Skip to main content
NIST Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIST Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 9.
Published in final edited form as: Macromolecules. 2017 Dec 15;51(1):173–180. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01982

Characterizing the Interface Scaling of High χ Block Copolymers near the Order–Disorder Transition

Daniel F Sunday †,*, Michael J Maher , Adam F Hannon , Christopher D Liman , Summer Tein §, Gregory Blachut §, Yusuke Asano , Christopher J Ellison §,, C Grant Willson ‡,§, R Joseph Kline
PMCID: PMC5915283  NIHMSID: NIHMS943742  PMID: 29706666

Abstract

Advancements in the directed self-assembly of block copolymers (BCPs) have prompted the development of new materials with larger effective interaction parameters (χe). This enables BCP systems with phase separation at increasingly small degrees of polymerization (N). Very often these systems reside near the order–disorder transition and fit between the weak and strong segregation limits where the behavior of BCP systems is not as thoroughly understood. Utilizing resonant soft X-ray reflectivity (RSoXR) enables both the BCP pitch (L0) and interface width (wM) to be determined simultaneously, through a direct characterization of the composition profile of BCP lamellae oriented parallel to a substrate. A series of high χe BCPs with χe ranging from ≈0.04 to 0.25 and χeN from 19 to 70 have been investigated. The L0/wm ratio serves as an important metric for the feasibility of a material for nanopatterning applications; the results of the RSoXR measurement are used to establish a relationship between χe and L0/wm. The results of this analysis are correlated with experimentally established limits for the functionality of BCPs in nanopatterning applications. These results also provide guidance for the magnitude of χe needed to achieve small interface width for samples with sub-10 nm L0.

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms943742u1.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Block copolymers (BCPs) offer intriguing possibilities1 as templates for patterning membranes,24 metal oxides,5,6 and other lithographically useful structures.710 The most commonly studied BCPs offer accessibility to feature size and domain period (pitch) length scales between 20 and 100 nm.11,12 The demonstration of directed self-assembly (DSA) of BCPs as a viable lithographic approach for the semiconductor industry has spurred the development of new BCPs with full pitches below 20 nm and larger inherent etch contrasts.1323 Smaller pitches have been achieved by the development of BCPs with large effective Flory–Huggins interaction parameters (χe), enabling ordered nanostructures where the degree of polymerization (N) is less than 50 monomer units.24 Most predictions of the interface or pitch (L0) scaling assume a sufficiently large N to neglect the effects of chain size.2528 As a result, these new high χe, low N materials reside in a parameter space that has received relatively little exploration. Most studies on high χe BCPs have focused on characterizing L0, the order–disorder transition (ODT) temperature, and χe but have neglected to examine the interface width, which is a potentially limiting factor in the process. Here, we examine the interface width and L0 scaling of a series of high χe silicon-containing BCPs which are currently being explored as candidates for high throughput patterning at sub-20 nm pitch (i.e., sub-10 nm features sizes).29

BCP structure, including domain period and morphology, has generally been described by self-consistent field theory (SCFT) where the properties are a function of the volume faction (fi), statistical segment lengths (b), and the segregation strength χeN (N is the volumetric degree of polymerization calculated according to eq 1 using a common reference volume v0 = 118 Å3 where Mn is the number-average molecular mass, ρ is the polymer density, and NA is Avogadro’s constant). SCFT predicts that for an AB diblock copolymer with fA = 0.5 the ODT occurs at (χeN)ODT ≅ 10.5.25,26, This result may not be accurate for materials with a large χe and low N, both due to potential deviations from Gaussian chain behavior and due to the impact of composition fluctuations. Several efforts have been made to develop theories which better reflect the behavior of BCPs under these conditions. For example, Fredrickson–Helfand theory introduces a correction to the ODT prediction which results in an increase in (χeN)ODT for shorter polymer chains to account for fluctuation effects.30 The renormalized one-loop theory (ROL) was developed in an attempt to model BCP behavior over a wide parameter space. Unlike the earlier theories which depend on N, predictions made by this theory depend on the invariant degree of polymerization, N¯(N¯=Nb6/v02).24,31,32 ROL predicts that composition fluctuations result in an upward shift of (χeN)ODT according to eq 2, which is an empirical relationship derived by analyzing the results of multiple simulation models. The L0 scaling of lamellar BCPs depends on whether the system is in the weak-segregation-limit regime (WSL, χN near the ODT), where L0N1/2 or the strong-segregation-limit regime (SSL, χN ≫ 10.5) where L0χe 1/6N2/3. A crossover regime where L0N4/5 has also been observed while transitioning between the WSL and the SSL.3336

N=Mnρv0NA (1)
(χeN)ODT=10.495+41N¯1/3+123N¯0.56 (2)

