Abstract
Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) is a common illness influencing childbearing women worldwide. Most women suffering from RVVC develop infection without specified risk factors. Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is an important component of innate immune defense against Candida infection. Innate immunity gene mutations and polymorphisms have been suggested to play a role in susceptibility to RVVC. This study aimed to investigate the association between MBL 2 gene exon 1 codon 54 polymorphism and susceptibility to RVVC in childbearing women. Whole blood and serum samples were obtained from 59 RVVC cases and 59 controls. MBL serum level was measured by enzyme-linked immune-sorbent assay (ELISA). MBL2 exon 1 codon 54 polymorphism was determined by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). It was shown that MBL serum level was nonsignificantly different between RVVC cases and controls. The risk of RVVC was 3 times higher in those carrying MBL2 exon 1 codon 54 variant allele (B). It could be concluded that the carrying of MBL2 exon 1 codon 54 variant allele (B) was shown to be a risk factor for RVVC in childbearing women.
1. Introduction
Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is the second most common vaginal infection after bacterial vaginosis [1]. It is diagnosed in up to 40% of women with vaginal complaints in the primary care setting [2–4]. Nevertheless, it was estimated that 3 out of 4 women were likely to endure at least one episode of VVC in their lifetime. Moreover, about 5−10% of those women were suffering from recurrent infections [5]. Recurrent VVC (RVVC) is a multifactorial illness with possible underlying risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, antibiotic use, or pregnancy, but most of women with RVVC develop infection without identifiable risk factors [4]. RVVC can be defined as four episodes or at least three episodes unrelated to antibiotic therapy and occurring within one year [6]. The question about what factors determine which women experience transition from infrequent VVC to RVVC has not been resolved yet [7, 8]. Therefore, different mutations and polymorphisms in innate immune genes can alter the vaginal mucosal defense mechanisms against Candida species [9].
Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is an important component of the innate immune system. MBL is originally synthesized in the liver, circulates throughout the body, and has the ability to identify a broad range of pathogens [10]. MBL is capable of binding to mannan fraction of Candida cell wall, activating complement pathway, and hence, might reduce systemic infections by Candida spp. and in turn vaginal colonization [11]. Furthermore, macrophages and dendritic cells express receptors that can recognize MBL, facilitating opsonization of microorganisms with bound MBL on their surface [12, 13].
Mannose-binding lectin is a large macromolecule that has a bouquet-like structure. The basic structural subunit of MBL is a homotrimer of MBL polypeptides, entwined in a triple helix. Each single polypeptide chain has four domains: (1) a 21-amino acid N-terminal cysteine-rich region involved in oligomerization, (2) a 59-amino acid collagen-like domain, (3) a 30-amino acid α-helical, hydrophobic coiled-coil neck domain, which is crucial for initiating the oligomerization, and (4) a 188-amino acid C-terminal carbohydrate recognition domain [14, 15].
Three common structural polymorphisms caused by single point mutations are found in MBL2 gene and all are present on exon 1: allele “D” at codon 52 which is C to T nucleotide substitution, allele “B” at codon 54, and allele “C” at codon 57, and both are G to A nucleotide substitutions. All three mutations occur within the collagen domain changing the ability of MBL to oligomerize. The wild type is termed allele “A” while the structural variants B, C, and D are often gathered and referred to as zero “0” [16–18]. It has been proposed that polymorphisms in MBL2 gene are involved in determining susceptibility to RVVC [6]. However, the role of MBL genes polymorphism remains controversial and has not been determined by all investigators yet [19]. A similar work was carried out [6, 16–19]. However, none of them discussed Egyptian patients. To fill this gap, this study would give the chance to investigate MBL codon 54 polymorphism among childbearing Egyptian women complaining of RVVC.
The aim of this study was to investigate the potential role of MBL serum level and MBL2 gene exon 1 codon 54 polymorphism in determining susceptibility to RVVC in childbearing Egyptian women. Therefore, it could be possible to explore new potential therapeutic modalities for MBL-deficient women suffering from RVVC.
2. Materials and Methods
This study was conducted at Immunology Research and Molecular Biology Laboratories, Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, which is located 100 kilometers northeast of Cairo, the capital of Egypt. This study was carried out in the period of December 2014 to May 2017.
2.1. Ethical Approval
This study was approved by the institutional review board, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. The study subjects were informed, preliminary, about the nature and the purpose of the study. The written informed consent was taken from all participants. The study subjects were not exposed to any harm or risk. Participants' data were confidential.
2.2. Subjects
The present study enrolled 59 childbearing women (age, 30–40 years). Three replicates of vaginal swabs were taken from women that were suffering from suspected VVC and were exposed to at least three episodes of VVC in the last 12 months. Control subjects were 59 healthy women (age, 30–40 years) without previous history of Candida infection or gynecologic complaints.
All RVVC cases and controls were seen at Zagazig University Hospitals and Qenayat Hospital Gynecology Outpatient Clinics, Qenayat, Egypt (neighbor to Zagazig City). RVVC cases and controls were matched for age, marital status, and socioeconomic status. The sociodemographic variables of the study subjects were collected by a questionnaire. The genital hygiene behavior of the study subjects was assessed by genital hygiene questionnaire. The exclusion criteria for this study were pregnancy, contraception, sexual activity and vaginal douching in the last week, steroid therapy for less than 3 months, diabetes, immunodeficiencies, and immunosuppressive therapy.
2.3. Vaginal Swabs and Identification of Candida Species
Vaginal swabs were obtained using sterile cotton-tipped plastic swabs and cultured onto Sabouraud Dextrose Agar Medium (Sabouraud Dextrose Agar, Oxoid, UK) and then subcultured on chromogenic agar medium (CHROMagar™ Candida, Paris, France) for presumptive identification of species. The vaginal samples were also tested for Trichomonas vaginalis by wet mount and for bacterial vaginosis by Amsel criteria [20]. Cultures were examined under light microscope to show the budding yeast cells with or without pseudohyphae, blastospores, and germ tubes [3, 21]. In addition, biochemical tests were studied using Hi-Candida™ API identification kit (Biomereux, France).
2.4. Blood Sampling
Three mL of peripheral blood was obtained from each study participant by venous puncture, collected and divided into 2 (13 × 75 mm) tubes, EDTA containing tube and Wassermann's tube, and stored at −20°C until used. Blood collected in EDTA tube was subjected to subsequent direct blood PCR. The blood collected in Wassermann's tube was centrifuged at 3000 RPM for 10 min and the supernatant serum was collected for subsequent determination of MBL serum level.
2.5. Quantitation of Serum MBL
MBL serum level was measured by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer's company protocol (Quantikine® ELISA Human MBL; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA).
2.6. Determination of MBL2 Gene Polymorphism
MBL2 gene exon 1 was amplified by direct blood PCR (Phusion™ Blood Direct PCR Master Mix; Thermo Scientific™, USA). PCR reactions were performed in 50 μL final volume using 0.5 μM of each primer (forward: 5′-TAGGAC AGAGGGCATGCTC-3; reverse: 5′-CAGGCAGTT TCCTCTGGAAGG-3′ PCR product size 349 bp), 25 μL of 2X Phusion Blood Direct PCR Master Mix, and 5 μL whole blood. After an initial lysis of cells for 5 min at 98°C, PCR reactions were run for 40 cycles including 5 s at 98°C, 30 s at 58°C, and 30 s at 72°C with a final extension at 72°C for 1 min. PCR products were loaded directly into pits of 1.5% agarose gel and analyzed by electrophoresis. The obtained PCR products were digested with restriction enzyme, Ban I according to the manufacturer's company protocol (BshNI; Thermo Scientific, USA). The wild allele “A” was cut into two fragments, 260 and 89 bp, while the variant allele “B” remained uncut. The digested products were loaded on 2% agarose gel and analyzed by electrophoresis.
2.7. Statistical Analysis
Quantitative data were represented as mean value ± 1 standard deviation (SD), median and range. Genotype and allele frequencies were determined by direct counting. Associations between MBL genotype or alleles and clinical variables were analyzed by Pearson Chi-Square (χ2) and Fisher's exact tests. The strength of association of MBL2 exon 1 codon 54 genotypes and frequency of RVVC was calculated by estimating odds ratios (OR) for matched data at confidence interval (CI) 95%. All tests were 2-tailed. Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for calculation of median difference between independent groups. Results were considered statistically significant when P (probability) values were equal to or less than 0.05. All analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 24 (SPSS version 24, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.).
3. Results
All RVVC cases and controls were negative for Trichomonas vaginalis and bacterial vaginosis; controls were also negative for Candida spp. All the vaginal swabs taken from the 59 RVVC childbearing women showed fungal growth on both Sabouraud Dextrose Agar and chromogenic agar. Further identification of Candida spp. by light microscopic examination and API identification kit revealed that 88.1% of the isolates were identified as C. albicans while 8.5% and 3.4% of the isolated were identified as C. glabrata and C. tropicalis, respectively.
No statistically significant difference in MBL serum level was observed between RVVC cases and controls (P = 0.145) (Figure 1). The median MBL serum level in RVVC cases was 0.90 μg/mL (range, 0.09–3.53 μg/mL) compared with 1.05 μg/mL (range, 0.14−3.70 μg/mL) in controls.
As given in Figure 2, the molecular sizes (349 bp) of PCR products from RVVC cases (lanes 13 to 30) were parallel to those from the controls (lanes 5 to 12). This showed a successful process of PCR technique for amplification and detection of exon 1 of MBL2 gene.
PCR products digested by Ban I restriction enzyme produced two fragments of 260 and 89 bp for wild MBL genotypes (AA), three fragments of 349, 260, and 89 bp for heterozygous MBL genotypes (AB), and one uncut fragment of 349 bp for mutant homozygous MBL genotypes (BB) (Figure 3).
The distribution of MBL genotypes and alleles was significantly different between RVVC cases and controls (P = 0.038 and 0.013, resp.). Allele A (wild allele) was present, respectively, in 83.9% of RVVC cases and in 94.0% of controls, whereas allele B (mutant allele) was present in 16.1% of RVVC cases and in 6% of controls. No homozygous mutant genotype (BB) was found among controls. The risk of RVVC is 3.04 times higher among those who carried variant allele “B” in comparison to those who did not (Table 1).
Table 1.
Variable | RVVC cases n = (59) |
Controls n = (59) |
Test of significance | P value | OR (95% CI) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | ||||
Genotypes | |||||||
AA | 42 | 71.2 | 52 | 88.1 | Fisher's exact | 0.038 ∗ | 2.65 ∗∗ |
AB | 15 | 25.4 | 7 | 11.9 | |||
BB | 2 | 3.4 | 0 | 0.0 | |||
| |||||||
Alleles | |||||||
A | 99 | 83.9 | 111 | 94.0 |
χ
2 3.75 |
0.013 ∗ | 3.04 ∗∗∗ |
B | 19 | 16.1 | 7 | 6.0 |
∗Significant difference; ∗∗OR for genotypes AB/AA. CI = 0.991–7.104; ∗∗∗OR for alleles B/A. CI = 1.228–7.545.
Table 2 shows that, in the presence of wild MBL genotype, the risk of RVVC associated with bad genital hygiene behavior was 3.47 times higher than that associated with good genital hygiene behavior (P = 0.004) while in the presence of mutant MBL genotype the risk was increased to 18.67 times (P = 0.021).
Table 2.
MBL genotype | Case n = (57) |
Control n = (59) |
Test of significance | P value | OR (95% CI) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | ||||
AA | |||||||
Bad | 28 | 66.7 | 19 | 36.5 |
χ
2 8.436 |
0.004 ∗ | 3.47 ∗∗ |
Good | 14 | 33.3 | 33 | 63.5 | |||
| |||||||
AB | |||||||
Bad | 14 | 93.3 | 3 | 42.9 | Fisher's exact | 0.021 ∗ | 18.67 ∗∗∗ |
Good | 1 | 6.7 | 4 | 57.1 |
∗Significant difference; ∗∗OR for genital hygiene behaviors, bad/good. CI = 1.478–8.146; ∗∗∗OR for genital hygiene behaviors, bad/good. CI = 1.500–232.291.
In RVVC group, the mutant types (AB and BB) MBL serum levels were significantly lower than the wild type (AA) MBL serum level (P = 0.019 and 0.033, resp.). However, in control group, no statistically significant difference was found between mutant type and wild type MBL serum levels (P = 0.23) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Study group | MBL serum level (µg/mL) | Test of significance |
P value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AA | AB | BB | ||||
RVVC cases (n = 59) | (n = 42) | (n = 15) | (n = 2) | |||
Mean ± SD | 1.31 ± 0.88 | 0.69 ± 0.33 | 0.29 ± 0.28 | Kruskal-Wallis | 0.011 ∗ |
0.019
∗∗1 0.033∗∗2 0.265∗∗3 |
Median (range) | 1.02 (0.09–3.53) | 0.67 (0.13–1.05) | 0.4 (0.09–0.49) | |||
| ||||||
Controls (n = 59) | (n = 52) | (n = 7) | ||||
Mean ± SD | 1.35 ± 0.86 | 1.08 ± 0.96 | - | Mann–Whitney | 0.23 | |
Median (range) | 1.15 (0.14–3.70) | 0.51 (0.35–2.98) |
∗Significant difference; ∗∗1P value between AA and AB genotypes MBL concentrations; ∗∗2P value between AA and BB genotypes MBL concentrations; ∗∗3P value between AB and BB genotypes MBL concentrations.
4. Discussion
Vulvovaginal candidiasis is one of the most prevalent vaginal infections and represents approximately 40%–50% of all cases of infectious vulvovaginitis [22]. The prevalence of RVVC among childbearing women and its importance as an Egyptian public health problem make an interest to continue research on such cases to add deep knowledge on RVVC and to understand the behavior of its pathogen and its epidemiology within Egyptian patients [23]. RVVC and its control by MBL were studied previously, but unfortunately none of the published papers discussed such cases in Egyptian patients. In an attempt to fill this gap, this study was designed on 118 childbearing Egyptian women to find out new therapeutic strategy for RVVC.
The suspected Candida isolates were identified as described previously [3, 4, 24]. In the present study, C. albicans was the most prevalent (88.1%) Candida spp. isolated from RVVC cases, followed by C. glabrata (8.5%) and C. tropicalis (3.4%), respectively. This study agreed with most studies worldwide which have reported that C. albicans is the main infectious Candida spp. implicated in infections of RVVC (76 to 89%). The overall percentage of non-albicans Candida spp. ranges from 11% to 24% [25–28].
Genetic factors often play an important role in primary or idiopathic RVVC occurring in women without any recognizable risk factors. Moreover, the recurrence of acute attacks of VVC triggered by known risk factor is strongly relevant to genetic predisposition [29]. The understanding of such genetic factors that determine susceptibility to RVVC is crucial for future therapeutic modalities in these patients [30]. Variation of MBL concentration in cervicovaginal fluid depends on individual's MBL genotype [12]. The strong binding of Candida spp. to MBL suggested the importance of this protein in host defense against VVC [13].
The present study found no statistical significant difference in MBL serum level between RVVC cases and controls. This finding is supported by a previous study that found no significant difference when comparing MBL serum levels between RVVC cases and controls [31]. However, some investigators found that MBL serum level was higher in RVVC cases when compared to controls indicating that MBL might be defensive against RVVC [13]. On the contrary, other studies reported that MBL level was lower in RVVC cases compared to controls [12, 32]. Nevertheless, they depended on measurement of MBL in vaginal fluid while, in the present study, MBL was measured in serum. From practical point of view, determination of MBL level in vaginal discharge is technically too difficult to perform and to standardize. Even more, the entity of vaginal fluid is changeable throughout menstrual period [33].
The present study could find an association between MBL2 exon 1 codon 54 polymorphism and susceptibility to RVVC. Carriage of mutant allele “B” was more frequent in women with RVVC (16.1%) than in controls (6%). In previous studies, MBL2 codon 54 polymorphism has been associated with increased frequency of RVVC in Latvian, Brazilian, Chinese, and Belgium [12, 32, 34, 35] but not Italian patients [31].
In the present study, analysis of genital hygiene behaviors among wild MBL genotypes estimated that bad genital hygiene behaviors increased the risk of RVVC by 3.47 times while the risk of RVVC has been elevated to 18.67 times in the presence of mutant MBL genotypes. These results supported the fact that RVVC is monomicrobial; however, it is multifactorial disease in origin [36]. Moreover, good genital hygiene behaviors might be protective against RVVC in genetically predisposed women [37].
Furthermore, this study has reported that MBL2 codon 54 polymorphism was significantly associated with reduction in MBL serum levels among RVVC cases; however, such reduction was statistically nonsignificant among controls. This finding was in agreement with Milanese et al. [31] Consistently, MBL2 codon 54 polymorphism has been associated with reduced vaginal concentrations of MBL [12, 38]. MBL2 codon 54 polymorphism results in either nonfunctional monomers in homozygotes or low functional serum levels of protein with shorter half-lives that are easily degraded to lower oligomeric forms in heterozygotes [39]. It has been estimated that healthy individuals who are homozygous for the wild type alleles (A/A) have MBL serum levels above 1 μg/mL while heterozygous individuals (A/0) have serum levels ranging from 0.5 to 1 μg/mL. However, homozygous individuals for the variant MBL2 alleles (0/0) have MBL serum concentration below 0.05 μg/mL [40]. Furthermore, MBL deficiency was defined before by plasmatic protein levels below 0.5 μg/mL or by an MBL function lower than 0.2 U/μL C4 deposition [41].
In addition, other structural and promoter MBL2 gene polymorphisms have been identified resulting in 7 common secretor haplotypes that eventually determine the serum MBL concentrations. HYPA, LYQA, and LYPA haplotypes are associated with high serum level and LXPA, HYPD, LYPB, and LYQC haplotypes are associated with low serum level. Therefore, it is conceivable that one patient with wild type allele for MBL codon 54 may have a promoter combination, for example, LXP haplotype that downregulates MBL production resulting in low MBL serum level [39]. However, MBL2 gene structural polymorphisms alone could be responsible for the defective binding of MBL to Candida via its lectin domain at early phase of vaginal infection by the fungus [42].
Interestingly, it was previously documented that both wild type and mutant type MBL vaginal levels were significantly higher in acute VVC than in controls but not in RVVC, suggesting that MBL may increase during first episode of VVC, albeit subsequent episodes may make the immune system less sensitive to Candida [32]. Moreover, there is an emerging hypothesis that both acute VVC and RVVC stem from different host reaction modulated by Candida. Acute VVC associated with high numbers of Candida results in immunosuppressive reaction of the host while RVVC being associated with low numbers of Candida generates hypersensitivity reaction in genetically predisposed women. The host reactions were linked to modulators resulting from interaction between mast cells and substances such as MBL involved in mycotic infections. That hypothesis introduced a concept of “vaginal cutoff” which is the minimum quantity level of the Candida above which it would activate an allergic reaction that justifies the recurrence of episodes of VVC, in vulnerable subjects [43].
Data from previous reports of Babula et al. hypothesized that women's genetic capacity to produce MBL and IL-4 influenced their susceptibility to RVVC. They stated strong inverse relationship between vaginal concentrations of IL-4 and anticandidal compounds, MBL and nitric oxide metabolites. Additionally, the homozygous variant allele IL-4∗T was associated with >2-fold increase of IL-4, >3-fold decrease of nitric oxide, and >2-fold decrease of MBL concentrations in vaginal fluid [12, 44].
Since MBL serum levels could be affected by infections, hormone and drug intake, several investigators chose MBL genotyping over MBL serum level. They observed that MBL serum level is strongly associated with MBL2 gene polymorphisms [45, 46]. Nevertheless, MBL serum levels are not affected by age, circadian rhythm, and physical exercise and, during inflammation, do not increase over 3-4-fold compared to baseline level unlike other acute phase reactants like C-reactive protein which increases sharply from 10-fold to 1000-fold [40, 47]. Despite the fact that MBL serum measurement is widely diffused as a diagnostic test, there are not standard guidelines able to determine which patient is needed to be tested [40, 48].
Taken together, these data suggest that other factors such as cytokine levels, other alleles, or additional polymorphisms are in tight linkage disequilibrium that may affect the level of MBL. Consequently, some observations in this study could be explained, such that some low serum MBL levels were associated with wild genotype (AA) as well as the nonsignificant difference in MBL serum level between RVVC cases and controls and between different genotypes among controls.
Collectively, MBL genotype of a person offers only a general idea of the expected plasma concentration and different combinations of haplotypes are associated with a wide range of MBL concentrations. Genotypes are fairly good indicators of the average MBL concentrations at population level albeit less reliable predictors for plasma MBL at individual level [49, 50].
As RVVC may not be substantially treated; therefore, further deciphering of vaginal host defense mechanisms against Candida becomes essential to design novel immunotherapeutic strategies to improve and/or substitute the usual antifungal treatments. Further work in this approach focusing on MBL protein and its direct impact on Candida spp. was conducted in vitro (results have not been published yet). The efficacy of MBL protein as a potential therapeutic agent against RVVC, particularly among MBL-deficient women, should be clearly investigated.
5. Conclusion
Women carrying the variant allele “B” of MBL2 codon 54 polymorphism have more risk of developing RVVC. Therefore, MBL genotypic analysis can be used as surrogates for MBL serum levels in order to identify MBL-deficient women for alternative therapeutic options.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their gratitude to Research Center of Advanced Materials, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia, for support. Also, the authors would like to acknowledge Scientific and Medical Research Center of Zagazig University (ZSMRC), Faculty of Medicine, for support.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
References
- 1.Al-Ahmadey Z. Z., Mohamed S. A. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: agents and its virulence factors. Microbiology Research International. 2014;2(3):28–37. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pereira D. C., Backes L. T., Calil L. N., Fuentefria A. M. A six-year epidemiological survey of vulvovaginal candidiasis in cytopathology reports in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Revista de Patologia Tropical. 2012;41(2):163–168. doi: 10.5216/rpt.v41i2.19324. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.El-Sayed T. I., Atef D., Amer M., Mahdy A., Enan G. Molecular characterization and inhibition by natural agents of multidrug resistant Candida strains causing vaginal candidiasis. Research Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015;9(1):1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Enan G., EL-Sayed T. I., Atef D., Amer M., Mahdy A. Causal organisms, pathogenicity, laboratory diagnosis and treatment of candidiasis. Research Journal of Applied Sciences . 2015;10(4):115–135. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bruno V. M., Shetty A. C., Yano J., Fidel P. L., Noverr M. C., Peters B. M. Transcriptomic Analysis of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis Identifies a Role for the NLRP3 Inflammasome. mBio. 2015;6(2):1–15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00182-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jaeger M., Plantinga T. S., Joosten L. A. B., Kullberg B.-J., Netea M. G. Genetic basis for recurrent vulvo-vaginal candidiasis. Current Infectious Disease Reports. 2013;15(2):136–142. doi: 10.1007/s11908-013-0319-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cassone A. Vulvovaginal Candida albicans infections: Pathogenesis, immunity and vaccine prospects. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2015;122(6):785–794. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Puel A., Cypowyj S., Maródi L., Abel L., Picard C., Casanova J. Inborn errors of human IL-17 immunity underlie chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2012;12(6):616–622. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e328358cc0b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rosentul D. C., Delsing C. E., Jaeger M., et al. Gene polymorphisms in pattern recognition receptors and susceptibility to idiopathic recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2014;5, article 483 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Worthley D. L., Bardy P. G., Gordon D. L., Mullighan C. G. Mannose-binding lectin and maladies of the bowel and liver. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2006;12(40):6420–6428. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i40.6420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Donders G. G. G., Bellen G., Mendling W. Management of recurrent vulvo-vaginal candidosis as a chronic illness. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2010;70(4):306–321. doi: 10.1159/000314022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Babula O., Lazdane G., Kroica J., Ledger W. J., Witkin S. S. Relation between recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis, vaginal concentrations of mannose-binding lectin, and a mannose-binding lectin gene polymorphism in latvian women. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2003;37(5):733–737. doi: 10.1086/377234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Henić E., Thiel S., Mårdh P.-A. Mannan-binding lectin in women with a history of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2010;148(2):163–165. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Garred P., Larsen F., Seyfarth J., Fujita R., Madsen H. O. Mannose-binding lectin and its genetic variants. Genes & Immunity. 2006;7(2):85–94. doi: 10.1038/sj.gene.6364283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Presanis J. S., Kojima M., Sim R. B. Biochemistry and genetics of mannan-binding lectin (MBL) Biochemical Society Transactions. 2003;31(4):748–752. doi: 10.1042/BST0310748. doi: 10.1042/BST0310748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Madsen H. O., Garred P., Kurtzhals J. A. L., et al. A new frequent allele is the missing link in the structural polymorphism of the human mannan-binding protein. Immunogenetics. 1994;40(1):37–44. doi: 10.1007/bf00163962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sumiya M., Super M., Tabona P., et al. Molecular basis of opsonic defect in immunodeficient children. The Lancet. 1991;337(8757):1569–1570. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93263-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lipscombe R. J., Sumiya M., Hill A. V. S., et al. High frequencies in African and non-African populations of independent mutations in the mannose binding protein gene. Human Molecular Genetics. 1992;1(9):709–715. doi: 10.1093/hmg/1.9.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wächtler B., Citiulo F., Jablonowski N., et al. Candida albicans-epithelial interactions: dissecting the roles of active penetration, induced endocytosis and host factors on the infection process. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036952.e36952 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Amsel R., Totten P. A., Spiegel C. A., Chen K. C., Eschenbach D., Holmes K. K. Nonspecific vaginitis. American Journal of Medicine. 1983;74(1):14–22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91112-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Milne L. J. R., Mackie T. Mackie & McCartney Practical medical microbiology. 14th. New York , USA: Charchil Livingstone; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li J., Fan S.-R., Liu X.-P., et al. Biased genotype distributions of Candida albicans strains associated with vulvovaginal candidosis and candidal balanoposthitis in China. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2008;47(9):1119–1125. doi: 10.1086/592249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hayat I. M., Nagat S. S., Nermine N., Zeinab A. B. Prevalence of Vaginal Infection and Associated Risk Health Behaviors Among Married Women in Ismailia City. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2015;4(5):555–567. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kamara P., Hylton-Kong T., Brathwaite A., et al. Vaginal infections in pregnant women in Jamaica: Prevalence and risk factors. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2000;11(8):516–520. doi: 10.1258/0956462001916425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Corsello S. A., Spinillo A., Osnengo G., et al. An epidemiological survey of vulvovaginal candidiasis in Italy. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2003;110(1):66–72. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(03)00096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Holland J., Young M. L., Lee O., Chen S. C. A. Vulvovaginal carriage of yeasts other than Candida albicans. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2003;79(3):249–250. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.3.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Achkar J. M., Fries B. C. Candida infections of the genitourinary tract. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2010;23(2):253–273. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00076-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Isibor J. O., Samuel S. O., Nwaham C. I., Amanre I. N., Igbinovia O., Akhile A. O. Prevalence of bacterial and Candida albicans infection amongst women attending Irrua specialist teaching hospital, Irrua, Nigeria. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2011;5(20):3126–3130. doi: 10.5897/AJMR10.410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sobel J. Infectious diseases. 4th. Vol. 1. Louis, Mosby: St; 2017. Vaginitis, vulvitis, cervicitis, and cutaneous vulval lesions; pp. 483–491. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Smeekens S. P., van de Veerdonk F. L., Kullberg B. J., Netea M. G. Genetic susceptibility to Candida infections. EMBO Molecular Medicine. 2013;5(6):805–813. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201201678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Milanese M., Segat L., De Seta F., et al. MBL2 genetic screening in patients with recurrent vaginal infections. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2008;59(2):146–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2007.00549.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liu F., Liao Q., Liu Z. Mannose-binding lectin and vulvovaginal candidiasis. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2006;92(1):43–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schlosser B. J., Mirowski G. W. Approach to the patient with vulvovaginal complaints. Dermatologic Therapy. 2010;23(5):438–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2010.01348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Giraldo P. C., Babula O., Gonçalves A. K. S., et al. Mannose-binding lectin gene polymorphism, vulvovaginal candidiasis, and bacterial vaginosis. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2007;109(5):1123–1128. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000260386.17555.a5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Donders G. G. G., Babula O., Bellen G., Linhares I. M., Witkin S. S. Mannose-binding lectin gene polymorphism and resistance to therapy in women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2008;115(10):1225–1231. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01830.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Astill S. N., Shankland G., Winter A. Trends in Urology. Vol. 14. Gynaecology Sexual Health; 2009. Practical management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis; pp. 18–22. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ocaktan M. E., Baran E., Akdur R. Evaluation of habitual behavior related to genital hygiene in women living in a health care center area. Saudi Medical Journal. 2010;31(11):1251–1256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wojitani M. D. K. H., De Aguiar L. M., Baracat E. C., Linhares I. M. Association between mannose-binding lectin and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene polymorphisms and recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2012;285(1):149–153. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-1920-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nedovic B., Posteraro B., Leoncini E., et al. Mannose-binding lectin codon 54 gene polymorphism and vulvovaginal candidiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014 doi: 10.1155/2014/738298.738298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.De Pascale G., Cutuli S. L., Pennisi M. A., Antonelli M. The role of mannose-binding lectin in severe sepsis and septic shock. Mediators of Inflammation. 2013;2013:8. doi: 10.1155/2013/625803.625803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dean M. M., Minchinton R. M., Heatley S., Eisen D. P. Mannose binding lectin acute phase activity in patients with severe infection. Journal of Clinical Immunology. 2005;25(4):346–352. doi: 10.1007/s10875-005-4702-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ip W. K., Lau Y. L. Role of mannose-binding lectin in the innate defense against Candida albicans: enhancement of complement activation, but lack of opsonic function, in phagocytosis by human dendritic cells. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2004;190(3):632–640. doi: 10.1086/422397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Murina F., Graziottin A., Felice R., Radici G. L., Di Francesco S. The Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: Proposal of a Personalized Therapeutic Protocol. ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;2011:1–4. doi: 10.5402/2011/806065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Babula O., Lazdane G., Kroiča J., Linhares I. M., Ledger W. J., Witkin S. S. Frequency of interleukin-4 (IL-4) -589 gene polymorphism and vaginal concentrations of IL-4, nitric oxide, and mannose-binding lectin in women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2005;40(9):1258–1262. doi: 10.1086/429246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shawky R. M., Abd El-Fattah S. M., Kamal T. M., Esa M. A., El Nady G. H. Genotyping of mannose-binding lectin (MBL2) codon 54 and promoter alleles in Egyptian infants with acute respiratory tract infections. Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 2014;15(1):31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmhg.2013.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lin C. L., Siu L. K., Lin J. C., et al. Mannose-binding lectin gene polymorphism contributes to recurrence of infective exacerbation in patients with COPD. CHEST. 2011;139(1):43–51. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Eddie Ip W. K., Takahashi K., Alan Ezekowitz R., Stuart L. M. Mannose-binding lectin and innate immunity. Immunological Reviews. 2009;230(1):9–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00789.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Huh J. W., Song K., Yum J.-S., Hong S.-B., Lim C.-M., Koh Y. Association of mannose-binding lectin-2 genotype and serum levels with prognosis of sepsis. Critical Care (London, England) 2009;13(6):p. R176. doi: 10.1186/cc8157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kilpatrick D. C. Mannan-binding lectin: clinical significance and applications. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2002;1572(2-3):401–413. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4165(02)00321-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Esmat S., Omran D., Sleem G. A., Rashed L. Serum Mannan-Binding lectin in Egyptian patients with chronic hepatitis C: Its relation to disease progression and response to treatment. Hepatitis Monthly. 2012;12(4):259–264. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.