Abstract
A systematic comparative genomic analysis of all archaeal membrane proteins that have been projected to the last archaeal common ancestor gene set led to the identification of several novel components of predicted secretion, membrane remodeling, and protein glycosylation systems. Among other findings, most crenarchaea have been shown to encode highly diverged orthologs of the membrane insertase YidC, which is nearly universal in bacteria, eukaryotes, and euryarchaea. We also identified a vast family of archaeal proteins, including the C-terminal domain of N-glycosylation protein AglD, as membrane flippases homologous to the flippase domain of bacterial multipeptide resistance factor MprF, a bifunctional lysylphosphatidylglycerol synthase and flippase. Additionally, several proteins were predicted to function as membrane transporters. The results of this work, combined with our previous analyses, reveal an unexpected diversity of putative archaeal membrane-associated functional systems that remain to be functionally characterized. A more general conclusion from this work is that the currently available collection of archaeal (and bacterial) genomes could be sufficient to identify (almost) all widespread functional modules and develop experimentally testable predictions of their functions.
Keywords: Archaeal genomes, arCOGs, Membrane proteins, Gene neighborhoods
1. Introduction
Semipermeable lipid bilayer membranes are a major hallmark of all living cells. Despite striking differences in membrane lipid structure between archaea and bacteria [1–3], these two domains of cellular life share many membrane proteins, including several components of ATP synthase, NADH dehydrogenase, Sec and Tat protein translocase complexes and numerous transporters [4–6]. The total shares of (predicted) membrane proteins encoded in the genomes of bacteria and archaea are also similar, ranging from 20 to 30% [7–9]. Despite the substantial progress in understanding the organization of biological membranes and membrane proteins over the past several decades, membrane proteins remain notoriously difficult to study both experimentally and computationally. These difficulties stem primarily from the fact that most of the membrane proteins are highly hydrophobic and therefore insoluble in aqueous media. This property is also reflected in the sequences of membrane proteins that are characterized by high (often up to 90%) content of hydrophobic amino acid residues which typically form clusters corresponding to transmembrane helices (TMs) [10,11]. This feature is successfully exploited for membrane protein prediction [9,12–14] but makes it difficult to study such proteins using standard methods of sequence comparison. Another obstacle is that due to the weak constraints on the amino sequences, beyond the required hydrophobicity, membrane proteins often evolve faster than soluble globular proteins [15,16]. However, despite this relatively fast evolution, in many cases, some sequence similarity is observed between non-homologous membrane proteins, purely because of the presence of compositionally similar TMs. This “promiscuity” complicates the classification and functional prediction for membrane proteins. As a consequence of the structural features of membrane proteins reflected in their mode of evolution, the annotation of the membrane proteins in sequenced genomes is often poor, even for some components of evolutionarily conserved membrane complexes. In many cases, functional annotation of membrane proteins could benefit from taking into account the genomic context of the respective genes, under the “guilt by association” approach that is well known and highly productive in microbial genomics [17–19]. The success of this approach critically depends on precise identifications of orthologous genes in all analyzed genomes. Over the last several years, our group has been maintaining the arCOG database in which the clusters of orthologous genes from archaea are manually curated with respect to both membership and predicted function [5,20]. Here, using sensitive sequence comparison methods and gene context analysis, we investigate the arCOGs that include functionally uncharacterized proteins that are projected to the Last Archaeal Common Ancestor (LACA) and for which membrane localization is confidently predicted. We predict either general function or a specific cellular process for the majority of these proteins and identify several putative novel archaeal secretion or membrane remodeling systems. These predictions are intended to guide further experiments with these important archaeal proteins.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Sequence data
A 2014 update of the archaeal clusters of orthologous genes (arCOGs) was used to annotate protein-coding genes in 168 archaeal genomes [5], available at the NCBI FTP site (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/pub/wolf/COGs/arCOG/). Genome sequences were downloaded from the NCBI FTP site (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/Bacteria/). Phyletic patterns (patterns of presence or absence of given proteins families in the analyzed genomes) were derived from the respective arCOGs assignments.
2.2. Sequence analysis
Iterative profile searches with the PSI-BLAST [21], with a cut-off e-value of 0.01, and composition based-statistics and low complexity filtering turned off, were used to search for distantly similar sequences in NCBI's non-redundant (NR) database. Additionally, another sensitive method for remote sequence similarity detection, HHpred, was used with default parameters [22]. Multiple sequence alignments were constructed using MUSCLE [23]. Protein secondary structure was predicted using Jpred [24].
For each analyzed gene, the Pfam [25] identifiers and COG [26] numbers as well as the corresponding annotations were assigned using the RPS-BLAST program and the CDD database of profiles [27].
Transmembrane segments were predicted using the TMHMM v. 2.0c program with default parameters [9]. Signal peptides were predicted using the SignalP v. 4.1c program; the union of the three predictions (gram-negative, gram-positive and eukaryotic models) was used [28].
3. Results
We used the results of the reconstruction of the gene complement of LACA [5] to select 978 arCOGs that project to LACA with the probability of 90% or greater. In 105 of these arCOGs (~11%), two or more transmembrane (TM) helices were predicted (Supplementary Table 1). Proteins with a single predicted TM were not considered in order to exclude false positives as well as secreted proteins in which the signal peptide is often predicted as a TM. For each of these 105 arCOGs, we checked annotations of the respective proteins in the RefSeq database [29] and selected 15 families in which the majority of proteins were annotated as “hypothetical” (Table 1). These arCOGs were then analyzed on a case-by-case basis in order to characterize each family in detail and attempt to predict the function of these conserved but uncharacterized proteins. It should be noted that the set of 15 arCOGs is the low bound of the uncharacterized conserved membrane proteins because, although many other proteins in the 105 arCOGs set have some general function annotation, they have never been studied experimentally and their actual function or specificity might be different from the current assignment.
Table 1.
arCOG | Related arCOGs |
Number of TMs |
Presence/absence pattern in major lineagesa
|
Prediction/comment | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Desulfu- rococci |
Sulfo- lobi |
Thermo- protei |
Thaumar- chaeota |
Korar- chaeota |
Archaeog- lobi |
Halo- bacteria |
Methano- bacteria |
Methan- ococci |
Methano- microbia |
Thermo- cocci |
Thermo- plasmata |
Nanoar- chaeota |
||||
02673 | 07287 08873 |
3,4 | p | 1 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Sec system component, YidC ortholog (see Fig. 1); |
01994 | 01995 01996 05021 |
3 or 6 | p | 1 | p | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | p | 1 | Putative membrane remodeling system component (see Fig. 3); Many archaea have multiple paralogs |
02177 | 02178 | 7 | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | p | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | Putative membrane remodeling system component (see Fig. 3) |
01314 | 2 | p | p | p | – | 1 | 1 | p | p | p | p | 1 | – | – | Putative secretion system component (see Fig. 2,Table 2) | |
02884 | 02886 02887 11424 |
2 or 4 | p | p | p | – | – | p | p | p | p | p | P | p | – | Putative secretion system component (see Fig. 2,Table 2) |
00899 | 00901 00903 00902 00898 |
7–9 | p | – | p | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | p | – | Flippase involved in the protein glycosylation pathways; many archaea have multiple paralogs |
02245 | 6–14 | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | p | – | Cytidylyltransferase family enzyme involved in lipid metabolism | |
04002 | 08353 11324 |
2,3 | – | – | p | p | 1 | p | – | – | – | p | P | p | – | Cytochrome b superfamily, possibly involved in electron transfer as a component of redox complexes; expanded in several Thermococci |
02078 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | P | – | – | Possibly involved in electron transfer as a component of redox complexes; | |
03427 | 03426 | 4,5 | p | – | – | – | – | – | p | – | 1 | – | P | p | – | Transporter; expansion in Thermococci |
02008 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | – | p | p | – | – | 1 | 1 | – | Transporter component | |
04354 | 12 | p | – | p | – | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | – | P | – | – | Transporter | |
04469 | 11 | – | – | – | – | – | p | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | p | 1 | Transporter | |
02159 | 7 | p | 1 | p | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | p | p | – | No prediction; expansion in Methanomicrobia | |
03206 | 03207 05723 |
8–10 | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | p | 1 | – | 1 | – | – | Lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis |
Complete phyletic patterns are provided in the Supplementary Table 2.
The patterns are abbreviated as follows:–, absent in the vast majority of the respective genomes; p, partially present, and 1, present in the vast majority of genomes.
3.1. arCOG02673 and other homologs of OxaA/SpoJ/YidC insertase
YidC is an essential protein present in almost all bacteria and eukaryotes, where it functions in mitochondria and chloroplasts [30]. YidC is a membrane protein containing 5 or 6 TMs that catalyzes cotranslational membrane insertion of proteins in cooperation with the Sec translocase. Homologs of YidC in euryarchaea have been identified over a decade ago [31]. Nevertheless, these proteins are still annotated as “hypothetical” in most databases and a vast majority of complete genomes. In the arCOG database, arCOG02673 (COG1422, pfam01956, a typical representative is TK1516 from Thermococcus kodakarensis) corresponds to YidC and includes eury-, thaum- and korarachaeal sequences (Supplementary Table 2). This assignment that was initially based on sequence conservation is supported by genomic neighborhood analysis. The archaeal YidC homolog is encoded in a conserved gene neighborhood that is represented in most euryarchaea, thaumarchaea, korarchaea and nanoarchaea and is located in the vicinity of the secY gene which encodes the universally conserved membrane subunit of the Sec translocase complex (Fig. 1A). YidC has been shown to interact with SecY during cotranslational insertion of proteins into membranes, including such essential membrane proteins as a and b subunits of the ATP synthase and the twin arginine translocase TatC ([30] and references therein). In addition, YidC interacts with the ribosome and plays an important role in stress response [30], which is compatible with the colocalization of the yidC gene with ribosomal protein genes in most archaeal genomes (Fig. 1A).
Considering the presence of SecY and other Sec translocase subunits in all archaea, it seemed surprising that YidC had not been identified in crenarchaea [32]. In an attempt to identify YidC orthologs in these genomes, we analyzed the secY gene neighborhoods and detected two uncharacterized arCOGs, namely arCOG07287 (a typical representative is SacN8_02775 from Sulfolobus acidocaldarius) and arCOG08873 (a typical representative is DKAM_1151 from Desulfurococcus mucosus) that are located in a similar gene context in many Sulfolobales and Desulfurococcales. Using the sequences of these proteins as queries for PSI-BLAST search, we identified several additional homologous proteins that had not been assigned to the respective arCOGs by the automatic clustering procedure (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). For the arCOG07287, HHpred search initiated with Ahos_0869 protein from Acidianus hospitali identified weak sequence similarity to YidC (with 82.5% probability for COG0706, bacterial YidC profile). The arCOG08873 proteins are more diverged and HHpred failed to detect similarity with COG0706. Nevertheless, the best hit for this family (e.g., for the query protein Shell_1420 from Staphylothermus hellenicus) is the profile of COG1422 (corresponding to arCOG02673) with the probability of 79.68%. These observations suggest that members of arCOG07287 and arCOG08873 are crenarchaeal orthologs of YidC. We could not confidently identify a YidC homolog in several members of Desulfurococcales and all Thermoproteales. In the latter case, the best candidate is arCOG05556 (a typical representative is PAE2104 from Pyrobaculum aerophilum) which includes proteins with 3 predicted TMs, is conserved in most of the Thermoproteales and is located in the vicinity of the secY gene in some of them (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 3). Thus, this analysis shows that a great majority if not all of the archaea encode orthologs of bacterial and eukaryotic YidC proteins, which can be confidently predicted to function as insertases similarly to the YidC function in bacteria and eukaryotic organelles.
3.2. arCOG01314 and arCOG02884 are components of a predicted secretion or membrane remodeling complex
arCOG01314 (N-terminal part of which is known as DUF4350, pfam14258; a typical representative is TON_1832 from T. onnurineus) is represented in a wide range of archaea (Table 1) and in several bacteria. The proteins of this family contain a predicted signal peptide and a single C-terminal TM, indicating that they are anchored in the membrane and possess a large extracellular N-terminal domain. An HHpred search for Pyrococcus abyssi protein PAB1295 revealed similarity with GldG, the substrate-binding subunit of a gliding motility-associated ABC transporter (profile TIGR03521, probability 99.24%) and additional homologs including pfam08532, β-galactosidase trimerisation domain (probability 97.06%), roughly corresponding to the middle domain of the β-galactosidase from Thermus thermophilus, which has a flavodoxin fold [33]. This observation implies that arCOG01314 proteins might form homomeric or heteromeric complexes. The gliding motility system is currently classified as a Type IX secretion system and has been implicated not only in gliding motility but also in secretion of large proteins such as cell-surface adhesins SprB, RemA and chitinase ChiA [34–36].
The majority of the predicted operons containing arCOG01314 genes additionally encompass a gene encoding a secreted protein containing a von Willebrand factor type A (vWA) domain and a gene for an AAA +-type ATPase of COG0714 (Fig. 2A). The ATPase of this family and vWA domain-containing proteins also co-occur in other gene contexts in both bacteria and archaea, suggesting that this pair of proteins represents a distinct functional module (EVK, KSM unpublished). vWA domain-containing proteins have been extensively studied in eukaryotes and are known to interact with other domains to form multi-subunit complexes involved in a variety of cellular functions such as basal membrane formation, cell migration, cell differentiation, adhesion, signaling, and chromosomal stability [37,38]. The vWA-domains fused to AAA + ATPases function as Mg2+ and Co2+ chelatases that are involved in protoporphyrin IX biosynthesis; these chelatases are represented in bacteria, archaea and chloroplasts [39]. Additionally, vWA-domain proteins have been shown to associate with the FtsZl1 family and hence predicted to participate in membrane remodeling and vesicle formation [40,41]. In S. acidocaldarius, a distinct vWA-domain containing protein, Saci_1211 (ArnB; arCOG2900), is involved in repression of the archaellum operon [42].
Other components of the arCOG01314-encoding genome neighborhood include a number of membrane and secreted proteins some of which contain predicted extracellular immunoglobulin-like domains and predicted S-layer proteins such as arCOG02884 (a typical representative is MMP0360 from Methanococcus maripaludis S2) and their homologs (Fig. 2 and Table 1 and 2). Given that the majority of the components of this hypothetical complex are predicted to be membrane or extracellular proteins, it appears most likely that the complex is a novel secretion system (as opposed to one involved in vesicle formation). This prediction is in line with the recent identification of many unrelated types of the secretion systems in bacteria and the link of arCOG01314 to the gliding motility apparatus that is now considered a distinct secretion system as well [34,36]. Based on the predicted domain architectures, localization and topologies of the constituent proteins (Table 2), and symmetry considerations, we propose a tentative model of this new secretion system (Fig. 2B).
Table 2.
arCOG and its homologs | Domain architecture and predicted activity |
---|---|
arCOG01314 | Membrane-anchored protein with extracellular flavodoxin-like domain |
arCOG00435 arCOG00434 |
AAA + ATPase of MoxR/GvpN family, possibly involved in the complex assembly and regulation of its state |
arCOG02742 arCOG02747 |
Likely secreted protein with an N-terminal Ig like domain fused to the C-terminal von Willebrand factor type A (vWA) domain |
arCOG02487 arCOG12973 arCOG02488 |
Predicted S-layer protein with a Ig-like domain |
arCOG02884 arCOG02887 arCOG11424 |
Membrane-associated predicted S-layer protein with an extracellular Ig-like domain; 2 or 4 TMs; belongs to COG4743, pfam07760 |
arCOG03442 arCOG11910 |
Membrane-associated predicted S-layer protein with an extracellular Ig-like domain; 2 or 4 TMs; belongs to COG4743, pfam07760 |
arCOG03875 arCOG05098 arCOG10494 |
Membrane protein with 2–3 TMs |
arCOG07126 | Membrane protein with 5 TMs |
arCOG11232 | Membrane protein with 5 TMs |
3.3. arCOG01994 and its homologs implicated in membrane remodeling or vesicle formation
The arCOG01994 (a typical representative is MMP1596 from M. maripaludis S2) is represented by several paralogous proteins in many archaea; these proteins are known as COG1300 or pfam01944 (Supplementary Table 2). Altogether, this protein family is present in all major archaeal lineages (Table 1) and is widespread in bacteria as well. The only characterized family member is SpoIIM from Bacillus subtilis, a single-copy gene that is involved in sporulation as a subunit of the DMP complex that is responsible for the engulfment of the forespore [43,44]. The membrane protein SpoIIM initiates the assembly of this complex at the septal membrane and recruits the autolysins SpoIIP and SpoIID that jointly degrade peptidoglycan in the forespore wall [43–45]. No homologs of SpoIID or SpoIIP were detected in archaea. The SpoIIM protein is also encoded by many bacteria that do not form spores [46] and thus appears to perform a different function. In spore-forming bacteria, spoIIM gene is rarely found in a predicted operon or even within the same locus with other genes involved in sporulation. In several other bacteria, SpoIIM homologs are encoded in a conserved neighborhood with a vWA domain-containing protein and an AAA+ ATPase of COG0714 but never with other surface proteins. In archaea, arCOG01994 proteins are mostly encoded by stand-alone genes. However, several representatives of at least four major euryarchaeal lineages possess a predicted operon that consists of arCOG01994 and arCOG02177 (which also has been projected to LACA, see Table 1 and Supplementary Table 3). The arCOG02177 (a typical representative is MMP0328 from M. maripaludis S2) includes highly conserved proteins with 7 predicted TMs and a pair of conserved glutamate and aspartate residues in the loops between the TMs suggesting that these proteins might possess enzymatic activity. In Methanomicrobia, these two genes appear to belong to the same operon with the genes encoding glycerol dehydrogenase GldA (arCOG00982), which is responsible for the synthesis of glycerol-1P, a component of archaeal lipids [47,48], and another uncharacterized protein from the LACA gene set, arCOG04477 (COG1860, pfam03684, a typical representative is MMP1679 from M. maripaludis S2), which is present exclusively in archaea and contains two Fe–S clusters (Fig. 3).
Many archaea also possess other paralogs of COG1300 that form at least three more distinct families (Table 1). Among these, arCOG01996 is perhaps the most notable one because it belongs to complex gene neighborhoods (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 3) some of which have been described recently in the course of our systematic analysis of the archaeal genomic “dark matter” [49]. Here we add some details to that brief analysis. As shown previously, arCOG01996 genes belong to three- or four-gene cassettes with other genes that encode small, highly diverged membrane proteins (in Methanocaldococcus vulcanius, this cassette is typified by three genes: Metvu_0322, Metvu_0323 and Metvu_0325 from arCOG02054, arCOG01996, arCOG09673, respectively). The arCOG02054 proteins typically have 4 predicted TMs and belong to the COG2881 (pfam04893) family which is represented also in bacteria and eukaryotes. One of these proteins, Yip1p, has been shown to be essential in yeast where it promotes Rab GTPase-dependent vesicle formation in the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi complex and interacts with other membrane proteins, such as Yos1p, a two TM small protein, and Yif1p, a paralog of Yip1p [50,51]. arCOG09673 includes proteins with 3 predicted TMs that belong to an apparently fast-evolving superfamily along with multiple other distantly related arCOGs and possibly numerous other small membrane proteins that are present in respective loci but show no detectable similarity to other proteins (Supplementary Table 3). So far this complex or some parts of it were identified in several representatives of 3 major euryarchaeal lineages (Archaeoglobi, Methanococci, Thermococci), although individual components are more broadly distributed in archaea (Supplementary Table 2). In addition to genes encoding the conserved and diverged, small membrane proteins, these loci include genes coding for other potential components of the same system, such as an AAA+-type ATPase, an ABC-type transporter of the SalXY family, and S-layer proteins (Fig. 3).
Taken together, the observations presented here seem to suggest that arCOG01994 members and their homologs belong to protein complexes that are involved in membrane remodeling and/or vesicle formation. Given that arCOG01994 together with arCOG02177 are present in the majority of the archaea, especially in most of those with FtsZ-based cell division [41], these proteins might play some role in division as well.
3.4. arCOG00899, its homologs, and arCOG02245 implicated in Slayer protein glycosylation and lipid metabolism
arCOG00899 represents a vast family of integral membrane proteins (pfam03706, UPF0104, a typical representative is HVO_1859 from Haloferax volcanii) of unknown function, with homologs both in archaea and in bacteria (COG0392). While most members of this family are stand-alone proteins, some of them are domains of composite, two-domain proteins which has led to many cases of misannotation. In archaea, many UPF0104 members form C-terminal domains of the AglD family proteins (such as HVO_0798 from H. volcanii) that catalyze N-glycosylation of the S-layer glycoprotein and flagellin [52,53]. However, the glycosyltransferase activity has been shown to reside in the N-terminal cytoplasmic domain of AglD [54,55], which left its C-terminal membrane domain (arCOG00899) without a defined function. In bacteria, members of COG0392 often form two-domain combinations with the pfam09924 (DUF2156) domain. In B. subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus, such two-domain proteins are referred to as MprF (multi-peptide resistance factor) and participate in membrane lipid biosynthesis, catalyzing transfer of the lysyl moiety from Lys-tRNALys to phosphatidylglycerol [56–58]. It has been shown that the lysylphosphatidylglycerol synthetase activity of MprF resides in its C-terminal pfam09924 domain [59]. This finding is consistent with the structure of this domain, which has been solved at the Midwest Center for Structural Genomics and is suggestive of N-acyltransferase activity (PDB: 2HQY; Nocek, B., Borovilos, M., Abdullah, J., and Joachimiak, A., unpublished). In contrast, the N-terminal arCOG00899-related domain of MprF is required for the translocation of lysylphosphatidylglycerol from the inner to the outer leaflet of the membrane, suggesting that it has the phospholipid flippase activity [60–62]. In archaea, this gene is encoded in a conserved neighborhood with arCOG00563 (e.g., MJ_1079 from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii), an enzyme distantly related to oligosaccharyl transferase of PMT/STT3 family, and arCOG00897 (e.g., MJ_1080 from M. jannaschii), AglD-like glycosyltransferase, which is involved in the addition of the terminal hexose of the pentasaccharide [63]. In H. volcanii, HVO_2052 (arCOG00563) is encoded within a neighborhood containing genes of the second N-glycosylation pathway [63] although the exact function of HVO_2052 remains unknown. Another genomic context typical of arCOG00899 encompasses arCOG02876 and arCOG01403 (e.g., MA0797 and MA0798, respectively, from Methanosarcina acetivorans), a polysaccharide deacetylase family enzyme and a glycosyl-transferase, respectively (Supplementary Table 3). Taken together, these observations strongly suggest that arCOG00899 proteins are involved in archaeal glycosylation pathways. Furthermore, it seems likely that all members of COG0392 possess flippase activity and catalyze translocation of lipid and/or S-layer glycoprotein saccharide to the outer leaf of the cytoplasmic membrane.
An HHpred search started from M. jannaschii protein MJ_0933, a representative of arCOG02245 (COG1836, pfam01940), identifies sequence similarity with pfam01148, cytidylyltransferase family, with the probability of 97.57%. Moreover, the two aspartate residues involved in binding the Mg2+–K+ di-metal center that is essential for the catalytic mechanism in cytidylyltransferase [64] is conserved in arCOG02245 proteins. Several arCOG02245 domain-containing proteins, such as Mbar_A3310 from Methanosarcina barkeri, contain another, N-terminal domain that belongs to the same family although more similar to dolichol kinase Sec59. For example, HHpred search started from the first 210 aa of this protein identifies similarity with COG0170, SEC59 Dolichol kinase domain, with the probability of 99.85%. In this domain, the two aspartates presumably involved in catalysis are also conserved. Two enzymes of the cytidylyltransferase family have been characterized as essential enzymes of lipid biosynthesis: CDP-diglyceride synthetase CdsA (COG0575, arCOG04106, e.g., HVO_0332 from H. volcanii) and dolichol kinase (arCOG01881, e.g., HVO_0053 from H. volcanii). Both of these arCOGs were mapped to LACA and show an overlapping phyletic pattern with arCOG02245. Thus, it seems unlikely that these enzyme have the same specificities. The single conserved context for arCOG02245 genes includes the gene for undecaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase uppS (arCOG01532, e.g., HVO_2318 from H. volcanii, Supplementary Table 3) which catalyzes the successive condensation of the isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) molecule to farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) to form long-chain polyprenyl diphosphates [65]. This strong link suggests that arCOG02245 proteins might be involved in the pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis, in a step requiring kinase activity.
3.5. arCOG03426, arCOG03427, arCOG04354, and arCOG04469 include putative transporters
The arCOG04354 (pfam04165 or COG1906, a typical representative is PH0014 from Pyrococcus horikoshii) is present only in thermophiles, although not in all of them (Supplementary Table 2). An HHpred search (with another arCOG04354 member, Tneu_1186 from Pyrobaculum neutrophilum, used as the query) reveals significant similarity with a variety of substrate/proton or sodium symporters of the tripartite tricarboxylate transporter (TTT) class superfamily including pfam02447, gluconate transporter GntP (probability 99.69%), pfam06808 DctM-like 4-dicarboxylate transporters (probability 99.36%), and other transporter families of this class. The TTT class includes ATP-independent transporters that consist of two membrane subunits and an extracellular solute-binding subunit [66].
The arCOG04469 (COG1784, pfam01970, a typical representative is HVO_0611 from H. volcanii) is a euryarchaea-specific protein family that belongs to the TctA transporter family which is also a member of TTT class [67,68]. TctA is a component of the tripartite transporter TctABC, which consists of the extracytoplasmic tricarboxylate-binding receptor TctC and two integral membrane proteins, TctA and TctB [67]. In some Halobacteria and Thermococci (e.g., in the HacjB3_03065-HacjB3_03075 locus of Halalkalicoccus jeotgali), the tctA gene is located in a neighborhood with tctB (arCOG10722) and tctC (arCOG13681) but in most archaea arCOG04469 members are encoded by stand-alone genes (Supplementary Table 3). It has been suggested that TctA is the main component of the transporter and might function without the TctB and TctC subunits [66]. Thus, both arCOG04354 and arCOG04469, which have nearly complementary phyletic patterns (Table 1), could be carboxylate transporters. Two additional TTT class transporter components, arCOG01801 and arCOG01906, that are reconstructed to LACA (Supplementary Table 1) and typically are encoded in the same locus (data not shown) also might be involved in carboxylate transport. In these arCOGs there are several representatives of the genomes that are not present in arCOG04354 and arCOG04469.
The arCOG03427 (COG2510, pfam00892, a typical representative is HVO_0625 from H. volcanii) and its paralog arCOG03426 (a typical representative is MMP1587 from M. maripaludis S2) appear to be short variants of the drug/metabolite (DMT) superfamily transporters [69]. An HHpred search starting from any protein of this family identifies multiple DMT transporters with the probability of 90% and higher. The best match is pfam0892, EamA-like transporter family, which is involved in O-acetyl-serine/cysteine export in Escherichia coli [70], but other related transporters have distinct specificities [71]. In this case, genomic context does not provide any further clues.
3.6. arCOG04002 and arCOG02078 proteins implicated in electron transfer and energy metabolism
An HHpred search reveals that arCOG04002 (and homologs, pfam14358 or DUF4405) belongs to the cytochrome b family. For example, the search started with a typical representative protein Arcpr_0821 from Archaeoglobus profundus identifies similarity to profile pfam01292, “prokaryotic cytochrome b561”, with the probability of 96.55%, and many other sequences related to cytochrome b. The output alignments cover 2 TMs with two characteristic conserved histidine residues involved in heme binding, so that the archaeal protein represents about half of the cytochrome b561 molecule. Generally, cytochrome b family proteins are involved in electron transport [72,73]. Thermococci possess several paralogous members of this family some of which are encoded in a moderately conserved gene context represented, e.g., by the gene locus CL1_0239 – CL1_0246 from Thermococcus CL1. In addition to the arCOG04002 gene, this neighborhood contains genes of arCOG00709 and arCOG01619, aldehyde:ferredoxin oxidoreductase and NADP-dependent oxidoreductase, respectively; two genes of arCOG03957 encoding ferritin-like proteins; transcriptional regulator of the ArsR family (arCOG01679); an uncharacterized secreted protein (arCOG07800), and a secreted protein with a small coiled-coil domain (arCOG08354). In Thermococcus barophilus, the arCOG04002 domain is fused to a cytochrome b5-like heme binding domain, pfam00173. Thus, predicted functions of these genes are compatible with the hypothesis that arCOG04002 proteins are involved in iron-dependent electron transfer and might be components of multisubunit redox complexes, at least in Thermococci.
The arCOG02078 (COG1852, pfam01976, DUF116, typical representative is MMP0162 from M. maripaludis S2) also includes predicted metal-binding proteins. These proteins contain two TMs (the first one might correspond to a signal peptide) at the N-terminus followed by a globular domain with at least six conserved cysteine residues, three of which match the motif CxxCxxC that is characteristic of one of the families of ferredoxins [73]; otherwise, however, the pattern of cysteine conservation in these proteins is distinct. An HHpred search started with Metho_1507 from Methanomethylovorans hollandica detects its similarity to a variety of proteins with the receiver (REC) domain, including a hit to the PDB entry 1SRR), sporulation response regulatory protein Spo0F, with the probability of 91.55%. These results suggest that the arCOG02078 domain adopts a flavodoxin-like fold. Analysis of the relevant genomic contexts reveals association of this gene with sulfite or nitrite reductase components in most Methanomicrobia (e.g., the Metho_1504-Metho_1508 locus in M. hollandica) and with an oxyanion-translocating ATPase in Methanococci (e.g., the MJ1141–MJ1142 locus in Methanocaldococcus jannaschii). In some bacteria, this domain is fused to polyprenyl synthetase (e.g., Psta_0175 from Pirellula staleyi). Given that all the neighboring genes are involved in energy conversion, these observations are best compatible with a role of arCOG02078 in electron transfer.
3.7. Other ancestral arCOGs that include membrane proteins
The arCOG02008 (COG3371, pfam06197, a typical representative is Saci_1688 from S acidocaldarius) family is conserved in diverse archaea but rare in bacteria. As suggested by HHpred search results, arCOG02008 proteins are homologous to eukaryotic proteins of the Frag1/DRAM/Sfk1 family (e.g., the search started with OCC_03592 from Thermococcus litoralis identifies pfam10277, Frag1/DRAM/Sfk1 family with the probability of 98.33%). In eukaryotes, these proteins are involved in stress response and lipid metabolism but their exact function is not clear [74,75]. There is no distinct, conserved context associated with these genes in archaeal genomes although they are often encoded next to the ABC-type transporter operons. In Thermococci, this gene is often located near the tRNA S(4)U 4-thiouridine synthase gene [76] suggesting that arCOG02008 could be involved in sulfur transfer. The presence of a strictly conserved histidine is compatible with this hypothesis given that a catalytic histidine is involved in the mechanism of acyl-CoA thioesterases and other sulfur-transfer enzymes [77].
Members of arCOG03206 (COG1822, pfam01901, a typical representative is MMP1111 from M. maripaludis S2) and their paralogs are present only in three major euryarchaeal lineages and in Korarchaeum (Table 1). Typically, two paralogs are encoded within the same predicted operon together with a gene of arCOG03414, an uncharacterized secreted protein (Supplementary Table 3). Additionally, these three genes often co-localize with arCOG00563 or arCOG00566, both predicted glycosyltransferases of the PMT family (Supplementary Table 3). HHpred identifies significant similarity of the arCOG03206 proteins with O-antigen polysaccharide polymerase Wzy (e.g., a search initiated with MJ0420 from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii detects similarity with the profile for pfam14296, O-antigen polysaccharide polymerase Wzy, with the probability of 98.12%), the enzyme responsible for polysaccharide polymerization in the pathway of complex lipopolysaccharide (e.g., lipid A in Proteobacteria) biosynthesis [78]. Several archaeal proteins, including MJ0420, have been annotated as “O-antigen polymerase”. The results of an HHpred search started from Mefer_1301 from Methanocaldococcus fervens, which belongs to arCOG03414, reveal significant similarity with a part of the sequence of the sugar-binding domain of the archaeal transcriptional regulator TrmB (probability 99.52%). Thus, arCOG03206, its paralogs, and arCOG03414 are likely to be involved in a lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis and/or glycosylation pathway that is specific for the respective archaea.
The arCOG02159 (COG4089, pfam07758, a typical representative is Saci_0392 from S. acidocaldarius) family is the only one of the 15 ancestral arCOGs analyzed here for which only a general functional prediction appeared attainable. This arCOG includes proteins with moderately conserved sequences containing 6 predicted TMs and a relatively large (about 50 amino acids) loop between TM2 and TM3 for which an all-beta secondary structure is predicted. Homologs of these proteins are present also in several bacteria where they are encoded in a moderately conserved gene neighborhood together with Stage II sporulation protein P (SpoIIP, pfam07454) and another uncharacterized gene, yphB, which is involved in sporulation in B. subtilis (pfam14045, YIEGIA protein). SpoIIP is an enzyme related to the N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase (pfam01520) family and in spore-forming bacteria is a subunit of the DMP complex mentioned above in connection with the archaeal SpoIIM homolog. Similarly to SpoIIM, SpoIIP is present in many bacteria that do not form spores. Thus, SpoIIP and by inference arCOG02159 proteins could represent yet another protein complex involved in membrane remodeling.
4. Discussion
The above-described analysis of 15 ancestral arCOGs that include predicted membrane proteins led to the identification of the universal protein insertase YidC in the great majority of archaea, identification of several putative secretion and/or membrane remodeling systems, and more general prediction of membrane-associated functions for several other proteins. It should be noted that comparative genomic analysis presented here yielded functional prediction not only for the highly conserved proteins that were used as seeds but also for numerous proteins with which these conserved proteins share genomic neighborhoods. The results of this work, together with our previous observations made using a complementary approach [49], reveal an unexpected diversity of putative membrane-associated functional systems in archaea, in particular those implicated in secretion. The presently known archaeal secretion and membrane remodeling systems might represent the tip of the proverbial iceberg of diverse molecular machines that remain to be characterized experimentally.
The most consequential general conclusion from the present analysis is that the already available collection of archaeal (and bacterial) genomes, albeit only a drop in the bucket of the entire microbial world, seems to be sufficient to obtain specific functional predictions for the great majority – if not all – highly conserved genes and functional systems. Beyond doubt, a long “tail” of rare and highly variable systems will remain uncharacterized for many years to come but the widespread ones appear to be tractable now. Thus, a complete census of such functional modules based on a combination of exhaustive sequence analysis, structure prediction, comparison of phyletic patterns, and genomic neighborhood analysis (the “guilt by association” approach) seems to be both a worthy and a feasible undertaking.
Another observation with a general impact stems from the analysis of YidC, the nearly universal membrane insertase that, until this work, was conspicuously undetectable in Crenarchaeota. A combination of comparative genomics and in-depth protein sequence analysis allowed us to pinpoint the likely orthologs of YidC in nearly all archaea although in some of these organisms, the sequence similarity is near the limit of detection. Such findings “restore” the universality of widespread genes but also indicate that even proteins present in (nearly) all cellular life forms can show surprising level of variation that probably reflects functional differences between the respective systems. Similar observations have been made previously in our analysis of DNA replication [79,80] and cell division [41] systems of archaea. Thus, focused search for highly diverged orthologs of otherwise highly conserved genes, followed by experimental validation, seems to be a promising research program.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Yuri Wolf for providing Perl scripts for genomic neighborhood analysis and other help. KSM, MYG and EVK are supported by the NIH Intramural Research Program at the National Library of Medicine, US Department of Health and Human Services.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2015.01.004.
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Koga Y. From promiscuity to the lipid divide: on the evolution of distinct membranes in archaea and bacteria. J Mol Evol. 2014;78:234–242. doi: 10.1007/s00239-014-9613-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mulkidjanian AY, Galperin MY, Koonin EV. Co-evolution of primordial membranes and membrane proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009;34:206–215. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Koga Y, Morii H. Biosynthesis of ether-type polar lipids in archaea and evolutionary considerations. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007;71:97–120. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00033-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Makarova KS, Koonin EV. Comparative genomics of archaea: how much have we learned in six years, and what's next? Genome Biol. 2003;4:115. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-8-115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wolf YI, Makarova KS, Yutin N, Koonin EV. Updated clusters of orthologous genes for archaea: a complex ancestor of the archaea and the byways of horizontal gene transfer. Biol Direct. 2012;7:46. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-7-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mirkin BG, Fenner TI, Galperin MY, Koonin EV. Algorithms for computing parsimonious evolutionary scenarios for genome evolution, the last universal common ancestor and dominance of horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of prokaryotes. BMC Evol Biol. 2003;3:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-3-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Koonin EV, Mushegian AR, Galperin MY, Walker DR. Comparison of archaeal and bacterial genomes: computer analysis of protein sequences predicts novel functions and suggests a chimeric origin for the archaea. Mol Microbiol. 1997;25:619–637. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4821861.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Frishman D, Mewes HW. Protein structural classes in five complete genomes. Nat Struct Biol. 1997;4:626–628. doi: 10.1038/nsb0897-626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lam VH, Lee JH, Silverio A, Chan H, Gomolplitinant KM, Povolotsky TL, Orlova E, Sun EI, Welliver CH, Saier MH., Jr Pathways of transport protein evolution: recent advances. Biol Chem. 2011;392:5–12. doi: 10.1515/BC.2011.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Neumann S, Fuchs A, Mulkidjanian A, Frishman D. Current status of membrane protein structure classification. Proteins. 2010;78:1760–1773. doi: 10.1002/prot.22692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Neumann S, Fuchs A, Hummel B, Frishman D. Classification of alpha-helical membrane proteins using predicted helix architectures. PLoS One. 2013;8:e77491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yen MR, Choi J, Saier MH., Jr Bioinformatic analyses of transmembrane transport: novel software for deducing protein phylogeny, topology, and evolution. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;17:163–176. doi: 10.1159/000239667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yan Q. Bioinformatics and data integration in membrane transporter studies. Methods Mol Biol. 2003;227:37–60. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-387-9:37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nogueira T, Touchon M, Rocha EP. Rapid evolution of the sequences and gene repertoires of secreted proteins in bacteria. PLoS One. 2012;7:e49403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lolkema JS, Slotboom DJ. Hydropathy profile alignment: a tool to search for structural homologues of membrane proteins. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1998;22:305–322. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1998.tb00372.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Aravind L. Guilt by association: contextual information in genome analysis. Genome Res. 2000;10:1074–1077. doi: 10.1101/gr.10.8.1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Galperin MY, Koonin EV. Who's your neighbor? New computational approaches for functional genomics. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18:609–613. doi: 10.1038/76443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Franceschini A, Szklarczyk D, Frankild S, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Lin J, Minguez P, Bork P, von Mering C, Jensen LJ. STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D808–D815. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Makarova KS, Sorokin AV, Novichkov PS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Clusters of orthologous genes for 41 archaeal genomes and implications for evolutionary genomics of archaea. Biol Direct. 2007;2:33. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-2-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Soding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W244–W248. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cole C, Barber JD, Barton GJ. The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W197–W201. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Finn RD, Bateman A, Clements J, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Heger A, Hetherington K, Holm L, Mistry J, Sonnhammer EL, Tate J, Punta M. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D222–D230. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Galperin MY, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D261–D269. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, Fong JH, Geer LY, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, He S, Hurwitz DI, Jackson JD, Ke Z, Lanczycki CJ, Liebert CA, Liu C, Lu F, Lu S, Marchler GH, Mullokandov M, Song JS, Tasneem A, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Zhang D, Zhang N, Bryant SH. CDD: specific functional annotation with the conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D205–D210. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;8:785–786. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR. NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:D61–D65. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dalbey RE, Kuhn A, Zhu L, Kiefer D. The membrane insertase YidC. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843:1489–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yen MR, Harley KT, Tseng YH, Saier MH., Jr Phylogenetic and structural analyses of the oxa1 family of protein translocases. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;204:223–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10889.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Albers SV, Szabo Z, Driessen AJ. Protein secretion in the Archaea: multiple paths towards a unique cell surface. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:537–547. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hidaka M, Fushinobu S, Ohtsu N, Motoshima H, Matsuzawa H, Shoun H, Wakagi T. Trimeric crystal structure of the glycoside hydrolase family 42 beta-galactosidase from Thermus thermophilus A4 and the structure of its complex with galactose. J Mol Biol. 2002;322:79–91. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00746-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kharade SS, McBride MJ. Flavobacterium johnsoniae PorV is required for secretion of a subset of proteins targeted to the type IX secretion system. J Bacteriol. 2015;197:147–158. doi: 10.1128/JB.02085-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shrivastava A, Johnston JJ, van Baaren JM, McBride MJ. Flavobacterium johnsoniae GldK, GldL, GldM, and SprA are required for secretion of the cell surface gliding motility adhesins SprB and RemA. J Bacteriol. 2013;195:3201–3212. doi: 10.1128/JB.00333-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Desvaux M, Hebraud M, Talon R, Henderson IR. Secretion and subcellular localizations of bacterial proteins: a semantic awareness issue. Trends Microbiol. 2009;17:139–145. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Whittaker CA, Hynes RO. Distribution and evolution of von Willebrand/integrin A domains: widely dispersed domains with roles in cell adhesion and elsewhere. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:3369–3387. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-05-0259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Springer TA. Complement and the multifaceted functions of VWA and integrin I domains. Structure. 2006;14:1611–1616. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2006.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Xiong J, Bauer CE. Complex evolution of photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:503–521. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Makarova KS, Koonin EV. Two new families of the FtsZ-tubulin protein superfamily implicated in membrane remodeling in diverse bacteria and archaea. Biol Direct. 2010;5:33. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-5-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Makarova KS, Yutin N, Bell SD, Koonin EV. Evolution of diverse cell division and vesicle formation systems in Archaea. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:731–741. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Reimann J, Lassak K, Khadouma S, Ettema TJ, Yang N, Driessen AJ, Klingl A, Albers SV. Regulation of archaella expression by the FHA and von Willebrand domain-containing proteins ArnA and ArnB in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. Mol Microbiol. 2012;86:24–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Broder DH, Pogliano K. Forespore engulfment mediated by a ratchet-like mechanism. Cell. 2006;126:917–928. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Higgins D, Dworkin J. Recent progress in Bacillus subtilis sporulation. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36:131–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00310.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chastanet A, Losick R. Engulfment during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is governed by a multi-protein complex containing tandemly acting autolysins. Mol Microbiol. 2007;64:139–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05652.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rigden DJ, Galperin MY. Sequence analysis of GerM and SpoVS, uncharacterized bacterial 'sporulation' proteins with widespread phylogenetic distribution. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:1793–1797. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Han JS, Ishikawa K. Active site of Zn2+-dependent sn-glycerol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase from Aeropyrum pernix K1. Archaea. 2005;1:311–317. doi: 10.1155/2005/257264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nishihara M, Yamazaki T, Oshima T, Koga Y. sn-glycerol-1-phosphate-forming activities in Archaea: separation of archaeal phospholipid biosynthesis and glycerol catabolism by glycerophosphate enantiomers. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:1330–1333. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.4.1330-1333.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Forterre P, Prangishvili D, Krupovic M, Koonin EV. Dark matter in archaeal genomes: a rich source of novel mobile elements, defense systems and secretory complexes. Extremophiles. 2014;18:877–893. doi: 10.1007/s00792-014-0672-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Heidtman M, Chen CZ, Collins RN, Barlowe C. Yos1p is a novel subunit of the Yip1p-Yif1p complex and is required for transport between the endoplasmic reticulum and the golgi complex. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:1673–1683. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-10-0873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Moresco EM, Brandl K. Linking membrane trafficking and intestinal homeostasis. tissue barriers. 2013;1:e23119. doi: 10.4161/tisb.23119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Abu-Qarn M, Yurist-Doutsch S, Giordano A, Trauner A, Morris HR, Hitchen P, Medalia O, Dell A, Eichler J. Haloferax volcanii AglB and AglD are involved in N-glycosylation of the S-layer glycoprotein and proper assembly of the surface layer. J Mol Biol. 2007;374:1224–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tripepi M, You J, Temel S, Onder O, Brisson D, Pohlschroder M. N-glyco–sylation of Haloferax volcanii flagellins requires known Agl proteins and is essential for biosynthesis of stable flagella. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:4876–4887. doi: 10.1128/JB.00731-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Plavner N, Eichler J. Defining the topology of the N-glycosylation pathway in the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:8045–8052. doi: 10.1128/JB.01200-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kaminski L, Eichler J. Identification of residues important for the activity of Haloferax volcanii AglD, a component of the archaeal N-glycosylation pathway. Archaea. 2010;2010:315108. doi: 10.1155/2010/315108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Salzberg LI, Helmann JD. Phenotypic and transcriptomic characterization of Bacillus subtilis mutants with grossly altered membrane composition. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:7797–7807. doi: 10.1128/JB.00720-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Roy H, Ibba M. Monitoring Lys-tRNALys phosphatidylglycerol transferase activity. Methods. 2008;44:164–169. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2007.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Oku Y, Kurokawa K, Ichihashi N, Sekimizu K. Characterization of the Staphylococcus aureus mprF gene, involved in lysinylation of phosphatidyl-glycerol. Microbiology. 2004;150:45–51. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26706-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ernst CM, Staubitz P, Mishra NN, Yang SJ, Hornig G, Kalbacher H, Bayer AS, Kraus D, Peschel A. The bacterial defensin resistance protein MprF consists of separable domains for lipid lysinylation and antimicrobial peptide repulsion. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000660. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Dey A, Wall D. A genetic screen in Myxococcus xanthus identifies mutants that uncouple outer membrane exchange from a downstream cellular response. J Bacteriol. 2014;196:4324–4332. doi: 10.1128/JB.02217-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Slavetinsky CJ, Peschel A, Ernst CM. Alanyl-phosphatidylglycerol and lysyl-phosphatidylglycerol are translocated by the same MprF flippases and have similar capacities to protect against the antibiotic daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:3492–3497. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00370-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ernst CM, Peschel A. Broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptide resistance by MprF-mediated aminoacylation and flipping of phospholipids. Mol Microbiol. 2011;80:290–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07576.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Jarrell KF, Ding Y, Meyer BH, Albers SV, Kaminski L, Eichler J. N-linked glycosylation in Archaea: a structural, functional, and genetic analysis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2014;78:304–341. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00052-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Liu X, Yin Y, Wu J, Liu Z. Structure and mechanism of an intramembrane liponucleotide synthetase central for phospholipid biosynthesis. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4244. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Takahashi S, Koyama T. Structure and function of cis-prenyl chain elongating enzymes. Chem Rec. 2006;6:194–205. doi: 10.1002/tcr.20083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Winnen B, Hvorup RN, Saier MH., Jr The tripartite tricarboxylate transporter (TTT) family. Res Microbiol. 2003;154:457–465. doi: 10.1016/S0923-2508(03)00126-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sweet GD, Kay CM, Kay WW. Tricarboxylate-binding proteins of Salmonella typhimurium. Purification, crystallization, and physical properties. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:1586–1592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Batista-Garcia RA, Sanchez-Reyes A, Millan-Pacheco C, Gonzalez-Zuniga VM, Juarez S, Folch-Mallol JL, Pastor N. A novel TctA citrate transporter from an activated sludge metagenome: structural and mechanistic predictions for the TTT family. Proteins. 2014;82:1756–1764. doi: 10.1002/prot.24529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Jack DL, Yang NM, Saier MH., Jr The drug/metabolite transporter superfamily. Eur J Biochem. 2001;268:3620–3639. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Franke I, Resch A, Dassler T, Maier T, Bock A. YfiK from Escherichia coli promotes export of O-acetylserine and cysteine. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:1161–1166. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.4.1161-1166.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Vastermark A, Almen MS, Simmen MW, Fredriksson R, Schioth HB. Functional specialization in nucleotide sugar transporters occurred through differentiation of the gene cluster EamA (DUF6) before the radiation of Vir-idiplantae. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Dibrova DV, Cherepanov DA, Galperin MY, Skulachev VP, Mulkidjanian AY. Evolution of cytochrome bc complexes: from membrane-anchored dehydrogenases of ancient bacteria to triggers of apoptosis in vertebrates. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1827:1407–1427. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2013.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Liu J, Chakraborty S, Hosseinzadeh P, Yu Y, Tian S, Petrik I, Bhagi A, Lu Y. Metalloproteins containing cytochrome, iron-sulfur, or copper redox centers. Chem Rev. 2014;114:4366–4469. doi: 10.1021/cr400479b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Butcher RA, Schreiber SL. A small molecule suppressor of FK506 that targets the mitochondria and modulates ionic balance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chem Biol. 2003;10:521–531. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(03)00108-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Crighton D, Wilkinson S, O'Prey J, Syed N, Smith P, Harrison PR, Gasco M, Garrone O, Crook T, Ryan KM. DRAM, a p53-induced modulator of autophagy, is critical for apoptosis. Cell. 2006;126:121–134. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Liu Y, Zhu X, Nakamura A, Orlando R, Soll D, Whitman WB. Biosynthesis of 4-thiouridine in tRNA in the methanogenic archaeon Methanococcus maripaludis. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:36683–36692. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.405688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Cantu DC, Ardevol A, Rovira C, Reilly PJ. Molecular mechanism of a hotdog-fold acyl-CoA thioesterase. Chemistry. 2014;20:9045–9051. doi: 10.1002/chem.201304228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wang X, Quinn PJ. Lipopolysaccharide: biosynthetic pathway and structure modification. Prog Lipid Res. 2010;49:97–107. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2009.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Makarova KS, Koonin EV. Archaeology of eukaryotic DNA replication. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5:a012963. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Makarova K, Kelman Z, Koonin EV. The archaeal CMG (CDC45/RecJ, MCM, GINS) complex is a conserved component of the DNA replication system in all archaea and eukaryotes. Biol Direct. 2012;7:7. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-7-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Yutin N, Puigbo P, Koonin EV, Wolf YI. Phylogenomics of prokaryotic ribosomal proteins. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.