In addition to the pitch scaling, there has also been significant investigation into the interface between the two components of a BCP.3740 In the WSL the BCP profile is expected to take a sinusoidal shape and show incomplete segregation of the two blocks. In the SSL the two blocks are expected to show a square wave profile with an interface width being inversely proportional to χe1/2. The interface width between BCP components is typically measured using specular X-ray or neutron reflectivity, which measures the scattering length density (SLD) profile as a function of depth in the film.4044 The SLD profile can then be transformed into a composition profile, allowing direct investigation of the composition of a BCP with lamella orientated parallel to the substrate. Historically, neutron reflectivity was the primary tool for these measurements, as the contrast between organic materials for hard X-rays was typically insufficient for accurate structural determination. The drawback to this technique is that it generally requires one of the blocks to be deuterated to enhance the contrast and reduce the incoherent background. This can be synthetically challenging for some materials and can influence the thermodynamics between the blocks.45 Resonant soft X-ray reflectivity (RSoXR) has emerged recently as a method for enhancing contrast of the native materials based on the type and density of chemical functional groups in the blocks.4650 In the soft X-ray region (100–3000 eV) there are absorption edges for the atoms which are the primary constituents of most polymers, carbon (≅285 eV), nitrogen (≅400 eV), and oxygen (≅540 eV). In the vicinity of the absorption edge, the complex refractive index (n = 1 − (λ2/2π)[ρRIm], where λ is the wavelength, ρR is the real, or dispersive, component, and ρIm is the imaginary, or absorptive, component in terms of SLD) will vary sharply. The magnitude of this change depends on the proximity of the beam energy to the absorption edge location (which will shift depending on the exact chemistry) and density of the functional groups. The measured interface width from this composition profile (wM) is determined by modeling the interface as an error function, and the width of the error function (σ) is then converted to wM using eq 3.

wM=σ2π (3)

Accurate characterization of the interfacial width is important for lithographic materials as it is potentially a limiting factor in the performance of a BCP as an etch mask.51 Polystyrene-b-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PS-b-PMMA) is the most commonly explored material for lithographic applications, but it suffers from a number of limitations. Recent results have shown that while the material will form regular patterns down to L0 ≅ 18 nm, the pattern will not effectively transfer to the underlying substrate at that length scale.11 Additionally, PS-b-PMMA generally requires enhanced etch selectivity through an additional process such as sequential infiltration synthesis.5254 The combination of these two challenges has prompted the development of new BCPs capable of achieving smaller pitches and/or with inherently larger etch contrast. Larger χe are generally achieved by increasing the difference in polarity between the two blocks. For example, the addition of a tert-butyl group to the PS block of PS-b-PMMA enables L0 as small as 14 nm and a significant shift in the temperature dependence of χe.20 Sub-10 nm domains have been achieved using this approach with poly(cyclohexylethylene)-b-PMMA21 and recently feature sizes as small as 3 nm have been fabricated.55 There is also some evidence that higher χe will lead to a reduction in the line edge roughness (LER).51 LER values above a tolerable threshold will lead to a deterioration in the electrical properties of the integrated circuit. The degree to which the interface width correlates directly to changes in LER is still unknown.

Silicon-containing BCPs can achieve small pitches and have the advantage of inherently high etch contrast. Block copolymers with poly(dimethylsiloxane) are capable of achieving small feature sizes and good etch transfer to the underlying substrate.14,17,56,57 In addition to polymers with silicon in the backbone, a series of BCPs with silicon-containing pendant groups have recently been synthesized and studied for DSA applications.15,5860 These include (in order of increasing χe) PS-b-poly(trimethylsilylstyrene) (PS-b-PTMSS), PS-b-poly-(pentamethyldisylilstyrene) (PS-b-PDSS), poly(4-methoxystyrene)-b-PTMSS (PMOST-b-PTMSS), PMOST-b-PDSS, and poly(5-vinyl-1,3-benzodioxole)-b-PDSS (PVBD-b-PDSS). DSA of PVBD-b-PDSS was recently demonstrated with half-pitches of 5 nm on a hybrid chemo/graphoepitaxial template.

In this study we examine the interface width and L0 scaling for a series of BCPs with χe ranging from ≅0.04 (a similar magnitude to that of PS-b-PMMA)61 to ≅0.25 (as determined by SAXS measurements on materials in the disordered phase). The interface widths are characterized using RSoXR to enhance the scattering contrast between the two blocks. Limits on the ratio of wM/L0 are explored as a function of χeN, which helps explain experimental results demonstrating lower pitch limits on BCP etch transfer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample Preparation

Block copolymers were prepared via anionic polymerization using the techniques described by Durand et al.15 Block copolymer solutions (3–5 wt % in methyl isobutyl ketone) were spin coated between 1500 and 3000 rpm to create smooth films on a silicon wafer with native oxide. In this study, it is generally observed that the silicon-containing block prefers to wet the air interface while the other block prefers to wet the substrate surface. The film thicknesses were (n + 0.5)L0 where n is an integer. Films were annealed at 180 °C for 10 min and inspected by optical microscopy to confirm that no topography formed during the annealing process.

RSoXR

RSoXR measurements were performed at the Advanced Light Source (ALS) at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory using beamline 6.3.2. Measurements at the carbon edge (260–300 eV) were conducted using a 600 mm−1 grating, a 600 nm Ti filter, and a Burle CEM detector.62 Measurements at the oxygen edge (520–540 eV) were conducted using a 1200 mm−1 grating, a Cr filter, and the Burle CEM detector. The data were fit using the Refl1D program and uncertainties determined using the differential evolution adaptive metropolis (DREAM) algorithm.63

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The properties of the BCPs examined in this study are outlined in Table 1. For all samples the interaction parameter was previously determined using SAXS measurements in the disordered state.15,60

Table 1.

Sample Parameters, χe, wM, and L0 from RSoXR Measurements

sample name Mn [kg/mol] (A block) Mn [kg/mol] (B block) Na χe(SAXS)b at 180 °C χeN (SAXS) wM (Å) L0 (Å)
PS-b-PTMSS392 14.0 14.4 392 0.047 19.1 63.9 [−3.9/+9.8] 179 ± 2.7
PS-b-PTMSS478 16.7 17.4 478 0.047 23.3 53.6 [1.3/+5.3]   216 ± 2.6
PS-b-PTMSS656 23.7 23.2 656 0.047 32.0 44.6 [−1.0/+6.9] 264 ± 2.7
PS-b-PDSS426 15.0 14.7 426 0.112 52.3 34.2 [−1.4/+3.8] 195 ± 2.2
PMOST-b-PTMSS369 14.4 13.0 369 0.135 58.7 29.8 [−0.8/+1.3] 189 ± 2.3
PMOST-b-PDSS182   7.4   5.9 182 0.195 38.5 22.0 [−1.3/+2.0] 129 ± 2.3
PMOST-b-PDSS251   9.7   8.5 251 0.195 53.0 22.4 [−1.2/+1.8] 162 ± 2.4
PMOST-b-PDSS345 12.3 12.5 345 0.195 72.7 22.8 [−1.3/+1.8] 208 ± 2.4
PVBD-b-PDSS218   8.9   7.4 218 0.25   65.3 19.0 [−1.1/+1.9] 154 ± 2.1
PVBD-b-PDSS261 11.0   8.6 261 0.25   54.5 20.6 [−1.6/+2.6] 181 ± 2.3
a

N was calculated using eq 1, densities were experimentally determined previously,15 and a common reference volume of v0 = 118 Å3 was used for all samples.

b

All values were calculated at 180 °C, based on SAXS measurements of disordered materials.15

The results of the RSoXR measurements on the PMOST-b-PDSS series are shown in Figure 1, where χeN ranged from 32 to 60. The reflectivity curves (Figure 1A) show the classic multilayer signature of a BCP oriented parallel to the substrate. The higher frequency fringes correspond to the total thickness of the film, and the longer spacing between the Bragg peaks corresponds to the L0 of the polymer. The film prepared from the lowest molecular weight sample (PMOST-b-PDSS182) has the greatest number of repeating layers in the film (9 full multilayers) and as a result had the sharpest Bragg peaks. The Bragg peak intensity is a function of both the contrast between the layers and the total number of repeating layers. Both the second-order (q ≅ 0.14 Å−1) and third-order (q ≅ 0.24 Å−1) Bragg peaks are clearly visible, showing the slow decay of the Bragg peak intensity. The best fit to this sample results in a wM = 22.0 [−1.3/+2.0] Å. The samples with larger molecular weights (PMOST-b-PDSS251, PMOST-b-PDSS345) show similar behaviors, including both the high frequency fringes and the lower frequency Bragg peaks. As the molecular weight increases, the spacing between the Bragg peaks decreases, consistent with the increase in the BCP domain pitch. The magnitude of the Bragg peaks also decreases because of the reduced number of multilayers in the film. All three samples at different Mn show effectively the same wM at 22.4 [−1.2/+1.8] Å and 22.8 [−1.3/+1.8] Å for PMOST-b-PDSS251 and PMOST-b-PDSS345, respectively. All samples show asymmetry in the uncertainties for wM, with the uncertainty in the positive direction being larger than the uncertainty in the negative direction. Shrinking the interface width has a larger impact on the simulated reflectivity than increasing it, and this results in the asymmetry of the uncertainty.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Experimental (colored ○) and simulated fits (solid lines) for PMOST-b-PDSS for N = 182, 251, and 345. Measurements were collected at either 282 or 282.5 eV. The corresponding SLD (solid lines indicate ρR, dashed lines indicate ρIm) and SLD/composition plots are shown in B (N = 182), C (N = 251), and D (N = 345). Composition plots exceed 1 at the SiO2 layer.

In addition to the results shown in Figure 1, RSoXR measurements were conducted on the remainder of the samples outlined in Table 1. The pitch scaling was explored in order to place the results in context with the behavior of previously investigated BCPs with similar χeN. The results of those measurements are shown in the Supporting Information. Figure 2 shows a ln–ln plot of L0 as a function of N for the three series where multiple molecular masses were examined. All three series show L0N3/4, a stronger scaling than predicted in either the WSL (N1/2) or SSL (N2/3). The scaling observed here is closer to previous results which sometimes observed an N4/5 scaling in samples with similar χeN (35–80), a regime which is associated with stretched Gaussian coils.3336 The origin of the scaling behavior in this region is unclear, but it is shown here to be consistent among samples with a range of χe.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Plot showing ln(L0) as a function of ln(N); all sample sets show slopes of ≈0.75.

For high molecular weight BCPs the interface width is generally small relative to the pitch; for systems near the ODT, the interface region can constitute a significant portion of the BCP. Figure 3 shows the ratio of wM/L0 as a function of χeN. The PS-b-PTMSS series ranges between χeN = 15 and 35, and in this region wM/L0 can be seen to increase rapidly with decreasing χeN, particularly as the ODT is approached (using eq 2 the (χeN)ODT ≈ 13–15 for most systems investigated in this study). For χeN > 30 the wM/L0 gradually reduces with increasing χeN; this effect is well captured by the PMOST-b-PDSS series which spans 40 < χeN < 70. The two materials with the largest χeN investigated show wM/L0 of just above 0.10. There is some spread in the data in this region, which may be caused in part by conformational asymmetry between the two components of the block copolymer which is not captured in this straightforward scaling approach.64,65 Separating the results into regions above and below χeN = 35 allows two different scaling relationships to be extracted from wm/L0 ∼ (χeN)ω. In the region below χeN = 35, ω ≈ −3/2; above χeN = 35, ω ≈ −2/3. Attempting to fit this data with a single power law exponent generally resulted in poor fits to the data below χeN = 35; given that the pitch scaling is well-known, this suggests a shift in the scaling of the interface width as the ODT is approached. Experimental results have shown that when wm/L0 ≥ 0.27, etch transfer of a DSA patterned BCP results in large numbers of defects; this limit in relation to the samples investigated in this study is marked in Figure 3. The origin of this behavior can be explained by examining the composition profiles as a function of χeN.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Ratio of wm/L0 as a function of χeN. From these results a scaling relationship can be extracted, wm/L0 ∼ (χeN)ω. For χeN < 35 ω ≈ −3/2, and for χeN > 35 ω ≈ −2/3. For systems with wm/L0 above 0.27 (dashed line) experimental results have shown a loss of alignment upon etching one of the components in the polymer.11

The impact of the interface width on the composition profile is captured in Figure 4, which shows the composition profiles for BCP samples with χeN ranging from 19.1 to 72.7. The profiles are normalized by the BCP L0 to compare materials with a wide range of L0 on the same graph. PS-b-PTMSS392 has the lowest χeN value (19.1) and shows both a sinusoidal composition profile and evidence of incomplete phase segregation (i.e., significant regions with composition very close to 1.0 or 0.0 are not observed). PS-b-PTMSS478 has a slightly larger χeN (23.3) and now shows a narrow region of complete phase segregation near the center of the lamella. As χeN increases, the composition profile rapidly shows signs of increasing phase separation. Increasing χeN to 38.3 (PMOST-b-PDSS182) shows a clear transition to the square wave profile associated with the SSL, although the interface still makes up a considerable portion of the profile. PMOST-b-PDSS345 has the largest χeN examined in this study and results in lamella with a narrow interface. The incomplete phase segregation at χeN = 19.1 demonstrates why this represents a lower limit on the patterning ability of BCPs. While the overall structure still results in a lamellar morphology local composition fluctuations are significant enough to result in incomplete phase segregation at many positions along the lamellae. Upon etch transfer these composition fluctuations result in defects. This could be even more problematic near the neutral brush, which likely acts as a compatibilizer and shifts the local (χeN)ODT to a higher value.12 Both TEM and scattering measurements have suggested that the magnitude of fluctuations increases near the neutral brush.66,67 It is also possible that this effective patterning limit will shift for BCPs with lower N, where composition fluctuation effects may have a greater impact.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Composition profile for BCPs with χeN = 191 (PS-b-PTMSS392), χeN = 23.3 (PS-b-PTMSS478), χeN = 38.5 (PMOST-b-PDSS182), and χeN = 72.7 (PS-b-PTMSS345). The profiles are normalized by L0 in order to compare the shape of the composition profile for the BCPs on the same scale. They are also shifted in order to account for the small differences in the SiO2 thickness in the model so that the minima and maxima of the profiles are centered at the same location.

The lower accessible limit of wM/L0 for a given L0 will depend on χe and therefore vary depending on the BCP system. This is explored in Figure 5 where wM/L0 is shown as a function of L0. PS-b-PTMSS has the lowest χe of the BCPs investigated in this study, at χe ≅ 0.04. As a result, when L0 decreases, wM/L0 increases rapidly, reaching 0.35 at L0 = 179 Å, demonstrating that this system likely has a similar lower accessible pitch limit as PS-b-PMMA, which is consistent with the similar magnitude of χe for the two materials. As discussed in the previous paragraph, this sample shows incomplete phase segregation. This sample series demonstrates that for a material with this χe there is a clear barrier to achieving smaller L0 < 100 Å while maintaining a sufficiently small interface width. As χe increases, this limit shifts to progressively lower values. PS-b-PDSS has a χe ≅ 0.11, and wM/L0 was found to be 0.17 at L0 = 195 Å, a 40% reduction over the expected value for a PS-b-PTMSS sample with identical pitch (wM/L0 for PS-b-PTMSS with this pitch as extrapolated from the trend). This trend is continued as the BCPs with higher χe are examined, shifting the lower limits of wM/L0. A rough extrapolation of the data for PMOST-b-PDSS suggests that this system could reach a lower patterning limit of L0 ≈ 90 Å. While there is insufficient data to determine the lower limit of the PVBD-b-PDSS series, experimental results have demonstrated patterning and etch transfer down to L0 ≈ 100 Å, suggesting that the lower limits lie at even smaller L0. Extrapolating from these results also provides an estimate for the magnitude of χe which will be needed to obtain wM/L0 < 0.1 and L0 < 100 Å, which is χe ≈ 0.6–0.7. This is on the order of the value reported for a recently synthesized polymer, polydihydroxystyrene-b-PS,55 providing additional hope that new BCPs can provide solutions to the patterning needs of next-generation technology nodes.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

wM/L0 as a function of L0 for all BCP samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Block copolymer lithography requires materials with sufficiently low wm/L0 so that the composition fluctuations do not result in defects during etch transfer and the resulting LER does not inhibit electrical performance. By use of RSoXR, the composition profile of a series of high χe BCPs was characterized and wm/L0 was extracted. This value was scaled as a function of χeN, demonstrating a rapid increase as the ODT is approached, and below χeN = 20 incomplete phase segregation in the composition profile is observed. This coincides with experimental results showing difficulty in obtaining good etch transfer for a system with similar wm/L0, which provides strong evidence that composition fluctuations limited the etch transfer and that wm/L0 ≈ 0.27 represents an upper limit for effective BCP lithography. wm/L0 was also scaled as a function of L0, demonstrating a shift in the lower accessible L0 under this limit with increasing χe.

Supplementary Material

Supp1

Acknowledgments

The Advanced Light Source is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231. We thank Eric Gullikson for assistance at BL. 6.3.2. and Paul Kienzle for the work developing the Refl1D software. The authors thank Nissan Chemical Industries, Lam Research, the ASTC, and the National Science Foundation (Grants EECS-1120823 and EEC-1160494) for financial support. M.J.M. thanks National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (Grant DGE-1110007) for financial support. C.J.E. thanks the Welch Foundation (Grant #F-1709) for partial financial support. G.W. thanks the Rashid Engineering Regents Chair and the Welch Foundation (Grant #F-1830) for partial financial support. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the sponsors.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01982.

Figures S1–S4 (PDF)

ORCID

Daniel F. Sunday: 0000-0002-6840-535X

Michael J. Maher: 0000-0003-0577-3726

Adam F. Hannon: 0000-0002-7015-6858

Gregory Blachut: 0000-0002-8539-4840

Christopher J. Ellison: 0000-0002-0393-2941

C. Grant Willson: 0000-0002-2072-3981

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  • 1.Bates CM, Bates FS. 50th Anniversary Perspective: Block Polymers—Pure Potential. Macromolecules. 2017;50(1):3–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arges CG, Kambe Y, Suh HS, Ocola LE, Nealey PF. Perpendicularly Aligned, Anion Conducting Nanochannels in Block Copolymer Electrolyte Films. Chem Mater. 2016;28(5):1377–1389. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kamachi M, Kurihara M, Stille JK. Synthesis of Block Polymers for Desalination Membranes. Preparation of Block Copolymers of 2-Vinylpyridine and Methacrylic Acid or Acrylic Acid. Macromolecules. 1972;5(2):161–167. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Geise GM, Freeman BD, Paul DR. Characterization of a Sulfonated Pentablock Copolymer for Desalination Applications. Polymer. 2010;51(24):5815–5822. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kamcev J, Germack DS, Nykypanchuk D, Grubbs RB, Nam C-Y, Black CT. Chemically Enhancing Block Copolymers for Block-Selective Synthesis of Self-Assembled Metal Oxide Nanostructures. ACS Nano. 2013;7(1):339–346. doi: 10.1021/nn304122b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schulze MW, Sinturel C, Hillmyer MA. Poly-(Cyclohexylethylene)- Block -Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Block Polymers for Metal Oxide Templating. ACS Macro Lett. 2015;4(9):1027–1032. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Luo M, Epps TH. Directed Block Copolymer Thin Film Self-Assembly: Emerging Trends in Nanopattern Fabrication. Macromolecules. 2013;46:7567. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim SO, Solak HH, Stoykovich MP, Ferrier NJ, de Pablo JJ, Nealey PF. Epitaxial Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers on Lithographically Defined Nanopatterned Substrates. Nature. 2003;424(6947):411–414. doi: 10.1038/nature01775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ruiz R, Kang H, Detcheverry FA, Dobisz E, Kercher DS, Albrecht TR, de Pablo JJ, Nealey PF. Density Multiplication and Improved Lithography by Directed Block Copolymer Assembly. Science. 2008;321(5891):936–939. doi: 10.1126/science.1157626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bates CM, Maher MJ, Janes DW, Ellison CJ, Willson CG. Block Copolymer Lithography. Macromolecules. 2014;47(1):2–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wan L, Ruiz R, Gao H, Patel KC, Albrecht TR, Yin J, Kim J, Cao Y, Lin G. The Limits of Lamellae-Forming PS-b-PMMA Block Copolymers for Lithography. ACS Nano. 2015;9(7):7506–7514. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b02613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim E, Choi S, Guo R, Ryu DY, Hawker CJ, Russell TP. Transition Behavior of PS-b-PMMA Films on the Balanced Interfacial Interactions. Polymer. 2010;51(26):6313–6318. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sweat DP, Kim M, Larson SR, Choi JW, Choo Y, Osuji CO, Gopalan P. Rational Design of a Block Copolymer with a High Interaction Parameter. Macromolecules. 2014;47(19):6687–6696. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cushen JD, Otsuka I, Bates CM, Halila S, Fort S, Rochas C, Easley JA, Rausch EL, Thio A, Borsali R, Willson CG, Ellison CJ. Oligosaccharide/Silicon-Containing Block Copolymers with 5 Nm Features for Lithographic Applications. ACS Nano. 2012;6(4):3424–3433. doi: 10.1021/nn300459r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Durand WJ, Blachut G, Maher MJ, Sirard S, Tein S, Carlson MC, Asano Y, Zhou SX, Lane AP, Bates CM, Ellison CJ, Willson CG. Design of High-χ Block Copolymers for Lithography. J Polym Sci, Part A: Polym Chem. 2015;53(2):344–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Maher MJ, Mori K, Sirard SM, Dinhobl AM, Bates CM, Gurer E, Blachut G, Lane AP, Durand WJ, Carlson MC, Strahan JR, Ellison CJ, Willson CG. Pattern Transfer of Sub-10 Nm Features via Tin-Containing Block Copolymers. ACS Macro Lett. 2016;5(3):391–395. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Luo Y, Montarnal D, Kim S, Shi W, Barteau KP, Pester CW, Hustad PD, Christianson MD, Fredrickson GH, Kramer EJ, Hawker CJ. Poly(Dimethylsiloxane-b-Methyl Methacrylate): A Promising Candidate for Sub-10 Nm Patterning. Macromolecules. 2015;48(11):3422–3430. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shi W, Tateishi Y, Li W, Hawker CJ, Fredrickson GH, Kramer EJ. Producing Small Domain Features Using Miktoarm Block Copolymers with Large Interaction Parameters. ACS Macro Lett. 2015;4(11):1287–1292. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sinturel C, Bates FS, Hillmyer MA. High X–Low N Block Polymers: How Far Can We Go? ACS Macro Lett. 2015;4(9):1044–1050. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kennemur JG, Hillmyer MA, Bates FS. Synthesis, Thermodynamics, and Dynamics of Poly(4- Tert-Butylstyrene- b -Methyl Methacrylate) Macromolecules. 2012;45(17):7228–7236. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kennemur JG, Yao L, Bates FS, Hillmyer MA. Sub-5 Nm Domains in Ordered Poly(Cyclohexylethylene)- Block -Poly-(Methyl Methacrylate) Block Polymers for Lithography. Macromolecules. 2014;47(4):1411–1418. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vora A, Wojtecki RJ, Schmidt K, Chunder A, Cheng JY, Nelson A, Sanders DP. Development of Polycarbonate-Containing Block Copolymers for Thin Film Self-Assembly Applications. Polym Chem. 2016;7(4):940–950. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang G-W, Wu G-P, Chen X, Xiong S, Arges CG, Ji S, Nealey PF, Lu X-B, Darensbourg DJ, Xu Z-K. Directed Self-Assembly of Polystyrene-b-Poly(Propylene Carbonate) on Chemical Patterns via Thermal Annealing for Next Generation Lithography. Nano Lett. 2017;17(2):1233–1239. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gillard TM, Medapuram P, Morse DC, Bates FS. Fluctuations, Phase Transitions, and Latent Heat in Short Diblock Copolymers: Comparison of Experiment, Simulation, and Theory. Macromolecules. 2015;48(8):2801–2811. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bates FS, Fredrickson GH. Block Copolymer Thermodynamics: Theory and Experiment. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 1990;41(1):525–557. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pc.41.100190.002521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Leibler L. Theory of Microphase Separation in Block Copolymers. Macromolecules. 1980;13(6):1602–1617. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Broseta D, Fredrickson GH, Helfand E, Leibler L. Molecular Weight and Polydispersity Effects at Polymer-Polymer Interfaces. Macromolecules. 1990;23(1):132–139. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Helfand E, Tagami Y. Theory of the Interface between Immiscible Polymers. II. J Chem Phys. 1972;56(7):3592. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Blachut G, Sirard SM, Maher MJ, Asano Y, Someya Y, Lane AP, Durand WJ, Bates CM, Dinhobl AM, Gronheid R, Hymes D, Ellison CJ, Willson CG. A Hybrid Chemo-/Grapho-Epitaxial Alignment Strategy for Defect Reduction in Sub-10 Nm Directed Self-Assembly of Silicon-Containing Block Copolymers. Chem Mater. 2016;28(24):8951–8961. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fredrickson GH, Helfand E. Fluctuation Effects in the Theory of Microphase Separation in Block Copolymers. J Chem Phys. 1987;87(1):697. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Medapuram P, Glaser J, Morse DC. Universal Phenomenology of Symmetric Diblock Copolymers near the Order–Disorder Transition. Macromolecules. 2015;48(3):819–839. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Glaser J, Qin J, Medapuram P, Müller M, Morse DC. Test of a Scaling Hypothesis for the Structure Factor of Disordered Diblock Copolymer Melts. Soft Matter. 2012;8(44):11310. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sivaniah E, Hayashi Y, Matsubara S, Kiyono S, Hashimoto T, Fukunaga K, Kramer EJ, Mates T. Symmetric Diblock Copolymer Thin Films on Rough Substrates. Kinetics and Structure Formation in Pure Block Copolymer Thin Films. Macromolecules. 2005;38(5):1837–1849. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Almdal K, Rosedale JH, Bates FS, Wignall GD, Fredrickson GH. Gaussian-to Stretched-Coil Transition in Block Copolymer Melts. Phys Rev Lett. 1990;65(9):1112. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hadziioannou G, Skoulios A. Molecular Weight Dependence of Lamellar Structure in Styrene Isoprene Two-and Three-Block Copolymers. Macromolecules. 1982;15(2):258–262. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Papadakis CM, Almdal K, Mortensen K, Posselt D. Identification of an Intermediate-Segregation Regime in a Diblock Copolymer System. EPL Europhys Lett. 1996;36(4):289. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Foster MD, Sikka M, Singh N, Bates FS, Satija SK, Majkrzak CF. Structure of Symmetric Polyolefin Block Copolymer Thin Films. J Chem Phys. 1992;96(11):96. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Winey KI, Thomas EL, Fetters LJ. Ordered Morphologies in Binary Blends of Diblock Copolymer and Homopolymer and Characterization of Their Intermaterial Dividing Surfaces. J Chem Phys. 1991;95:9367. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Scherble J, Stark B, Stühn B, Kressler J, Budde H, Höring S, Schubert DW, Simon P, Stamm M. Comparison of Interfacial Width of Block Copolymers of d 8 -Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) with Various Poly(n -Alkyl Methacrylate)s and the Respective Homopolymer Pairs as Measured by Neutron Reflection. Macromolecules. 1999;32(6):1859–1864. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Russell TP, Anastasiadis SH, Menelle A, Felcher GP, Satija SK. Segment Density Distribution of Symmetric Diblock Copolymers at the Interface between Two Homopolymers as Revealed by Neutron Reflectivity. Macromolecules. 1991;24(7):1575–1582. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Russell TP. On the Reflectivity of Polymers: Neutrons and X-Rays. Phys B. 1996;221(1):267–283. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Russell TP, Menelle A, Hamilton WA, Smith GS, Satija SK, Majkrzak CF. Width of Homopolymer Interfaces in the Presence of Symmetric Diblock Copolymers. Macromolecules. 1991;24(20):5721–5726. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Anastasiadis SH, Russell TP, Satija SK, Majkrzak CF. The Morphology of Symmetric Diblock Copolymers as Revealed by Neutron Reflectivity. J Chem Phys. 1990;92(9):92. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stamm M. Investigation of the Interface between Polymers: A Comparison of Scattering and Reflectivity Techniques. J Appl Crystallogr. 1991;24(5):651–658. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Harton SE, Stevie FA, Zhu Z, Ade H. Changes in Thermodynamic Interactions at Highly Immiscible Polymer/Polymer Interfaces Due to Deuterium Labeling. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110(22):10602–10605. doi: 10.1021/jp061811d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang C, Araki T, Ade H. Soft X-Ray Resonant Reflectivity of Low-Z Material Thin Films. Appl Phys Lett. 2005;87(21):87. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ade H, Wang C, Garcia A, Yan H, Sohn KE, Hexemer A, Bazan GC, Nguyen T-Q, Kramer EJ. Characterization of Multicomponent Polymer Trilayers with Resonant Soft X-Ray Reflectivity. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys. 2009;47(13):1291–1299. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yan H, Wang C, Garcia A, Swaraj S, Gu Z, McNeill CR, Schuettfort T, Sohn KE, Kramer EJ, Bazan GC, Nguyen T-Q, Ade H. Interfaces in Organic Devices Studied with Resonant Soft X-Ray Reflectivity. J Appl Phys. 2011;110(10):110. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mezger M, Ocko BM, Reichert H, Deutsch M. Surface Layering and Melting in an Ionic Liquid Studied by Resonant Soft X-Ray Reflectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(10):3733–3737. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211749110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sunday DF, Kline RJ. Reducing Block Copolymer Interfacial Widths through Polymer Additives. Macromolecules. 2015;48(3):679–686. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kim JM, Hur YH, Jeong JW, Nam TW, Lee JH, Jeon K, Kim Y, Jung YS. Block Copolymer with an Extremely High Block-to-Block Interaction for a Significant Reduction of Line-Edge Fluctuations in Self-Assembled Patterns. Chem Mater. 2016;28:5680. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Peng Q, Tseng Y-C, Darling SB, Elam JW. A Route to Nanoscopic Materials via Sequential Infiltration Synthesis on Block Copolymer Templates. ACS Nano. 2011;5(6):4600–4606. doi: 10.1021/nn2003234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tseng Y-C, Peng Q, Ocola LE, Elam JW, Darling SB. Enhanced Block Copolymer Lithography Using Sequential Infiltration Synthesis. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115(36):17725–17729. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tseng Y-C, Peng Q, Ocola LE, Czaplewski DA, Elam JW, Darling SB. Etch Properties of Resists Modified by Sequential Infiltration Synthesis. J Vac Sci Technol, B: Nanotechnol Microelectron: Mater, Process, Meas, Phenom. 2011;29(6):06FG01. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kwak J, Mishra AK, Lee J, Lee KS, Choi C, Maiti S, Kim M, Kim JK. Fabrication of Sub-3 Nm Feature Size Based on Block Copolymer Self-Assembly for Next-Generation Nanolithography. Macromolecules. 2017;50(17):6813–6818. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Son JG, Hannon AF, Gotrik KW, Alexander-Katz A, Ross CA. Hierarchical Nanostructures by Sequential Self-Assembly of Styrene-Dimethylsiloxane Block Copolymers of Different Periods. Adv Mater. 2011;23(5):634–639. doi: 10.1002/adma.201002999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rodwogin MD, Spanjers CS, Leighton C, Hillmyer MA. Polylactide–Poly(Dimethylsiloxane)–Polylactide Triblock Copolymers as Multifunctional Materials for Nanolithographic Applications. ACS Nano. 2010;4(2):725–732. doi: 10.1021/nn901190a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Maher MJ, Rettner CT, Bates CM, Blachut G, Carlson MC, Durand WJ, Ellison CJ, Sanders DP, Cheng JY, Willson CG. Directed Self-Assembly of Silicon-Containing Block Copolymer Thin Films. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(5):3323–3328. doi: 10.1021/am508197k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cushen J, Wan L, Blachut G, Maher MJ, Albrecht TR, Ellison CJ, Willson CG, Ruiz R. Double-Patterned Sidewall Directed Self-Assembly and Pattern Transfer of Sub-10 Nm PTMSS-b-PMOST. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(24):13476–13483. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b02481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lane AP, Yang X, Maher MJ, Blachut G, Asano Y, Someya Y, Mallavarapu A, Sirard SM, Ellison CJ, Willson CG. Directed Self-Assembly and Pattern Transfer of Five Nanometer Block Copolymer Lamellae. ACS Nano. 2017;11:7656. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b02698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhao Y, Sivaniah E, Hashimoto T. SAXS Analysis of the Order- Disorder Transition and the Interaction Parameter of Polystyrene-Block-Poly (Methyl Methacrylate) Macromolecules. 2008;41(24):9948–9951. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this paper in order to specify the experimental procedure adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
  • 63.Vrugt JA, Ter Braak CJF. DREAM(D): An Adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation Algorithm to Solve Discrete, Noncontinuous, and Combinatorial Posterior Parameter Estimation Problems. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2011;15(12):3701–3713. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gehlsen MD, Bates FS. Conformational Asymmetry in Poly (Vinylcyclohexane) Containing Diblock Copolymers. Macromolecules. 1994;27(13):3611–3618. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bates FS, Schulz MF, Khandpur AK, Förster S, Rosedale JH, Almdal K, Mortensen K. Fluctuations, Conformational Asymmetry and Block Copolymer Phase Behaviour. Faraday Discuss. 1994;98:7–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Segal-Peretz T, Ren J, Xiong S, Khaira G, Bowen A, Ocola LE, Divan R, Doxastakis M, Ferrier NJ, de Pablo J, Nealey PF. Quantitative Three-Dimensional Characterization of Block Copolymer Directed Self-Assembly on Combined Chemical and Topographical Prepatterned Templates. ACS Nano. 2017;11:1307. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b05657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Khaira G, Doxastakis M, Bowen A, Ren J, Suh HS, Segal-Peretz T, Chen X, Zhou C, Hannon AF, Ferrier NJ, Vishwanath V, Sunday DF, Gronheid R, Kline RJ, de Pablo JJ, Nealey PF. Derivation of Multiple Covarying Material and Process Parameters Using Physics-Based Modeling of X-Ray Data. Macromolecules. 2017;50(19):7783–7793. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp1

RESOURCES