However, lesions are most commonly seen in the lungs. Concurrent presence of LPD and leiomyosarcoma can also be considered as a remote possibility [9].
Conclusions
Based on imaging findings and a pathologic correlation, a final diagnosis of leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata with a malignant transformation was made.
Acknowledgement
We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to Dr. Sayali Deshmukh from Department of Pathology, B.J.Government Medical College, Poona and Dr. Hadiya Naureen from Department of Pathology, Bapuji Hospital for their selfless help in this article.
References
- 1.Taubert HD, Wissner SE, Haskins AL. Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata. Obstet Gynecol. 1965;25:561–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Drake A, Dhundee J, Buckley CH, Woolas R. Disseminated leiomyomatosis peritonealis in association with oestrogen secreting ovarian fibrothecoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;108:661–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00132.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Travassoli FA, Norris HJ. Peritoneal leiomyomatosis (leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata): A clinicopathologic study of 20 cases with ultrastructural observations. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1982;1:59–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kumar S, Sharma JB, Verma D, et al. Disseminated peritoneal leiomyomatosis: an unusual complication of laparoscopic myomectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(1):93–95. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0536-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bekkers RL, Willemsen WN, Schijf CP, et al. Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata: Does malignant transformation occur? A literature review. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;75(1):158–63. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sato K, Yuasa N, Fujita M, Fukushima Y. Clinical application of diffusion-weighted imaging for preoperative differentiation between uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(4):368.e1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yamaguchi T, Imamura Y, Yamamoto T, Fukuda M. Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata with malignant change in a man. Pathol Int. 2003;53:179–85. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2003.01452.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fasih N, Prasad Shanbhogue AK, Macdonald DB, et al. Leiomyomas beyond the uterus: Unusual locations, rare manifestations. Radiographics. 2008;28:1931–48. doi: 10.1148/rg.287085095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tun AM, Tun NM, Zin Thein K. A rare concurresnce of leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata, leiomyosarcoma of the pelvis and leiomyomatous nodule of the liver. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2016;2016:3025432. doi: 10.1155/2016/3025432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]