Skip to main content
The Journal of Neuroscience logoLink to The Journal of Neuroscience
. 2018 Apr 4;38(14):3414–3427. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2440-17.2018

Heteromeric KV2/KV8.2 Channels Mediate Delayed Rectifier Potassium Currents in Primate Photoreceptors

Jacqueline Gayet-Primo 1, Daniel B Yaeger 3, Roupen A Khanjian 3, Teresa Puthussery 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC5895036  PMID: 29483285

Abstract

Silent voltage-gated potassium channel subunits (KVS) interact selectively with members of the KV2 channel family to modify their functional properties. The localization and functional roles of these silent subunits remain poorly understood. Mutations in the KVS subunit, KV8.2 (KCNV2), lead to severe visual impairment in humans, but the basis of these deficits remains unclear. Here, we examined the localization, native interactions, and functional properties of KV8.2-containing channels in mouse, macaque, and human photoreceptors of either sex. In human retina, KV8.2 colocalized with KV2.1 and KV2.2 in cone inner segments and with KV2.1 in rod inner segments. KV2.1 and KV2.2 could be coimmunoprecipitated with KV8.2 in retinal lysates indicating that these subunits likely interact directly. Retinal KV2.1 was less phosphorylated than cortical KV2.1, a difference expected to alter the biophysical properties of these channels. Using voltage-clamp recordings and pharmacology, we provide functional evidence for Kv2-containing channels in primate rods and cones. We propose that the presence of KV8.2, and low levels of KV2.1 phosphorylation shift the activation range of KV2 channels to align with the operating range of rod and cone photoreceptors. Our data indicate a role for KV2/KV8.2 channels in human photoreceptor function and suggest that the visual deficits in patients with KCNV2 mutations arise from inadequate resting activation of KV channels in rod and cone inner segments.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Mutations in a voltage-gated potassium channel subunit, KV8.2, underlie a blinding inherited photoreceptor dystrophy, indicating an important role for these channels in human vision. Here, we have defined the localization and subunit interactions of KV8.2 channels in primate photoreceptors. We show that the KV8.2 subunit interacts with different Kv2 channels in rods and cones, giving rise to potassium currents with distinct functional properties. Our results provide a molecular basis for retinal dysfunction in patients with mutations in the KCNV2 gene encoding KV8.2.

Keywords: cones, ion channels, potassium channels, retina, rods

Introduction

Voltage-gated potassium channels (KV) are a large and diverse family of ion channels expressed in neuronal and non-neuronal tissues. The KV2 family (Shab) subunits, KV2.1 and KV2.2, are high-voltage–activated and are widely expressed in central neurons where they generate delayed rectifier KV currents that regulate the rate and repolarization of action potentials (Liu and Bean, 2014; Kimm et al., 2015). The KV2 subunits can only form functional heterotetramers within the KV2 family, or with the so-called “modifier/silent” subunits, KV5, KV6, KV8, and KV9 (KVS). KVS subunits cannot form functional homomeric channels but interact with KV2 channels to alter their biophysical properties (for review, see Bocksteins and Snyders, 2012; Bocksteins, 2016). The KVS subunits are presumed to produce tissue-specific or cell-type-specific modification of KV2 channel gating properties; however, the localization, subunit interactions, and functional significance of KVS subunits remain poorly understood.

KV8.2 is the only silent subunit that has thus far been implicated in human disease. Variants/mutations in the gene that encodes this protein, KCNV2, have been implicated in epilepsy susceptibility (Jorge et al., 2011), as well as in an inherited photoreceptor dystrophy known as “cone-dystrophy with supernormal rod response” (Wu et al., 2006; Wissinger et al., 2008, 2011; Zelinger et al., 2013). The photoreceptor dystrophy causes reduced visual acuity, photophobia, color vision deficits, and variable loss of night vision (Gouras et al., 1983). Because KV8.2 subunits cannot form functional homomeric channels, visual dysfunction presumably arises from alterations in KV2/KV8.2 heteromeric channels. Indeed, in expression systems, KV2.1/KV8.2 heteromers exhibit more hyperpolarized activation potentials, show less inactivation, and have lower current densities than homomeric KV2.1 channels (Czirják et al., 2007; Smith et al., 2012). Although KV2.1 and KV8.2 genes are expressed in human and rodent outer retina (Wu et al., 2006; Czirják et al., 2007), the localization of the proteins remains unclear (Pinto and Klumpp, 1998; Aslanidis et al., 2014). Moreover, to our knowledge, interactions between KV2 and KV8.2 subunits have not yet been demonstrated in any native tissue.

Delayed rectifier KV currents are continuously active in photoreceptors. In darkness, photoreceptors are tonically depolarized by a “dark current” mediated by cGMP-gated cation channels in the outer segment. This inward dark current is balanced by a noninactivating delayed rectifier KV current in the inner segment, dubbed IKx (Beech and Barnes, 1989; Yan and Matthews, 1992), which stabilizes the resting potential at ∼−40 mV (Schneeweis and Schnapf, 1995). Upon light stimulation, the photoreceptors hyperpolarize and the KV current shuts off with some delay, leading to a delayed depolarizing phase that renders the photoreceptor voltage response more transient and bandpass filtered. The molecular identity of the channels that mediate the delayed rectifier KV current has not been resolved. Here, we demonstrate the differential expression of KV2.1, KV2.2, and KV8.2 in rod and cone photoreceptors in human and mouse retina, show protein-binding interactions between these K channel subunits in the retina, and provide physiological and pharmacological evidence that there are functional Kv2-containing channels in nonhuman primate photoreceptors. Our results provide insights into the molecular basis for visual deficits in patients with KCNV2 mutations.

Materials and Methods

Tissue preparation.

Human retinal samples were obtained from eyes that were enucleated for management of lid or orbital tumors, but there was no significant coexisting retinal pathology. Samples were deidentified before receipt by the investigators of this study, and thus the Oregon Health & Science University Institutional Review Board deemed use of these tissues “nonhuman subject research.” Nonhuman primate eyes were obtained from adult rhesus or cynomolgus macaques of either sex. Eyes were recovered from animals killed in the course of unrelated experiments, through the Tissue Distribution Program at the Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University. The anterior eye, lens, and vitreous were removed, and the retina, with attached pigment epithelium and choroid, was removed from the sclera. Tissue was maintained in Ames' medium equilibrated with 95% O2/5% CO2 at ∼25°C. For immunohistochemistry, retinae were fixed with pigment attached for 5–30 min in 4% PFA in 0.1 m PB. Adult (>4 weeks) C57BL/6J wild-type mice of either sex were killed by an intraperitoneal overdose of sodium pentobarbital or by cervical dislocation. All mouse procedures were approved by the Oregon Health & Science University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. For immunoprecipitation and immunoblots, macaque retinae were isolated in Ames' medium, snap frozen on liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until further use.

Immunohistochemistry.

Details of the primary antibodies used in this study are given in Table 1. Indirect immunofluorescence immunohistochemistry was performed essentially as described previously (Puthussery et al., 2011, 2013). Briefly, pieces of retina with attached RPE/choroid (human and macaque) or posterior eyecups (mouse) were cryoprotected in graded sucrose solutions (10–30%), embedded in Cryogel mounting medium, and sectioned at 14 μm. For mouse retinal sections, slices traversed the dorsal to ventral retina to rule out any staining variations that might arise due to differences in cone distribution. Mouse eyes were oriented using previously described protocols (Wei et al., 2010). In some experiments with KV8.2 antibodies (ms and rb), sections were treated for antigen retrieval with 0.15 mg/ml pepsin in 0.2 m HCl at 25°C. The reaction was stopped with washes in ice-cold 0.1 m PB before proceeding to the blocking step. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked in 10% normal horse serum, 1% Triton X-100, 0.025% NaN3 in PBS for 1 h at 25°C. Primary antibodies were diluted in 3% normal horse serum, 1% Triton X-100, 0.025% NaN3 in PBS and applied to sections overnight at 25°C. After washing, sections were incubated in secondary antibodies diluted in 3% normal horse serum, 0.025% NaN3 in PBS for 1 h at 25°C. Secondary antibodies were raised in donkey or goat and conjugated to AlexaFluor-488, -594, or -647 (Invitrogen) or Cy3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Isotype selective anti-mouse secondary antibodies were used when mouse monoclonal antibodies of different IgG subclasses were combined in double labeling experiments. In some experiments, we used AlexaFluor-488-conjugated peanut agglutinin (PNA) lectin to localize mouse cones (Invitrogen, L21409). Slides were mounted in Mowiol mounting medium.

Table 1.

Primary antibody informationa

Antibody Host/isotype Immunogen Supplier/catalog #/lot #/RRID # Validation Dilution and application
Calbindin Rabbit Recombinant rat calbindin D-28k Swant, Switzerland, catalog #CB38, RRID:AB_10000340 Immunostaining in cerebellum of calbindin D-28k KO mouse (see datasheet) IHC: 1:8000
Glutamine synthetase Mouse IgG2a Human glutamine synthetase a.a. 1–373 BD Biosciences, catalog #610517, RRID: AB_397879 Recognizes a 45 kDa band on WBs of rat cerebrum lysates (see datasheet); expected pattern of staining in Müller glia IHC: 1:10,000
KV2.1 (K89/34) Mouse IgG1 a.a. 837–853 of rat KV2.1 NeuroMab,b catalog #75-014, RRID: AB_10673392, lot #449-3AK-78 WB in KV2.1 KO mouse (see datasheet) IHC: 1:800
WB: 1:800
IP: 11.25 μg/ml protein
KV2.1 (L80/21) Mouse IgG3 a.a. 837–853 of rat KV2.1 NeuroMab, catalog #73-315 RRID: AB_2315862, lot #437-6VA-52 WB in KV2.1 KO mouse (see datasheet) WB: 1:10
KV2.2 Rabbit a.a. 859–873 of rat KV2.2 Alomone Labs, catalog #APC120, RRID: AB_2040164, lot #AN-01 WB with anti-KV2.2 antibody preincubated with the control peptide antigen (see datasheet); tested by immunohistochemistry in KO mouse (Tong et al., 2013) IHC: 1:4000
IP: 11.25 μg/ml protein
KV2.2 (N372B/1) Mouse IgG1 a.a. 717–907 of rat KV2.2 long isoform NeuroMab, catalog #73-369, RRID: AB_2315869, lot #437-8VA-10 Immunostaining in KV2.2 KO mouse (see datasheet) IHC: 1:8–1:10
WB: 1:8–1:10
KV2.2 (N373B/60) Mouse IgG2b a.a. 717–907 of rat KV2.2 long isoform NeuroMab, catalog #73-360, RRID: AB_2315867, lot #437-7VA-76 WB and immunostaining in KV2.2 KO mouse (see datasheet) IHC: 1:10
KV2.2 (N372C/51) Mouse IgG1 a.a. 717–907 of rat KV2.2 long isoform NeuroMab, catalog #73-358, RRID: AB_2315865, lot #437-7VA-73 WB and immunostaining in KV2.2 KO mouse (see datasheet) IHC: 1:10
KV2.2 (K37/89) Mouse IgG2a a.a. 1–61 of human KV2.2 NeuroMab, catalog #73-015, RRID: AB_10673393, lot #413-5RR-08; catalog #75-015, lot #443-1KS-100 WB in KV2.2 KO mouse (see datasheet) IHC: 1:50
KV8.2 Mouse IgG2b a.a. 1–163 of mouse KV8.2 NeuroMab, catalog #73-435, RRID: AB_2532091, lot #463-1DH-95 Immunostaining in transfected cells expressing target and brain immunoblots (see datasheet) IHC: mouse 1:2
KV8.2 Rabbit a.a. 16–75 of human KV8.2 Sigma-Aldrich, catalog #HPA031131, RRID: AB_10609996, lot #R31013 Validated by protein array, single peak corresponding to KV8.2 antigen, immunostaining of human pancreas (see datasheet) IHC: macaque and human 1:100
IP: 11.25 μg/ml protein
S-opsin Goat Peptide mapping at the N-terminus of the opsin protein encoded by OPN1SW of human origin Santa Cruz Biotechnology, catalog #sc-14363, RRID: AB_2158332 Pattern of staining consistent with expected ratio of S-cones; no cross-reactivity with cones expressing L/M opsin IHC: 1:500
L/M opsin Rabbit Recombinant human red/green opsin Millipore, catalog #AB5405, RRID: AB_11212667, lot #2618475 Pattern of staining consistent with expected ratio of L/M-cones; no cross-reactivity with cones expressing S opsin IHC: 1:500

aa.a., Amino acids; IHC, immunohistochemistry; WB, Western blot; IP, immunoprecipitation.

bNeuroMab catalog numbers commencing 73- are tissue culture supernatants.

Confocal images were acquired on an Olympus FV1000 laser scanning microscope (60×/1.4 objective, 488, 559, and 643 nm laser lines) or on a Zeiss LSM 880 laser scanning microscope (63×/1.4 objective, 488, 561, and 594 nm laser lines). Images were acquired sequentially to prevent fluorescent cross talk. In some cases, adjustments to image brightness and contrast were made with ImageJ (Fiji) 1.48r or Adobe Photoshop CC.

For quantification of KV2 staining intensity in human cones, we acquired confocal z stacks of vertical sections of retina labeled for KV2.2 and S cone-opsin. Optimal PMT gain and laser power settings were determined while viewing a high-low lookup table to prevent pixel saturation. Acquisition settings were then kept constant for imaging different regions from the same sample. Confocal image stacks were analyzed using Fiji. For each cone, we found the central plane of the inner segment and then made 10 straight line profile plots (10 pixel width) perpendicular to the membrane. The peaks of the intensity plots were then aligned and averaged together in Igor Pro 6.0 (Wavemetrics) to find the average membrane intensity for each cone inner segment. Data were analyzed using paired t tests with an α value of 0.05.

Immunoblots and immunoprecipitation.

For immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting experiments of macaque retina, tissues were either snap frozen at −80°C or solubilized in a lysis buffer containing 50 mm Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mm NaCl, 5 mm EDTA 1% Triton X-100, and 1× protease and phosphatase inhibitor mixture (Thermo Scientific, catalog #78440) for 1 h with periodic mixing and frozen at −80°C until further use. Protein concentration was determined using the BCA Protein Assay (Thermo Scientific). For immunoprecipitation, retinal lysates were precleared on Pierce Control Resin for 60 min at 4°C, then processed using the indirect method. Capture antibodies were added to lysates at a concentration of 2–11.25 μg/ml, and samples were incubated for 2 h at 4°C with mixing. Protein A/G-coated agarose beads (Pierce) were then added to the lysates and left overnight at 4°C with mixing. Beads were collected by centrifugation, washed 6–8 times in lysis buffer, and bound proteins were eluted by adding Novex Tris-glycine SDS sample buffer with 2.5% β-mercaptoethanol or 100 mm DTT. Eluates were heated to 85°C for 5 min, separated by SDS-PAGE on Novex 4%–20% Tris-glycine gels, then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. To ensure reproducibility, coimmunoprecipitation assays were replicated in 2–5 independent experiments with tissues from different animals.

For immunoblotting, membranes were blocked for 1 h in Odyssey Blocking Buffer (Li-Cor Biosciences). Primary antibodies (anti-KV2.1 clone K89/34, anti-KV2.2 clone N372B/1, rabbit anti-KV8.2) were diluted in the same buffer and applied for 2 h at 25°C or overnight at 4°C. The membrane was washed extensively in PBS-Tween-20 before incubating for 30 min at 25°C with the appropriate infrared dye-conjugated secondary antibodies (goat anti-mouse IgG IRDye 800CW, 1:7500, Li-Cor Biosciences or goat anti-rabbit Alexa-680, 1:7500, Invitrogen) diluted in Odyssey Blocking Buffer. Infrared secondary antibodies were visualized with an Odyssey Scanner (LI-COR), and digital images were uniformly adjusted for brightness and contrast using Image Studio Lite software (LI-COR Biosciences).

To study the phosphorylation state of KV2.1 protein, mice were killed by cervical dislocation, and the retinae and brains were removed within a 1 min postmortem period. Retinae and neocortices were dissected and homogenized in ice-cold homogenization buffer containing the following: 50 mm Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mm NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1× protease, and 1–2× phosphatase inhibitor mixture (Thermo Scientific, product #1861280). Homogenates were then incubated with 1 unit of calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (AP, Roche/Sigma-Aldrich#11 097 075 001, 20 U/ml) per μg of protein for 2 h at 37°C or without calf intestinal AP for 2 h at 4°C or 37°C. To measure the relative electrophoretic shift with AP treatment, we subtracted the molecular weight of the KV2.1 band after AP treatment (37°C) from the weight of the KV2.1 band without AP treatment (4°C). Samples were diluted in a reducing sample buffer (15 μg of crude retina protein or 30 μg of cortical protein/lane), separated by SDS-PAGE on Novex 6% Tris-glycine gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes.

Electrophysiology.

All tissue dissections and recordings were made under light-adapted conditions. After removal of the sclera, the macaque retina with attached pigment epithelium and choroid was maintained in Ames' medium equilibrated with 95% O2/5% CO2 until use. Whole-cell recordings of rod and cone photoreceptors were made either in retinal slices or intact retinal whole mounts. For whole-mount recordings, the choroid was slowly peeled away and the retina was placed photoreceptor side-up in the recording chamber. For slices, isolated retina was mounted ganglion cell side down on nitrocellulose membrane and cut at 300–350 μm with a manual tissue chopper (MyNeuroLab, Leica Microsystems). Slices were mounted vertically on a coverslip between two tracks of vacuum grease. For cone recordings, cells were targeted for patch-clamp recordings at the level of the inner segment, whereas rods were recorded from the soma or inner segment. All recordings were made from retinal pieces >6 mm from the foveal center.

Slices were transferred to the recording chamber and continuously superfused with carbogenated Ames' at a rate of 3 ml/min. A temperature controller (Cell Microcontrols) was used to maintain the chamber at 33°C–34°C. Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were obtained with an HEKA EPC10 patch-clamp amplifier on an Olympus BX51WI microscope fitted with infrared Dodt contrast (850 nm). The following extracellular recordings solutions were used in these studies: (1) Ames' medium (US Biologicals); (2) Co-Cs Ames' medium (in mm as follows): 116 NaCl, 23 NaHCO3, 3.1 KCl, 1.15 CoCl2, 1.2 MgCl2, 4 CsCl, 6 glucose, 0.5 l-glutamine, and in some experiments (see Fig. 5, 3 cones) 2 mm 4-AP; and (3) Co-Cs Ames' medium + 5 mm BaCl2. For all experiments, retinae were maintained in normal Ames' medium between recordings. Shortly before or upon obtaining the whole-cell recording, the perfusion line was switched to Co-Cs Ames' and the bath was equilibrated for 3 min before commencing recordings of isolated KV currents. All control data shown here are from tissues bathed in Co-Cs Ames'. Patch-clamp electrodes (8–10 mΩ) were filled with an intracellular solution containing the following (in mm): 118 K-methanesulfonate, 10 KCl, 2 Mg-ATP, 1 Na-GTP, 1 EGTA, 10 Na-HEPES, 10 Na2-phosphocreatine adjusted to pH 7.35 with KOH. Slices were maintained in normal Ames' medium at room temperature (∼25°C) between recordings. Voltages have been corrected by subtracting a 10 mV liquid-junction potential. Series resistance was compensated online by 30%–70%. All experiments were performed at 33°C–34°C. Guangxitoxin-1E (GxTX-1E) and citalopram were obtained from Alomone Labs and were stored in aliquots at −20°C until use. Stock solutions of GxTX-1E were made up in PBS and stabilized with 0.1% BSA as carrier. Drug-containing solutions were superfused for at least 3–4 min before postapplication recordings were made. For focal application of GxTX-1E, the peptide toxin was added to Co-Cs Ames' solution to a final concentration of 1 μm and pressure applied (Picospritzer, ∼3 psi) via a patch pipette (8–10 mΩ) positioned near the photoreceptor inner segment.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

KV2 channels are concentrated in photoreceptor inner segments, distal to the outer limiting membrane. A, B, Confocal sections showing localization of Kv2.1 and glutamine synthetase (GS) in mouse (A) and human (B) outer retina. In both species, Kv2.1 is concentrated in the inner segment, distal to the glutamine synthetase-immunolabeled outer limiting membrane. Scale bar, 10 μm.

Data were analyzed using custom software in Igor Pro 6 and 7 (Wavemetrics). Tail currents were measured at a fixed time point near the peak current (0.555 s) and were recorded at least 2–3 min after whole-cell dialysis. Activation curves were fitted with a simple Boltzmann equation (f(V) = Gmax/(1 + exp((V1/2 − V)/k))) where V is the membrane potential, Gmax is the maximal conductance, V1/2 is the potential at which half the channels are activated, and k is the voltage-change that produces an e-fold change in channel activity. Current was converted to chord conductance based on a calculated potassium equilibrium potential of −98 mV. Percentage inactivation of the high-voltage–activated KV current (see Fig. 7) was calculated from the ratio of the current measured at 480 and 20 ms after the onset of the voltage step. For experiments where GxTX-1E and citalopram were bath-applied, net voltage-gated currents at each potential were obtained by subtracting linear currents estimated as scaled responses to 10 mV depolarizations delivered from the holding potential. GxTX-1E or citalopram-sensitive currents were calculated by subtracting net voltage-gated currents obtained after drug application from currents obtained before drug application. For experiments where GxTX-1E was focally applied (see Fig. 9C), the magnitude of the voltage-gated currents was measured by subtracting the instantaneous current component from the peak current amplitude.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Rod and cone photoreceptors have distinct voltage-activated KV currents. A–D, Average voltage-activated currents in macaque cone (A) and rod (B) photoreceptors in response to the voltage step protocol shown above the traces. Voltage steps were 0.5 s long. Black and blue traces represent hyperpolarizing and depolarizing voltage steps, respectively. Dashed line indicates the zero current level. Gray dotted bounding boxes represent the tail currents, which are shown on an expanded scale in C and D. The tail currents evoked from steps to −90 and −100 mV show an outward current that may be due to relief of inactivation of an A-type KV current. Current traces are averages of 15 cones and 12 rods. E, Cone (solid circles, n = 19) and rod (open circles, n = 12) conductance (mean ± SEM) calculated from tail currents and shown as a function of voltage. Solid and dashed lines indicate fits to a simple Boltzmann function.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

GxTX-1E blocks a high-voltage–activated KV current in rods and cones. A, Voltage-activated currents in a macaque cone recorded before (A, black traces, CoCs Ames') and after wash-in of 100 nm GxTX-1E (A, red traces). Cells were held at −70 mV and stepped to 40 mV in 10 mV increments. B, Conductance shown as a function of voltage for the cell shown in A. A, Arrows indicate the time point at which conductance measurements were taken. Gray symbols represent the GxTX-1E-sensitive current (CoCs–GxTx-1E). Gray line indicates the Boltzmann fit to an individual cell showing a V1/2 of 0.6 mV, k = 8 mV, maximum conductance of 1.76 nS. C, Voltage-activated KV current shown before (Ctrl) and after focal application of GxTX-1E in a cone and rod. Note the suppression of the gated outward current in the presence of GxTx-1E.

Experimental design and statistics.

For immunohistochemistry experiments, we imaged 38 slides from 10 macaques (8 females, 2 males, age range 6–22 years, mean age 11.5 years, median age 11.5 years) and one whole-mount retina. Seventeen sections were immunolabeled with KV2.1, 11 sections with KV2.2, and 15 sections with KV8.2. For human retina, we imaged a total of 32 slides from 4 individuals (1 female age 41 years, 3 males, ages 61, 71, 72 years) and one retinal whole mount. A total of 25 sections were labeled for KV2.1, 10 sections for KV2.2, and 15 sections for KV8.2. For mouse retina, we imaged 19 slides from 8 animals (either gender, age range 7 weeks to 11 months) and one whole-mount retina. Five sections were labeled for KV2.1, 9 sections for KV2.2, and 9 sections for KV8.2.

We used paired t tests for comparisons where indicated. For nonpaired data, we tested for equal variances using an F test and then applied either an unpaired, two-tailed t test (equal variance) or a Welch's t test (unequal variance). Statistical comparisons were made using the Data Analysis add-on of Microsoft Excel. An α level of 0.05 was used for all comparisons.

Results

Localization of KV2 and KV8.2 subunits in mouse and primate photoreceptors

Our first objective was to determine the localization of KV8.2 and its interacting subunits. Using immunohistochemistry, we found that KV8.2, KV2.1, and KV2.2 were highly expressed in human photoreceptor inner segments (ellipsoid and myoid regions; Fig. 1A–C) but were absent or scant in the outer segment, nuclear region, and synaptic terminals. Two isoforms of KV2.2 have been previously described in the rat brain, KV2.2short and KV2.2long; the long isoform can form functional heteromers with KV2.1, whereas the short isoform cannot (Kihira et al., 2010). Staining with two antibodies specific for KV2.2long (clone N372B/1 and rabbit polyclonal antibody) confirmed expression of KV2.2long in photoreceptors. A comparable pattern of staining was seen with an antibody that reacts with both the short and long isoforms of KV2.2 (clone K37/89), suggesting that KV2.2long is the major retinal isoform (KV2.2long-specific antibody shown in Fig. 1B). The KV2.1 and KV2.2 antibodies also labeled some bipolar, amacrine, and ganglion cells, which we have not examined further here.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Localization of KV2.1, KV2.2, and KV8.2 in human, macaque, and mouse retina. Confocal z projections showing immunolocalization of KV2.1, KV2.2long, and KV8.2 in human (A–C), macaque (D–F), and mouse (G–I) retina. In human and macaque retina, strong expression of all channel subunits is evident at the level of the photoreceptor inner segments (IS), but the photoreceptor nuclei and terminals show absent or scant labeling. A, B, Intentionally saturated to show the presence of Kv subunits in the inner retina. ONL, Outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; GCL, ganglion cell layer. B, Arrow indicates clustered membrane labeling in a ganglion cell. Scale bar, 20 μm.

To determine to what extent KV subunit localization is conserved in photoreceptors of other mammals, we examined Kv subunit localization in macaque (Fig. 1D–F) and mouse retina (Fig. 1G–I). The overall pattern of localization for KV2.1 and KV2.2 was comparable between macaque and human retina. KV8.2 immunolabeling was more robust in human photoreceptors than in macaque retina, a difference that may be attributable to the fact that that the antigen used to generate the rabbit-anti-KV8.2 antibody showed lower homology with the macaque KV8.2 sequence (predicted homology ∼91%) than with the human KV8.2 sequence (100%). As in primate retina, KV2.1 and KV8.2 were expressed in mouse photoreceptors, but KV2.2 was not detectable. To verify this apparent species difference between mouse and primate, we tested five different antibodies raised against three unique epitopes of KV2.2, all of which have been validated for specificity in knock-out mice (see Table 1). In mouse and rat retina, all of the KV2.2 antibodies labeled inner retinal neurons, but not photoreceptors (KV2.2L clone N372B/1 AB shown in Fig. 1; other data not shown). Interestingly, KV2.2 was expressed in rabbit photoreceptors (data not shown), similar to in primate retina. Together, these data indicate that KV2.1 and KV8.2 channel expression is highly conserved between mouse, macaque, and human photoreceptors, whereas KV2.2 subunits appear to be expressed in primate and rabbit, but not rodent, cones.

KV8.2 is colocalized with KV2 channels in human photoreceptor inner segments

Photoreceptor morphology differs between central and peripheral human retina, and KV8.2 mutations disproportionately affect the foveal region; therefore, we compared channel localization between central and peripheral human retina. We first examined the foveal slope region (0–0.22 μm eccentricity; Fig. 2A), where rod photoreceptors are absent. At this eccentricity, KV2.1, KV2.2long (referred to herein as KV2.2), and KV8.2 immunoreactivity was concentrated in the membranes of cone inner segments (Fig. 2B–D) and cytosolic staining for KV8.2 was also present in this region (Fig. 2D). We then examined KV channel expression in peripheral retina where both rod and cone photoreceptors are present. Cones were distinguished from rods by their larger size and immunoreactivity for calbindin, which is present in human L/M cones (Chiquet et al., 2002). KV2.1 immunoreactivity was apparent in both rod and cone inner segments, whereas KV2.2long was found only in cone inner segments (Fig. 2E–J). Like KV2.1, the KV8.2 subunit was present in both rod and cone inner segments, and these proteins were colocalized in the photoreceptor inner segment membranes (Fig. 2K–M). Double labeling for KV2.1 and KV2.2 showed that these subunits were colocalized in cone inner segment membranes (Fig. 2N–P). It is important to note that KV2 subunit staining was diffusely distributed throughout the photoreceptor inner segment membrane; this is in stark contrast to most other central neurons where KV2.1 and KV2.2 subunits form giant (∼1 μm) membrane clusters (see, e.g., Kihira et al., 2010; Bishop et al., 2015). Indeed, we found that both the KV2.1 (data not shown) and KV2.2 subunits (Fig. 1B) localized to giant clusters in ganglion cell membranes, indicating that the diffuse expression in photoreceptors cannot be accounted for by differences in sample preparation. Together, these results indicate that KV2 channel inventory differs between human rods and cones; cone inner segments express KV2.1, KV2.2long, and KV8.2 subunits, whereas rod inner segments contain only KV2.1 and KV8.2 subunits.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Differential expression of KV2 channel subunits in human rods and cones. A, Low-power confocal micrograph showing a transmitted light view of the human foveal slope overlaid on immunostaining for KV2.1 (green). B–D, Localization of KV2.1, KV2.2, and KV8.2 in foveal cone inner segment membranes within the central rod-free zone. KV2.1 and KV2.2 staining is confined to cone inner segment membranes, whereas KV8.2 immunoreactivity is also present in the intracellular compartment of the inner segments. E–J, Double labeling for KV2.1 or KV2.2 with the cone photoreceptor marker, calbindin (CalB). KV2.1 is present in rod and cone inner segment membranes (E–G), whereas KV2.2 is restricted to cone inner segments (H–J). K–M, Double labeling for the KV8.2 and KV2.1 channel subunits. KV8.2 is present in both rod and cone inner segment membranes where it is colocalized with KV2.1. While KV2.1 is largely confined to the plasma membrane, KV8.2 also shows some weak immunoreactivity in the intracellular compartment. N–P, Double labeling for KV2.1 and KV2.2 channel subunits. Note the colocalization of subunits in cone inner segments. All confocal images are single optical sections. Scale bars: A, 20 μm; (in P) B–P, 10 μm. OS, Outer segment. HFL, Henle's fiber layer.

After viewing a large number of sections, we observed that the intensity of KV2.2 staining was systematically lower in a small subset of cones, and we hypothesized that these might represent short-wavelength-sensitive S cones (“blue” cones). To test this hypothesis, we immunolabeled retinal sections with KV2.2, S cone opsin, and calbindin, a calcium-binding protein expressed in long (L) and medium (M) wavelength cones, but not S cones, in human retina (Chiquet et al., 2002) (Fig. 3A,B). Because L and M cones cannot be distinguished immunohistochemically, we grouped them together as L/M cones for analysis. Measurements in preparations from 4 different human retinas revealed that the intensity of KV2.2 fluorescence was 52 ± 12% lower (mean ± SD) in the inner segments of S cones compared with L/M cones (t(3) = 8.9751, p = 0.0029, one-sample t test, 114 L/M and 111 S cones; Fig. 3A,B,F). Qualitatively similar results were observed in whole mounts of macaque monkey retina that were stained for KV2.2, L/M-opsin, and S-opsin. In macaque, the intensity of KV2.2 staining was lower in a subset of smaller cone inner segment profiles (Fig. 3C). When the focal plane was shifted to the level of the outer segments, we found that these profiles were contiguous with cones expressing S-opsin (Fig. 3D,E). Together, these results indicate that S cones express lower levels of KV2.2 compared with L/M cones in human and macaque retina.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Primate S cones express lower levels of KV2.2 than L/M cones. A, Confocal projection of a vertical section of mid-peripheral human retina labeled for S-opsin, calbindin (CalB), and KV2.2L. B, Same section as in A showing region containing photoreceptor inner segments (green channel only). The 3 L/M cones (white arrows) and the one S cone (blue arrow) are projections through complete inner segments. C–E, Confocal images of a macaque retinal whole-mount labeled for Kv2.2, S-opsin, and L/M-opsin. C, Focus is at the inner segments. D, Same x-y-z position in green projected onto z planes from the photoreceptor outer segments to enable identification of cone spectral type. E, Side projection of a different region of the same retina. The smaller and less intense KV2.2 staining is associated with the S cone inner segments. F, Relative fluorescence intensity of KV2.2 immunostaining in L/M cones (LWS) versus S cones (SWS) in human retina. Lines connect measurements taken in the same retinas. **p = 0.0029. Scale bar, 20 μm.

KV8.2 and KV2.1 are expressed in mouse rod and cone inner segments

To determine whether KV8.2 and KV2.1 were expressed in mouse cones as well as rods, we used PNA-lectin to distinguish between rod and cone inner segment membranes (Fig. 4). We found that KV8.2 (Fig. 4A,B) and KV2.1 (Fig. 4C,D) were present in the inner segment membranes of rods as well as PNA-labeled cones. KV2.1 and KV8.2 subunits were colocalized in mouse photoreceptor membranes (Fig. 4E–G). These results indicate that, as in human retina, KV8.2 and KV2.1 colocalize in mouse rod and cone photoreceptors.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

KV2.1 and KV8.2 are expressed in mouse rod and cone photoreceptors. Confocal optical sections of mouse outer retina labeled for KV subunits (green) and the cone photoreceptor marker, PNA (magenta). A, B, Double label for KV8.2 and PNA shows KV8.2 in PNA-positive cone inner segments (arrows) and in PNA-negative rod inner segments. C, D, Double label for KV2.1 and PNA shows KV2.1 in PNA-positive cone inner segments (arrows) and in PNA-negative rod inner segments. E–G, KV8.2 (magenta) and KV2.1 (green) subunits are colocalized (merged channel, G) in the mouse inner segments. Scale bar, 5 μm.

KV channels show highly compartmentalized expression in photoreceptors

A striking feature of KV channel expression in human and mouse photoreceptors was the compartmentalized localization in the inner segment region of the photoreceptor membrane. To better define the proximal (inner) limit of KV channel localization, we immunolabeled mouse and human retina with KV2.1, and glutamine synthetase, a marker of Müller glia (Fig. 5A,B). The apical membranes of Müller cells are attached to each other and to the inner segments of photoreceptors by adherens junctions and tight-like junctions that together comprise the outer limiting membrane. In mouse retina, labeling for KV2.1 declined gradually in the proximal region of the inner segment before terminating at the level of the outer limiting membrane. In human retina, KV2.1 labeling terminated abruptly at the level of the outer limiting membrane. These data indicate that KV2 and KV8.2 channels are selectively targeted to specific regions of the photoreceptor membrane.

Protein interactions between KV8.2 and KV2 channel subunits

Our immunofluorescence data demonstrated colocalization of KV2.1 and KV8.2 in rods, and colocalization of KV2.1, KV2.2long, and KV8.2 in cones. To determine whether this colocalization reflected the presence of heteromeric KV channel complexes, as has been reported in the brain (Kihira et al., 2010), we performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments using macaque retinal lysates. Using an antibody for KV2.1 (K89) (n = 4 experiments; Fig. 6A), we were able to co-immunoprecipitate KV2.2. To confirm this interaction, we performed the reciprocal experiment, using a KV2.2long antibody (rabbit polyclonal, n = 5 experiments) and were able to co-immunoprecipitate KV2.1 (Fig. 6B). Consistent with previous studies, the KV2.1 and KV2.2long antibodies were highly specific for their target subunits (Bishop et al., 2015). The KV2.1 antibody recognized a major band at ∼110 kDa, whereas antibodies for KV2.2long detected a major band at ∼140 kDa (Fig. 6A,B). In addition to the major bands at the predicted weights of the KV subunit monomers, the KV2.1 and KV2.2long antibodies detected heavier bands at ∼250 kDa and >250 kDa that may represent nonreduced heteromeric assemblies containing KV2.1 and KV2.2long.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

KV2 and KV8.2 subunits form heteromeric complexes. A–C, Macaque retinal lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with KV2.1 (A), KV2.2L (B), or KV8.2 (C) antibodies. Control experiments were performed either with normal rabbit IgG (B, C, IgG) or with an unrelated antibody (A, Ctrl, mouse anti-VGAT). Precipitated proteins were detected by Western blotting (WB) with the antibodies indicated below each blot. KV2.1 antibodies immunoprecipitated KV2.1 and coimmunoprecipitated KV2.2long (A). KV2.2long antibodies immunoprecipitated KV2.2 long and coimmunoprecipitated KV2.1 (B). In addition to the KV2.1 and KV2.2long monomers at ∼110 and ∼130 kDa, additional heavier bands were detectable with both antibodies, suggesting detection of non-reduced heteromeric channels. C, KV8.2 antibodies coimmunoprecipitate both the KV2.1 and KV2.2long subunits. D, Example of mouse neocortical (Cx) or retinal (Ret) protein lysates probed by Western blot for KV2.1. Samples were treated at temperatures (Temp) of 4°C or 37°C in the presence or absence of AP. Note the larger electrophoretic shift in cortical lysates compared with retinal lysates with AP treatment. Similar results were obtained in tissues from 4 animals. Molecular weight (MW) markers are shown on outside lanes.

KV2.1 and KV8.2 are reported to interact in expression systems (Ottschytsch et al., 2002; Czirják et al., 2007; Smith et al., 2012); however, there is no evidence for native interactions. Moreover, to our knowledge, interactions between KV8.2 and KV2.2 have not been shown. Using the rabbit anti-KV8.2 antibody, we co-immunoprecipitated both KV2.1 (n = 2 experiments) and KV2.2 (n = 2 experiments) (Figure 6C). Because KV8.2 was expressed primarily in human and macaque photoreceptors (Fig. 1C), we conclude that the observed protein–protein interactions likely arise from photoreceptors rather than inner retinal neurons. Although the rabbit anti-KV8.2 antibody recognized the target protein for immunohistochemistry and immunoprecipitation, it did not recognize specific bands on Western blots, suggesting that optimal antibody binding depends on the tertiary structure of the epitope. We confirmed specificity of the subunit interactions by showing that KV2 proteins were not immunoprecipitated with an unrelated monoclonal antibody (Fig. 6A) or with nonimmune rabbit IgG antibody (Fig. 6B,C). Together, these data demonstrate that KV8.2 interacts with both KV2.1 and with KV2.2 in primate retina.

KV2.1 is less phosphorylated in retina compared with cortex

The KV2.1 protein has upward of ∼30 phosphorylation sites, and its membrane localization pattern and gating can be dynamically modified through phosphoregulation (Misonou et al., 2005). Changes in localization are associated with changes in phosphorylation state. For example, in cortical neurons, KV2.1 normally aggregates into large membrane clusters, but these clusters disperse when KV2.1 is dephosphorylated (Misonou et al., 2004; Bishop et al., 2015). Dephosphorylation also changes the biophysical properties of KV2.1 channels, shifting the voltage dependence of activation to substantially more hyperpolarized potentials (Misonou et al., 2004; Park et al., 2006; O'Connell et al., 2010). Given the diffuse pattern of localization of KV2.1 in photoreceptor inner segment membranes (Figs. 1, 2), we hypothesized that retina-derived KV2.1 would be less phosphorylated than KV2.1 from cortical lysates. In support of this idea, the weight of KV2.1 in macaque retinal samples was ∼110 kDa (Fig. 6), whereas in most brain regions, the molecular weight is closer to 125 kDa and can be shifted to 95–105 kDa after phosphatase treatment (Murakoshi et al., 1997; Cerda and Trimmer, 2011). To test whether KV2.1 protein is less phosphorylated in retina compared with other brain regions, we immunoblotted crude lysates of mouse cortex and retina that were treated with and without AP (Fig. 6D). In retinal lysates, AP treatment resulted in a relative electrophoretic mobility shift of KV2.1 of ∼3 ± 1.00 kDa (n = 4 mice), whereas a significantly larger shift was evident in cortical lysates ∼10 ± 0.98 kDa (t(3) = 3.18, p = 0.0008, paired t test, n = 4 mice; Fig. 6D). Because the overall level of KV2.1 expression is substantially higher in photoreceptors than in the inner retina (Fig. 1D), we reasoned that the major KV2.1 band detected in our protein experiments likely originated from photoreceptors. Our results support the notion that KV2.1 protein is less phosphorylated in photoreceptors compared with in other central neurons, a finding that may account for the diffuse localization of Kv2.1 protein in photoreceptors. The more hyperpolarized activation expected for dephosphorylated KV2.1 channels may be important for shifting the activation of these channels into the photoreceptor voltage operating range.

Functional evidence for KV2 containing channels in primate photoreceptors

Our immunohistochemical data showed that KV8.2-containing channels are expressed with KV2.1 in rods and with KV2.1 and KV2.2 in cones. What is the functional impact of these compositional differences? Do KV8.2-KV2 heteromers mediate the low-voltage–activated delayed-rectifier current (IKx) described previously in salamander rods (Beech and Barnes, 1989)? To address these questions, we made voltage-clamp recordings from rods and cones in macaque monkey retina (Fig. 7). To study the voltage dependence of rod and cone KV currents, and to compare currents with previous studies (Beech and Barnes, 1989), we voltage-clamped cells at a holding potential of −30 mV (a potential where IKx was expected to be maximally activated) and made voltage steps between 30 mV and −90 mV in 10 mV increments (Fig. 7A,B). To improve voltage-clamp and to better isolate potassium currents, we added 4 mm CsCl to the external solution to block hyperpolarization-activated currents (Ih) and replaced Ca2+ with Co2+ ions to block voltage-gated calcium, calcium-activated chloride and calcium-activated potassium channels (Barnes and Deschênes, 1992; Yagi and Macleish, 1994; Xu and Slaughter, 2005). This CoCs-Ames' solution served as the “control” solution for this and all subsequent experiments. At the holding potential of −30 mV, both rods and cones exhibited a noninactivating outward current, which was ∼5 times larger in cones (Fig. 7A,B, note difference in vertical calibration bars; Table 2). When taking the average cell capacitance into account (∼3.5× higher in cones, Table 2), the calculated current densities (pA/pF) were significantly different (Table 2). However, during our recordings, we observed that some cones were missing part or all of their outer segments, which likely contributed to the higher variance in the measured cone capacitance. Intact photoreceptors will have the highest capacitance values in the sample. Therefore, to obtain an estimate of the current density in intact photoreceptors, we calculated current density based on the maximal Cm values obtained for each dataset (cone maximum capacitance 22.3pF, rod maximum capacitance 5.26 pF). Using these maximal Cm values, the current densities in rods and cones were comparable (Table 2). These results indicate that both primate rods and cones exhibit a noninactivating outward current when held near the dark resting membrane potential.

Table 2.

Summary of gating properties of low-voltage activated KV current in rods and conesa

Cones Rods Statistics
Outward current at −30 mV (pA) 149 ± 57 (19 cells) 29 ± 4 (12 cells) t(18) = 9.09, p < 0.0001b
Cell capacitance (pF) 13.37 ± 2.98 (19 cells) 3.78 ± 0.68 (12 cells) t(21) = 13.48, p < 0.0001b
range 9.2–22.3 range 3.18–5.26
Current density (pA/pF) 11.22 ± 3.66 (19 cells) 7.75 ± 1.72 (12 cells) t(27) = 3.56, p = 0.0007b
Current density–maximum Cm (pA/pF) 6.66 ± 2.57 (19 cells) 5.44 ± 0.82 (12 cells) t(23) = 1.92, p = 0.07b
Maximal conductance 1.23 ± 0.22 nS (19 cells) 179 ± 55 pS (12 cells) t(21) = 20.45, p < 0.0001
V½ activation (mV) −55 ± 4 (19 cells) −48 ± 3 (12 cells) t(29) = 5.32, p < 0.0001c
k (mV) 4.75 ± 1.7 (19 cells) 3.79 ± 1.8 (12 cells) t(29) = 1.50, p = 0.14c
τdeact (ms) at −60 mV 116 ± 43 (13 cells) 109 ± 35 (12 cells) t(23) = 0.46, p = 0.65c
τact (ms) at −30 mV (pre-pulse −80 mV) 33 ± 14 (12 cells) 74 ± 26 (11 cells) t(15) = 4.60, p = 0.0035b

aValues are mean ± SD.

bWelch's t test (unequal variance).

ct test (equal variance)

A characteristic feature of the previously described IKx current is its slow shutoff in response to hyperpolarizing voltage steps and its slow reactivation upon repolarization (Beech and Barnes, 1989). Similarly, we found that, in both rods and cones, hyperpolarizing steps from −30 mV resulted in the development of a time-dependent inward current that reversed at the calculated K+ reversal potential (Fig. 7A,B, black traces) consistent with the slow closure of KV channels (Beech and Barnes, 1989). Upon repolarization to −30 mV, a slow tail current was activated, returning the cell to its pre-step current level (Fig. 7A–D). We measured the voltage dependence of activation from the amplitude of these tail currents and converted to conductance, based on a calculated K+ reversal potential of −98 mV. In cones, Boltzmann fits showed an average voltage of half-maximal activation (V1/2) of −55 mV, maximal conductance of 1.23 nS and a slope factor of 4.8 mV (Fig. 7E; Table 2). In rods, V1/2 for activation was significantly more depolarized (−48 mV) and the maximal conductance was lower, whereas the slope factor was comparable with cones (Fig. 7E; Table 2). To measure the activation kinetics of the IKx-like currents, we fit a single exponential to the tail currents evoked upon stepping from −80 mV to −30 mV. The mean time constant for activation of the tail currents was approximately twofold slower in rods compared with cones (Table 2). On the other hand, the deactivation time constants, fitted to currents activated upon stepping from −30 mV to −60 mV, were similar in rods and cones (Table 2). Together, these data indicate that primate rods and cones possess a low-voltage–activated current with properties similar to the IKx current described previously in amphibian retina. The activation range and kinetics of these currents differ in rods compared with cones.

In both rods and cones, the low-voltage–activated potassium conductance appeared to be maximally activated at ∼−30 mV (Fig. 7E). However, for depolarizing voltage steps positive to ∼0 mV, an additional, high-voltage–activated outward current was observed (Fig. 7A,B). This high-voltage–activated current gradually declined in amplitude during the voltage-step, consistent with slow channel inactivation. We found that, during the 500 ms voltage steps from −30 mV to 30 mV, rods showed a greater degree of inactivation than cones when measured at two fixed time points (% inactivation, mean ± SD: cones 13 ± 5.1%, 19 cells, 7 animals; rods 34 ± 11%, 12 cells, 4 animals, t(15) = 5.97, p = 2.55e-05, Welch's t test). Together, these data indicate that photoreceptors express a high-voltage–activated potassium current in addition to a low-voltage–activated potassium current. The high-voltage–activated potassium current has different gating properties in rods versus cones. In the next section, we examine the pharmacology of these distinct current components.

In salamander rods, millimolar concentrations of external Ba2+ produce a rightward shift in the voltage dependence of IKx activation, and a reduction in the slope of the activation curve (Beech and Barnes, 1989). Similar effects on the voltage dependence of activation have been reported with application of barium to oocytes expressing KV2.1/KV8.2 (Czirják et al., 2007). In monkey cones, bath application of Ba2+ (5 mm) shifted the voltage dependence of potassium channel activation to significantly more depolarized potentials (V1/2, Ctrl −54.7 ± 3.8 mV, Ba2+ −30.5 ± 11.3 mV, t(3) = 4.40, p = 0.022, paired t test, n = 4 cones; Fig. 8A–E). The slope factor of the Boltzmann fits was also significantly increased (k, Ctrl 4.8 ± 0.3 mV, Ba2+ 14.3 ± 3.7 mV, t(3) = 4.94, p = 0.016, paired t test, n = 4 cones). In addition, Ba2+ reduced the outward holding current by ∼50%, consistent with the rightward shift in the V1/2 potential resulting in a partial shutoff of the tonic IKx current (Ctrl, 134 ± 44 pA, Ba2+ 71 ± 24 pA, t(6) = 5.46, p = 0.0016, paired t test, n = 7 cones; Fig. 8A,B,F). These effects are similar to the effect of Ba2+ on heterologously expressed KV2.1/KV8.2 channels (Czirják et al., 2007). However, Ba2+ application produced a larger overlap in the activation ranges of the low- and high-threshold KV currents, which made it difficult to accurately resolve the gating parameters. Overall, the effects of Ba2+ suggest that the low-voltage–activated KV may arise from KV2.1/KV8.2 heteromeric channels.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Barium shifts the activation of the low-voltage–activated KV currents in cones. A–D, Average voltage-activated currents from macaque cones that were recorded before (A) and after (B) application of 5 mm Ba2+. Control traces represent a subset of cells shown in Fig. 7 A. Voltage step protocol is shown above traces. Tail currents are highlighted by the gray bounding box and shown on an expanded scale in C, D. The tail currents evoked from steps to −90 and −100 mV show an outward current that may be due to relief of inactivation of an A-type KV current. E, Cone conductance before (solid circles, n = 5) and after application of 5 mm Ba2+ (open circles, n = 5) (mean ± SEM) shown as a function of voltage. Solid and dashed lines indicate Boltzmann fits. F, Holding current (at −30 mV) before and after application of 5 mm Ba2+. Solid symbols represent mean ± SEM. Gray symbols represent individual cells. **t(6) = 5.46, p = 0.0016, paired t test. G, Cone conductance before (solid circles) and after application of 25 μm XE991 (open circles) (mean ± SEM, n = 3) shown as a function of voltage.

The low-voltage threshold for activation of IKx is similar to that seen for KV7-mediated currents (M currents), and previous immunohistochemical studies have reported Kv7 channels in primate photoreceptor inner segments (Zhang et al., 2011). However, Beech and Barnes (1989) argued against KV7 channels generating IKx because hallmark features of M currents, such as sensitivity to acetylcholine and blockade by Ba2+, were lacking. Similarly, we found that external Ba ions did not block the low-voltage–activated current in primate cones. To obtain further evidence to rule out the involvement of KV7 channels, we tested the effect of the selective KV7 channel blocker, XE991, on cones. Application of XE991 had no significant effect on the amplitude of the tonic outward current at −30 mV (control 234 ± 131 pA, XE991 186 ± 85 pA, t(2) = 1.33, p = 0.31, n = 3 cells, paired t test) or on the voltage dependence of activation of the low-voltage–activated KV current (V1/2 activation, control −57.2 ± 3.6 mV vs XE991 −57.4 ± 4.9 mV, t(2) = 0.31, p = 0.78, n = 3 cells; k, control 5.4 ± 1.0 mV vs XE991 4.9 ± 1.2 mV, t(2) = 0.63, p = 0.59, n = 3 cells, paired t tests; Figure 8G). Together, these data argue against the involvement of KV7 channels in generating the low-voltage–activated KV current in photoreceptors.

We next asked whether we could pharmacologically distinguish the low- and high-voltage–activated KV currents in cones. In these experiments, we measured the net voltage-gated potassium current activated during depolarizing steps from a holding potential of −70 mV. First, we tested the sensitivity of the KV current to bath application of the peptide toxin, GxTX-1E (100 nm), which has been shown to block both native and heterologously expressed homomeric KV2.1 and KV2.2 channels (Herrington et al., 2006; Liu and Bean, 2014). We found that GxTX-1E suppressed the voltage-gated current activated at potentials positive to −20 mV, whereas the current activated at more negative potentials was unaffected (35 ± 13% suppressed at 10 mV, t(3) = 4.43, p = 0.021;10 ± 30% suppressed at −30 mV, t(3) = 1.09, p = 0.35, paired t tests, n = 4 cells; Figure 9A,B). Boltzmann fits to the GxTX-1E-sensitive conductance showed a V1/2 for activation of −3.6 ± 7.0 mV and a slope factor of 8.0 ± 0.4 mV (n = 3 cones), consistent with the expected activation of homomeric KV2-containing channels in other central neurons (V1/2 ∼−10 to 10 mV) (Bishop et al., 2015; Kimm et al., 2015). We also tested the effect of focal application of GxTX-1E onto rod and cone inner segments during step depolarizations from −30 mV to 40 mV (Fig. 9C). Under these conditions, GxTX-1E suppressed the gated current by an average of 60 ± 16% in 6 rods and 64 ± 45% in 2 cones. The toxin did not affect the standing outward current at the −30 mV holding potential (Fig. 9C), consistent with a lack of effect on IKx. Together, these data support the presence of two functionally distinct populations of KV channels in primate cones: (1) a GxTX-1E-sensitive, high-voltage–activated KV current that likely arises from homomeric KV2 channels; and (2) a GxTX-1E-insensitive, low-voltage–activated current that is similar to IKx and may arise from KV2/KV8.2 heteromers. Previous studies indicate that modifier subunits can alter the sensitivity of KV2 channels to peptide toxins, such as stromatoxin and GxTX-1E as well as to small-molecule blockers, such as 4-AP (for review, see Bocksteins, 2016). For example, in expression systems, the modifier subunit KV6.3 renders KV2.1 channels less sensitive to GxTX-1E (Moreno-Domínguez et al., 2009), and it is possible that KV8.2 may alter KV2.1 pharmacology in a similar way. We cannot, however, rule out the possibility that another type of KV channel mediates the low-voltage–activated current.

Additional evidence for the presence of functionally distinct populations of KV channels in cones is provided by the effects of the clinically used antidepressant citalopram. Citalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, suppresses homomeric KV2.1- and KV2.2-mediated currents in expression systems (Zhan et al., 2012). Bath application of citalopram caused a dose-dependent suppression of the high-voltage–activated KV currents; at a test potential of 40 mV, the IC50 for citalopram blockade was 6.6 μm (Fig. 10A,B). Conversely, the low-voltage–activated KV currents (test potential −40 mV) were relatively resistant to citalopram (Fig. 10C). In summary, analysis of the voltage-dependent currents and their sensitivity to Ba2+, GxTX-1E, and citalopram provide strong evidence for functional KV2-containing channels in primate cones.

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Citalopram blocks a high-voltage–activated current in cones. A, Representative voltage-gated currents before (black trace) and after application of 10 μm (blue traces) or 50 μm (red traces) citalopram. The measurement time was 450 ms after the onset of a 500 ms voltage step. Note the suppressive effect of citalopram only for the more depolarized step potential. B, Average (± SEM) voltage-gated currents in response to a series of 500 ms voltage steps from a holding potential of −70 mV in control solution (Ctrl-CoCs Ames') or after wash-in of increasing concentrations of citalopram. The number of cells tested for each concentration is shown in parentheses. C, Dose–response curve showing relative block of citalopram at a test potential of −40 mV (open circles) or 40 mV. Data points were fitted using the Hill equation.

Discussion

Mutations in KV8.2 lead to retinal dysfunction in humans, but the basis of these deficits is not well understood. Our data indicate that KV8.2 is expressed with KV2.1 in rod inner segments, and with KV2.1 and KV2.2 in cone inner segments in human retina. KV8.2 interacts with both KV2 subunits in macaque retinal lysates and KV2.1 protein is less phosphorylated in retina than in cortical lysates. Finally, we describe two distinct KV currents in rods and cones; a high-voltage–activated current sensitive to GxTX-1E and citalopram that likely arises from homomeric KV2 channels; and a low-voltage–activated current that is resistant to these agents and may arise from KV2/KV8.2 heteromeric channels.

KV2 and KV8 channels in photoreceptors

Figure 11 summarizes the localization of the KV2 and KV8.2 channel subunits. Our findings extend upon previous studies showing KV8.2 and KV2.1 gene expression in human (Wu et al., 2006), rat (Hölter et al., 2012), and mouse (Czirják et al., 2007) retina. In agreement with our findings, KV2.1 protein has been localized to mouse photoreceptor inner segments (Pinto and Klumpp, 1998) and KV2.2 protein is present in developing Xenopus retina (Gravagna et al., 2008). Interestingly, the genes encoding KV8.2 and KV2.1 are subject to circadian modulation, showing increased levels during nocturnal hours in rat retina (Hölter et al., 2012). We speculate that such changes in KV8.2 levels could lead to dynamic modulation of KV2 currents under different physiological conditions. In addition to cyclical changes in gene expression, further dynamic modulation could arise through variable phosphorylation of channel subunits, especially for KV2.1.

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Schematic diagram summarizing the localization of KV2 and KV8.2 channel subunits in mouse and primate retina. Green shading represents the region where KV channel subunits are concentrated. ms, Mouse; mk, macaque; hu, human.

We showed lower levels of KV2.2 protein in S cones than in L/M cones. Although we did not attempt to differentiate cone types in our functional recordings, lower levels of KV2.2 might be expected to alter the temporal response properties of S cones. A recent study in goldfish retina showed that S cones have smaller Ih currents than L/M cones, a difference that slows the voltage responses of S cones despite both cone types having comparable photocurrent kinetics (Howlett et al., 2017). Together, these data indicate that differences in voltage-gated ion channel expression distinguish S cones from L/M cones, furthering evidence for molecular differences between cone types (for review, see Calkins, 2001).

Implications for normal photoreceptor function

We have described a KV current that activates with a V1/2 of ∼−48 mV in rods and a V1/2 of ∼−55 mV in cones. The rod current is similar to that described previously in salamander rods (V1/2 of ∼−46.4 mV) (Beech and Barnes, 1989). The more negative activation of the cone KV current aligns with the relatively more hyperpolarized operating range of macaque cones (∼−46 to −58 mV cones, ∼−37 to −55 mV rods, see Schneeweis and Schnapf, 1995). The observed difference in activation between rods and cones might be accounted for by inclusion of the KV2.2 subunit in cones; indeed, in expression systems, KV2.2 homomers exhibit relatively more hyperpolarized activation potentials (∼−7 mV shift) than homomeric KV2.1 channels (but see Kihira et al., 2010; Bishop et al., 2015).

Two other KV types have been proposed to underlie IKx-KV7 (M-type) channels (Zhang et al., 2011) and ether-à-go-go (EAG) channels (Frings et al., 1998). The lack of effect of a selective blocker of KV7 channels would seem to rule out a major role for these channels in producing IKx in monkey photoreceptors. Although EAG channels have been localized to bovine photoreceptors by ISH (Frings et al., 1998), they seem unlikely to mediate the IKx current because Ba2+ produces strong inactivation and suppression of EAG currents without altering the voltage dependence of activation. By contrast, Ba2+ does not block the low-voltage–activated currents described here but causes a depolarizing shift in activation potential. EAG currents also deactivate much faster than IKx (<10 ms vs ∼100 ms at −40 mV) (Frings et al., 1998).

