ABSTRACT
Neonatal meningitis-causing Escherichia coli isolates (SP-4, SP-5, SP-13, SP-46, and SP-65) were recovered between 1989 and 1997 from infants in the Netherlands. Here, we report the draft genome sequences of these five E. coli isolates, which are currently being used to validate food safety processing technologies.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Neonatal meningitis-associated Escherichia coli (NMEC) strains are one of the leading causes of neonatal bacterial meningitis, associated with 15% to 40% mortality and morbidity rates and severe neurological defects in surviving neonates (1). The pathogenesis of NMEC disease involves cross-contamination from the mother’s feces during birth, followed by neonatal gastrointestinal (GI) tract colonization and subsequent neonatal sepsis. NMEC strains are able to survive and multiply to high titers in the bloodstream of neonates, which allows them to invade the central nervous system and cause meningitis (1–3). Of the approximately 180 serogroups of E. coli, those preferentially associated with NMEC strains include O1, O7, O12, O18, and O83 (4, 5). The five present study isolates were recovered from the cerebrospinal fluid of neonates with bacterial meningitis in the Netherlands between 1989 and 1997 (6). NMEC-like strains are present in some foods (7), consistent with possible foodborne transmission. These five isolates, along with other extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) types, are currently being used to validate food safety intervention technologies (8).
Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and quantified using a Qubit 3.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). The genomic DNA library was prepared using the Nextera Flex DNA library prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA), which generated ca. 600-bp fragments. Libraries were analyzed for concentration, pooled, and denatured for loading onto a flow cell for cluster generation. Denatured libraries were sequenced on an Illumina MiniSeq platform with 2 × 151-bp reads using a paired-end protocol with 50× coverage. Single or duplicate Illumina reads were assembled de novo using SPAdes (version 3.9.0). Virulence factors, antibiotic resistances, sequence types, mRNA, rRNA, tRNA, genes, pseudogenes, and coding sequences (CDSs) were determined using the Illumina Bacterial Analysis Pipeline (version 1.0.4) and the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP; version 4.3). The accession numbers and assembly metrics are listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Accession numbers and assembly metrics of five draft whole-genome sequences for Escherichia coli
| Isolate | Serotype | GenBank accession no. | Genome size (bp) | G+C content (%) | BioProject no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP-4 | O18:K1 | PNYE00000000 | 4,894,710 | 50.71 | PRJNA422252 |
| SP-5 | O7:K1 | PNYF00000000 | 5,324,549 | 50.52 | PRJNA422419 |
| SP-13 | O18:K1 | PNYD00000000 | 5,161,293 | 50.59 | PRJNA422418 |
| SP-46 | O7:K1 | POSV00000000 | 5,260,766 | 50.54 | PRJNA429215 |
| SP-65 | O83:K1 | POSW00000000 | 3,911,002 | 50.39 | PRJNA429216 |
Genomics data are now considered an integral part of risk assessment for food safety and environmental microbiology (9). These genomic data will be useful for understanding NMEC pathogenesis and should provide novel insights regarding the persistence of NMEC strains in foods and effective food safety interventions against such strains.
Accession number(s).
The whole-genome shotgun projects reported here have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers and BioProject numbers listed in Table 1. The versions described in this paper are the second versions, PNYE02000000, PNYF02000000, PNYD02000000, POSV02000000, and POSW02000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis, including past director Lodewijk Spanaard, for collection of the isolates, and Erin Reichenberger, David Needleman, and Brian Johnston for assistance on this project.
This work was supported primarily by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)-Agricultural Research Service National Program Project 108 Food Safety Project 8072-42000-078-00D (C.S.) and secondarily by the Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) (J.R.J.).
Mention of brand names, manufacturers, or trademarks is not considered an endorsement by the USDA or the VA.
Footnotes
Citation Xu A, Johnson JR, Sheen S, Sommers C. 2018. Draft genome sequences of five neonatal meningitis-causing Escherichia coli isolates (SP-4, SP-5, SP-13, SP-46, and SP-65). Genome Announc 6:e00091-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00091-18.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kaper J, Nataro P, Mobley T. 2004. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:123–140. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bonacorsi S, Bingen E. 2005. Molecular epidemiology of Escherichia coli causing neonatal meningitis. Int J Med Microbiol 295:373–381. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Glode M, Sutton A, Moxon E, Robbins J. 1977. Pathogenesis of neonatal Escherichia coli meningitis: induction of bacteremia and meningitis in infant rats fed E. coli K1. Infect Immun 16:75–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wijetunge D, Gongati S, Debroy C, Kim S, Couraud O, Romero A, Weksler B, Kariyawasam S. 2015. Characterizing the pathotype of neonatal meningitis causing Escherichia coli (NMEC). BMC Microbiol 15:211. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0547-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Logue CM, Doetkott C, Mangiamele P, Wannemuehler YM, Johnson TJ, Tivendale KA, Li G, Sherwood JS, Nolan LK. 2012. Genotypic and phenotypic traits that distinguish neonatal meningitis-associated Escherichia coli from fecal E. coli isolates of healthy human hosts. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:5824–5830. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07869-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Johnson JR, Oswald E, O’Bryan TT, Kuskowski MA, Spanjaard L. 2002. Phylogenetic distribution of virulence-associated genes among Escherichia coli isolates associated with neonatal bacterial meningitis in the Netherlands. J Infect Dis 185:774–784. doi: 10.1086/339343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mitchell M, Johnson J, Johnston B, Curtiss R, Mellata M. 2015. Zoonotic potential of Escherichia coli isolates from retail chicken meat products and eggs. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:1177–1187. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03524-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sommers C, Scullen O, Sheen S. 2017. Inactivation of uropathogenic Escherichia coli in ground chicken meat using high pressure processing and gamma radiation, and in purge and chicken meat surfaces by ultraviolet light. Front Microbiol 7:413. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.IMRAGWG (Interagency Microbiological Risk Assessment Guideline Working Group). 2012. Microbial risk assessment guideline pathogenic microorganisms with focus on food and water USDA/FSIS/2012-001. http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/d79eaa29-c53a-451e-ba1c-36a76a6c6434/Microbial_Risk_Assessment_Guideline_2012-001.pdf?MOD=AJPERES. Accessed 30 November 2017.
