Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2018 Apr 13;97(15):e0452. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010452

Clinical feature of infertile men carrying balanced translocations involving chromosome 10

Case series and a review of the literature

Hongguo Zhang a,b, Ruixue Wang a,b, Leilei Li a,b, Yuting Jiang a,b, Han Zhang a,b, Ruizhi Liu a,b,
Editor: NA
PMCID: PMC5908604  PMID: 29642220

Abstract

Rationale:

Infertile male carrying balanced translocations can be broadly divided into two types: pregestational and gestational infertility. Chromosome and breakpoints involved translocation should be considered in genetic counselling for these patients. To date, > 100 cases have been described with carrying balanced translocations involving chromosome 10 in fertile male.

Patient concerns:

We report 11 cases translocation carriers involving chromosome 10, and review 99 carriers of chromosome 10 translocation from reported literature.

Diagnoses:

Eleven cases of chromosomal translocation were diagnosed by cytogenetic analysis. Three of these men had azoospermia or oligozoospermia, while eight had normal semen. Of these latter cases, their partners were able to conceive, but had a tendency to miscarry or have a stillbirth.

Interventions:

Chromosome breakpoints should be considered in genetic counseling. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis should be performed to decrease the high risk of miscarriage and to minimize the genetic risks to offspring for patients with gestational infertility.

Outcomes:

The most common translocations and breakpoints were at t(4;10) and 10q24, observed in 12 and 10 patients respectively. Breakpoints at 10p15.1, 10p12, 10q10, 10q22.1, 10q24.2, and 10q26.3 were linked to pregestational infertility; breakpoints at 10p12.1, 10q11, 10q21.2, and 10q23.3 were associated with gestational infertility; the other breakpoints were connected with both forms of infertility.

Lessons:

Breakpoints at 10p12 and 10q26.3 were associated with pregestational infertility. Other breakpoints at chromosome 10 were correlated with gestational infertility. These breakpoints should be considered when counseling men with chromosome 10 translocations should be informed of their options.

Keywords: balanced translocation, chromosome 10, chromosome breakpoint, genetic counseling, male infertility

1. Introduction

Chromosomal abnormalities are often identified as a cause of male infertility,[1] and balanced chromosomal translocations are the most common structural rearrangement.[2] Individuals affected by such translocations with failure of spermatogenesis because of meiotic impairment can have gamete formation problems, and these can lead to either recurrent pregnancy loss, or a child with intellectual disability, and/or multiple congenital malformations.[3] These effects are associated with specific chromosomes and breakpoints involved in the translocations.[4] Most breakpoints in balanced chromosome translocations are at, or near segmental duplications,[3] some of which can disrupt the structure of important genes, leading to male infertility.[5]

There might be important genes associated with spermatogenesis or sperm function on chromosome 10. For example, meiosis-expressed gene 1 (MEIG1) is located on chromosome 10p13, and is associated with the control of spermiogenesis.[6] Sperm-associated antigen 6 (SPAG6) gene, mapped on chromosome 10 at 10p12.2, is essential for sperm flagellar motility, and is important for the maintenance of the structural integrity of mature spermatozoa.[7] The wings apart-like protein (WAPL) gene is located on chromosome 10q23.2, and is implicated in spermatogenesis.[8] A breakpoint at 10q24 is also linked with impaired spermatogenesis and recurrent spontaneous abortion.[9]

Genetic counseling remains a challenge for male carriers of chromosomal translocations. Research has shown that clinical characteristics do not differ between couple with recurrent miscarriages carrying a structural chromosomal abnormality who accept and those who decline preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) after extensive genetic counseling.[10]Similarly, a systematic review concluded a lack of sufficient evidence that PGD can improve the live birth rate in couples with such carriers.[11] The live birth rates on the first trial for couples who chose PGD, and the first pregnancy rate for couples who desired natural conception after genetic counseling were between 37.8, to 53.8%, respectively. Although, the time required to achieve pregnancy was similar in both groups, the cumulative live birth rates were between 67.6 to 65.4%, respectively.[12]

This study was established to explore the clinical features, and translocation breakpoints in male carriers of reciprocal chromosomal translocations involving chromosome 10. This paper also highlights the importance of genetic counseling, and the option of using assisted reproductive technologies, and PGD for such men who might be infertile.

2. Patients and methods

2.1. Study design

We performed a single-center retrospective study, and searched literature on translocations in chromosome 10 from infertile men was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database.

2.2. Patient selection

Between the years July 2010 to June 2017, we recruited 11 male carriers (25.9 ± 3.6 years) of chromosome 10 translocations experiencing infertility—or receiving associated counseling—from the outpatient department at the Centre for Reproductive Medicine, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, P. R. China. All patients underwent a thorough physical examination, semen analyses, and were required to complete a detailed questionnaire concerning their marital status, and reproductive, and medical history. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Jilin University, and written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

2.3. Semen analysis

Samples were obtained by masturbation from each patient, after 3 to 7 days of abstinence. Semen analysis was performed according to the World Health Organization guidelines. If no spermatozoa were found, the samples were analyzed again after concentrating them by centrifugation. Azoospermia and oligozoospermia were defined as described.[5] All analyses were performed at the same laboratory, and all data were accessed from medical records.

2.4. Cytogenetic analysis

Chromosomes from cultured peripheral blood lymphocytes were analyzed after G (Giemsa)-banding. Peripheral blood samples (0.5 mL) from each patient were collected in sterile tubes containing 30 U/mL heparin. Lymphocytes were cultured for 72 hours at 37°C in appropriate culture medium (Yishengjun; Guangzhou Baidi Biotech, Guangzhou, P. R. China). Colcemid (20 μg/mL) was added to the cultures 1 hour before harvesting. Karyotyping of metaphase chromosomes were performed as described.[5] In all cases, at least 20 metaphase plates were counted, and 6 karyotypes were analyzed for each patient. The resolution level of the chromosome analysis was between 400 to 550 band levels. The karyotype nomenclature was described in accordance with the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature 2009.

2.5. Analysis of identified translocation breakpoints

A search for reports on translocations in chromosome 10 from infertile men was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar and CNKI database. The keywords were “chromosome / translocation / sperm” and “chromosome / translocation / abortion” for these searches. We included cases of balanced chromosomal translocations involving chromosome 10 for adult fertile-age men, and excluded those cases without breakpoints involving chromosome 10, or those with complex chromosomal translocations, chimeras, or live born children. The links of translocation breakpoints with male infertility, and recurrent pregnancy loss were analyzed. A total of 91 carriers of chromosomal 10 translocations were found by these searches.

3. Results

Eleven translocation carriers involving chromosome 10 were detected in this study. Karyotype results from these 11 patients are summarized in Table 1. Three of these men had azoospermia or oligozoospermia (i.e., leading to pregestational infertility), while 8 had normal semen. Of these latter cases, their partners were able to conceive, but had a tendency to miscarry, or have a stillbirth (defined as gestational infertility): thus, 5 couples had experienced recurrent spontaneous abortions, and 3 had experienced 2 stillbirths.

Table 1.

Karyotypes of chromosome 10 translocation carriers and their clinical features.

3.

Karyotyping results, clinical manifestations, and the breakpoints on chromosome 10 from literature analysis were collected, and are shown in Table 2 . The most common translocation was t(4;10), observed in 12 patients, followed by t(7;10) (N = 10), and t(10;11) (N = 8). A total of 101 karyotypes included chromosome 10 translocations. The most common breakpoint, at 10q24, was observed in 10 patients, followed by 10q26 (N = 9) and 10p13 (N = 8). Breakpoints at 10p15.1, 10p12, 10q10, 10q22.1, 10q24.2, and 10q26.3 were linked to pregestational infertility, and breakpoints at 10p12.1, 10q11, 10q21.2 and 10q23.3 were associated with gestational infertility. The other breakpoints were linked to both pregestational and gestational infertility (Table 3).

Table 2.

Breakpoints in chromosome 10 translocation carriers and clinical features reported in the literature.

3.

Table 2 (Continued).

Breakpoints in chromosome 10 translocation carriers and clinical features reported in the literature.

3.

Table 3.

Incidence of breakpoints on chromosome 10.

3.

4. Discussion

Many factors are known to cause male infertility. Chromosomal abnormalities are perhaps best known to interfere with spermatogenesis. Reciprocal translocations are the most common among such aberrations.[13] In general, the carriers of balanced chromosomal translocations have a normal phenotype but often have fertility problems, such as infertility, repeated miscarriages, or birth of a child affected with congenital abnormalities.[14] Balanced translocations have a variable influence on the carrier's sperm counts, which can range from normal to low, or even to total aspermia.[5] Hence, genetic counseling for male carriers of translocations remains challenging. Kim et al[9] reported the distributions of chromosomal breakpoints in men with chromosome rearrangements and fertility problems. Manvelyan et al[15] reported that translocations were observed in both partners among these couples, and chromosome 10 was involved as the fourth most frequent to be involved with different chromosomal breakpoints. We have also reported the incidence of breakpoints on chromosome between 2 to 4 in infertile men and have reviewed their impact on genetic counseling.[2,16] In fact, chromosome 10 translocations have often been associated with reproductive failure.[14,17,18] In the present study, 11 of the men in our cases were identified as carriers of chromosome 10 translocations, and 91 cases of chromosome, 10 translocation were also reviewed from the literature.

Reproductive failure is defined as the inability to conceive, or to carry a pregnancy to term, and the 2 most common clinical problems are infertility, and recurrent spontaneous miscarriage.[14] Similarly, male infertility can be broadly, divided into 2 types: pregestational and gestational infertility.[19] Here, the breakpoints that we identified on chromosome 10 were found to be associated with pregestational or gestational infertility. Three cases were associated with pregestational infertility and 8 cases with gestational infertility. Kim et al[9] reported that the breakpoint at 10q24 could interfere with spermatogenesis, and be linked to recurrent abortion. To explore the relationship between these breakpoints on chromosome 10, and male infertility, we analyzed the recent literature, and reviewed the clinical features in carriers of chromosome 10 translocations. The karyotype results, and clinical findings for chromosome 10 are summarized in Table 2 . Recurrent miscarriage was the most common clinical finding in these cases. Translocations involving chromosome between 4 to 10 were the most common, observed in 12 infertile men.

Table 3 shows that breakpoints at 10p15.1, 10p12, 10q10, 10q22.1, 10q24.2, and 10q26.3 were linked to pregestational infertility. The SPAG6 gene mapped on chromosome 10 at 10p12.2 has been reported to be essential for sperm flagellar motility, and important for maintenance of the structural integrity of mature spermatozoa.[7] Synaptonemal complex central element protein 1 (SYCE1) is located on chromosome 10q26.3, and defects in this are associated with spermatogenic failure.[20] For the 10q10 situation involving whole-arm translocation, some have reported that the translocation makes pairing between homologous chromosomes difficult during meiosis, and can lead to segregation defects during spermatogenesis or to oligozoospermia. In addition, epigenetic effects might contribute to the phenotypic defects associated with breakpoints caused by translocations.[21] Other breakpoints were associated with gestational infertility, and some of these were also linked to pregestational infertility. For the latter cases, the breakpoints were not responsible for pregestational infertility, so another breakpoint or translocation might have been involved in these individuals. For example, the breakpoint at 10q24 was the most common finding in our series, and was associated with both pregestational and gestational infertility (Table 3). The clinical features associated with this were consistent with the literature.[9] Additionally, excluding the cases of gestational infertility, pregestational infertility might be linked to another breakpoint at 10q26. The man in case 32 with t(6;10)(6p21;10q26) had asthenospermia, and the man in case 75 with t(10;15)(q26; q15) was infertile. Solute carrier family 26, member 8 (SLC26A8) mapped on chromosome 6 at 6p21 has been reported to be associated with nonobstructive asthenozoospermia.[22] Cation channel, sperm-associated, 2 (CATSPER2) is located on chromosome 15q15.3, and is associated with nonsyndromic male infertility.[23] Further research will be necessary to explore the molecular mechanisms, and genetic basis for these carriers, and their phenotypes. Chromosomal breakpoints and translocations should be considered in genetic counseling. Additionally, some of these reported cases required PGD (Table 3). PGD, and prenatal diagnosis can be performed to decrease the high risk of miscarriage, and to minimize the genetic risks to offspring.[13] However, PGD is expensive, and a lower success rate for PGD is seen for male carriers of chromosomal anomalies, and might be associated with the age of the man, and of his spouse.[24,25] Although the infertility of male carriers of a balanced chromosomal translocation can be explained by the meiotic segregation of the rearrangement, and/or by poor quality semen, further attempts at natural conception remain a viable option for some carriers because of the encouraging reported cumulative live birth rate of 64.3%.[26] For these carriers, informed choice should be offered as discussed below.

In conclusion, a total of 102 carriers of chromosome 10 translocations were reviewed. The most common translocation, and breakpoint was t(4;10), and 10q24, respectively. Breakpoints at 10p12, and 10q26.3 were associated with pregestational infertility. Other breakpoints in chromosome 10 were associated with gestational infertility. These breakpoints should be considered in genetic counseling.

Author contributions

Writing – original draft: Hongguo Zhang.

Investigation: Ruixue Wang.

Methodology: Leilei Li, Yuting Jiang.

Writing – review & editing: Han Zhang, Ruizhi Liu.

Funding acquisition: Ruizhi Liu.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: CATSPER2 = Cation channel, sperm-associated, 2, CNKI = the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, MEIG1 = Meiosis-expressed gene 1, PGD = Preimplantation genetic diagnosis, SLC26A8 = Solute carrier family 26, member 8, SPAG6 = Sperm-associated antigen 6, SYCE1 = Synaptonemal complex central element protein 1, WAPL = Wings apart-like protein.

Funding/support: This work was supported by the Special Funds of Jilin Province Development and Reform Commission,China (2017C025).

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

  • [1].Mafra FA, Christofolini DM, Bianco B, et al. Chromosomal and molecular abnormalities in a group of Brazilian infertile men with severe oligozoospermia or non-obstructive azoospermia attending na infertility service. Int Braz J Urol 2011;37:244–50. discussion 250-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Kara M, Sen A, Cetin ES, et al. Chromosomal translocation t (10;19) (q11.2;q13.4) in an infertile male. Eurasian J Med 2014;46:220–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Liu HY, Huang J, Li T, et al. Clinical and molecular cytogenetic analyses of four patients with imbalanced translocations. Mol Cytogenet 2016;9:31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Godo A, Blanco J, Vidal F, et al. Accumulation of numerical and structural chromosome imbalances in spermatozoa from reciprocal translocation carriers. Hum Reprod 2013;28:840–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Zhang HG, Wang RX, Li LL, et al. Male carriers of balanced reciprocal translocations in Northeast China: sperm count, reproductive performance, and genetic counseling. Genet Mol Res 2015;14:18792–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Zhang Z, Shen X, Gude DR, et al. MEIG1 is essential for spermiogenesis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:17055–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Sapiro R, Kostetskii I, Olds-Clarke P, et al. Male infertility, impaired sperm motility, and hydrocephalus in mice deficient in sperm-associated antigen 6. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:6298–305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Kuroda M, Oikawa K, Ohbayashi T, et al. A dioxin sensitive gene, mammalian WAPL, is implicated in spermatogenesis. FEBS Lett 2005;579:167–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Kim JW, Chang EM, Song SH, et al. Complex chromosomal rearrangements in infertile males: complexity of rearrangement affects spermatogenesis. Fertil Steril 2011;95:349–52. 352.e1-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].De Krom G, Arens YH, Coonen E, et al. Recurrent miscarriage in translocation carriers: no differences in clinical characteristics between couples who accept and couples who decline PGD. Hum Reprod 2015;30:484–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Franssen MT, Musters AM, van der Veen F, et al. Reproductive outcome after PGD in couples with recurrent miscarriage carrying a structural chromosome abnormality: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:467–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Ikuma S, Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and natural conception: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss associated with translocation. PLoS One 2015;10:e0129958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Haapaniemi Kouru K, Malmgren H, White I, et al. Meiotic segregation analyses of reciprocal translocations in spermatozoa and embryos: no support for predictive value regarding PGD outcome. Reprod Biomed Online 2017;34:645–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Gada Saxena S, Desai K, Shewale L, et al. Chromosomal aberrations in 2000 couples of Indian ethnicity with reproductive failure. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;25:209–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Manvelyan M, Schreyer I, Höls-Herpertz I, et al. Forty-eight new cases with infertility due to balanced chromosomal rearrangements: detailed molecular cytogenetic analysis of the 90 involved breakpoints. Int J Mol Med 2007;19:855–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Zhang HG, Wang RX, Pan Y, et al. Translocation breakpoints of chromosome 4 in male carriers: clinical features and implications for genetic counseling. Genet Mol Res 2016;15. doi: 10.4238/gmr15049088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Rouen A, Carlier L, Heide S, et al. Potential selection of genetically balanced spermatozoa based on the hypo-osmotic swelling test in chromosomal rearrangement carriers. Reprod Biomed Online 2017;35:372–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Vozdova M, Oracova E, Kasikova K, et al. Balanced chromosomal translocations in men: relationships among semen parameters, chromatin integrity, sperm meiotic segregation and aneuploidy. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013;30:391–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Li D, Zhang H, Wang R, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in men with pregestational and gestational infertility in northeast China. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012;29:829–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Maor-Sagie E, Cinnamon Y, Yaacov B, et al. Deleterious mutation in SYCE1 is associated with non-obstructive azoospermia. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015;32:887–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Aydos SE, Tükün A. Infertility in a man with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia associated with nonrobertsonian translocation t(9;15)(p10;q10). Fertil Steril 2006;86:1001.e7-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Dirami T, Rode B, Jollivet M, et al. Missense mutations in SLC26A8, encoding a sperm-specific activator of CFTR, are associated with human asthenozoospermia. Am J Hum Genet 2013;92:760–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Avidan N, Tamary H, Dgany O, et al. CATSPER2, a human autosomal nonsyndromic male infertility gene. Eur J Hum Genet 2003;11:497–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Keymolen K, Staessen C, Verpoest W, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in female and male carriers of reciprocal translocations: clinical outcome until delivery of 312 cycles. Eur J Hum Genet 2012;20:376–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Kato K, Aoyama N, Kawasaki N, et al. Reproductive outcomes following preimplantation genetic diagnosis using fluorescence in situ hybridization for 52 translocation carrier couples with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss. J Hum Genet 2016;61:687–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Flynn H, Yan J, Saravelos SH, et al. Comparison of reproductive outcome, including the pattern of loss, between couples with chromosomal abnormalities and those with unexplained repeated miscarriages. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;40:109–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Ko DS, Cho JW, Park SY, et al. Clinical outcomes of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and analysis of meiotic segregation modes in reciprocal translocation carriers. Am J Med Genet A 2010;152A:1428–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Aoki K, Fujii T, et al. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes in recurrent miscarriage patients with a paternal or maternal carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement. J Hum Genet 2008;53:622–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Bourrouillou G, Colombies P, Dastugue N. Chromosome studies in 2136 couples with spontaneous abortions. Hum Genet 1986;74:399–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Goud TM, Mohammed Al Harassi S, Khalfan Al Salmani K, et al. Cytogenetic studies in couples with recurrent miscarriage in the Sultanate of Oman. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;18:424–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Perrin A, Caer E, Oliver-Bonet M, et al. DNA fragmentation and meiotic segregation in sperm of carriers of a chromosomal structural abnormality. Fertil Steril 2009;92:583–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Oliver-Bonet M, Navarro J, Codina-Pascual M, et al. From spermatocytes to sperm: meiotic behaviour of human male reciprocal translocations. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2515–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Fryns JP, Van Buggenhout G. Structural chromosome rearrangements in couples with recurrent fetal wastage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998;81:171–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Zhang Y, Zhu S, Wu J, et al. Quadrivalent asymmetry in reciprocal translocation carriers predicts meiotic segregation patterns in cleavage stage embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 2014;29:490–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Tunç E, Tanrıverdi N, Demirhan O, et al. Chromosomal analyses of 1510 couples who have experienced recurrent spontaneous abortions. Reprod Biomed Online 2016;32:414–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Zhang YP, Xu JZ, Yin M, et al. Pregnancy outcomes of 194 couples with balanced translocations. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2006;41:592–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Poli MN, Miranda LA, Gil ED, et al. Male cytogenetic evaluation prior to assisted reproduction procedures performed in Mar del Plata, Argentina. JBRA Assist Reprod 2016;20:62–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Rouen A, Pyram K, Pollet-Villard X, et al. Simultaneous cell by cell study of both DNA fragmentation and chromosomal segregation in spermatozoa from chromosomal rearrangement carriers. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013;30:383–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Yakut T, Ercelen N, Acar H, et al. Meiotic segregation analysis of reciprocal translocations both in sperms and blastomeres. Am J Med Genet A 2006;140:1074–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Castle D, Bernstein R. Cytogenetic analysis of 688 couples experiencing multiple spontaneous abortions. Am J Med Genet 1988;29:549–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Adamoli A, Bernardi F, Chiaffoni G, et al. Reproductive failure and parental chromosome abnormalities. Hum Reprod 1986;1:99–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Olszewska M, Fraczek M, Huleyuk N, et al. Chromatin structure analysis of spermatozoa from reciprocal chromosome translocation (RCT) carriers with known meiotic segregation patterns. Reprod Biol 2013;13:209–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Goddijn M, Joosten JH, Knegt AC, et al. Clinical relevance of diagnosing structural chromosome abnormalities in couples with repeated miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2004;19:1013–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Stephenson MD, Sierra S. Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a parental carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement. Hum Reprod 2006;21:1076–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Diedrich U, Hansmann I, Janke D, et al. Chromosome anomalies in 136 couples with a history of recurrent abortions. Hum Genet 1983;65:48–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Vozdova M, Kasikova K, Oracova E, et al. The effect of the swim-up and hyaluronan-binding methods on the frequency of abnormal spermatozoa detected by FISH and SCSA in carriers of balanced chromosomal translocations. Hum Reprod 2012;27:930–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Brugnon F, Van Assche E, Verheyen G, et al. Study of two markers of apoptosis and meiotic segregation in ejaculated sperm of chromosomal translocation carrier patients. Hum Reprod 2006;21:685–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Estop AM, Van Kirk V, Cieply K. Segregation analysis of four translocations, t(2;18), t(3;15), t(5;7), and t(10;12), by sperm chromosome studies and a review of the literature. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1995;70:80–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Gadow EC, Lippold S, Otano L, et al. Chromosome rearrangements among couples with pregnancy losses and other adverse reproductive outcomes. Am J Med Genet 1991;41:279–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Anton E, Vidal F, Blanco J. Reciprocal translocations: tracing their meiotic behavior. Genet Med 2008;10:730–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Mierla D, Jardan D, Stoian V. Chromosomal abnormality in men with impaired spermatogenesis. Int J Fertil Steril 2014;8:35–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Ghazaey S, Keify F, Mirzaei F, et al. Chromosomal analysis of couples with repeated spontaneous abortions in northeastern iran. Int J Fertil Steril 2015;9:47–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Nishikawa N, Sato T, Suzumori N, et al. Meiotic segregation analysis in male translocation carriers by using fluorescent in situ hybridization. Int J Androl 2008;31:60–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Perrin A, Morel F, Douet-Guilbert N, et al. A study of meiotic segregation of chromosomes in spermatozoa of translocation carriers using fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Andrologia 2010;42:27–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Faed MJ, Lamont MA, Baxby K. Cytogenetic and histological studies of testicular biopsies from subfertile men with chromosome anomaly. J Med Genet 1982;19:49–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Mau UA, Bäckert IT, Kaiser P, et al. Chromosomal findings in 150 couples referred for genetic counselling prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1997;12:930–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Meza-Espinoza JP, Anguiano LO, Rivera H. Chromosomal abnormalities in couples with reproductive disorders. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2008;66:237–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Pundir J, Magdalani L, El-Toukhy T. Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis using FISH analysis for recurrent miscarriage in low-risk reciprocal translocation carriers. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;203:214–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Schwartz S, Palmer CG. Chromosomal findings in 164 couples with repeated spontaneous abortions: with special consideration to prior reproductive history. Hum Genet 1983;63:28–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Vegetti W, Van Assche E, Frias A, et al. Correlation between semen parameters and sperm aneuploidy rates investigated by fluorescence in-situ hybridization in infertile men. Hum Reprod 2000;15:351–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Van Hummelen P, Manchester D, Lowe X, et al. Meiotic segregation, recombination, and gamete aneuploidy assessed in a t(1;10)(p22.1;q22.3) reciprocal translocation carrier by three- and four-probe multicolor FISH in sperm. Am J Hum Genet 1997;61:651–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Estop AM, Cieply K, Munne S, et al. Is there an interchromosomal effect in reciprocal translocation carriers? Sperm FISH studies. Hum Genet 2000;106:517–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Rives N, Jarnot M, Mousset-Siméon N, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis of chromosome segregation and interchromosomal effect in spermatozoa of a reciprocal translocation t(9,10)(q11;p11.1) carrier. J Hum Genet 2003;48:535–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Baccetti B, Bruni E, Collodel G, et al. 10, 15 reciprocal translocation in an infertile man: ultrastructural and fluorescence in-situ hybridization sperm study: case report. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2302–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Martin RH. Meiotic segregation of human sperm chromosomes in translocation heterozygotes: report of a t(9;10)(q34;q11) and a review of the literature. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1988;47:48–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Estop AM, Cieply KM, Aston CE. The meiotic segregation pattern of a reciprocal translocation t(10;12)(q26.1;p13.3) by fluorescence in situ hybridization sperm analysis. Eur J Hum Genet 1997;5:78–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Motoyama M, Takahashi K, Ogawa S, et al. Chromosome analysis by spectral karyotyping of spermatozoa from an oligoasthenozoospermic carrier of a 10; 21 reciprocal translocation. Hum Cell 2011;24:146–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES