Skip to main content
Nicotine & Tobacco Research logoLink to Nicotine & Tobacco Research
letter
. 2016 Oct 25;19(4):493–494. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw275

Association of TAS2R38 Haplotypes and Menthol Cigarette Preference in an African American Cohort

Davide Risso 1,2, Eduardo Sainz 1, Joanne Gutierrez 1, Thomas Kirchner 3, Raymond Niaura 4, Dennis Drayna 1,
PMCID: PMC5896488  PMID: 27733510

In a recent publication in Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Oncken et al.1 examined 323 pregnant female Caucasian cigarette smokers, including menthol and nonmenthol users, and genotyped three TAS2R38 bitter taste receptor gene polymorphisms (rs713598, rs1726866, and rs10246939). These polymorphisms specify whether an individual is a taster (associated with the PAV haplotype) or a nontaster (associated with the AVI haplotype) for a variety of bitter compounds, including the well-known phenylthiocarbamide and propylthiouracil.2–3 The rationale behind this study was to test whether variations in the well-studied TAS2R38 bitter taste receptor gene could contribute to the preference of smokers for menthol cigarettes, because menthol could mask the bitter taste of nicotine or other components of cigarette smoke. Oncken et al. reported the frequency of the PAV taster haplotype to be greater in menthol smokers than in nonmenthol smokers in both non-Hispanic (54% vs. 30%, respectively, p < 0.001) and Hispanic (53% vs. 25%, respectively, p = 0.016) women, confirming this initial hypothesis.

While this research reported an intriguing association between variations in a bitter taste receptor gene and preference for menthol cigarettes, the authors pointed out a number of weaknesses in their study, including the relatively small sample size and the fact that they only studied pregnant Caucasian women. The authors noted that it was not clear if these results generalize to other ethnicities, nonpregnant women or men. In addition, genotype–phenotype association studies typically require replication in an independent group in order to exclude any potential confounding population stratification and increase the confidence in the findings.4 Moreover, focusing the attention on Caucasian individuals precludes the possibility of studying rarer alleles and haplotypes, since individuals of African descent carry greater levels of genetic diversity and more polymorphic sites when compared to non-African populations.5 This is of particular importance when studying menthol cigarette smoking, since an average of 80% of adult African Americans are menthol smokers, while only 25–35% of Caucasian and Hispanic smokers use menthol.6

In order to overcome these limitations, we recruited 718 African Americans smokers (236 females and 482 males) in the Washington DC area with written informed consent under protocols reviewed and approved by the National Institutes of Health Combined Neurosciences IRB and the Western IRB (National Institutes of Health protocol 01-DC-0230). All procedures were performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. The average age of these individuals was 45.1 (SD = 10.8) and 406 (56.5%) of them were menthol smokers, with the remaining 312 (43.5%) being nonmenthol smokers. A higher percentage of menthol than nonmenthol smokers were female (39.6% vs. 24.2%, p = 0.001), in agreement with previously reported data.6 No differences were found in the mean age of menthol smokers (45.4, SD = 11.0) and nonmenthol smokers (44.6, SD = 10.6; p = 0.372). We collected saliva samples from all participants using Oragene saliva collection kits (Genotek Inc, Kanata, ON, Canada) and we purified genomic DNA following the manufacturer’s protocol. A dedicated set of primers was designed to completely sequence the single coding exon of the TAS2R38 gene using dideoxy Sanger sequencing, as previously published.7 We constructed and calculated the frequencies of the taster PAV (45.47%), nontaster AVI (33.22%), and the rarer AAI (17.90%), AAV (2.37%), PVI (0.76%), and PAI (0.28%) haplotypes, and we examined associations between their frequency and menthol cigarette preference in the group. The nontaster AVI haplotype was inversely associated with menthol cigarette smoking, even after correction for sociodemographic factors (such as age, gender, marital status, and education level) and multiple testing correction, implemented in a logistic regression model. The frequency of this haplotype was significantly lower in menthol smokers (29.8%) compared to nonmenthol smokers [37.7%; odds ratio (OR) = 0.70, p = 0.008]. This association was replicated in both female (OR = 0.89, p = 0.01) and male (OR = 0.72, p = 0.02) individuals and showed a gene dosage effect with 62.3%, 53.8%, and 44.0% of menthol users carrying zero, one, or two copies of this haplotype, respectively. Conversely, the taster PAV haplotype was higher in menthol smokers (48.2%), compared to nonmenthol smokers (42.1%; OR = 1.24, p = 0.04). The fact that the association between the PAV haplotype and menthol smoking was not as strong as previously found1 could be due to the relatively greater number of intermediate sensitivity haplotypes (AAI, AAV, PVI, and PAI haplotypes) in our subject sample that did not show a significant difference in frequency between menthol and nonmenthol smokers (all p’s > 0.1). In addition, since our population displayed a high prevalence of African-derived haplotypes, there was not a strong and complementary relation between the common nontaster AVI and taster PAV haplotypes (r = −0. 64), in comparison to the one previously shown in Caucasians1 (r = −0.87). Lastly, when performing a meta-analysis including the results of both the present study and of Oncken et al.,1 the association between TAS2R38 PAV haplotype and menthol cigarette smoking was still significant (p = 0.025, using a random effects model) resulting in a common OR of 1.78 (95% confidence interval = 1.07 to 2.94; Fig.1), with some evidence (p = 0.019) of expected heterogeneity, considering the differences in subject characteristics.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Forest plot illustrating the odds ratios and confidence intervals of the TAS2R38 PAV haplotype association with menthol cigarette smoking in both African American and Caucasian individuals.

Our results confirm the previous work by Oncken et al.,1 stressing the validity and importance of their findings which we have now extended to men and to different ethnic groups. Together, these data suggest that genetic variations that modify the ability of tasting bitter compounds could explain the observed differences and preference toward mentholated tobacco use. This is of particular importance, considering the fact that the potential risks associated with adding menthol to cigarettes have been a subject of considerable recent study by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)8 and risks to specific racial and ethnic minorities, such as African Americans and Hispanics have been raised in this context.9

Funding

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NIDCD (grant numbers Z1A-000046-15 and Z1C-000086), by NIH, Office of the Director and the National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant RC1-DA028710, and by the FDA through funds obtained under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. The content was not reviewed by the Food and Drug Administration, but underwent the standard manuscript clearance process for scientific papers published from the NIH intramural research program.

Declaration of Interests

None declared.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Carter VanWaes and Thomas Friedman for helpful comments and Julia Kozlitina for critical revision of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Oncken C, Feinn R, Covault J, et al. Genetic vulnerability to menthol cigarette preference in women. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(12):1416–1420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kim UK, Jorgenson E, Coon H, Leppert M, Risch N, Drayna D. Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science. 2003;299(5610):1221–1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Harris H, Kalmus H. Chemical specificity in genetical differences of taste sensitivity. Ann Eugen. 1949;15(1):32–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. NCI-NHGRI Working Group on Replication in Association Studies ; Chanock SJ, Manolio T, Boehnke M, et al. Replicating genotype-phenotype associations. Nature. 2007;447(7145):655–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Campbell MC, Tishkoff SA. African genetic diversity: implications for human demographic history, modern human origins, and complex disease mapping. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2008;9:403–433. doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Caraballo RS, Asman K. Epidemiology of menthol cigarette use in the United States. Tob Induc Dis. 2011;9(suppl 1):S1. doi:10.1186/1617-9625-9-S1-S1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Risso DS, Howard L, VanWaes C, Drayna D. A potential trigger for pine mouth: a case of a homozygous PTC taster. Nutr Res. 2015; 35(12):1122–1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Food and Drug Administration. Preliminary Scientific Evaluation of the Possible Public Health Effects of Menthol Versus Nonmenthol Cigarettes 2013. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/UCM361598.pdf Accessed September 16, 2016.
  • 9. Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee. Menthol Cigarettes and Public Health: Review of the Scientific Evidence and Recommendations. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug administration; 2011. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/advisorycommittees/committeesmeetingmaterials/tobaccoproductsscientificadvisorycommittee/ucm269697.pdf Accessed September 16, 2016. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nicotine & Tobacco Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES