Skip to main content
Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences logoLink to Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences
. 2018 Apr 16;376(2120):20180105. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2018.0105

The promises of gravitational-wave astronomy

Iain W Martin 1,, Nils Andersson 1, Jim Hough 1, Carole Mundell 1
PMCID: PMC5915653  PMID: 29661982

In 2015, the first direct detection of gravitational waves was made by the Advanced LIGO detectors [1]. The signal observed originated from a binary black hole system, approximately 410 Mpc away from the Earth, in which two black holes of 36 and 29 solar masses spiralled into each other and merged to form a single black hole of 62 solar masses, radiating about three solar masses of energy as gravitational waves. This detection was recognized by the award of the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics.

Following the first detection, four more black hole mergers have been observed [24]. In addition, a binary neutron star inspiral has been observed [5]: this event has been associated with a gamma ray burst detected 1.7 s after the gravitational-wave event occurred [68]. Follow-up electromagnetic observations have identified a counterpart source close to the galaxy NGC 4993 which is consistent with the position and distance obtained from the gravitational-wave data [911]. An extraordinary amount of analysis has been carried out based on these detections, including a new measurement of the Hubble constant [12] based on the neutron star inspiral, while the black hole observations have confirmed the existence of stellar black holes in a mass range never before observed. These are just some examples of the power and promise of gravitational-wave astronomy.

The ability to directly detect gravitational waves is the result of several decades of experimental work. Efforts began in the 1960s with the construction of detectors consisting of large aluminium bars. The passage of a gravitational wave was expected excite the fundamental resonant mode of the bar, which would be measured by piezo-electric sensors. This technique is only sensitive at frequencies around the fundamental resonant frequencies of the bars, and to obtain high sensitivity over a broader frequency band interferometric detectors were developed.

These detectors are based on the Michelson interferometer, and monitor the relative separation of mirrors located at the end of kilometre-scale perpendicular arms. Incoming laser light is directed along each arm by a beam-splitter, and reflected from mirrors at the end of the arms. The reflected light recombines at the beam-splitter, creating an interference pattern at the output of the interferometer. Any changes in the position of the mirrors will produce a change in the interference pattern at the output of the detector. The change in arm-length produced by a gravitational wave is very small. In the case of the first detection, the peak change in length measured was 4 × 10−18 m. Reaching the sensitivity required to detect these very small length changes is a huge technical challenge. A wide variety of noise sources must be overcome, including quantum noise associated with the laser light, seismic noise from the motion of the Earth coupling into the detector and thermal noise associated with thermally induced vibrations of the interferometer mirrors.

While gravitational waves were not directly detected until 2015, there was very strong indirect evidence of their existence from measurements of the binary pulsar PSR B1913 + 16, which showed that it was losing energy at a rate consistent with the emission of gravitational waves [13,14].

The initial detections were made by the two Advanced LIGO detectors (located at Hanford, WA, and Livingston, LA, in the USA) [15]. In August 2017, Advanced Virgo [16] (located close to Pisa in Italy) joined Advanced LIGO in an observing run, with a black hole inspiral being observed in all three instruments and a binary neutron star system being observed by both LIGO detectors while being in a null direction for the Virgo detector [4,5]. Observations from several detectors at different locations allow more precise localization of the source and there are plans for a worldwide network of detectors including a third Advanced LIGO detector in India and an underground, cryogenic detector called KAGRA, which is under construction in the Kamioka mine in Japan.

This issue explores a number of aspects of gravitational-wave astronomy. Schutz [17] gives an overview of the current status of the field with details of the first detections of gravitational waves and the new gravitational-wave science which will be possible in the future. One important aspect discussed here is the potential of planned space-based detectors to allow observations of much lower frequency sources that can be observed by the ground-based interferometers. More details of the proposed LISA (Laser Interferometer Space Antenna) mission can be found in https://www.elisascience.org/files/publications/LISA_L3_20170120.pdf [18].

To reach the required sensitivities for planned future detectors significant research and development of detector technologies will be required, and a number of these are discussed in the next four articles. Thermal noise associated with the highly reflective coatings applied to the interferometer mirrors will limit the performance of current detectors at their most sensitive frequencies. Research into novel coatings to overcome this limit is discussed by Steinlechner [19]. Quantum mechanics sets another fundamental limit to detector sensitivity: however, techniques exist for surpassing the ‘standard quantum limit’, as discussed by Heurs [20]. One of the key contributions from the UK to the aLIGO detectors was the fused silica fibres used to suspend the detector mirrors. This contribution, and the development of enhanced suspensions to enable the construction of future detectors, is discussed by van Veggel [21].

Gravitational-wave detectors are some of the most sophisticated instruments ever constructed, and a wide variety of instrumental and environmental noise sources can affect data quality. An overview of how such transient noise sources can be identified, and their effect on data quality minimized, is given by Nutall [22].

We now move on to consider more details of the science which can be carried out from gravitational-wave detections. Ho [23] explores the astrophysics of neutron stars and the ways in which observations of gravitational waves from neutron stars will advance our understanding of these exotic systems. O'Brien & Evans [24] discuss gravitational-wave emissions associated with gamma ray bursts, the most luminous sources of high-energy radiation, and describes the methods used to search for electromagnetic counterparts to such gravitational- wave events.

In addition to the ground-based gravitational-wave detectors, another parallel effort to detect gravitational-wave sources is based on accurately timing the signals from pulsars, searching for small variations caused by gravitational waves. This method was described by Stappers et al. [25].

The complex challenge of developing technology and experimental techniques to enable the detection of gravitational waves has led to many applications and spin-offs in other fields. Two examples are given in articles here. Robertson et al. [26] focus on a spin-off project in which stem cell differentiation is controlled by the application of nanoscale vibrations to the cells. This has potential applications in the growth of bone tissue. Middlemiss et al. [27] discuss the development of novel microelectromechanical system gravimeters. These small and portable devices can sensitively measure small changes in the local gravitational acceleration, with much potential application associated with mapping subterranean density including mineral exploration, archaeology, volcanology and defence.

This is a very exciting time in gravitational astronomy. After decades of challenging work, the first gravitational-wave observations of a black hole and neutron star inspirals have been made, providing a wealth of exciting and some unexpected results. As the sensitivity of detectors improves and the number of sources detected increases, the future promises to be even more exciting, as we enter the epoch of multi-messenger astronomy.

Data accessibility

This article has no additional data.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

We received no funding for this study.

References

  • 1.Abbott BP, et al. 2016. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 688 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abbott BP, et al. 2016. GW151226: observation of gravitational waves from a 22-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 688 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241103) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abbott BP, et al. 2017. GW170104: observation of a 50-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence at redshift 0.2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 70 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.221101) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abbott BP, et al. 2017. GW170814: a three-detector observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole coalescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 1 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.141101) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abbott BP, et al. 2017. GW170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 61 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Goldstein A, et al. 2017. An ordinary short gamma-ray burst with extraordinary implications: Fermi-GBM detection of GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L14 ( 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8f41) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Savchenko V, et al. 2017. INTEGRAL detection of the first prompt gamma-ray signal coincident with the gravitational-wave event GW170817. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L15 ( 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8f94) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Abbott BP, et al. 2017. Gravitational waves and gamma-rays from a binary neutron star merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L13 ( 10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Coulter DA, et al. 2017. Science. ( 10.1126/science.aap9811) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pan YC, et al. 2017. The old host-galaxy environment of SSS17a, the first electromagnetic counterpart to a gravitational-wave source. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L30 ( 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9116) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Abbott BP, et al. 2017. Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L12 ( 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration. 2017. A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant. Nature 551, 85–88. ( 10.1038/nature24471) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hulse RA, Taylor JH.. 1975. Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system. Astrophys. J. 195, L51–L53. ( 10.1086/181708) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Taylor JH, Weisberg JM. 1982. A new test of general relativity—gravitational radiation and the binary pulsar PSR 1913+16. Astrophys. J. 253, 908 ( 10.1086/159690) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Abbott BP, et al. 2016. GW150914: the advanced LIGO detectors in the era of first discoveries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 432 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.131103) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Acernese F, et al. 2015. Advanced virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector. Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 024001 ( 10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schutz BF. 2018. Gravitational-wave astronomy: delivering on the promises. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170279 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0279) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Armano M, et al. 2018. Beyond the required LISA free-fall performance: new LISA pathfinder results down to 20 µHz. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 061101 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.061101) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Steinlechner J. 2018. Development of mirror coatings for gravitational-wave detectors. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170282 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0282) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Heurs M. 2018. Gravitational wave detection using laser interferometry beyond the standard quantum limit. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170289 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0289) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.van Veggel A-MA. (on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration). 2018. Quasi-monolithic mirror suspensions in ground-based gravitational-wave detectors: an overview and look to the future. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170281 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0281) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nuttall LK. 2018. Characterizing transient noise in the LIGO detectors. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170286 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0286) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ho WCG. 2018. Gravitational waves from neutron stars and asteroseismology. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170285 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0285) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.O'Brien PT, Evans P. 2018. High-energy astrophysics and the search for sources of gravitational waves. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170294 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0294) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stappers BW, Keane EF, Kramer M, Possenti A, Stairs IH. 2018. The prospects of pulsar timing with new-generation radio telescopes and the Square Kilometre Array. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170293 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0293) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Robertson SN, et al. 2018. Control of cell behaviour through nanovibrational stimulation: nanokicking. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170290 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0290) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Middlemiss RP, Bramsiepe SG, Douglas R, Hild S, Hough J, Paul DJ, Samarelli A, Rowan S, Hammond GD. 2018. Microelectromechanical system gravimeters as a new tool for gravity imaging. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20170291 ( 10.1098/rsta.2017.0291) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This article has no additional data.


Articles from Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES