Abstract
Background
Drug resistant Tuberculosis (TB) is considered a global public health threat. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is a new technology for tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics and is capable of providing rapid drug resistance profiles and genotypes for epidemiologic surveillance. Therefore, we used WGS to determine genotypic drug resistance profiles and genetic diversity of drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Mwanza, North-western Tanzania.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Bugando Medical Centre (BMC) from September 2014 to June 2015. Consecutively, smear-positive newly diagnosed TB patients aged ≥18 years were enrolled. Sputum samples were cultured on Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) slants. Mycobacterial genomic DNA was extracted for WGS to determine drug resistant mutations for first and second line drugs as well as the spoligotypes.
Results
A total of 78 newly diagnosed patients with pulmonary TB with a median age of 37 [IQR: 30 – 46] years were enrolled. Of these, 57.8% (45/74) were males and 34.6% (27/78) were HIV infected. Mycobacterium tuberculosis genomic DNA for WGS was obtained from isolates in 74 (94.9%) patients. Of the 74 isolates, six (8.1%) isolates harbored mutations for resistance to at least one drug. The resistance to the drugs was isoniazid 3/74 (4.1%), rifampicin mono-resistant 2/74 (2.7%), ethambutol 2/74 (2.7%) and streptomycin 1/74 (1.4%). None was isoniazid mono-resistant. Of the 74 only one (1.4%) patient had MDR-TB. The resistance to ethionamide, the second line drug, was detected in one patient (1.4%). None was resistant to pyrazinamide, fluoroquinolones, kanamycin, amikacin, or capreomycin. The mutations detected were mabA-inhA promoter region C(-15)T and katG Ser513Thr for isoniazid; rpoB His526Leu and rpoB Ser531Leu for rifampicin; embB Met306Val and embB Met306Ile for ethambutol; rpsL Lys43Arg for streptomycin; and mabA-inhA promoter region C(-15)T for ethionamide. The spoligotypes of the drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis were distinct to all six isolates and belonged to T1, T2, T3-ETH, CAS1-DELHI, EAI5 and LAM11-ZWE lineages.
Conclusion
The genetic drug resistance profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from North-western Tanzania comprises of the common previously reported mutations. The prevalence of resistance to first and second line drugs including MDR-TB is low. Six drug resistant strains exhibited different spoligotypes, suggesting limited transmission of drug resistant strains in the region.
INTRODUCTION
Drug resistant Tuberculosis (DR-TB) is considered a global public health threat [1]. Globally in 2015, WHO estimated that 3.9% of new cases and 21% of previously treated cases had multi drug resistant TB (MDR-TB), defined as resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin [1]. In 2015 there were 480 000 incident cases of MDR-TB with 250 000 deaths [1]. Extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) is defined as MDR-TB with additional resistance to any fluoroquinolone and one of the second-line injectable anti-TB drugs, amikacin, capreomycin or kanamycin. By the end of 2015, XDR-TB had been reported by 117 countries with 9.5% of MDR-TB cases being XDR-TB [1]. Both MDR-TB and XDR-TB require extensive treatment with multiple, potentially toxic drugs, and treatment outcomes remain unacceptably poor. Estimates show that 52% of patients with MDR-TB and less than 30% of patients with XDR-TB survive [1], [2].
Tanzania is not among the 30 countries with the severe burden of MDR-TB in the world and in 2015 WHO estimated that 1.3% of new cases and 4.7% of previously treated cases are MDR-TB [1]. In Tanzania, since 2000 to date eight studies have reported low prevalence of phenotypic TB drug resistance with the prevalence MDR-TB ranged from 0.4 – 5.7% among new cases and from 3.9 – 11.1% among previously treated cases [3 - 10]. Among new cases resistance to isoniazid is high at a prevalence range from 3.0 – 6.3%, whereas for rifampicin it ranges from 0.5 – 5.7% [3 - 10]. Estimates by WHO in 2015 show that in Tanzania less than 1% were notified tested for rifampicin resistance among new cases and 3.0% among previously treated cases. These studies in Tanzania have reported the resistance to any of the first line TB drugs among new patients to range from 5 – 11.4% [3 - 10] with the low occurrence of resistance to rifampicin, streptomycin and ethambutol and pyrazinamide [3 - 10]. Data are very limited on reported prevalence of resistance to the second line TB drugs.
Understanding the circulating Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance mutations is vital for better TB control strategies, especially to inform a new MDR-TB treatment programme. However, in Tanzania only two studies, with a total number of 35 isolates analyzed, have reported the mutations conferring resistance to TB drugs by sequencing the M. tuberculosis genes; rpoB (rifampin), inhA (isoniazid, ethionamide), katG (isoniazid), embB (ethambutol), gyrA (fluoroquinolones), rrs (streptomycin, amikacin, kanamycin, capreomycin), eis (kanamycin) and pncA (pyrazinamide) [5, 11]. In these studies the mutations reported for isoniazid were all at 531 katG, for rifampicin were all at the 81-bp rifampicin resistance determine region (RRDR). Mutations conferring resistance to ethambutol has been reported at embB gene position 378, 306, 406 and 319, and for pyrazinamide were at pncA gene position 128; 111, 49, 179, and 169. No mutation were detected at gyrA, rrs or eis [5, 11]. One previous study has shown that the common clades circulating in this region are T, LAM, CAS, EAI and Beijing [12].
HIV infection, increased urbanization and international migration, and refugees movements; coupled with poor control of infection easily allow the spread DR-TB. There are no recent data on drug resistance and the causative mutations from North-western Tanzania. This region is surrounded by Democratic Republic of Congo, Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda and Kenya where there has been instability and reports of increased drug resistance [1]. Therefore monitoring for drug resistance is essential, though continuous surveillance system for DR-TB is resource demanding, requires finance and personnel with high expertise. The last DR-TB surveillance in Tanzania was conducted during 2005 – 2009 [1].
WHO proposed expanding rapid testing and detection of cases to tackle the global DR-TB crisis [13]. Phenotypic methods for detection of TB drug resistance are expensive, technically complex and time consuming [14], with the possibility of sample contamination or failure to grow in specific testing media. Targeted molecular tests, such as Xpert MTB/RIF and other PCR-based methods, although more rapid, only examine a limited number of target regions [15]. WGS is a newer alternative for TB diagnostics, is capable of providing rapid and comprehensive view of drug resistance profiles, species identification and genotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis within a clinically relevant timeframe [16, 17]. In addition, it provides the highest resolution when investigating outbreaks [18].
Therefore, we used WGS to determine genotypic drug resistance profiles and genetic diversity of drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from North-western Tanzania. This insight is necessary for the epidemiology of TB as it may identify mutations and genetic diversity of drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates available in the region with the ultimate goal of improving management and control of tuberculosis infection. Furthermore, it provides more information about the mutations and their differences in transmission fitness.
PATIENTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study setting and duration
This study was conducted at the Bugando Medical Centre (BMC), Mwanza Tanzania from September 2014 to June 2015. BMC is a 900-bed tertiary hospital serving a population of over 10 million people from six regions and has the Zonal TB Laboratory in North-western Tanzania (www.bugandomedicalcentre.go.tz).
Study design
This was a cross sectional study in which we enrolled, consecutively all consenting smear-positive newly diagnosed TB patients aged ≥ 18 years. Three consecutive sputum samples (spot, early morning and spot) were taken from each patient according the Tanzania National TB and Leprosy guidelines. Only the sample with the highest ZN smear grade for each patient was further processed and cultured.
Sputum sample processing and culture
Sputum samples (2.5 - 10 ml) were processed by the standard N-acetyl L-cystein (NALC)-NaOH method [19]. The sediment was reconstituted to 2.5 ml with phosphate buffer pH 6.8 [20] and inoculated on two Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) slants, one containing 0.75% glycerol and the other containing 0.6% pyruvate. LJ slants were incubated at 37°C and examined weekly for growth. Cultures were considered negative when no colonies were seen after 8 weeks.
Genomic DNA Extraction
Colonies were harvested from LJ slants for genomic DNA extraction, transferred to Tris-HCl–EDTA buffer and heated for 2 hours at 90°C. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-phenol chloroform method [21], 2 ul of isolated gDNA was quantified using NanoDrop 2000 spectrtophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). 260/280 ratio of all gDNA preps was between 1.7 and 2.0. The gDNA was diluted to 30 ng/ul and 50 ul was shipped to Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA for WGS analysis.
Whole genome sequencing
The average DNA yields were measured by Qubit fluorometry, and the success rate for WGS was evaluated. The whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed as described previously [17]. Briefly, the paired-end 250-bp DNA sequencing was carried out using the Illumina MiSeq platform following Nextera XT library prep with a 15-cycle PCR indexing step. Sequencing runs were composed fully of MTBC (15 to 17) samples. A negative control was included through each library preparation and on each sequencing run. The Wadsworth Center TB WGS bioinformatics pipeline was followed as described previously [17]. Briefly, the raw reads were mapped on the M. tuberculosis H37Rv reference genome using BWA-MEM version 0.7.12 [22]and sorted using SAMtools version 0.1.19 [23]. Read duplicates were marked using Picard tools version 1.129 (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). Indels were realigned with GATK IndelRealigner, and SNPs and indels were called separately using GATK UnifiedGenotyper version 3.3 [24], allowing for a ploidy of 2 and a minimum mapping quality of Phred 20. A ploidy of 2 for SNP detection is required to detect emerging resistant subpopulations. Low-quality positions were automatically rejected and assigned “N” for an unknown state. Each genomic position was assessed and filtered with a minimum depth (DP) of 10, mapping quality score (MQ) of 40, minimum quality per depth (QD) of 2, maximum Fisher’s exact test to detect strand bias (FS) of 200, and a minimum read positive rank sum value of −20. All positions failing these requirements were also designated unknown (N) when creating the consensus sequence and identifying resistance-associated mutations. Positions showing heterogeneity were also designated unknown (N) in the consensus sequence. Lumpy-SV version 0.2.9 [25] was used to screen for the presence of larger deletions in the sequenced genomes that could account for antibiotic resistance. Large deletions detected by Lumpy-SV must be confirmed by the absence of mapped reads over the deleted region to be valid. Reports generated by the Wadsworth Center TB WGS bioinformatics pipeline include species identification, spoligotype, and resistance-associated mutations for 10 drugs and drug classes (RIF, INH, PZA, EMB, SM, ETH, KAN, AMK, CPR and FLQ). The genes and non-coding regions studied were rpoB (rifampin), mabA-inhA promoter (isoniazid, ethionamide), katG (isoniazid), mabA (isoniazid, ethionamide) oxyR-ahpC (isoniazid) embB (ethambutol), gyrA and gyrB (fluoroquinolones), rrs (streptomycin, amikacin, kanamycin, capreomycin), rpsL (streptomycin) eis promoter (kanamycin) and pncA and pncA promoter (pyrazinamide). Any mutations present in 13 resistance-associated genes or noncoding regions were identified. However, only a select list of 64 “high-confidence” and selected “low-confidence” SNPs, insertions, and deletions across these 13 genes and noncoding regions were used to predict resistance as described previously [17]. The same negative control used for library preparation and sequencing was also used as a control for bioinformatic analysis. The control was considered passing if the DP of mapped reads to the H37Rv reference sequence was less than 5×. Samples exceeding a 40× genome-wide average DP, 20× DP for each SNP locus used to predict resistance, and reference genome coverage of at least 95% were considered acceptable and included in the analysis. Species identifications were made using Kraken version 0.10.5-beta [26] on the raw reads, utilizing a local database created from available fully sequenced and draft genomes of Mycobacterium species from NCBI. To improve runtime without affecting the accuracy of the SNP calling, samples exceeding 80× genome-wide average depth were downsampled using SAMtools to achieve an average depth of ~80× prior to the SNP calling step.
The resulting spoligotypes were compared to existing patterns in an international genotyping database SITVIT2, available at: http://www.pasteur-guadeloupe.fr:8081/SITVIT_ONLINE/, and assigned spoligotype international type (SIT) if they shared identical spoligotype patterns with patterns present in the existing database. Spoligotypes that had a match with a single database isolate, not yet assigned a number, were considered as orphans. The in-silico spoligotypes derived from WGS were confirmed using the Luminex MagPlex magnetic microspheres spoligotyping method as described previously [27].
HIV testing
Blood samples were collected for determining HIV status as per Tanzania National AIDS Control Programme Guidelines [28].
Data analysis
Data were analyzed with STATA version 12 software. Summarization of categorical variables utilized percentages while medians with interquartile range (IQR) was calculated for continuous variables. The main outcome was genetic drug resistance. Descriptive statistics were done to describe the distribution of the main outcome across relevant strata (age groups, sex and HIV status).
Ethical considerations
The study protocol and consent forms were reviewed and approved by the joint CUHAS/BMC ethics review committee and the Weill Cornell Medical College Institutional Review Board (IRB). Patients were identified and managed according to the Tanzania NTLP guidelines. Written informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from all enrolled participants.
RESULTS
A total of 78 newly diagnosed patients with pulmonary TB with a median age of 37 [IQR: 30 – 46] years were enrolled. Of these, 57.8% (45/74) were males and 34.6% (27/78) were HIV positive. Mycobacterium tuberculosis genomic DNA suitable for WGS analysis was obtained in isolates from 74 (94.9%) participants.
Drug Resistance Mutations
There were 6/74 (8.1%) patients harboring isolates resistant to at least one drug. The resistance to the drugs was isoniazid 3/74 (4.1%), rifampicin mono-resistant 2/74 (2.7%), ethambutol 2/74 (2.7%) and streptomycin 1/74 (1.4%). None was isoniazid mono-resistant. MDR-TB was detected in one (1.4%) of 74 patients. The resistance to ethionamide, the second line drug, was detected in one patient (1.4%). None was resistant to pyrazinamide, fluoroquinolones, kanamycin, amikacin or capreomycin. Table 1 summarizes the genotypic drug resistance of the 74 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates.
Table 1.
Distribution of genotypic drug resistance among 74 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates
Drug | Mutation | Number (n) |
Percent (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Any resistance | 6 | 8.1 | |
INH |
MabA-inhA C(-15)T katG Ser315Thr |
1 2 |
33.3 66.1 |
RIF |
rpoB His526Leu rpoB Ser531Leu |
1 2 |
33.3 66.7 |
EMB |
embB Met306Ile embB Met306Val |
1 1 |
50.0 50.0 |
SM | rpsL Lys43Arg | 1 | 100.0 |
PZA | Wild | 0 | 0.0 |
ETH | MabA-inhA C(-15)T | 1 | 100.0 |
KAN | Wild | 0 | 0.0 |
FLQ | Wild | 0 | 0.0 |
AMK | Wild | 0 | 0.0 |
CPR | Wild | 0 | 0.0 |
Mono-resistance | 3 | 4.1 | |
RIF | rpoB Ser531Leu | 2 | 66.7 |
SM | rpsL Lys43Arg | 1 | 33.3 |
Poly-resistance not MDR | 2 | 2.7 | |
INH + EMB | katG Ser315Thr + embB Met306Val | 1 | 50.0 |
INH + ETH | MabA-inhA C(-15)T | 1 | 50.0 |
MDR | 1 | 1.4 | |
INH + RIF + EMB | katG Ser315Thr + rpoB Ser531Leu + embB Met306Ile | 1 | 100 |
The mutations detected were mabA-inhA promoter region C(-15)T and katG S513T for isoniazid; rpoB His526Leu and rpoB Ser531Leu for rifampicin; embB Met306Val and embB Met306Ile for ethambutol; rpsL Lys43Arg for streptomycin; and mabA-inhA promoter region C(-15)T for ethionamide. One of the isolates with rpoB mutation at Ser531Leu had a compensatory rpoC mutation Glyc332Arg. This was the MDR-TB isolate. Table 2 summarizes the descriptions of patients, genotypic resistance, mutations for resistance and spoligotypes.
Table 2.
Patients’ characteristics, genotypic drug resistance, mutations and spoligotypes of the drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates
Sex | Age (years) |
HIV Status | Genotypic Resistance | Mutations | SIT | Clade | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female | 26 | Negative | INH + ETH | MabA-inhA C(-15)T | 26 | CAS1-DELHI | Cured |
Male | 52 | Positive | SM | rpsL Lys43Arg | 8 | EAI5 | Cured |
Male | 33 | Negative | RIF | rpoB His526Leu | 2487 | LAM11-ZWE | Defaulted |
Female | 19 | Negative | INH + RIF + EMB |
katG Ser315Thr; rpoB Ser531Leu; embB Met306Ile |
345 | T3-ETH | Died |
Female | 53 | Positive | INH + EMB |
katG Ser315Thr; embB Met306Val |
52 | T2 | Cured |
Female | 46 | Negative | RIF | rpoB Ser531Leu | Orphan | T1 | Transferred out |
Genetic Diversity of Drug Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
The six drug resistant isolates were from six distinct spoligotype lineage: T1 (Ill defined), T2 (Ill defined), T3-ETH (Ill defined), CAS1-DELHI (Central Asian Strain), EAI5 (East-African_Indian) and LAM11-ZWE (Latin-American-Mediterranean). Of note, the MDR-TB aroused from T3-ETH. The in-silico spoligotypes derived from WGS had a perfect match with those obtained from Luminex MagPlex magnetic microspheres spoligotyping method. Table 2 summarizes the descriptions of patients, genotypic resistance, genetic mutations for resistance and spoligotypes.
Patients Treatment Outcome
All patients were newly diagnosed and were treated according to the National standard regimen for treating new smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis which includes four anti-tuberculous drugs, namely isoniazid, rifampicin ethambutol and pyrazinamide for two months followed by isoniazid and rifampicin for four months. Of the 74 patients, 66 (89.2%) were cured, 6 (8.1%) died, one (1.4%) was transferred out and one (1.4%) defaulted. Table 2 summarizes the descriptions of patients and treatment outcome, genotypic resistance, mutations for resistance and spoligotypes.
DISCUSSION
WGS is a new tool in TB diagnostics and is capable of providing rapid drug resistance profiles while performing species identification and genotyping. Understanding the circulating Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance mutations is vital for better TB control strategies, especially to inform a new MDR-TB treatment programme. We found low prevalence of resistance to first and second line TB drugs as well as for the MDR. Likewise, no resistance to pyrazinamide fluoroquinolones and kanamycin was detected. Our result is similar to the previous studies, except for the prevalence of resistance to isoniazid, which is low compared to most of the previous studies [3 – 10, 29]. Isoniazid had high rate of resistance as it is commonly used as a prophylactic drug. This low prevalence of resistance to primary TB drugs as well as for the MDR could be attributed to the effort of the TB control programme in Tanzania as well as to the control for transmission of HIV infection. Our prevalence of MDR-TB is low despite the fact MDR-TB is an emerging problem in many parts of the world, and levels of MDR-TB among new TB patients are increasing in sub-Saharan Africa. A Systematic review by Kidenya et al., reports the prevalence of MDR-TB among new cases for the past 15 years in Tanzania ranges from 0.4 – 2.1% and within East Africa 0.4 – 4.4% [29].
We found common mutations conferring resistance to TB drugs as our findings are consistent with prior reports [29, 30]. The mutations detected were mabA-inhA promoter region C(-15)T and katG Ser513Thr for isoniazid. Over 90% of isoniazid resistant strains can be predicted using the high-confidence mutations on the katG, inhA(-15) and oxy-ahpC. The katG encodes for catalase-peroxidase and its mutation confers high level of isoniazid resistance. The mabA-inhA intergenic region encodes for enoyl-ACP reductase promoter and once mutated it causes low level of isoniazid resistance as well a resistance to ethionamide. The oxy-ahpC gene encodes for alky hydro-reductase and mutations thereof causes low level of resistance to isoniazid [31]. Of the three isoniazid resistant strains in our study, two had high level resistance with a katG mutation and one low level resistance with a mabA-inhA promoter region mutation. We found His526Leu and Ser531Leu rpoB mutations for rifampicin. Over 95% of rifampicin resistant strains can be predicted using the high-confidence mutations on the rpoB gene which encodes β subunit of the RNA polymerase [31, 32]. A review of all MDR-TB for the past 15 years in East Africa has shown that 88% had mutations in the short, 81 base pair core region of the rpoB gene [29]. We found the mutations on embB Met306Val and Met306Ile for ethambutol. About 70% of resistance to ethambutol can be predicted using the high-confidence mutations on the embB gene, particularly in codon 306. The embB gene is part of the embCAB operon which codes for arabinosyl transferases, involved in the biosynthesis of arabinogalactan and lipoarabinomannan, the key structural components of the mycobacterial cell wall [32]. The streptomycin resistant strain contained rpsL mutation Lys43Arg. Around 70% of strains resistant to streptomycin can be predicted using the high-confidence mutations on the rpsL and rrs genes coding for ribosomal protein S12 and 16S RNA respectively [32]. The MDR-TB patient with rpoB Ser531Leu mutation had also a compensatory rpoC Gly332Arg mutation suggesting that this strain was able to select for compensatory mutations that may enhance transmission [33].
In our study, 6 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with resistance to at least one drug were very diverse, each belonging to a different spoligotype-defined MTB lineage. All six spoligotypes were previously reported in East Africa [12, 34 – 42]. Five of them had an assigned SIT number and one was listed as an “orphan” with a single isolate from Serengeti, Northern part of Tanzania registered in SITVIT database [12]. Previous studies in East Africa have reported that there is no significant associations between MDR-TB and lineages [41 – 43]. The important finding that drug-resistant isolates were not related, underpins low possibility of local community spread of drug resistant tuberculosis.
Our study strength is the information emanating from the WGS sequencing as to the best of our knowledge this is the first study in our setting to detect the Mycobacterium tuberculosis spoligotypes and mutations conferring resistance. However our limitation is the small number of clinical isolates we have investigated.
Conclusion
The genetic drug resistance profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from North-western Tanzania comprises of the common previously reported mutations. The prevalence of first and second line drug resistant TB as well as MDR-TB is low. Drug resistant strains were of difference clades, suggesting limited transmission of drug resistant tuberculosis in the region. Further studies using WGS will allow monitoring the spread of existing drug-resistant strains and the appearance of new ones.
HIGHLIGHTS.
The genetic drug resistance profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Northwestern Tanzania comprises of the common previously reported mutations.
The prevalence of first and second line drug resistant TB as well as MDR-TB is low.
Drug resistant strains were of difference clades, suggesting limited transmission of drug resistant tuberculosis in the region.
Further studies using WGS will allow monitoring the spread of existing drug-resistant strains and the appearance of new ones.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the technical support provided by the members of Bugando Hospital Tuberculosis Laboratory. We are very thankful to colleagues from Wadsworth Scientific Cores - Patrick van Roey, Matthew Schudt and Pascale Lapierre - who performed sequencing and data processing for our samples.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS
Edited and reviewed critically the manuscript: BRK SEM OO DWF. Conceived and designed the experiment: BRK SEM OO DWF. Performed the experiment: BRK OO. Analyzed the data: BRK OO DWF Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BRK SEM OO DWF.
References
- 1.World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report. Geneva, Switzerland: 2016. http://wwwwhoint/tb/publications/global_report/en/ Accessed Jan 10 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Orenstein EW, Basu S, Shah NS, Andrews JR, Friedland GH, Moll AP, et al. Treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:153–161. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70041-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Range N, Friis H, Mfaume S, Magnussen P, Changalucha J, Kilale A, Mugomela A, Anderson AB. Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance pattern among pulmonary tuberculosis patients with or without HIV infection in Mwanza, Tanzania. Tanzania J Health Res. 2012;14(4) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Urassa W, Mugusi F, Villamor E, Msamanga G, Moshiro C, Bosch R, Saathoff E, Fawzi W. Primary antimicrobial resistance among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from HIV seropositive and HIV seronegative patients in Dar es Salaam Tanzania. BMC Res Notes. 2008;1:58. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-1-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kibiki G, Mulder B, Dolmans W, de Beer J, Boeree M, Sam N, van Soolingen D, Sola C, van der Zanden AM. Tuberculosis genotypic diversity and drug susceptibility pattern in HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected patients in northern Tanzania. BMC Microbiol. 2007;7:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Matee M, Mfinanga S, Holm-Hansen C. Anti-TB drug resistance levels and patterns among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from newly diagnosed cases of pulmonary tuberculosis in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. APMIS. 2009;117:263–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2008.02429.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chonde TM, Basra D, Mfinanga SG, Range N, Lwilla F, Shirima RP, van Deun A, Zignol M, Cobelens FG, Egwaga SM, van Leth F. National anti-tuberculosis drug resistance study in Tanzania. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14:967–972. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mfinanga SGM, Warren RM, Kazwala R, Kahwa A, Kazimoto T, Kimaro G, et al. Genetic Profile of M. Tuberculosis in relation to Drug Resistance and Treatment Outcomes in human pulmonary tuberculosis in Tanzania. Tanzania J Health Res. 2014;16(2):13. doi: 10.4314/thrb.v16i2.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nagu TJ, Aboud S, Mwiru R, Matee M, Fawzi W, Mugusi F. Multi Drug and Other Forms of Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Are Uncommon among Treatment Naïve Tuberculosis Patients in Tanzania. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0118601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118601. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hoza AS, Mfinanga SGM, König B. Anti-TB drug resistance in Tanga, Tanzania: A cross sectional facility-base prevalence among pulmonary TB patients. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2015 Nov;8(11):907–913. doi: 10.1016/j.apjtm.2015.10.014. Epub 2015 Oct 9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mpagama SG, Houpt ER, Stroup S, Kumburu H, Gratz J, Kibiki GS, Heysell SK. Application of quantitative second-line drug susceptibility testing at a multidrug-resistant tuberculosis hospital in Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Sep 14;13:432. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mbugi EV, Katale BZ, Siame KK, Keyyu JD, Kendall SL, Dockrell HM, et al. Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from tuberculosis patients in the Serengeti ecosystem in Tanzania. Tuberculosis. 2015;95(2):170–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2014.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.World Health Organization. 2015 Global Tuberculosis Report. WHO; Geneva: 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Köser CU, Ellington MJ, Cartwright EJ, Gillespie SH, Brown NM, Farrington M, et al. Routine use of microbial whole genome sequencing in diagnostic and public health microbiology. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(8):e1002824. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Boehme CC, Nabeta P, Hillemann D, Nicol MP, Shenai S, Krapp F, et al. Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(11):1005–1015. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Witney AA, Cosgrove CA, Arnold A, Hinds J, Stoker NJ, Butcher PD. Clinical use of whole genome sequencing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. BMC Med. 2016;14:46. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0598-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shea J, Halse TA, Lapierre P, Shudt M, Kohlerschmidt D, Van Roey P, Limberger R, Taylor J, Escuyer V, Musser KA. Comprehensive Whole-Genome Sequencing and Reporting of Drug Resistance Profiles on Clinical Cases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in New York State. J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jun;55(6):1871–1882. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00298-17. Epub 2017 Apr 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Walker TM, Ip CL, Harrell RH, Evans JT, Kapatai G, et al. Whole-genome sequencing to delineate Mycobacterium tuberculosis outbreaks: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(2):137–146. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70277-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kent P, Kubica G. US department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control; Atlanta, Ga: 1985. Public health mycobacteriology: A guide for the level III laboratory. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kidenya BR, Kabangila R, Peck RN, Mshana SE, Webster LE, Koenig SP, et al. Early and Efficient Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Sputum by Microscopic Observation of Broth Cultures. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e57527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057527. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.van Embden JD, Cave MD, Crawford JT, Dale JW, Eisenach KD, Gicquel B, Hermans P, Martin C, McAdam R, Shinnick TM, Small PM. Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA finger-printing: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:406–409. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.406-409.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li H. Improving SNP discovery by base alignment quality. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1157–1158. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr076. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, DePristo MA. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a Map-Reduce framework for analyzing next generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Layer RM, Chiang C, Quinlan AR, Hall IM. LUMPY: a probabilistic framework for structural variant discovery. Genome Biol. 2014;15:84. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-6-r84. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-6-r84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wood DE, Salzberg SL. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 2014;15:R46. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ocheretina O, Merveille YM, Mabou MM, Escuyer VE, Dunbar SA, Johnson WD, Pape JW, Fitzgerald DW. Use of Luminex MagPlex magnetic microspheres for high-throughput spoligotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jul;51(7):2232–7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00268-13. Epub 2013 May 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.United Republic of Tanzania, National Guideline for Management of HIV and AIDS. Available at: https://aidsfree.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/04_11_2016.tanzania_national_guideline_for_management_hiv_and_aids_may_2015._tagged.pdf Accessed 2015 March 10.
- 29.Kidenya BR, Webster LE, Behan S, Kabangila R, Peck RN, Mshana SE, Ocheretina O, Fitzgerald DW. Epidemiology and genetic diversity of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in East Africa. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2014 Jan;94(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Sep 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ssengooba W, Meehan CJ, Lukoye D, Kasule GW, Musisi K, Joloba ML, Cobelens FG, de Jong BC. Whole genome sequencing to complement tuberculosis drug resistance surveys in Uganda. Infect Genet Evol. 2016 Jun;40:8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.02.019. Epub 2016 Feb 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Taniguchi H. Molecular mechanisms of multidrug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. JUOEH. 2000 Sep 1;22(3):269–82. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.22.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Palomino JC, Martin A. Drug Resistance Mechanisms in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antibiotics (Basel) 2014 Jul 2;3(3):317–40. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics3030317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.de Vos M, Muller B, Borrell S, Black PA, van Helden PD, Warren RM, Gagneux S, Victor TC. Putative compensatory mutations in the rpoC gene of rifampinresistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis are associated with ongoing transmission. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:827–832. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01541-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Eldholm V, Matee M, Mfinanga SGM, Heun M, Dahle UR. A first insight into the genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, assessed by spoligotyping. BMC Microbiology. 2006;6:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kibiki G, Mulder B, Dolmans W, de Beer J, Boeree M, Sam NM, et al. Tuberculosis genotypic diversity and drug susceptibility pattern in HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected patients in northern Tanzania. BMC microbiology. 2007;7(1):51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hoza AS, Mfinanga SG, Moser I, König B. Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Tanga, Tanzania: First insight of MIRU-VNTR and microarray-based spoligotyping in a high burden country. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2016 May;98:116–24. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Mar 29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mfinanga SGM, Warren RM, Kazwala R, Kahwa A, Kazimoto T, Kimaro G, et al. Genetic Profile of M. Tuberculosis in relation to Drug Resistance and Treatment Outcomes in human pulmonary tuberculosis in Tanzania. Tanzania J Health Res. 2014;16(2):13. doi: 10.4314/thrb.v16i2.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mbugi EV, Katale BZ, Streicher EM, Keyyu JD, Kendall SL, Dockrell HM, et al. Mapping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Genetic Diversity Profiles in Tanzania and Other African Countries. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0154571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bazira J, Asiimwe BB, Joloba ML, Bwanga F, Matee MI. Mycobacterium tuberculosis spoligotypes and drug susceptibility pattern of isolates from tuberculosis patients in South-Western Uganda. BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Mar 31;11:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gafirita J, Umubyeyi AN, Asiimwe BB. A first insight into the genotypic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Rwanda. BMC Clin Pathol. 2012 Nov 6;12:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6890-12-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Asiimwe BB, Ghebremichael S, Kallenius G, Koivula T, Joloba ML. Mycobacterium tuberculosis spoligotypes and drug susceptibility pattern of isolates from tuberculosis patients in peri-urban Kampala, Uganda. BMC Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 28;8:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lukoye D, Katabazi FA, Musisi K, Kateete DP, Asiimwe BB, Okee M, Joloba ML, Cobelens FG. The T2 Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotype, predominant in Kampala, Uganda, shows negative correlation with antituberculosis drug resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Jul;58(7):3853–9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02338-13. Epub 2014 Apr 28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Glynn JR, Alghamdi S, Mallard K, McNerney R, Ndlovu R, Munthali L, Houben RM, Fine PE, French N, Crampin AC. Changes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotype families over 20 years in a population-based study in Northern Malawi. PLoS One. 2010 Aug 17;5(8):e12259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]