Combining Intra-Tumoral Treg Depletion with Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT): Pre-Clinical Activity in the Myc-CaP Model

Ying-Chun Shen; Ali Ghasemzadeh; Christina M Kochel; Thomas R Nirschl; Brian J Francica; Zoila A Lopez-Bujanda; Maria A Carrera Haro; Ada Tam; Robert A Anders; Mark J Selby; Alan J Korman; Charles G Drake

doi:10.1038/s41391-017-0013-x

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 4.

Published in final edited form as: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Dec 4;21(1):113–125. doi: 10.1038/s41391-017-0013-x

Combining Intra-Tumoral Treg Depletion with Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT): Pre-Clinical Activity in the Myc-CaP Model

Ying-Chun Shen ^1,^2,¹¹, Ali Ghasemzadeh ^1,^3,^4,⁵, Christina M Kochel ^1,¹², Thomas R Nirschl ^2,³, Brian J Francica ^1,⁶, Zoila A Lopez-Bujanda ^1,^3,^5,⁷, Maria A Carrera Haro ^1,^3,⁵, Ada Tam ^1,³, Robert A Anders ⁷, Mark J Selby ⁸, Alan J Korman ⁸, Charles G Drake ^1,^5,^9,¹⁰

PMCID: PMC5897134 NIHMSID: NIHMS910067 PMID: 29203894

Abstract

Introduction

Immune checkpoint blockade has shown promising anti-tumor activity against a variety of tumor types. However, responses in castration-resistant prostate cancer remain relatively rare - potentially due to low baseline levels of infiltration. Using an immunocompetent cMyc-driven model (Myc-CaP), we sought to understand the immune infiltrate induced by androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and to leverage that infiltration toward therapeutic benefit.

Methods

Using flow cytometry, qPCR and IHC we quantified ADT-induced immune infiltration in terms of cell type and function. Preclinical treatment studies tested the combinatorial effects of ADT and immune checkpoint blockade using tumor outgrowth and overall survival as endpoints.

Results

Androgen deprivation therapy induces a complex pro-inflammatory infiltrate. This pro-inflammatory infiltrate was apparent in the early post-castration period but diminished as castration resistance emerged. Combining androgen deprivation therapy with tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cell (Treg) depletion using a depleting anti-CTLA-4 antibody significantly delayed the development of castration resistance and prolonged survival of a fraction of tumor-bearing mice. Immunotherapy as a monotherapy failed to provide a survival benefit, and was ineffective if not administered in the peri-castration period.

Conclusions

The immune infiltrate induced by ADT is diverse and varies over time. Therapeutic strategies focusing on depleting Tregs in the peri-castration period are of particular interest.

Keywords: androgen deprivation therapy, castration-resistant prostate cancer, immune checkpoint, PD-1, CTLA-4, regulatory T cells, Treg, FoxP3

Introduction

Immune checkpoint blockade, which amplifies host immunity to eradicate cancer cells, has emerged as a paradigm-shifting cancer treatment (1). Blockade of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) results in durable tumor regression in a proportion of patients with a variety of treatment refractory cancers as well as in some patients with treatment-naïve tumors (2). Prostate cancer has proved more challenging than other tumor types; despite promising early results (3), CTLA-4 blockade failed to show efficacy in two randomized Phase III trials (4, 5). Further, the first Phase Ib trial of an anti-PD-1 antibody included 17 late-stage prostate cancer patients with no objective responses noted (6). More recently, objective responses have been reported when anti-PD-1 was added to patients progressing on the second generation anti-androgen enzalutamide (7), suggesting that a subset of prostate cancer patients may indeed respond to PD-1 blockade.

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer (8, 9). In addition to its pro-apoptotic effects on cancer cells (10), androgen deprivation therapy results in immune infiltration into the prostate gland (11, 12). This infiltrate is complex, and includes potential anti-tumor effector cells such as CD8 T cells as well as CD68+ macrophages (12). Conversely, infiltrating B cells may serve to promote castration resistance (13). Previously, we found that castration results in the de-novo presentation of a prostate-restricted antigen in the tumor draining lymph nodes and that the initial pro-inflammatory effects of ADT were sufficient to transiently mitigate T cell tolerance (14).

Tregs are an especially interesting feature of intra-prostatic inflammation (15). We have found that transient depletion of tumor-infiltrating Tregs by low-dose cyclophosphamide augmented an anti-tumor vaccine response against prostate cancer in mice (16). In patients, a high level of tumor-infiltrating Tregs has been associated with shorter disease-free survival in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy(17). Taken together, these data suggest that the pro-inflammatory effects of ADT may be counterbalanced by pro-tumorigenic Tregs.

Pre-clinical studies on the effects of Treg on anti-tumor immunity induced by ADT have been hampered by the lack of an effective Treg depleting reagent. To address that issue, we used an anti-CTLA-4 antibody of the mouse IgG2a isotype, which selectively depletes intratumoral Tregs based on their relatively elevated expression of CTLA-4 (18). For an animal model, we used the castration-sensitive Myc-CaP model developed by the Sawyers group; these tumor cells initially respond to ADT, but subsequently develop androgen-independence, modeling castration-resistant prostate cancer progression in humans(19). We found that Treg depletion in the peri-castration period significantly altered the immunological composition of prostate tumor microenvironment, and resulted in prolonged survival in a subset of animals. Treg depletion without ADT was ineffective, as was Treg depletion in more advanced settings.

Materials and Methods

Mice

Six to eight week-old male FVB/NJ mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME), and housed in a specific pathogen-free facility at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Sample group sizes were selected based on extensive experience with these models. After tumors were established, animals were randomly assigned to treatment groups in all experiments. Investigators were not blinded to the groups during the experiments. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Cell line

Myc-CaP cells, derived from spontaneous prostate cancer in c-Myc transgenic mice, were a generous gift from Dr. Charles Sawyers and were maintained as previously described (19). Cells were tested to be free of mycoplasma contamination.

Animal model

Eight to ten week-old male FVB/NJ mice were subcutaneously inoculated with Myc-Cap cells (1×10⁶ cells/mouse) in the right flank as previously described (13). Tumor diameters were measured with an electronic caliper every 2 - 3 days as indicated. Tumor volumes were calculated using the formula: 0.5 × longest diameter × (shortest diameter)². When tumor volumes reached approximately 400 mm³, mice were randomly allocated to treatment groups as indicated. Euthanasia was performed for tumor ulceration, tumor diameter > 2 cm, or tumor volume > 1500 mm³. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time period between castration and death.

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)

Androgen deprivation therapy was delivered via bilateral orchiectomy or subcutaneous (sc) injection of degarelix acetate (a GnRH receptor antagonist; Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc., Parsippany, NJ) at a dosage of 0.625 mg in 100 μl vehicle every 30 days.

Immune checkpoint blockade

Anti-PD-1 (murine IgG1, clone 4H2) (20), anti-CTLA-4 non-depleting (ND; murine IgG1-D265A; a non-FcγR binding mutant with deficient FcγR-mediated depletion) and anti-CTLA-4 depleting (D; murine IgG2a; with competent FcγR-mediated depletion) (21). Antibody treatment was administered via intra-peritoneal (ip) injection at a dose of 10 mg/kg body weight every 3 days for a total of 3 doses. Mouse IgG2a (clone: C1.18.4; BioXCell, West Lebanon, NH) was used as an isotype control.

Quantification of serum testosterone

Whole blood was collected from the tail vein, and allowed to clot × 1 hour at 4°C. Serum was obtained by centrifuging (1000×g for 30 min) and collecting the supernatant. Sera were stored at -80°C prior to analysis. Testosterone concentration was determined by ELISA according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Enzo, Farmingdale, NY).

Quantitative RT-PCR

Subcutaneous Myc-CaP tumors were harvested and digested with collagenase I and trypsin (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA). Total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Ambion, Carlsbad, CA). cDNA was prepared from total RNA using the RNA to cDNA EcoDry Premix (Clontech, Mountain View, CA). Real-time assays were conducted using TaqMan real-time probes (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). All samples were run in triplicate. The ΔΔ CT method was used to quantify relative mRNA expression. Expression of each target gene was normalized to that of a reference gene (18s or GAPDH).

Immunohistochemical staining

Subcutaneous Myc-CaP tumors were fixed with 10% formalin (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for 3 days before paraffin embedding and sectioning. Five-μm sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H/E), and anti-mouse CD3 (SP7; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Images were reviewed and interpreted by an experienced pathologist blinded to treatment arm (RAA).

Flow cytometry

Single-cell suspensions were prepared from dissected Myc-CaP tumors. Cells were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA; BioLegend, San Diego, CA; eBiosciences, San Diego, CA) and analyzed using a LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA). LIVE/DEAD aqua kits (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) or Fixable Viability Dye (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA) were used to exclude dead cells from analyses. The CTLA-4-positive population was assayed by both surface and intracellular staining. For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized using fixation/permeabilization concentrate and diluent (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA) at room temperature for 30 minutes (60 minutes for FoxP3 staining). For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were stimulated for 4 hours in the presence of protein transport inhibitor cocktail (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA). Gates were set using matched isotype controls. For staining of cytokines and immune checkpoint molecules/ligands, cells were stimulated with CD3/CD28 beads (Life Technologies, Oslo, Norway) for 3 days or PMA (50 ng/ml)/ionomycin (500 ng/ml) for 4 hours. As a positive control for cytokine expression, ova-specific splenocytes (OT-1) were stimulated with OVA peptide (5 ng/ml) for 3 days; naïve splenocytes were used as negative control. Data analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Ashland, OR).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 6 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA). Unpaired two-tailed t-tests or log-rank tests (for survival studies) were conducted and considered statistically significant at P-values ≤0.05 (*), 0.01 (**), 0.001 (***) and 0.0001 (****).

Results

Inflammation in the Myc-CaP Model of Castration Sensitivity and Resistance

Because orchiectomy is an invasive procedure that might affect both local and systemic immunity, we tested whether the GnRH antagonist degarelix acetate could be used as an accurate model of castration in mice. Both orchiectomy and degarelix resulted in similar levels of testosterone on days 7 and 30 post-treatment (Supplemental Figure 1). This similarity was reflected in a treatment setting, both degarelix and orchiectomy induced initial regression of established Myc-CaP tumors, followed by the emergence of castration-resistant disease (Figure 1A). The emergence of castration-resistance was defined as tumors that regressed post-ADT (androgen deprivation therapy) and subsequently grew again to a minimum volume of 420 mm³. Having established the similarity in degarelix and orchiectomy in reducing testosterone levels, we carried out the remainder of experiments using degarelix. We next tested whether ADT affected the expression of prostate-associated transcripts; as shown in Figure 1B, message RNA-level expression of androgen receptor, Folh1 (a prostate specific membrane antigen analog), and Acpp (prostatic acid phosphatase) were increased post-castration. Psca (Prostate stem cell antigen) expression was not significantly altered pre and post-castration. Histologically, inflammation was apparent on day 7 after castration, but was relatively sparse in pre-castration or castration-resistant tumors (Figure 1C). Taken together, these results show that the subcutaneous Myc-CaP tumor model shares common characteristics with human prostate cancer progression and has some evidence of immune infiltration early after castration.

Eight-week old male FVB/NJ mice were inoculated with 1 × 10⁶ cells Myc-CaP cells in the right flank; when mean tumor volume reached 420 mm³, mice were randomly to treatment groups as shown (n=8 per group, repeated × 3).

(A) Tumor growth curves - representative of at least 3 independent experiments. Vertical dashed line indicates time at which castration or control treatment was performed.

(B) qPCR for selected androgen-associated transcripts; all data normalized to the pre-castration (Pre-C) group. Fold change calculated by ΔΔCt, normalized to pre-castration counts (Pre-C). Reactions performed in triplicate, repeated × 2.

(C) Representative H&E sections of indicated tumors, magnification as shown.

Data are mean ± SEM. P-values determined by unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney test. *, P <0.05; **, P <0.01; NS, not statistically significant.

ADT Induces a Complex Immune Infiltrate

To understand the composition of the immune infiltrate post-castration, we used qPCR to evaluate expression of cell-type markers, cytokines, transcription factors, immune checkpoint molecules and ligands. We found that expression of Ptprc (CD45), CD4, CD8a, Ncam1 (CD56; a natural killer cell marker), Adgre 1 (F4/80; a macrophage marker), Ifng (interferon gamma, IFN-γ), tnf (tissue necrosis factor-α; TNF-α), Tgfb1 (transforming growth factor-β1; TGF-β1), Il10 (interleukin-10; IL-10), Il6 (interleukin-6; IL-6), Tbx21 (Tbet), Gata3, Rorc (ROR-γ), Eomes and FoxP3 were all significantly increased on day 7 post-castration (Figure 2). Interestingly, many of these markers subsequently decreased to pre-castration levels with the development of castration resistance. Neither Il4 (IL-4) nor Il17 (IL-17) transcripts were detectable in Myc-CaP tumors (data not shown). These data suggest that castration increases tumor-infiltrating immune cells of various subsets including CD4, CD8 and regulatory T cells as well as natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages. The expression of the T cell checkpoint molecule programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligands (PD-L1 and PD-L2), cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) and T cell immunoglobulin mucin-3 (TIM-3) were also significantly increased on day 7 post-castration, but decreased in castration-resistant tumors. Taken together these data reveal a complex, generally pro-inflammatory infiltrate early after castration, and show that inflammation appears to partially resolve as castration resistance emerges.

Bulk tumor samples from animals treated as in Figure 1 analyzed by qPCR using indicated probe sets. Fold change calculated by ΔΔCt, normalized to Pre-C. Reactions performed in triplicate, repeated × 2.

(A) Transcripts associated with immune cell subsets

(B) Cytokines

(C) Immunologically relevant transcription factors

(D) Immune checkpoints and ligands

Data are mean ± SEM. P-values determined by unpaired t test, *, P <0.05; **, P <0.01; NS, not statistically significant.

The Immune Tumor Microenvironment (TME) Evolves as Castration Resistance Emerges

To expand on those message RNA-level data, we used flow cytometry to determine the relative contribution of various immune cell types to the total CD45+ (bone marrow-derived) population. Intratumoral CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, Treg, B cells, NK cells, dendritic cells (DC), and macrophages (MAC) were quantified as shown in Supplemental Figure 2. Similar to the qPCR results, these data showed dynamic changes in immune cell subsets over time. For example, the percentage of NK cells (CD3-, CD49b+) was significantly increased on day 7 after castration, and then significantly decreased as castration resistance emerged (Figure 3A). The percentage of macrophages (CD11b+, F4/80+) was significantly increased on day 7 after castration, and continued to increase as castration resistance emerged (Figure 3B). The percentage of dendritic cells (DCs, CD11b-, CD11c+) was progressively decreased during the development of castration resistance (Figure 3B). The percentages of CD4+ T cells (CD3+, CD4+, CD8-) and B cells (CD3-, CD19+) were significantly decreased on day 7 after castration, but then returned to near pre-castration levels. By contrast, the percentage of CD8+ T cells (CD3+, CD4-, CD8+) was not significantly changed during the development of castration resistance. Notably, 39.5 ± 5.7% of tumor-infiltrating CD4+ T cells were Treg (CD4+, FoxP3+) on day 7 after castration, versus 23.7 ± 2.5% before castration and 13.4 ± 7.5% when castration resistance had emerged. Alterations in these immune cell populations are also shown as number of cells per gram of tumor in Supplemental Figure 3. The evolving composition of the immune infiltrate in the TME is summarized in Figure 3C, highlighting the finding that the percentage of CD11b+ cells increased progressively over time. In addition, these data suggest that Treg-directed immunotherapy might be most active in the early post-castration time period.

Single cell suspensions of resected tumors before castration (Pre-C), day 7 post castration (Post-C D7), and upon development of castration resistance (C-Resistant) analyzed by flow cytometry. Data are representative of at least 3 independent experiments, with 5–8 animals per group.

(A) T cell populations as a percentage of CD45+ cells in the TME. Note that Treg are shown as a percentage of CD45+ / CD4+ cells for clarity.

(B) Additional populations of interest, note that here macrophages (MAC) are defined as CD45 cells that are CD11b+ F4/80+.

C) Summary data with Treg as a percentage of CD4 expanded for clarity.

*, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; **, P<0.001; and ****, P<0.0001; NS, not statistically significant.

Immune Activation in the Early Post-Castration Setting

To assess T cell activation, we determined cytokine production by tumor-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells using flow cytometry. For these experiments, raw flow data are shown in Supplementary Figures 4–8 and summarized in Figure 4A. Castration significantly increased TNF-α and IL-2 production by conventional CD4+ T cells on day 7 after castration (Figure 4A). Similarly, castration also dramatically increased IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2 and granzyme B production by CD8+ T cells (Figure 4A). For both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, cytokine production returned to baseline levels as castration resistance emerged.

We next explored cell-level expression of immune checkpoint molecules on CD4 and CD8 T cells during the progression to castration resistance. As shown in Figure 4B, castration significantly increased CD4+ T cell expression of PD-1 and CTLA-4, but not LAG-3 or TIM-3. By contrast, castration did not significantly increase the expression of PD-1 or CTLA-4 on CD8+ T cells. PD-1 and CTLA-4 can be co-expressed on CD4+ or CD8+T cells - as shown in Supplemental Figure 8, castration significantly increased the percentage of PD-1+ CTLA-4+ CD4+ T cells. Interestingly, the frequencies of immune checkpoint-expressing tumor-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in castration-resistant tumors were generally lower than those observed prior to castration. Taken together, these data suggest that immune checkpoint blockade might prove most efficacious when applied in the early post-castration time period.

Treg Depletion in the Peri-Castration Period Shows Pre-Clinical Activity

Based on the findings above, we tested the hypothesis that either PD-1 blockade, and/or Treg depletion would show pre-clinical activity when administered peri-castration. As shown in Figure 5, mice were treated with ADT alone, or in combination with PD-1 blockade and either a CTLA-4 depleting antibody (IgG2a isotype, (D))(18), or a non-depleting antibody (IgG1 isotype, (ND)). Three treatment doses were administered every other day, starting the day of ADT. As shown in Figure 5A, degarelix plus αCTLA-4 (D) or degarelix plus αPD-1 plus αCTLA-4 (D) reduced tumor outgrowth and delayed the emergence of progressive castration resistant disease. While both degarelix + αCTLA-4 (D) and degarelix + αPD-1 + αCTLA-4 (D) significantly enhanced survival, the addition of αPD-1 to degarelix + αCTLA-4 (D) did not significantly improve OS. This experiment was repeated × 2, in both iterations several animals in the mice treated with degarelix plus αCTLA-4 (D) showed long-term survival (> 7 months). In addition, αCTLA-4 (D) was well tolerated without gross evidence of weight loss, skin changes or other autoimmune pathology. These pre-clinical effects were reflected at the histological level, with an increased inflammatory (Figure 5C) and T cell (Figure 5D) infiltration apparent in mice treated with the αCTLA-4 (D) agent. Flow cytometric evaluation of the TIL from treated mice (Figures 5E–H) showed increased IFN-γ production from the CD4 and CD8 TIL in mice treated with the depleting antibody. Interestingly, Treg depletion was significant as a percentage of CD4 T cells, but was not significant as a percentage of the total CD45+ TIL (Figure 5G), and was not reflected as a significant change in Teff (CD4+ Foxp3- cells) to CD8 Ratio (Figure 5H). Further, Treg depletion was specific to the TIL compartment, as shown in Supplemental Figure 9, the prevalence of Treg in the tumor draining lymph nodes and spleen were not affected by αCTLA-4(D) treatment. Supplemental Figure 10 demonstrates representative flow cytometry data on Treg frequency and cytokine expression by CD4 and CD8 tumor infiltrating lymphocytes as a function of treatment group. Overall, these preclinical studies support Treg depletion in the peri-castration period, and suggest that the addition of anti-PD-1 may not be additive in this setting.

Eight week-old FVB/NJ male mice were subcutaneously inoculated with 1 × 10⁶ Myc-Cap cells, and treated as indicated. N=10 animals per group, repeated × 1.

(A) Individual tumor growth. Pie chart shows the proportion of complete responses (blue).

(B) Overall survival from time of ADT. P values determined by Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test in comparison with degarelix alone.

(C). Representative H&E sections from treatment groups as indicated. Magnification × 20.

(D) Representative IHC images of from anti-CD3 stained tumors. Magnification × 20.

(E,F) Cytokine production by infiltrating CD4 and CD8 T cells respectively

(G) Treg percentages as a percentage of total CD45 TIL and CD4 TIL respectively.

(H) CD4 and CD8 effector to Treg ratios, effector defined as IFN-γ+

Data shown as mean ± SD. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001; NS, not statistically significant.

Treatment Is Not Effective in the Absence of ADT

To investigate whether ADT was required for the activity seen in Figure 5A, we performed similar studies in either castration sensitive Myc-CaP tumors, or in tumors that progressed after initial androgen ablation. Antibody treatment was identical to that administered in combination with degarelix, a total of 3 doses of 10 mg/kg were given every other day. As shown in Supplemental Figure 11A, treatment of castration sensitive disease with either αCTLA-4(D) or αCTLA-4(D) plus αPD-1 was ineffective. Similarly (Supplemental Figure 11B), late treatment of emerging castration resistant disease was also ineffective.

Discussion

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a standard treatment for recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer; however, fatal castration-resistant disease ultimately emerges in the majority of patients. Using the Myc-CaP model, we investigated the immunological consequences of ADT over time, with a particular interest in changes occurring as castration resistance emerges. Similar to prior studies in patients (11, 12), we found that ADT is initially pro-inflammatory with a mixed T cell, Treg, macrophage and NK cell infiltrate. However, as castration resistance emerged, the composition of the infiltrate evolved, with CD11b+ cells becoming increasingly dominant, and effector T cell populations waning. These data are broadly consistent with prior human studies, but add an additional dimension in terms of timing.

Interestingly, CD4+ Treg appeared to be a fairly prevalent population in the early post-castration time period. Based on that finding, and on the increased expression of immune checkpoint molecules at that time point, we performed treatment studies in the peri-castration period. We found that, similar to human prostate cancer, Myc-CaP tumors were challenging to treat immunologically, with only the combination of ADT and a Treg depleting αCTLA-4 antibody showing significant treatment effects. The depleting activity of IgG2a antibodies has been shown to be dependent on engagement of the activatory Fc receptor FCGR4 (22). We hypothesize that the depleting activity seen in the early post-castration period is likely due to the recruitment of macrophages to the TME post ADT. Macrophages express the highest levels of FCGR4 (23) within the TME and this may explain why depleting αCTLA-4 does not have efficacy in the absence of ADT. While perhaps disappointing, these studies are not incompatible with human clinical trial data; anti-CTLA-4 treatment (ipilimumab) was unsuccessful in two randomized phase III clinical trials in castration resistant disease. Although infiltrating T cells express PD-1 post-castration, PD-1 adding PD-1 blockade to ADT was not active here, suggesting that the suppressive activity of Treg is likely dominant in this model. The lack of significant efficacy of anti-PD-1 in the phase Ib trial of nivolumab is also broadly consistent with our findings. It is noteworthy, however that a recent study showed interesting activity of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing on the second-line anti-androgen enzalutamide. Those results suggest that the post-enzalutamide TME might be different from that encountered in other settings, as suppported by data showing increased PD-L1 expression on the DC of patients with enzalutamide progression (24).

Taken together, our data support immunological treatment in the peri-castration period, and suggest that a deeper understanding of the immunological tumor micro-environment in that setting could lead to improved combination treatment regimens for castration sensitive prostate cancer.

Supplementary Material

Figure 1. Testosterone levels as a function of surgical castration or treatment with degarelix acetate

Figure 2. Gating strategy and representative flow cytometry data for indicated tumor infiltrating cell populations

Figure 3. Tumor-infiltrating immune cell populations shown as number of cells per gram or tumor

Figure 4. IFN-γ and TNF-α expression in CD4+ and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes

Figure 5. IL-2 and Granzyme B expression in CD4+ and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes

Figure 6. Immune checkpoint molecule expression on CD4+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes

Figure 7. Immune checkpoint molecule expression on CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes

Figure 8. Co-Expression of CTLA-4 and PD-1 on CD4+ (A) and CD8+ (B) tumor infiltrating lymphocytes

Figure 9: Treg percentages in tumor draining lymph nodes (DLN) and Spleen as a function of treatment group. Note absence of Treg depletion outside of the tumor.

Figure 10. A) Summary data on Treg frequency as a function of treatment group. B) Representative data showing cytokine expression by CD4 and CD8 tumor infiltrating lymphocytes as a function of treatment group

Figure 11. αCTLA-4(D) Treatment is Ineffective in the Absence of ADT

Eight week-old FVB/NJ male mice subcutaneously inoculated with 1 × 10⁶ Myc-Cap cells, and treated as indicated. N=5–10 animals per group, repeated × 1.

A) Treatment of castration sensitive tumors, ADT with degarelix acetate included as a positive control for survival.

B) Treatment of castration resistant tumors.

NIHMS910067-supplement-1.pptx^{(2.3MB, pptx)}

Acknowledgments

Financial Support: AG was supported by NIH T32GM007309. CGD was supported by NIH R01CA127153, the Patrick C. Walsh Prostate Cancer Research Fund, the One-in-Six Foundation, the Prostate Cancer Foundation, and the Melanoma Research Alliance.

The authors thank Ms. Muniza Uddin and Dr. Alan Meeker for assistance with immunohistochemistry.

Footnotes

AK and MJS are paid employees of Bristol Myers Squibb.

Conflicts of Interest: CGD has served as a paid consultant to Agenus, Bristol Myers Squibb, Compugen, Dendreon, Merck and Roche Genentech, and has received sponsored research funding (institutional) from Bristol Myers Squibb under the International Immuno-Oncology Network (IIoN).

References

1.Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM. Immune checkpoint blockade: a common denominator approach to cancer therapy. Cancer Cell. 2015;27(4):450–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Callahan MK, Postow MA, Wolchok JD. Targeting T Cell Co-receptors for Cancer Therapy. Immunity. 2016;44(5):1069–78. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Slovin SF, Higano CS, Hamid O, Tejwani S, Harzstark A, Alumkal JJ, et al. Ipilimumab alone or in combination with radiotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from an open-label, multicenter phase I/II study. Ann Oncol. 2013 doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4.Kwon ED, Drake CG, Scher HI, Fizazi K, Bossi A, van den Eertwegh AJ, et al. Ipilimumab versus placebo after radiotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that had progressed after docetaxel chemotherapy (CA184-043): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(7):700–12. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70189-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Beer TM, Kwon ED, Drake CG, Fizazi K, Logothetis C, Gravis G, et al. Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial of Ipilimumab Versus Placebo in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Chemotherapy-Naive Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(1):40–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.1584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, Gettinger SN, Smith DC, McDermott DF, et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(26):2443–54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Graff JN, Alumkal JJ, Drake CG, Thomas GV, Redmond WL, Farhad M, et al. Early evidence of anti-PD-1 activity in enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(33):52810–7. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Denmeade SR, Isaacs JT. A history of prostate cancer treatment. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(5):389–96. doi: 10.1038/nrc801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Chen Y, Sawyers CL, Scher HI. Targeting the androgen receptor pathway in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2008;8(4):440–8. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2008.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Furuya Y, Lin XS, Walsh JC, Nelson WG, Isaacs JT. Androgen ablation-induced programmed death of prostatic glandular cells does not involve recruitment into a defective cell cycle or p53 induction. Endocrinology. 1995;136(5):1898–906. doi: 10.1210/endo.136.5.7720636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Mercader M, Bodner BK, Moser MT, Kwon PS, Park ES, Manecke RG, et al. T cell infiltration of the prostate induced by androgen withdrawal in patients with prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(25):14565–70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.251140998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Gannon PO, Poisson AO, Delvoye N, Lapointe R, Mes-Masson AM, Saad F. Characterization of the intra-prostatic immune cell infiltration in androgen-deprived prostate cancer patients. J Immunol Methods. 2009;348(1–2):9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2009.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Ammirante M, Luo JL, Grivennikov S, Nedospasov S, Karin M. B-cell-derived lymphotoxin promotes castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature. 2010;464(7286):302–5. doi: 10.1038/nature08782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Drake CG, Jaffee E, Pardoll DM. Mechanisms of immune evasion by tumors. Adv Immunol. 2006;90:51–81. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(06)90002-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Sfanos KS, Bruno TC, Maris CH, Xu L, Thoburn CJ, DeMarzo AM, et al. Phenotypic Analysis of Prostate-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Reveals TH17 and Treg Skewing. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(11):3254–61. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Wada S, Yoshimura K, Hipkiss EL, Harris TJ, Yen HR, Goldberg MV, et al. Cyclophosphamide augments antitumor immunity: studies in an autochthonous prostate cancer model. Cancer research. 2009;69(10):4309–18. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Flammiger A, Weisbach L, Huland H, Tennstedt P, Simon R, Minner S, et al. High tissue density of FOXP3+ T cells is associated with clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(6):1273–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Selby MJ, Engelhardt JJ, Quigley M, Henning KA, Chen T, Srinivasan M, et al. Anti-CTLA-4 Antibodies of IgG2a Isotype Enhance Antitumor Activity through Reduction of Intratumoral Regulatory T Cells. Cancer Immunology Research. 2013;1(1):32–42. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Watson PA, Ellwood-Yen K, King JC, Wongvipat J, Lebeau MM, Sawyers CL. Context-dependent hormone-refractory progression revealed through characterization of a novel murine prostate cancer cell line. Cancer Res. 2005;65(24):11565–71. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Li B, VanRoey M, Wang C, Chen TH, Korman A, Jooss K. Anti-programmed death-1 synergizes with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor--secreting tumor cell immunotherapy providing therapeutic benefit to mice with established tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(5):1623–34. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Selby MJ, Engelhardt JJ, Quigley M, Henning KA, Chen T, Srinivasan M, et al. Anti-CTLA-4 antibodies of IgG2a isotype enhance antitumor activity through reduction of intratumoral regulatory T cells. Cancer immunology research. 2013;1(1):32–42. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Nimmerjahn F, Lux A, Albert H, Woigk M, Lehmann C, Dudziak D, et al. FcgammaRIV deletion reveals its central role for IgG2a and IgG2b activity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(45):19396–401. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014515107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Nimmerjahn F, Bruhns P, Horiuchi K, Ravetch JV. FcgammaRIV: a novel FcR with distinct IgG subclass specificity. Immunity. 2005;23(1):41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Bishop JL, Sio A, Angeles A, Roberts ME, Azad AA, Chi KN, et al. PD-L1 is highly expressed in Enzalutamide resistant prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(1):234–42. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials