Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2018 Apr 12;6(15):e00260-18. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00260-18

Draft Genome Sequences of New Genomospecies “Candidatus Pectobacterium maceratum” Strains, Which Cause Soft Rot in Plants

Fedor V Shirshikov a,b,✉,#, Aleksei A Korzhenkov c,#, Kirill K Miroshnikov d,#, Anastasia P Kabanova a,b, Alla P Barannik a, Alexander N Ignatov b, Konstantin A Miroshnikov a,b
PMCID: PMC5897815  PMID: 29650577

ABSTRACT

Investigation of collections of phytopathogenic bacteria has revealed some strains distinct from known Pectobacterium spp. We report here the draft genome sequences of five such strains, isolated during the period of 1947 to 2012. Based on comparative genomics, we propose a new candidate genomospecies of the genus Pectobacterium, “Candidatus Pectobacterium maceratum.”

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The genus Pectobacterium is a genetically diverse group of pectinolytic phytopathogens (1) with a broad range of plant hosts (2). Within a collection of 200 bacterial isolates, we have found several strains closely related to Pectobacterium carotovorum, which were repeatedly isolated from macerated plant tissue of cabbage and potato tubers in the Moscow Region, Russia. These five strains caused large outbreaks of soft rot in fields and storage during the period of 1947 to 2012 (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Statistics for the draft Pectobacterium genome sequences

Strain Origin Yr Size (bp) Coverage (×) No. of contigs No. of CDSsa GenBank accession no.
F018 Cabbage 1947 4,911,793 58 27 4,311 PDVV00000000
F131 Potato 1993 4,786,484 50 87 4,173 PDVW00000000
F135 Potato 2012 4,891,351 53 75 4,316 PDVX00000000
PB69 Potato 2012 4,993,011 44 21 4,382 PDVY00000000
PB70 Potato 2012 4,992,983 44 28 4,388 PDVZ00000000
a

CDS, coding sequence.

Bacterial strains were cultivated overnight in liquid LB medium at 27°C. Genomic DNA extraction was performed using the phenol-chloroform method. The NEBNext Ultra DNA library prep kit for Illumina (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) was used for DNA library construction. DNA samples were sequenced to generate 100-bp paired-end reads using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Paired-end reads were filtered and trimmed using CLC Genomics Workbench software (Qiagen, Aarhus, Denmark). The genome sequences were assembled using SPAdes software (3) and annotated using the Prokka annotation pipeline (4).

Recently, the general guidelines for using genome data in prokaryotic taxonomy were published (5). We applied these guidelines to determine the systematic positions of our strains. Pairwise calculations of average nucleotide identity (ANI) (6) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) using formula 2 for incompletely sequenced genomes (7) were performed. We used a set of 50 genome sequences, including those of our five strains and representative strains from all currently proposed taxa of the genera Pectobacterium and Dickeya. Based on the ANI distance dendrogram, our strains form a new, distinct clade that shares a common ancestor with P. carotovorum subsp. odoriferum. To distinguish members of the new clade from other subspecies of P. carotovorum, we calculated corresponding maximal ANI and dDDH values, as follows: P. carotovorum subsp. actinidiae, 93% and 50%, respectively; P. carotovorum subsp. brasiliense, 92% and 50%; P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, 95% and 65%; and P. carotovorum subsp. odoriferum, 95% and 62%. The ANI and dDDH values in comparison with those of the new species Pectobacterium polaris (8), which is closely related to P. carotovorum subsp. brasiliense, are 94% and 55%, respectively. The minimal intragroup ANI and dDDH values for our strains are 98% and 82%, respectively. Thresholds of species delineation by ANI and dDDH are 95 to 96% and 70%, respectively (5); the cutoff to distinguish subspecies by dDDH is 79% (9).

Thus, we propose a new candidate genomospecies for the new strains, “Candidatus Pectobacterium maceratum.” Based on high similarity with our strains (minimal ANI and dDDH values of 98% and 83%, respectively), the Finnish Pectobacterium strain SCC1 (10) also belongs to “Ca. Pectobacterium maceratum.” Considering that SCC1 is a model plant pathogen with a complete genome sequence, we propose it as a type strain of the candidate genomospecies. An interesting genome feature of all these strains is the presence of an evf gene, which encodes a virulence factor for persistence in the gut of Drosophila (11, 12). Perhaps, acquisition of the gene by some P. carotovorum subsp. odoriferum cells caused the divergence of “Ca. Pectobacterium maceratum” and evolution of the associated symbiosis with flies.

Further formal description of “Ca. Pectobacterium maceratum” is currently in progress.

Accession number(s).

This whole-genome sequencing project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1. The BioProject accession numbers are PRJNA414969 (strain F018) and PRJNA415106 (strains F131, F135, PB69, and PB70).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Russian Scientific Foundation (grant 16-16-00073). F.V.S. was supported by fellowships from the Russian Federation Government (2011 to 2012) and the Republic of Tatarstan (2014).

We thank Stepan V. Toshchakov for fruitful discussion and access to a sequencing platform hosted by Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. This research was made possible through support provided by Tatiana V. Ovchinnikova.

Footnotes

Citation Shirshikov FV, Korzhenkov AA, Miroshnikov KK, Kabanova AP, Barannik AP, Ignatov AN, Miroshnikov KA. 2018. Draft genome sequences of new genomospecies “Candidatus Pectobacterium maceratum” strains, which cause soft rot in plants. Genome Announc 6:e00260-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00260-18.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Zhang Y, Fan Q, Loria R. 2016. A re-evaluation of the taxonomy of phytopathogenic genera Dickeya and Pectobacterium using whole-genome sequencing data. Syst Appl Microbiol 39:252–259. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2016.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Czajkowski R, Pérombelon MCM, Jafra S, Lojkowska E, Potrykus M, van der Wolf JM, Sledz W. 2015. Detection, identification and differentiation of Pectobacterium and Dickeya species causing potato blackleg and tuber soft rot: a review. Ann Appl Biol 166:18–38. doi: 10.1111/aab.12166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, da Costa MS, Rooney AP, Yi H, Xu XW, De Meyer S, Trujillo ME. 2018. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:461–466. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. 2016. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints 4:e1900v1. doi: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.1900v1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. 2010. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2:117–134. doi: 10.4056/sigs.531120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dees MW, Lysøe E, Rossmann S, Perminow J, Brurberg MB. 2017. Pectobacterium polaris sp. nov., isolated from potato (Solanum tuberosum). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Hahnke RL, Petersen J, Scheuner C, Michael V, Fiebig A, Rohde C, Rohde M, Fartmann B, Goodwin LA, Chertkov O, Reddy TBK, Pati A, Ivanova NN, Markowitz V, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T, Göker M, Klenk H-P. 2014. Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083T, the type strain (U5/41T) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy. Stand Genomic Sci 9:2. doi: 10.1186/1944-3277-9-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Niemi O, Laine P, Koskinen P, Pasanen M, Pennanen V, Harjunpää H, Nykyri J, Holm L, Paulin L, Auvinen P, Palva ET, Pirhonen M. 2017. Genome sequence of the model plant pathogen Pectobacterium carotovorum SCC1. Stand Genomic Sci 12:87. doi: 10.1186/s40793-017-0301-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Basset A, Tzou P, Lemaitre B, Boccard F. 2003. A single gene that promotes interaction of a phytopathogenic bacterium with its insect vector, Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO Rep 4:205–210. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.embor730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vallet-Gely I, Lemaitre B, Boccard F. 2008. Bacterial strategies to overcome insect defences. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:302–313. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES