Abstract
Objectives
Oncogenic potential of Notch signaling and its cooperation with other factors to affect proliferation are widely established. Notch exhibits a cooperative effect with loss of a cell polarity gene, scribble to induce neoplastic overgrowth. Oncogenic Ras also show cooperative effect with loss of cell polarity genes such as scribble (scrib), lethal giant larvae (lgl) and discs large to induce neoplastic overgrowth and invasion. Our study aims at assessing the cooperation of activated Notch with loss of function of lgl in tumor overgrowth, and the mode of JNK signaling activation in this context.
Results
In the present study, we use Drosophila as an in vivo model to show the synergy between activated Notch (Nact) and loss of function of lgl (lgl-IR) in tumor progression. Coexpression of Nact and lgl-IR results in massive tumor overgrowth and displays hallmarks of cancer, such as MMP1 upregulation and loss of epithelial integrity. We further show activation of JNK signaling and upregulation of its receptor, Grindelwald in Nact/lgl-IR tumor. In contrast to previously described Notchact/scrib−/− tumor, our experiments in Nact/lgl-IR tumor showed the presence of dying cells along with tumorous overgrowth.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3350-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Notch, lgl, Drosophila, Tumor overgrowth, JNK signaling, Cell death
Introduction
In the past decade, a keen interest has been shown to explore the oncogenic cooperation with loss of cell polarity in tumor progression and malignancy. Studies in Drosophila have revealed that the oncogenic form of Ras cooperates with loss of tumor suppressors, namely scrib, lgl and dlg to cause tumor cell invasion [1, 2]. The oncogenic form of Notch has also shown to cooperate with scrib−/− to induce neoplastic overgrowth [2]. The loss-of-function mutation of Scribble complex genes (scrib, lgl and dlg) results in disruption of epithelial integrity followed by neoplastic tissue hyperproliferation [3–5]. However, the tumor formation caused by loss of scrib, lgl and dlg has been found to be restricted by the compensatory JNK mediated apoptosis [2, 6–8]. Among the Scrib complex genes, lgl was the first neoplastic tumor suppressor gene described in Drosophila [9]. The phenotypes of lgl mutant tissues show close similarity with that of the human epithelial cancers [10–12]. Although it has been shown that Notch cooperates with scrib−/− to induce neoplastic growth, it is still unknown whether Notch works in the same way with loss-of-function of lgl also. Recently, Lgl has been shown to regulate Notch signaling via endocytosis [13]. However, it gives no substantial evidence on coupling of lgl-Notch effect on tumorigenesis. In the present study, we checked the effect of a tumor suppressor gene mutation, lgl, in activated Notch background, and found that lgl downregulation synergizes with activated Notch to induce overgrowth and migratory behavior. Here, we show that Nact/lgl-IR tissues display the hallmarks of tumor overgrowth. Moreover, our study revealed that the effect of Nact/lgl-IR tumor is mediated by the activation of JNK signaling through the upregulation of its receptor, Grindelwald.
Main text
Methods
Detailed description of methods used in this study is provided in Additional file 1.
Results
Oncogenic Notch synergizes with RNAi mediated downregulation of lgl to promote tissue overgrowth
Coexpression of both lgl-IR and Notchact in the Drosophila eye discs using ey-GAL4 dramatically induced overgrowth (Fig. 1d, d″) as compared to that of only Nact overexpressed (Fig. 1b, b″) or only lgl-IR overexpressed (Fig. 1c, c″) eye discs. To further describe the phenotype of Nact/lgl-IR tumor, expression of Matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) was monitored. MMPs are enzymes with clear association to tumor cell invasion and cancer progression [14, 15]. Coexpression of Notchact and lgl-IR resulted in massive upregulation of MMP1 expression throughout the entire eye disc (Fig. 1d′) as compared to that of only Nact or only lgl-IR (Fig. 1b′, c′). Further, we extended our observation into the brain since ey-GAL is mildly expressed in the brain also. Except endogenous expression, no MMP1 activation was observed in the ey-GAL4 driven lgl-IR (Fig. 1g′) and Nact larval brain (Fig. 1f′). In case of Notchact/lgl-IR larval brain, excessive amount of GFP marked cells with enhanced MMP1 expression was observed in the optic lobes (Fig. 1h, h′). The increment in GFP and MMP1 expression was also found in the ventral nerve cord (VNC) of Notchact/lgl-IR larval brain (Fig. 1h, h′ marked with arrows). This indicates that the weak expression of ey-GAL4 in VNC is also inducing MMP1 expression in Notchact/lgl-IR tissue. When we quantified the amount of GFP in upper region of VNC, a significant increment in the amount of GFP in Notchact/lgl-IR was found as compared to that of the controls (Additional file 2: Figure S1a). We also quantified the presence of MMP1 in the VNC of Notchact/lgl-IR (Additional file 2: Figure S1b), which clearly shows a significant increase as compared to that of the controls. Moreover, transcript levels of mmp1 in the cephalic complex were also found to be upregulated in Notchact/lgl-IR tumor as compared to that of the controls (Additional file 2: Figure S1c).
In order to examine the cytoskeleton network and cell–cell adhesion, we marked the tissues with phalloidin and adherens junction marker proteins, Armadillo (Arm) and Cadherin (DE-Cad). The F-actin network marked by phalloidin revealed a defective actin cytoskeleton network in Nact/lgl-IR tumor tissues compared to that of controls (Additional file 3: Figure S2). In the same way, the localization of DE-Cad and Arm were also deregulated in Nact/lgl-IR tumorous eye discs (Additional file 4: Figure S3a–d, e–h). We, next, determined if neuronal differentiation was defective in Nact/lgl-IR tumor using a neuronal marker, Elav that marks the differentiated neurons in eye disc and brain. Remarkably, coexpression of Nact and lgl-IR led to severe loss of Elav positive cells in the eye disc and abnormal expression of Elav in the optic lobes indicating an impaired neuronal differentiation (Additional file 4: Figure S3i–l, m–p).
In parallel, we also used dominant-negative version of Notch to see the effect of depletion of Notch signaling on lgl-IR tumors. Previously, expression of mamDN in lgl− tissues partially rescued the lgl− mosaic adult eye phenotype [13]. Our analysis also found that reduction of Notch signaling partially rescued the phenotypes of lgl loss-of-function flies (Additional file 5: Figure S4). Thus, our analysis support the notion that the lgl loss-of-function wing phenotype is dependent on elevated Notch signaling, consistent with the previous study [13].
Involvement of JNK pathway in Nact/lgl-IR tumor
Previous studies in Drosophila have revealed that oncogenic Ras along with loss of lgl or scrib or dlg induces JNK signaling, which is crucial for tumor invasion [7, 16]. This prompted us to check the expression of Puckered (puc), a transcriptional target of JNK signaling and widely used to check the activation of JNK signaling. An enhancer trap allele, puc-LacZ [17] was used to monitor the activation of JNK signaling. Coexpression of both Nact and lgl-IR resulted in intense upregulation of puc throughout the wing disc (Fig. 2d), indicating the activation of JNK signaling in Nact/lgl-IR tumor. We also observed a significant increase in size of the wing disc in Nact and lgl-IR coexpressed condition compared to that of the wild-type, only Nact, and only lgl-IR wing discs (Fig. 2i).
To check the mode of activation of JNK signaling, we examined the transcript level expression of ligand eiger (egr), and its receptor wengen (wgn), in Nact/lgl-IR tumor. egr and wgn transcript levels were found to be depleted in case of Nact/lgl-IR tumor as compared to that of the controls (Fig. 2j). Recently, another member in tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, Grindelwald (Grnd), found to be associated with loss of cell polarity and neoplastic growth [18]. Interestingly, a significant upregulation of grnd transcripts in Nact/lgl-IR tumor was found, when compared to that of the wild-type, only Nact and only lgl-IR tissues (Fig. 2j). We went on to check the protein level expression of Egr in Nact/lgl-IR tumors. Immunostaining with anti-Egr antibody [19] revealed that there is no change in the level of Egr protein expression in Nact/lgl-IR tumor (Fig. 2h) as compared to that of the wild-type, only Nact and only lgl-IR tissues (Fig. 2e–g). As Egr is known to be also expressed by the tumor-associated hemocytes, leading to signaling activation [20], these immune cells may be in this case responsible for Grnd activation, but their poor adhesion to the tumor tissue may make them escape Immunofluorescence detection.
To further confirm the involvement of JNK signaling as a downstream event of Nact/lgl-IR cooperation, we blocked JNK signaling in Nact/lgl-IR tumor, and checked whether blocking JNK could affect the Nact/lgl-IR tumor. The massive upregulation of MMP1 in Nact/lgl-IR tumor (Additional file 6: Figure S5a) was drastically suppressed, when bsk-DN (a dominant negative allele of Drosophila JNK gene, basket) was expressed in the background (Additional file 6: Figure S5b). In addition, coexpression of bsk-DN with Nact; lgl-IR resulted in a reduced wing disc size as compared to Nact/lgl-IR overexpressed wing disc (Additional file 6: Figure S5c). These results indicate that JNK signaling may be involved in the tumorous overgrowth of Nact/lgl-IR tissues.
Nact/lgl-IR tumor induces cell death
Eluding apoptosis is considered as one of the acquired capabilities of many types of cancer; however, studies also explain that elevated oncogenic signaling induces apoptosis or senescence [21]. When we checked the status of cell death in Nact/lgl-IR tumor, we observed a significant amount of acridine orange (Compare Fig. 3d with a–c) and caspase positive cells (Compare Fig. 3i with f–h) indicating severe cell death. Since loss of lgl in a tissue known to induce cell competition to remove the unfit cells [22], dying cells in Nact/lgl-IR tissue could be an indication of cell competition. To check the effect of cell death on overgrowth and MMP1 expression, we blocked cell death by expressing a caspase inhibitor, p35 (Fig. 3e, j). It was found that blocking cell death in Nact/lgl-IR overexpressed condition did not obstruct MMP1 expression (Fig. 3o). Coexpression of p35 with Nact/lgl-IR resulted in an increased wing disc size as compared to Nact/lgl-IR overexpressed wing disc (Fig. 3r). As the caspase inhibitor, p35 is known to block cell death [23], the increase in the tissue size is expected since blocking cell death in Nact/lgl-IR tumor allowed more cells to overgrow that, in turn, increased the disc size.
Discussion
In the present study, we unveil a cooperation of Notch with RNAi-mediated downregulation of a polarity cum tumor suppressor gene, lgl to promote tumor overgrowth. Our data, presented here, illustrate that coexpression of Nact and lgl-IR in Drosophila eye disc results in overgrowth, loss of positional clues and upregulation of MMP1 expression, which is less prevalent in only Nact overexpression or only lgl-IR overexpression. Earlier the loss of polarity gene scribble found to cooperate with Notch signaling to promote neoplastic overgrowth [2]. Another two independent studies of similar context show that oncogenic Ras cooperates with loss of cell polarity genes (lgl, scrib, dlg) to induce metastasis and secondary tumor formation at distant sites [7, 14]. Interestingly, we found that Notch synergizes with loss of lgl to promote tumorous overgrowth and elevated expression of MMP1, and inhibiting Notch signaling rescues the defects caused by loss of lgl. It indicates the potential function of Notch signaling during lgl mediated tumor development. Our data also show distorted epithelial integrity in Nact/lgl-IR tumor that point towards epithelial to mesenchymal transition, where tightly joined epithelial cells with regularly spaced cell–cell junctions convert to mesenchymal cells which are of irregular shape without tight intracellular adhesion [24].
Further, we found upregulation of JNK signaling and its receptor Grindelwald in Nact/lgl-IR tumor. Two previous studies have shown that Notch cooperates with two different proteins to induce proliferation and metastasis by the activation of JNK signaling in ligand-dependent and -independent manner [25, 26]. In case of Nact/lgl-IR tumor, we show that the transcript levels of egr (ligand) and wgn (receptor) were not upregulated, whereas a significant upregulation of grnd transcripts in the Nact/lgl-IR tumor was observed. Earlier the active form of Grnd has shown to activate JNK signaling in vivo [18]. Thus, in case of Nact/lgl-IR tumor, JNK signaling might get activated through Grindelwald. Previously, it has been shown that JNK signaling can initiate tumor initiation and growth in Eiger-independent manner also [27].
Another most important hallmark of almost all types of cancer is the ability to evade apoptosis that, in turn, helps tumor cell population to increase in number [21]. In other similar tumor models such as Rasv12/dlg−/−, dying cells of dlg−/− clones evade apoptosis in presence of oncogenic Ras, where JNK signaling switches its role from proapoptotic to progrowth [7]. In contrast, Ras/scrib−/− and Ras/lgl−/−tumors were reported to show apoptosis [22, 28]. However, Notch/scrib−/− tumor did not show the presence of apoptosis [29]. In our case, Nact/lgl-IR tumor resulted in severe apoptosis along with strong overgrowth and MMP1 expression. These dying cells in Nact/lgl-IR tumor might be the indication of cell competition as there is a strong proliferation and overgrowth. In case of Nact/scrib−/− tumor, Notch is giving growth advantage to scrib−/− tissues by preventing cell death. However, in case of Nact/lgl-IR wing discs, activation of Notch failed to restrict the cell death caused by loss of lgl; rather its activation induces further cell death. These differences indicate that although oncogenic cooperation with loss of cell polarity results in similar tumor cell migration but certain property like cell death occurs depending on the context.
Limitations
The present study is not the first one to show the cooperation between Notch and loss of cell polarity genes. Activated Notch is known to cooperate with another cell polarity gene, scribble, to induce neoplastic overgrowth.
In the present study, experiments were performed using RNAi line of lgl, but not with the lgl loss-of-function mutants.
Additional files
Authors’ contributions
AM and MSP involved in conception and design of the study. MSP performed the experiments, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. DD involved in critically revising the original draft. AS and MM were involved in analysis and interpretation of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Spyros Artavanis-Tsakonas, Estee Kurant, Konrad Basler and the Bloomington Stock Center for fly stocks. Some of the antibodies used in this work were obtained from DSHB. Confocal microscopy and Real-time PCR facility at DBT-BHU-ISLS are duly acknowledged.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
Data available on request from the corresponding author.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was supported by funds from DBT, India (BT/PR14082/BRB/10/806/2010 and BT/PR14080/BRB/10/805/2010) and UGC-UPE, BHU to AM and MM. MSP was supported by the fellowship from JNMF while AS and DD were supported by CSIR, Government of India.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abbreviations
- scrib
scribble
- lgl
lethal giant larvae
- dlg
discs large
- Nact
activated Notch
- lgl-IR
lgl-RNAi
- MMP1
matrix metalloproteinase
- VNC
ventran nerve cord
- ey-GAL4
eyeless GAL4
- Arm
armadillo
- DE-Cad
Drosophila E-Cadherin
- Notch-DN
Notch dominant negative
- puc
puckered
- egr
eiger
- wgn
wengen
- grnd
grindelwald
- bsk-DN
basket-dominant negative
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3350-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Contributor Information
Maimuna Sali Paul, Email: maimunasid.sp@gmail.com.
Ankita Singh, Email: ankita.mhg.bhu10@gmail.com.
Debdeep Dutta, Email: debdeep.brc@gmail.com.
Mousumi Mutsuddi, Phone: 91-542-6702492, Email: mousumi@bhu.ac.in, Email: mousumi_mutsuddi@yahoo.com.
Ashim Mukherjee, Phone: 91-542-6702490, Email: amukherjee@bhu.ac.in, Email: ashim04@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Pagliarini AR, Xu T. A genetic screen in Drosophila for metastatic behavior. Science. 2003;302:1227–1231. doi: 10.1126/science.1088474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brumby AM, Richardson HE. scribble mutants cooperate with oncogenic Ras or Notch to cause neoplastic overgrowth in Drosophila. EMBO J. 2003;22:5769–5779. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gateff E, Schneiderman HA. Developmental studies of a new mutant of Drosophila melanogaster: lethal malignant brain tumor (l(2)gl 4) Am Zool. 1967;7:760. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Stewart M, Murphy C, Fristrom JW. The recovery and preliminary characterization of X chromosome mutants affecting imaginal discs of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Bio. 1972;1927:71–83. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(72)90113-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bilder D, Perrimon N. Localization of apical epithelial determinants by the basolateral PDZ protein Scribble. Nature. 2000;403:676–680. doi: 10.1038/35001108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Uhlirova M, Jasper H, Bohmann D. Non-cell-autonomous induction of tissue overgrowth by JNK/Ras cooperation in a Drosophila tumor model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:13123–13128. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504170102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Igaki T, Pagliarini RA, Xu T. Loss of cell polarity drives tumor growth and invasion through JNK activation in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1139–1146. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Froldi F, Ziosi M, Garoia F, Pession A, Grzeschik AN, Bellosta P, et al. Therlethal giant larvae tumour suppressor mutation requires dMyc oncoprotein to promote clonal malignancy. BMC Biol. 2010;8:1–16. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-8-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gateff E. The genetics and epigenetics of neoplasms in Drosophila. Biol Rev. 1978;53:123–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1978.tb00994.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Froldi F, Ziosi M, Tomba G, Parisi F, Garoia F, Pession A, et al. Drosophila lethal giant larvae neoplastic mutant as a genetic tool for cancer modeling. Curr Genom. 2008;9:147–154. doi: 10.2174/138920208784340786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grifoni D, Sollazzo M, Fontana E, Froldi F, Pession A. Multiple strategies of oxygen supplies in Drosophila malignancies identify trichogenesis as a novel cancer hallmark. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9061. doi: 10.1038/srep09061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Calleja M, Morata G, Casanova J. Tumorogenic properties of Drosophila epithelial cells mutant for lethal giant larvae. Dev Dyn. 2016;245:834–843. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.24420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Parsons LM, Portela M, Grzeschik NA, Richardson HE. Lgl regulates Notch signaling via endocytosis, independently of the apical aPKC-Par6-Baz polarity complex. Curr Biol. 2014;24:2073–2084. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Uhlirova M, Bohmann D. JNK and Fos-regulated Mmp1 expression cooperates with Ras to induce invasive tumors in Drosophila. EMBO J. 2006;25:5294–5304. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.McCawley LJ, Matrisian LM. Matrix metalloproteinases: multifunctional contributors to tumor progression. Mol Med Today. 2000;6:149–156. doi: 10.1016/S1357-4310(00)01686-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Leong GR, Goulding KR, Amin N, Richardson HE, Brumby AE. scribble mutants promote aPKC and JNK-dependent epithelial neoplasia independently of Crumbs. BMC Biol. 2009 doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-7-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shklover J, Mishnaevski K, Levy-Adam F, Kurant E. JNK pathway activation is able to synchronize neuronal death and glial phagocytosis in Drosophila. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1649. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Andersen SD, Colombani J, Palmerini V, Chakrabandhu K, Boone E, Rothlisberger M, et al. The Drosophila TNF receptor Grindelwald couples loss of cell polarity and neoplastic overgrowth. Nature. 2015;522:482–486. doi: 10.1038/nature14298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Moreno E, Yan M, Basler K. Evolution of TNF signaling mechanisms: JNK dependent apoptosis triggered by Eiger, the Drosophila homologue of the TNF superfamily. Curr Biol. 2002;12:1263–1268. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00954-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cordero BJ, Macagno PJ, Stefanatos KR, Strathdee EK, Cagan LR, Vidal M. Oncogenic Ras diverts a host TNF tumor suppressor activity into tumor promoter. Dev Cell. 2010;8:999–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Menéndez J, Pérez-Garijo A, Calleja M, Morata G. A tumor-suppressing mechanism in Drosophila involving cell competition and the Hippo pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:14651–14656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009376107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Meier P, Silke J, Leevers SJ, Evan GI. The Drosophila caspase DRONC is regulated by DIAP1. EMBO J. 2000;19:598–611. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.4.598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee MJ, Dedhar S, Kalluri R, Thompson WE. The epithelial–mesenchymal transition: new insights in signaling, development, and disease. J Cell Biol. 2006;172:973–981. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200601018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pallavi SK, Ho MD, Hicks C, Miele L, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. Notch and Mef2 synergize to promote proliferation and metastasis through JNK signal activation in Drosophila. EMBO J. 2012;31:2895–2907. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ho MD, Pallavi SK, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. The Notch-mediated hyperplasia circuitry in Drosophila reveals a Src-JNK signaling axis. eLife. 2015;4:e05996. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Muzzopappa M, Murcia L, Milan M. Feedback amplification loop drives malignant growth in epithelial tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E7291–E7300. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701791114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kulshammer E, Uhlirova M. The actin cross-linker filamin/cheerio mediates tumor malignancy downstream of JNK signaling. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:927–938. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Doggett K, Turkel N, Willoughby LF, Ellul J, Murray MJ, Richardson HE, et al. BTB-zinc finger oncogenes are required for Ras and Notch-driven tumorigenesis in Drosophila. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0132987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data available on request from the corresponding author.