Abstract
Submarine mud volcanoes release sediments and gas-rich fluids at the seafloor via deeply-rooted plumbing systems that remain poorly understood. Here the functioning of Venere mud volcano, on the Calabrian accretionary prism in ~1,600 m water depth is investigated, based on multi-parameter hydroacoustic and visual seafloor data obtained using ship-borne methods, ROVs, and AUVs. Two seepage domains are recognized: mud breccia extrusion from a summit, and hydrocarbon venting from peripheral sites, hosting chemosynthetic ecosystems and authigenic carbonates indicative of long-term seepage. Pore fluids in freshly extruded mud breccia (up to 13 °C warmer than background sediments) contained methane concentrations exceeding saturation by 2.7 times and chloride concentrations up to five times lower than ambient seawater. Gas analyses indicate an underlying thermogenic hydrocarbon source with potential admixture of microbial methane during migration along ring faults to the peripheral sites. The gas and pore water analyses point to fluids sourced deep (>3 km) below Venere mud volcano. An upward-branching plumbing system is proposed to account for co-existing mud breccia extrusion and gas seepage via multiple surface vents that influence the distribution of seafloor ecosystems. This model of mud volcanism implies that methane-rich fluids may be released during prolonged phases of moderate activity.
Introduction
Mud volcanoes (MVs) are geological structures created by the extrusion of sediments, water, and volatiles (predominantly methane) from subsurface plumbing systems that may extend to depths of kilometres1–4. Therefore, terrestrial MVs represent a significant natural source of atmospheric methane with emissions estimated to range from 6 to 12.6 Tg/year5,6. The jointly expelled solids and fluids are referred to as mud breccia and over time the extrusion of mud breccia can build morphological edifices up to hundreds of meters in height that cover areas of up to several square kilometres7. Observations of terrestrial MVs suggest that mud volcanism is episodic, with periods of quiescence that may represent up to 95% of the lifetime of a MV, interrupted by brief eruptions (hours to days)3,7,8. Quiescent MV activity is typically characterized by the expulsion of mud and fluids from small cones (<10 m high) or fluid-mud pools and gas seeps8. These features may be linked to extensional faults within the extrusive edifice, in some cases defining sub-circular calderas thought to result from post-eruptive subsidence9.
Less is known about the expressions of activity (quiescent or eruptive) of submarine MVs although estimates of their number (up to 105) exceed that of onshore MVs by up to two orders of magnitude5,10. In the Black Sea, seepage from active MVs is associated with warm sediments ascending from depth and upward flow of aqueous fluids and free gas11,12. At the Håkon Mosby MV (Norway), variations in fluid flow have been found to trigger mud movements and outflows that changed the seafloor morphology and released up to 43000 m3 of methane13,14. Deep-sea MVs are often associated with the presence of shallow gas hydrates12,15 and are known to sustain chemosynthesis-based seafloor ecosystems referred to as cold seeps16. However, the current understanding of the mechanisms driving fluid flow, the fluid sources (i.e. deep vs. shallow), the discharge volumes of volatiles and the impact of mud volcanism on seafloor ecosystems is poorly constrained (e.g. Bohrmann et al.12). To move forward in the understanding of these interrelated issues requires systematic investigations of submarine MV systems to detect the sites of seepage relative to MV morphologies, quantify the fluid discharge, and characterize the composition of fluids emitted at and in the vicinity of the locations of active mud extrusion.
MVs occur globally in a variety of plate tectonic settings, but are most common along convergent margins within accretionary prisms3,4,17. The eastern and central Mediterranean regions host an exceptionally high density of MVs18 the majority of which are located within the accretionary settings of the Africa-Eurasia subduction zone. Major MV provinces have been identified on the Calabrian accretionary prism (CAP), the Mediterranean Ridge, the Anaximander Mountains, and the Nile deep sea fan (Fig. 1a18). On the Mediterranean Ridge, scientific drilling of two MVs19 revealed mud breccia discharge processes20 and a fluid source depth of ~3.5–7 km21. In the Anaximander Mountains region, gas release at MVs supports the formation of shallow gas hydrates22, which have been found to be prone to decomposition during eruptive phases of mud volcanism15. Investigations of MVs on the Nile deep sea fan documented mud outflows and fluid seepage at submarine brine pools23,24. The presence of brine indicated migration from below and through fault-ruptured Messinian evaporite layers24. In the main sediment basins of the eastern Mediterranean, however, Messinian salt deposits are thought to act as seals to fluids ascending from depth. The MV provinces have in turn been found to predominantly occur where salt deposits are absent, thin, or undetected in seismic data18.
Figure 1.
Maps and geological cross section of the study area. (a) Location of Venere mud volcano (MV; star) in the Calabrian accretionary prism (CAP) relative to plate boundaries (red lines) and main MV provinces (light grey shading, after Mascle et al.18) in the E Mediterranean Sea (MR = Mediterranean Ridge, A = Anaximander Mountains, NDSF = Nile Deep Sea Fan); (b) Main morpho-structural zones of the CAP and boundaries after Ceramicola et al.25 (see a) for extent; CE = Calabrian Escarpment); (c) Distribution of MVs (after Ceramicola et al.25 on the internal wedge and forearc basins (see b) for extent) including Venere MV; (d) NE to SW profile across the Crotone basin showing the geological context of the study area. Note that Venere MV is located 7 km from the profile; the profile was drawn according to the interpretation by Panieri et al.38 (see their Fig. 2b showing sparker seismic line J-08); depth scale on left is approximated by assuming a P-wave velocity of 1,500 m/s. Maps a) to (e) were generated in ESRI ArcMap 10.3.1 (www.esri.com).
At least 54 extrusive features have been documented across the inner regions of the Calabrian accretionary prism25 (CAP; Fig. 1a). This includes Venere MV located in the Crotone basin (Fig. 1b) at ~1,600 m of water depth along the axis of the Squillace canyon (Fig. 1c). Systematic hydroacoustic surveys across at least 50 extrusive features previously recognized by Ceramicola et al.25 were performed in November and December 2014 (R/V METEOR cruise M11226). Evidence of active gas emissions into the water column (gas flares) and mud breccia outflows were found only at Venere MV27. A recent study on the extrusive history of Venere MV presented evidence of mud breccia discharge for at least the last 800 years at rates as high as 47000 m3/year, suggesting a long-term pressurized state of the MV system27. These findings contrast with the typical view of short-lived massive mud breccia extrusions interrupting long-term quiescent-type seepage. They require a more detailed study of the present-day activity of Venere MV, including potential fluid sources.
In this study the nature of activity at a submarine MV is investigated, based on a multi-method approach involving hydroacoustic and visual seafloor datasets acquired by AUV (autonomous underwater vehicle) and ROV (remotely operated vehicle) surveys, seafloor sediment samples, gas samples collected under in-situ pressure, and fluid analyses. The multi-parameter datasets are used to study processes involved in active mud volcanism. The processes that drive mud volcanism typically occur at depths not readily accessible for direct sampling, thus the results allow for inferences on crustal dewatering and hydrocarbon generation at depth within the CAP. Element and fluid cycling and contribution of elements to the hydrosphere, which may be applicable to other convergent margins are discussed. Finally, the findings of this study support a new conceptual model involving coeval mud breccia extrusion, faulting and gas seepage, in which subsurface fluid migration pathways are linked to different expressions of seafloor fluid discharge and ecosystem distribution.
The Calabrian accretionary prism and mud volcanoes
The present-day CAP in the central Mediterranean Sea (Fig. 1a) developed from the NW subduction of the African plate (an Ionian lithospheric slab) below the Eurasian plate during the Neogene28,29. The incorporation of evaporites resulting from the Messinian salinity crisis (late Miocene) into the accretionary prism strongly influenced the structure of the CAP. The CAP can be divided into an external (post-Messinian) wedge that hosts evaporites and an internal (pre-Messinian) wedge hosting mainly clastic sediments affected by out-of-sequence thrusts, the most prominent of which is referred to as the Calabrian Escarpment (CE; Fig. 1b30–32). The internal wedge is composed of accreted Mesozoic-Cenozoic units overlain by forearc basins (Spartivento-Crotone basins25,30–33). Late Pleistocene uplift has resulted in exposure of the inner parts of the forearc basins in southern Calabria, where sediments date back to the middle Miocene (late Serravallian) and contain Messinian deposits including <200 m-thick evaporites within the onshore Crotone forearc basin34,35 and in nearshore wells36. Seismic reflection profiles of the offshore forearc basins indicate up to 2 km of sediment, overlying thrust structures (Fig. 1d31,32,37,38). These sequences are inferred to also date back to the Tortonian and to contain Messinian deposits30–32,36. However, the sedimentological composition of these deposits – i.e. whether they contain evaporites – remains unknown.
The majority of the 54 MVs so far identified in the CAP are located across the internal (pre-Messinian) accretionary prism, within the forearc basins and among the thrust-fold belt to seaward25. MVs in both tectonic settings are argued to have been erupting since ca. 3.5 Ma (early Pliocene), based on seismic profiles across two structures. These two MVs are associated with buried extrusive edifices over 1 km thick that interfinger with the upper part of the Plio-Quaternary succession2. The geometries of these and other MVs have been argued to reflect the interaction of fluids rising from within the prism with near-surface structures, including thrusts beneath the forearc basins2,25. Mud breccia from several MVs contained sediment derived from strata ranging in age from Recent to as old as Late Cretaceous, consistent with sources at depth within the accretionary prism2,38,39. Most MVs are associated with seafloor backscatter signatures interpreted to indicate mud breccia outflows over the last glacial to interglacial cycle25. Evidence of presently ongoing fluid release on the CAP is limited, however, to reports of sediment cores releasing gas and findings of small tubeworms in a single core40. Previous studies of MVs on the CAP lack a quantification of the gas or characterization of the involved fluids. Cold seep ecosystems represent important ecological hotspots in the Mediterranean Sea but they are still poorly known on the CAP.
Extrusive morphology of Venere MV – ring-faults and mud outflows
The seafloor morphology of Venere MV is imaged in detail by AUV-borne swath bathymetric data with a horizontal resolution of up to 1.6 m (Fig. 2). Bathymetric observations reveal that Venere MV consists of an eastern and a western summit ~1,200 m apart (Fig. 2a,b), rising up to 100 m above the surrounding seafloor. The twin cones are cut by concentric sets of inward-dipping scarps with surface slopes of 18–45°, which define a circular feature centered ~700 m SE of the western summit (Fig. 2). The scarps are visible as discontinuous morphological steps that offset seafloor features, with relief of up to 40 m in the east and as low as 1 m in the south and west. No scarps are visible in the northwest. The scarps are interpreted as extensional ring faults, defining a caldera up to 3 km in diameter. Seafloor dips suggest the ring faults may extend to subsurface depths of 1–3 km beneath the mud volcano.
Figure 2.
AUV-derived bathymetry (1.6 m grid) of Venere mud volcano (MV) and sampling locations. A fresh mudflow (outlined in white) originating from the W summit extends down to the caldera floor. (a) Perspective view of Venere MV (generated in QPS Fledermaus 7.3.2b; www.qps.nl). Note twin cones labelled as E + W summit, each up to 100 m high and ring faults defining a caldera up to 3 km across. Water column gas flares (red to yellow colours; extracted from hydroacoustic data) up to 260 m in height were observed at five sites, along the peripheral ring faults (Sites 1, 2, 4, 5) and near the W summit (Site 3); (b) Map-view of Venere MV (see Fig. 1 for extent) with inset of the extrusion site of the fresh mudflow at the W summit (generated in ESRI ArcMap 10.3.1; www.esri.com). Red stars mark the flare origins and white circles indicate sampling locations with white numbers referring to the last two GeoB-identifiers (see Table 1 and supplementary Tables S1 and S2 for full details of all stations). See supplementary Figs S2 and S3 for bathymetry without annotations and an alternative perspective view of a) showing the heights of ring faults.
At the western cone (~1,500 m water depth), elongate mudflow deposits are observed extending for horizontal distances of up to ~1,600 m down the southern flank to the foot of the cone (~1620 m water depth; Fig. 2). This most recent mud breccia outflow deposit was investigated via ROV observations (Fig. 3a,b) and sampling at the western cone (Fig. 2). A fresh mudflow originates from the top of the summit (inset Fig. 2), observed as a slightly elevated horseshoe-shaped feature about 3 m across with a central depression (Fig. 3b). Exposed mud breccia deposits showed a blocky structure that lacked the hemipelagic sedimentary cover visible on adjacent flows (Fig. 3a).
Figure 3.
Seafloor photographs. (a) ~10 m long transect across fresh (right) vs. older (left) mud breccia flows draped by hemipelagic sediments near the western summit (see inset of Fig. 2b for location); (b) western summit of Venere MV showing elevated extrusive centre at the origin of the most recent mudflow (see inset of Fig. 2b for location); (c) authigenic carbonate crusts, cold-seep communities and sampling of gas bubbles at a peripheral seep (Site 5); (d) tubeworm colony rooting in a fracture of authigenic carbonate crust at a peripheral seep (Site 1); (e) cold-seep community and thick authigenic carbonate pavement at a peripheral seep (Site 1).
At the eastern cone, bathymetric observations reveal elongate but smooth lobes (Fig. 2), consistent with less recent extrusive activity. This is supported by a sediment core from the eastern summit (GeoB19234-1; Fig. 2), which contained mud breccia draped by several decimetres of hemipelagic sediment (see also Loher et al.27).
Water column gas flares linked to ROV seafloor observations
Hydroacoustic surveys conducted 28 times across Venere MV over a 31 day period during M112 revealed temporally variable but generally persistent gas discharge (flares) from five sites: one slightly below the western summit (Site 3) and four peripheral to the MV cones (Sites 1, 2, 4, and 5; Fig. 2). The flares were up to ~260 m high along the peripheral sites but only up to ~50 m high at the summit. The seafloor origins of the four peripheral gas flares (Sites 1, 2, 4, 5) coincide with surface traces of the ring-fault system (Fig. 2).
ROV explorations confirmed gas bubble emissions (Fig. 3c) at each of the sites. They were settled by chemosynthetic organisms and surrounded by mounds and pavements of authigenic carbonate several decimetres thick (Fig. 3c–e). In contrast at Site 3, below the western summit, gas bubble emissions were not encountered during two ROV surveys. On the fresh mudflows and in surrounding areas draped by hemipelagic sediment no macroscopic indications of seepage (carbonates, chemosynthetic communities) were observed (Fig. 3a,b). Thus no seep-related sediment samples could be collected from Site 3.
Gas and pore water compositions in mud breccia from the western summit
Cores of mud breccia flowing down the flank of the western cone (Table 1, supplementary Table S2) contained rocks clasts to decimetre size in a mud matrix, typically characterized by sediment textures resulting from gas bubbles and pockets giving it a mousse-like appearance. Quantitative degassing of one of the pressure cores (DAPC, GeoB19251-1) yielded 41.3 L of gas from the 11220 cm3 of sediment retrieved, which translated to a volumetric gas-sediment ratio of 3.68. In addition to methane (C1), heavier hydrocarbons such as ethane (C2) and propane (C3) were detected in gas samples from the mud breccia, with traces of butane (C4) and pentane (C5; Table 1). The ratio of methane to higher hydrocarbons (C1/C2+) in gas samples from the mud breccia ranged between 79 and 107. Methane (CH4) constituted 98.5 vol-% of the total gas released from the pressure core and using an average sediment porosity of 0.5 (determined in samples from gravity core GeoB19245-1), the calculated average CH4 concentration was 321 mmol/L pore water. This CH4 concentration is about 2.7 times higher than the calculated in-situ CH4 solubility (120 mmol/L pore water; temperature (T) at 2 mbsf = 31.33 °C; salinity (S) = 10 psu; following equations by Tishchenko et al.41). The stable carbon and hydrogen isotopic composition of methane (δ13C-CH4; δD-CH4) ranged from −36.6 to −41.6‰ V-PDB and from −143.9 to −156.0‰ V-SMOW, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1.
GeoB-identifier, sampling tool, location (WGS84), and water depth of stations for gravity cores and samples of gas analyses (see Fig. 2 for positions) with molecular hydrocarbon ratios (C1/C2+, C2/C3), stable C isotope signatures (δ13C, in ‰ V-PDB) of methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6), propane (C3H8), and stable H isotope signatures (δD, in ‰ V-SMOW) of CH4.
| GeoB-No. | Sample Type | Lat/N | Lon/E | Site | C1/C2+ | C2/C3 | CH4 (δ13C) | C2H6 (δ13C) | C3H8 (δ13C) | CH4 (δD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19221-7 | GBS | 38°37.095′ | 17°11.602′ | Seep, Site 1 | *2249 | *138 | *−48.6 | *−21.6 | *−12.5 | −181.4 |
| 19224-2 | GBS | 38°36.096′ | 17°12.571′ | Seep, Site 2 | 859 | — | −44.7 | — | — | −176.0 |
| 19249-5 | GBS | 38°35.429′ | 17°11.960′ | Seep, Site 4 | 1259 | — | −46.7 | — | — | −182.6 |
| 19240-2 | GBS | 38°35.458′ | 17°12.022′ | Seep, Site 5 | *1360 | *140 | *−47.3 | *−22.3 | *−17.7 | −181.0 |
| 19251-1 | DAPC | 38°36.452′ | 17°11.224′ | Extrusion site | 92 | 8 | −37.4 | −27 | −21.3 | −148.2 |
| 19245-1 | GC | 38°36.455′ | 17°11.223′ | Extrusion site | — | — | −37.4 | — | — | −153.8 |
| 19263-1 | GC | 38°36.448′′ | 17°11.282′ | Mudflow | — | — | −41.3 | — | — | −155.9 |
| 19268-1 | DAPC | 38°36.450′ | 17°11.282′ | Mudflow | 107 | 22 | −41.6 | — | — | −156.0 |
| 19276-1 | GC | 38°36.393′ | 17°11.348′ | Mudflow | — | — | −36.6 | — | — | −143.9 |
| 19287-1 | DAPC | 38°36.394′ | 17°11.361′ | Mudflow | 78 | 25 | −36.6 | — | — | −148.7 |
| 19237-1 | GC | 38°35.930′ | 17°11.828′ | Mudflow | — | — | −37.4 | — | — | −148.5 |
*Values from Blumenberg et al.51.
DAPC = Dynamic Autoclave Piston Corer; GBS = Gas bubble sampler; GC = Gravity corer.
Chloride concentrations in fluids extracted from mud breccia outflows at the extrusion site on the western summit, decreased from bottom water values of 618 mmol/L at the sediment surface to 128 mmol/L at 14 cmbsf (Fig. 4a). Gravity core GeoB19245-1 from the extrusion site confirmed that low chlorinity fluids (125 mmol/L at minimum) extended down to 5 mbsf.
Figure 4.
Pore water profiles of chloride (a) and sulfate (b) from the western summit of Venere MV (triangles) and from peripheral seeps (circles). Locations of gravity cores GeoB19245-1 and GeoB19236-1 in Fig. 2; locations of push cores in supplementary Table S2. Red stars show ambient bottom water concentrations of chloride (618 mmol/L) and sulfate (32 mmol/L), respectively; mbsf = meters below seafloor; data tables are provided in supplementary Tables S3–S13.
Gas and fluid compositions at peripheral seeps
Pore fluid samples in gravity cores and push cores obtained from peripheral seeps (Sites 1, 2, 4 and 5, Fig. 2) showed chloride concentrations within 4% of bottom water values to depths up to 2 mbsf (Fig. 4a). All peripheral seeps hosted abundant chemosynthetic macrofauna and authigenic carbonate crusts (Fig. 3c–e). These are indicative of a shallow zone of anaerobic methane oxidation, consistent with measured steep sulfate gradients and sulfate-methane transitions at depths of <25 cmbsf (Fig. 4b). The discharged gas at peripheral seeps was composed primarily of methane but also contained ethane (C2) and propane (C3). Gas bubbles sampled at the peripheral seeps had C1/C2+ ratios of 859–2249, with δ13C-CH4 and δD-CH4 ranging from −44.7 to −48.6‰ V-PDB and from −176.0‰ to −182.6 V-SMOW, respectively (Table 1).
Sediment temperatures at the extrusion site and the peripheral seeps versus gas hydrate stability
In the mud breccia at the extrusion site (Fig. 2) the maximum temperature, measured at 40 cm above the tip of a 5 m gravity core barrel (GeoB19248-2), was 26.8 °C. This is 13 °C higher than average bottom water temperatures. In addition, sediment temperatures above 20 °C were repeatedly measured below 0.5 mbsf (meters below seafloor). The average of linear temperature gradients calculated for the mudflow at the extrusion site amounted to 8.76 °C/m (supplementary Table S1). Regardless of their crystal structure specific stability, gas hydrates would only be stable within 30 cm of the seafloor (supplementary Fig. S1).
Averages of linear temperature gradients close to the gas emission sites at the peripheral seeps ranged from 0.15–0.20 °C/m (supplement Table S1). Using these gradients, the calculated base of the gas hydrate stability at the seeps is located 8–10 mbsf (supplement Fig. S1). Seafloor sampling of some of the seeps with the ROV resulted in the release of flake-like white particles (several mm in diameter) that rose into the water column, suggesting the subsurface presence of small amounts of gas hydrates, associated with seepage along the ring faults.
Deep fluid sources
The recent mud breccia outflows are rich in gas. In-situ methane concentrations exceeding CH4 solubility by up to 2.7 times as determined for pressure cores imply that a large fraction of the pore space was still occupied by gaseous methane. High gas contents are also consistent with the mousse-like sediment textures observed in unpressurized cores. Using the classification by Whiticar42 (supplementary Fig. S4a,b), the molecular composition of hydrocarbons and isotopic compositions of methane (Table 1), point to a thermogenic origin for the hydrocarbons transported within the mud breccia of Venere MV.
Formation temperatures range from ~70 °C for the early thermogenic hydrocarbons to upwards of 150 °C for late thermogenic, methane-rich gas production systems43–45. Venere MV lies midway between geothermal gradients as low as 0.013 °C/m offshore and 0.024–0.030 °C/m onshore46. Using an average geothermal gradient of 0.020 °C/m at the location of Venere MV, and thermogenic temperatures of 70–150 °C, the presence of thermogenic hydrocarbons in the mud breccia outflows suggests a source located at least 3.5 km and potentially >7.5 km below seafloor. This depth range corresponds to empirically determined burial depths for source rocks within the thermogenic window (e.g. Quigley and Mackenzie44). This does not preclude the occurrence of a pressurized reservoir trapping these gases at shallower depths (i.e. cooler temperatures) below Venere MV.
Mud breccia at the western summit of Venere MV is also characterized by pore water freshening (Fig. 4a). The magnitude of chloride depletion and the abrupt reduction within the uppermost 10 to 20 cmbsf document an upward advective aqueous component in the extruding mud. The continuously low chloride concentrations at depth indicate that the freshening is unlikely to be associated with gas hydrate decomposition, which would instead cause discrete low-chloride spikes (e.g. Torres et al.47). An absence of gas hydrates at the western summit of Venere MV is consistent with measured sediment temperatures, which shift mud breccia at >30 cmbsf outside the gas hydrate stability zone (supplementary Fig. S1). Instead, the pore water profiles are consistent with extrusion of mud breccia containing fresh fluids sourced at depth, likely driven by mineral dehydration reactions, such as the transformation of smectite to illite, which takes place at temperatures between ~60 and 150 °C48. Pore-water freshening has also been observed in MVs on the Mediterranean Ridge, where the freshening has been attributed to mineral dehydration during smectite-illite transition at depths of 3.5–7 km21. At Venere MV, assuming a regional geothermal gradient of 0.02 °C/m (as above), the temperature range of 60–150 °C translates to fluid generation at 3–7.5 km, in accordance with the formation depths required by the thermogenic hydrocarbons.
These results indicate that formation of thermogenic hydrocarbons and water release by mineral dehydration reactions led to the generation of the fluids that are associated to the mud breccia at Venere MV. These processes require temperatures ≥60 °C that, at the location of Venere MV, indicate source depths exceeding 3 km. These depths lie well below those of the inferred depth range of Messinian deposits interpreted to occur in the Crotone forearc basin (Fig. 1d32). On the CAP, MV sources have previously been inferred to underlie the forearc-basin sediments based on mud breccia compositions containing fossils and clasts derived from strata as old as Cretaceous2,38,39. It is unknown if Messinian deposits in the Crotone forearc basins contain evaporites, however, at Venere MV the mud breccia containing strongly freshened pore waters offers no evidence of interactions with Messinian evaporites during their rise from depth. One possibility is that Messinian deposits, if present in the sedimentary succession below the location of Venere MV, did not contain evaporites. This possibility is in accordance with other studies, which found that MVs in the eastern Mediterranean region preferably developed at sites where Messinian deposits are thin or absent18,25,32,36 or cut by deep-seated faults acting as fluid-migration pathways18,24. Another option is that, over time, fluid migration through the plumbing system beneath Venere MV has removed any Messinian evaporites.
Upward-branching plumbing system
Gas seepage and outflow of fluid-rich muds along MV ring-faults is known from studies on land and typically characterizes quiescent phases of MVs8,49. However, the processes leading to the co-occurrence of quiescent-type activity and active mud breccia extrusions are not well understood. Based on observations of the prevailing seafloor morphologies and processes, and analyses of pore fluid (gas and water) compositions of samples from Venere MV, a conceptual model of its plumbing system is proposed that inter-relates extrusive processes, ring-faulting, fluid seepage and seafloor ecosystems (Fig. 5).
Figure 5.
Conceptual model of the upward-branching plumbing system. Gas-rich mud breccia supply (black arrows) through active conduit (solid light grey line) of main plumbing system from depth to the summit of the western MV cone; the stippled light grey line represents a presumably inactive conduit at the eastern cone, dark grey wedges represent buried mud breccia deposits and red stippled lines represent ring faults. Gas diverted laterally from the main conduit (long blue arrows in light grey area) migrates upward (short blue arrows) and may mix with gas of shallow origin (indicated by curved blue arrows). Gas discharge occurs at peripheral seeps (blue circles represent free gas).
The rough surface structure of exposed mud breccia observed at and below the extrusion site (Fig. 3a,b) together with the lack of sedimentary drape on the most recent mudflow indicate that these deposits are fresh. The lack of cold seep features (carbonate, chemosynthetic communities) is also consistent with a dynamic sedimentary environment. The high sediment temperatures measured within the extrusion site are also consistent with recent or even on-going extrusion, as are pore water profiles with steep sulfate gradients documenting the advection of sulfate-depleted mud (Fig. 4b). Calculations of ascent rates of the mud breccia, based on the observed clast sizes (up to 10 cm), provide an order of magnitude estimate of 1.7*10−5 to 1.7*10−4 m/s (see supplementary material for calculations). The resulting estimate of the mud breccia flux through the conduit of 3800 to 38000 m3/year fits well with published rates of 5000 to 47000 m3/year for mud breccia extrusions at Venere MV over the last ~882 years27.
The deeply-rooting conduit inferred to rise beneath the western summit is encircled by inward-dipping ring-faults. Gas discharge at peripheral sites indicates that fluids are migrating along the faults. The peripheral seeps of Venere MV are so far the only sites on the CAP from which extensive chemosynthesis-based communities associated with gas emissions and authigenic carbonate deposits have been documented. These observations indicate a long-term upward supply of dissolved methane at Venere MV. The presence of decimetre-thick authigenic carbonates in particular indicate persistent gas seepage over timescales of thousands of years27. Considering the timing of mud breccia extrusions from the western cone (recent to on-going) and the quiescent-type gas release along the ring faults (long-term and on-going) it is argued that both processes have been occurring coevally.
The development of the caldera at Venere MV has been proposed to result from the long-term extrusive activity involving material withdrawal from the subsurface and thus linking active mud volcanism to caldera subsidence involving ring-fault movements27. Faults bordering MV edifices are a known features of submarine MVs (e.g. Paull et al.50). In a deep-marine environment, however, the high-resolution bathymetric dataset presented here reveals in unprecedented detail the seafloor expression of a ring-fault bounded caldera with sites of active fluid release along it. The stable carbon and hydrogen isotopic signatures of methane collected at the peripheral seeps (Table 1) indicate a thermogenic methane source using the classification by Whiticar42 (supplementary Fig. S4a). This is in agreement with results obtained by Blumenberg et al.51 who documented the presence of methane, ethane, and propane in gas from the peripheral seeps (Table 1), and attributed a thermogenic origin for this gas. C1/C2+ ratios determined for the gas, however, are higher than expected for hydrocarbons from an exclusive thermogenic source (see also supplementary Fig. S4b). Several post-genetic processes can account for the molecular and isotopic relationships of hydrocarbons at the peripheral seeps: admixture of shallow microbial methane during fluid ascent; secondary microbial methane generation leading to drier gas with relatively more negative δ13C-CH4 values52,53; and segregation effects during gas transport through porous, aqueous sediments54.
Nevertheless, the gas discharging at the periphery of Venere MV clearly contains thermogenic hydrocarbons (C2 and C3; Table 1) as the mud breccia extruded through the main conduit at the western summit. It is therefore argued that the thermogenic fraction of the gas released at the peripheral seeps branched upward and laterally away from the main MV conduit (Fig. 5). Furthermore, the ring faults act as natural migration pathways for gas but not for mud breccia. It appears that the overpressured gas undergoes upward divergence as it migrates through faults and microfractures of the ring-fault system. Similar lateral fluid migration has been previously proposed to occur at MVs, at depths where overpressured fluids experience lower surrounding pressures4. As shown for the sediment-hosted hydrothermal system of the Lusi site in Indonesia, divergent fluid migration along faults of collapsing calderas takes more time than focused flow along the main conduit55. This may result in changes in the composition of vented gases. At Venere MV, the longer distances and possibly slower flow of gas along the ring-fault system may have promoted the admixing of shallow microbial methane and contributed to changes in the gas molecular composition (Fig. 5). Both admixture and migration processes typically contribute to an increase in the C1/C2+ ratio and manifest through more negative δ13C-CH4 values, as observed at gas emitted at the peripheral seeps (Table 1).
Mud volcanism in general is driven by the cyclic build-up of subsurface overpressure triggering the material release56. In the proposed model (Fig. 5), the ring faults are argued to respond to variations in pore pressures linked to fluid pulses from the deeper plumbing system. During phases of high pore fluid pressures the ring faults facilitate the diversion of an overpressured gas phase to the periphery of the MV. In turn, variations in pore pressures may facilitate movement on the ring-faults (e.g. leading to caldera collapse). For most offshore MVs, their dynamics and variability of activity remain unknown. More quantitative information on fluid and sediment amounts involved is essential to constrain the global contribution of MVs to material fluxes at geosphere-hydrosphere interfaces. Advances in hydroacoustic and visual imaging technologies and the use of AUVs broaden the capabilities in identifying and investigating seafloor seep sites expressing various forms of activity.
Conclusion
The first visual evidence of active gas emissions on the CAP is reported. Among over 50 MVs, only Venere MV was encountered to show activity during systematic hydroacoustic investigations of the CAP in November– December 2014. Contrasting to previous assumptions on fluid dynamics associated to mud volcanism, this study reveals that two fluid domains can co-exist: 1) mud breccia outflows, extrusion of thermogenic hydrocarbons, and freshened pore waters at a summit site; and 2) long term advective seepage of methane fuelling cold-seep communities at sites along peripheral ring-faults. Mud breccia extrusion, gas release along peripheral seeps, and caldera ring-faulting appear to be linked and sustained by persistently high pore fluid pressures. Fluids discharging with mud breccia at the summit are generated by thermogenic organic matter degradation and mineral dehydration reactions occurring at depths of >3 km. This formation depth implies that fluid sources are located below the Messinian to Recent sedimentary infilling of the Crotone forearc basin. Freshened pore waters indicated that Messinian evaporites are either not present or have been removed by fluid migration from below Venere MV.
Considering the presence of thermogenic hydrocarbons in both fluid domains, it is inferred that seepage at Venere MV involves an upward-branching plumbing system and that overpressured gas diverted laterally from the main MV conduit migrates upward and mixes with gas of shallow origin. As a result, chemosynthesis-based communities that rely on persistent fluid supply and thick authigenic carbonates are limited to the peripheral seeps along the ring faults of the caldera. An upward-branching plumbing system that experiences high subsurface pore pressures can explain how both mud breccia discharge and quiescent-type seepage co-exist at an individual MV. Such a mechanism may allow for mud breccia discharge to be sustained over timescales exceeding the short-lived eruptions typically associated with active mud volcanism. Furthermore, the upward-branching fluid migration pathways exert an important control on the distribution of seepage-dependent chemosynthesis-based oases of life around submarine MVs.
Methods
Hydroacoustics
Multi-disciplinary investigations of Venere MV were undertaken in 2014 and 2016 during R/V METEOR cruise M11226 and R/V POSEIDON cruise POS49957. Swath bathymetry data were collected using two Kongsberg multibeam systems, a ship-borne EM122 (12 kHz) in 2014 and an EM2040 (300 kHz) carried by the autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) MARUM-SEAL 5000 in 2014 and 2016. Bathymetric datasets were processed with MB-System58. Ship-based data was gridded to 25 m lateral and meter-scale vertical resolution and AUV-based data to 1.6 m lateral and 0.1 m vertical resolution.
Sediment samples and temperature
Sediment cores up to 5 m long were acquired using a conventional gravity corer and the Dynamic Autoclave Piston Corer (DAPC), the latter allowing for retrieval of cores under in-situ pressure59. Seafloor observations, sediment sampling with push cores (30 cm long) and collection of gas bubbles from the water column were conducted using the remotely operated vehicle (ROV) MARUM QUEST 4000 m during M11226. In-situ sediment temperatures were measured using miniaturized temperature data loggers (MTLs, ANTARES Datensystem GmbH), mounted as an array of 6 sensors on a 5 m gravity core barrel or with a 60 cm long probe (T-stick; 8 sensors), inserted vertically into the sediment using the ROV60.
Pore water and gas analysis
Pore fluids were extracted from gravity cores and push cores using rhizon samplers. Sulphate and chloride concentrations were determined by ion-chromatography (“882 Compact IC plus 1” by Metrohm on a “Metrosep A Supp 5” column) with an analytical error below 0.4% for both anions. Hydrocarbon data was generated from sediment by headspace technique61; from gas bubble sampling under in-situ pressures over the seeps using the ROV (Fig. 3c); and from the DAPC59. Methane ex situ concentrations and hydrocarbon compositions were analysed during M112 by gas chromatography15. Stable carbon and hydrogen isotope ratios (13C/12C; 2H/1H) of methane (CH4) were determined by gas chromatography coupled to isotope ratio mass spectrometry (GC-IRMS) at MARUM. Repeated analyses of standards gave a reproducibility for C1/C2+ ratios, stable carbon, and hydrogen isotope ratios of ≤2%, 0.5% and 1%, respectively. Values of ethane (C2) and propane (C3) for GeoB19251-1 were analyzed by GEO-data (Environmental-Laboratory in Garbsen, Germany).
Gas hydrate stability calculation
The gas hydrate phase boundary (supplementary Fig. S1) was calculated with the program HWHYD62. Calculations were performed for gas compositions obtained from mud breccia (extrusion site at western summit; Fig. 2b) and gas bubbles (peripheral seeps, Sites 1, 2, 4 and 5). Salinities of 10 PSU (freshened pore water values in mud breccia) and 38.5 PSU (bottom water values at peripheral seeps, Sites 1, 2, 4 and 5) were used as input. Conductivity, temperature, and depth (CTD) measurements were recorded above each site by a Sea Bird Electronics SBE9plus probe26. Temperature gradients (supplement Table S1) were calculated from temperatures in shallow sediments at the seep sites. Averaged gradients were used at sites where repeated temperature measurements were carried out. The gradients were extrapolated to determine the base of the gas hydrate stability zone (BGHSZ) at the seeps (supplement Fig. S1).
Data availability
Relevant data will be made available on PANGAEA® (www.pangaea.de).
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the masters and crews of cruises R/V METEOR M112 and RV POSEIDON POS499. The teams of the MARUM AUV SEAL 5000 and ROV QUEST 4000 m are acknowledged. Marvin Lilley (at the ETH Zürich) is thanked for isotope cross-measurements on selected methane samples. The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the Research Center/Excellence Cluster “The Ocean in the Earth System” provided funding for expeditions M112 and POS499. Marta Torres acknowledges support through a fellowship from the Hanse Wissenschaftskolleg. Daniel Praeg acknowledges funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 656821 (project SEAGAS).
Author Contributions
Conception and design of the study was carried out by M.L., H.S., and G.B. M.L. drafted the manuscript with additional input from D.P., T.P., M.T. and in close discussion with Y.M., M.R., P.W., and H.S. Gas analyses carried out at MARUM were done by T.P. Y.M. coordinated ROV dives and sampling during M112. M.R. planned hydroacoustic surveys during M112 and extracted gas flares from water column data. P.W. processed MBES data (EM122 and EM2040). M.T. carried out pore water analyses. D.P. provided valuable intellectual contributions to the geological setting and conceptual model. H.S. provided technical and intellectual support as co-chief scientist of M112 and G.B. as chief scientist of M112 and POS499.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-24689-1.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
M. Loher, Email: mloher@marum.de
G. Bohrmann, Email: gbohrmann@marum.de
References
- 1.Pape T, et al. Hydrocarbon seepage and its sources at mud volcanoes of the Kumano forearc basin, Nankai Trough subduction zone. Geochem Geophy Geosy. 2014;15:2180–2194. doi: 10.1002/2013GC005057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Praeg D, Ceramicola S, Barbieri R, Unnithan V, Wardell N. Tectonically-driven mud volcanism since the late Pliocene on the Calabrian accretionary prism, central Mediterranean Sea. Mar Petrol Geol. 2009;26:1849–1865. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.03.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kopf, A. J. Significance of mud volcanism. Rev Geophys40, 10.1029/2000rg000093 (2002).
- 4.Deville É, et al. The origin and processes of mud volcanism: New insights from Trinidad. Subsurface Sediment Mobilization. 2003;216:475–490. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dimitrov LI. Mud volcanoes - the most important pathway for degassing deeply buried sediments. Earth-Sci Rev. 2002;59:49–76. doi: 10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00069-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Etiope G, Ciccioli P. Earth’s Degassing: A Missing Ethane and Propane Source. Science. 2009;323:478. doi: 10.1126/science.1165904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mazzini A, Etiope G. Mud volcanism: An updated review. Earth-Sci Rev. 2017;168:81–112. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Planke S, Svensen H, Hovland M, Banks DA, Jamtveit B. Mud and fluid migration in active mud volcanoes in Azerbaijan. Geo-Mar Lett. 2003;23:258–268. doi: 10.1007/s00367-003-0152-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Evans RJ, Stewart SA, Davies RJ. The structure and formation of mud volcano summit calderas. J Geol Soc London. 2008;165:769–780. doi: 10.1144/0016-76492007-118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Milkov AV. Worldwide distribution of submarine mud volcanoes and associated gas hydrates. Mar Geol. 2000;167:29–42. doi: 10.1016/S0025-3227(00)00022-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sahling H, et al. Vodyanitskii mud volcano, Sorokin trough, Black Sea: Geological characterization and quantification of gas bubble streams. Mar Petrol Geol. 2009;26:1799–1811. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.01.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bohrmann G, et al. Mud volcanoes and gas hydrates in the Black Sea: new data from Dvurechenskii and Odessa mud volcanoes. Geo-Mar Lett. 2003;23:239–249. doi: 10.1007/s00367-003-0157-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Feseker T, et al. Eruption of a deep-sea mud volcano triggers rapid sediment movement. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5385. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Foucher J-P, et al. Changes in seabed morphology, mud temperature and free gas venting at the Håkon Mosby mud volcano, offshore northern Norway, over the time period 2003–2006. Geo-Mar Lett. 2010;30:157–167. doi: 10.1007/s00367-010-0193-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pape T, et al. Gas hydrates in shallow deposits of the Amsterdam mud volcano, Anaximander Mountains, Northeastern Mediterranean Sea. Geo-Mar Lett. 2010;30:187–206. doi: 10.1007/s00367-010-0197-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Suess E. Marine cold seeps and their manifestations: geological control, biogeochemical criteria and environmental conditions. Int J Earth Sci. 2014;103:1889–1916. doi: 10.1007/s00531-014-1010-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Higgins GE, Saunders JB. Mud volcanoes – Their nature and origin. Verh. Naturforsch. Ges. Basel. 1974;84:101–152. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mascle, J. et al. Distribution and geological control of mud volcanoes and other fluid/free gas seepage features in the Mediterranean Sea and nearby Gulf of Cadiz. Geo-Mar Lett, 1–22, 10.1007/s00367-014-0356-4 (2014).
- 19.Robertson, A. et al. Mud volcanism on the Mediterranean Ridge: Initial results of Ocean Drilling Program Leg 160. Geology24, 239–242, https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024 0239:Mvotmr 2.3.Co;2 (1996).
- 20.Kopf A, Robertson AHF, Clennell MB, Flecker R. Mechanisms of mud extrusion on the Mediterranean Ridge Accretionary Complex. Geo-Mar Lett. 1998;18:97–114. doi: 10.1007/s003670050058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dählmann A, De Lange G. Fluid-sediment interactions at Eastern Mediterranean mud volcanoes: a stable isotope study from ODP Leg 160. Earth Planet Sc Lett. 2003;212:377–391. doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00227-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Woodside, J. M., Ivanov, M. K., Limonov, A. F. & expedition, S. s. o. t. a. in Gas Hydrates: Relevance to World Margin Stability and Climate Change Vol. 137 Special Publications (eds Henriet, J. P. & Mienert, J.) 177–193 (Geological Society, 1998).
- 23.Huguen C, et al. Menes caldera, a highly active site of brine seepage in the Eastern Mediterranean sea: “In situ” observations from the NAUTINIL expedition (2003) Mar Geol. 2009;261:138–152. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2009.02.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dupré, S. et al. Warm brine lakes in craters of active mud volcanoes, Menes caldera off NW Egypt: evidence for deep-rooted thermogenic processes. Geo-Mar Lett, 1–16, 10.1007/s00367-014-0367-1 (2014).
- 25.Ceramicola S, Praeg D, Cova A, Accettella D, Zecchin M. Seafloor distribution and last glacial to postglacial activity of mud volcanoes on the Calabrian accretionary prism, Ionian Sea. Geo-Mar Lett. 2014;34:111–129. doi: 10.1007/s00367-013-0354-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bohrmann G, et al. Report and preliminary results of R/V METEOR cruise M112, Dynamic of Mud Volcanoes and Seeps in the Calabrian AccretionaryPrism, Ionian Sea, Catania (Italy) – Catania (Italy), November 6 – December 15, 2014. Berichte, MARUM – Zentrum für Marine Umweltwissenschaften, Fachbereich Geowissenschaften, Universität Bremen. 2015;No. 306:217. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Loher, M. et al. Mud Volcanism in a Canyon: Morphodynamic Evolution of the Active Venere Mud Volcano and Its Interplay With Squillace Canyon, Central Mediterranean. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, n/a-n/a, 10.1002/2017gc007166 (2018).
- 28.Malinverno A, Ryan WBF. Extension in the Tyrrhenian Sea and shortening in the Apennines as result of arc migration driven by sinking of the lithosphere. Tectonics. 1986;5:227–245. doi: 10.1029/TC005i002p00227. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gueguen E, Doglioni C, Fernandez M. On the post-25 Ma geodynamic evolution of the western Mediterranean. Tectonophysics. 1998;298:259–269. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(98)00189-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rossi S, Sartori R. A Seismic-Reflection Study of the External Calabrian Arc in the Northern Ionian Sea (Eastern Mediterranean) Marine Geophysical Researches. 1981;4:403–426. doi: 10.1007/BF00286036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Minelli, L. & Faccenna, C. Evolution of the Calabrian accretionary wedge (central Mediterranean). Tectonics29, 10.1029/2009tc002562 (2010).
- 32.Polonia, A. et al. The Calabrian Arc subduction complex in the Ionian Sea: Regional architecture, active deformation, and seismic hazard. Tectonics30, 10.1029/2010tc002821 (2011).
- 33.Gutscher M-A, et al. Active tectonics of the Calabrian subduction revealed by new multi-beam bathymetric data and high-resolution seismic profiles in the Ionian Sea (Central Mediterranean) Earth Planet Sc Lett. 2017;461:61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.12.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Roda C. Distribuzione e facies dei sedimenti Neogenici nel Bacino Crotonese. Geol. Romana. 1964;3:319–366. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zecchin M, Massari F, Mellere D, Prosser G. Architectural styles of prograding wedges in a tectonically active setting, Crotone Basin, Southern Italy. J Geol Soc London. 2003;160:863–880. doi: 10.1144/0016-764902-099. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Capozzi R, et al. Neogene to Quaternary tectonics and mud diapirism in the Gulf of Squillace (Crotone-Spartivento Basin, Calabrian Arc, Italy) Mar Petrol Geol. 2012;35:219–234. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2012.01.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cernobori L, et al. Crustal image of the Ionian basin and its Calabrian margins. Tectonophysics. 1996;264:175–189. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(96)00125-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Panieri G, et al. Mud volcanoes along the inner deformation front of the Calabrian Arc accretionary wedge (Ionian Sea) Mar Geol. 2013;336:84–98. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2012.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Morlotti E, Sartori R, Torelli L, Barbieri F, Raffi I. Chaotic deposits fromthe external Calabrian Arc (Ionian Sea, easternMediterranean) Mem Soc Geol Ital. 1982;24:261–275. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Foucher JP, et al. Structure and Drivers of Cold Seep Ecosystems. Oceanography. 2009;22:92–109. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2009.11. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tishchenko P, Hensen C, Wallmann K, Wong CS. Calculation of the stability and solubility of methane hydrate in seawater. Chem Geol. 2005;219:37–52. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.02.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Whiticar MJ. Carbon and hydrogen isotope systematics of bacterial formation and oxidation of methane. Chem Geol. 1999;161:291–314. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00092-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Claypool GE, Kvenvolden KA. Methane and Other Hydrocarbon Gases in Marine Sediment. Annu Rev Earth Pl Sc. 1983;11:299–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ea.11.050183.001503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Quigley TM, Mackenzie AS. The Temperatures of Oil and Gas-Formation in the Sub-Surface. Nature. 1988;333:549–552. doi: 10.1038/333549a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hunt, J. M. Petroleum Geochemistry and Geology. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York (1996).
- 46.Pollack, H. N., Hurter, S. J. & Johnson, J. R. A New Global Heat Flow Compilation. International Heat Flow Commission database. available via the IHFC website, http://www.heatflow.und.edu/ (10/2016) (1991).
- 47.Torres, M. E., Teichert, B. M. A., Tréhu, A., Borowski, W. & Tomaru, H. Relationship of pore water freshening to accretionary processes in the Cascadia margin: Fluid sources and gas hydrate abundance. Geophys Res Lett31, 10.1029/2004GL021219 (2004).
- 48.Kastner, M., Solomon, E. A., Harris, R. N. & Torres, M. E. In Developments in Marine Geology Vol. Volume 7 (eds Donna K. Blackman Fumio Inagaki Ruediger Stein & Larsen Hans-Christian) 671–733 (Elsevier, 2014).
- 49.Mazzini A, et al. When mud volcanoes sleep: Insight from seep geochemistry at the Dashgil mud volcano, Azerbaijan. Mar Petrol Geol. 2009;26:1704–1715. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2008.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Paull CK, et al. Active mud volcanoes on the continental slope of the Canadian Beaufort Sea. Geochem Geophy Geosy. 2015;16:3160–3181. doi: 10.1002/2015GC005928. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Blumenberg M, Pape T, Seifert R, Bohrmann G, Schlömer S. Can hydrocarbons entrapped in seep carbonates serve as gas geochemistry recorder? Geo-Mar Lett. 2017 [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pallasser RJ. Recognising biodegradation in gas/oil accumulations through the delta C-13 compositions of gas components. Org Geochem. 2000;31:1363–1373. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00101-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hong WL, Torres ME, Kim JH, Choi J, Bahk JJ. Carbon cycling within the sulfate-methane-transition-zone in marine sediments from the Ulleung Basin. Biogeochemistry. 2013;115:129–148. doi: 10.1007/s10533-012-9824-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Prinzhofer A, Mello MR, Takaki T. Geochemical characterization of natural gas: A physical multivariable approach and its applications in maturity and migration estimates. Aapg Bull. 2000;84:1152–1172. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mazzini A, Etiope G, Svensen H. A new hydrothermal scenario for the 2006 Lusi eruption, Indonesia. Insights from gas geochemistry. Earth Planet Sc Lett. 2012;317:305–318. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Deville E, Guerlais SH. Cyclic activity of mud volcanoes: Evidences from Trinidad (SE Caribbean) Mar Petrol Geol. 2009;26:1681–1691. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.03.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Bohrmann G, et al. Report and preliminary results of R/V POSEIDON cruise POS499, Calabrian Mud Volcanoes, Catania (Italy) – Catania (Italy), 04 May – 22 May, 2016. Berichte, MARUM – Zentrum für Marine Umweltwissenschaften, Fachbereich Geowissenschaften, Universität Bremen. 2016;311:76. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Caress DW, Chayes DN. Improved processing of Hydrosweep DS multibeam data on the R/V Maurice Ewing. Marine Geophysical Researches. 1996;18:631–650. doi: 10.1007/BF00313878. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Abegg F, Hohnberg HJ, Pape T, Bohrmann G, Freitag J. Development and application of pressure-core-sampling systems for the investigation of gas- and gas-hydrate-bearing sediments. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers. 2008;55:1590–1599. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2008.06.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Feseker T, Wetzel G, Heesemann B. Introducing the T-Stick: A new device for high precision in situ sediment temperature profile measurements. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods. 2012;10:31–40. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kvenvolden, K. A. & McDonald, T. J. Organic geochemistry on the JOIDES Resolution—an assay. ODP Tech. Note6, 10.2973/odp.tn.6.1986 (1986).
- 62.Masoudi R, Tohidi B. Estimating the hydrate zone in the presence of salts and/or organic inhibitors using water partial pressure. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2005;46:23–36. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2004.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Relevant data will be made available on PANGAEA® (www.pangaea.de).





