Skip to main content
JCI Insight logoLink to JCI Insight
. 2018 Feb 22;3(4):e92193. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.92193

Von Hippel-Lindau mutations disrupt vascular patterning and maturation via Notch

Alexandra Arreola 1, Laura Beth Payne 2, Morgan H Julian 2,3, Aguirre A de Cubas 4, Anthony B Daniels 5,6,7,8, Sarah Taylor 2, Huaning Zhao 2,9, Jordan Darden 2,10, Victoria L Bautch 1,11,12, W Kimryn Rathmell 4,6,8,, John C Chappell 2,3,9,10
PMCID: PMC5916240  PMID: 29467323

Abstract

Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene mutations induce neural tissue hemangioblastomas, as well as highly vascularized clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCCs). Pathological vessel remodeling arises from misregulation of HIFs and VEGF, among other genes. Variation in disease penetrance has long been recognized in relation to genotype. We show Vhl mutations also disrupt Notch signaling, causing mutation-specific vascular abnormalities, e.g., type 1 (null) vs. type 2B (murine G518A representing human R167Q). In conditional mutation retina vasculature, Vhl-null mutation (i.e., UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl) had little effect on initial vessel branching, but it severely reduced arterial and venous branching at later stages. Interestingly, this mutation accelerated arterial maturation, as observed in retina vessel morphology and aberrant α-smooth muscle actin localization, particularly in vascular pericytes. RNA sequencing analysis identified gene expression changes within several key pathways, including Notch and smooth muscle cell contractility. Notch inhibition failed to reverse later-stage branching defects but rescued the accelerated arterialization. Retinal vessels harboring the type 2B Vhl mutation (i.e., UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B) displayed stage-specific changes in vessel branching and an advanced progression toward an arterial phenotype. Disrupting Notch signaling in type 2B mutants increased both artery and vein branching and restored arterial maturation toward nonmutant levels. By revealing differential effects of the null and type 2B Vhl mutations on vessel branching and maturation, these data may provide insight into the variability of VHL-associated vascular changes — particularly the heterogeneity and aggressiveness in ccRCC vessel growth — and also suggest Notch pathway targets for treating VHL syndrome.

Keywords: Oncology, Vascular Biology

Keywords: Oncogenes, Pericytes, endothelial cells


VHL gene mutations compromise Notch signaling and accelerate blood vessel maturation toward an arterial phenotype, while differentially disrupting vessel branching architecture.

Introduction

Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome is an autosomal dominant inherited predisposition to the onset of cancer in neurological tissues, as well as in the kidney, adrenal gland, pancreas, and liver (1). Genetic lesions that compromise the normal VHL protein (pVHL) function can give rise to different types of carcinomas, such as clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) (2). In addition to elevated risk for ccRCC, 60%–80% of patients with VHL syndrome, including those with type 2B missense VHL mutations, will develop hemangioblastomas (35). These benign neoplasms are composed of proliferating endothelial and stromal cells that arise in the brain and brain stem, as well as the spinal cord and retina, and often result in catastrophic effects for patients due to their site of presentation (6). Among other functions, the ubiquitin E3 ligase substrate recognition activity of pVHL provides essential modulation of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), which orchestrate transcription of downstream gene targets in proportion to tissue oxygen levels. The VHL type 2B mutation R167Q has been described as a loss of pVHL interaction with Elongin C but retention of partial regulation of HIF-1α and HIF-2α levels, which may help explain the observed clinical spectrum (7). Numerous HIF-1α targets are key regulators of blood vessel growth and remodeling, the most potent of which is VEGF-A (8).

Endothelial cells respond to VEGF-A through the receptor tyrosine kinase Flk-1/VEGF Receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), which promotes endothelial cell proliferation and sprouting migration (9). The Notch pathway intersects with VEGF-A signaling to coordinate endothelial cell behaviors such that endothelial “tip” cells emigrate outward from parent blood vessels, while “stalk” cells largely divide to promote vessel elongation (10, 11). Genetic loss of delta-like 4 (Dll4) or pharmacological blockade of Notch1 receptor signaling, such as through N-[N-(3,5-Difluorophenacetyl)-L-alanyl]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester (DAPT) treatment, leads to a hypersprouting phenotype and the formation of excessive vessel branches (10, 12), though this nascent vasculature is not always functional (13, 14). Endothelial cells also express the Notch ligand Jagged1 (Jag1), an antagonist of Dll4 that competes for binding of Notch1 and thus modulates tip cell formation and vascular network complexity (15). Notch signaling also specifies arterial-venous identity of endothelial cells (16), providing key signals for vessel maturation and mural cell development (1719). For instance, endothelial Jag1 induces mural cell expression of vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC) proteins such as α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) via binding of the Notch3 receptor (20, 21). These, and numerous other studies, therefore support a model in which elevated Notch signaling restricts overall branching complexity of a developing network while promoting vessel maturation and arterialization (22); thus, Notch blockade can increase vessel branching and limit processes involved in maturation, such as the acquisition of functional vascular SMCs (19, 21). The effect of Notch blockade in the setting of variable levels of pathogenic pathway activation, however, is unknown.

Aberrant Notch signaling has been implicated in pathological conditions associated with VHL syndrome, most notably in the onset and progression of ccRCC (23, 24). While VHL mutations are known to disrupt the HIF/VEGF-A signaling axis and lead to abnormal vascular remodeling (25), the intersection with the Notch pathway, particularly in the vascular compartment, remains to be fully elucidated in the VHL mutation background. Recent studies suggest solid tumors frequently acquire a resistance to antiangiogenic, and specifically anti-VEGF, therapies (26, 27); therefore, a more complete understanding of Notch signaling in the setting of VHL loss or mutation is critical for developing alternative therapeutic targets within the Notch pathway for treating ccRCC and VHL-related conditions such as hemangioblastoma.

In the current study, we explored blood vessel development in the context of conditional biallelic Vhl loss (i.e., UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl), as well as in the setting of a specialized model of type 2B Vhl–knock-in mutation, rendered monoallelic by conditional deletion of a WT copy of Vhl (i.e., UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B), mimicking the loss of heterozygosity that takes place in human VHL disease (referred to as VHL type 2B mutant). Embryonic stem cell–derived (ES cell–derived) blood vessels harboring the type 2B G518A missense mutation in Vhl (equivalent to the arginine 167 to alutamine [R167Q] in humans) displayed a more severe vascular dysmorphogenesis than the Vhl–/– vasculature. Endothelial cells isolated from both genotypic backgrounds, however, exhibited transcriptional alterations in VEGF-A and Notch pathway genes. In vivo analysis of the early stages of mouse retinal vessel development P5 revealed branching morphology defects in the setting of a Vhl type 2B mutation (i.e., UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B) but only subtle changes in vessels of conditionally deleted Vhl-null mice (i.e., UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl). At slightly later stages of retinal development (P7), we found that genetic loss of Vhl (i.e., UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl) caused an aberrant increase in arterial maturation (e.g., premature elevation of pericyte αSMA expression) at the expense of expanding capillary density. Vhl type 2B mutation carriers induced to lose the WT copy of Vhl (i.e., UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B), however, exhibited this accelerated arterial formation without a concomitant decrease in retinal microvessels. Pharmacological inhibition of Notch signaling rescued the aberrant arterial maturation phenotype while causing significant increases in vessel branching. Applying RNA Sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis to these VHL mutants, we found distinct changes in gene expression patterns of key signaling networks, including the Notch, HIF, SMC contraction, and FoxO/TGFβ pathways. Toward the completion of retinal development at P21, conditionally Vhl-null and type 2B mutant (i.e., UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B, respectively) vasculature displayed severe morphological defects, reflecting misregulation within the Notch pathway that integrates with and compounds defects in these other critical signaling cascades. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the type 2B VHL mutation may influence vascular changes and hemangioblastoma formation by accelerating the maturation of larger-caliber arteries in addition to maintaining and expanding capillary density, which could, in turn, worsen pathological progression via blood perfusion defects.

Results

Type 2B Vhl mutation disrupts VEGF and Notch signaling and causes blood vessel-branching defects.

The VHL complex provides essential regulation of HIFs, which in turn modulate expression of a number of downstream proangiogenic target genes, including VEGF-A. Because Notch signaling intersects with the VEGF-A pathway (10, 11), we hypothesized that complete genetic loss of Vhl (Vhl–/–) and the type 2B Vhl mutation cause vessel overgrowth through downstream disruptions in both the VEGF-A and Notch pathways. Endothelial cells that arise during mouse ES cell differentiation undergo angiogenic sprouting and form lumenized blood vessels, akin to vascular development in vivo (28, 29). We analyzed WT ES cell–derived vascular networks for their overall branching complexity and compared them with vessels formed in the Vhl-null (Vhl–/–) and –type 2B mutant backgrounds (Supplemental Figure 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.92193DS1). Interestingly, Vhl–/– vessels did not exhibit any significant changes in overall vessel branching. In contrast, type 2B mutant (i.e., Vhl2B/2B) vasculature showed a significant increase in branching complexity, suggesting that the type 2B mutation has distinct effects on the molecular mechanisms governing blood vessel branching.

To further test our hypothesis regarding VEGF-A and Notch pathway disruptions downstream of genetic Vhl mutations, we analyzed the transcriptional profile of WT, Vhl–/–, and Vhl2B/2B endothelial cells by assessing candidate targets within these pathways. We enzymatically dissociated ES cell cultures from each genetic background and used magnetic bead–assisted cell sorting (i.e., via platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 [PECAM-1]/CD31 labeling) to enrich for endothelial cells. We assessed mRNA levels by quantitative PCR (qPCR) specifically evaluating VEGF-A and VEGFR2/Flk-1 levels, as well as the Notch pathway components Dll4, Jag1, Notch3, and Hey2 (Supplemental Figure 1). Although VEGFR2/Flk-1 mRNA levels were significantly higher in both Vhl mutant backgrounds, only the type 2B Vhl mutant endothelial cells harbored a significant increase in VEGF-A transcript levels. Interestingly, Dll4 mRNA levels were significantly lower in Vhl–/– endothelial cells, as compared with WT, while these transcripts were significantly elevated in the type 2B mutants. Endothelial Notch3 expression was significantly higher in both backgrounds, and Jag1 expression was raised in both but showed a significant increase only in the Vhl–/– context. The Notch pathway transcription factor Hey2 was significantly elevated in endothelial cells only expressing type 2B Vhl (i.e., Vhl2B/2B); however, it was unchanged with full genetic loss of Vhl. Taken together, these observations suggest that the Vhl–/– and type 2B Vhl mutations elicit specific effects on endothelial cells, which is reflected in expression of VEGF-A and Notch pathway components, and these distinct signaling environments yield vascular networks with overall unique morphologies.

Conditional Vhl mutations induce abnormal blood vessel development in early-stage postnatal mouse retinas.

In observing differential effects of Vhl–/– and Vhl2B/2B on vascular development, we hypothesized that in vivo blood vessel formation would also exhibit distinct abnormalities due to disruption of the VEGF-A and Notch signaling pathways. To test this hypothesis, we assessed blood vessel formation in the developing retinas of P5 mice harboring (i) tamoxifen-inducible Cre-recombinase activity (i.e., UBCCreER/+) and (ii) loxP sites for creating mutated Vhl alleles via targeted recombination (Vhlfl/fl and Vhlfl/2B; Supplemental Figure 2). After tamoxifen administration from P1–P3, retinas were collected at P5 and immunostained to visualize the developing vascular networks using confocal microscopy. Arterial and venous vasculature in the Vhl type 2B mutant retinas (i.e., UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B) had significant elevations in branching complexity compared with littermate controls (i.e., UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl) (Figure 1). Interestingly, retinal vessels in Vhl heterozygous (UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B) mice exhibited a significant increase in arterial, but not venous, branching. Consistent with the Vhl–/– ES cell–derived vessels, the induced that Vhl-null retinas (i.e., UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl) lacked vessel-branching changes. Furthermore, conditional type 2B mutant vessels (Vhl type 2B mutant; i.e., UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B) were more limited in their expansion across the retinal surface, as were the UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl vasculature, though to a lesser extent. Arterial sprouting in littermate control retinas (i.e., UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl) was significantly (1.5-fold) higher than sprout formation within venous regions; however, this difference was lost with all induced Vhl mutations (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B), suggesting a potential shift from predominant angiogenic sprouting and moderate vessel maturation to a balance between these 2 stages of vessel formation. Overall, these data are consistent with the idea that the branching complexity of developing vessels is severely affected by the type 2B Vhl mutation, such that even in the presence of the WT Vhl gene, we observe disrupted vascular development (Vhlfl/2B heterozygotes), while heterozygous or homozygous deletions of the Vhl gene are less disruptive to normal blood vessel formation.

Figure 1. The Vhl 2B mutation causes increased arterial and venous branching in P5 mouse retinas without changes in vessel expansion or endothelial cell sprouting.

Figure 1

(A–H) Representative images of P5 mouse retinal vasculature stained with isolectin B4. Arterial (A–D) and venous (E–H) regions are shown for UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl, UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B, UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl, and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B littermates exposed to tamoxifen. Scale bar: 100 μm. (I) Arterial branch points per vessel length measured from P5 vascular networks. *P ≤ 0.05 vs. UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl. **P ≤ 0.01 vs. UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl. (J) Venous branch points per vessel length measured from P5 vascular networks. **P ≤ 0.01 vs. UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl. (K) Percent of radial expansion of retinal vessels from the optic disc toward the peripheral edge. No significant differences found. (L) Endothelial sprouting extensions per vessel length of the vascular front for arterial (triangles) and venous (squares) regions. *P ≤ 0.05 vs. UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl arterial. All others are not significantly different. Values are averages ± SEM. n = 10–15 retina images per group (i.e., 2–3 from 5 experimental litters). All statistical comparisons performed using 1-way ANOVA followed by pair-wise comparisons with a 2-tailed Student t test.

Notch inhibition rescues maturation defects in the retinal vasculature of postnatal Vhl mutant mice.

Vessel-branching irregularities observed in the development of conditional Vhl mutant retinas suggested that additional aspects of arterial and venous network formation might also be perturbed. Because Notch signaling is known to be involved in arterial-venous specification and vessel maturation (1618, 20), we hypothesized that later stages of vascular development might also be adversely affected by the induction of genetic Vhl mutations. Therefore, we analyzed the developing retinal vasculature of P7 conditional Vhl mutant mice for branching complexity and hallmarks of arterial maturation, specifically the morphology and spatial distribution of αSMA+ vessels. In addition, we explored the vessel maturation role of Notch signaling downstream of Vhl mutations by pharmacologically blocking the Notch pathway in each of the Vhl mutant backgrounds (P5–P6 i.p. administration of the γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT; Supplemental Figure 2), aiming to observe a potential rescue in branching and arterial maturation defects. Vessel branching within arterial and venous regions was significantly reduced in conditional Vhl-null retinas (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl; Figure 2), comparable with the sparsely branched retinal vasculature of mice with a gain-of-function mutation for Notch signaling (i.e., conditional overexpression of Notch1 intracellular domain [N1ICD], UBCCreER/+RosaN1ICD; Supplemental Figure 3). In contrast, induction of the type 2B Vhl mutation (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B) had little to no effect on branching (Figure 2). Notch inhibition elevated retinal vessel branching within all experimental groups, regardless of association with arterial and venous areas. In spite of these increases, UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl vasculature was not fully rescued back to littermate control branching levels by blocking Notch signaling. These observations again underscore that the type 2B Vhl mutation uniquely affects blood vessel formation, consistent with the previously described data from the ES cell–derived vessels and the P5 retinal vasculature.

Figure 2. Conditional loss of Vhl in P7 mouse retinas yields a reduction in arterial and venous branching, which is partially rescued with Notch inhibition by DAPT.

Figure 2

(A–P) Representative images of P7 mouse retinal vasculature stained with isolectin B4. Arterial (A–H) and venous (I–P) regions are shown for UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl, UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B, UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl, and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B mutant littermates exposed to tamoxifen and subjected to either control treatment (DMSO) or Notch inhibition (DAPT). Scale bars: 100 μm. (Q) Arterial branch points per vessel length measured from control (triangles) and Notch-inhibited (squares) P7 vascular networks. *P ≤ 0.05 vs. control UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B. **P ≤ 0.05 vs. control within the same genotype, and vs. Notch-inhibited UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl. (R) Venous branch points per vessel length measured from control (triangles) and Notch-inhibited (squares) P7 vascular networks. *P ≤ 0.05 vs. control UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl and UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B. **P ≤ 0.05 vs. control within the same genotype, and vs. Notch-inhibited UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl. ***P ≤ 0.05 vs. UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B. Values are averages ± SEM. n = 6–8 retina images per group (i.e., 3–4 from 2 experimental litters). All statistical comparisons performed using 1-way ANOVA followed by pair-wise comparisons with a 2-tailed Student t test.

To compare the influence of the different Vhl mutations on vessel maturation, we assessed P7 retinal vasculature for the morphology and spatial distribution of αSMA+ vessels. Specifically, we measured (i) the percent length of primary arterial vessels covered with cells expressing αSMA, (ii) the diameter of these primary retinal arteries/arterioles, and (iii) the relative amount of αSMA expression aberrantly occurring beyond the primary retinal arteries (i.e., within the capillary plexus region at the vascular front) (Figure 3). In contrast to vessel-branching changes, arterial morphologies were perturbed in both induced Vhl-null and –type 2B mutations (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B, respectively). Primary arteries within these Vhl mutant retinas displayed αSMA expression extending further toward the vascular front, and these arteries had significantly larger diameters compared with the littermate control retinas (both UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl and UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B). Strikingly, αSMA expression along microvessels at the periphery of the Vhl-null and –type 2B mutant retinal vasculature exhibited an abnormal spatial distribution. In particular, more perivascular cells at the vascular front expressed a higher level of αSMA than is typically displayed at this developmental time point (21), and this excess of αSMA was not found in nonmutant littermate controls harboring at least 1 WT Vhl allele (i.e., UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl and UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B) (Figure 3). Notch inhibition rescued all of the defects observed in the morphology and spatial distribution of αSMA+ vessels of P7 retinal vasculature. Taken together, these results, which are summarized in Supplemental Figure 4, suggest that Notch signaling makes critical contributions to developmental maturation of arterial vessels in the setting of Vhl deficiency.

Figure 3. In P7 mouse retina, conditional Vhl-null and –type 2B mutations accelerate vessel maturation via excess alpha-smooth muscle actin expression, and this defect can be rescued by blocking Notch signaling.

Figure 3

(A–H) Representative images of P7 mouse retinal vasculature stained with isolectin B4 (top rows) and αSMA (middle rows). A quarter region, or leaflet, is shown for UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl, UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B, UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl, and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B littermate retinas exposed to tamoxifen and subjected to either control treatment (DMSO, A–D) or Notch inhibition (DAPT, E–H). Scale bars: 200 μm. (I) Percent length of primary artery covered by αSMA+ cells in control (triangles) and Notch-inhibited (squares) P7 vascular networks. *P ≤ 0.05 vs. control UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl and UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B, and vs. Notch-inhibited within same genotype. (J) Diameter of primary retinal artery measured from control (triangles) and Notch-inhibited (squares) P7 vascular networks. *P ≤ 0.05 vs. control UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl and UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B, and vs. Notch-inhibited within same genotype. (K) Percent mislocalization of αSMA expression not associated with primary retinal arteries in control (triangles) and Notch-inhibited (squares) retinas. *P ≤ 0.05 vs. control UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl and UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B, and vs. Notch-inhibited within same genotype. **P ≤ 0.05 vs. control UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl, and vs. Notch-inhibited UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B. Values are averages ± SEM. n = 6–8 retina images per group (i.e., 3–4 from 2 experimental litters). All statistical comparisons performed using 1-way ANOVA followed by pair-wise comparisons with a 2-tailed Student t test.

Vascular pericytes have been suggested to regulate angiogenic remodeling at the retinal vascular front, specifically by influencing endothelial cell interactions via Notch signaling (30). In addition, recent studies have suggested that coronary SMCs can arise during development from pericytes expressing neural glial antigen 2 (NG2) (31). Thus, we asked if the perivascular cells with increased αSMA expression in the conditional Vhl mutant retinas were also positive for NG2, a well-established retinal pericyte marker (32). Indeed, we found a substantial overlap in the αSMA and NG2 signals (Figure 4), suggesting that the genetic loss of the Vhl gene (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl) and, to a greater extent, the type 2B Vhl mutation (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B) accelerates vascular pericyte expression of αSMA that likely yields an increased population of contractile vascular SMCs.

Figure 4. Pericytes at the vascular front of P7 conditional Vhl-null and Vhl type 2B mutant retina vessel networks ectopically express αSMA but not in littermate control vessels.

Figure 4

(A–F, H–M, O–T) Representative images of P7 mouse retinal vasculature stained for isolectin B4 (A, H, O), αSMA (B, I, P), and neural glial antigen-2 (NG2) (C, J, Q). The NG2 image is merged with the isolectin B4 image (D, K, R), with the αSMA image (E, L, S), and with both isolectin B4 and αSMA (F, M, T). Arrows indicate NG2+ cells overlapping with αSMA signal. The dotted lines in E, L, and S indicate the region of interest where pixel intensity values were measured and normalized. Scale bars: 50 μm. (G, N, U) Pixel intensity values for each line scan of NG2 and αSMA signals in the region indicated by the dotted line drawn in E, L, and S, respectively.

Notch signaling is among several vascular morphogenesis pathways disrupted by inducing Vhl loss or type 2B mutation.

The pVHL regulates HIF activity, which in turn modulates numerous downstream vascular morphogenesis cues including VEGF-A and PDGF, among several others (8). While our data support Notch signaling as an additional downstream effector of pVHL activity, we hypothesized that the Vhl-null and –type 2B mutation scenarios (i.e., UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B, respectively) likely elicit critical changes in gene expression within other vascular morphogenesis pathways, in addition to Notch. To test this idea, we performed transcriptome analysis of whole retinas from P7 conditional Vhl-null and –type 2B mutation mice (and control littermates). RNA-Seq data (uploaded to NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus; GEO) was mapped to the mouse reference genome, and we conducted pathway analysis using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) (33, 34). In addition to significant changes in the expression of Hey2, an important transcriptional target in the Notch pathway (Figure 5), we found disrupted transcription of components within other pathways as well. Among several effectors altered within the HIF pathway, Egl-9 Family Hypoxia Inducible Factor 3 (Egln3) was upregulated in the null (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl) and type 2B (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B) retinas, consistent with VHL/HIF signaling dynamics in hypoxia (35). Also significantly elevated was the expression of genes involved in vascular smooth muscle contraction, such as for rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 12 (Arhgef12), which contributes to myosin regulation in SMCs (36). Transcriptional regulation within the FoxO/TGFβ signaling axis was also severely affected, as seen in reduced expression of Gadd45b. This protein induces growth arrest and can limit downstream TGFβ signaling (37); thus, reduced Gadd45b expression in the Vhl-null and –type 2B backgrounds suggests a lack of cell growth arrest and a permissive environment for TGFβ signaling, which is known to promote SMC differentiation (38, 39). These transcriptional changes, alongside our observation of accelerated arterialization of the retinal vasculature in Vhl-null and –type 2B conditional mutants (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B), lend further support to the idea that these Vhl mutations contribute to vascular defects encompassing misregulation of angiogenic remodeling, as well as of vessel maturation.

Figure 5. RNA-Seq analysis of P7 conditional Vhl-null and Vhl–2B mutant retinas identifies expression changes in the Notch, hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), smooth muscle contraction, and FoxO/TGFβ pathways, among others.

Figure 5

(A) Heatmap of the 200 most differentially regulated genes for each of the 4 groups: UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl (green), UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B (red), UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl (blue), and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B (orange). Color key indicates relative levels of gene expression changes, with darker blue indicating downregulation and darker red indicating upregulation. (B–E) Box plots for representative genes within each pathway with substantial changes: (B) Hey2 (Notch), (C) Egln3 (HIF), (D) Arhgef12 (smooth muscle contraction), and (E) Gadd45b (FoxO/TGFβ).

Retinal blood vessel defects in Vhl-null and –type 2B mutant mice worsen by P21.

To determine if the vascular defects in the Vhl genetic loss and –type 2B mutation mice (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B) persisted beyond early postnatal stages, we collected retinas from P21 mice (weaning) following the induction of these mutations from P1–P3. We found gross vascular dysmorphogenesis in the Vhl-null and –type 2B mutant retinas, including vessel patterning defects and extensive mis-localization of αSMA along retinal arteries and veins (Figure 6). Type 2B mutant vasculature (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B) appeared most severely affected, as these retinal vessels were more randomly distributed and exhibited aberrant αSMA expression along smaller diameter arterioles and arterial branches that connected directly to venules. While our conditional Vhl loss and –type 2B mutation models do not replicate the full extent of the clinical situation, the vessel-branching and maturation phenotypes from the mouse data overlap with certain aspects of VHL-related retinopathy in patients (our unpublished data), warranting further investigation into how these vascular defects may give rise to clinical features of VHL-related retinopathy such as retinal capillary hemangiomas, exudative/tractional detachment, and scar tissue formation. Furthermore, they also support a model in which lesions in the VHL gene give rise to distinct vascular pathologies by disrupting vessel patterning mechanisms prior to the development of hemangioblastomas, such as those governed by the Notch pathway as well as those identified from our transcriptome analysis.

Figure 6. Conditional Vhl-null and –type 2B mutations induce gross vascular dysmorphogenesis and severe mislocalization of αSMA in P21 mouse retinas.

Figure 6

(A–D) Representative images of P21 mouse retinal vasculature stained with isolectin B4 (top row) and αSMA (middle row). An artery-vein pair is shown for UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl (A), UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B (B), UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl (C), and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B (D) littermate retinas exposed to tamoxifen. Scale bars: 100 μm.

Discussion

VHL mutations cause defective blood vessel formation, as is often seen in the clinical presentation of hemangioblastomas within neural tissue of affected patients. In the present study, we show that conditional genetic loss of Vhl (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl) and the type 2B Vhl mutation (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B) have differential effects on vascular development via downstream perturbations in Notch pathway signaling and in conjunction with other pathway misregulation. Endothelial Notch signaling plays a critical role in sprouting angiogenesis (1012), in vessel maturation through arterial-venous specification (16), and in the induction of contractile vascular SMC differentiation (17, 18, 20, 21). Our observations suggest Vhl lesions disrupt Notch signaling such that processes underlying vessel maturation are accelerated; most prominent among these is an altered spatiotemporal expression of αSMA. The early stages of vessel formation and branching are compromised during Vhl loss (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl) but not with the type 2B Vhl mutation (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B). These data suggest that Vhl mutations may not only cause substantial changes in angiogenic branching dynamics, but also strongly influence how blood vessels mature.

The pVHL provides essential regulation of HIFs, which in turn modulate downstream signals that promote vessel growth and remodeling such as VEGF-A. Kurihara et al. explored the VHL/HIF/VEGF signaling axis in postnatal retinas of mice with conditional Vhl loss (25). To induce cre/ERT2 expression in the retina, the authors used the Pax6 promoter, which is present in retina neural progenitor cells but may also be expressed by endothelial cells during early neural tissue development (40). Interestingly, they found that conditional Vhl-KO induced ectopic VEGF-A expression, but retinal blood vessel branching actually decreased, as was observed in the present study. Kurihara and colleagues found that diminished vascular branching resulted largely from vessel regression, which likely represents the vessel pruning phase of retina vascular maturation (41). In contrast, the conditional type 2B Vhl mutation generated in the current study (i.e., UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B) did not cause a decrease in network complexity, and arterial branching was in fact enhanced significantly at P5. These results suggest that, while both Vhl genetic defects disrupt the vessel maturation phase, the type 2B mutation has differential effects on the initial stages of vascular development compared with the null mutation. This disruption of both the early and later stages of vessel formation may contribute to more extensive, and perhaps aggressive, blood vessel remodeling defects in patients carrying the type 2B mutation. Collectively, these data suggest that carriers of type 2B mutations may already have or display some of these vascular defects and should be monitored closely, even in the absence of a “second-hit.”

Misregulation of the Notch signaling pathway has been implicated as a key factor in VHL syndrome manifestations and, most notably, in ccRCC onset and progression. Recent studies have shown an upregulation of the Notch1 receptor in human ccRCC, as well as increased levels of the cleaved intracellular region of Notch1 responsible for downstream signaling (23). Expression of the Notch ligand Jag1 is also highly upregulated in human ccRCC cells (24). While these changes in the Notch pathway have been implicated as contributing factors to renal cell transformation and ccRCC pathogenesis, disruptions in Notch signaling within vascular tissue may also influence disease progression by exacerbating pathological blood vessel remodeling. Our observations suggest that Vhl mutations likely influence vascular patterning in a way that undermines the Notch pathway, among several other effector pathways, such that blood vessel maturation is accelerated toward an arterial phenotype. With the formation of larger-caliber vessels, which presumably enhance blood flow to downstream tissues, it is intriguing to speculate that these changes may be an important factor in the aggressive growth and metastatic potential of ccRCC tumors (42). Thus, targeting the Notch pathway may rescue oncogenic defects, such as cell cycle misregulation (24), while also limiting tumor growth and metastasis by restricting the expansion of tumor-associated arterial vessels.

In the developing retina, vascular pericytes ensheath newly formed blood vessels to promote their stability and integrity. Pericytes can also give rise to arterial SMCs via Jag1/Notch3 signaling, as shown recently in the developing coronary arteries (31). The contractile capacity of capillary pericytes remains an open question (43, 44); however, in the current study, we found ectopic αSMA expression within NG2+ pericytes at the periphery of the vasculature within conditional Vhl-null and –type 2B mutants (i.e., UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl and UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B, respectively). Mural cells at the vascular front of littermate control retinas (i.e., UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl and UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B) lacked αSMA expression at this time point. This aberrant expression of αSMA in Vhl mutant animals suggests an accelerated maturation of retinal pericytes, presumably into precursors for SMCs. The differential effects of Vhl-null and –type 2B mutant Vhl retinal models are particularly interesting in light of the broad range of phenotype in patients with VHL syndrome with regard to retinal involvement and disease severity. Notch inhibition via DAPT treatment rescued this phenotypic abnormality, consistent with the notion that the Vhl mutations augment Notch pathway signals underlying SMC differentiation (17, 18, 20, 21). Notch signaling perturbations likely compound, and potentially intersect with, other cues downstream of pVHL activity, such as PDGF-BB (45) and TGFβ (39), both of which are known to promote SMC differentiation. Future work will be needed to extend the pathway analysis from the conditional Vhl-null and –type 2B mutant transcriptional profiles to elucidate the crosstalk between the Notch pathway and other signaling axes involved in the observed vascular dysmorphogenesis. Nevertheless, our results therefore implicate the Notch pathway as a potential therapeutic target for treating not only early-stage vascular malformations in patients with VHL syndrome, but also those defects affecting blood vessel maturation.

Deletion and type 2B VHL mutations underlie an increased risk for hemangioblastoma and ccRCC formation, owing in part to altered HIF expression (1) as well as defects in numerous other downstream pathways. While both VHL mutations cause abnormal, and often excessive, blood vessel remodeling in the clinical setting, our data suggest that these genetic lesions likely have differential effects on the nature of these vascular changes. Vhl-null mutation (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl) led mostly to accelerated vessel maturation, while the type 2B Vhl mutation (UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B) caused an additional increase in vessel-branching complexity. The previously described partial regulation of HIFs by the mutant 2B Vhl (7) likely gives rise to a unique VHL/HIF downstream gene target axes affecting the aberrant vascular formation observed in type 2B mutants not commensurate in the Vhl-null setting. These results also may help explain the heterogeneity observed in the vascular architecture and integrity within ccRCC tumors (46), as well as the apparent discrepancy between levels of angiogenic factors, tumor vessel content, and tumor growth (28). This disconnect between proangiogenic signals and vessel outcomes has been linked to disruptions in the Notch pathway (14, 47). Our data also strongly implicate compromised Notch signaling downstream of Vhl mutations as a prominent molecular effector for the vascular dysmorphogenesis observed. Thus, developing therapeutic targets within the Notch pathway could offer novel treatment options for patients with VHL syndrome, especially those suffering from recurrent hemangioblastoma formation and ccRCC.

Methods

Mutant mice and inducible genetic recombination experiments.

Mice expressing Cre-recombinase ubiquitously (Tg[UBC-cre/ERT2], The Jackson Laboratory, catalog 007001; denoted in the current study as UBCCreER/+, with CreER animals denoted as UBC+/+) were bred with Vhlfl/fl mice (gift from Volker Haase, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; ref. 48). Vhl2B/+ mice generated previously (4) were also crossed with Vhlfl/fl mice to yield Vhlfl/2B offspring. Breeding UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl males with Vhlfl/2B females produced experimental litters with genotypes: (i) nonmutant littermate control, UBC+/+Vhlfl/fl; (ii) littermate control with 1 WT Vhl allele and one type 2B mutant Vhl allele, UBC+/+Vhlfl/2B; (iii) conditional Vhl-null, UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/fl; and (iv) conditional Vhl type 2B mutant, UBCCreER/+Vhlfl/2B. Where possible, animals were distributed across sex to avoid the introduction of sex biasing. Pups were i.p. injected each day with 1 mg/ml of tamoxifen (Thermo Fisher Scientific) from P1–P3. Retinal harvest occurred on P5, P7, and P21 (Supplemental Figure 2). Cre-recombination activity following tamoxifen exposure was verified using a Cre reporter mouse line (Supplemental Figure 5). For Notch inhibition experiments, DAPT (Calbiochem) was dissolved in DMSO (MilliporeSigma), and 50 mg per kg of animal weight was administered i.p. on P5 and P6, with retina harvest occurring on P7 (Supplemental Figure 2). Equivalent volumes of DMSO-only were injected at the same time points for vehicle control animals.

Retina immunostaining, imaging, and analysis.

Eyes were fixed by whole animal perfusion with 0.5% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Electron Microscopy Services) followed by immersion in 2% PFA for 2 hours at room temperature. Following PBS (VWR) rinse, retinas were dissected from the whole eye, immersed in 100% cold ethanol for 30 minutes, rinsed with PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 (PBS-T; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 minutes at room temperature, and then blocked in 3% donkey serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch) in PBS-T for 1 hour at room temperature. Primary antibody incubation was performed in PBS-T overnight at 4°C with isolectin GS-IB4 conjugated to AlexaFluor 488 (Molecular Probes, I21411, 1:100), αSMA conjugated to Cy3 (clone 1A4, MilliporeSigma, C6198, 1:200), and NG2 (MilliporeSigma, AB5320, 1:200). Secondary antibody incubation was also in PBS-T overnight at 4°C with donkey anti–rabbit AlexaFluor 647 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 711-605-152, 1:400). Retinas were washed for 5 minutes 3 times in PBS-T, flattened, and mounted on slides in 50:50 PBS/glycerol (MP Biomedicals) with 1.5 coverslips. Images of retina whole mounts were acquired with a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope with a ×40 objective, and 10–15 z-axis confocal scans were acquired and compressed. ImageJ was used to measure: (i) vessel-branch point densities, as described in the Supplemental Methods; (ii) the percentage of the retina radial to the optic disc occupied by vasculature (i.e., radial expansion); (iii) the number of vessel sprouts per length of the vascular front; (iv) the percent length of the primary arteries covered by αSMA+ cells; (v) the diameters of primary retinal arteries; (vi) the percent of αSMA+ cells not associated with the primary artery (i.e., mislocalized); and (vii) pixel intensity values across a line region of interest (i.e., line scan tool) (Figure 4).

Retina transcriptome analysis.

Following induction of the genetic mutations as described above, retinas were collected from P7 mice and immediately digested in TRIzol (Invitrogen) to extract mRNA transcripts (n = 2 for each genotype). RNA was further isolated with 1-Bromo-3-chloropropane (MilliporeSigma) and ethanol and purified with an RNeasy Plus Kit (Qiagen). Using an Agilent Bioanlayzer, the Virginia Tech Biocomplexity Institute ensured the isolated mRNA was of a sufficiently high quality for RNA-Seq. Eight samples (4 genotypes × 2 replicates per genotype) were sent to GeneWiz for additional quality assessment, cDNA library generation, and sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq with a 2 × 150 configuration.

Sequencing reads were aligned against the Mouse GENCODE genome, Version M14 (January 2017 freeze, GRCm38, Ensembl 89) using the Spliced Transcripts Alignment to a Reference (STAR) software (49, 50). Reads were preprocessed and index using SAMtools (51). Mapped reads were assigned to gene features and quantified using featureCounts (52). Normalization and differential expression was performed using DESeq2 (53). The top most significantly differentially expressed genes (FDR < 0.01 and log2 difference greater than 0.5 in magnitude) were considered for subsequent functional enrichment using DAVID bioinformatics tools (33, 34). The top 200 most differentially expressed genes were used for unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis and visualized using heatmap representations. Raw data files are available upon request or from NCBI GEO (accession number GSE109102).

Statistics.

Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism 6. Multiple measurements were made for each parameter, and an average and SD were calculated from these values. Statistical comparisons were made using 1-Way ANOVA followed by pair-wise comparisons by 2-tailed Student t test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Study approval.

All animal experiments were conducted with review and approval from the UNC-CH and Virginia Tech IACUC. All protocols are reviewed and approved by IACUC boards. The UNC-CH NIH/PHS Animal Welfare Assurance Number is A3410-01 (expires 4/30/2021). The Virginia Tech NIH/PHS Animal Welfare Assurance Number is A-32081-01 (expires: 7/31/2021).

Author contributions

Research studies were designed by AA, LBP, VLB, WKR, and JCC. AA and JCC conducted experiments, and AA, ST, LBP, MHJ, and JCC acquired the primary data. Data analysis was performed by AA, AADC, HZ, JD, and JCC. AA, VLB, WKR, ABD, and JCC prepared the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank members of the Rathmell, Bautch, and Chappell labs for discussions concerning the data and manuscript preparation. This work was supported by NIH grants R01HL43174 (to VLB), R21CA184387 (to WKR), K99HL105779, and R00HL105779 (both to JCC) and a NIH NRSA grant F31CA154080 (to AA).

Version 1. 02/22/2018

Electronic publication

Funding Statement

Awarded to VL Bautch

Awarded to JC Chappell

Awarded to JC Chappell

Awarded to A Arreola

Awarded to WK Rathmell

Footnotes

AA’s present address is: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine McLendon Clinical Laboratories, UNC Hospital, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Reference information: JCI Insight. 2018;3(4):e92193. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.92193.

Contributor Information

Alexandra Arreola, Email: aarreola@email.unc.edu.

Laura Beth Payne, Email: indigo@vt.edu.

Morgan H. Julian, Email: jmorg94@vtc.vt.edu.

Aguirre A. de Cubas, Email: a.decubas@vanderbilt.edu.

Anthony B. Daniels, Email: anthony.b.daniels@vanderbilt.edu.

Sarah Taylor, Email: tsarah9@vtc.vt.edu.

Huaning Zhao, Email: huaning@vt.edu.

Jordan Darden, Email: jdarden@vt.edu.

Victoria L. Bautch, Email: bautch@med.unc.edu.

W. Kimryn Rathmell, Email: kimryn.rathmell@Vanderbilt.edu.

References

  • 1.Gossage L, Eisen T, Maher ER. VHL, the story of a tumour suppressor gene. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(1):55–64. doi: 10.1038/nrc3844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Keefe SM, Nathanson KL, Rathmell WK. The molecular biology of renal cell carcinoma. Semin Oncol. 2013;40(4):421–428. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Clifford SC, et al. Contrasting effects on HIF-1alpha regulation by disease-causing pVHL mutations correlate with patterns of tumourigenesis in von Hippel-Lindau disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(10):1029–1038. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.10.1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lee CM, et al. VHL Type 2B gene mutation moderates HIF dosage in vitro and in vivo. Oncogene. 2009;28(14):1694–1705. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wind JJ, Lonser RR. Management of von Hippel-Lindau disease-associated CNS lesions. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11(10):1433–1441. doi: 10.1586/ern.11.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kanno H, et al. Spinal cord hemangioblastomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(6):447–452. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hacker KE, Lee CM, Rathmell WK. VHL type 2B mutations retain VBC complex form and function. PLoS One. 2008;3(11):e3801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Patel PH, Chadalavada RS, Chaganti RS, Motzer RJ. Targeting von Hippel-Lindau pathway in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(24):7215–7220. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Olsson AK, Dimberg A, Kreuger J, Claesson-Welsh L. VEGF receptor signalling - in control of vascular function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(5):359–371. doi: 10.1038/nrm1911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hellström M, et al. Dll4 signalling through Notch1 regulates formation of tip cells during angiogenesis. Nature. 2007;445(7129):776–780. doi: 10.1038/nature05571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chappell JC, Mouillesseaux KP, Bautch VL. Flt-1 (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1) is essential for the vascular endothelial growth factor-Notch feedback loop during angiogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(8):1952–1959. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.301805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Suchting S, et al. The Notch ligand Delta-like 4 negatively regulates endothelial tip cell formation and vessel branching. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(9):3225–3230. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611177104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yan M, et al. Chronic DLL4 blockade induces vascular neoplasms. Nature. 2010;463(7282):E6–E7. doi: 10.1038/nature08751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ridgway J, et al. Inhibition of Dll4 signalling inhibits tumour growth by deregulating angiogenesis. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1083–1087. doi: 10.1038/nature05313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Benedito R, et al. The notch ligands Dll4 and Jagged1 have opposing effects on angiogenesis. Cell. 2009;137(6):1124–1135. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hofmann JJ, Iruela-Arispe ML. Notch signaling in blood vessels: who is talking to whom about what? Circ Res. 2007;100(11):1556–1568. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000266408.42939.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.High FA, Lu MM, Pear WS, Loomes KM, Kaestner KH, Epstein JA. Endothelial expression of the Notch ligand Jagged1 is required for vascular smooth muscle development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(6):1955–1959. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709663105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pedrosa AR, et al. Endothelial Jagged1 antagonizes Dll4 regulation of endothelial branching and promotes vascular maturation downstream of Dll4/Notch1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(5):1134–1146. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.304741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lanner F, Sohl M, Farnebo F. Functional arterial and venous fate is determined by graded VEGF signaling and notch status during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27(3):487–493. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000255990.91805.6d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu H, Kennard S, Lilly B. NOTCH3 expression is induced in mural cells through an autoregulatory loop that requires endothelial-expressed JAGGED1. Circ Res. 2009;104(4):466–475. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.184846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Scheppke L, et al. Notch promotes vascular maturation by inducing integrin-mediated smooth muscle cell adhesion to the endothelial basement membrane. Blood. 2012;119(9):2149–2158. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-348706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Phng LK, Gerhardt H. Angiogenesis: a team effort coordinated by notch. Dev Cell. 2009;16(2):196–208. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Johansson E, et al. Simultaneous targeted activation of Notch1 and Vhl-disruption in the kidney proximal epithelial tubular cells in mice. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30739. doi: 10.1038/srep30739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sjölund J, et al. Suppression of renal cell carcinoma growth by inhibition of Notch signaling in vitro and in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(1):217–228. doi: 10.1172/JCI32086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kurihara T, et al. von Hippel-Lindau protein regulates transition from the fetal to the adult circulatory system in retina. Development. 2010;137(9):1563–1571. doi: 10.1242/dev.049015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Heath VL, Bicknell R. Anticancer strategies involving the vasculature. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009;6(7):395–404. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ribatti D. Tumor refractoriness to anti-VEGF therapy. Oncotarget. 2016;7(29):46668–46677. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chappell JC, et al. Flt-1 (VEGFR-1) coordinates discrete stages of blood vessel formation. Cardiovasc Res. 2016;111(1):84–93. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvw091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chappell JC, Taylor SM, Ferrara N, Bautch VL. Local guidance of emerging vessel sprouts requires soluble Flt-1. Dev Cell. 2009;17(3):377–386. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Walpole J, Mac Gabhann F, Peirce SM, Chappell JC. Agent-based computational model of retinal angiogenesis simulates microvascular network morphology as a function of pericyte coverage. Microcirculation. 2017;24(8) doi: 10.1111/micc.12393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Volz KS, et al. Pericytes are progenitors for coronary artery smooth muscle. Elife. 2015;4:e10036. doi: 10.7554/eLife.10036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Armulik A, Genové G, Betsholtz C. Pericytes: developmental, physiological, and pathological perspectives, problems, and promises. Dev Cell. 2011;21(2):193–215. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44–57. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(1):1–13. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.del Peso L, et al. The von Hippel Lindau/hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) pathway regulates the transcription of the HIF-proline hydroxylase genes in response to low oxygen. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(49):48690–48695. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308862200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV. Ca2+ sensitivity of smooth muscle and nonmuscle myosin II: modulated by G proteins, kinases, and myosin phosphatase. Physiol Rev. 2003;83(4):1325–1358. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00023.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Balliet AG, Hollander MC, Fornace AJ, Hoffman B, Liebermann DA. Comparative analysis of the genetic structure and chromosomal mapping of the murine Gadd45g/CR6 gene. DNA Cell Biol. 2003;22(7):457–468. doi: 10.1089/104454903322247334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Owens GK, Kumar MS, Wamhoff BR. Molecular regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in development and disease. Physiol Rev. 2004;84(3):767–801. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ananth S, et al. Transforming growth factor beta1 is a target for the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor and a critical growth factor for clear cell renal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1999;59(9):2210–2216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vasudevan A, Long JE, Crandall JE, Rubenstein JL, Bhide PG. Compartment-specific transcription factors orchestrate angiogenesis gradients in the embryonic brain. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11(4):429–439. doi: 10.1038/nn2074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Korn C, Augustin HG. Mechanisms of Vessel Pruning and Regression. Dev Cell. 2015;34(1):5–17. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sjölund J, et al. The notch and TGF-β signaling pathways contribute to the aggressiveness of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hill RA, Tong L, Yuan P, Murikinati S, Gupta S, Grutzendler J. Regional Blood Flow in the Normal and Ischemic Brain Is Controlled by Arteriolar Smooth Muscle Cell Contractility and Not by Capillary Pericytes. Neuron. 2015;87(1):95–110. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hall CN, et al. Capillary pericytes regulate cerebral blood flow in health and disease. Nature. 2014;508(7494):55–60. doi: 10.1038/nature13165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Iliopoulos O, Levy AP, Jiang C, Kaelin WG, Goldberg MA. Negative regulation of hypoxia-inducible genes by the von Hippel-Lindau protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93(20):10595–10599. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Qian CN, Huang D, Wondergem B, Teh BT. Complexity of tumor vasculature in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2009;115(10 Suppl):2282–2289. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Noguera-Troise I, et al. Blockade of Dll4 inhibits tumour growth by promoting non-productive angiogenesis. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1032–1037. doi: 10.1038/nature05355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Haase VH, Glickman JN, Socolovsky M, Jaenisch R. Vascular tumors in livers with targeted inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(4):1583–1588. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mudge JM, Harrow J. Creating reference gene annotation for the mouse C57BL6/J genome assembly. Mamm Genome. 2015;26(9-10):366–378. doi: 10.1007/s00335-015-9583-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dobin A, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li H, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(7):923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data

Articles from JCI Insight are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES