Abstract
Tumor stroma has an active role in the initiation, growth, and propagation of many tumor types by secreting growth factors and modulating redox status of the microenvironment. Although PPARβ/δ in fibroblasts was shown to modulate oxidative stress in the wound microenvironment, there has been no evidence of a similar effect in the tumor stroma. Here, we present evidence of oxidative stress modulation by intestinal stromal PPARβ/δ, using a FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mouse model and validated it with immortalized cell lines. The FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice developed fewer intestinal polyps and survived longer when compared with Pparb/dfl/fl mice. The pre-treatment of FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− and Pparb/dfl/fl with antioxidant N-acetyl-cysteine prior DSS-induced tumorigenesis resulted in lower tumor load. Gene expression analyses implicated an altered oxidative stress processes. Indeed, the FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− intestinal tumors have reduced oxidative stress than Pparb/dfl/fl tumors. Similarly, the colorectal cancer cells and human colon epithelial cells also experienced lower oxidative stress when co-cultured with fibroblasts depleted of PPARβ/δ expression. Therefore, our results establish a role for fibroblast PPARβ/δ in epithelial–mesenchymal communication for ROS homeostasis.
Introduction
Tumor initiation, growth, and propagation are frequently accompanied by desmoplasia and acquisition of a reactive stroma, mainly comprising leukocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells [1]. The dynamic and reciprocal relationship between epithelial and mesenchymal compartments of the tumor dictates almost every aspect of cancer progression, even governing the efficacy of therapy and influencing the risk of disease relapse [2]. This epithelial–mesenchymal communication has been usually ascribed to a complex signaling network of growth factors and cytokines. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have also been identified as potent modifiers of signaling pathways and consequently cell behavior. The balance between production of ROS and their elimination by antioxidants is important for tissue homeostasis [3, 4]. Microenvironmental oxidative stress conjures protective antioxidant response from tissues to regain homeostasis. However, ROS imbalance or the loss of homeostatic control in a continued oxidative microenvironment can either result in cell death caused by oxidative catastrophe or contribute to carcinogenesis, which are tissue- and context-dependent [5–7]. Indeed, ROS are by-products of aberrant cancer cell metabolism and mitochondrial defects. However, little is known about the effect of tumor modulating ROS signals by fibroblasts, the most prominent cell type in tumor microenvironment.
Recent study showed that a deficiency in fibroblast peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor β/δ (PPARβ/δ) increased oxidative stress in wound microenvironment to delay keratinocyte migration [8]. PPARβ/δ has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, its role remains controversial as both pro- and anti-tumorigenic roles was reported from studies using conventional PPARβ/δ-knockout mice [9, 10]. On one hand, PPARβ/δ has been shown to exert potent pro-tumorigenic effects. Early study suggested that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduced tumorigenesis through inhibition of PPARβ/δ [11]. PPARβ/δ has been shown to promote UV-induced skin tumorigenesis by upregulating Src expression and activity thereby enhancing the downstream EGFR/Erk1/2 pathway [12]. PPARβ/δ also enhanced CRC progression by regulating Glut1 and SLC10A5 expression, promoting cancer cell metabolic programming [13]. PPARβ/δ also promoted angiogenesis by stimulating the expression of VEGF in CRC and bladder cancer [14–16]. In addition, PPARβ/δ promoted a pro-tumorigenic inflammatory environment through the increased production of COX-2-derived PGE2 [16]. On the other hand, PPARβ/δ has also been reported to exert potent anti-inflammatory functions through interfering with the functions of transcription factors such as NFκB, AP1, STAT3 [17]. In melanoma, PPARβ/δ exhibited inhibitory effects on tumorigenicity via the modulation of inflammatory and apoptotic mechanisms [18]. In apparent discrepancies with earlier studies, several studies showed that NSAIDs increased PPARβ/δ expression in human CRC cell lines, suggesting that elevated PPARβ/δ level, rather than decreased level, contributed to the chemopreventive effects of NSAIDs. Using a tissue-specific approach to delineate the problem, subsequent studies using an intestinal epithelia-specific deletion and transgene overexpression of PPARβ/δ in mice supported a pro-tumorigenic role for epithelial PPARβ/δ [19, 20]. Recent work on skin squamous cell carcinoma showed that the expression of PPARβ/δ was reduced in cancer-associated fibroblasts [21]. Further investigation revealed that PPARβ/δ in cancer-associated fibroblasts reduced the invasiveness, xenobiotic resistance and cellular bioenergetics of the adjacent epithelial cancer, at least, in part via the secretion of growth factors and cytokines [21]. However, the role of fibroblast PPARβ/δ in the initiation and progression of CRC remains unclear.
Our understanding on the role of fibroblasts in pathologic conditions is hampered by the absence of specific markers. Fibroblast-specific protein (FSP)1 (or S100A-4) has been suggested as a fibroblast-specific marker in normal and fibrotic tissues. The intestinal mesenchyme comprises of a heterogeneous population of stromal cells of varying origins [22]. FSP1-directed deletion occurs in fibroblast subpopulation that had an active FSP1 promoter activity. Although FSP1 has been identified as a fibroblast marker and used for fibroblast depletion [23, 24], the complete coverage of the entire fibroblast population by a single marker has proven to be tricky. Although FSP1 is only expressed in the mesenchymal lineage and commonly used for stromal-specific gene deletion strategy, it is lowly expressed if at all, in matured fibroblasts and myofibroblasts. Despite these limitations, FSP1 reporter mice and FSP1-Cre-driven gene deletion are considered reliable strategies to investigate fibroblast biology. Transgenic mice with green fluorescent protein expression driven by the FSP1 promoter have been used to map cell fate in fibroblast populations, and that FSP1-Cre animals have served as important tools to dissect the effects of fibroblast-specific gene deletion in fibrotic and neoplastic conditions. FSP1-directed deletion of genes, like Smoothened, PTEN, TGF receptor type II, and BMP receptor 2 in the fibroblasts have been used to study their roles in different tumor types such as acinar–ductal metaplasia, prostate, breast, and squamous cell carcinoma of the forestomach [25–28].
Drawing on the parallels between wound healing and cancer, we investigated the role of fibroblast PPARβ/δ in CRC. We generated a mouse whose PPARβ/δ gene was deleted in the fibroblasts (FSPCre-Pparb/d−/−) by crossing a floxed PPARβ/δ mouse (Pparb/d fl/fl) [29] with transgenic mice with a Cre transgene under the control of FSP1 promoter (FSP1-Cre) [30]. The FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice developed fewer CRC when compared to their Pparb/dfl/fl littermates, regardless of genetic-, or chemical-induced carcinogenesis. Microarray gene expression analyses revealed an altered oxidative processes in adjacent intestinal or tumor epithelium of FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice. We recapitulated the reduced oxidative stress phenotype in two human intestinal cancer cell lines (HCT116 and HT29) when co-cultured with colonic fibroblasts from FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice or fibroblasts whose endogenous PPARβ/δ were suppressed by siRNA. Taken together, our results indicate that PPARβ/δ expression in fibroblast modulates oxidative responses in the adjacent epithelium, and oxidative stress may be an initiating factor in CRC.
Results and discussion
PPARβ/δ expression is ablated in colonic fibroblasts of FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice
We generated a transgenic mouse line harboring a fibroblast-specific deletion of PPARβ/δ exon 4 allele (FSPCre-Pparb/d−/−) (Sng et al., in revision). To study fibroblast PPARβ/δ ablation in the gastrointestinal tract, we examined the deletion PPARβ/δ exon 4 in the different colonic tissue layers of the FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− transgenic mice by dissecting the mucosa villi, stroma laminal propria and muscularis layers with a laser dissecting microscope (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Fig. 1A–D). Subsequent PCR and DNA gel analysis confirmed the deletion of exon 4 of PPARβ/δ gene has occurred in the intestinal fibroblasts, which were enriched in the locality of the stroma lamina propria region (Fig. 1b). To examine PPARβ/δ protein expression in colonic stroma, we enriched for colonic fibroblasts from FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− and their Pparb/dfl/fl littermates by the fibroblast explant method. Our analysis of explanted FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− fibroblasts showed a 60 and 80% decrease in PPARβ/δ protein and mRNA levels, respectively, when compared with Pparb/dfl/fl littermates (Fig. 1c, d). The observed residual PPARβ/δ expression may be contributed by two technical difficulties. As mentioned above, FSP1 promoter is active in a subpopulation of fibroblasts. Although, the explant method is a reliable method to enrich and culture primary fibroblasts in vitro, it is also inevitable that other cell types such as endothelial cells and inflammatory immune cells from the stroma might have contaminated the culture [22, 31]. Importantly, our observation mirrored that in other studies where FSP1 promoter-driven gene deletion was targeted to the stroma of breast and pancreatic tissues [26, 30]. Taken together, we have established that the FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− colonic mesenchyme harbors perturbed PPARβ/δ expression.
Loss in fibroblast PPARβ/δ expression delays intestinal tumorigenesis
To investigate the effects of fibroblast PPARβ/δ expression on intestinal tumorigenesis, we employed three commonly used murine models, chemical (azoxymethane, AOM, and dextran sulfate sodium, DSS), genetic (APCmin/+), and combined (APCmin/+ with DSS) approaches to induce colon tumors in FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice.
Ulcerative colitis and inflammatory bowel syndrome are common risk factors associated with CRC development [32, 33]. Well-established animal models for ulcerative colitis and inflammatory bowel syndrome have used DSS to induce colitis in mice, thus DSS was used to induce intestinal inflammation in two of the murine models. We investigated whether there were differences in the inflammatory processes that lead to tumor initiation. In DSS-induced colitis, the FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice yielded a lower disease activity index (DAI) (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 2), reduced DSS-induced morphological aberrations and loss of the mucosa layer (Fig. 2b, c) when compared with wild-type littermates. No significant difference in colon lengths was observed (Fig. 2d). Consistent with the lower disease severity, we detected a reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and an increase of anti-inflammatory cytokines in FSPCre-Pparb/d −/− when compared with Pparb/d fl/fl mice as determined by multiplex immunoassay (Supplementary Table 1). These observations suggest that a deficiency in fibroblast PPARβ/δ confers some protection against colitis, possibly by modulating an inflammatory response.
Next, we looked at chemical induction of colon tumors using AOM/DSS treatment. In similar fashion to our colitis experiment, the FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice demonstrated better survival and DAI over the course of AOM/DSS treatment, compared to the wild-type (Pparb/dfl/fl) mice (Fig. 2e, f). The FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice also produced 50% fewer and smaller tumors when compared with Pparb/dfl/fl littermates (Fig. 2g–j). The results showed that the FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− genetic background confers a protection against CRC in mice, suggesting that fibroblast PPARβ/δ is important in the promotion of tumor development.
To study intestinal tumor formation in a spontaneous CRC murine model, we crossed FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice to an APCmin/+ background (Supplementary Figure 1E–M). APCmin/+ mice were either allowed to spontaneously develop tumors or stimulated chemically by a 1-week DSS treatment course. First, we noted a lower DAI in APCmin/+ transgenic mice on the FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− background (Supplementary Figure 1E & F). In both models, we also noted that mice deficient in fibroblast PPARβ/δ were more resistant to the disease burden of tumor development (Supplementary Figure 1G) as suggested by higher survival rates (Supplementary Figure 1H & K). The mice deficient in fibroblast PPARβ/δ also developed fewer and smaller tumors compared to cognate wild-type Pparb/dfl/fl littermates (Supplementary Figure 1G, I–J & L-M). Thus, regardless of the oncogenic stimuli, either with AOM/DSS, APCmin or combined, our results indicate that reduced PPARβ/δ expression in fibroblasts delays CRC development.
Fibroblast PPARβ/δ alters NRF2-mediated response in FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− intestinal epithelium
To gain mechanistic insight into how PPARβ/δ expression in fibroblasts mediates changes in its adjacent epithelial cells, we performed a comparative gene expression analysis of epithelial and mucosal layers from normal intestines and tumors from FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− and APCmin/+FSPCre-Pparb/d−/−. Ingenuity pathway analyses revealed that genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial dysfunction were enriched in FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice (Fig. 3a–c). Interestingly, our upstream regulator analyses of normal tumor adjacent and tumor epithelia revealed enhanced NRF2-mediated stress responses owing to the deletion of fibroblast PPARβ/δ (Fig. 3d, e). NRF2 is a master regulator of antioxidant responses through binding to the antioxidant response elements in the gene’s promoter region. It upregulates the expression of numerous antioxidant proteins to protect the cell from oxidative damages [34]. Available experimental evidence also clearly indicates that NRF2 is an important player in the maintenance of mitochondrial homeostasis and structural integrity (Holmstrom, Kostov et al. 2016). This role becomes particularly critical under conditions of oxidative, electrophilic, and inflammatory stress which influences the overall health and survival of the organism. The loss of NRF2 in mouse has been associated with increased susceptibility to CRC development [35], underscoring NRF2 as a potential chemopreventive target [36]. PPARs have been implicated as one of the downstream mediators of NRF2 [37]. For example, functional PPAR response element has been identified in the glutathione S-transferase [38, 39], glutathione peroxidase 1, and catalase genes [8]. PPARβ/δ has also been shown to exert antioxidant effect on cardiomyocytes by inhibiting PI3K/Akt signaling pathway to suppress ROS generation induced by AngII, however very little is known about its role in redox regulation in the gut [40–42]. Therefore, we winnowed our attention on NRF2 and associated antioxidant genes in the colon of FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice.
We observed an increase in NRF2 expression, concomitant with elevated expression of antioxidant enzymes in intact FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− colons (Fig. 3f). We also found higher expression of antioxidant (e.g., glutathione peroxidase and catalase) genes in the FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− compared with Pparb/dfl/fl intestines (Fig. 3g). This was supported by increased NRF2 staining in the intestinal villi, as well as increased nuclear NRF2 protein in FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− colons (Fig. 3h–i). Indeed, Therefore, our data provides evidence that NRF2 and its downstream oxidative stress signaling pathways were elevated in FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− colons and may be a major contributing factor for the reduced CRC in these mutant mice.
PPARβ/δ deficiency in fibroblasts lowers oxidative stress in HCT116, HT29, and iCEC cells
As shown earlier in the inflammatory model, FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− colons had a less-inflamed phenotype, with more anti-inflammatory cytokines and less-inflammatory cytokines, compared with their Pparβ/δfl/fl littermates. Inflammatory immune cells release a myriad cytokines, growth factors, and ROS to create an inflammatory microenvironment that is conducive for tumor development [43, 44]. Thus, we questioned if infiltrating immune cells could contribute to the difference in the tumor load between FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− and Pparb/dfl/fl mice. We did not observe differences in the number of CD11b+ immune cell numbers between two genotypes (Fig. 4a, b). Although the total number of infiltrating CD11b+ immune cells was similar, multiplex immunoassay analysis (Supplementary Table 1) suggested potential differences in the relative abundance of neutrophils, T-cells and macrophages between FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− and Pparb/dfl/fl colons. We did not find any significant difference in the number of infiltrating neutrophils (Ly6G+CD11b+) and T lymphocytes (CD3+CD11b+) between the FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− and Pparb/dfl/fl colons as determined by FACS analysis (Supplementary Fig. 2A & B). We noted that the vehicle-treated FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− colons have a higher infiltrated macrophage (F4/80+Cd11b+) than Pparb/dfl/fl, which was no longer distinguishable upon DSS stimulation (Supplementary Fig. 2C). Further characterization of macrophage subtypes revealed that vehicle-treated FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− colons have more of the anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages, but higher M1 macrophages upon DSS treatment (Supplementary Fig. 2D). The lower M1:M2 ratio in FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− colon was consistent with the reduced inflammatory cytokine landscape. Clinical and experimental evidence have indicated that inflammatory milieu and elevated ROS contribute to cancer initiation [45, 46]. ROS production is usually associated with the activation and functions of M1 rather than M2 macrophages. Together, they suggest that immune cells have minor role in tumor initiation of FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice.
Previous study reported that PPARβ/δ in wound fibroblasts transcriptionally regulates the expression of H2O2-detoxifying enzymes, glutathione peroxidase 1 and catalase, culminating in reduced ROS in the wound microenvironment [8]. Indeed, we detected elevated extracellular H2O2 in the conditioned medium of PPARβ/δ-deficient fibroblasts compared to their wild-type counterparts (Fig. 4c). No significant difference in intracellular H2O2 levels in the fibroblasts (Fig. 4d, e). Explanted FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− fibroblasts also have overall reduction in the expression antioxidant genes (8 of 12 genes), suggesting a more oxidative phenotype that contributed to the elevated H2O2 production and secretion into the microenvironment (Fig. 4f). Numerous studies have showed that the activation of cytoprotective NRF2-mediated stress responsive genes in response to elevated oxidative stress, like extracellular H2O2. Thus, to strengthen our observation that the novel epithelial–mesenchymal communication in oxidative stress homeostasis was dysregulated in FSPCre-Pparb/d−/−, as well as a direct effect of fibroblast PPARβ/δ on the oxidative status of adjacent epithelia, we measured ROS in two different human intestinal cancer cell lines (HCT116 and HT29) co-cultured with either PPARβ/δ-deficient fibroblasts or in conditioned media from FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− and Pparb/d−/− colonic fibroblasts (Fig. 4g–o). Consistent with our gene expression data, we detected higher expression of NRF2 and associated antioxidant enzymes in HCT116 and HT29 cultured in conditioned media from FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− than in PPARb/dfl/fl colonic fibroblasts (Fig. 4g, h). This is coupled with reduced ROS levels in HCT116 cells cultured in conditioned media from FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− colonic fibroblasts (Fig. 4i). In support, we also detected higher NRF2 expression, elevated mRNA levels of antioxidant enzymes and reduced ROS levels in HCT116 cells when co-cultured with siPPARβ/δ-knockdown BJ-1 fibroblasts (BJ-1siPPARβ/δ) (Fig. 4 j–l) or CCD18Co myofibroblasts (CCD18CosiPPARβ/δ) (Fig. 4m–o)compared with cognate controls (BJ-1siScrambled and CCDCosiScrambled). We similarly observed an NRF2 antioxidant response in immortalized non-tumorigenic human colon epithelial cells cultured in either conditioned media from FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− or the presence of exogenous H2O2 (Supplementary Figure 2 E-G). This response was attenuated in the presence of antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine (NAC). Chronic or repeated exposure to low level of H2O2, in combination with growth factors, has been shown to exert transformative and growth-promoting effects on epithelial cells [47]. We observed an increase in HCT116 cells at either G2/M or S phase when was co-cultured with PPARβ/δ-knockdown fibroblast cell lines compared with cognate controls (Supplementary Figure 2H).
Our findings suggest that an elevated NRF2-related response in the colon epithelia was associated with reduced CRC. Thus, we explore the effect of NAC pre-treatment on CRC initiation in DSS-treated APCmin/+Pparb/dfl/fl and APCmin/+FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice (NAC/DSS treatment). APCmin/+Pparb/dfl/fl mice developed more and larger CRCs than APCmin/+FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− (Supplementary Figure 1L-M). The pre-treatment with NAC reduced the number of tumors in APCmin/+Pparb/dfl/fl by 87% when compared no NAC pre-treatment (Supplementary Figure 1N-P), suggesting that ROS have an important role in early tumor development. There was no difference in the number of tumors between NAC pre-treated or untreated APCmin/+FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice (Supplementary 1L & O), suggesting that further reduction in epithelial ROS has minimal impact on tumor development. Paradoxically, we observed a reduced median survival rate of the APCmin/+FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice pre-treated with NAC (Fig. 1n). Although the precise reason for this observation is unclear, we speculate that additional reduction in epithelial ROS might have disrupted critical ROS-mediated cellular functions necessary for homeostasis in APCmin/+FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice, which already have elevated NRF2 antioxidant response. Studies from the past two decades have established that ROS serve as signaling molecules to regulate biological and physiological processes [48]. Clearly, future experiments will be necessary to understand the effect of antioxidant treatment on normal cellular functions in FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice, as well as the optimal antioxidant treatment regime to reduce CRC in wild-type mice.
We showed a major role for stromal PPARβ/δ in ROS production that consequently conjures an NRF2-mediated antioxidant response, reducing ROS levels in the adjacent intestinal epithelial cancer cells. NRF2-mediated response also results in the activation of various signaling pathways that facilitates tumor cell senescence [49, 50]. Collectively, we propose that FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− colonic epithelium are subjected to a constant dose of ROS, extracellular H2O2 from their neighboring stroma, which triggers NRF2-mediated signaling that suppresses tumor development.
Conclusion
Our data have shown that PPARβ/δ ablation in fibroblasts results in reduced tumorigenesis across three different mice models of CRC. Microarray gene expression and gene ontology analyses, together with in vivo and in vitro experiments indicate that PPARβ/δ depletion in fibroblasts alters the antioxidant responses and thus the oxidative status of the adjacent epithelium. We propose that PPARβ/δ deficiency in fibroblasts increases extracellular H2O2, triggering an NRF2-mediated antioxidant response in the adjacent epithelia. The elevated expression of NRF2-dependent proteins is critical for eliminating carcinogens to maintain cellular redox homeostasis. Consequently, FSPCre-Pparb/d−/− mice have reduced colonic polyp formation.
Nuclear receptor PPARβ/δ has been implicated in CRC, although it remained controversial as studies have shown supporting evidence for PPARβ/δ playing an anti-tumorigenic [16] and pro-tumorigenic roles in CRC [51]. It is conceivable that PPARβ/δ has dual roles in tumorigenesis, much like TGF-β1 and ROS. By regulating cell growth, death, and immortalization, TGFβ signaling pathways exert tumor suppressor effects in normal cells and early carcinomas. But as tumors progress, these protective and cytostatic effects of TGFβ are often lost, switching to promote cancer progression, invasion, and tumor metastasis. Similarly, chronic oxidative stress has been shown to promote tumorigenesis [47, 52], whereas the modulation of oxidative stress as an anticancer therapeutic agent has also been discussed [53]. With the temporal and dose-dependent basis of oxidative stress on tumor formation and development, this may explain the dual effect of PPARβ/δ on tumorigenesis.
Limitations of our study include that one genetic background of mouse and our deletion strategy consists of the deletion of exons coding for the DNA-binding domain of PPARβ/δ. Different mouse strains may exhibit different susceptibility to carcinogen or tolerance to oxidative stress. It is also conceivable that other gene deletion strategies may result in different phenotypic severity or outcomes owing to differences in vulnerabilities to the oxidative stress. FSP1 is a key marker of a specific subset of macrophages in the liver during fibrosis and injury [54], although no report has described confounding issues in other organs. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the role of fibroblast PPARβ/δ in CRC, which reveals novel epithelial–mesenchymal communication in ROS homeostasis. Our results illustrate that PPARβ/δ modulation of oxidative stress has potential medical applicability.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
EHPT and JSKC are recipients of the Nanyang President Graduate Scholarship; MKS is a recipient of the Research Scholarship of the NTU, Singapore. We wish to thank Pierre Chambon and Daniel Metzger for their help in generating the floxed PPARβ/δ mice. The authors also acknowledge Dr. Han Chung Chong and Ming Jie Tan of Denova Sciences Pte Ltd for assistance in microarray experiments and analysis.
Funding
This work was supported by Singapore Ministry of Education under Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 2 (MOE2014-T2-1-012) and Academic Research Fund Tier 1 (RG134/15) to NST, and by the Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Start-up Grant to WW.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Contributor Information
Eddie Han Pin Tan, Email: HTAN024@e.ntu.edu.sg.
Nguan Soon Tan, Phone: +65 6316 2941, Email: nstan@ntu.edu.sg.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1038/s41388-017-0109-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
- 1.Quail DF, Joyce JA. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med. 2013;19:1423–37. doi: 10.1038/nm.3394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Udagawa T, Wood M. Tumor-stromal cell interactions and opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2010;10:369–74. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2010.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Holmstrom KM, Finkel T. Cellular mechanisms and physiological consequences of redox-dependent signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:411–21. doi: 10.1038/nrm3801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Manda G, Isvoranu G, Comanescu MV, Manea A, Debelec Butuner B, Korkmaz KS. The redox biology network in cancer pathophysiology and therapeutics. Redox Biol. 2015;5:347–57. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chaiswing L, Oberley TD. Extracellular/microenvironmental redox state. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2010;13:449–65. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.3020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Espinosa-Diez C, Miguel V, Mennerich D, Kietzmann T, Sanchez-Perez P, Cadenas S, et al. Antioxidant responses and cellular adjustments to oxidative stress. Redox Biol. 2015;6:183–97. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Panieri E, Santoro MM. ROS homeostasis and metabolism: a dangerous liason in cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2253. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang X, Sng MK, Foo S, Chong HC, Lee WL, Tang MB, et al. Early controlled release of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta agonist GW501516 improves diabetic wound healing through redox modulation of wound microenvironment. J Control Release. 2015;197:138–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Peters JM, Gonzalez FJ, Muller R. Establishing the role of PPARbeta/delta in carcinogenesis. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2015;26:595–607. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2015.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tan NS, Vazquez-Carrera M, Montagner A, Sng MK, Guillou H, Wahli W. Transcriptional control of physiological and pathological processes by the nuclear receptor PPARbeta/delta. Prog Lipid Res. 2016;64:98–122. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2016.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.He TC, Chan TA, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. PPARdelta is an APC-regulated target of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cell. 1999;99:335–45. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81664-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Montagner A, Delgado MB, Tallichet-Blanc C, Chan JS, Sng MK, Mottaz H, et al. Src is activated by the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta in ultraviolet radiation-induced skin cancer. EMBO Mol Med. 2014;6:80–98. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201302666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang W, Xu Y, Xu Q, Shi H, Shi J, Hou Y. PPARdelta promotes tumor progression via activation of Glut1 and SLC1-A5 transcription. Carcinogenesis. 2017;38:748–55. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgx035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Marin HE, Peraza MA, Billin AN, Willson TM, Ward JM, Kennett MJ, et al. Ligand activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta inhibits colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2006;66:4394–401. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang D, Wang H, Guo Y, Ning W, Katkuri S, Wahli W, et al. Crosstalk between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta and VEGF stimulates cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:19069–74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607948103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang D, Fu L, Ning W, Guo L, Sun X, Dey SK, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta promotes colonic inflammation and tumor growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:7084–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324233111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kilgore KS, Billin AN. PPARbeta/delta ligands as modulators of the inflammatory response. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2008;9:463–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Borland MG, Yao PL, Kehres EM, Lee C, Pritzlaff AM, Ola E, et al. Editor’s highlight: PPARbeta/delta and PPARgamma inhibit melanoma tumorigenicity by modulating inflammation and apoptosis. Toxicol Sci. 2017;159:436–48. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zuo X, Peng Z, Moussalli MJ, Morris JS, Broaddus RR, Fischer SM, et al. Targeted genetic disruption of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta and colonic tumorigenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:762–7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zuo X, Xu M, Yu J, Wu Y, Moussalli MJ, Manyam GC, et al. Potentiation of colon cancer susceptibility in mice by colonic epithelial PPAR-delta/beta overexpression. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:dju052. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chan J S K, Sng M K, Teo Z Q, Chong H C, Twang J S, Tan N S. Targeting nuclear receptors in cancer-associated fibroblasts as concurrent therapy to inhibit development of chemoresistant tumors. Oncogene. 2017;37(2):160–173. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pinchuk IV, Mifflin RC, Saada JI, Powell DW. Intestinal mesenchymal cells. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2010;12:310–8. doi: 10.1007/s11894-010-0135-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Okada H, Inoue T, Kanno Y, Kobayashi T, Watanabe Y, Ban S, et al. Selective depletion of fibroblasts preserves morphology and the functional integrity of peritoneum in transgenic mice with peritoneal fibrosing syndrome. Kidney Int. 2003;64:1722–32. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00290.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Strutz F, Okada H, Lo CW, Danoff T, Carone RL, Tomaszewski JE, et al. Identification and characterization of a fibroblast marker: FSP1. J Cell Biol. 1995;130:393–405. doi: 10.1083/jcb.130.2.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bhowmick NA, Chytil A, Plieth D, Gorska AE, Dumont N, Shappell S, et al. TGF-beta signaling in fibroblasts modulates the oncogenic potential of adjacent epithelia. Science. 2004;303:848–51. doi: 10.1126/science.1090922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu X, Pitarresi JR, Cuitino MC, Kladney RD, Woelke SA, Sizemore GM, et al. Genetic ablation of Smoothened in pancreatic fibroblasts increases acinar-ductal metaplasia. Genes Dev. 2016;30:1943–55. doi: 10.1101/gad.283499.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pickup MW, Hover LD, Polikowsky ER, Chytil A, Gorska AE, Novitskiy SV, et al. BMPR2 loss in fibroblasts promotes mammary carcinoma metastasis via increased inflammation. Mol Oncol. 2015;9:179–91. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yu S, Yeh CR, Niu Y, Chang HC, Tsai YC, Moses HL, et al. Altered prostate epithelial development in mice lacking the androgen receptor in stromal fibroblasts. Prostate. 2012;72:437–49. doi: 10.1002/pros.21445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Iglesias J, Barg S, Vallois D, Lahiri S, Roger C, Yessoufou A, et al. PPARbeta/delta affects pancreatic beta cell mass and insulin secretion in mice. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:4105–17. doi: 10.1172/JCI42127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Trimboli AJ, Fukino K, de Bruin A, Wei G, Shen L, Tanner SM, et al. Direct evidence for epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68:937–45. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Roncoroni L, Elli L, Doneda L, Piodi L, Ciulla MM, Paliotti R, et al. Isolation and culture of fibroblasts from endoscopic duodenal biopsies of celiac patients. J Transl Med. 2009;7:40. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-7-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jess T, Rungoe C, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Risk of colorectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:639–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kim ER, Chang DK. Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: the risk, pathogenesis, prevention and diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:9872–81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sporn MB, Liby KT. NRF2 and cancer: the good, the bad and the importance of context. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:564–71. doi: 10.1038/nrc3278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Khor TO, Huang MT, Prawan A, Liu Y, Hao X, Yu S, et al. Increased susceptibility of Nrf2 knockout mice to colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2008;1:187–91. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Saw CL, Kong AN. Nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 as a chemopreventive target in colorectal cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2011;15:281–95. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2011.553602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Reddy RC, Standiford TJNrf2. and PPAR{gamma}: PPARtnering against oxidant-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:134–5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201004-0457ED. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cho HY, Gladwell W, Wang X, Chorley B, Bell D, Reddy SP, et al. Nrf2-regulated PPAR{gamma} expression is critical to protection against acute lung injury in mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:170–82. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200907-1047OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Park EY, Cho IJ, Kim SG. Transactivation of the PPAR-responsive enhancer module in chemopreventive glutathione S-transferase gene by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma and retinoid X receptor heterodimer. Cancer Res. 2004;64:3701–13. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kim HJ, Ham SA, Kim MY, Hwang JS, Lee H, Kang ES, et al. PPARdelta coordinates angiotensin II-induced senescence in vascular smooth muscle cells through PTEN-mediated inhibition of superoxide generation. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:44585–93. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.222562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kim MY, Kang ES, Ham SA, Hwang JS, Yoo TS, Lee H, et al. The PPARdelta-mediated inhibition of angiotensin II-induced premature senescence in human endothelial cells is SIRT1-dependent. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;84:1627–34. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2012.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu J, Wang P, He L, Li Y, Luo J, Cheng L, et al. Cardiomyocyte-restricted deletion of PPARbeta/delta in PPARalpha-null mice causes impaired mitochondrial biogenesis and defense, but no further depression of myocardial fatty acid oxidation. PPAR Res. 2011;2011:372854. doi: 10.1155/2011/372854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Elinav E, Nowarski R, Thaiss CA, Hu B, Jin C, Flavell RA. Inflammation-induced cancer: crosstalk between tumours, immune cells and microorganisms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:759–71. doi: 10.1038/nrc3611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gajewski TF, Schreiber H, Fu YX. Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:1014–22. doi: 10.1038/ni.2703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Liou GY, Storz P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic Res. 2010;44:479–96. doi: 10.3109/10715761003667554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shalapour S, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer: an eternal fight between good and evil. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:3347–55. doi: 10.1172/JCI80007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chan JS, Tan MJ, Sng MK, Teo Z, Phua T, Choo CC, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts enact field cancerization by promoting extratumoral oxidative stress. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2562. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Finkel T. Signal transduction by reactive oxygen species. J Cell Biol. 2011;194:7–15. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201102095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cairns RA, Harris IS, Mak TW. Regulation of cancer cell metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:85–95. doi: 10.1038/nrc2981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ramsey MR, Sharpless NE. ROS as a tumour suppressor? Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:1213–5. doi: 10.1038/ncb1106-1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Harman FS, Nicol CJ, Marin HE, Ward JM, Gonzalez FJ, Peters JM. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta attenuates colon carcinogenesis. Nat Med. 2004;10:481–3. doi: 10.1038/nm1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Khansari N, Shakiba Y, Mahmoudi M. Chronic inflammation and oxidative stress as a major cause of age-related diseases and cancer. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2009;3:73–80. doi: 10.2174/187221309787158371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gorrini C, Harris IS, Mak TW. Modulation of oxidative stress as an anticancer strategy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12:931–47. doi: 10.1038/nrd4002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Osterreicher CH, Penz-Osterreicher M, Grivennikov SI, Guma M, Koltsova EK, Datz C, et al. Fibroblast-specific protein 1 identifies an inflammatory subpopulation of macrophages in the liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:308–13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017547108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.