The peptide toxins, stromatoxin-1 and GxTX-1E, block expressed homomeric KV2.1 and KV2.2 channels (Escoubas et al., 2002), and native channels in some central neurons (Speca et al., 2014; e.g., Liu and Bean, 2014; Bishop et al., 2015; Kimm et al., 2015). However, stromatoxin-1 had no effect on MNTB neurons, which are known to express KV2 channels (Johnston et al., 2008). These variable pharmacological effects might be accounted for by the presence of modifier subunits, which can reduce the sensitivity for GxTX-1E compared with homomeric KV2.1 channels (Moreno-Domínguez et al., 2009). These findings suggest that the low-voltage–activated GxTX-1E-insensitive current in photoreceptors could arise from heteromeric KV2/KV8.2 channel complexes, but we cannot exclude the involvement of another type of Kv channel. The high-voltage–activated current component, which was sensitive to GxTX-1E and citalopram, very likely originates from homomeric KV2 channels.

In other central neurons, homomeric KV2 channels activate at potentials positive to ∼−40 mV; thus, while they play important roles in spiking neurons, they would be expected to contribute little current over the photoreceptor operating range. There are several features of photoreceptor KV2 channels that could shift the voltage dependence of activation to more hyperpolarized potentials. First, the presence of KV8.2 can induce a negative shift in the activation threshold for KV2 channels by ∼20 mV in oocytes (Czirják et al., 2007), although this shift is not observed in HEK293 cells, suggesting that the native environment may influence channel gating. Second, the diffuse localization of KV2.1 in photoreceptor membranes and the small electrophoretic shift of KV2.1 with phosphatase treatment suggest that KV2.1 is less phosphorylated in retina than in cortical neurons. Upon dephosphorylation, KV2.1 channels decluster and the V1/2 for activation can shift by up to −35 mV (Murakoshi et al., 1997; Park et al., 2006). The recent discovery of complexes comprised of KV2.1 subunits, KV6.4 (a modifier subunit) and the β auxiliary subunit KCNE5, indicate diverse mechanisms for tailoring KV2 channel biophysical properties (David et al., 2015). In summary, the presence of the KV8.2 subunit and the hypophosphorylated state of retinal KV2.1 could shift KV2 activation into the operating range of photoreceptors.

In response to dim light stimuli, the tonic IKx current that is active at rest shuts off with a delay producing a depolarization that makes the voltage response more transient and bandpass filtered (Beech and Barnes, 1989; Barrow and Wu, 2009). With brighter flash intensities, an Ih current also activates, exerting a similar depolarizing effect (Cangiano et al., 2007; Barrow and Wu, 2009; Della Santina et al., 2012). In oocytes that express KV2.1/KV8.2, a similar filtering effect is observed when cells are injected with current to simulate the light response (Czirják et al., 2007). Together, the KV2.1/KV8.2 is a strong candidate for mediating the low-voltage–activated IKx current in primate photoreceptors.

Implications for KCNV2 cone-rod dystrophy

Patients with KCNV2 mutations exhibit deficits in rod-, L/M-, and S cone–mediated responses (Stockman et al., 2014), although subjective reports of night blindness vary across subjects (Robson et al., 2010; Zobor et al., 2012). Despite these widespread functional deficits, gross degenerative changes appear to be restricted to the macula region (Sergouniotis et al., 2012; Zobor et al., 2012), suggesting that KCNV2 mutations might differentially impact rod and cone survival.

KCNV2 mutations affect different parts of the protein with varying consequences. For example, pore domain mutations in KV8.2 impair conduction of KV2.1/KV8.2 heteromers, whereas mutations in the tetramerization domain prevent heteromer formation, thus increasing the number of homomeric KV2.1 channels. Because homomeric KV2.1 channels show a higher level of steady-state inactivation than KV2.1/KV8.2 heteromers (Smith et al., 2012) and are not activated at typical cone resting potentials, both types of mutations should reduce IK and depolarize the resting potential. This shift, in turn, could increase activation of L-type calcium channels and trigger calcium-dependent neurodegenerative mechanisms (Kulkarni et al., 2016). A depolarized resting membrane potential might also account for the pathognomonic electroretinogram (ERG) findings observed in patients with KCNV2 mutations. These individuals exhibit markedly reduced ERG amplitudes and temporal deficits for dim light stimuli, but “supernormal” or augmented ERG responses at brighter stimulus intensities (Gouras et al., 1983; Wissinger et al., 2008). A possible explanation is that loss of IKx depolarizes the resting potential such that the voltage-gated calcium current no longer varies linearly with changes in light intensity. The result is that brighter stimuli are required to shut off transmitter release; and when this threshold is reached, a “supernormal” postreceptoral response (b-wave) manifests in the ERG.

The initial negative deflection of the ERG (a-wave) originates from the light-induced hyperpolarization of photoreceptors. Patients with KCNV2 mutations show a prolongation of the a-wave, which manifests as a broadened “trough.” This ERG abnormality is consistent with the idea that KV2/KV8.2 heteromeric channels contribute to the delayed depolarizing phase of the photovoltage response: with reduced or absent KV current deactivation, the light-induced photoreceptor hyperpolarization becomes more sustained. The marked deficits in photopic flicker sensitivity seen with ERG are also consistent with a role for KV2/KV8.2 heteromeric channels in temporal signaling. Together, these findings support a central role for KV2/KV8.2 channels in shaping the human photoreceptor voltage response.

Footnotes

This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants EY024265 to T.P., P30 EY010572 and T32 EY23211 to Oregon Health & Science University, P51OD011092 to Oregon National Primate Research Center, and P30 EY003176 to University of California, Berkeley. We thank Dr. Rowland Taylor for helpful feedback on the manuscript; and Drs. John Ng and David Wilson (Oregon Health & Science University) for providing human retinal samples.

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Aslanidis A, Karlstetter M, Walczak Y, Jägle H, Langmann T (2014) RETINA-specific expression of Kcnv2 is controlled by cone-rod homeobox (Crx) and neural retinaleucine zipper (Nrl). Adv Exp Med Biol 801:31–41. 10.1007/978-1-4614-3209-8_5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes S, Deschênes MC (1992) Contribution of Ca and Ca-activated Cl channels to regenerative depolarization and membrane bistability of cone photoreceptors. J Neurophysiol 68:745–755. 10.1152/jn.1992.68.3.745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrow AJ, Wu SM (2009) Low-conductance HCN1 ion channels augment the frequency response of rod and cone photoreceptors. J Neurosci 29:5841–5853. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5746-08.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beech DJ, Barnes S (1989) Characterization of a voltage-gated K+ channel that accelerates the rod response to dim light. Neuron 3:573–581. 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90267-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bishop HI, Guan D, Bocksteins E, Parajuli LK, Murray KD, Cobb MM, Misonou H, Zito K, Foehring RC, Trimmer JS (2015) Distinct cell- and layer-specific expression patterns and independent regulation of Kv2 channel subtypes in cortical pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 35:14922–14942. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1897-15.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bocksteins E. (2016) Kv5, Kv6, Kv8, and Kv9 subunits: no simple silent bystanders. J Gen Physiol 147:105–125. 10.1085/jgp.201511507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bocksteins E, Snyders DJ (2012) Electrically silent Kv subunits: their molecular and functional characteristics. Physiology (Bethesda) 27:73–84. 10.1152/physiol.00023.2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Calkins DJ. (2001) Seeing with S cones. Prog Retin Eye Res 20:255–287. 10.1016/S1350-9462(00)00026-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cangiano L, Gargini C, Della Santina L, Demontis GC, Cervetto L (2007) High-pass filtering of input signals by the Ih current in a non-spiking neuron, the retinal rod bipolar cell. PLoS One 2:e1327. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cerda O, Trimmer JS (2011) Activity-dependent phosphorylation of neuronal Kv2.1 potassium channels by CDK5. J Biol Chem 286:28738–28748. 10.1074/jbc.M111.251942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chiquet C, Dkhissi-Benyahya O, Chounlamountri N, Szel A, Degrip WJ, Cooper HM (2002) Characterization of calbindin-positive cones in primates. Neuroscience 115:1323–1333. 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00327-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Czirják G, Tóth ZE, Enyedi P (2007) Characterization of the heteromeric potassium channel formed by Kv2.1 and the retinal subunit Kv8.2 in Xenopus oocytes. J Neurophysiol 98:1213–1222. 10.1152/jn.00493.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. David JP, Stas JI, Schmitt N, Bocksteins E (2015) Auxiliary KCNE subunits modulate both homotetrameric Kv2.1 and heterotetrameric Kv2.1/Kv6.4 channels. Sci Rep 5:12813. 10.1038/srep12813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Della Santina L, Piano I, Cangiano L, Caputo A, Ludwig A, Cervetto L, Gargini C (2012) Processing of retinal signals in normal and HCN deficient mice. PLoS One 7:e29812. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Escoubas P, Diochot S, Célérier ML, Nakajima T, Lazdunski M (2002) Novel tarantula toxins for subtypes of voltage-dependent potassium channels in the Kv2 and Kv4 subfamilies. Mol Pharmacol 62:48–57. 10.1124/mol.62.1.48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Frings S, Brüll N, Dzeja C, Angele A, Hagen V, Kaupp UB, Baumann A (1998) Characterization of ether-à-go-go channels present in photoreceptors reveals similarity to IKx, a K+ current in rod inner segments. J Gen Physiol 111:583–599. 10.1085/jgp.111.4.583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gouras P, Eggers HM, MacKay CJ (1983) Cone dystrophy, nyctalopia, and supernormal rod responses: a new retinal degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 101:718–724. 10.1001/archopht.1983.01040010718003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gravagna NG, Knoeckel CS, Taylor AD, Hultgren BA, Ribera AB (2008) Localization of Kv2.2 protein in Xenopus laevis embryos and tadpoles. J Comp Neurol 510:508–524. 10.1002/cne.21804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Guan D, Tkatch T, Surmeier DJ, Armstrong WE, Foehring RC (2007) Kv2 subunits underlie slowly inactivating potassium current in rat neocortical pyramidal neurons. J Physiol 581:941–960. 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.128454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Herrington J, Zhou YP, Bugianesi RM, Dulski PM, Feng Y, Warren VA, Smith MM, Kohler MG, Garsky VM, Sanchez M, Wagner M, Raphaelli K, Banerjee P, Ahaghotu C, Wunderler D, Priest BT, Mehl JT, Garcia ML, McManus OB, Kaczorowski GJ, et al. (2006) Blockers of the delayed-rectifier potassium current in pancreatic beta-cells enhance glucose-dependent insulin secretion. Diabetes 55:1034–1042. 10.2337/diabetes.55.04.06.db05-0788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hölter P, Kunst S, Wolloscheck T, Kelleher DK, Sticht C, Wolfrum U, Spessert R (2012) The retinal clock drives the expression of Kcnv2, a channel essential for visual function and cone survival. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:6947–6954. 10.1167/iovs.12-10234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Howlett MH, Smith RG, Kamermans M (2017) A novel mechanism of cone photoreceptor adaptation. PLoS Biol 15:1–28. 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnston J, Griffin SJ, Baker C, Skrzypiec A, Chernova T, Forsythe ID (2008) Initial segment Kv2.2 channels mediate a slow delayed rectifier and maintain high frequency action potential firing in medial nucleus of the trapezoid body neurons. J Physiol 586:3493–3509. 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.153734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jorge BS, Campbell CM, Miller AR, Rutter ED, Gurnett CA, Vanoye CG, George AL Jr, Kearney JA (2011) Voltage-gated potassium channel KCNV2 (Kv8.2) contributes to epilepsy susceptibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:5443–5448. 10.1073/pnas.1017539108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kihira Y, Hermanstyne TO, Misonou H (2010) Formation of heteromeric Kv2 channels in mammalian brain neurons. J Biol Chem 285:15048–15055. 10.1074/jbc.M109.074260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kimm T, Khaliq ZM, Bean BP (2015) Differential regulation of action potential shape and burst-frequency firing by BK and Kv2 channels in substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons. J Neurosci 35:16404–16417. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5291-14.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kulkarni M, Trifunović D, Schubert T, Euler T, Paquet-Durand F (2016) Calcium dynamics change in degenerating cone photoreceptors. Hum Mol Genet 25:3729–3740. 10.1093/hmg/ddw219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu PW, Bean BP (2014) Kv2 channel regulation of action potential repolarization and firing patterns in superior cervical ganglion neurons and hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 34:4991–5002. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1925-13.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Misonou H, Mohapatra DP, Park EW, Leung V, Zhen D, Misonou K, Anderson AE, Trimmer JS (2004) Regulation of ion channel localization and phosphorylation by neuronal activity. Nat Neurosci 7:711–718. 10.1038/nn1260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Misonou H, Mohapatra DP, Trimmer JS (2005) Kv2.1: a voltage-gated K+ channel critical to dynamic control of neuronal excitability. Neurotoxicology 26:743–752. 10.1016/j.neuro.2005.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Moreno-Domínguez A, Cidad P, Miguel-Velado E, López-López JR, Pérez-García MT (2009) De novo expression of Kv6.3 contributes to changes in vascular smooth muscle cell excitability in a hypertensive mice strain. J Physiol 587:625–640. 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.165217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Murakoshi H, Shi G, Scannevin RH, Trimmer JS (1997) Phosphorylation of the Kv2.1 K+ channel alters voltage-dependent activation. Mol Pharmacol 52:821–828. 10.1124/mol.52.5.821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. O'Connell KM, Loftus R, Tamkun MM (2010) Localization-dependent activity of the Kv2.1 delayed-rectifier K+ channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:12351–12356. 10.1073/pnas.1003028107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. O'Roak BJ, Vives L, Girirajan S, Karakoc E, Krumm N, Coe BP, Levy R, Ko A, Lee C, Smith JD, Turner EH, Stanaway IB, Vernot B, Malig M, Baker C, Reilly B, Akey JM, Borenstein E, Rieder MJ, Nickerson DA, et al. (2012) Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations. Nature 485:246–250. 10.1038/nature10989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ottschytsch N, Raes A, Van Hoorick D, Snyders DJ (2002) Obligatory heterotetramerization of three previously uncharacterized Kv channel alpha-subunits identified in the human genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:7986–7991. 10.1073/pnas.122617999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Park KS, Mohapatra DP, Misonou H, Trimmer JS (2006) Graded regulation of the Kv2.1 potassium channel by variable phosphorylation. Science 313:976–979. 10.1126/science.1124254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pinto LH, Klumpp DJ (1998) Localization of potassium channels in the retina. Prog Retin Eye Res 17:207–230. 10.1016/S1350-9462(97)00011-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Puthussery T, Gayet-Primo J, Taylor WR (2011) Carbonic anhydrase-related protein VIII is expressed in rod bipolar cells and alters signaling at the rod bipolar to AII-amacrine cell synapse in the mammalian retina. Eur J Neurosci 34:1419–1431. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07861.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Puthussery T, Venkataramani S, Gayet-Primo J, Smith RG, Taylor WR (2013) NaV1.1 channels in axon initial segments of bipolar cells augment input to magnocellular visual pathways in the primate retina. J Neurosci 33:16045–16059. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1249-13.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Robson AG, Webster AR, Michaelides M, Downes SM, Cowing JA, Hunt DM, Moore AT, Holder GE (2010) Cone dystrophy with supernormal rod electroretinogram: a comprehensive genotype/phenotype study including fundus autofluorescence and extensive electrophysiology. Retina 30:51–62. 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181bfe24e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schneeweis DM, Schnapf JL (1995) Photovoltage of rods and cones in the macaque retina. Science 268:1053–1056. 10.1126/science.7754386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sergouniotis PI, Holder GE, Robson AG, Michaelides M, Webster AR, Moore AT (2012) High-resolution optical coherence tomography imaging in KCNV2 retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 96:213–217. 10.1136/bjo.2011.203638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Smith KE, Wilkie SE, Tebbs-Warner JT, Jarvis BJ, Gallasch L, Stocker M, Hunt DM (2012) Functional analysis of missense mutations in Kv8.2 causing cone dystrophy with supernormal rod electroretinogram. J Biol Chem 287:43972–43983. 10.1074/jbc.M112.388033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Speca DJ, Ogata G, Mandikian D, Bishop HI, Wiler SW, Eum K, Wenzel HJ, Doisy ET, Matt L, Campi KL, Golub MS, Nerbonne JM, Hell JW, Trainor BC, Sack JT, Schwartzkroin PA, Trimmer JS (2014) Deletion of the Kv2.1 delayed rectifier potassium channel leads to neuronal and behavioral hyperexcitability. Genes Brain Behav 13:394–408. 10.1111/gbb.12120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Stockman A, Henning GB, Michaelides M, Moore AT, Webster AR, Cammack J, Ripamonti C (2014) Cone dystrophy with “supernormal” rod ERG: psychophysical testing shows comparable rod and cone temporal sensitivity losses with no gain in rod function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:832–840. 10.1167/iovs.13-12919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wei W, Elstrott J, Feller MB (2010) Two-photon targeted recording of GFP-expressing neurons for light responses and live-cell imaging in the mouse retina. Nat Protoc 5:1347–1352. 10.1038/nprot.2010.106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wissinger B, Dangel S, Jägle H, Hansen L, Baumann B, Rudolph G, Wolf C, Bonin M, Koeppen K, Ladewig T, Kohl S, Zrenner E, Rosenberg T (2008) Cone dystrophy with supernormal rod response is strictly associated with mutations in KCNV2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:751–757. 10.1167/iovs.07-0471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wissinger B, Schaich S, Baumann B, Bonin M, Jägle H, Friedburg C, Varsányi B, Hoyng CB, Dollfus H, Heckenlively JR, Rosenberg T, Rudolph G, Kellner U, Salati R, Plomp A, De Baere E, Andrassi-Darida M, Sauer A, Wolf C, Zobor D, et al. (2011) Large deletions of the KCNV2 gene are common in patients with cone dystrophy with supernormal rod response. Hum Mutat 32:1398–1406. 10.1002/humu.21580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wu H, Cowing JA, Michaelides M, Wilkie SE, Jeffery G, Jenkins SA, Mester V, Bird AC, Robson AG, Holder GE, Moore AT, Hunt DM, Webster AR (2006) Mutations in the gene KCNV2 encoding a voltage-gated potassium channel subunit cause “cone dystrophy with supernormal rod electroretinogram” in humans. Am J Hum Genet 79:574–579. 10.1086/507568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu JW, Slaughter MM (2005) Large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channels facilitate transmitter release in salamander rod synapse. J Neurosci 25:7660–7668. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1572-05.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yagi T, Macleish PR (1994) Ionic conductances of monkey solitary cone inner segments. J Neurophysiol 71:656–665. 10.1152/jn.1994.71.2.656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yan K, Matthews G (1992) Blockers of potassium channels reduce the outward dark current in rod photoreceptor inner segments. Vis Neurosci 8:479–481. 10.1017/S0952523800004983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zelinger L, Wissinger B, Eli D, Kohl S, Sharon D, Banin E (2013) Cone dystrophy with supernormal rod response: novel KCNV2 mutations in an underdiagnosed phenotype. Ophthalmology 120:2338–2343. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.03.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhan XQ, He YL, Yao JJ, Zhuang JL, Mei YA (2012) The antidepressant citalopram inhibits delayed rectifier outward K+ current in mouse cortical neurons. J Neurosci Res 90:324–336. 10.1002/jnr.22744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang X, Yang D, Hughes BA (2011) KCNQ5/Kv7.5 potassium channel expression and subcellular localization in primate retinal pigment epithelium and neural retina. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 301:1017–1026. 10.1152/ajpcell.00185.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zobor D, Kohl S, Wissinger B, Zrenner E, Jägle H (2012) Rod and cone function in patients with KCNV2 retinopathy. PLoS One 7:e46762. 10.1371/journal.pone.0046762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuroscience

RESOURCES