Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2018 Apr 5;9:666. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00666

Partitioning of Fungal Endophyte Assemblages in Root-Parasitic Plant Cynomorium songaricum and Its Host Nitraria tangutorum

Jin-Long Cui 1,*, Vinod Vijayakumar 2, Gang Zhang 3,*
PMCID: PMC5900785  PMID: 29686655

Abstract

Endophytic fungi are an integral part and even seen as host organs of plant, influencing physiology, ecology, and development of host plants. However, little is known about micro-ecosystems and functional interactions of endophytic fungi in root-parasitic interactions of Cynomorium songaricum and its host Nitraria tangutorum. Here, distribution and dynamics of endophytic fungi were objectively investigated in their associations with C. songaricum and N. tangutorum based on mycobiome studies using high-throughput sequencing. Results suggest that endophytic fungi may be exchanged between C. songaricum and its host N. tangutorum probably through haustorium, connection of xylem and phloem in the vascular system. The similarity of endophytic fungal composition between C. songaricum and parasitized N. tangutorum was 3.88% which was significantly higher than the fungal similarity of 0.10% observed between C. songaricum and non-parasitized N. tangutorum. The similarities of fungal community in parasitized N. tangutorum were much closer to C. songaricum than to the non-parasitized N. tangutorum. The composition of endophytic fungi in these associations increased in progressive developmental stages of C. songaricum from sprouting to above ground emergence, and decreased subsequently probably due to host recognition and response by fungi. However, the shared fungal operational taxonomic units (OTUs) increased among interactions of C. songaricum with parasitized and non-parasitized N. tangutorum. Studies of bioactivity on culturable endophytic fungi showed that isolates such as Fusarium spp. possess the ability to promote seed germination of C. songaricum. Our study reports for the first time the special ecological system of endophytic fungi in C. songaricum and its host N. tangutorum. Overall, we hypothesize that a deeper understanding of the sharing, movement, and role of endophytic fungi between root-parasitic plant and its host may lead to finding alternative approaches to help increase the output of ethno-pharmacologically important medicinal plants.

Keywords: parasitic plant, plant-fungus interaction, C. songaricum, N. tangutorum, endophytic fungi, tripartite symbiosis

Introduction

Cynomorium songaricum Rupr., is a rare medicinal herb plant with pharmacological activities of treating various sexual conditions such as premature ejaculation, low sexual function, impotence, and spermatorrhea colic (Cui et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2013). It is often found parasitizing the roots of several plant families such as Nitrariaceae, Tamaricaceae, and Chenopodiaceous shrubs located in dry, rocky, or sandy soils of extreme desert environments (Cui et al., 2013). In China, Nitraria tangutorum and Nitraria sibirica of the Nitrariaceae are the preferred hosts of C. songaricum, and the flowering-fruiting season for C. songaricum has been described to be from May to August (Wan and Chen, 2000). C. songaricum parasitizing N. tangutorum forms a successfully evolving sustainable ecosystem in which mature seeds are dispersed with sand under natural desert conditions. Occasionally, a few seeds encounter the roots of N. tangutorum, invading plants using host root-secreted hormone, strigolactones (Kruh et al., 2017). The seed then begins to develop special intrusive organs such as haustorium which directly connects to the vascular system of host under suitable spatial and temporal conditions. Because C. songaricum plant has no chlorophyll and is unable to photosynthesize, it lives as a holoparasite, i.e., totally dependent on its host for nutrients and water. The parasitic seed germinates to form tubercle (rhizome) on host plant root in autumn and winter. Under suitable temperature and water conditions in March to early April, the tubercle begins to develop quickly, and emerges out of the ground as a low-growing inflorescence in late April to early May. After about 1 month, the tissue above ground becomes senile and forms numerous mature seeds upon pollination by flies, then drop and disperse in the desert sand. The rhizome underground, however, stays connected to the host root staying dormant for several years until the next development cycle begins. As an ethno-pharmacologically important and endangered medicinal species, the production of C. songaricum is far from meeting the demand, one tough problem is that the seed is very difficult to germinate due to the secretion of germination inhibitors such as abscisic acid and thicker wax coat which inhibits absorption of water and air that are essential for seed germination (Dong et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2011). For successful seed germination and development of C. songaricum, 5 years or even longer time is needed under natural conditions. Further, the studies on the mechanism of seed germination and development under natural parasitizing environment are largely undocumented to date. Compounding the matter further is the over-exploitation of stems and inflorescences (before seed maturation) for their popularity has proven detrimental to the preservation and conservation of C. songaricum on an ecological scale. Hence, for conservation of these medicinal plants a sustainable harvesting and manual cultivation technique is warranted (Cui et al., 2013).

Addressing this key issue, several tests were performed on improving seed germination rate (Dong et al., 2010). This includes breaking seed cover with ultrasonic treatment, soaking and then removing seed cover with a series of chemicals such as sodium hydroxide and potassium permanganate, or seed treatment with hormones such as gibberellins (GA) and naphthylacetic acid (NAA), or treatment with extracts of N. tangutorum root, and/or a combination of the above methods (Luo et al., 2013). But these methods exhibit challenges such as low germination rate, environment pollution, etc. Further, to date no one method has successfully been applied in sustainable production on a large scale. Other alternative methods yielding long-term reproducible solutions to sustainable production needs further investigation taking into consideration their development under natural parasitic habitats.

Endophytes are an integral part of plant biology and are perceived as host organs in and of themselves serving as important components of plant micro-ecosystems (Christian et al., 2016; Jia et al., 2016). Endophytes, especially fungal endophytes play important beneficial roles in host plant development and physiology including increased stress tolerance, enhanced root growth and provision for special nutrition and water (Wani et al., 2015). It is hypothesized that over long periods of co-evolution the endophytes not only establish special relationship with one another but can also significantly influence the formation and accumulation of certain key metabolic products altering the quality and quantity of crude drugs derived from medicinal plants (Faeth and Fagan, 2002; Firáková et al., 2007; Jia et al., 2016). Recently, a comprehensive review of published data on medicinal plants and endophyte relationships obtained in the last 30 years suggested that medicinal compounds could be effectively produced on a biotechnological scale if the relationships and the conditions that promote such production are clearly understood and cultivable endophytic fungi associated with medicinal plants be successfully established (Jia et al., 2016). The factors affecting the host-endophytic relationships and endophyte assembly in plant-parasitic interactions are limited, but previous results have suggested an important role for fungal endophytes and the diversity of fungal assemblages in key trophic interactions (Chen et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2006; Behie et al., 2012).

Nearly 18 years ago, research showed no overlap of endophytic fungal assemblages of parasitic Cuscuta reflexa and it host Cucurbita maxima (Suryanarayanan et al., 2000). However, recent studies have highlighted the rich and diverse endophyte fungal communities in the hemi-parasitic plant Macrosolen tricolor and its host plant Camellia oleifera, and that they were always distributed in nearly the same orders of the four classes of Ascomycota and one class of Basidiomycota (Zhou et al., 2014). Surprisingly, the endophytic fungal assembly are shown to exhibit clear shifts between the parasitic plant and its host, for example, Arceuthobium americanum and its host Pinus contorta (Martin et al., 2012), and Phoradendron perrottettii and its host Tapirira guianensis (Teixeira-Costa and Ceccantini, 2016). In other studies, it has been demonstrated that endophytic fungi from parasitic Viscum coloratum, secrete cellulolytic enzymes which can degrade cellulose assisting the haustorium of mistletoe to break through the cell wall as well as intracellular tissue spaces within the host Pterocarya stenoptera (Ding et al., 2008). Besides the above roles of endophytes in parasitic development, they also exhibit profound influence on seed germination, and it is a well-established fact that Mycena osmundicola and Mycena dendrobii are essential for seed germination of Gastrodia elata by secreting indoleacetic acid (Xu and Guo, 1989; Guo and Wang, 2001). Recent investigations are also providing new and exciting information on the potential of cultivable endophytic fungi (associated with medicinal plants) as reliable sources of plant secondary metabolite accumulation and bioactivity (Nisa et al., 2015; Chagas et al., 2017; Cui et al., 2017; Ran et al., 2017). While the importance of endophytic fungi to the growth and development of host plants is increasingly being substantiated, exploiting these endophytic relationships for production of medicinal plant-based drugs and mechanistic understanding of the benefits of these exact relationships is still very limited.

To gain insights into the fungal endophytes and the diversity of fungal assembly in C. songaricum and its host N. tangutorum, here we (1) investigated the genetic relationship, community assembly and distribution characteristics of endophytic fungi across the different developmental stages of C. songaricum parasitizing N. tangutorum. (2) Evaluated the potential of the identified endophytic fungal assembly for functional interaction, providing evidence for the application of a target endophytic fungal spp. for promoting C. songaricum seed germination under in vitro axenic culture conditions. Our results demonstrate that parasitic interaction is a significant factor in shaping endophytic fungal assemblages. We provide evidence for the involvement of few endophytes in plant development and physiology, enabling promotion of seed germination of C. songaricum. The information obtained from this study provides new insights into the tripartite interactions of N. tangutorum hosts, root-parasitic plant C. songaricum, and its fungal endophytes. Our study highlights the potential for exploiting alternative bioengineering approaches to sustainable production of C. songaricum.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material Collection and Sample Preparation

Healthy rhizomes of C. songaricum (CSR), parasitized root (SNT), and non-parasitized root (NT) of N. tangutorum were collected from the peripheral regions of Tengger Desert of China (38°44′–39°04′ N, 105°15′–105°22′E, ≈1305 m). (Figures 1A,B). For each plant species, only those samples with the same identified genotype (KX813699 for CSR, and KC813691 for SNT and NT) were used to conduct experiments in this study. Five developmental stages of C. songaricum, Tubercle (T), Sprouting (S), Unearthing (U), Maturing (M), and Atrophy (A), respectively, were sampled in November, March, May, June, and September from 2015 to 2016 (Figures 1CG). The collected samples were cleaned with running water, surface-sterilized with 75% ethanol for 1 min, 5% NaOCl for 5 min, and finally washed twice with sterile distilled water. One part of these samples were cut to particles about 1 mm3, then placed in DNA-Be-Locked reagent (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) to immobilize DNA for endophytic mycobiome study, while the other part was used for isolation of culturable endophytic fungi. Overall, eight plant samples were mixed and used in each treatment in CSR, SNT, and NT, respectively, and each treatment was set up as three independent replicates unless mentioned otherwise.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Habitat and root-parasitic development of Cynomorium songaricum on its host Nitraria tangutorum. (A) C. songaricum and its host N. tangutorum most often located in the peripheral regions of desert; (B) C. songaricum always parasitizes and connects with the root xylem and phloem of N. tangutorum; (C) A granulated rhizome is the living state of C. songaricum named the Tubercle (T) stage more so in the cold seasons; (D) The granulated rhizome will sprout when the temperature rises in March or April, named the Sprouting (S) stage; (E) C. songaricum emergence above ground, which will be collected as herb in April and May, this development is named the Unearthing (U) stage; (F) After about 1 month of growing out of ground, the mature seeds will be covered on the around dark-red head of C. songaricum, which is called the Maturing (M) stage; (G) After about 1 month, the stem and rhizome will decline and wither, named Atrophy (A) stage, and hence one development cycle is completed.

Analyses of Fungal Assembly in C. songaricum and Its Host N. tangutorum

To investigate the distribution of fungal endophytes between C. songaricum and N. tangutorum, genomic DNA of surface-sterilized CSR, SNT, and NT was extracted with Plant DNA Mini Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Doraville, GA, United States) following manufacturer’s instructions.

PCR amplification of the internal transcribed spacer region 2 (ITS2) in rRNA gene regions were performed using primer pairs ITS3F: GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC and ITS4: TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC. The PCR reaction system (25 μL) contained 1 μL of each primer (10 μM), 2 μL of template (50–100 μg/μL), 1 μL of dNTP (10 mM), 0.2 μL of TaqDNA Polymerase (5 U/μL), 2.5 μL of 10× buffer, 17.3 μL of ddH2O. PCR reactions were carried out as follows: 3 min of initial denaturation at 94°C, followed by 40 cycles of: 94°C for 30, 47°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s; and final extension of 7 min at 72°C. PCR products were recovered from agarose gels using PureLink Quick gel extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After quantification of DNA concentration using Nanodrop ND-1000 with software ver.3.3 (Thermo Scientific, United States), all PCR products were sent for high-throughput amplicon sequencing (in triplicates) using the Illumina Miseq platform (United States) at the Services Facility (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China).

Analyses of Mycobiome Dynamics

To shed light on the community dynamics of endophytic fungi, the rhizome samples from five different development stages, i.e., T, S, U, M, and A stage of C. songaricum were collected, surface sterilized, DNA extracted, PCR amplified, and high-throughput MiSeq analyzed. The community composition changes of endophytic fungi based on their developmental structures were analyzed and further compared.

Bioinformatic and Statistical Analyses

Raw data of pyrosequences were analyzed using the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) pipeline 1.8.0 (Caporaso et al., 2010). MOTHUR software was adopted to analyze retrieved sequences (Schloss et al., 2009). Paired-end sequences were assembled with software FLASH ver1.2.3 (Magoč and Salzberg, 2011). Those sequences that had low quality (multiple N, base pair mismatch, chimeras, etc.) or length shorter than 50 bp were omitted. Sequences were then denoised according to the method of Reeder and Knight (2010). The sequences with high quality were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a 97% similarity threshold using the USEARCH algorithm (Edgar et al., 2011). A “sub.sample” command was performed and all samples were adjusted, by random selection, to the sample with the lowest number of sequences (20,000–65,000 sequences per sample for Illumina and ion torrent data, respectively). Taxonomy was classified to fungal OTUs using the RDP option in the parallel_assign_taxonmy_rdp.pyfunction with mini-confidence of 0.8 (Wang et al., 2007). The reference OTUs were obtained from the UNITE database (Version 72). The difference in fungal communities of all samples was by ANOVA statistics, Multi_Dimension and VennDiagram package in R software based on OTUs. The alpha diversity was analyzed through diversity indices including Chao-1 richness index predicting the total numbers of OTUs in each sample, Shannon, Simpson index and coverage representing coverage rate. Beta diversity was exhibited through Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Principal Co_ordinates (PCoA), non_multi_dimension_analysis (NMDS), Unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) and Unweighted uniFrac. The genetic relationship of fungal OTUs and correlation was analyzed by Hierarchical Clustering dendrogram, Bray_Crutis_treeand“OUT_co_network”, based on R software.

Isolation and Identification of Culturable Endophytes

To isolate and culture endophytic fungi, surface-sterilized samples were cut to 2–3 mm cubes, placed on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 25°C in the dark. A total of 80 cubes were randomly selected to place on 20 PDA plates, in each plate were placed four tissues from CSR, SNT and NT samples, respectively. Three plates without cutting were used as culture-controls. The hyphae were sub-cultured multiple times to obtain pure cultures, then were recorded, numbered, and deposited in the Institute of Applied Chemistry, Shanxi University.

Identification of fungus was performed by methods described in Cui et al. (2015). Briefly, ITS rDNA region was amplified using ITS1 (5′-TCCGATGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) primers. The PCR reactions were performed as described earlier (Cui et al., 2015). The PCR products were sequenced at Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., aligned and blast analyzed against the NCBI database1. The isolates were assigned to different OTUs at a 97% similarity threshold of ITS sequences. Indicator genus or species were identified through comparing the similarity sequence with the threshold of 97 and 99%. Isolation rate (IR) = x/y × 100% (x, number of fungal isolations; y, number of samples per isolation).

Analysis of Fungal Activity Promoting Seed Germination

All the culturable fungi in CSR and SNT were investigated to detect their activity for promoting seed germination of C. songaricum in vitro. The fungal cultures were inoculated into 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 200 mL of liquid PDA medium. Shake flasks were incubated at 220 rpm on rotary shaker at 25°C for 7 days. Cultures were then separated into mycelial mat and filtrate using Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The mycelial mat was ground, weighed, and water added (1/10 mg/mL), after homogenization the mycelial extract was stored at 4°C until further use. Both filtrate and mycelial extract were sprayed on Whatman GF/A glass-fiber filter, respectively, and placed on petri dishes and sealed to keep moisture. C. songaricum seeds were treated to remove seed coat by soaking in 1 mol/L NaOH for 5 h, followed by (3×) rinsing with ddH2O, placed on moist filter paper, and incubated in the dark at 25°C. Care was taken to use appropriate negative controls in each case. Each group had twenty such repetitions for statistical analysis. The germination time and rate were observed and recorded every day for statistical analysis.

Sequence Accessions

Sequence data from 281 representative genera or species of OTUs from culturable endophytic fungi were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers KY379536-KY379816. ITS2 sequences that were identified in an earlier study are deposited under the GenBank accession numbers KX813698-KX813705 (C. songaricum) and KC813691-KC813696 (N. tangutorum). Sequences obtained from next-generation sequencing were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database in NCBI2 (SRA Accession: SRP128939).

Results

Diversity of Fungal Assemblages in C. songaricum and Its Host N. tangutorum

To investigate the diversity of endophytic fungi the in root-parasitic plant C. songaricum (CSR), and to analyze the difference in fungal endophyte diversity among C. songaricum, parasitized and non-parasitized N. tangutorum, SNT and NT, respectively, the fungal communities in the three host plant types were assayed in the surface sterilized tubercle (T) stage (was a granulated rhizome of living state of C. songaricum in cold season), which was observed as the initial period of parasitization (Figure 1C). Through Illumina MiSeq analysis we obtained 309,764 high-quality reads covering 5,358 fungal OTUs. The number of reads per sample was 64,792, 84,447, and 160,525 covering CSR, SNT, and NT, respectively, of which they covered 527, 1,514 and 3,371 fungal OTUs, respectively (Figure 2A). There were a total of 28 commonly shared fungal OTUs found in all three hosts, while the commonly shared fungal OTUs between NT and SNT, SNT and CSR, and CSR and NT were 1,120, 76, and 4, respectively. According to Venn distribution analysis based on ITS2 ribosomal rRNA genes, the similarity was among the three host plants was found to be 23.47, 3.88, and 0.10%, respectively (Figure 2A). Hierarchical Clustering dendrogram showed that fungal community of CSR had close genetic relationship to SNT than that of CSR to NT (Figure 2B), which was also supported by principal co-ordinates analysis (Supplementary Figure S1).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Distribution of endophytic fungi among C. songaricum (CSR), parasitized N. tangutorum (SNT), and non-parasitized N. tangutorum (NT) based on high-throughput sequencing of ITS2 rRNA gene. The fungal community composition and phylogenetic relationship were determined based on operational taxonomic unit (OTU) using a 97% similarity threshold. (A) Venn diagram of OTUs among CSR, SNT, and NT. (B) Bray tree plot showed relationship of fungal composition in CSR is closer to SNT than that of CSR to NT. (C) Phylogenetic tree of the top 100 genera, the most dominant twenty genera were marked, and the outer cycles were heatmap in three samples which showed that the fungi were orderly affiliated in Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Zygomycota.

A great number of observed endophytic fungi, exhibited fairly rich fungal diversity in these specialized desert plants. Analysis of species richness based on the comparison of many alpha diversity (identification of all species present) indexes such as; richness number, Shannon index, ACE richness estimator, Chao_1 index, and Simpson index among the three host plant types suggested successively increasing species richness among CSR, SNT, and NT, respectively (Table 1). Except for the identification of certain unclassified species, most of the endophytic fungi belonged to the phylum Ascomycota, followed by Basidiomycota and Zygomycota. A well-known xerophilic fungus identified among them was Aspergillus penicillioides. In other classified species, the most abundant fungal genus was Gibberella (5.92%) comprising three species G. tricincta, G. zeae, and G. fujikuroi. While, the most abundant of the Gibberella species was the G. tricincta which covered 10 sub-species in CSR, but were not found in both SNT and NT. The next abundant genus that was identified was the Fusarium spp. comprising 0.31% in CSR, 0.67% in SNT (the most abundant genus), whereas it could not be identified in NT sample types. To better understand the diversity and distribution of fungal endophyte genera among the three host plant types a phylogenetic analysis of relationships was constructed from the top 100 known genera in Figure 2C. Taken together, the results showed that the three host plant types had different specificities for fungal colonization.

Table 1.

Comparison of alpha diversity indexes among Cynomorium songaricum, parasitized and non-parasitized Nitraria tangutorum, respectively.

Sample Richness Shannon ACE Chao1_index Cover. Simpson
CSR1_1 64,792 1.29 ± 0.43 407 ± 50.70 380.2 ± 42.3 1.0 0.63 ± 0.14
SNT1_1 84,447 2.22 ± 0.06 1864.29 ± 93.0 1248.89 ± 31.52 0.99 0.27 ± 0.01
NT1_1 160,525 2.81 ± 0.08 3619.97 ± 420.2 3040.69 ± 22.81 0.98 0.35 ± 0.03

Richness, observed number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs); Shannon, Shannon index estimator; ACE, ACE richness estimator; Chao1_index, Chao1 richness estimator; Cover., Good’s coverage estimator; Simpson, Simpson index estimator. Values represent Mean ± SD (n = 3). The rarefaction of alpha diversity calculation included 309,764 sequences across nine samples.

Fungal Community Dynamics Across the Developmental Stages of C. songaricum Parasitizing N. tangutorum

Next, we aimed to characterize the dynamics of fungal community composition in each successive developmental cycle of C. songaricum parasitizing N. tangutorum (Figure 1). For this we analyzed the five developmental stages starting from T to A (Figure 1C was the T stage which exhibited initial parasitic development stage of C. songaricum with a living stage of granulated rhizome parasitizing root of N. tangutorum in cold season, and the granulated rhizome sprout when the temperature rises in March or April, named S stage as Figure 1D. Then the next development was U stage when C. songaricum grows out of ground in April or May as Figure 1E. After about 1 month of growing out of ground, the mature seeds will be covered on the around dark-red head of C. songaricum, which called M stage as Figure 1F, and after June, the stem and rhizome decline and wither, was A stage in Figure 1G) i.e., development stages depicting rising temperature in the desert conditions from November to May/June. The fungal OTU analysis suggested an increase in OTUs among CSR, SNT, and NT up until the U stage, while, the fungal OTUs decreased from stages U to A, probably due to the selective action of host plants (Figure 3). Interestingly, however, the fungal OTUs in NT, SNT, and CSR reached a maximum number at U stage of C. songaricum, respectively, which suggested that endophytic fungi may have had an elevated growth activity when root-parasitic plant grows out of ground/emerges above ground (Figure 3). In contrast, the number of shared OTUs among NT-SNT-CSR, increased successively from 28 to 202, from S to A stage, while the number of shared OTUs in NT-CSR and SNT-CSR stayed constant and/or slightly, respectively (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Dynamics of endophytic fungal community in C. songaricum (CSR) across five developmental stages of parasitized N. tangutorum (SNT) and non-parasitized N. tangutorum (NT). NT-SNT, NT-CSR, SNT-CSR, and NT-SNT-CSR represented the shared OTUs between or among of NT, SNT, and CSR, respectively; T, S, U, M, and A represented five developmental stages of Tubercle, Sprouting, Unearthing, Maturing and Atrophy, respectively. Y-axis shows value of OTU number, and left Y-axis exhibits the OTU numbers of NT, SNT, CSR, and NT-SNT and right Y-axis indicates the data of NT-CSR, SNT-CSR, and NT-SNT-CSR. Results are presented as the means ± SD of three replicates. P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.05, the difference in fungal communities of all samples was by ANOVA statistics.

To understand further the relationship between the shared OTUs in the five developmental stages of C. songaricum growth, a co-occurrence network (pattern) analysis was conducted using the first 100 OTUs. Network analysis indicated a close association of fungal communities in the three host plant types with respect to their developmental stages, i.e., T to A stage of C. songaricum growth (Figure 4). Further, aiming to understand their genetic relatedness, the first 50 representative fungal OTUs were used for phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Figure S2). This tree indicated that in the top 20 successfully classified OTUs (apart from the unclassified species), most of them belonged to well-known identified fungal spp. including Candida neorugosa (OTU3), Lentinula edodes (OTU5), Devriesia lagerstroemiae (OTU11), Gibberella tricincta (OTU15), G. fujikuroi (OTU16), Fusarium solani (OTU17), Tropicoporus linteus (OTU18), and Aspergillus sydowii (OTU20). These OTUs were found to frequently associate with CSR during its development, and made up their composition comprising of unique communities (Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure S2). Interestingly, five out of these eight OTUs showed a clear association with the developmental stages of S and M (Figure 4). Overall, the fungal diversity (OTU enrichment) observed in the developmental stages of CSR and SNT, respectively (Figure 4) were distinct in nature and little to no overlap was observed among the identified fungal OTUs.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Network map based on the first 100 OTUs in C. songaricum (CSR), parasitized N. tangutorum (SNT), and non-parasitized N. tangutorum (NT) based on ITS2 region. A1, B1, C1, D1, and E1 represented CSR from five developmental stages: Tubercle, Sprouting, Unearthing, Maturing, and Atrophy stage; A2, B2, C2, D2, and E2 represent SNT samples corresponding to the five stages of CSR development, respectively; Control, represents NT in hypothetical T stage. The data was analyzed by Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) and the network was drawn using the graph package in R software.

Fungal Endophytes Recovered as Seed Germination Promotors

A total of 281 fungal endophytes were isolated and cultured from surface-sterilized CSR, SNT, and NT, respectively, comprising the five different developmental stages of T to A (Supplementary Tables S1, S2). Results were classified into at least 31 genera, with their average IR being 31.9%. The most abundant fungus to be isolated was Fusarium spp. followed by its teleomorph Gibberella spp., Penicillium spp., Ilyonectria spp., Aspergillus spp., and Alternaria spp., respectively (Supplementary Tables S1, S2). The fungal dynamics that were observed in isolation experiments from the five developmental stages were consistent with those of the results obtained from high throughput sequencing (Figure 2C and Table 2).

Table 2.

Endophytic fungi with bio-activity for promotion of C. songaricum seed germination.

Isolate origin Classification GenBank No. Closest match (GenBank No.) – % seq identity Extract Seed germination rate effected by fungus
CSR in Sprouting stage Fusarium sp. KY379544 F. redolens (KU901531.1) – 100% Ferm. broth 45.00%
SNT in Sprouting stage Fusarium sp. KY379572 F. nematophilum (KU9324800.1) 100% Ferm. broth 25.00%
CSR in Maturing stage Aspergillus sp. KY379684 A. terreus (KY425727.1) – 100% Ferm. broth 0.50%
SNT in Maturing stage Clonostachys sp. KY379716 C. rosea (LT576164.1) – 100% Ferm. broth 0.50%
SNT in Atrophy stage Fusarium sp. KY379764 F. nematophilum (KX272852.1) – 100% Ferm. broth 15.00%

CSR, sample of rhizome from C. songaricum; SNT, parasitized Nitraria tangutorum; Ferm. broth, extract of fungal fermentation broth.

To examine the effect of different endophytic isolates on the growth and development of parasitic C. songaricum, fermentation broth and mycelial extract of each isolated and culturable fungus was tested for promotion of C. songaricum seed germination in vitro (Supplementary Figure S3). Results showed that the fermentation broth from the five isolates comprising the species of Fusarium redolens, Fusarium nematophilum, Aspergillus terreus, and Clonostachys rosea exhibited seed germination promotion activity in C. songaricum. As shown in Table 2 we observed that F. redolens (KY379544, from CSR in Sprouting stage) and F. nematophilum (KY379572, from SNT in Sprouting stage) showed the greatest frequency of germination efficiency, i.e., 45 and 25%, respectively (Supplementary Figure S3). The results showed that endophytic fungi participated in the root-parasitic interaction of C. songaricum with N. tangutorum, presenting evidence of their potential as target endophytic fungal spp. for seed germination enhancement and a probable strategy for conservation and cultivation of the endangered Cynomorium medicinal plant species.

Discussion

With the rapid development of high-throughput sequencing methods and bioinformatics tools, a huge number of cryptic fungi are being discovered (Yang et al., 2016). Previous estimates based on high-throughput sequencing suggest as many as 5.1 million fungal species and a significant proportion of which is estimated to be found in plant–endophyte relations (Blackwell, 2011). Recently, the use of “meta-omic” technologies such as metagenomics has helped to realize the potential of endophytes in plant-fungal interaction studies (Kaul et al., 2016). While many aspects of endophytic biology are still unknown, metagenomic approaches in identifying sequences of interacting partners is unraveling the nuances of plant–endophyte relationship. The identified sequences help exploring endophytic species distribution, community structure, lifestyles and nutrition modes, and provide objective insights into endophytic fungal richness, ecological function and fungal-mediated processes in host plant (Ottosson et al., 2015). While, an urgency to establish sustainable programs for conservation and resource utilization of medicinal plants has long been proposed (Cui et al., 2013), further studies on mechanisms and exploitation of co-existing endophytes is still largely limited. Here, in our study we aimed at understanding the diversity of fungal endophytes in one such ethnopharmacological relevant spp. of the genus Cynomorium, that forms root-parasitic associations with N. tangutorum. Previously, a pioneering study on characterization of endophytic fungal communities in 29 traditional Chinese medicinal plants had suggested a predominant occurrence of fungal endophyte species of the taxa; Alternaria, Colletotrichum, Phoma, Phomopsis, Xylariales, and mycelia sterilia (Huang et al., 2008). Further, quite interestingly to date most other fungal endophytes discovered have been shown to be the fungal species that could be obtained easily and isolated commonly in the environment, such as Gibberella spp., Fusarium spp., Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., and Penicillium spp. (Strobel and Daisy, 2003). In this study, using high-throughput sequencing we detected dominant genera/order of endophytic fungi at different distribution levels among our CSR, SNT, and NT samples (Figures 1, 2A,C and Supplementary Figure S2). Our results concur with previously reported findings that under traditional methods used in laboratory conditions only 0.1–1.0% of endophytic fungi could be obtained because of artificial selection pressure (Amann et al., 1995). However, considering the medicinal value of Cynomorium spp. in the clinic as well as in folk-medicines information on the endophytes found in the root-parasitic interactions of C. songaricum and its host N. tangutorum could be deemed invaluable.

Plant endophytic fungi are shown to originate mainly from seeds through vertical transmission or from the environment through horizontal transmission (Christian et al., 2016; Guo et al., 2017). However, studies on endophytic fungal distribution in parasitic plants and its host are more complicated, for fungal colonization and movement within the two plants can either be facilitated via xylem tubes (Compant et al., 2010) or through apoplasts, intercellular space (Maheshwari et al., 2013). For example, it was found that the mistletoe Phoradendron perrottettii and its host tree Tapirira guianensis shared some common endophyte species while still maintaining distinct communities (de Abreu et al., 2010). Similarly, in our studies (Figure 2A) we found that CSR and its host SNT shared much more OTUs (76 in total) for endophytic fungi, compared to CSR and NT (4 in total). The reason for this observed discrepancy may be that C. songaricum is succulent while N. tangutorum is a ligneous plant, which may lead to the damage of C. songaricum tissue by sand more easily as compared to N. tangutorum. Thus, it can be hypothesized that the fungal invasion and colonization to C. songaricum is easier than N. tangutorum. This may probably explain the observed differences in the number of unique fungi in CSR (419) being more than those in SNT (290) (Figures 2A,C). Further, we also found that NT and SNT together shared the maximum numbers (1120) of endophytic fungi, which we believe supports the notion of species specificity and selective specificity existing between endophytes and their hosts (Rai and Agarkar, 2016). On the other hand, the parasitic connection in CSR and SNT would lead to chemical exchange, and further influence selection and/or fungal inhibition. Thus, the genetic distance of fungal communities from SNT intermediated between CSR and NT, however, results suggest that the fungal assemblages are more associative toward CSR than NT (Figure 2B).

In one life cycle, C. songaricum grows originating from a tubercle (about several millimeters) to an exuberant organism (about 0.5 m) spanning the T to A developmental stage, then they shrink gradually toward the end of the year. With the growth of root tips or other tissue in sand, more and more environmental fungi would invade and colonize plants via the tissue that is injured by sand particles. Thus, it can be speculated that the amount of endophytic fungi increases from T to U developmental stage with the rising desert temperatures (Figure 3). After the peak (U stage), the fungal number decreased until to A stage (Kruh et al., 2017). The invaded fungi may be subjected to selection pressure from the host plants (Nikolov et al., 2014; Rai and Agarkar, 2016), and only part of them capable of adapting to the host internal environment, may survive and multiply in the host plants (Huang et al., 2017). Hence, the longer the plants grow, the more is the shared endophytic fungi among CSR, SNT, and NT (Figure 3). On the other hand, because of exchange of fungi through parasitic connections (Kruh et al., 2017), the shared fungi between CSR and SNT were more than that between CSR and NT in each developmental stage. This suggests a most probable co-evolution and natural selection among host species (Ambrose et al., 2014).

The role and mechanism of endophytes in parasitic interaction between C. songaricum and N. tangutorum remains largely uninvestigated, and our results provide key cues that could further be used for functional evaluation of fungal assemblages in isolation or in unison. Previous evidence indicates that products from endophytic fungi affect physiology and development of host plants (Rodriguez and Redman, 2008). For example, strigolactones produced almost exclusively from parasitized host plant, serve as essential signal molecules stimulating the germination of parasitic plant. Recent evidence that strigolactone biosynthesis can be regulated by gibberellins which were produced by endophytic Gibberella spp. and Fusarium spp. provides further opportunities for analyzing the roles of endophytic fungal assemblages (Lale and Gadre, 2010; Troncoso et al., 2010; Ito et al., 2017). Interestingly, even in our study both Gibberella spp. and Fusarium spp. were identified as the dominant fungi in parasitic C. songaricum and its host N. tangutorum. And, further analysis of relevance and function of the Fusarium spp. on the growth and development of C. songaricum was tested using in vitro axenic conditions, which suggested that the Fusarium redolens (KY379544) can serve as a target endophytic fungal species in promoting C. songaricum seed germination (Supplementary Figure S3). However, it remains to be investigated whether they are involved in the tripartite interaction of fungal endophytes with the root-parasitic plant and/or its host. While, some endophytic bacteria were also shown to possess the ability of promoting host seed germination (Shittu et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2014), studies with respect to the use of fungal endophytes as sources of medicinal host similar bioactive component (biosimilar) is only now beginning to be addressed to its full potential (Jia et al., 2016). In this study, five isolates (F. redolens KY379544, F. nematophilum KY379572, A. terreus KY379684, C. rosea KY379716, and F. nematophilum KY379764) showed the ability of promoting seed germination, which suggests that endophytic fungi may play important roles in root-parasitic plant interactions and parasitic host growth and development.

Conclusion

This study firstly demonstrates that parasitic behavior of C. songaricum on N. tangutorum could significantly affect the inhabiting distribution, growth and decline, and other plant fungal endophyte dynamics. We show that the endophytic fungal community shifts between the parasitic plant and its host, which helps one to understand the significance of such ecological relationships of parasite-endophyte-host organism(s) in tripartite associations. Some of the endophytes we isolated in this study exhibit the ability to promote C. songaricum seed germination, which concurs with previously suggested studies that endophytes could significantly influence the production and accumulation of medicinal host metabolites. Our results in the ethnopharmacological relevant Cynomorium spp., highlights the important and integral part fungal endophytes occupy in the C. songaricum’s desert ecosystem, thus playing a vital role in parasitic development and physiology. Our results provide evidence for future investigations on novel ways for improving the parasitic survival rate and production of C. songaricum, which in the long-run may aid maintenance and sustainable development of desert plant ecology.

Author Contributions

J-LC and GZ designed the research, performed the experiments, and analyzed the data. J-LC collected the samples. J-LC, VV, and GZ co-wrote the paper.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We express our great thanks to Alashan National Geological Park Service, Inner Mongolia Province, for the help in sample collection, and Dr. Veena Devi Ganeshan (The Ohio State University) for English language editing.

Funding. This research work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31670328 and 31270383) and Shaanxi Provincial University Youth Outstanding Talent Program.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00666/full#supplementary-material

References

  1. Amann R. I., Ludwig W., Schleifer K. H. (1995). Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59 143–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ambrose K. V., Koppenhöfer A. M., Belanger F. C. (2014). Horizontal gene transfer of a bacterial insect toxin gene into the Epichloë fungal symbionts of grasses. Sci. Rep. 4:5562. 10.1038/srep05562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Behie S. W., Zelisko P. M., Bidochka M. J. (2012). Endophytic insect-parasitic fungi translocate nitrogen directly from insects to plants. Science 336 1576–1577. 10.1126/science.1222289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blackwell M. (2011). The fungi: 1,2, 3 ... 5.1 million species? Am. J. Bot. 98 426–438. 10.3732/ajb.1000298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caporaso J. G., Kuczynski J., Stombaugh J., Bittinger K., Bushman F. D., Costello E. K., et al. (2010). QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7 335–336. 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chagas M. B. O., Prazeres dos Santos I., Nascimento da Silva L. C., Correia M. T. S., et al. (2017). Antimicrobial activity of cultivable endophytic fungi associated with Hancornia speciosa gomes bark. Open Microbiol. J. 11 179–188. 10.2174/1874285801711010179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen G. L., An T. Y., Jin S. W., Chen Q. (2011). Study on seed characters and vigor of Cynomorium songaricum Rupr. Seed 30 21–23. 10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2011.01.053 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen X. M., Guo S. X., Wang C. L. (2005). Effects of four endophytic fungi on the growth and polysaccharide content of Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl. Chin. Pharm. J. 40 13–16. 10.3321/j.issn:1001-2494.2005.01.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Christian N., Sullivan C., Visser N. D., Clay K. (2016). Plant host and geographic location drive endophyte community composition in the face of perturbation. Microb. Ecol. 72 621–632. 10.1007/s00248-016-0804-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Compant S., Clément C., Sessitsch A. (2010). Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42 669–678. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cui J. L., Guo T. T., Ren Z. X., Zhang N. S., Wang M. L. (2015). Diversity and antioxidant activity of culturable endophytic fungi from alpine plants of Rhodiola crenulata, R. angusta, and R. sachalinensis. PLoS One 10:e0118204. 10.1371/journal.pone.0118204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cui J. L., Wang Y. N., Jiao J., Gong Y., Wang J. H., Wang M. L. (2017). Fungal endophyte-induced salidroside and tyrosol biosynthesis combined with signal cross-talk and the mechanism of enzyme gene expression in Rhodiola crenulata. Sci. Rep. 7:12540. 10.1038/s41598-017-12895-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cui Z. H., Guo Z. Q., Miao J. H., Wang Z. W., Li Q. Q., Chai X. Y., et al. (2013). The genus Cynomorium in China: an ethnopharmacological and phytochemical review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 147 1–15. 10.1016/j.jep.2013.01.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. de Abreu L. M., Almeida A. R., Algado M. S., Pfenning L. H. (2010). Fungal endophytes associated with the mistletoe Phoradendron perrottettii and its host tree Tapirira guianensis. Mycol. Prog. 9 559–566. 10.1007/s11557-010-0663-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ding Z. S., Jiang F. S., Jin B., Xu L., Chen N. P., Lv G. Y. (2008). Study function of endophytic fungus in parasitism process of mistleto. Chin. J. Chin. Mater. Med. 33 1243–1245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dong S. L., Chen N. L., Hen N. L., Zhang Y., Li C. X., Gao H. N. (2010). Preliminary study on dormancy and germination of Cynomorium songaricum seed. Arid Zone Res. 28 655–659. 10.13866/j.azr.2011.04.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Edgar R. C., Haas B. J., Clemente J. C., Quince C., Knight R. (2011). UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27 2194–2200. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Faeth S. H., Fagan W. F. (2002). Fungal endophytes: common host plant symbionts but uncommon mutualists. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42 360–368. 10.1093/icb/42.2.360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Firáková S., Šturdiková M., Múčková M. (2007). Bioactive secondary metabolites produced by microorganisms associated with plants. Biologia 62 251–257. 10.2478/s11756-007-0044-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Guo H., Glaeser S. P., Alabid I., Imani J., Haghighi H., Kämpfer P., et al. (2017). The Abundance of endofungal bacterium Rhizobium radiobacter (syn. Agrobacterium tumefaciens) increases in its fungal host Piriformospora indica during the tripartite sebacinalean symbiosis with higher plants. Front. Microbiol. 8:629. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Guo S. X., Wang Q. Y. (2001). Character and action of good strain from Mycena dendrobii on stimulating seed germination of Gastrodia elata. Mycosystema 20 408–412. [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang W. Y., Cai Y. Z., Hyde K. D., Corke H., Sun M. (2008). Biodiversity of endophytic fungi associated with 29 traditional Chinese medicinal plants. Fungal Divers. 33 61–75. [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang Y. L., Kuang Z. Y., Deng Z. J., Zhang R., Cao L. X. (2017). Endophytic bacterial and fungal communities transmitted from cotyledons and germs in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) sprouts. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24 16458–16464. 10.1007/s11356-017-9254-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ito S., Yamagami D., Umehara M., Hanada A., Yoshida S., Sasaki Y., et al. (2017). Regulation of strigolactone biosynthesis by gibberellin signaling. Plant Physiol. 174 1250–1259. 10.1104/pp.17.00301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jia M., Chen L., Xin H. L., Zheng C. J., Rahman K., Han T., et al. (2016). A friendly relationship between endophytic fungi and medicinal plants: a systematic review. Front. Microbiol. 7:906. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kaul S., Sharma T., Khar M. K. (2016). “Omics” tools for better understanding the plant-endophyte interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 7:955. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kruh L. L., Lahav T., Abu-Nassar J., Achdari G., Salami R., Freilich S., et al. (2017). Host-parasite-bacteria triangle: the microbiome of the parasitic weed Phelipanche aegyptiaca and tomato-Solanum lycopersicum (Mill.) as a host. Front. Plant Sci. 8:269. 10.3389/fpls.2017.00269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lale G., Gadre R. (2010). Enhanced production of gibberellin A4 (GA4) by a mutant of Gibberella fujikuroi in wheat gluten medium. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37 297–306. 10.1007/s10295-009-0673-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee J. S., Oh H. A., Kwon J. Y., Jeong M. H., Lee J. S. (2013). The effects of Cynomorium songaricum on the reproductive activity in male golden hamsters. Dev. Reprod. 17 37–43. 10.12717/DR.2013.17.1.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Luo G. H., Wang J., Yan X., Zhang Y., Zhang G. X., Wang J. Q. (2013). Differences of Cynomorium songaricum seed quality and mutual parasitism in different host plants. Chin. J. Chin. Mater. Med. 38 3432–3437. 10.4268/cjcmm20132005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Magoč T., Salzberg S. L. (2011). FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27 2957–2963. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Maheshwari D. K., Meenu S., Abhinav A. (2013). Bacteria in Agrobiology: Crop Productivity. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar]
  33. Martin L. L., Ross Friedman C. M., Phililips L. A. (2012). Fungal endophytes of the obligate parasitic dwarf mistletoe Arceuthobium americanum (Santalaceae) act antagonistically in vitro against the native fungal pathogen Cladosporium (Davidiellaceae) of their host. Am. J. Bot. 99 2027–2034. 10.3732/ajb.1200189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nikolov L. A., Tomlinson P. B., Manickam S., Endress P. K., Kramer E. M., Davis C. C. (2014). Holoparasitic rafflesiaceae possess the most reduced endophytes and yet give rise to the world’s largest flowers. Ann. Bot. 114 233–242. 10.1093/aob/mcu114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nisa H., Kamili A. N., Nawchoo I. A., Shafi S., Shameem N., Bandh S. A. (2015). Fungal endophytes as prolific source of phytochemicals and other bioactive natural products: a review. Microb. Pathog. 82 50–59. 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ottosson E., Kubartová A., Edman M., Jönsson M., Lindhe A., Stenlid J., et al. (2015). Diverse ecological roles within fungal communities in decomposing logs of Picea abies. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 91:fiv012. 10.1093/femsec/fiv012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rai M., Agarkar G. (2016). Plant-fungal interactions: what triggers the fungi to switch among lifestyles? Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 42 428–438. 10.3109/1040841X.2014.958052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ran X., Zhang G., Li S., Wang J. (2017). Characterization and antitumor activity of camptothecin from endophytic fungus Fusarium solani isolated from Camptotheca acuminate. Afr. Health Sci. 17 566–574. 10.4314/ahs.v17i2.34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Reeder J., Knight R. (2010). Rapidly denoising pyrosequencing amplicon reads by exploiting rank-abundance distributions. Nat. Methods 7 668–669. 10.1038/nmeth0910-668b [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rodriguez R., Redman R. (2008). More than 400 million years of evolution and some plants still can’t make it on their own: plant stress tolerance via fungal symbiosis. J. Exp. Bot. 59 1109–1114. 10.1093/jxb/erm342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schloss P. D., Westcott S. L., Ryabin T., Hall J. R., Hartmann M., Hollister E. B., et al. (2009). Introducing mother: open-source, plat independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. App. Environ. Microbiol. 75 7537–7541. 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Shittu H. O., Castroverde D. C. M., Nazar R. N., Robb J. (2009). Plant endophyte interplay protects tomato against a virulent Verticillium. Planta 229 415–426. 10.1007/s00425-008-0840-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Strobel G., Daisy B. (2003). Bioprospecting for microbial endophytes and their natural products. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67 491–502. 10.1128/MMBR.67.4.491-502.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Suryanarayanan T. S., Senthilarasu G., Muruganandam V. (2000). Endophytic fungi from Cuscuta reflexa and its host plants. Fungal Divers. 4 117–123. [Google Scholar]
  45. Teixeira-Costa L., Ceccantini G. C. T. (2016). Aligning microtomography analysis with traditional anatomy for 3D understanding of the host-parasite interface-Phoradendron spp. case study. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1340. 10.3389/fpls.2016.01340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Troncoso C., González X., Bömke C., Tudzynski B., Gong F., Hedden P., et al. (2010). Gibberellin biosynthesis and gibberellin oxidase activities in Fusarium sacchari, Fusarium konzum and Fusarium subglutinans strains. Phytochemistry 71 1322–1331. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wan W. H., Chen J. R. (2000). Cynomoriaceae. In: Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Beijing: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang Q., Garrity G. M., Tiedje J. M., Cole J. R. (2007). Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73 5261–5267. 10.1128/AEM.00062-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wani Z. A., Ashraf N., Mohiuddin T., Riyaz-Ui-Hassan S. (2015). Plant-endophyte symbiosis, an ecological perspective. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99 2955–2965. 10.1007/s00253-015-6487-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu J. T., Guo S. X. (1989). Nutrition for seed germination of Gastrodia elata by Mycena osmundicola. Mycosystema 8 221–226. [Google Scholar]
  51. Xu M., Sheng J., Chen L., Men Y., Gan L., Guo S., et al. (2014). Bacterial community compositions of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) seeds plant growth promoting activity of ACC deaminase producing Bacillus subtilis (HYT-12-1) on tomato seedlings. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30 835–845. 10.1007/s11274-013-1486-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang T., Sun H., Shen C. C., Chu H. Y. (2016). Fungal assemblages in different habitats in an Erman’s birch forest. Front. Microbiol. 7:1368 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang H. W., Song Y. C., Tan R. X. (2006). Biology and chemistry of endophytes. Nat. Prod. Rep. 23 753–771. 10.1039/b609472b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhou S. L., Zhen Y. S., Wu Z. Y., Chen S. L. (2014). Endophytic fungi associated with Macrosolen tricolor and its host Camellia oleifera. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30 1775–1784. 10.1007/s11274-014-1600-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES