Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy logoLink to Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
. 2018 Apr 19;12:29. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2018.00029

Neural Progenitors in the Developing Neocortex of the Northern Tree Shrew (Tupaia belangeri) Show a Closer Relationship to Gyrencephalic Primates Than to Lissencephalic Rodents

Sebastian Römer 1, Hannah Bender 1, Wolfgang Knabe 2, Elke Zimmermann 3, Rudolf Rübsamen 4, Johannes Seeger 1, Simone A Fietz 1,*
PMCID: PMC5917011  PMID: 29725291

Abstract

The neocortex is the most complex part of the mammalian brain and as such it has undergone tremendous expansion during evolution, especially in primates. The majority of neocortical neurons originate from distinct neural stem and progenitor cells (NPCs) located in the ventricular and subventricular zone (SVZ). Previous studies revealed that the SVZ thickness as well as the abundance and distribution of NPCs, especially that of basal radial glia (bRG), differ markedly between the lissencephalic rodent and gyrencephalic primate neocortex. The northern tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) is a rat-sized mammal with a high brain to body mass ratio, which stands phylogenetically mid-way between rodents and primates. Our study provides – for the first time – detailed data on the presence, abundance and distribution of bRG and other distinct NPCs in the developing neocortex of the northern tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri). We show that the developing tree shrew neocortex is characterized by an expanded SVZ, a high abundance of Pax6+ NPCs in the SVZ, and a relatively high percentage of bRG at peak of upper-layer neurogenesis. We further demonstrate that key features of tree shrew neocortex development, e.g., the presence, abundance and distribution of distinct NPCs, are closer related to those of gyrencephalic primates than to those of ferret and lissencephalic rodents. Together, our study provides novel insight into the evolution of bRG and other distinct NPCs in the neocortex development of Euarchontoglires and introduces the tree shrew as a potential novel model organism in the area of human brain development and developmental disorders.

Keywords: neocortex development, neural progenitor, basal radial glia, tree shrew, Tupaia belangeri

Introduction

The neocortex is the most complex part of the mammalian brain and has undergone tremendous expansion during evolution, especially in the primate lineage. The overwhelming majority of neocortical neurons are generated during embryonic and fetal development. They mostly originate from neural stem and progenitor cells (NPCs), which are characterized by distinct cell biological features and located in the two germinal zones: ventricular (VZ) and subventricular zone (SVZ) (Götz and Huttner, 2005; Fietz and Huttner, 2011; LaMonica et al., 2012; Florio and Huttner, 2014; De Juan Romero and Borrell, 2015; Montiel et al., 2016; Namba and Huttner, 2017). The VZ, the most apical layer of the cortical wall, contains the cell bodies of the primary NPCs, the apical progenitors (APs). APs consist of neuroepithelial cells (NECs) that transform into apical radial glia (aRG) at the onset of neurogenesis (Kriegstein and Götz, 2003; Götz and Huttner, 2005) and the apical intermediate progenitors (aIPs), also known as short neural precursors (Gal et al., 2006; Stancik et al., 2010). All three subtypes have an apical domain, which consists of an apical plasma membrane, an apical cell cortex and apical adherens junctions and predominantly maintain a radially oriented process, which spans the entire neocortical wall throughout the cell cycle in NECs and aRG, and retracts from the basal lamina for mitosis in aIPs (Rakic, 1972; Aaku-Saraste et al., 1997; Chenn et al., 1998; Götz and Huttner, 2005; Gal et al., 2006; Marthiens and Ffrench-Constant, 2009). Before the onset of neurogenesis, NECs mainly undergo symmetric proliferative divisions, resulting in the lateral expansion of the VZ (Rakic, 1995). With the onset of neurogenesis, aIPs mostly undergo symmetric neurogenic divisions, while aRG start dividing asymmetrically, thereby giving rise to the secondary NPCs, the basal progenitors (BPs) that accumulate in the SVZ, basal to the VZ (Haubensak et al., 2004; Miyata et al., 2004; Noctor et al., 2004; Stancik et al., 2010). BPs comprise of two major subtypes, the basal intermediate progenitors (bIPs) and basal radial glia (bRG), the latter also referred to as outer RG cells (Hansen et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2011), intermediate RG cells (Reillo et al., 2011) or translocating RG cells (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012). Both BP subtypes lack an apical domain; however, whereas bIPs retract their processes prior to M-phase, bRG maintain at least one radially oriented process throughout the cell cycle with a subset of them reaching up to the basal lamina (Attardo et al., 2008; Fietz et al., 2010; Hansen et al., 2010; Reillo et al., 2011; Nowakowski et al., 2016). Depending on the number and orientation of processes, three different bRG morphotypes have been identified (Betizeau et al., 2013): (1) bRG with a basal process, referred to as bRG-basal-process (-P), (2) bRG with an apical process, referred to as bRG-apical-P and (3) bRG with a basal and an apical process, referred to as bRG-both-P.

Although the SVZ is regarded as the developmental milestone of a six-layered neocortex, its thickness varies considerably between species showing different degrees of neocortex expansion (Smart et al., 2002; Cheung et al., 2010; Fietz et al., 2010; Reillo et al., 2011; Garcia-Moreno et al., 2012; Kelava et al., 2012; Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012, 2017; Sauerland et al., 2018). In particular, the SVZ of primates, that possess an extremely high degree of neocortex expansion, is substantially thicker at peak stages of neurogenesis when compared to non-primate species (Smart et al., 2002; Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012). Besides its increase in thickness, the SVZ of primates and other mammals possessing a relatively expanded neocortex such as ferret, cat, sheep and agouti is clearly subdivided into two morphologically distinct germinal zones: an inner SVZ (iSVZ), which largely resembles mouse SVZ, and an outer SVZ (oSVZ) which is absent in mouse or relatively thin in rat (Smart et al., 2002; Fietz et al., 2010; Hansen et al., 2010; Reillo et al., 2011; Garcia-Moreno et al., 2012; Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012). The increase and remodeling of the SVZ is accompanied by significant changes in its BP subtype composition, mainly affecting their abundance rather than their occurrence. As such, bRG have been shown to occur in the developing neocortex of species from various mammalian orders and infraclasses (Fietz et al., 2010; Hansen et al., 2010; Reillo et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011; Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012, 2017; Sauerland et al., 2018). However, its relative abundance varies substantially between species showing different degrees of neocortex expansion. In mice, the SVZ mostly contains bIPs and only a minor fraction of bRG (∼10%), whereas its abundance increases in the SVZ of sheep, ferret, marmoset and tammar wallaby (∼30%) and peak in the SVZ, especially the oSVZ, of gyrencephalic primates, in which bRG become the most abundant BP type (>50%) (Fietz et al., 2010; Hansen et al., 2010; Reillo et al., 2011; Kelava et al., 2012; Betizeau et al., 2013; Pilz et al., 2013; Florio and Huttner, 2014; Sauerland et al., 2018). Importantly, the overwhelming majority of BPs, i.e., bIPs, in lissencephalic rodents undergoes symmetric proliferative divisions and thus shows limited proliferative potential, whereas a major fraction of BPs, i.e., bRG, in gyrencephalic primates is able to undergo repeated cell division, thereby displaying high proliferative potential (Haubensak et al., 2004; Miyata et al., 2004; Noctor et al., 2004; Attardo et al., 2008; Hansen et al., 2010; Betizeau et al., 2013). This increased abundance in proliferative BPs results in the radial expansion of the SVZ, notably the oSVZ, which ultimately promotes a higher neuronal output in gyrencephalic primates, particularly in human (Fietz et al., 2010; Hansen et al., 2010; Betizeau et al., 2013; Gertz et al., 2014).

The northern tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) is a rat-sized mammal with an average gestation period of 43.7 days (Kuhn and Schwaier, 1973) and a close phylogenetic relationship to primates and rodents (Supplementary Figure 1). It belongs to the separate order Scandentia which is currently grouped with primates and culogos (flying lemurs) within the grandorder Euarchonta, a sister group of Glires consisting of rodents and lagomorphs (Janecka et al., 2007; Song et al., 2012; Kumar et al., 2013). Recent genome studies suggested that the Chinese tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri chinensis) possesses a closer genetic relationship to primates than to rodents (Supplementary Figure 1A) (Fan et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2014). Although the tree shrew exhibits – comparable to most rodents - a lissencephalic neocortex; it has, however, a high brain to body mass ratio and shows neuroanatomical characteristics that are highly similar to those of primates including the cytoarchitecture and organization of the somatosensory, visual and motor cortex (Supplementary Figure 1B) (Sur et al., 1980; Elston et al., 2005; Remple et al., 2006, 2007; Wong and Kaas, 2009b; Veit et al., 2011). Until now, precise data on the presence, abundance and distribution of bRG and other distinct NPCs in the developing tree shrew neocortex are lacking. It was therefore the aim of this study to characterize and quantify the germinal zones and containing NPCs in the developing neocortex of the northern tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri). Moreover, by comparing our results with published data from phylogenetically closely related species, this study aims to answer the question whether key features of tree shrew neocortex development, e.g., the presence, abundance and distribution of the distinct NPCs, show a closer relationship to gyrencephalic primates or to lissencephalic rodents.

Materials and Methods

Brain Samples

Tupaia belangeri brain tissue was received from the animal facilities, Institute of Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Pharmacy, and Psychology, University of Leipzig and Institute of Zoology, University for Veterinary Medicine Hannover. Animals were housed in 125 cm × 100 cm × 80 cm wire mesh cages. Temperature averaged 22°C, humidity was kept at approximately 55% and light/dark cycle was set to 12:12. Water and standard diet pellets (Altromin Spezialfutter GmbH and Co. KG, Lage, Germany) was given ad libitum supplemented by fresh fruits, mealworms and locusts. Breeding pairs were not closely related to each other and pair partners were permanently housed together. Successful mating was indicated by a change in the female receptive behavior toward the male. Successful pregnancy was determined based on body weight gain. Animals were anesthetized by an intraperitoneal overdose of pentobarbital (200 mg/kg). The age of the animals ranged from embryonic/fetal day (E) 32 (n = 2), 37 (n = 2), 45 (n = 2) to postnatal day (P) 1 (n = 2) and was determined with the help of the crown-rump-length (CRL) growth curve described below (Figure 1). All experiments were performed in accordance with German animal welfare legislation and were approved by the Landesdirektion Leipzig. Embryos/fetuses and neonates were carefully dissected, brains were fixed immediately in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for at least 2 days and stored in PBS at 4°C until processing.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Developmental growth curve of Tupaia belangeri. Plot of the relationship between ontogenetic day and crown-rump length (CRL) which has been determined in 67 Tupaia belangeri embryos. The CRL growth curve (red line) was estimated by the following Gompertz function: ontogenetic day = 197.918∗exp[–exp(1.997 – 0.043∗CRL)]. Dark red and light red areas represent the 95% confidence band and the 95% prediction band, respectively. For details, see Section “Materials and Methods.”

Determination of the Tupaia belangeri Growth Curve

Crown-rump-lengths were provided for 57 embryos/fetuses of Tupaia belangeri, all belonging to the tree shrew collection of H.-J. Kuhn (Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; present location: Department of Prosektur Anatomie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany). Detailed descriptions of the collection including preparation procedures have been published previously (Knabe and Kuhn, 1998; Washausen et al., 2005; Knabe et al., 2007, 2008; Knabe and Washausen, 2015). In brief, pregnant females were obtained from the Battelle Institute (Frankfurt/Main, Germany) and from the German Primate Center (Göttingen, Germany) (former Sonderforschungsbereich 89, Cardiology, 1976–1982). Given that in Tupaia belangeri ovulation is induced by copulation, the day of fertilization was considered as ontogenetic day 1. For the construction of the growth curve (Figure 1), 10 additional CRL measurements were included (Kuhn and Schwaier, 1973). Using CurveExpert Professional (Hyams Development, Chattanooga, TN, United States), the CRL growth curve was estimated by the following Gompertz function: ontogenetic day = 197.918∗exp[-exp(1.997 - 0.043∗CRL)].

Immunocytochemistry

Brain samples were processed and subjected to an immunohistochemistry protocol as described previously (Sauerland et al., 2018). In brief, brains were incubated in 30% sucrose in PBS at room temperature, embedded in Tissue-Tek (Sakura Finetek) and stored at -20°C. Cryosections were cut at 30 μm and kept at -20°C. Complete telencephalon was cut coronally and sections at a medium position with regard to the rostro-caudal axis were used for immunohistochemistry and heated for 1 h at 90–95°C in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6), permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS and quenched with 0.1 M glycine. Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C. The following primary antibodies were used: Tbr1 (1:200, rabbit, Millipore, AB 10554), Pax6 (1:100, rabbit, Biozol, BLD 901301), Tbr2 (1:100, sheep, R&D Systems, AF61669), PCNA (1:100, mouse, Novus Biologicals, NB500-106), phosphorylated vimentin (pVim, 1:100, mouse, Abcam, ab22651), Par3 (1:200, rabbit, Millipore, 07-330), ZO-1 (1:200, mouse, Invitrogen, 33-9100), Tau1 (1:100, mouse, Millipore, MAB3420), Brn2 (1:100, mouse, Santa Cruz, sc-393324). Donkey secondary antibodies coupled to Alexa 488, 555, and 647 (1:500, Life Technologies) were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. All sections were counterstained with DAPI (1:500, Sigma), mounted in Mowiol (Merck Biosciences) and kept at 4°C.

Image Acquisition and Analysis

Fluorescence images were acquired with a Leica SP8 confocal laser-scanning microscope, using a 20× or 40× objective. Images were taken as 3.121 μm (20×) or 1.271 μm (40×) single optical sections and processed using Fiji and Photoshop (Adobe) software. Panels of Figures 1–4, 6 represent single optical sections. Panels of Figure 5 represent stacks of 3–5 optical sections. The VZ, SVZ, intermediate zone (IZ)/subplate (SP) and cortical plate (CP) were identified based on their cytoarchitecture as described previously (Sauerland et al., 2018). In brief, the VZ appeared as a densely packed cell layer that lines the lateral ventricle and whose nuclei exhibit radial morphology. The SVZ was identified as a cell layer adjacent to the VZ that exhibits a looser and sparser cell arrangement than the VZ. The IZ/SP was identified as a cell layer that exhibits a very low cell density between the SVZ and the CP. The CP was identified as densely packed cell layer adjacent to the IZ/SP. To compare data across species, iSVZ and oSVZ were identified based on previously established criteria (Smart et al., 2002; Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012). Specifically, the iSVZ was identified as the inner SVZ cell layer that exhibits a higher cell density and a more random cell organization than the oSVZ. The iSVZ corresponded to the dense inner band of Tbr2+ cells, which was localized to the Tau1-free zone surrounding the lateral ventricle (Supplementary Figure 2). The oSVZ was identified as the outer SVZ cell layer that exhibits a relatively loose and sparse cell arrangement and whose nuclei mostly exhibit radial morphology. The oSVZ corresponded to the diffuse outer band of Tbr2+ cells, which was localized to the Tau1-striated zone (Supplementary Figure 2).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

Pax6 and Tbr2 expression in the germinal zones of the developing tree shrew neocortex. (A–D) Double-Immunofluorescence for Pax6 (red) and Tbr2 (green) and DAPI staining (blue) on 30 μm-cryosections of E32–P1 tree shrew neocortex. The top margin of the image corresponds to the transition zone SVZ/intermediate zone. Scale bars, 50 μm. VZ, ventricular zone; SVZ, subventricular zone; iSVZ, inner SVZ; oSVZ, outer SVZ. (E,F) Quantification of Pax6+/Tbr2–, Pax6+/Tbr2+ and Pax6–/Tbr2+ NPCs in the VZ (E) and SVZ (F) of the E32–P1 tree shrew neocortex, expressed as number of cells per 200 μm ventricular surface. Color legend is shown in (F). (G) Quantification of Pax6+ (Pax6+/Tbr2–, Pax6+/Tbr2+) NPCs (G) and Tbr2+ (Pax6–/Tbr2+, Pax6+/Tbr2+) NPCs (H) in the VZ and SVZ of the E32–P1 tree shrew neocortex, expressed as percentage of the sum of VZ and SVZ. Color legend is shown in (H). (I,J) Quantification of Pax6+ (Pax6+/Tbr2–, Pax6+/Tbr2+) NPCs (I) and Tbr2+ (Pax6–/Tbr2+, Pax6+/Tbr2+) NPCs (J) in the iSVZ and oSVZ of the E32–P1 tree shrew neocortex, expressed as percentage of the sum of iSVZ and oSVZ. Color legend is shown in (J). (E–J) Cortical wall corresponding to a total ventricular surface of 4.12–12.081 mm was analyzed. Data represent mean ± SD and are from two brains each.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Open in a new tab

Apical domain markers are concentrated at the developing tree shrew ventricular surface. (A,B) Immunofluorescence for Par3 (A, red), ZO-1 (B, green), and DAPI staining (blue) on 30 μm-cryosections of E37 tree shrew neocortex. Dashed lines indicate the ventricular surface. Scale bars, 50 μm. VZ, ventricular zone. SVZ, subventricular zone.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

Neural progenitor subtypes in the developing tree shrew neocortex. (A–F) Triple-immunofluorescence for phospho-vimentin (pVim, white), Pax6 (red), and Tbr2 (green) and DAPI staining (blue) on 30 μm-cryosections of E37 tree shrew neocortex. The merge images show combined immunofluorescence for pVim, Pax6, and Tbr2. Open arrowheads, cell bodies; solid arrowheads, pVim+ processes. Scale bars, 20 μm. VZ, ventricular zone; SVZ, subventricular zone. (G–I) Quantification of the distinct progenitor cell types at M-phase, identified by their location of mitosis and morphology at M-phase, in the E37 tree shrew neocortex, expressed as the percentage of total pVim+ cells. Data are the sum of two brains. The total number of pVim+ mitoses quantified was 642. (J–M) Quantification of the distinct progenitor cell types at M-phase, identified by pVim staining, that are Pax6+/Tbr2– (red), Pax6+/Tbr2+ (red/green), Pax6–/Tbr2+ (green), or Pax6–/Tbr2– (white) in the E37 tree shrew neocortex. Data are the sum of two brains. The total number of pVim+ mitoses analyzed was as in (G–I). (G–M) AP, apical progenitor; BP, basal progenitor; bIP, basal intermediate progenitor; bRG, basal radial glia, bTG; basal tangential glia; -P, process.

Quantification of cells was performed with Fiji software using a Multiclass Cell Counter plug in Schindelin et al. (2012) and applying a default threshold of 100/255 on dark background. All quantifications were performed on images from the dorsolateral telencephalon. The radial thickness of the germinal zones and CP as well as the length of the ventricular surface were determined using Fiji software. Data were further processed using Prism software.

Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Tree Shrew, Macaque, Ferret, and Rat/Mouse Neocortex Development

Statistical analysis of the relationship between tree shrew, macaque, ferret and rat/mouse neocortex development was conducted in R. Parameters of macaque, ferret and rat/mouse neocortex development at peak of deep-layer and upper-layer neurogenesis were obtained from the literature (Table 1). Due to the fact that not all parameters were available from a single rodent species, data of rat and mouse neocortex development were used, i.e., neurodevelopmental parameters 1–12 were obtained from rat (Sprague Dawley rat) and neurodevelopmental parameters 13–15 were obtained from mouse (Swiss Webster mouse). Parameters of Tupaia belangeri neocortex development at peak of deep-layer and upper-layer neurogenesis were analyzed in this study. Neurodevelopmental parameters 1, 2, 4–12 were obtained from a similar cortical area, predominantly representing somatosensory cortex. In case of neurodevelopmental parameters 3, 13–15, tree shrew and ferret data were obtained from a cortical area, predominantly representing somatosensory cortex, and macaque data were obtained from the visual cortex. The thicknesses of the germinal zones (neurodevelopmental parameters 3, 4) were measured using the images obtained from the literature (Table 1). Taken into account that different protocols were used for the quantification of cells in the developing tree shrew, macaque, ferret and rat neocortex and thus to ensure data comparability, relative values (ratios) of absolute Pax6+ NPC, Tbr2+ NPC and mitotic NPC counts between SVZ and VZ (neurodevelopmental parameters 6–12) were calculated from the absolute values and used in the analysis (Table 2).

Table 1.

List of references of neurodevelopmental parameters used for statistical analysis.

Neurodevelopmental parameter Rat/Mouse Ferret Macaque
1 SVZ thickness at DL neurogenesis (μm) Table 5 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 5 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 5 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012)
2 SVZ thickness at UL neurogenesis (μm) Table 5 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 5 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 5 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012)
3 Ratio of SVZ/VZ thickness at DL neurogenesis Figure 1A (Ida et al., 2006) Figure 1O (Fietz et al., 2010) Figure 1A (Betizeau et al., 2013)
4 Ratio of SVZ/VZ thickness at UL neurogenesis Figure 2B (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2006) Figure 1Q (Fietz et al., 2010) Figure 2A (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012)
5 Ratio of oSVZ/iSVZ thickness at UL neurogenesis Table 5 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 5 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 5 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012)
6 Ratio of Tbr2+ NPCs in SVZ/VZ at DL neurogenesis Table 4 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 4 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 4 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012)
7 Ratio of Tbr2+ NPCs in SVZ/VZ at UL neurogenesis Table 4 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 4 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 4 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012)
8 Ratio of Tbr2+ NPCs in oSVZ/iSVZ at UL neurogenesis Table 4 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 4 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 4 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012)
9 Ratio of Pax6+ NPCs in SVZ/VZ at DL neurogenesis Table 7 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 7 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 7 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012)
10 Ratio of Pax6+ NPCs in SVZ/VZ at UL neurogenesis Table 7 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 7 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 7 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012)
11 Ratio of Pax6+ NPCs in oSVZ/iSVZ at UL neurogenesis Table 7 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 7 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 7 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012)
12 Ratio of mitoses in SVZ/VZ Table 8 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 8 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012) Table 8 (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012)
13 Relative abundance of bRG at UL neurogenesis (%) (Wang et al., 2011) Figure 3L (Fietz et al., 2010) Figure 4E (Betizeau et al., 2013)
14 Relative abundance of Pax6+ bRG at UL neurogenesis (%) (Wang et al., 2011) Figure 3O (Fietz et al., 2010) Figure 3J (Betizeau et al., 2013)
15 Relative abundance of Tbr2+ bRG at UL neurogenesis (%) Figure S8H (Florio et al., 2015) Figure 3O (Fietz et al., 2010) Figure 3J (Betizeau et al., 2013)
Open in a new tab

Parameters of macaque, rat/mouse and ferret neocortex development were obtained from the literature as listed. VZ, ventricular zone; SVZ, subventricular zone; iSVZ, inner SVZ; oSVZ, outer SVZ; DL, deep-layer; UL, upper-layer. For details, see Section “Materials and Methods.”

Table 2.

Untransformed values of neurodevelopmental parameters of tree shrew, macaque, rat/mouse and ferret used for statistical analysis.

Neurodevelopmental parameter Rat/Mouse Ferret Tree shrew Macaque
1 SVZ thickness at DL neurogenesis (μm) 27 97 82.1 440
2 SVZ thickness at UL neurogenesis (μm) 237 545 467.034 2590
3 Ratio of SVZ/VZ thickness at DL neurogenesis 0.333 0.8 0.778 0.667
4 Ratio of SVZ/VZ thickness at UL neurogenesis 0.875 2.333 5.901 37.5
5 Ratio of oSVZ/iSVZ thickness at UL neurogenesis 0.975 1.148 6.436 4.18
6 Ratio of Tbr2+ NPCs in SVZ/VZ at DL neurogenesis 1.563 2.464 1.772 28.667
7 Ratio of Tbr2+ NPCs in SVZ/VZ at UL neurogenesis 1.196 4.581 16.813 39.4
8 Ratio of Tbr2+ NPCs in oSVZ/iSVZ at UL neurogenesis 0.134 0.331 2.337 1.736
9 Ratio of Pax6+ NPCs in SVZ/VZ at DL neurogenesis 0.104 0.056 0.219 0.125
10 Ratio of Pax6+ NPCs in SVZ/VZ at UL neurogenesis 0.138 0.697 4.131 3.85
11 Ratio of Pax6+ NPCs in oSVZ/iSVZ at UL neurogenesis 0.026 0.817 2.955 1.982
12 Ratio of mitoses in SVZ/VZ 0.678 1.529 2.276 1.788
13 Relative abundance of bRG at UL neurogenesis (%) 8.89 42 24.664 62
14 Relative abundance of Pax6+ bRG at UL neurogenesis (%) 100 100 86 91
15 Relative abundance of Tbr2+ bRG at UL neurogenesis (%) 75 0 23 44
Open in a new tab

Neurodevelopmental parameters of tree shrew were analyzed in this study. All other parameters were obtained from the literature (Table 1). VZ, ventricular zone; SVZ, subventricular zone; iSVZ, inner SVZ; oSVZ, outer SVZ; DL, deep-layer; UL, upper-layer. For details, see section “Materials and Methods.”

For rank comparison, untransformed values of distinct parameters of cortex development (Table 2) were used. A rank (1–4) was assigned within each parameter to each species and the average rank over all parameters for each species was calculated. Statistical differences between the average ranks of the different species were tested with the Kruskal–Wallis-test followed by Conover’s post hoc test using Holm correction (Pohlert, 2014). P-values below 0.05 were considered significant. For hierarchical clustering, principal component analysis (PCA) and Euclidean distance computation, untransformed values of distinct parameters of cortex development (Table 2) were transformed into z-scores (standard scores). Hierarchical clustering of species was performed based on Euclidean distance.

Results

SVZ Is Markedly Increased at Peak of Upper-Layer Neurogenesis in the Tree Shrew Neocortex

We first examined the development of the germinal zones in the tree shrew neocortex, and analyzed E32–P1 cortical sections by immunohistochemistry for PCNA, a specific marker for proliferating cells (Figures 2A–D and Supplementary Figure 3). At the earliest developmental stage analyzed, the VZ appeared as a prominent and tightly packed cell layer in which PCNA+ nuclei show radial morphology (Figure 2A). The SVZ, in which PCNA+ nuclei are more loosely arranged, was already present at that stage but appeared relatively thin (Figure 2A). Quantification of the thickness of the germinal zones revealed the VZ to be the predominant germinal zone at E32 (Figures 2E–G). After E32, the thickness of the VZ progressively declined (Figures 2B–E), whereas that of the SVZ rapidly increased, especially until E37, revealing the SVZ to become the major germinal zone at later stages of tree shrew neocortex development (Figures 2B–D,F,G). These findings are similar to the development of the germinal zones in the neocortex of gyrencephalic primates including human and other species exhibiting an expanded neocortex such as ferret, but are in contrast to that of lissencephalic rodents in which the VZ constitutes the major NPC pool throughout development (Smart et al., 2002; Kriegstein et al., 2006; Bayatti et al., 2008; Kriegstein and Alvarez-Buylla, 2009; Fietz et al., 2010; Hansen et al., 2010; Reillo et al., 2011; Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012). Interestingly, when a clear distinction between the iSVZ and oSVZ was detectable at E37, its thickness ratio was similar to that of macaque and clearly different when compared to that of rat and ferret (Figure 2H) (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Development of the germinal zones in the tree shrew neocortex. (A–D) Immunofluorescence for PCNA (yellow) and DAPI staining (blue) on 30 μm-cryosections of E32–P1 tree shrew neocortex. The top margin of the image corresponds to the transition zone SVZ/intermediate zone. Scale bars, 50 μm. VZ, ventricular zone; SVZ, subventricular zone; iSVZ, inner SVZ; oSVZ, outer SVZ. (E) Quantification of the VZ thickness of the E32–P1 tree shrew neocortex. (F) Quantification of the SVZ thickness of the E32–P1 tree shrew neocortex. (G) Quantification of the VZ and SVZ thickness of the E32–P1 tree shrew neocortex, expressed as percentage of the sum of VZ and SVZ. (H) Quantification of the iSVZ and oSVZ thickness of the E37 tree shrew neocortex, expressed as percentage of the sum of iSVZ and oSVZ. (E–H) Data represent mean ± SD and were obtained from two consecutive sections of two brains each.

To investigate whether the development of the germinal zones, especially the SVZ, and of the CP, show a similar time course, we next analyzed cortical sections by immunohistochemistry for Tbr1, that is characteristically expressed by early-born deep-layer – but not by late-born upper-layer – neurons (Figures 3A–D and Supplementary Figures 4A–D) (Hevner et al., 2001; Englund et al., 2005; Molyneaux et al., 2007; Toma and Hanashima, 2015). Quantification of the CP thickness revealed that corticogenesis in the tree shrew starts before E32 and is largely completed at the time of birth, with E32 representing the stage at which mainly Tbr1+ deep-layers are being produced and E37 the stage at which largely Tbr2– upper-layers are being produced (Figure 3E). Double-immunofluorescence for Brn2, characteristically expressed by upper-layer neurons, and Tbr1 revealed that a major fraction of Tbr1– cells in the E37–P1 CP belong to the population of upper-layer neurons, thus corroborating E32 to represent the peak of deep-layer and E37 the peak of upper-layer production (Supplementary Figures 4E–H) (McEvilly et al., 2002; Sugitani et al., 2002; Britanova et al., 2008; Glatzle et al., 2017). Together, this indicates that – similar to other mammalian species – the SVZ of the developing tree shrew neocortex is an important site of neurogenesis, being largest at developmental stages when upper layers of the CP are being produced (Kriegstein et al., 2006; Kriegstein and Alvarez-Buylla, 2009).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Cortical plate development in the tree shrew neocortex. (A–D) Immunofluorescence for Tbr1 (red) and DAPI staining (blue) on 30 μm-cryosections of E32–P1 tree shrew neocortex. The bottom margin corresponds to the transition zone CP/subplate. Cortical layers II–VI are indicated in (D). Scale bars, 50 μm. CP, cortical plate. (E) Quantification of the thickness of Tbr1+ and Tbr1– CP layers in the E32–P1 tree shrew neocortex. Data represent mean ± SD and were obtained from consecutive two sections of two brains each.

Pax6+ NPCs Are Markedly Increased at Peak of Upper-Layer Neurogenesis in the Tree Shrew Neocortex

We next focused our analysis on the characterization of the distinct NPCs in the tree shrew neocortex, and analyzed E32–P1 cortical sections by double-immunofluorescence for the expression of the NPC markers Pax6, a transcription factor characteristically expressed by APs and bRG, and Tbr2, a transcription factor characteristically expressed by bIPs (Figures 4A–D) (Englund et al., 2005; Fietz et al., 2010; Hansen et al., 2010; Reillo et al., 2011). At all stages analyzed, the overwhelming majority of Tbr2+ (Pax6–/Tbr2+, Pax6+/Tbr2+) NPCs is present in the tree shrew SVZ, as observed in most mammalian species (Figures 4A–F,H). At peak of upper-layer neurogenesis, i.e., E37, when iSVZ and oSVZ were clearly distinguishable from each other, a large proportion of Tbr2+ NPCs resides in the iSVZ. However, the majority of Tbr2+ NPCs is distributed in the tree shrew oSVZ, which is similar to the developing macaque neocortex but different to that of ferret and rat, in which the majority of Tbr2+ NPCs remained in the iSVZ (Figures 4B,J) (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012).

In line with observations in other mammalian species (Götz et al., 1998; Englund et al., 2005; Osumi et al., 2008), NPCs of the tree shrew VZ were Pax6+ and largely Tbr2– with the number of Pax6+/Tbr2– NPCs progressively declining during development (Figures 4A–E). At E32 the number of Pax6+ (Pax6+/Tbr2–, Pax6+/Tbr2+) NPCs was relatively small in the tree shrew SVZ (Figures 4A,F), thus revealing Pax6+ NPCs to be predominantly distributed in the tree shrew VZ at early stages of neocortex development (Figure 4G). However, at later developmental stages, especially at peak of upper-layer neurogenesis, i.e., E37, the number of Pax6+ (Pax6+/Tbr2–, Pax6+/Tbr2+) NPCs markedly increases in the tree shrew SVZ (Figures 4B–D,F) shifting the distribution of Pax6+ (Pax6+/Tbr2–, Pax6+/Tbr2+) NPCs to the SVZ, especially the oSVZ (Figures 4G,I). This is in line with findings in the developing neocortex of macaque and human, but in contrast to those reported for ferret and rat, in which the majority of Pax6+ NPCs remained in the VZ until the end of neurogenesis (Bayatti et al., 2008; Fish et al., 2008; Fietz et al., 2010; Hansen et al., 2010; Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2012; Betizeau et al., 2013). Unlike the majority of Tbr2+ NPCs, which also expressed Pax6+ (Figures 4F,H), the vast majority of Pax6+ NPCs in the tree shrew SVZ were Tbr2– with the highest abundance of NPCs exclusively expressing Pax6 being present at E37 (Figures 4F,G). This raises the possibility that – similar to the developing neocortex of primates and other species exhibiting an expanded neocortex such as ferret – the tree shrew SVZ contains bRG at high abundance at peak of upper layer neurogenesis.

High Relative Abundance of bRG at Peak of Upper-Layer Neurogenesis in the Tree Shrew Neocortex

To examine whether Pax6+/Tbr2– NPCs in the tree shrew SVZ extend radially oriented processes at M-phase, and thus represent bRG, we analyzed E37 cortical sections by immunohistochemistry for triple immunofluorescence for Pax6, Tbr2 and phosphorylated vimentin (pVim), which visualizes cellular processes of mitotic NPCs (Figures 5A–F). This revealed that apically dividing Pax6+ NPCs in the tree shrew VZ, i.e., APs, exhibit a radially oriented process (Figure 5A). Moreover, the tree shrew SVZ not only comprises mitoses that lack processes of any substantial length, i.e., bIPs, with a large number of them being Tbr2+ (Figures 5B,L), but also mitoses that exhibit at least one well-developed radially oriented process, i.e., bRG, with the majority of them expressing Pax6 but not Tbr2 (Figures 5C–E,K).

Intriguingly, also the majority of dividing bIPs in the developing tree shrew SVZ were found to be Pax6+ (Figure 5L). A relatively high abundance of Pax6+ bIPs has been described for the developing macaque SVZ, but not for that of mouse or rat (Betizeau et al., 2013).

None of the apical processes extending from the dividing bRG reached the ventricular surface (Figures 5D,E). Moreover, Par3, a protein associated with the apical cell cortex (Manabe et al., 2002; Costa et al., 2008) and ZO-1, a protein associated with apical adherens junctions (Aaku-Saraste et al., 1996), were highly concentrated at the tree shrew ventricular surface, but not in the tree shrew SVZ (Figure 6) indicating that tree shrew bRG lack an apical domain. Importantly, the relative bRG abundance in the tree shrew SVZ was much higher than that obtained in the developing SVZ of lissencephalic rodents; however, slightly smaller than that obtained in the developing SVZ of gyrencephalic primates including human and other species exhibiting an expanded neocortex including ferret (Figure 5H) (Fietz et al., 2010; Hansen et al., 2010; Reillo et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011; Betizeau et al., 2013). Moreover, similar to the developing macaque neocortex, we observed three bRG morphologies in the tree shrew SVZ (Betizeau et al., 2013): bRG exhibiting a basal process, referred to as bRG-basal-process (-P), bRG exhibiting an apical process, referred to as bRG-apical-P and bRG exhibiting both, a basal and an apical process, referred to as bRG-both-P with the overwhelming majority of tree shrew bRG representing bRG-basal-P (Figure 5I). Interestingly, a small percentage of NPCs in the tree shrew E37 SVZ exhibited one or two tangentially oriented processes, i.e., processes that are oriented parallel to the ventricular surface at mitosis (Figures 5F,H), previously referred to as basal tangential glia (bTG) (Sauerland et al., 2018). This cell type has been shown to be present in the developing macaque SVZ (Betizeau et al., 2013) in a similar abundance; however, appears to be absent in the developing rodent SVZ.

Taken together, our findings reveal that the developing tree shrew SVZ consists of at least three main NPCs: the process-lacking bIP and the process-bearing bRG and bTG, all exhibiting similar cell biological features including location of mitosis, process retention and direction at mitosis, and molecular marker expression as has been described for gyrencephalic primates. Importantly, the tree shrew neocortex exhibits a relatively high relative abundance of bRG at peak of upper-layer neurogenesis. In conclusion, our data reveal that key features of tree shrew neocortex development, e.g., the development of the germinal zones and the distribution and abundance of distinct NPCs appear to show a closer relationship to gyrencephalic primates than to lissencephalic rodents.

Key Features of Tree Shrew Neocortex Development Are Closer Related to Those of Gyrencephalic Primates Than to Those of Lissencephalic Rodents

To quantify the strength of the relationship between neocortex development of the tree shrew and phylogenetically closely related species, we obtained distinct neurodevelopmental parameters of the tree shrew, a gyrencephalic primate (i.e., macaque), a lissencephalic rodent (i.e., rat, mouse) and, for comparison, a gyrencephalic carnivore (i.e., ferret) that exhibits an encephalization quotient similar to the tree shrew (Supplementary Figure 1B). We first used a rank test and compared the average ranks, which were obtained over all neurodevelopmental parameters for each species, between the four different species (Table 2 and Figure 7A). This revealed that the average rank of mouse/rat is significantly different when compared to that of all other species and most similar to that of ferret, indicating that the pattern of neurodevelopmental parameters of mouse/rat is clearly distinct from ferret, tree shrew and macaque and more similar to that of ferret than to that of tree shrew and macaque (Figure 7A). Intriguingly, the average rank of tree shrew differs significantly from that of mouse/rat, but not from that of ferret and macaque, suggesting that the pattern of tree shrew neurodevelopmental parameters is closer related to that of macaque and ferret than to that of mouse/rat (Figure 7A). As the smallest difference in the average rank has been observed between the tree shrew and the macaque, neurodevelopmental parameters of tree shrew appear to be closest related to those of macaque (Figure 7A).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Open in a new tab

Rank test and Euclidean distance computation illustrating the relationship between tree shrew, macaque, ferret and rat/mouse neocortex development. (A) Bar plot showing the average ranks, which were obtained over all neurodevelopmental parameters of tree shrew, macaque, ferret and rat/mouse (Table 2). Statistical differences between the average ranks of the different species were tested with the Kruskal–Wallis-test followed by Conover’s post hoc test using Holm correction. Asterisks indicate significant P-values (P < 0.05). (B–E) Bar plots by Euclidean distance computation using z-transformed values of distinct parameters of tree shrew, macaque, ferret and rat/mouse neocortex development (Table 2). (A–E) For details, see Section “Materials and Methods.”

In a next step, neurodevelopmental parameters of tree shrew, macaque, rat/mouse and ferret were compared by calculating pair-wise Euclidean distances between them (Figures 7B–E). This showed that the shortest Euclidean distance, and thus the highest similarity, was observed between neurodevelopmental parameters of rat/mouse and ferret (Figures 7D,E). Neurodevelopmental parameters of the tree shrew exhibited the shortest Euclidean distance, and thus the highest similarity, to those of macaque, and a shorter Euclidean distance to those of ferret than to that of rat/mouse (Figure 7C). Moreover, principal component (PC) analysis using the neurodevelopmental parameters of tree shrew, macaque, rat/mouse and ferret revealed that on the first PC, which explains about two-thirds of the total variance, the score depicting tree shrew neocortex development falls closest to that of macaque and more closer to that of ferret than to that of rat/mouse, indicating that tree shrew neocortex development is most similar to that of macaque and more similar to that of ferret than to that of rat/mouse (Figure 8A).

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Open in a new tab

Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering illustrating the relationship between tree shrew, macaque, ferret and rat/mouse neocortex development. (A) Cluster plot by PCA using z-transformed values of distinct parameters of tree shrew, macaque, ferret and rat/mouse neocortex development (Table 2). (B) Heatmap showing hierarchical clustering of z-transformed values of distinct parameters of neocortex development between tree shrew, macaque, ferret and rat/mouse (Table 2). Hierarchical clustering of columns was performed based on Euclidean distance. Rows were sorted in order of increasing distance between the parameters of tree shrew and macaque from top to bottom. Row numbers refer to neurodevelopmental parameters as listed in Table 2. UL, upper layer; DL, deep layer. (A,B) For details, see Section “Materials and Methods.”

The results were corroborated when the parameters of tree shrew, macaque, rat/mouse and ferret neocortex development were clustered hierarchically with single parameters being sorted in order of increasing distance between tree shrew and macaque (Figure 8B). Again, this showed that neurodevelopmental parameters of rat/mouse and ferret are most closely related to each other and that parameters of tree shrew neocortex development are most closely related to those of macaque. Among the parameters showing the highest resemblance between tree shrew and macaque neocortex development were: the ratio of Pax6+ NPCs in SVZ/VZ and the relative abundance of Pax6+ bRG at upper-layer neurogenesis, both being clearly distinct from neocortex development of rodents (Figure 8B). Together, the results of the statistical analysis of the relationship between the tree shrew and related species indicate that key features of tree shrew neocortex development are most closely related to those of gyrencephalic primates and more closely related to those of ferret than to those of lissencephalic rodents.

Discussion

This study provides – for the first time – detailed data on the presence, abundance and distribution of the distinct NPCs in the developing neocortex of the northern tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri). We show that – similar to gyrencephalic primates – the developing tree shrew neocortex is characterized by an expanded SVZ, a high abundance of Pax6+ NPCs in the SVZ, and a relatively high percentage of bRG at peak of upper-layer neurogenesis. Using rank comparison, Euclidian distance computation, PCA and hierarchical clustering, this study provides first evidence that key features of tree shrew neocortex development, i.e., the development of the germinal zones and the distribution and abundance of distinct NPCs, are indeed closer related to those of gyrencephalic primates than to those of ferret and lissencephalic rodents. Hence, our results support the hypothesis that physiological, neuroanatomical and developmental characteristics of the tree shrew are very closely related to primates (Sur et al., 1980; Elston et al., 2005; Remple et al., 2007; Wong and Kaas, 2009a; Veit et al., 2011; Knabe and Washausen, 2015; Xiao et al., 2017; Yao, 2017).

Given that the tree shrew possesses a lissencephalic neocortex, our study provides further evidence for the notion that the abundant occurrence of bRG is not exclusively linked to the development of a gyrencephalic neocortex (Garcia-Moreno et al., 2012; Kelava et al., 2012; Lewitus et al., 2013). Moreover, our statistical analysis reveals neurodevelopmental parameters of tree shrew to be closest related to gyrencephalic macaque and those of gyrencephalic ferret to be closest related to lissencephalic rat/mouse, thus indicating that the abundance and distribution of distinct NPCs seem not to be correlated with the degree of cortical surface folding. In this regard, it would be interesting to unravel the relationship of tree shrew neocortex development to that of gyrencephalic rodents such as agouti and lissencephalic primates such as marmoset in more depth. However, as the available data of neocortex development of gyrencephalic rodents and lissencephalic primates are limited and currently not matched to neurogenic stages, we have not included them in our statistical analysis (Garcia-Moreno et al., 2012; Kelava et al., 2012). Thus, further studies including a wider range of developmental stages and neurodevelopmental parameters such as absolute values of NPC counts, cell cycle length and NPC division mode of more different mammalian species are necessary in order to gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between neocortex development of the tree shrew and phylogenetically closely related animals.

Interestingly, our data show that – although a large number of dividing bIPs in the developing tree shrew neocortex express Tbr2 – the overwhelming majority of them express Pax6. In this context it is interesting to note that the majority of bIPs in the developing macaque neocortex is able to proliferate and seems to sustain Pax6 expression whereas the majority of bIPs in the rat and mouse neocortex undergoes symmetric neurogenic division and downregulates Pax6 (Betizeau et al., 2013). It might therefore be speculated that – similar to gyrencephalic primates – the majority of bIPs in the tree shrew neocortex might belong to the proliferative subtype. Indeed, the rapid expansion of the SVZ as well as rapid increase of Pax6+ NPCs in the tree shrew SVZ between E32–37, which are accompanied by only a moderate decrease in VZ size, support the notion of self-amplifying NPCs being present in high abundance in the tree shrew SVZ. Moreover, our data indicate that the period of neurogenesis, specifically the period between peak of upper- and deep-layer neurogenesis, in the tree shrew neocortex is relatively short (approximately 5 days) being similar to that of rat (approximately 4 days) and much shorter when compared to that of ferret (approximately 12 days) (Workman et al., 2013). Hence, the high abundance of highly proliferative NPCs, i.e., proliferative bIPs and bRG, in the developing neocortex might enable the tree shrew to achieve an encephalization quotient similar to that of ferret and much higher when compared to that of rat, e.g., by producing more cells (neurons) per time unit. Further studies using long-term live cell imaging of NPCs in the developing tree shrew neocortex are needed in order to evaluate the proliferative potential and contribution of the distinct NPCs, specifically of bIPs and bRG, to tree shrew neocortex development.

The tree shrew has been receiving increasing attention as an experimental model organism for studying fundamental biological functions and disease mechanisms including viral and bacterial infections, cancer, metabolic diseases and central nervous system related functions and disorders such as psychosocial stress, learning, aging, acoustic communication, myopia and Alzheimer’s disease (Binz et al., 1990; Fuchs and Flügge, 2002; Cao et al., 2003; Fuchs et al., 2004; Schehka et al., 2007; Schehka and Zimmermann, 2009; Konerding et al., 2011; Yamashita et al., 2012; Xiao et al., 2017; Yao, 2017). Because of the close phylogenetic and genetic relationship to primates, a short life span (6–8 years) and reproductive cycle (∼6 weeks), and high reproductivity with an average litter size of 2–3, the tree shrew has been proposed to replace primates in biomedical research (Norton and McBrien, 1992; Cao et al., 2003; Xiao et al., 2017; Yao, 2017). Moreover, the release of a publicly available annotated tree shrew genome sequence, the recent development of tree shrew transgenic technology and the current establishment of tree shrew inbred lines has greatly consolidated the position of the tree shrew in the field of disease animal models (Fan et al., 2013; Li et al., 2017; Yao, 2017). Until now, rodents, i.e., rat and mouse, have been most commonly used to model human brain development and to study developmental brain disorders (Florio and Huttner, 2014; Fernandez et al., 2016). However, because of the differences in neocortex development, specifically in the abundance and distribution of the distinct NPCs, between rodent and human, alternative model organisms exhibiting NPC characteristics similar to humans are urgently needed in order to better model and understand human neocortex development and developmental disorders (LaMonica et al., 2012). As the use of non-human primates in biomedical research is ethically troubling, the search for non-primate model organisms, that reflect key aspects of human neocortex development, is warranted (Barnhill et al., 2016; DeGrazia, 2016; Andersen and Winter, 2017; Neuhaus, 2017). By demonstrating that the tree shrew shows NPC characteristics very similar to gyrencephalic primates including human, this study introduced a potential novel experimental organism as an alternative to primates, which is seemingly more suitable than ferret and rodents, to model and understand specific aspects of human neocortex developmental and developmental brain disorders, i.e., where neocortex size is affected such as microcephaly.

Conclusion

This study reveals that the developing tree shrew neocortex is characterized by an expanded SVZ, a high abundance of Pax6+ NPCs in the SVZ, and a relatively high percentage of bRG at peak of upper-layer neurogenesis. Moreover, it provides first evidence that key features of tree shrew neocortex development, i.e., the development of the germinal zones and the distribution and abundance of distinct NPCs, show a closer relationship to those of gyrencephalic primates than to those of ferret and lissencephalic rodents. Together, our data provides novel insight into the evolution of bRG and other distinct NPCs in the neocortex development of Euarchontoglires and introduces the tree shrew as a potential novel model organism in the area of human brain development and developmental disorders.

Author Contributions

SR and SF: conceived and designed the experiments. SR, HB, WK, EZ, RR, and JS: performed the experiments and/or contributed materials. SR, WK, and SF: analyzed the data. SR, WK, EZ, RR, JS, and SF: discussed the data. SR, WK, and SF: wrote the article. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Gabriele Lindner, Kevin Richter, Megan Glatzle, and Christine Sauerland for their technical support, Annelies Herbert, Iris Grages, and Johanna Samtlebe for excellent animal care, and Birgit Hassfurther for tree shrew colony management. We are very grateful to Holger Kirsten (IMISE, Universität Leipzig) for his helpful recommendations on the statistical analysis.

Footnotes

Funding. This work was supported by the Society of Laboratory Animal Science (GV-SOLAS).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnana.2018.00029/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (6.5MB, PDF)

References

  1. Aaku-Saraste E., Hellwig A., Huttner W. B. (1996). Loss of occludin and functional tight junctions, but not ZO-1, during neural tube closure–remodeling of the neuroepithelium prior to neurogenesis. Dev. Biol. 180 664–679. 10.1006/dbio.1996.0336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aaku-Saraste E., Oback B., Hellwig A., Huttner W. B. (1997). Neuroepithelial cells downregulate their plasma membrane polarity prior to neural tube closure and neurogenesis. Mech. Dev. 69 71–81. 10.1016/S0925-4773(97)00156-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersen M. L., Winter L. M. F. (2017). Animal models in biological and biomedical research - experimental and ethical concerns. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 10.1590/0001-3765201720170238 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Attardo A., Calegari F., Haubensak W., Wilsch-Brauninger M., Huttner W. B. (2008). Live imaging at the onset of cortical neurogenesis reveals differential appearance of the neuronal phenotype in apical versus basal progenitor progeny. PLoS One 3:e2388. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barnhill A., Joffe S., Miller F. G. (2016). The ethics of infection challenges in primates. Hastings Cent. Rep. 46 20–26. 10.1002/hast.580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayatti N., Moss J. A., Sun L., Ambrose P., Ward J. F., Lindsay S., et al. (2008). A molecular neuroanatomical study of the developing human neocortex from 8 to 17 postconceptional weeks revealing the early differentiation of the subplate and subventricular zone. Cereb. Cortex 18 1536–1548. 10.1093/cercor/bhm184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Betizeau M., Cortay V., Patti D., Pfister S., Gautier E., Bellemin-Menard A., et al. (2013). Precursor diversity and complexity of lineage relationships in the outer subventricular zone of the primate. Neuron 80 442–457. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Binz H., Zurhorst C., Zimmermann E., Rahmann H. (1990). Neuronal substrates involved in processing of communicative acoustic signals in tree shrews: a 2-deoxyglucose study. Neurosci. Lett. 112 25–30. 10.1016/0304-3940(90)90316-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Britanova O., De Juan Romero C., Cheung A., Kwan K. Y., Schwark M., Gyorgy A., et al. (2008). Satb2 is a postmitotic determinant for upper-layer neuron specification in the neocortex. Neuron 57 378–392. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.12.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cao J., Yang E. B., Su J. J., Li Y., Chow P. (2003). The tree shrews: adjuncts and alternatives to primates as models for biomedical research. J. Med. Primatol. 32 123–130. 10.1034/j.1600-0684.2003.00022.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chenn A., Zhang Y. A., Chang B. T., Mcconnell S. K. (1998). Intrinsic polarity of mammalian neuroepithelial cells. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 11 183–193. 10.1006/mcne.1998.0680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheung A. F., Kondo S., Abdel-Mannan O., Chodroff R. A., Sirey T. M., Bluy L. E., et al. (2010). The subventricular zone is the developmental milestone of a 6-layered neocortex: comparisons in metatherian and eutherian mammals. Cereb. Cortex 20 1071–1081. 10.1093/cercor/bhp168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Costa M. R., Wen G., Lepier A., Schroeder T., Götz M. (2008). Par-complex proteins promote proliferative progenitor divisions in the developing mouse cerebral cortex. Development 135 11–22. 10.1242/dev.009951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. De Juan Romero C., Borrell V. (2015). Coevolution of radial glial cells and the cerebral cortex. Glia 63 1303–1319. 10.1002/glia.22827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. DeGrazia D. (2016). Nonhuman primates, human need, and ethical constraints. Hastings Cent. Rep. 46 27–28. 10.1002/hast.601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Elston G. N., Elston A., Casagrande V., Kaas J. H. (2005). Areal specialization of pyramidal cell structure in the visual cortex of the tree shrew: a new twist revealed in the evolution of cortical circuitry. Exp. Brain Res. 163 13–20. 10.1007/s00221-004-2131-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Englund C., Fink A., Lau C., Pham D., Daza R. A., Bulfone A., et al. (2005). Pax6 Tbr2 and Tbr1 are expressed sequentially by radial glia, intermediate progenitor cells, and postmitotic neurons in developing neocortex. J. Neurosci. 25 247–251. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2899-04.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fan Y., Huang Z. Y., Cao C. C., Chen C. S., Chen Y. X., Fan D. D., et al. (2013). Genome of the Chinese tree shrew. Nat. Commun. 4:1426. 10.1038/ncomms2416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fernandez V., Llinares-Benadero C., Borrell V. (2016). Cerebral cortex expansion and folding: what have we learned? EMBO J. 35 1021–1044. 10.15252/embj.201593701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fietz S. A., Huttner W. B. (2011). Cortical progenitor expansion, self-renewal and neurogenesis-a polarized perspective. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21 23–35. 10.1016/j.conb.2010.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fietz S. A., Kelava I., Vogt J., Wilsch-Brauninger M., Stenzel D., Fish J. L., et al. (2010). OSVZ progenitors of human and ferret neocortex are epithelial-like and expand by integrin signaling. Nat. Neurosci. 13 690–699. 10.1038/nn.2553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fish J. L., Dehay C., Kennedy H., Huttner W. B. (2008). Making bigger brains-the evolution of neural-progenitor-cell division. J. Cell Sci. 121 2783–2793. 10.1242/jcs.023465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Florio M., Albert M., Taverna E., Namba T., Brandl H., Lewitus E., et al. (2015). Human-specific gene ARHGAP11B promotes basal progenitor amplification and neocortex expansion. Science 347 1465–1470. 10.1126/science.aaa1975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Florio M., Huttner W. B. (2014). Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex. Development 141 2182–2194. 10.1242/dev.090571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fuchs E., Czeh B., Flugge G. (2004). Examining novel concepts of the pathophysiology of depression in the chronic psychosocial stress paradigm in tree shrews. Behav. Pharmacol. 15 315–325. 10.1097/00008877-200409000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fuchs E., Flügge G. (2002). Social stress in tree shrews: effects on physiology, brain function, and behavior of subordinate individuals. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 73 247–258. 10.1016/S0091-3057(02)00795-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gal J. S., Morozov Y. M., Ayoub A. E., Chatterjee M., Rakic P., Haydar T. F. (2006). Molecular and morphological heterogeneity of neural precursors in the mouse neocortical proliferative zones. J. Neurosci. 26 1045–1056. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4499-05.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Garcia-Moreno F., Vasistha N. A., Trevia N., Bourne J. A., Molnar Z. (2012). Compartmentalization of cerebral cortical germinal zones in a lissencephalic primate and gyrencephalic rodent. Cereb. Cortex 22 482–492. 10.1093/cercor/bhr312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gertz C. C., Lui J. H., Lamonica B. E., Wang X., Kriegstein A. R. (2014). Diverse behaviors of outer radial glia in developing ferret and human cortex. J. Neurosci. 34 2559–2570. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2645-13.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Glatzle M., Hoops M., Kauffold J., Seeger J., Fietz S. A. (2017). Development of deep and upper neuronal layers in the domestic cat, sheep and pig neocortex. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 46 397–404. 10.1111/ahe.12282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Götz M., Huttner W. B. (2005). The cell biology of neurogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6 777–788. 10.1038/nrm1739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Götz M., Stoykova A., Gruss P. (1998). Pax6 controls radial glia differentiation in the cerebral cortex. Neuron 21 1031–1044. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80621-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hansen D. V., Lui J. H., Parker P. R., Kriegstein A. R. (2010). Neurogenic radial glia in the outer subventricular zone of human neocortex. Nature 464 554–561. 10.1038/nature08845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Haubensak W., Attardo A., Denk W., Huttner W. B. (2004). Neurons arise in the basal neuroepithelium of the early mammalian telencephalon: a major site of neurogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 3196–3201. 10.1073/pnas.0308600100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hevner R. F., Shi L., Justice N., Hsueh Y.-P., Sheng M., Smiga S., et al. (2001). Tbr1 regulates differentiation of the preplate and layer 6. Neuron 29 353–366. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00211-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ida M., Shuo T., Hirano K., Tokita Y., Nakanishi K., Matsui F., et al. (2006). Identification and functions of chondroitin sulfate in the milieu of neural stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 281 5982–5991. 10.1074/jbc.M507130200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Janecka J. E., Miller W., Pringle T. H., Wiens F., Zitzmann A., Helgen K. M., et al. (2007). Molecular and genomic data identify the closest living relative of primates. Science 318 792–794. 10.1126/science.1147555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kelava I., Reillo I., Murayama A. Y., Kalinka A. T., Stenzel D., Tomancak P., et al. (2012). Abundant occurrence of basal radial glia in the subventricular zone of embryonic neocortex of a lissencephalic primate, the common marmoset Callithrix jacchus. Cereb. Cortex 22 469–481. 10.1093/cercor/bhr301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Knabe W., Kuhn H. J. (1998). Pattern of cell death during optic cup formation in the tree shrew Tupaia belangeri. J. Comp. Neurol. 401 352–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Knabe W., Washausen S. (2015). Early development of the nervous system of the eutherian Tupaia belangeri. Primate Biol. 2 25–56. 10.5194/pb-2-25-2015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Knabe W., Washausen S., Happel N., Kuhn H. J. (2007). Development of starburst cholinergic amacrine cells in the retina of Tupaia belangeri. J. Comp. Neurol. 502 584–597. 10.1002/cne.21324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Knabe W., Washausen S., Happel N., Kuhn H. J. (2008). Diversity in mammalian chiasmatic architecture: ipsilateral axons are deflected at glial arches in the prechiasmatic optic nerve of the eutherian Tupaia belangeri. J. Comp. Neurol. 508 437–457. 10.1002/cne.21694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Konerding W. S., Brunke J., Schehka S., Zimmermann E. (2011). Is acoustic evaluation in a non-primate mammal, the tree shrew, affected by context? Anim. Cogn. 14 787–795. 10.1007/s10071-011-0411-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kriegstein A., Alvarez-Buylla A. (2009). The glial nature of embryonic and adult neural stem cells. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 32 149–184. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kriegstein A., Noctor S., Martinez-Cerdeno V. (2006). Patterns of neural stem and progenitor cell division may underlie evolutionary cortical expansion. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7 883–890. 10.1038/nrn2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kriegstein A. R., Götz M. (2003). Radial glia diversity: a matter of cell fate. Glia 43 37–43. 10.1002/glia.10250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kuhn H. J., Schwaier A. (1973). Implantation, early placentation, and the chronology of embryogenesis in Tupaia belangeri. Z. Anat. Entwicklungsgesch. 142 315–340. 10.1007/BF00519135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kumar V., Hallstrom B. M., Janke A. (2013). Coalescent-based genome analyses resolve the early branches of the euarchontoglires. PLoS One 8:e60019. 10.1371/journal.pone.0060019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. LaMonica B. E., Lui J. H., Wang X., Kriegstein A. R. (2012). OSVZ progenitors in the human cortex: an updated perspective on neurodevelopmental disease. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22 747–753. 10.1016/j.conb.2012.03.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lewitus E., Kelava I., Huttner W. B. (2013). Conical expansion of the outer subventricular zone and the role of neocortical folding in evolution and development. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:424. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Li C. H., Yan L. Z., Ban W. Z., Tu Q., Wu Y., Wang L., et al. (2017). Long-term propagation of tree shrew spermatogonial stem cells in culture and successful generation of transgenic offspring. Cell Res. 27 241–252. 10.1038/cr.2016.156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lin J., Chen G., Gu L., Shen Y., Zheng M., Zheng W., et al. (2014). Phylogenetic affinity of tree shrews to Glires is attributed to fast evolution rate. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 71 193–200. 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Manabe N., Hirai S., Imai F., Nakanishi H., Takai Y., Ohno S. (2002). Association of ASIP/mPAR-3 with adherens junctions of mouse neuroepithelial cells. Dev. Dyn. 225 61–69. 10.1002/dvdy.10139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Marthiens V., Ffrench-Constant C. (2009). Adherens junction domains are split by asymmetric division of embryonic neural stem cells. EMBO Rep. 10 515–520. 10.1038/embor.2009.36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Martinez-Cerdeno V., Camacho J., Ariza J., Rogers H., Horton-Sparks K., Kreutz A., et al. (2017). The bat as a new model of cortical development. Cereb. Cortex 10.1093/cercor/bhx251 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Martinez-Cerdeno V., Cunningham C. L., Camacho J., Antczak J. L., Prakash A. N., Cziep M. E., et al. (2012). Comparative analysis of the subventricular zone in rat, ferret and macaque: evidence for an outer subventricular zone in rodents. PLoS One 7:e30178. 10.1371/journal.pone.0030178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Martinez-Cerdeno V., Noctor S. C., Kriegstein A. R. (2006). The role of intermediate progenitor cells in the evolutionary expansion of the cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 16(Suppl. 1), i152–i161. 10.1093/cercor/bhk017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. McEvilly R. J., De Diaz M. O., Schonemann M. D., Hooshmand F., Rosenfeld M. G. (2002). Transcriptional regulation of cortical neuron migration by POU domain factors. Science 295 1528–1532. 10.1126/science.1067132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Miyata T., Kawaguchi A., Saito K., Kawano M., Muto T., Ogawa M. (2004). Asymmetric production of surface-dividing and non-surface-dividing cortical progenitor cells. Development 131 3133–3145. 10.1242/dev.01173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Molyneaux B. J., Arlotta P., Menezes J. R., Macklis J. D. (2007). Neuronal subtype specification in the cerebral cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8 427–437. 10.1038/nrn2151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Montiel J. F., Vasistha N. A., Garcia-Moreno F., Molnar Z. (2016). From sauropsids to mammals and back: new approaches to comparative cortical development. J. Comp. Neurol. 524 630–645. 10.1002/cne.23871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Namba T., Huttner W. B. (2017). Neural progenitor cells and their role in the development and evolutionary expansion of the neocortex. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 6:e256. 10.1002/wdev.256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Neuhaus C. P. (2017). Ethical issues when modelling brain disorders in non-human primates. J. Med. Ethics 10.1136/medethics-2016-104088 [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Noctor S. C., Martinez-Cerdeno V., Ivic L., Kriegstein A. R. (2004). Cortical neurons arise in symmetric and asymmetric division zones and migrate through specific phases. Nat. Neurosci. 7 136–144. 10.1038/nn1172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Norton T. T., McBrien N. A. (1992). Normal development of refractive state and ocular component dimensions in the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri). Vision Res. 32 833–842. 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90026-F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Nowakowski T. J., Pollen A. A., Sandoval-Espinosa C., Kriegstein A. R. (2016). Transformation of the radial glia scaffold demarcates two stages of human cerebral cortex development. Neuron 91 1219–1227. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Osumi N., Shinohara H., Numayama-Tsuruta K., Maekawa M. (2008). Concise review: Pax6 transcription factor contributes to both embryonic and adult neurogenesis as a multifunctional regulator. Stem Cells 26 1663–1672. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Pilz G. A., Shitamukai A., Reillo I., Pacary E., Schwausch J., Stahl R., et al. (2013). Amplification of progenitors in the mammalian telencephalon includes a new radial glial cell type. Nat. Commun. 4:2125. 10.1038/ncomms3125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Pohlert T. (2014). The Pairwise Multiple Comparison of Mean Ranks Package (PMCMR). R Package. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=PMCMR [Google Scholar]
  70. Rakic P. (1972). Mode of cell migration to the superficial layers of fetal monkey neocortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 145 61–83. 10.1002/cne.901450105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Rakic P. (1995). A small step for the cell, a giant leap for mankind: a hypothesis of neocortical expansion during evolution. Trends Neurosci. 18 383–388. 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93934-P [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Reillo I., De Juan Romero C., Garcia-Cabezas M. A., Borrell V. (2011). A role for intermediate radial glia in the tangential expansion of the mammalian cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 21 1674–1694. 10.1093/cercor/bhq238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Remple M. S., Reed J. L., Stepniewska I., Kaas J. H. (2006). Organization of frontoparietal cortex in the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri). I. Architecture, microelectrode maps, and corticospinal connections. J. Comp. Neurol. 497 133–154. 10.1002/cne.20975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Remple M. S., Reed J. L., Stepniewska I., Lyon D. C., Kaas J. H. (2007). The organization of frontoparietal cortex in the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri): II. Connectional evidence for a frontal-posterior parietal network. J. Comp. Neurol. 501 121–149. 10.1002/cne.21226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Sauerland C., Menzies B. R., Glatzle M., Seeger J., Renfree M. B., Fietz S. A. (2018). The basal radial glia occurs in marsupials and underlies the evolution of an expanded neocortex in therian mammals. Cereb. Cortex 28 145–157. 10.1093/cercor/bhw360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Schehka S., Esser K. H., Zimmermann E. (2007). Acoustical expression of arousal in conflict situations in tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri). J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 193 845–852. 10.1007/s00359-007-0236-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Schehka S., Zimmermann E. (2009). Acoustic features to arousal and identity in disturbance calls of tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri). Behav. Brain Res. 203 223–231. 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9 676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Smart I. H., Dehay C., Giroud P., Berland M., Kennedy H. (2002). Unique morphological features of the proliferative zones and postmitotic compartments of the neural epithelium giving rise to striate and extrastriate cortex in the monkey. Cereb. Cortex 12 37–53. 10.1093/cercor/12.1.37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Song S., Liu L., Edwards S. V., Wu S. (2012). Resolving conflict in eutherian mammal phylogeny using phylogenomics and the multispecies coalescent model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 14942–14947. 10.1073/pnas.1211733109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Stancik E. K., Navarro-Quiroga I., Sellke R., Haydar T. F. (2010). Heterogeneity in ventricular zone neural precursors contributes to neuronal fate diversity in the postnatal neocortex. J. Neurosci. 30 7028–7036. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6131-09.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Sugitani Y., Nakai S., Minowa O., Nishi M., Jishage K., Kawano H., et al. (2002). Brn-1 and Brn-2 share crucial roles in the production and positioning of mouse neocortical neurons. Genes Dev. 16 1760–1765. 10.1101/gad.978002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Sur M., Weller R. E., Kaas J. H. (1980). Representation of the body surface in somatosensory area I of tree shrews, Tupaia glis. J. Comp. Neurol. 194 71–95. 10.1002/cne.901940105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Toma K., Hanashima C. (2015). Switching modes in corticogenesis: mechanisms of neuronal subtype transitions and integration in the cerebral cortex. Front. Neurosci. 9:274. 10.3389/fnins.2015.00274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Veit J., Bhattacharyya A., Kretz R., Rainer G. (2011). Neural response dynamics of spiking and local field potential activity depend on CRT monitor refresh rate in the tree shrew primary visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 106 2303–2313. 10.1152/jn.00388.2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Wang X., Tsai J. W., Lamonica B., Kriegstein A. R. (2011). A new subtype of progenitor cell in the mouse embryonic neocortex. Nat. Neurosci. 14 555–561. 10.1038/nn.2807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Washausen S., Obermayer B., Brunnett G., Kuhn H. J., Knabe W. (2005). Apoptosis and proliferation in developing, mature, and regressing epibranchial placodes. Dev. Biol. 278 86–102. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wong P., Kaas J. H. (2009a). An architectonic study of the neocortex of the short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica). Brain Behav. Evol. 73 206–228. 10.1159/000225381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wong P., Kaas J. H. (2009b). Architectonic subdivisions of neocortex in the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri). Anat. Rec. 292 994–1027. 10.1002/ar.20916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Workman A. D., Charvet C. J., Clancy B., Darlington R. B., Finlay B. L. (2013). Modeling transformations of neurodevelopmental sequences across mammalian species. J. Neurosci. 33 7368–7383. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5746-12.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Xiao J., Liu R., Chen C. S. (2017). Tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) as a novel laboratory disease animal model. Zool. Res. 38 127–137. 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2017.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Yamashita A., Fuchs E., Taira M., Yamamoto T., Hayashi M. (2012). Somatostatin-immunoreactive senile plaque-like structures in the frontal cortex and nucleus accumbens of aged tree shrews and Japanese macaques. J. Med. Primatol. 41 147–157. 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2012.00540.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Yao Y. G. (2017). Creating animal models, why not use the Chinese tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri chinensis)? Zool. Res. 38 118–126. 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2017.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (6.5MB, PDF)

Articles from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES