Abstract
In a preliminary case-control study, women with scleroderma more frequently reported having had hypertensive complications during pregnancy compared with healthy women. To prospectively investigate this possible association, we conducted a nation-wide cohort analysis of a major hypertensive complication during pregnancy, namely preeclampsia, and later scleroderma. Analyses were based on Danish register-based birth and hospital contact data on preeclampsia and scleroderma. We followed 778,758 women from time of giving birth between 1978 and 2010 to end of follow-up, emigration, death, or scleroderma diagnosis, whichever occurred first. The association was evaluated by incidence rate ratios, obtained in Poisson regression models. We report that preeclampsia is associated with a 69% significantly increased risk of later developing scleroderma. Though these findings do not impact clinical care directly, the association of preeclampsia with scleroderma underscores the significant relationship of preeclampsia and other adverse pregnancy outcomes with later disease in women and should be included in patient counseling and education.
Keywords: Preeclampsia, scleroderma, systemic sclerosis, epidemiology, Denmark
Introduction
Preeclampsia is a pregnancy related syndrome characterized by elevated blood pressure and protein excretion in the urine, affecting 3–7% of pregnancies and potentially causing mild or more severe organ system damage (1, 2). Scleroderma constitutes a group of autoimmune diseases the hallmark feature of which is skin thickening and, depending on the disease subtype, extends to multiple internal organs. The frequency of scleroderma is low, and risk factors are poorly described(3). Interestingly, in a preliminary case-control study van Wyk et al. report a significant association between preeclampsia and scleroderma(4). In their retrospective study, women who later developed scleroderma reportedly had twice the odds of having had a pregnancy complicated by a hypertensive disorder compared with healthy women. The study did not report associations in disease subgroups. The current brief report uses a prospective design to assess the association between preeclampsia and scleroderma proposed by van Wyk et al., but also extends the work by studying the role of preeclampsia subsets in overall scleroderma, as well as the role of overall preeclampsia in a subset of systemic sclerosis. Person identifiable data were derived from nationwide Danish registers on hospital contacts, birth characteristics, migrations and deaths.
Material and methods
Register linkage was performed based on the unique 10-digit Danish identity number found in all the applied registers. In the Danish Medical Birth Registry (5) we identified all women who gave birth in Denmark during 1 January 1978 through 31 December 2010. We excluded births with implausible(6) or missing size for gestational age from analyses. Similarly, we excluded multiple gestations and births with missing information on offspring sex. In the Danish National Patient Register (DNPR)(7) we identified maternal hospital contacts with preeclampsia occurring during pregnancy. In DNPR hospital contacts are coded according to the International Classification of Diseases 8th revision (ICD-8) during 1978–1993 and 10th revision (ICD-10) during 1994–2010. We used the ICD-8 codes 637.03, 637.04, 637.09, 637.19, 637.99 and 661.3, and the ICD-10 codes O14 and O15 to identify preeclampsia hospital contacts. We subdivided preeclampsia according to severity based on ICD codes (mild: 637.03, 637.99, O14.0 and O14.9 vs. severe: all other) and onset measured in completed pregnancy weeks (early: 22–33 vs. late 34–44). Also in the DNPR, we identified women diagnosed with scleroderma by ICD-8 codes 701.0 and 734.0 and ICD-10 codes L94.0, L94.1, L94.2, L94.3, M34.0, M34.1, M34.8, and M34.9. Within this group we identified a subset of systemic sclerosis(9, 10) by ICD- codes 734.0, M34.0, M34.1, M34.8 and M34.9. Date of migration and death was obtained for all women from the Danish Civil Registration System (11). We evaluated the association between preeclampsia and scleroderma by calculating incidence rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), obtained by Poisson regression. Person-years at risk were calculated from the date of giving birth to end of follow-up, emigration, death, or scleroderma diagnosis, whichever occurred first. We created preeclampsia exposure and covariates as time-dependent variables. All analyses were adjusted for attained age (5-year groups), calendar period (5-year periods), parity (1, 2, ≥3) and age at most recent birth (5-year groups). The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (2010-41-5082). According to Danish legislation solely register-based research does not need approval from the National Committee on Health Research Ethics.
Results
We studied a total of 1,537,747 pregnancies in 778,758 women. Hospital contact for preeclampsia was registered in 20,797 (1.4%) pregnancies. Most preeclampsia diagnoses were mild and diagnosed late in pregnancy. Women were followed for a total of 12,480,228 risk-years of follow-up during which 338 women were registered with an incident scleroderma hospital contact, translating to a scleroderma incidence of 27.1 (95% CI 24.3–30.1) per 1,000,000 risk-years. Of the 338 scleroderma hospital contacts 217 (64.2%) were due to systemic sclerosis. Mean age at diagnosis was 40.1 and 40.9 years for scleroderma and systemic sclerosis, respectively. Table 1 shows associations between preeclampsia and scleroderma, and in the subset of systemic disease. Preeclampsia was associated with a 69% significantly increased risk of later scleroderma overall (incidence rate ratios 1.69 (95% CI 1.02–2.80)). In the subset of systemic sclerosis we found preeclampsia to increase the risk of disease by 46%, however this finding did not reach statistical significance (incidence rate ratios 1.46 (95% CI 0.75–2.85)).
Table 1.
Scleroderma | Systemic sclerosis | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Preeclampsia | Events | IRR (95% CI) | Events | IRR (95% CI) |
- Yes | 16 | 1.69 (1.02–2.80) | 9 | 1.46 (0.75–2.85) |
- No | 322 | 1 (ref.) | 208 | 1 (ref.) |
IRR, incidence rate ratios; CI, confidence interval.
Discussion
Our observations confirm and extend on an earlier retrospectively designed study(4). We find a significantly 69% increased risk of later scleroderma among women with preeclampsia. Regrettably we were not able to disentangle the association in subsets of morphea, linear, diffuse and limited forms of scleroderma based on the available ICD-codes. However, in a subset of systemic sclerosis we report a somewhat weaker association. While the explanation behind the association is unknown, persistent fetal origin microchimerism is a plausible candidate.
During pregnancy cells routinely transfer between woman and fetus. In many women cells of fetal origin persist, presumably lifelong(12). The presence of two or more genetically distinct cell populations in one individual is termed chimerism. In parous women cells of fetal origin are often present at low concentrations, and hence this phenomenon is known as fetal origin microchimerism. Fetal origin microchimerism is observed at increased rates during preeclampsia(13). Some hypothesize that the increased fetal origin microchimerism seen in preeclampsia may contribute to known associations of this pregnancy complication with later-life health, including increased risks of cardiovascular(14) and autoimmune diseases(15) and reduced risk of some cancers(16). An association between fetal origin microchimerism and the autoimmune disease scleroderma was first investigated in 1998, based on a female predominance, disease peaks in post reproductive years, and similarities with graft-versus-host disease(17). This study reported higher quantities of fetal origin microchimerism in women with scleroderma compared with healthy women(18). The study by van Wyk et al.(4), and now also the present brief report indirectly supports the notion that fetal origin cells increase the risk of scleroderma by documenting increased risk of scleroderma after preeclampsia.
Both the quantity and type of cells acquired during pregnancy as well as other factors could impact later maternal health(18). Since the original description of microchimerism in scleroderma, differences of microchimerism and of maternal-fetal HLA relationships have been reported to vary according to clinical disease subtype(19). The two subtypes of systemic sclerosis, diffuse and limited differ substantially for clinical characteristics, autoantibodies and prognosis. While the scleroderma incidence in our study was similar to previous reports(3), the preeclampsia prevalence was somewhat lower(1). The latter is due to the use of hospital contact data which captures only the most severe cases. A validation study of preeclampsia diagnoses in DNPR showed that out of 88 women with preeclampsia as defined following a gold standard from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 61 (69%) were recorded with a preeclampsia diagnosis in the register(20). The authors of the validation study conclude that for the purpose of etiologic studies the preeclampsia diagnosis in DNPR has acceptable validity. Scleroderma diagnoses in DNPR have not been validated. In our dataset most women with scleroderma were treated in outpatient clinics (75% for systemic sclerosis and 97% for localized scleroderma). Registered scleroderma hospital contacts may represent severe disease, and we may thus have missed milder cases. However, because the scleroderma incidence in our study was at an expected level we do not regard this a problem.
While our findings do not impact clinical care directly, the association of preeclampsia with scleroderma underscores the significant relationship re of preeclampsia and other adverse pregnancy outcomes with later disease in women (14–16) and should be included in patient counseling and education. We speculate that one plausible pathway is through trafficking of fetal cells from the fetus, with subsequent persistence in the woman. Additional studies are needed that incorporate comprehensive analysis of prior pregnancy outcomes and maternal complications. In addition, further investigation is needed to characterize the phenotype and functionality of persistent fetal origin cells in women with scleroderma compared with healthy women.
Key message.
Preeclampsia is associated with statistically significant increased risk of developing scleroderma.
Acknowledgments
We thank Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen for making data available to us and Lone Skov for discussion.
Funding
The work was supported by the University of Copenhagen, National Institutes of Health (grant numbers AI41721, HD067221) and the Scleroderma Foundation (grant number TE5969).
Abbreviations
- DNPR
Danish National Patient Register
- ICD
International Classification of Diseases
- CI
confidence interval
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: None of the authors have any conflict of interest to report.
References
- 1.Hernández-Díaz S, Toh S, Cnattingius S. Risk of pre-eclampsia in first and subsequent pregnancies: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2009;338:b2255. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2010;376:631–644. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60279-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mayes MD. Scleroderma epidemiology. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2003;29:239–254. doi: 10.1016/s0889-857x(03)00022-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.van Wyk L, van der Marel J, Schuerwegh AJ, Schouffoer AA, Voskuyl AE, Huizinga TW, et al. Increased incidence of pregnancy complications in women who later develop scleroderma: a case control study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:R183. doi: 10.1186/ar3510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Knudsen LB, Olsen J. The Danish Medical Birth Registry. Dan Med Bull. 1998;45:320–323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:163–168. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:30–33. doi: 10.1177/1403494811401482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.International classification of diseases. WHO Collaborating Centers. Epidemiol Bull. 1998;19:7–11. no authors listed. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lambe M, Björnådal L, Neregård P, Nyren O, Cooper GS. Childbearing and the risk of scleroderma: a population-based study in Sweden. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:162–6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Olesen AB, Svaerke C, Farkas DK, Sørensen HT. Systemic sclerosis and the risk of cancer: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163:800–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09861.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pedersen CB. The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:22–25. doi: 10.1177/1403494810387965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bianchi DW, Zickwolf GK, Weil GJ, Sylvester S, DeMaria MA. Male fetal progenitor cells persist in maternal blood for as long as 27 years postpartum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:705–708. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.2.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gammill HS, Aydelotte TM, Guthrie KA, Nkwopara EC, Nelson JL. Cellular fetal microchimerism in preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2013;62(6):1062–7. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.McDonald SD, Malinowski A, Zhou Q, Yusuf S, Devereaux PJ. Cardiovascular sequelae of preeclampsia/eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Am Heart J. 2008;156(5):918–930. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.06.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jørgensen KT, Harpsøe MC, Jacobsen S, Jess T, Frisch M. Increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis in women with pregnancy complications and poor self-rated health: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014;53:1513–1519. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pacheco NL, Andersen AM, Kamper-Jørgensen M. Preeclampsia and breast cancer: The influence of birth characteristics. Breast. 2015;24(5):613–7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nelson JL, Furst DE, Maloney S, Gooley T, Evans PC, Smith A, et al. Microchimerism and HLA-compatible relationships of pregnancy in scleroderma. Lancet. 1998;351:559–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08357-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nelson JL. The otherness of self: microchimerism in health and disease. Trends Immunol. 2012;33(8):421–7. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rak JM, Pagni PP, Tiev K, Allanore Y, Farge D, Harlé JR, et al. Male microchimerism and HLA compatibility in French women with sclerodema: a different profile in limited and diffuse subset. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48(4):363–366. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Klemmensen AK, Olsen SF, Osterdal ML, Tabor A. Validity of preeclampsia-related diagnoses recorded in a national hospital registry and in a postpartum interview of the women. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:117–24. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]