We developed easy to synthesize and efficient strigolactone analogs with great application potential. Biological activities and receptor binding assays demonstrate the effect of structural modification on the efficacy and specificity of strigolactones.
Keywords: Carlactone, methyl carlactonoic acid, plant architecture, root parasitic weeds, Striga hermonthica, strigolactones, tillering
abstract
Strigolactones (SLs) are a new class of phytohormones that also act as germination stimulants for root parasitic plants, such as Striga spp., and as branching factors for symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Sources for natural SLs are very limited. Hence, efficient and simple SL analogs are needed for elucidating SL-related biological processes as well as for agricultural applications. Based on the structure of the non-canonical SL methyl carlactonoate, we developed a new, easy to synthesize series of analogs, termed methyl phenlactonoates (MPs), evaluated their efficacy in exerting different SL functions, and determined their affinity for SL receptors from rice and Striga hermonthica. Most of the MPs showed considerable activity in regulating plant architecture, triggering leaf senescence, and inducing parasitic seed germination. Moreover, some MPs outperformed GR24, a widely used SL analog with a complex structure, in exerting particular SL functions, such as modulating Arabidopsis roots architecture and inhibiting rice tillering. Thus, MPs will help in elucidating the functions of SLs and are promising candidates for agricultural applications. Moreover, MPs demonstrate that slight structural modifications clearly impact the efficiency in exerting particular SL functions, indicating that structural diversity of natural SLs may mirror a functional specificity.
Introduction
Strigolactones (SLs) are secondary metabolites originally identified as root-derived chemical signals inducing seed germination in root parasitic plants of the family Orobanchaceae (Xie et al., 2010). Later, SLs were also shown to induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, which is required for establishing beneficial AM symbiosis (Akiyama et al., 2005). In the meantime, SLs were recognized as a novel class of plant hormones that determine different developmental processes, such as establishing shoot and root architecture, regulating secondary growth and inducing senescence (Gomez-Roldan et al., 2008; Umehara et al., 2008; Ruyter-Spira et al., 2013; Beveridge, 2014). In addition, SLs are involved in pathogen defense and act as positive regulators of abiotic stress responses (Ha et al., 2014; Torres-Vera et al., 2014; Decker et al., 2017).
Natural SLs are carotenoid derivatives consisting of a lactone ring (D-ring) that is connected by an enol ether bridge (in R-configuration) to a structurally variable second moiety (Al-Babili and Bouwmeester, 2015). Canonical SLs, such as strigol and orobanchol, contain a tricyclic lactone (ABC-ring) as a second moiety and are divided, depending on stereochemistry of the B/C-junction, into strigol-like (β-orientation, up) and orobanchol-like (α-orientation, down) SLs (Ueno et al., 2011; Xie et al., 2013). Besides the stereochemistry of the B/C-junction, various modifications of the ABC-ring, such as hydroxylation at different positions, lead to the diversity of canonical SLs. Non-canonical SLs, such as methyl carlactonoate (Abe et al., 2014), heliolactone (Ueno et al., 2014) and zealactone (Charnikhova et al., 2017; Xie et al., 2017), do not have an ABC-lactone as a second moiety. The question of whether and how structural diversity leads to functional specificity of the around 25 known natural SLs is largely elusive (Xie, 2016).
The availability of SL biosynthesis and perception mutants has enabled the elucidation of key steps in SL biosynthesis and perception (Al-Babili and Bouwmeester, 2015; Lumba et al., 2017; Waters et al., 2017). SL biosynthesis starts in plastids with the reversible cis/trans-isomerization of the precursor all-trans-β-carotene into 9-cis-β-carotene (Alder et al., 2012; Bruno and Al-Babili, 2016). In the next step, the stereospecific carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 7 (CCD7) cleaves 9-cis-β-carotene into the intermediate 9-cis-β-apo-10′-carotenal and β-ionone (Alder et al., 2012; Bruno et al., 2014). Another CCD, CCD8, converts 9-cis-β-apo-10′-carotenal via a combination of repeated dioxygenation and intra-molecular rearrangements into carlactone (Alder et al., 2012; Bruno et al., 2017). Carlactone is a central metabolite of SL biosynthesis (Alder et al., 2012; Seto et al., 2014) and is the substrate for cytochrome P450 enzymes of the clade 711, MAX1, in Arabidopsis (Booker et al., 2005), which catalyse the formation of canonical SLs, such as 4-deoxyorobanchol, and non-canonical SLs, such as carlactonoic acid (Abe et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014). In Arabidopsis carlactonoic acid is methylated by an unidentified methyltransferase into methyl carlactonoate (Abe et al., 2014). In the next step, methyl carlactonoate is hydroxylated by LATERAL BRANCHING OXIDOREDUCTASE (LBO) into an unidentified product that may be the final product in Arabidopsis SL biosynthesis (Brewer et al., 2016). The rice MAX1, homolog carlactone oxidase, catalyses the conversion of carlactone into 4-deoxyorobanchol (ent-2′-epi-5-deoxystrigol), the precursor of canonical, orobanchol-like SLs. Orobanchol itself is produced by another rice MAX1 homolog, the orobanchol synthase (Zhang et al., 2014; Al-Babili and Bouwmeester, 2015).
Strigolactone perception and downstream signaling involve the α/β-fold hydrolase DWARF14 (D14) (Hamiaux et al., 2012; de Saint Germain et al., 2016; Yao et al., 2016), which acts as a non-canonical receptor that covalently binds the D-ring of SLs during their hydrolysis. In addition, SL signaling requires the leucine-rich-repeat F-box protein MORE AXILLARY GROWTH 2 (MAX2)/DWARF3 (D3) (Stirnberg et al., 2007), a subunit of a SKP1-CUL1-F-box-protein (SCF)-type ubiquitin ligase complex, which targets repressors of SL signaling, such as Arabidopsis SUPPRESSOR OF MORE AXILLARY GROWTH2 1-LIKE 6,7,8 (SMXL6,7,8) or rice DWARF53 (D53), for proteasome-mediated degradation (Jiang et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2013; Soundappan et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015; Liang et al., 2016). The F-box protein MAX2 is also required for signal transduction of karrikins, smoke-derived compounds that likely mimic an unidentified internal signaling molecule(s) and that inhibit hypocotyl growth and induce seed germination in various plant species but not in root parasitic weeds (Nelson et al., 2012). Karrikins share structural similarities (D-ring) with SLs and bind to the D14 paralog KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE 2 (KAI2), likely leading to proteasomal degradation of presumed suppressors (Waters et al., 2017). Karrikin response is also triggered by the 2′S-configured stereoisomer of the common SL analog GR24 that is usually applied as a racemic mixture of 2′S and 2′R isomers (Scaffidi et al., 2014). The genome of the root parasitic plant Striga hermonthica encodes 11 D14/KAI2 homologs. It was recently shown that Striga KAI2 paralogs, especially ShHTL7, which constitute a distinct clade, are responsible for perception of host-released SLs and thus for triggering parasitic weed seed germination (Conn et al., 2015; Tsuchiya et al., 2015; Yao et al., 2017).
Several parasitic Striga and Phelipanche species of the family Orobanchaceae are of great importance for agriculture. The Striga species S. asiatica and S. hermonthica infect cereals, including maize, sorghum, pearl millet, and rice, while Phelipanche species affect crops such as sunflower, tomato and legumes (Parker, 2009). S. hermonthica is considered as one of the seven most severe biotic threats to food security, affecting subsistence and livelihood of 100 million people in sub-Saharan Africa (Pennisi, 2010). S. hermonthica has been observed in 32 countries (Rodenburg et al., 2017) infesting an estimated 50 million hectares of arable land in the Sahel and savanna zones in Africa, causing annual losses of around 7 billion US$ (Ejeta, 2007; Parker, 2009, 2012). Related broom rape species, such as Orobanche crenata and Phelipanche ramosa, parasitize several non-cereal crops causing severe yield losses in the Mediterranean, central and eastern Europe, and Asia (Parker, 2009). Heavy soil infestation with enormous numbers of long-lived, tiny seeds, and germination dependency of these seeds on host-derived signaling molecules has made control of these parasitic weeds very difficult (Joel, 2000; Ejeta, 2007; Delavault et al., 2017).
During the evolution of parasitism, root parasitic plants have either totally lost or significantly reduced their capability for photosynthesis and, hence, cannot survive without a host plant that provides them with metabolites, water and minerals (Xie et al., 2010). In this parasite–host relationship, SLs are chemical signals required for the germination of parasite seeds, ensuring availability of an appropriate host (Ruyter-Spira et al., 2013). Such dependency on germination cues may provide opportunities for parasitic weed control. Induction of parasitic weed seed germination by exogenous application of germination stimuli before sowing crop seeds could, for instance, lead to the death of emerging parasite seedling (suicidal germination). This could be a promising approach to reduce the weed seed bank in soil. For this purpose, natural SLs are, however, not suitable candidates since they cannot be obtained from natural sources in sufficient quantities or at reasonable costs (Zwanenburg et al., 2016b). Moreover, organic synthesis of natural SLs is challenging, due to their complex structures that contain several chiral centers (Kgosi et al., 2012; Zwanenburg and Pospísil, 2013; Zwanenburg et al., 2016a). Hence, a prerequisite for implementing the suicidal germination approach outlined above is the availability of SLs or analogs/mimics that are easy to synthesize and that efficiently induce Striga seed germination (Oancea et al., 2017; Dvorakova et al., 2017). SL analogs could also be used in agriculture and horticulture, for instance, to direct water and other resources in one major branch by suppressing branching or tillering, to induce secondary growth, to enhance abiotic stress tolerance or to modulate root architecture (Li et al., 2016), by increasing primary root length (Agusti et al., 2011; Ha et al., 2014). SLs also accelerate senescence (Yamada et al., 2014), a functionality that might be exploited for the development of a new suite of herbicides.
Recently, we have reported on a carlactone-based SL analog, nitro-phenlactone, which has SL activity, but with different efficiency, indicating the possibility of establishing SLs analogs with specific functions (Jia et al., 2016). In the present work, we developed a new series of SLs analogs, methyl phenlactonoates (MPs), which can be easily synthesized and which resemble the non-canonical SL methyl carlactonoate. Aiming at the identification of analogs that can be applied as suicidal germination agents and growth regulators or used in basic research to determine particular SL activities, we measured the stability of MPs, explored their activities in exerting different SL functions and investigated their affinity for SL receptors.
Materials and methods
Chemical synthesis of methyl phenlactonoates
All compounds (Fig. 1) synthesized here were produced and applied as a racemic mixture of two stereoisomers that differ in the configuration of the C2′ atom (2′R and 2′S configurations). For the synthesis of (E)-methyl 3-(4-methyl-5-oxo-2,5-dihydrofuran-2-yloxy)-2-phenylacrylate (MP3), we used a previously described protocol (Mangnus et al., 1992a). Sodium hydride (372 mg, 3.32 mmol) was added to a cooled (0 °C) and stirred solution of methyl phenylacetate (2.0 g, 13.3 mmol) and methyl formate (1.1 ml, 18.0 mmol) in dry tetrahydrofuran (THF; 27 ml) in a 100 ml Erlenmeyer flask. After 10 min, the reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight under elevated ambient nitrogen. Then the reaction mixture was cooled again with an ice bath, and 5-bromo-3-methyl-2(5H)-furanone (2.4 g, 13.3 mmol) in THF (5 ml) was gradually added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction mixture was poured into ethyl acetate (70 ml), and organic layer was washed successively with water (80 ml) and saturated sodium chloride solution (80 ml), dried with sodium sulfate, and concentrated in vacuo. Oily residue was purified with silica gel (Wakosil® C-300HG) column with hexane and ethyl acetate as eluent to give title compound MP3 (Fig. 2A). Physico-chemical properties of MP3 are shown in Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online. The compounds MP2, MP4-11, MP14 and MP15 were synthesized following the same procedure by using accordingly substituted methyl phenylacetates as starting materials.
(E)-Methyl 3-(4-methyl-5-oxo-2,5-dihydrofuran-2-yloxy)-2-(4-nitrophenyl) acrylate (MP1) was prepared by nitration of MP3 (Fig. 2B). In a 10 ml round-bottom flask, 0.4 ml of concentrated sulfuric acid was added drop-wise to 1 mmol of MP3, and cooled with an ice bath. After complete addition of sulfuric acid, approximately 0.2 ml of concentrated nitric acid was added drop-wise with cooling by a small graduated plastic pipette and mixed by gentle swirling. The reaction mixture was then allowed to stand at room temperature for about 15 min and poured into 10 ml of ice water with stirring. Organic chemicals were then extracted three times with ethyl acetate. After evaporation in vacuo, the residue was purified using a silica gel column with ethyl acetate–hexane as eluents to give nitrated compounds (65% yield). These nitrated compounds, 2-nitro (MP2) and 4-nitro (MP1), were separated by a reverse-phase column (ODS) with 1:1 MeOH:water. Physico-chemical properties of MP1 are shown in Supplementary Table S1.
(E)-3-(4-Methyl-5-oxo-2,5-dihydrofuran-2-yloxy)-2-(4-nitrophenyl) acrylaldehyde (MP12) was synthesized as follows. To a stirred solution of 4-nitrophenyl acetic acid (1.8 g) in dimethylformamide (5 ml), POCl3 (2.9 ml, 30 mmol) was added slowly (over 15 min) so that the reaction temperature was kept below 70 °C. Then the reaction mixture was stirred at 70 °C for another 12 h. The mixture was poured into 10 g of ice and neutralized by K2CO3 solution (200 ml). The resultant solid was isolated by filtration and dried to give (Z)-3-(dimethylamino)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)acrylaldehyde, which was used in the next reaction without further purification. (Z)-3-(Dimethylamino)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)acrylaldehyde (150 mg, 0.68 mmol) and 7.7 M NaOH aq 97 μl (1.1 eq, 0.75 mmol) was heated at 70 °C until the reaction mixture became homogeneous. Then the reaction mixture was dried by evaporation under reduced pressure. To the solution of resultant residue in DMSO (1.5 ml), 5-bromo-3-methyl-2(5H)-furanone (120 mg, 0.68 mmol) was added slowly and stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with diethylether and the organic layer was washed successively with water and saturated sodium chloride solution, dried (Na2SO4) and evaporated (Fig. 2C). The residue was column chromatographed on silica gel using a mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate as eluent to give MP12. Physico-chemical properties of MP12 are shown in Supplementary Table S1.
Chemical stability
Aqueous solutions of MPs (50 μg ml−1; pH 6.8) were incubated at 21 °C in amber HPLC vials (adapted from de Saint Germain et al., 2016). For sample preparation, 50 μl of an acetone solution (1 mg ml−1) was diluted to the final concentration with methanol (425 μl), water (500 μl) and 25 μl of 1-indanol (1.0 mg ml−1 solution in acetone) as internal standard. The time course of degradation was monitored by UHPLC analysis on a Dionex Ultimate 3000, using a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 column (3.5 μm, 2.1 × 150 mm). The column was developed at a flow rate of 0.6 ml min–1 at 35 °C with a linear gradient from 5% to 95% acetonitrile in water within 15 min, maintaining the final conditions for another 4 min. The column was operated at 35 °C with a flow rate of 0.25 ml min−1. Compounds eluted from the column were detected with a diode array detector. The relative quantity of remaining (non-degraded) product was determined by comparison with the internal standard. Stability was monitored at 24 h intervals up to 3 weeks.
Parasitic weed seed germination bioassays
Parasitic weed seeds’ (S. hermonthica and P. ramosa) germination activity was studied as described previously (Jamil et al., 2012). Six pre-conditioned seed discs were placed in a 90 mm Petri dish containing a filter paper ring wetted with 0.9 ml sterile MilliQ water. Then 50 μl of SL analog solution (10–5–10–12 M) was applied on each of the six discs, for each concentration. GR24 solutions with equal concentrations and sterile MilliQ water were included as a positive and negative control, respectively. After application, seeds of S. hermonthica and P. ramosa were incubated in dark at 30 °C for 2 d and at 25 °C for 4 d, respectively. Germination (seeds with radicle emerging through the seed coat) was scored under a binocular microscope, and germination rate (%) was calculated.
Rice micro tillering bioassays
Rice seeds (WT, d3, d10) were surface-sterilized by washing with 70% ethanol for 1 min and then with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite for 15 min. Seeds were then rinsed thoroughly with sterile MilliQ water and incubated in water for 2 d at 30 °C in the dark. Pre-germinated seeds were transferred to filter papers containing half-strength MS medium in 90 mm Petri dishes and incubated at 30 °C under fluorescent white light (130–180 μmol m−2 s−1) for 1 week. Seven-day-old seedlings were transferred to 50 ml falcon tubes (one seedling per tube) containing modified half-strength Hoagland nutrient solution and grown in greenhouse. Plants were treated with MPs at 2.5 μM to 2.5 × 10–7 μM, using GR24 as positive control. The compounds were applied six times, twice a week. Number of tillers per plant, plant height and fresh biomass were measured at final harvest.
Measurement of dark-induced leaf senescence
One-week-old rice (O. sativa, var. Shiokari) seedlings were established as mentioned above. Uniform seedlings were transferred to 50 ml tubes containing half-strength Hoagland nutrient solution for 7 d and grown in an incubator under white fluorescent light (130–180 μmol m−2 s−1) with 16 h/8 h (L/D) at 28 °C for 1 week. Leaf segments of 2 cm were cut from middle part of third leaves of rice plants. Each segment was put in a well (in 24-well plates) containing 2 ml of 2.5 mM MES buffer with 0.05% Tween-20, and incubated at 30 °C in the dark for 7 d. After application of MPs, color change, chlorophyll content, ion leakage, and gene expression were monitored daily for 7 d.
Arabidopsis hypocotyl elongation assays
Sterilized Arabidopsis seeds were sown on half-strength MS (with 0.5% sucrose+1% agar, 0.5 g l−1 MES, pH 5.7) plates supplemented with MPs or GR24 (at 1.0 μM). Plates were stored at 4 °C in darkness for 3 d. To initiate germination, plates were exposed to continuous white light for 24 h, then transferred to continuous monochromatic red light (20 μmol m−2 s−1, 22 °C) conditions for another 4 d. For hypocotyl length measurement, at least 30 seedlings were measured using the freely available ImageJ software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) after taking digital photographs. A monochromatic red light source was applied as described previously (Wu and Yang, 2010). Light flow rates were measured using a Li250 quantum photometer (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA).
Measurement of Arabidopsis lateral root density and primary root length
Sterilized Arabidopsis seeds were sown on half-strength MS (with 0.5% sucrose+1% agar, 0.5 g l−1 MES, pH 5.7) plates supplemented with GR24 or MPs (at 1.0 μM). Plates were stored at 4 °C in darkness for 3 d and then vertically grown at 22 °C in a Percival incubator under long day condition (16 h at 22 °C/8 h at 16 °C day/night, 60% relative humidity, 60–70 μmol m−2 s−1 white light) for 8 d. For determining the effect on lateral root density and primary root length, at least 30 seedlings were measured using ImageJ software after scanning roots.
Protein expression and purification
Striga hermonthica ShHTL7 cDNA was used, GenBank accession KR013127, kindly provided by Tsuyoshi Ota, The University of Tokyo, Japan. Arabidopsis D14 (AtD14) cDNA, GenBank accession AY097402, was synthesized and cloned into pUC57 (GenScript). ShHTL7 and OsD14 cDNAs were amplified by RT-PCR using the primers shown in Supplementary Table S2, digested with BamHI and XhoI, and ligated into BamHI/XhoI-digested pGEX-6P-1 expression vector (GE Healthcare). Integrity of plasmids was confirmed by sequencing (KAUST Bioscience Core Lab). The plasmids were then transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells. The cells were grown in LB broth containing ampicillin (100 mg ml−1), incubated at 37 °C until OD600 of 0.6 and induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside at 16 °C for 16 h. Harvested cells were resuspended in lysis buffer: 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 200 mM NaCl, 0.5% Tween-20 and 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). After sonication on ice for 10 min, the lysate was centrifuged at 75 000 g for 30 min at 4 °C. Supernatant was allowed to bind to glutathione–sepharose beads (GE Healthcare) for 2 h at 4 °C, washed 3 times with buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 200 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT), and eluted by cleaving the GST moiety with PreScission™ Protease (GE Healthcare) at 4 °C overnight. Eluted protein was further purified by gel filtration using a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex200 prep grade column (GE Healthcare) on an AKTA prime system (GE Healthcare) in gel filtration buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl and 2 mM DTT). Protein eluted as a sharp single peak and purity was judged by 4–15% SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad). Purified protein was concentrated using an Amicon 10K filter unit (Merck Millipore) and stored at −80 °C until use. A similar expression and purification protocol was followed for OsD14 protein, except that OsD14 was eluted from glutathione resins using 0.2 mM reduced glutathione (Sigma-Aldrich) without cutting the GST tag.
Intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence assays
ShHTL7/D14 tryptophans were excited at 280 nm and emission intensity was measured at 333 nm. ShHTL7/D14 (10 μM) was incubated at various dilutions (0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 3.12, 6.25, 12.5, 25, and 50 μM) of GR24 and MPs for 30 min at room temperature before measurement. Each concentration point was measured in triplicate. Emitted fluorescence was monitored using a spectraMaxi3 plate reader (Molecular Devices) in 96-well black plates. Changes in tryptophan fluorescence intensity occur due to conformational changes in protein when it is bound to ligand; differences in fluorescence intensity were recorded and analysed. Data were normalized and dissociation coefficient (Kd) values were calculated by fitting to a binding saturation single-site model with Prism 6 (GraphPad).
In vitro hydrolysis assays
The hydrolysis of GR24 and MPs by ShHTL7/OsD14 was performed in a total volume of 0.5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline containing 10 µM of substrate. Purified ShHTL7/OsD14 was added at a concentration of 50 µg ml−1 and incubated for the indicated time at 37 °C. After adding 1-indanol (10 µl of a 2.5 mg ml−1 solution in methanol), as internal standard, solutions were filtered and transferred to HPLC vials. Hydrolysis of substrates was monitored by HPLC analysis using a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 column (3.5 µm, 2.1 × 150 mm), eluted by a gradient from 10% to 90% acetonitrile in water within 15 min, keeping the final condition for 4 min. The column was operated at 30 °C with a flow rate of 0.2 ml min−1. Eluted compounds were detected using a diode array detector. Amounts of remaining substrates were determined by calculating corresponding peaks, in comparison with an internal standard.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were carried out using the statistical software package R (version 3.2.2). Dose–response curves and half-maximum effective concentrations (EC50) were calculated to determine optimum amount of MPs. The synthetic strigolactone analog GR24 was used as reference to estimate efficacy of selected compounds. EC50 and estimated response were calculated using the drc package (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/drc/) with a four parameter logistic curve (dose–response curve) (Ritz and Streibig, 2005).
Results
Synthesis and chemical stability of MPs
We synthesized 14 methyl phenlactonoates (MPs) as described above in ‘Material and methods’ (structures are shown in Fig. 1 and synthesis steps in Fig. 2) and determined their stability, which is a decisive factor for their activity and application. Stability measurements were performed in comparison with GR24, using aqueous solution (pH 6.8) of the different compounds. MP2, MP3, MP4, MP5, MP7, and MP10 were more stable than GR24, with MP5 being the most stable compound (see Supplementary Fig. S1). MP12, which carries an aldehyde instead of carboxy methyl group, was quite unstable and not detectable even after only 24 h. MP1 and MP15 were slightly less stable than GR24, while the stability of MP6, MP8, MP9, MP11, and MP14 was very similar to that of GR24. Varying substitutions on different sites in the A-ring (phenol ring) in SLs could lead to variations in MP stability that finally might define the effectiveness of MPs as SLs.
MPs are potent inducers of seed germination in root parasitic weeds
We determined the activity of MPs in inducing seed germination of the root parasitic weeds S. hermonthica and P. ramosa. In the first assay, we applied MPs at a 1.0 μM concentration. All compounds showed considerable activity in the S. hermonthica germination assay (see Supplementary Fig. S2) with rates ranging from 32% (MP11) to 75% (MP1). Differences between MPs were more pronounced in the P. ramosa germination assay where we observed much higher activity with MP1, MP2, and MP8, compared with other MPs (Supplementary Fig. S2). Next, we established half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) for S. hermonthica seed germination, using concentrations ranging from 10–5 to 10–12 M. Among MPs, we observed the highest activity with MP1, which exhibited an EC50 value of 1.5 × 10–9 M. Other MPs were at least ~5-fold weaker, showing EC50 values ranging from 3.2 × 10–8 (MP2) to 1.7 × 10–6 M (MP11). The EC50 of the lead compound, MP3, was 8.7 × 10–8 M. GR24 was the most active analog, exhibiting an EC50 value of 9.1 × 10–11 M (Fig. 3).
MPs rescue the tillering phenotype in rice d10 mutant
Next, we tested whether MPs restore wild type tillering in the rice d10 mutant. For this purpose, we grew the plants in hydroponic culture and applied the compounds at a 2.5 μM concentration. As shown in Fig. 4, all MPs rescued the high tillering phenotype of the d10 mutant, similar to GR24. The recorded number of tillers of d10 was four tillers per plant on average in untreated (Mock) plants; this was reduced to one tiller per plant in all MP- and GR24-treated samples (Fig. 4A). In contrast, neither MPs nor GR24 could restore the high-tillering phenotype of the SL-insensitive d3 mutant that maintained an average of four tillers per plant (overall average of all tested compounds) in treated and untreated samples (Fig. 4A, B). This result suggests that MPs act through the SL signaling pathway that requires the D3 protein. We determined the EC50 values of MP1, MP3, and MP7 for reducing the high-tillering phenotype of the d10 mutant, using concentrations ranging from 2.5 × 10–6 to 2.5 × 10–12 M and in comparison to GR24. MP3 showed the lowest EC50 value (2.98 × 10–9 M), followed by MP7 (2.54 × 10–8 M), GR24 (4.83 × 10–2 M) and MP1 (2.42 × 10–1 M) (Fig. 4C). This result suggests that MP3 and MP7 are more active than GR24 in inhibiting rice tillering, with MP3 being the most active compound (Fig. 4C and Supplementary Fig. S4). Besides reducing the number of tillers, we observed that treatment with MP2, MP3, MP6, MP9, and MP10 at 2.5 μM, concentration stunted the growth and caused senescence symptoms of rice seedlings, leading to an obvious decrease in biomass (Supplementary Fig. S3). We assumed that this effect is caused by the high activity of these compounds in inducing senescence.
MP3 accelerates dark-induced leaf senescence
We also investigated the effect of MP3 on dark-induced leaf senescence, in comparison with GR24. We observed a change in color in GR24- and MP3-treated leaf segments already on the third day after treatment and about 2 d earlier than the control (Fig. 5A). Consistently, measurement of the chlorophyll content showed a clear reduction in GR24- and MP3-treated segments on the third day, which further increased in the following days (Fig. 5B). We also measured the ion leakage that is usually caused by senescence. As shown in Fig. 5C, we did not detect a difference between GR24- or MP3-treated segments and the control in the first 5 d. However, on the sixth and seventh day, both GR24- and MP3-treated leaf segments showed a striking increase, compared with the control. Finally, we determined the transcript levels of the senescence-associated genes (SAGs) Osl20 (coding for branched chain α-keto dehydrogenase) and Osl295 (coding for aspartic protease) (Lee et al. 2001). After 5 d of treatment, both genes showed a striking increase in their transcripts, which was more pronounced in MP3-treated samples (Fig. 5D, E).
Effect of MPs on seedlings development in Arabidopsis
We also tested the effect of MPs on hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis seedlings. Apart from MP12 and MP15, all MPs showed significant inhibition of hypocotyl growth, particularly MP7, which displayed a stronger inhibitory effect than GR24 that was applied at the same concentration (1.0 μM; Supplementary Fig. S5). We also investigated the effect on lateral root density. Here again, all compounds reduced the number of lateral roots with different efficiencies. MP1 was the most efficient compound and showed an activity higher than that of GR24, followed by MP7 and MP8, which were slightly more active than GR24 (Fig. 6A). We also tested the activity of MPs in increasing primary root length (Fig. 6B). In this experiment, we evaluated the lead molecule MP3 and three compounds, MP1, MP7 and MP8, that showed the highest activity in decreasing lateral root densities. MP1 was the most active compound, followed by MP7 and the positive control, GR24. MP3 showed a weaker activity than GR24 and MP8. The latter two caused a similar increase in primary root length (Fig. 6C).
MP1 is the preferred substrate for ShHTL7 and OsD14
To better understand the differences in inducing germination of S. hermonthica seeds, we determined the affinity of ShHTL7 for MP1, MP3, and MP7 by measuring its intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence upon binding to different concentrations of these compounds and in comparison with GR24. ShHTL7 exhibited the highest affinity towards GR24 with a Kd value of 0.44 ± 0.21 µM (Fig. 7A). We observed a slightly weaker affinity for MP1 (0.72 ± 0.55 µM), followed by MP7 (1.15 ± 0.31 µM), and the lowest affinity for MP3 (10.1 ± 5.1 µM) (Fig. 7A). To test affinity of MPs towards OsD14, we also measured intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence upon binding to different concentrations of selected MPs (1, 3 and 7) in comparison with GR24. As depicted in Fig. 7B, OsD14 showed the highest affinity towards MP1 (3.5 ± 0.35 µM), followed by GR24 (4.17 ± 0.32 µM), MP3 (7.46 ± 0.53 µM), and finally MP7 (8.74 ± 0.83 µM). We investigated the hydrolysis rates of three MPs by SHTL7, in comparison with GR24. For this purpose, we incubated purified SHTL7 with the compounds and monitored hydrolysis by HPLC after defined time intervals. As shown in Fig. 8A, we observed the highest hydrolysis rates with MP1, followed by MP7, GR24, and finally MP3. We also tested hydrolysis of three MPs by purified OsD14. Here again, we observed the same tendency, by detecting the highest hydrolysis rate with MP1, followed by MP7, GR24, and finally MP3 (Fig. 8B).
Discussion
SLs regulate different aspects of plant development and responses to environmental changes. Moreover, they play a key role in the life cycle of root parasitic weeds and in establishing the plant beneficial mycorrhizal symbiosis. Therefore, SLs have a great potential for application in agriculture, horticulture, and forestry (Screpanti et al., 2016). Sources of natural SLs are quite limited, since plants usually produce these compounds at very low concentrations (exudates of 300 000 sorghum plants were required to isolate only 5 μg of sorgolactone; Humphrey et al., 2006). Moreover, organic synthesis of natural SLs is challenging, due to their complex structures that also contains several chiral centers (Zwanenburg et al., 2013). Therefore, there is a need for low-cost and efficient SL analogs/mimics. Developing SL analogs with specificity for particular function(s) would also take an important step in translating SL research into potential applications.
We were particularly interested in developing SL analogs that can be applied as a suicidal seed germination agent to combat the root parasites S. hermonthica and P. ramosa. The suicidal germination approach would address a major constraint in the control of root parasitic weeds, which is the generally observed large size of seed bank of parasite-infested soil. Seasonal applications of germination stimulants in the absence of a host would gradually deplete this seed bank. This strategy has been recently tested in P. ramosa- and S. hermonthica-infested tobacco and sorghum fields, respectively (Samejima et al., 2016; Zwanenburg et al., 2016a). Results obtained from these field trials are promising and demonstrate the feasibility of the suicidal germination approach and consequently the importance of developing optimized SL analogs.
Most of our knowledge about SL functions was deduced from experiments performed with the widely used SL analog GR24. However, the synthesis of this compound is laborious and requires six to eight steps (Mangnus et al., 1992b). Similarly, the synthesis of the potent fluorescent analog CISA-1 requires eight steps (Rasmussen et al., 2013). Other compounds, such as AR36 (Boyer et al., 2014) and 4-Br-debranone (4BD) (Fukui et al., 2013), which contain a D-ring connected by an enol ether bridge to less complex second moieties, showed moderate activity in inducing parasite seed germination. Nijmegen-1 is a potent inducer of seed germination in P. ramosa, but with an EC50 that is three orders of magnitude higher than GR24, it causes a weak germination response of S. hermonthica (Wigchert et al., 1999). In this study, we developed a new series of SL analogs, MPs that resemble the non-canonical SL methyl carlactonoate. MPs are easy to prepare and very potent in inducing seed germination of S. hermonthica seeds and in exerting several SL developmental functions, such as inhibition of tillering, triggering senescence and regulation of root architecture in Arabidopsis.
Previously, we designed a carlactone-based analog, nitro-phenlactone, that showed very weak activity in stimulating S. hermonthica germination (Jia et al., 2016). In this work, we modified the structure of nitro-phenlactone by replacing the methyl group by a methyl caroboxy group, which led to MP1, the most efficient Striga germination stimulant (EC50=1.5 × 10–9 M) among the MPs tested here. This activity was around 17 times weaker than that of GR24, pointing to MP1 as a suitable candidate for the suicidal germination approach. Very recently, we have evaluated the activity of MP1 in a trial conducted in Burkina Faso, in which we used 1 × 1 m2 wooden boxes filled with artificially infested soil and pearl millet as a host. In this experiment MP1 showed significantly higher germination activity than GR24 (to be published). The activity of MP1 in inducing seed germination in P. ramosa was quite similar to that of GR24 and only slightly weaker than that of MP2, which carries the nitro group at the ortho position, and of the chlorophenyl compound MP8. Apart from these three compounds, we observed lower germination activity with P. ramosa seeds than with those of S. hermonthica.
To test whether MPs can recover the high-tillering phenotype of the SL-deficient d10/CCD8 mutant, we used a hydroponic culture system (Fig. 4). The tillering inhibition observed with all MPs in the d10 mutant and insensitivity of the high-tillering perception mutant d3 prove that these compounds act as SL analogs via the F-box protein D3/MAX2-dependent signaling pathway. The high activity of MP3 and MP7 prompted us to quantify the effect on tillering in more detail and to determine the corresponding EC50 value. The results obtained demonstrate that both MP3 (EC50=2.98 × 10–9 M) and MP7 (EC50=2.54 × 10–8 M) are more efficient than GR24 (EC50=4.83 × 10–2 M) in restoring wild type tillering to the d10 mutant. MP1, which showed the highest activity in the S. hermonthica seed germination test, was weaker than GR24. We also observed that the treatment with several MPs (at 2.5 μM), particularly MP3, leads to growth retardation and senescence. Therefore, we tested the activity of MP3 in accelerating dark-induced leaf senescence, as reported for SLs before (Yamada et al., 2014). In this experiment, treatment with MP3 accelerated the change in leaf color and led to a decrease in chlorophyll content and an increase in electrolyte leakage, similar to GR24. Supporting data were also obtained by investigating the changes in transcript levels of the senescence-associated genes Osl295 and Osl20. These results suggest the possibility of developing MP-based post-emergence herbicides.
The growth-promoting effect of widely used GR24 on primary roots is subtle and depends on the plant species and growth conditions (Ruyter-Spira et al., 2013). Moreover, it is less pronounced than the inhibitory effect of this compound on lateral root densities (Matthys et al., 2016). Our study on the activity of MPs on root architecture in Arabidopsis demonstrates that MP7 and particularly MP1 are more efficient than GR24 in inducing the growth of primary roots and reducing the lateral root density. These results suggest that MP1 and, to a lesser extent, MP7 are better analogs for investigating the role of SLs in regulating root architecture in Arabidopsis and, likely, in other species. Interestingly, nitro-phenlactone, which lacks the enone moiety, did not affect lateral root density as reported by Jia et al. (2016). To our knowledge, MP1 is the first reported analog that outperforms GR24 in impacting root development.
Comparison of the activities of different MPs unraveled the impact of substitutions in the phenyl ring on the efficiency of these compounds in exerting specific SL functions. The lead compound, MP3, was less active than MP1 in inducing S. hermonthica seed germination but showed the most pronounced inhibitory effect on tillering. Substitutions increased the efficiency of the compounds in inducing seed germination and in regulating root architecture. Besides being the most potent compound in the S. hermonthica seed germination assay, MP1 also showed the highest activities in repressing the number of lateral roots and enhancing the length of primary roots, followed by the chlorophenyl-containing MP7 and MP8. The position of the modification is decisive. Among the chlorophenyl compounds, MP7, MP8, and MP9, we observed highest germination activity with MP7 (Cl in para position) followed by MP9 (ortho position) and MP8 (meta position).
To shed light on molecular events underlying the differences in activity between MP1, MP3, and MP7, we determined the affinity of S. hermonthica SL receptor ShHTL7 for these compounds. The results obtained were consistent with the S. hermonthica germination assay, with GR24 being the most active ligand followed by slightly weaker MP1, MP7, and finally MP3. However, we observed higher hydrolysis activities with MP3 and MP7 than with GR24. We also compared these compounds regarding their affinity and hydrolysis by the rice SL receptor D14. MP1 exhibited the highest hydrolysis rate and the lowest Kd, followed by GR24, MP3, and finally MP7. It may be speculated that the high conversion of MP1 and MP7 is due to the presence of electron withdrawing groups NO2 (MP1) and Cl (MP7), which alleviate the hydrolysis by the two receptors. In the case of ShHTL7 assays, hydrolysis and affinity results are consistent with the determined biological activity. In contrast, MP3 was the less preferred substrate in the incubations with OsD14, although it showed the highest activity in the tillering assay. This difference indicates that other factors, such as uptake and transport, are also decisive for the tillering inhibitory and growth retarding activity. However, it is also possible that hydrolysis rates determined here do not accurately reflect the situation in planta where D14 is part of a protein complex that may impact or modulate hydrolysis activity of this receptor.
Conclusions
Our findings showed that MPs are highly efficient SL analogs that can be used to investigate the biological functions of SLs and employed to combat root parasitic weeds or to modulate plant architecture. Moreover, our study demonstrated that type and position of substitutions in the phenol ring, which corresponds to the A-ring in SLs, determine and modulate the efficiency of MPs in exerting specific SL functions.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data are available at JXB online.
Fig. S1. Stability analysis of MPs in comparison with GR24.
Fig. S2. Parasitic seed germination in response to MP treatment.
Fig. S3. Effect of MPs on rice fresh biomass.
Fig. S4. Images showing the effect of selected MPs (MP1, MP3, MP7) and GR24, applied at concentration ranging from 2.5 μM to 2.5 × 10−7 μM, on tillering and growth of d10 seedlings.
Fig. S5. Effect of MPs on Arabidopsis hypocotyl length.
Table S1. Methyl phenlactonoates: physico-chemical properties.
Table S2. List of primer sequences used in the study.
Table S3. Yield and quantity of synthesized MPs.
Data deposition
The supplementary tables and figures are also available at the Dryad Data Repository: htpp://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.hq7b8
Author contributions
MJ designed experiments, performed Striga and tillering bioassays, studied leaf senescence, and wrote the manuscript. BAK helped in parasitic seed and tillering bioasays, data compiling and analysis. IH, STA, and USH conducted ShHTL7/OsD14 binding, hydrolysis studies. XG did stability analysis. VON conducted leaf senescence and SAG gene expression studies. KJ studied Arabidopsis hypocotyl length and lateral root inhibition. SA studied Arabidopsis primary root length. YL, JK, KH, and MT prepared and purified protein and carried out the hydrolysis. TA synthesized MPs and SAB designed and proposed the MP study.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation grant OPP1136424 and King Abdullah University of Science and Technology. We highly appreciate the valuable comments of Dr Jonne Rodenburg and thank Dr Binne Zwanenburg for providing GR24, Dr Junko Kyozuka for providing seeds of the rice d mutants, and Dr Abdel Gabar Babiker for providing S. hermonthica seeds.
References
- Abe S, Sado A, Tanaka K et al. 2014. Carlactone is converted to carlactonoic acid by MAX1 in Arabidopsis and its methyl ester can directly interact with AtD14 in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111, 18084–18089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Agusti J, Herold S, Schwarz M et al. 2011. Strigolactone signaling is required for auxin-dependent stimulation of secondary growth in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108, 20242–20247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akiyama K, Matsuzaki K, Hayashi H. 2005. Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 435, 824–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Babili S, Bouwmeester HJ. 2015. Strigolactones, a novel carotenoid-derived plant hormone. Annual Review of Plant Biology 66, 161–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alder A, Jamil M, Marzorati M, Bruno M, Vermathen M, Bigler P, Ghisla S, Bouwmeester H, Beyer P, Al-Babili S. 2012. The path from β-carotene to carlactone, a strigolactone-like plant hormone. Science 335, 1348–1351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beveridge CA. 2014. Strigolactones. Current Biology 24, R987–R988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Booker J, Sieberer T, Wright W, Williamson L, Willett B, Stirnberg P, Turnbull C, Srinivasan M, Goddard P, Leyser O. 2005. MAX1 encodes a cytochrome P450 family member that acts downstream of MAX3/4 to produce a carotenoid-derived branch-inhibiting hormone. Developmental Cell 8, 443–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boyer FD, de Saint Germain A, Pouvreau JB et al. 2014. New strigolactone analogs as plant hormones with low activities in the rhizosphere. Molecular Plant 7, 675–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brewer PB, Yoneyama K, Filardo F et al. 2016. LATERAL BRANCHING OXIDOREDUCTASE acts in the final stages of strigolactone biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 113, 6301–6306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruno M, Al-Babili S. 2016. On the substrate specificity of the rice strigolactone biosynthesis enzyme DWARF27. Planta 243, 1429–1440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruno M, Hofmann M, Vermathen M, Alder A, Beyer P, Al-Babili S. 2014. On the substrate- and stereospecificity of the plant carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 7. FEBS Letters 588, 1802–1807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruno M, Vermathen M, Alder A, Wüst F, Schaub P, van der Steen R, Beyer P, Ghisla S, Al-Babili S. 2017. Insights into the formation of carlactone from in-depth analysis of the CCD8-catalyzed reactions. FEBS Letters 591, 792–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charnikhova TV, Gaus K, Lumbroso A, Sanders M, Vincken JP, De Mesmaeker A, Ruyter-Spira CP, Screpanti C, Bouwmeester HJ. 2017. Zealactones. Novel natural strigolactones from maize. Phytochemistry 137, 123–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conn CE, Bythell-Douglas R, Neumann D, Yoshida S, Whittington B, Westwood JH, Shirasu K, Bond CS, Dyer KA, Nelson DC. 2015. Convergent evolution of strigolactone perception enabled host detection in parasitic plants. Science 349, 540–543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Decker EL, Alder A, Hunn S et al. 2017. Strigolactone biosynthesis is evolutionarily conserved, regulated by phosphate starvation and contributes to resistance against phytopathogenic fungi in a moss, Physcomitrella patens. New Phytologist 216, 455–468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delavault P, Montiel G, Brun G, Pouvreau J-B, Thoiron S, Simier P. 2017. Communication between host plants and parasitic plants. Advances in Botanical Research 82, 55–82. [Google Scholar]
- de Saint Germain A, Clavé G, Badet-Denisot MA et al. 2016. An histidine covalent receptor and butenolide complex mediates strigolactone perception. Nature Chemical Biology 12, 787–794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dvorakova M, Soudek P, Vanek T. 2017. Triazolide strigolactone mimics influence root development in Arabidopsis. Journal of Natural Products 80, 1318–1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ejeta G. 2007. Breeding for striga resistance in sorghum: exploitation of an intricate host-parasite biology. Crop Science 47, 216–227. [Google Scholar]
- Fukui K, Ito S, Asami T. 2013. Selective mimics of strigolactone actions and their potential use for controlling damage caused by root parasitic weeds. Molecular Plant 6, 88–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gomez-Roldan V, Fermas S, Brewer PB et al. 2008. Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature 455, 189–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ha CV, Leyva-Gonzalez MA, Osakabe Y et al. 2014. Positive regulatory role of strigolactone in plant responses to drought and salt stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111, 851–856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamiaux C, Drummond RS, Janssen BJ, Ledger SE, Cooney JM, Newcomb RD, Snowden KC. 2012. DAD2 is an α/β hydrolase likely to be involved in the perception of the plant branching hormone, strigolactone. Current Biology 22, 2032–2036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Humphrey AJ, Galster AM, Beale MH. 2006. Strigolactones in chemical ecology: waste products or vital allelochemicals?Natural Product Reports 23, 592–614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jamil M, Kanampiu FK, Karaya H, Charnikhova T, Bouwmeester HJ. 2012. Striga hermonthica parasitism in maize in response to N and P fertilisers. Field Crops Research 134, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Jia KP, Kountche BA, Jamil M, Guo X, Ntui VO, Rüfenacht A, Rochange S, Al-Babili S. 2016. Nitro-phenlactone, a carlactone analog with pleiotropic strigolactone activities. Molecular Plant 9, 1341–1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang L, Liu X, Xiong G et al. 2013. DWARF 53 acts as a repressor of strigolactone signalling in rice. Nature 504, 401–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joel DM. 2000. The long-term approach to parasitic weeds control: manipulation of specific developmental mechanisms of the parasite. Crop Protection 19, 753–758. [Google Scholar]
- Lee RH, Wang CH, Huang LT, Chen SCG. 2001. Leaf senescence in rice plants: cloning and characterization of senescence up-regulated genes. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 1117–1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li S, Chen L, Li Y, Yao R, Wang F, Yang M, Gu M, Nan F, Xie D, Yan J. 2016. Effect of GR24 stereoisomers on plant development in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant 9, 1432–1435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang Y, Ward S, Li P, Bennett T, Leyser O. 2016. SMAX1-LIKE7 signals from the nucleus to regulate shoot development in Arabidopsis via partially EAR motif-independent mechanisms. The Plant Cell 28, 1581–1601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kgosi RL, Zwanenburg B, Mwakaboko AS, Murdoch AJ. 2012. Strigolactone analogues induce suicidal seed germination of Striga spp. in soil. Weed Research 52, 197–203. [Google Scholar]
- Lumba S, Holbrook-Smith D, McCourt P. 2017. The perception of strigolactones in vascular plants. Nature Chemical Biology 13, 599–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mangnus EM, Vanvliet LA, Vandenput DAL, Zwanenburg B. 1992a. Structural modification of strigol analogs- influence of the B and C rings on the bioactivity of the germination stimulant GR24. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 40, 1222–1229. [Google Scholar]
- Mangnus EM, Dommerholt FJ, De Jong RL, Zwanenburg B. 1992b. Improved synthesis of strigol analog GR24 and evaluation of the biological activity of its diastereomers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 40, 1230–1235. [Google Scholar]
- Matthys C, Walton A, Struk S, Stes E, Boyer FD, Gevaert K, Goormachtig S. 2016. The whats, the wheres and the hows of strigolactone action in the roots. Planta 243, 1327–1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nelson DC, Flematti GR, Ghisalberti EL, Dixon KW, Smith SM. 2012. Regulation of seed germination and seedling growth by chemical signals from burning vegetation. Annual Review of Plant Biology 63, 107–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oancea F, Georgescu E, Matusova R, Georgescu F, Nicolescu A, Raut I, Jecu M-L, Vladulescu M-C, Vladulescu L, Deleanu C. 2017. New strigolactone mimics as exogenous signals for rhizosphere organisms. Molecules 22, 961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker C. 2009. Observations on the current status of Orobanche and Striga problems worldwide. Pest Management Science 65, 453–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker C. 2012. Parasitic weeds: a world challenge. Weed Science 60, 269–276. [Google Scholar]
- Pennisi E. 2010. Armed and dangerous. Science 327, 1200–1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen A, Heugebaert T, Matthys C, Van Deun R, Boyer FD, Goormachtig S, Stevens C, Geelen D. 2013. A fluorescent alternative to the synthetic strigolactone GR24. Molecular Plant 6, 100–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ritz C, Streibig JC. 2005. Bioassay analysis using R. Journal of Statistical Software 12, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Rodenburg J, Cissoko M, Kayongo N, Dieng I, Bisikwa J, Irakiza R, Masoka I, Midega CA, Scholes JD. 2017. Genetic variation and host-parasite specificity of Striga resistance and tolerance in rice: the need for predictive breeding. New Phytologist 214, 1267–1280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruyter-Spira C, Al-Babili S, van der Krol S, Bouwmeester H. 2013. The biology of strigolactones. Trends in Plant Science 18, 72–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samejima H, Babiker AG, Takikawa H, Sasaki M, Sugimoto Y. 2016. Practicality of the suicidal germination approach for controlling Striga hermonthica. Pest Management Science 72, 2035–2042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scaffidi A, Waters MT, Sun YMK, Skelton BW, Dixon KW, Ghisalberti EL, Flematti GR, Smith SM. 2014. Strigolactone hormones and their stereoisomers signal through two related receptor proteins to induce different physiological responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 165, 1221–1232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Screpanti C, Fonné-Pfister R, Lumbroso A, Rendine S, Lachia M, De Mesmaeker A. 2016. Strigolactone derivatives for potential crop enhancement applications. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 26, 2392–2400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seto Y, Sado A, Asami K, Hanada A, Umehara M, Akiyama K, Yamaguchi S. 2014. Carlactone is an endogenous biosynthetic precursor for strigolactones. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111, 1640–1645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soundappan I, Bennett T, Morffy N, Liang Y, Stanga JP, Abbas A, Leyser O, Nelson DC. 2015. SMAX1-LIKE/D53 family members enable distinct MAX2-dependent responses to strigolactones and karrikins in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 27, 3143–3159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stirnberg P, Furner IJ, Ottoline Leyser HM. 2007. MAX2 participates in an SCF complex which acts locally at the node to suppress shoot branching. The Plant Journal 50, 80–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Torres-Vera R, García JM, Pozo MJ, López-Ráez JA. 2014. Do strigolactones contribute to plant defence?Molecular Plant Pathology 15, 211–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsuchiya Y, Yoshimura M, Sato Y et al. 2015. PARASITIC PLANTS. Probing strigolactone receptors in Striga hermonthica with fluorescence. Science 349, 864–868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ueno K, Fujiwara M, Nomura S, Mizutani M, Sasaki M, Takikawa H, Sugimoto Y. 2011. Structural requirements of strigolactones for germination induction of Striga gesnerioides seeds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59, 9226–9231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ueno K, Furumoto T, Umeda S, Mizutani M, Takikawa H, Batchvarova R, Sugimoto Y. 2014. Heliolactone, a non-sesquiterpene lactone germination stimulant for root parasitic weeds from sunflower. Phytochemistry 108, 122–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Umehara M, Hanada A, Yoshida S et al. 2008. Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature 455, 195–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L, Wang B, Jiang L, Liu X, Li X, Lu Z, Meng X, Wang Y, Smith SM, Li J. 2015. Strigolactone signaling in Arabidopsis regulates shoot development by targeting D53-like SMXL repressor proteins for ubiquitination and degradation. The Plant Cell 27, 3128–3142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waters MT, Gutjahr C, Bennett T, Nelson DC. 2017. Strigolactone signaling and evolution. Annual Review of Plant Biology 68, 916–925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wigchert SC, Kuiper E, Boelhouwer GJ, Nefkens GH, Verkleij JA, Zwanenburg B. 1999. Dose-response of seeds of the parasitic weeds Striga and Orobanche toward the synthetic germination stimulants GR 24 and Nijmegen 1. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 47, 1705–1710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu L, Yang HQ. 2010. CRYPTOCHROME 1 is implicated in promoting R protein-mediated plant resistance to Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant 3, 539–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie X. 2016. Structural diversity of strigolactones and their distribution in the plant kingdom. Journal of Pesticide Science 41, 175–180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie X, Yoneyama K, Kisugi T, Uchida K, Ito S, Akiyama K, Hayashi H, Yokota T, Nomura T, Yoneyama K. 2013. Confirming stereochemical structures of strigolactones produced by rice and tobacco. Molecular Plant 6, 153–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie X, Yoneyama K, Yoneyama K. 2010. The strigolactone story. Annual Review of Phytopathology 48, 93–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie X, Zhang X, Xiang S, Yan X, Huang H, Tian Y, Shou Z, Chen J. 2017. Association of very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in peritoneal dialysis. Kidney & Blood Pressure Research 42, 52–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamada Y, Furusawa S, Nagasaka S, Shimomura K, Yamaguchi S, Umehara M. 2014. Strigolactone signaling regulates rice leaf senescence in response to a phosphate deficiency. Planta 240, 399–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yao R, Ming Z, Yan L et al. 2016. DWARF14 is a non-canonical hormone receptor for strigolactone. Nature 536, 469–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yao R, Wang F, Ming Z, Du X, Chen L, Wang Y, Zhang W, Deng H, Xie D. 2017. ShHTL7 is a non-canonical receptor for strigolactones in root parasitic weeds. Cell Research 27, 838–841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang YX, van Dijk ADJ, Scaffidi A et al. 2014. Rice cytochrome P450 MAX1 homologs catalyze distinct steps in strigolactone biosynthesis. Nature Chemical Biology 10, 1028–1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou F, Lin Q, Zhu L et al. 2013. D14-SCF(D3)-dependent degradation of D53 regulates strigolactone signalling. Nature 504, 406–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zwanenburg B, Ćavar Zeljković S, Pospíšil T. 2016b. Synthesis of strigolactones, a strategic account. Pest Management Science 72, 15–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zwanenburg B, Nayak SK, Charnikhova TV, Bouwmeester HJ. 2013. New strigolactone mimics: structure-activity relationship and mode of action as germinating stimulants for parasitic weeds. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 23, 5182–5186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zwanenburg B, Mwakaboko AS, Kannan C. 2016a. Suicidal germination for parasitic weed control. Pest Management Science 72, 2016–2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zwanenburg B, Pospísil T. 2013. Structure and activity of strigolactones: new plant hormones with a rich future. Molecular Plant 6, 38–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.