Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-017-08421-z, published online 15 August 2017
This Article contains errors in the Reference list. Reference 19 is incorrectly listed as ‘Nolte, G. et al. Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clinical Neurophysiology 115, 2292–2307 (2004)’. The correct reference 19 appears below as ref.1.
Additionally, reference 45 is incorrectly cited in its second instance. The correct reference 45 appears below as ref.2.
Consequently, in the Discussion section,
‘The recently reported decomposition of MEG activity by Independent Component Analysis in the cortical source space revealed occipitо-parietal 10 Hz components in all the subjects, and temporal 8–10 Hz components in some of them45’.
should read:
‘The recently reported decomposition of MEG activity by Independent Component Analysis in the cortical source space revealed occipitо-parietal 10 Hz components in all the subjects, and temporal 8–10 Hz components in some of them2’.
Footnotes
The original article can be found online at 10.1038/s41598-017-08421-z.
References
- 1.Lodder, S. S. & van Putten, M. J. Automated EEG analysis: Characterizing the posterior dominant rhythm. Journal of neuroscience methods200, 86–93 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 2.Ramkumar, P., Parkkonen, L., Hari, R. & Hyvärinen, A. Characterization of neuromagnetic brain rhythms over time scales of minutes using spatial independent component analysis. Human brain mapping33, 1648–1662 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]