Skip to main content
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology logoLink to Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
editorial
. 2017 Nov 27;5(2):167–168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.11.002

Formation of Giant Lysosome in Neonatal Ileal Enterocytes Requires Endotubin

Xiao Zhang 1, Nan Gao 1,∗
PMCID: PMC5904043  PMID: 29693046

Enterocyte maturation involves the development of a highly sophisticated brush border, tight junctions, and an intracellular membrane network pivotal for the intestinal barrier and absorptive functions. Genetic or environmental factors that disrupt the enterocyte’s proper development can severely impact growth and survival. Interestingly, the developing enterocytes in the ileum of neonates have a transient but distinct morphologic feature: the presence of giant lysosomes in the subapical cytoplasmic region.1 These enlarged endocytic compartments emerge at late gestation and persist through the suckling period, with a proposed function for degrading endocytosed milk products during the neonatal stage. It was postulated that the formation of these giant lysosomes might result from fusion of multiple apical lysosomes, however, the molecular mechanism contributing to the development of these highly specialized endocytic membrane structures has been unclear.

In this issue, Cox et al2 investigated the in vivo contribution of a scaffold protein, endotubin (EDTB), to the enterocyte development in neonatal mouse ileum. By using both a conditional gene ablation model in mice and a CRISPR-Cas9–edited EDTB-deficient Caco2 cell line, the Cox et al provided convincing evidence to support the conclusion that EDTB, as a component found in the apical endocytic complex (AEC), plays a critical role in the proper morphogenesis of neonatal enterocytes. Inducible removal of EDTB at late gestation in mouse intestinal epithelia resulted in a disrupted formation of the characteristic giant lysosomes as well as the AEC. The EDTB-deficient epithelia also showed a reduction of tight junction proteins, a previously described phenotype by the same group,3 that was consistent with disrupted membrane trafficking. In addition, loss of EDTB occasionally caused microvillus defects that resembled some features of the microvillus inclusion diseases. These abnormalities appeared to be accompanied by disorganization of apical membrane proteins, an observation that bears similarities to the cellular defects reported for enterocytes lacking Myo5b,4 Syntaxin 3,5 Rab8a,6 Rab11a,7 or Cdc42.8, 9 The study collectively suggested that EDTB contributes to the development of multiple aspects of ileal enterocytes, potentially through coordinating several endocytic processes (eg, endosomal maturation, targeting, and fusion).

However, at the molecular level it remains unclear how EDTB engages in the diverse array of endocytic events related to apical and basolateral protein sorting, lysosome formation from AEC, and its maintenance. Future elucidation of the EDTB-associated protein partners in the giant lysosomes or in AECs may shed lights on its functional contribution toward the evolution of these compartments. In addition to endocytic trafficking, whether EDTB also directly controls the delivery of apical membrane to brush border in developing enterocytes also may be interesting for further investigation. EDTB is highly expressed in ileal enterocytes at late embryonic and neonatal stages. Its level decreases by half in postweaning mice. How the level of EDTB is up-regulated and down-regulated at transcriptional or post-translational levels in the developing ileum is important to follow up. Such information may be useful for understanding the developmental signals that control the spatial and temporal induction of distinct endocytic structures in the gastrointestinal tract during a specific developmental window. Knowledge gained about the molecular evolution and adaptation of endocytic compartments may be harnessed to modulate the endocytic states of enterocytes or in other cell types. The study by Cox et al on EDTB opens a door to beginning to understand the intracellular network that controls the dynamic organization of endocytic membrane compartments in development and disease.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest The authors disclose no conflicts.

Funding This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant DK102934, Research Scholar grant (RSG-15-060-01-TBE) from the American Cancer Society, and an Initiative for Multidisciplinary Research Teams award from Rutgers University.

References

  • 1.Wilson J.M., Whitney J.A., Neutra M.R. Biogenesis of the apical endosome-lysosome complex during differentiation of absorptive epithelial cells in rat ileum. J Cell Sci. 1991;100:133–143. doi: 10.1242/jcs.100.1.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cox C.M., Lu R., Salcin K., Wilson J.M. The endosomal protein endotubin is required for enterocyte differentiation. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;5:145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McCarter S.D., Johnson D.L., Kitt K.N., Donohue C., Adams A., Wilson J.M. Regulation of tight junction assembly and epithelial polarity by a resident protein of apical endosomes. Traffic. 2010;11:856–866. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01052.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Weis V.G., Knowles B.C., Choi E., Goldstein A.E., Williams J.A., Manning E.H., Rolant J.T., Lapierre L.A., Goldenring J.R. Loss of MYO5B in mice recapitulates microvillus inclusion disease and reveals an apical trafficking pathway distinct to neonatal duodenum. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2:131–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2015.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wiegerinck C.L., Janecke A.R., Schneeberger K., Vogel G.F., van Haaften-Visser D.Y., Escher J.C., Adam R., Ce Thoni, Pfaller K., Jordan A.J., Weis C.A., Nijman I.J., Monroe G.R., van Hasselt P.M., Cutz E., Klumperman J., Clevers H., Nieuwenhuis E.E., Houwen R.H., van Haaften G., Hess M.W., Huber L.A., Stapelbroek J.M., Muller T., Middendorp S. Loss of syntaxin 3 causes variant microvillus inclusion disease. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:65–68 e10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sato T., Mushiake S., Kato Y., Sato K., Sato M., Takeda N., Ozono K., Miki K., Kubo Y., Tsuji A., Harada R., Harada A. The Rab8 GTPase regulates apical protein localization in intestinal cells. Nature. 2007;448:366–369. doi: 10.1038/nature05929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Knowles B.C., Weis V.G., Yu S., Roland J.T., Williams J.A., Alvarado G.S., Lapierre L.A., Shub M.D., Gao N., Goldenring J.R. Rab11a regulates syntaxin 3 localization and microvillus assembly in enterocytes. J Cell Sci. 2015;128:1617–1626. doi: 10.1242/jcs.163303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sakamori R., Das S., Yu S., Feng S., Stypulkowski E., Guan Y., Douard V., Tang W., Ferraris R.P., Harada A., Brakebusch C., Guo W., Gao N. Cdc42 and Rab8a are critical for intestinal stem cell division, survival, and differentiation in mice. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:1052–1065. doi: 10.1172/JCI60282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang X., Gao N. RAB and RHO GTPases regulate intestinal crypt cell homeostasis and enterocyte function. Small GTPases. 2016;7:59–64. doi: 10.1080/21541248.2016.1159274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES