Abstract
Nuclear size and shape on histological specimens were used to quantify nuclear abnormality in gastric tubular tumors. A valid technique for this morphometrical analysis by image processing was developed. Furthermore, the present study examined the nuclear size and shape to determine if they were reliable criteria to be used for differential diagnosis. Nuclear area, maximum diameter and maximum width on the histological specimens were defined as factors to represent nuclear size. Nuclear aspect ratio represented nuclear shape. Histological features revealed varied degrees of condensation of nuclei; this was due to different protocols for preparing the histological specimens. This finding indicated that the size of intermediate lymphocytes on the same specimens should be measured as a control in order to estimate the degree of nuclear condensation. The present study also demonstrated that at least 200 nuclei should be measured on the histological specimens to obtain accurate nuclear size and shape. Histologically, the nuclei in benign tubular adenoma and borderline lesions tended to be spindle‐shaped, while those in well‐differentiated type tubular adenocarcinoma tended to be round and swollen. The nuclei in borderline lesions were larger than those in benign tubular adenoma and smaller than those in well‐differentiated type tubular adenocarcinoma. Our results for the above 4 factors corresponded well with these histological findings. The nuclear size and shape on histological specimens were concluded to be reliable criteria for assessing nuclear abnormality in gastric tubular tumors and useful ones for differential diagnosis.
Keywords: Key words, Gastric tumor, Morphometry, Nuclear abnormality
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (409.0 KB).
REFERENCES
- 1. ) Ishido , T. and Nakamura , K.Objective quantification of grade of atypia in epithelial tumors of the stomach by image processing . Jpn. J. Cancer Res. , 82 , 199 – 205 ( 1991. ). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. ) Ishido , T. , Yamaguchi , H. , Yoshida , S. , Tonouchi , S. and Nakamura , K.Morphometrical analysis of structural abnormality of tubular tumor of the stomach with image processing . Jpn. J. Cancer Res. , 82 , 1015 – 1021 ( 1991. ). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. ) Ishido , T. , Nishizawa , M. and Nakamura , K.Probability of malignancy based on numerification of histological atypicality and linear discriminant function in differentiating adenocarcinoma from intestinal type adenoma of the stomach: its application to biopsy interpretation . Stomach Intestine , 25 , 971 – 981 ( 1990. ) ( in Japanese ). [Google Scholar]
- 4. ) Tosi , P. , Baak , J. P. A. , Luzi , P. , Miracco , C. , Lio , R.and Barbini, P. Morphometric distinction of low‐ and high‐grade dysplasia in gastric biopsies . Hum. Pathol , 20 , 839 – 844 ( 1989. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. ) Tosi , P. , Luzi , P. , Baak , J. P. A. , Miracco , C. , Vindigni , C. , Lio , R. and Barbini , P.Gastric dysplasia: a stereological and morphometrical assessment . J. Pathol , 152 , 83 – 94 ( 1987. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. ) Jarvis , L. R. and Whitehead , R.Morphometric analysis of gastric dysplasia . J. Pathol , 147 , 133 – 138 ( 1985. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. ) Baak , J. P. A. and Derley , G. V.Borderline or malignant ovarian tumor? A case report of decision making with morphometry . J. Clin. Pathol , 37 , 1110 – 1113 ( 1984. ). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. ) Baak , J. P. A. , Van Dop , H. , Kurver , P. H. J. and Hermans , J.The value of morphometry to classic prognosticators in breast cancer . Cancer , 56 , 374 – 382 ( 1985. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. ) Boysen , M. and Reith , A.Discrimination of various epithelia by simple morphometric evaluation of the basal cell layer. A light microscopic analysis of pseudostratified, metaplastic and dysplastic nasal epithelium in nickel workers . Virchows Arch. B , 42 , 173 – 184 ( 1983. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. ) Eide , T. L.A morphometrical analysis of dysplasia in small adenomas of the large intestine . Virchows Arch. A , 410 , 119 – 124 ( 1986. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. ) Foraker , A. G. and Reagan , J. W.Nuclear size and nuclear: cytoplasmic ratio in the delineation of atypical hyperplasia of the uterine cervix . Cancer , 58 , 470 – 479 ( 1956. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. ) Graham , A. R. , Paplanus , S. H. and Bartels , P. H.Micro‐morphometry of colonic lesions . Lab. Invest , 59 , 397 – 402 ( 1988. ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. ) Kondo , F. , Hirooka , N. , Wada , K. and Kondo , T.Morphological clues for the diagnosis of small hepato‐cellular carcinomas . Virchows Arch. A , 411 , 15 – 21 ( 1987. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. ) Nakajyo , S. , Yamamoto , M. and Tahara , E.Morphometric analysis of gallbladder adenocarcinoma: discrimination between carcinoma and dysplasia . Virchows Arch. A , 416 , 133 – 140 ( 1989. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. ) Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer . “ The General Rules for the Gastric Cancer Study ,” 11th Ed. ( 1985. ). Kanehara Press; , Tokyo ( in Japanese ). [Google Scholar]