Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 2000 Oct;124(2):865–872. doi: 10.1104/pp.124.2.865

Gene Induction of Stilbene Biosynthesis in Scots Pine in Response to Ozone Treatment, Wounding, and Fungal Infection1

Hélène Chiron 1,1, Alain Drouet 1, François Lieutier 1, Hans-Dieter Payer 1, Dieter Ernst 1,*, Heinrich Sandermann Jr 1
PMCID: PMC59190  PMID: 11027734

Abstract

The S-adenosyl-l-methionine:pinosylvin-O-methyltransferase (PMT)2 gene was sequenced from Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). The open reading frame is arranged in two exons spaced by one 102-bp intron. Promoter regulatory elements such as two “CAAT” boxes and one “TATA” box were identified. Several cis-regulatory elements were recognized: stress-responsive elements (Myb-responsive elements) as well as G, H, and GC boxes. Moreover, elicitor-responsive elements (W boxes) and a sequence resembling the simian virus 40 enhancer core were found. In phloem and needles of control trees, the transcripts of stilbene synthase (STS) and PMT were hardly detectable. Increased ozone fumigation up to 0.3 μL L−1 enhanced the transcript level of STS and PMT in needles but not in healthy phloem. Wounding, e.g. mock inoculation, of stem-phloem was characterized by a transient increase in STS and PMT transcripts, which was more pronounced in the case of fungal inoculation. Combination of fungal-challenge or mock treatment with ozone resulted in a positive interaction at 0.3 μL L−1. Scots pine stilbene formation appeared to be induced via STS and PMT gene expression upon ozone and fungal stress as well as wounding. The broad stress-responsiveness is in agreement with the range of various cis-acting elements detected in the STS and PMT promoters.


In pine species, the constitutive stilbenes pinosylvin (PS), and pinosylvin monomethylether (PSM) occur exclusively in the heartwood (Kindl, 1985). However, both compounds are induced in the sapwood, phloem, and needles as a response to wounding or fungal attack (Hart, 1981; Kindl, 1985; Richter and Wild, 1992; Lieutier et al., 1996).

An increasing amount of data shows that some of the stilbenoid constituents may function as phytoalexins in seedlings (Schöppner and Kindl, 1979; Derks and Creasy, 1989). The formation of stilbenes can be induced in young plants of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) by UV light and stress (Schöppner and Kindl, 1979) by a minimum of 4 h of ozone exposure at 0.2 μL L−1 in primary needles (Rosemann et al., 1991) and by fungal attack in the phloem of adult pine trees (Lieutier et al., 1996). Stilbenes have been classified either as constitutive protectants preventing the decay of wood by microorganisms or as induced phytoalexins that protect phloem against bark beetles and other insects and against fungi symbiotically associated with pine beetles (Hart, 1981; Lieutier et al., 1996). The pathway to methoxystilbenes originates from l-Phe and includes the activities of Phe ammonialyase (PAL), stilbene synthase (STS), and pinosylvin methyltransferase (PMT). It has been shown that STS activity is the limiting factor in the pathway leading to PS and PSM (Schanz et al., 1992). Changes in gene expression of STS and/or PMT conceivably are a critical point in the induced resistance by stilbenoids.

There is little information on the transcriptional effects of simultaneous application of different stressors in plants, but exposure of plants to UV-B radiation or O3 may result in the induction of similar genes. In Scots pine seedlings, STS (and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase) mRNA levels have been reported to increase upon O3 fumigation (Zinser et al., 1998), and a pathogen-induced accumulation of STS mRNA has also been proven (Schwekendiek et al., 1992). The regulatory patterns are complex and may involve the differential induction of isoenzymes as described for PAL (Cramer et al., 1989) and the combinatorial interaction of several spatially separated promoter elements including exonic sequences (Hauffe et al., 1993).

After our previous report on the PMT cDNA sequence (Chiron et al., 1998) we now describe the pine PMT genomic sequence, including a 5′-flanking region and putative cis-regulatory elements that classify the enzyme as a typical member of the inducible phenylpropanoid pathway. Moreover, we report on changed STS and PMT mRNA levels upon O3 fumigation in needles as well as upon wounding and fungal inoculation in phloem. The latter treatments were also combined with O3 fumigation to highlight the sequential action of transactive factors in the regulation of stilbene biosynthetic genes.

RESULTS

PMT Gene Organization

A total of 1,908-bp DNA sequence covering exonic, intronic, and flanking sequences of the P. sylvestris PMT gene has been determined. The full nucleotide sequence is shown in Figure 1. To facilitate sequence numbering the first nucleotide of the 5′-non-coding region of the cDNA has been set as +1. Comparison of the genomic sequence with the PMT-cDNA sequence (Chiron et al., 1998) resulted in 100% identity in the 5′-non-coding region, whereas in the coding region two nucleotide exchanges were identified. They were located at positions 686 (T instead of C) and 953 (C instead of T) (numberings refer to Fig. 1). However, this resulted in no change of the deduced amino acid sequence. The PMT gene consisted of two coding exons and one intron region. The intron (102 bp) was in the range of the intron sizes commonly given (between 70 and thousands of nucleotides; Goodall and Filipowicz, 1991). The 5′-exon/intron and 3′-intron/exon boundaries conformed with the known GT/AG donor/acceptor site rule valid in both plants and animals (Brown, 1986). Upon closer inspection, the AG/GTA motif at the 5′-exon/intron splice junction was in accordance with the AG/GTAAG consensus. In addition, the intron contained the CAG/motif at the 3′-intron/exon splice junction in analogy to the TGCAG/G consensus for plant genes (Goodall and Filipowicz, 1991). The intron is AT rich (64%), which is essential for splicing (Goodall and Filipowicz, 1991). Inspection of upstream sequences showed conserved prokaryotic elements such as a catabolite activator protein (CAP) signal TCATTCGT at position −18, a TGATAAAAGCA motif at position −46 identified as a TATA box, and presumptive CAAT boxes located at positions −80 and −210.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Nucleotide sequence of the P. sylvestris PMT gene and deduced protein sequence. The predicted transcription start site is noted as +1. Conserved eukaryotic promoter elements (CAP signal, TATA, CAAT, and GC boxes) and putative plant regulatory elements (G and H boxes), as well as MREs are underlined. Elicitor regulatory elements (W boxes) are bold and simian virus 40 (SV40) enhancer is italic.

The Scots pine PMT promoter contained potential cis-elements. Myb-responsive elements (MRE) are located at position −121, −129, −194, −230, −310, and −358. The element ACTTACCACCCT at position −358 matched in 8 of 12 positions the consensus sequence T/ACTC/AACCTAC/ACC/A in UV-light and fungal-elicitor-induced plant gene promoters of the phenylpropanoid pathway (Lois et al., 1989). At positions −121 and −230, the (A+C)-rich motifs CCAACCACCTCC and CCAACCACTC matched a second consensus motif (CCAA/CCA/TAACC/TCC) in 10 and 9 of 12 positions, respectively (Lois et al., 1989). The element GTTG at position −194 was the inverse position of the core motif CAAC. Another motif, at position −129, TCCCATCTCC, matched in 9 of 10 positions the consensus of the box E (A/TCCCA/TT/ACA/TA/TG/C), which appears to be conserved in stress-inducible phenylpropanoid gene promoters (Grimmig and Matern, 1997).

Other regulatory cis-acting elements known to flavonoid and stilbene biosynthetic genes were also detected: G-box-like motifs (GTGG at positions −147 and −165, CACC at position −353) (Faktor et al., 1996); H-box-like motif CCATCC in inverse orientation (GGTAGG at position −140); GC box, GGGGCAGAAT (consensus G/TGGGCGGG/AG/AC/T), at position −72; elicitor-responsive elements, i.e. W boxes (ACTG at positions −55, −199, and −263, and TGAC at position −440) (Rushton and Somssich, 1998), and a SV40 enhancer core in inverse position (TTACCAC at position −356).

Stress Effects on Scots Pine

Single Ozone Treatment

In all reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR experiments only single bands were detected at 1.15 kb for PMT, 1.17 kb for STS, and 0.8 kb for chlorophyll a/b-binding protein (cab). RT-PCR controls performed with cab primers showed a steady-state level of cab transcripts in non-ozone fumigated tissues, and a decrease of these transcripts in tissues exposed to 0.15 and 0.3 μL L−1 ozone (data not shown). In control trees exposed to ozone-free air, STS and PMT transcripts were hardly detectable in needles (Fig. 2) and phloem (Figs. 3 and 4A). Two 10-h periods of ozone fumigation were sufficient to dramatically increase STS and PMT transcript levels in needles of Scots pine trees (Fig. 2). Exposure to 0.15 μL L−1 ozone resulted in a first peak of STS transcripts after 6 h of exposure followed by another increase 48 h after the onset of fumigation, whereas PMT transcripts remained at the control level until 24 h after the beginning of the treatment and only then began to accumulate. Exposure to 0.3 μL L−1 ozone led to a further increase of both transcript levels and remained at a high level in the needles (Fig. 2). In contrast STS and PMT mRNA levels in phloem were not significantly affected by ozone (Figs. 3 and 4A).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Induction of transcript levels of STS and PMT by ozone in Scots pine needles. RT-PCR was carried out on 5 μg of RNA isolated from needles at 0, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h after the beginning of ozone treatment (0, 0.15, and 0.3 μL L−1 ozone for 10 h per day during 2 d). RNA was isolated according to Kiefer et al. (2000). ●, PCR products in pine needles treated with 0 μL L−1 ozone; ▪, 0.15 μL L−1 ozone; and ▴, 0.3 μL L−1 ozone. Bars represent ± se (n = 3 trees; at least two samples per tree and two RT-PCR reactions per sample).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Indcution of mRNA levels of STS and PMT by ozone and fungus in Scots pine phloem. Pine trees were treated with ozone for 10 h/d, during 2 d. Then inoculations were performed with a 3-week-old culture of Leptographium wingfieldii (F) or with sterile malt agar (S). C, Controls without inoculations. RT-PCR was carried out on 5 μg RNA isolated from phloem at 2, 5, 9, and 16 d after onset of ozone fumigation. Ethidium bromide-stained RT-PCR products of three individual saplings are shown for each treatment.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Time course of changes in STS and PMT mRNA abundance. A, Transcript levels of STS and PMT in Scots pine phloem. Pine trees were treated with ozone (0.15 and 0.3 μL L−1 ozone for 10 h per day during 2 d). B, Induction of transcript levels of STS and PMT by ozone and wounding in Scots pine phloem. Sterile inoculations were performed at t = 2 d with 3-mm discs of sterile malt agar culture (indicated by an arrow). C, Induction of transcript levels of STS and PMT by ozone and fungus in Scots pine phloem. Pine saplings were fumigated with ozone (0.15 and 0.3 μL L−1 ozone for 10 h per day during 2 d). Fungal inoculations were performed at t = 2 d with 3-mm discs of a 3-week-old L. wingfieldii culture (indicated by an arrow). RT-PCR was carried out on 5 μg of RNA isolated from phloem at 2, 5, 9, and 16 d after beginning of ozone treatment. RNA was isolated according to Kiefer et al. (2000). ●, PCR products in pine phloem treated with 0 μL L−1 ozone; ▪, 0.15 μL L−1 ozone; and ▴, 0.3 μL L−1 ozone. Bars represent ± se (n = 3 trees; see Fig. 2).

Effects of Ozone Treatment on Wounding and Fungus Inoculation into Pine Phloem

A mock inoculation (Figs. 3 and 4B) led to the accumulation of both transcripts on d 5 (3 d after inoculation). STS mRNA displayed a progressive accumulation up to d 9 (120 ng ng−1 cDNA), then declined slowly, and was still at a high level after 16 d. PMT mRNA decreased progressively after d 5 (50 ng ng−1 cDNA) to reach the control level at the end of the experiment. The two kinetics in response to mock inoculation were strongly affected by a previous ozone treatment, and 0.15 μL L−1 ozone led to a dramatic decrease of STS mRNA response pattern. The PMT mRNA response curve was also lowered. A 0.3-μL L−1 ozone pretreatment resulted in the same 9-d peak of STS transcripts as mock inoculation alone but prolonged the accumulation until d 16. PMT transcripts showed a progressive accumulation until d 16 (75 ng ng−1 cDNA).

The fungus inoculation resulted in transient peaks of STS and PMT transcripts at 5 (200 ng ng−1 cDNA) and 9 (130 ng ng−1 cDNA) d after beginning of experiment, respectively (Figs. 3 and 4C). Ozone fumigation at 0.15 μL L−1 decreased slightly the peak of STS transcript accumulation, and delayed the peak of PMT transcripts until d 16 (110 ng ng−1 cDNA). Ozone fumigation of 0.3 μL L−1 prolonged the peak of STS to a steady-state level of 150 ng g−1 cDNA, whereas PMT transcript amount was still increasing 16 d after beginning of experiment at 170 ng g−1 cDNA. Fungus increased approximately 2-fold the peak of STS and PMT transcript amounts occurring in wounding with a 4-d earlier occurrence for STS. STS and PMT transcript amounts exhibited similar responses to ozone. At 0.15 μL L−1 a significant decrease occurred, whereas at 0.3 μL L−1 the peak level was prolonged or slightly increased.

DISCUSSION

PMT Gene

The genomic sequence matches the open-reading frame of the cDNA previously reported (Chiron et al., 1998), showing only two base changes that did not affect the polypeptide sequence. A possible discrepancy could be observed between the 5′-untranslated region reported for the cDNA and the genomic leader sequence since the CAP signal ended 10 bp upstream of the 5′-non-coding start of the cDNA. Consequently, the beginning of the cDNA could be 10 bp upstream and the TATA box would be located at −36, which is more consistent with its positions in walnut chalcone synthase (CHS) (−32) (Claudot et al., 1999), parsley caffeoyl-coenzyme A (CoA)-O-methyltransferase (CCoAOMT) (−32) (Grimmig and Matern, 1997), grapevine STS (−33) (Schubert et al., 1997), and parsley PAL (−30) (Logemann et al., 1995).

The characterization of the promoter allows the determination of potential cis-regulatory elements that are possibly related to the rapid transient accumulation of PMT mRNA by treatment of pine with ozone and fungal elicitor. Genes encoding PAL, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase, and 4-coumarate-CoA ligase (4CL) are well known to be largely controlled at the level of transcription and to be coordinately expressed in response to both developmental and environmental stimuli in many plant species. Members of the Myb family are involved in the regulation of these phenylpropanoid genes (Rushton and Somssich, 1998).

MREs were located in Scots pine PMT promoter at positions −121, −129, −194, −230, −310, and −358 (Fig. 1). The MREs at positions −358, −310, and −230 have been described in parsley as boxes L, A, and P, respectively for nearly all known PAL and 4CL genes (Logemann et al., 1995) and also in parsley CCoAOMT genes (Grimmig and Matern, 1997). These elements alone, or the promoter region containing all of them together, failed to confer elicitor or light responsiveness of a reporter gene in transient expression assays. Consequently these elements appear to be necessary but not sufficient for elicitor or light-mediated PAL and 4CL gene activation (Logemann et al., 1995). Moreover, no example of a gene outside those involved in general phenylpropanoid metabolism, whose promoter contains a complete set of all three boxes, is reported, further supporting their functional importance in the coordinate regulation of these genes.

A G box located proximal to the TATA box is a widely dispersed sequence motif in eukaryotic promoters. G boxes were present in Scots pine PMT promoter at positions −147 and −165 and in an inverse orientation at position −353. Plant G box or its core ACGT motif has been reported to bind different nuclear factors. Functional analysis of plant promoters has demonstrated the role of the G box in promoter activation by various signals including light, abscisic acid, and UV light (Faktor et al., 1996). The conservation of both G box and H box between TATA and G boxes in different CHS promoters emphasizes their importance as regulatory motifs (Faktor et al., 1996). One H box is present in Scots pine promoter in an inverse orientation at position −140 between TATA and G boxes. Both G and H boxes were found in the proximal region of the promoters of a number of genes encoding phenylpropanoid biosynthetic enzymes, including PAL, 4CL, and CHS (Zhu et al., 1996). G box and H box located near the TATA box were described to be both essential for floral expression (Faktor et al., 1996). G boxes are involved in the regulation of diverse genes by developmental- and pathogen-derived signals as well as abcisic acid, light, UV irradiation, wounding, as well as pathogen signals. The H box has a much more restricted distribution, being characteristic of phenylpropanoid biosynthetic gene promoters (Zhu et al., 1996). G box and H boxes, in combination, are necessary and apparently sufficient for feed-forward stimulation by 4-coumaric acid (Loake et al., 1992). The H box is also present in the parsley CHS and PAL promoters, and functional analysis indicates that this cis-element is involved in UV induction (Loake et al., 1992). Enhancer or activator elements dramatically increase the transcriptional activity of certain eukaryotic genes. A copy of the SV40 enhancer core sequence is found at position −356 in the PMT promoter. Such enhancer sequences were previously reported from the promoters of Phaseolus vulgaris PAL genes (Cramer et al., 1989) and parsley CCoAOMT (Grimmig and Matern, 1997).

Recently, elicitor responsive elements (W boxes) TTGACC have been reported (Raventós et al., 1995; Rushton et al., 1996). Such W boxes are present at position −440 and in an inverse orientation at positions −55, −199, and −263 in the PMT promoter (Fig. 1). Elicitor responsive element-like sequences occur in the promoter of different defense-related genes, including PR1 of parsley (Rushton et al., 1996), in the CHS promoter of maize (Franken et al., 1991), and in the STS promoter of grapevine (Schubert et al., 1997; Ernst et al., 1999). Elicitor responsive elements may be quite universally responsible for the induction of plant defense pathways.

In the grapevine STS promoter, the ozone responsive region (−430 to −280) differs from the pathogen responsive region (−280 to −140) (Schubert et al., 1997; Ernst et al., 1999). In the Scots pine PMT promoter, W boxes were more abundant in the region between −263 and −50. Comparison of the ozone responsive STS promoter region did not reveal a strong sequence similarity to the PMT promoter. This has also been found for a senescence-associated gene promoter in Arabidopsis (Miller et al., 1999). Therefore, the presence of possible ozone responsive elements has still to be proven. Taken together the similarities of motifs found in the pine PMT and grapevine STS promoters may indicate interactions of several cis-elements in the ozone- and pathogen-induced transcript levels of stilbene biosynthetic genes.

PMT and STS Induction by Ozone and Fungal Pathogen

The dose-dependent ozone induction accumulation of STS and PMT transcripts in needles (Fig. 2) is in good accordance with previously found increases of stilbene contents, STS and PMT enzyme activities, and STS transcripts in Scots pine seedlings (Rosemann et al., 1991; Zinser et al., 1998). Comparison of all these data suggests that stilbene metabolites seemed to be regulated at the transcriptional level.

Ozone did not induce STS and PMT mRNA in phloem, indicating no systemic ozone effect (Figs. 3 and 4A). Similarly, in non-mycorrhizal roots of Scots pine seedlings, no ozone effect on stilbene metabolites was found (Bonello et al., 1993).

Wounding led to transient inductions of STS and PMT transcripts (Figs. 3 and 4B), which are increased by fungus during the first week after inoculation (Figs. 3 and 4C). The stilbenes PS and PSM were detected in reaction zone only in phloem wounded or inoculated by a bark-beetle associated fungus, in agreement with the proposed stilbene involvement of tree resistance (Lieutier et al., 1996; Bois and Lieutier, 1997). Ozone resulted in transient STS and PMT mRNA increases in needles (Fig. 2), thus illustrating similarities between ozone- and pathogen-induced transcript increase.

Combined Stress

The impact of simultaneous environmental stresses on plants is not well known. Both positive and negative interactions seem to exist among different stress factors with regard to gene expression (Örvar et al., 1997; Xiong et al., 1999). When applied before wounding or fungal attack, 0.15 μL L−1 ozone decreased pine STS and PMT transient induction, whereas 0.3 μL L−1 ozone restored and prolonged the induction level over 2 weeks (Fig. 4, B and C). As in Scots pine PMT is present as a multigene family (Chiron et al., 1998), different members of the family might be differentially regulated upon environmental stimuli. There also could be a competition between induction and degradation of transcripts leading to the steady state level measured, or different levels of stress might affect the balance differently. Nevertheless, this different effect of the two ozone concentrations applied requires further investigations. Similar contrary reactions have been reported for birch clones exposed to ozone and/or drought interactions (Pääkkönen et al., 1998) as well as for Heterobasidion-challenged roots of ozone-treated Scots pine seedlings (Bonello et al., 1993). It is interesting that a systemic ozone effect on stilbene metabolites in roots of Scots pine seedlings was found only in pathogen-challenged seedlings (Bonello et al., 1993), similar as found in this report in the phloem of Scots pine saplings. Future experiments should focus on determining such complex interactions of ozone with various abiotic/biotic stress factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant and Fungal Material

Seven-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) saplings were purchased from the Bauchery nursery (Crouy-sur-Cosson, Loir et Cher, France) and were further cultivated for 5 months under a pergola. After the experimental treatments, the trees were transferred back to the pergola, and 1 year later the rate of survival was determined. L. wingfieldii was from the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique collection (Orléans, France), and was initially isolated from the bark beetle Tomicus piniperda and its galleries. It was purified by monospore culture and cultivated on malt-agar at 22°C in dark (Lieutier et al., 1989). Cultures were preserved at 4°C with a yearly passage on Scots pine logs at 22°C to retain their activity.

Ozone Treatment

In April 1998, saplings were acclimated for 6 d in the GSF phytotron walk-in chambers (Neuherberg, Germany; Thiel et al., 1996). The light period was 14 h d−1 (1,300 μE m−2 s−1 photosynthetically active radiation; 22.5 W m−2 UV-A; 0.45 minimum erythemal dose h−1 UV-B); day/night temperatures were 22°C/16°C and day/night relative humidities were 70%/85%. Saplings were fumigated with ozone (0.15 or 0.3 μL L−1) for 10 h per day during 2 d.

Inoculations

Forty-eight hours after the beginning of ozone fumigation, two sterile and two fungal inoculations were carried out onto every tree in each chamber. Calibrated agar discs (3-mm diameter) of a 3-week-old sporulating L. wingfieldii culture were introduced into the tree at the cambium level, according to a method described by Wright (1933). Mock inoculations without fungus were performed with 3-mm diameter sterile malt agar discs. Inoculations were made at two different levels of the trunk with a distant of at least 20 cm. A 4 (horizontal) × 7-cm (vertical) rectangle of phloem tissue was removed around each inoculation site and used for RNA analysis after discarding a 1 × 2-cm rectangle of phloem tissue directly enclosing the inoculation point.

Nucleic Acid Isolation

Lyophilized needles (70–90 mg), omitting the current year flush and lyophilized phloem tissue (100 mg), were ground to a fine powder, and total RNA was isolated as described (Kiefer et al., 2000). Genomic DNA was extracted from adult Scots pine needles according to protocol 1 in Csaikl et al. (1998).

PMT Genomic Clone Isolation

The promoter sequence was obtained using gene specific reverse primers designed from the PMT cDNA sequence (Chiron et al., 1998), according to the method described by Cormack and Somssich (1997), and 1.5 μg of Scots pine genomic DNA was completely digested with 20 units EcoRI. The DNA was precipitated 5 min on ice with 2 volumes of isopropanol, washed with 70% (v/v) ethanol, and resuspended in 15 μL H2O. After a 5-min incubation at 90°C, the DNA was polyadenylated with 0.5 mm dATP and 1.5 mm CoCl2 in 20 μL of terminal transferase (TdT) buffer (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) containing 50 units of TdT at 37°C for 1.5 h. The reaction was stopped by heating the sample at 72°C for 5 min.

The first PCR was performed with 1/10 volume of the polyadenylated DNA (150 ng), 100 pmol of gene specific primer 1 (5′-TCCCGAGTTCCATGCCCAGAA-3′), 100 pmol of universal-T17 primer (5′-GTAAAACGACGGCCAGTCGACTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT-3′), 200 μm dNTPs, and 5 units of AGSGold DNA polymerase (AGS) in 100 μL of 1 × AGSGold buffer with thermal cycling conditions consisting of an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles of 1-min denaturation at 94°C, 1-min primer annealing at 60°C, and 3-min extension at 72°C, with a final 10-min extension period at 72°C.

The second PCR was carried out using 1 μL of the first PCR product, under the same conditions as the first PCR except that 100 pmol of gene specific primer 2 (5′-GCCGATCCCATTTCGAATCC-3′) and 100 pmol of universal primer (5′-GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′) were used. The final PCR product was purified and cloned into pGEM-T vector (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The plasmids were sequenced commercially (MWG, Ebersberg, Germany).

RT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA (5 μg) from pine needles or phloem tissue was DNaseI digested and reverse transcribed for 1 h at 42°C by 200 units SuperscriptII RT (Life Technologies/Gibco-BRL, Cleveland), with 1× corresponding buffer, 10 mm dithiothreitol, 0.4 mm each dNTP, 100 nm oligo(dT)12–18 primer (Life Technologies/Gibco-BRL), and 10 units RNase inhibitor (Life Technologies/Gibco-BRL).

The cDNA was quantified according to a method described by Kiefer et al. (2000) and 10 ng were used for PCR with 2.5 units Taq polymerase (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany), 1× corresponding buffer, 0.2 mm each dNTP, and 0.2 μm 3′ and 5′ primers. Amplification was performed during 35 cycles of 1-min denaturation at 94°C, 1-min primer annealing at 58°C (PMT and cab primers) or 62°C (STS primers), and 2-min elongation at 72°C. Reaction products were analyzed by electrophoresis through a 1% (w/v) agarose gel, visualized under UV-light after ethidium bromide staining, and quantified using the Picogreen method (Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands). The authenticity of the PCR products was checked by two directional partial sequencing using the Thermo Sequenase Kit (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Evi Kiefer for helpful assistance, Werner Heller and Dieter Treutter (Technical University of Munich) for excellent cooperation, and Franck Brignolas (University of Orléans) for critical reading of the manuscript. We are grateful to the staff of the GSF phytotron for their excellent technical assistance.

Footnotes

1

This work was supported by the European Community (grant no. FAIR–BM–955721 to H.C.) and in part by EUROSILVA and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant no. SFB 607).

2

A patent application has been filed for the PMT gene (Deutsche Patentanmeldung no. 10006204.0).

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Bois E, Lieutier F. Phenolic response of Scots pine clones to inoculation with Leptographium wingfieldii, a fungus associated with Tomicus piniperda. Plant Physiol Biochem. 1997;35:819–825. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonello P, Heller W, Sandermann H. Ozone effects on root-disease susceptibility and defense responses in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) New Phytol. 1993;124:653–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03855.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown JWS. A catalogue of slice junction and putative branch point sequences from plant introns. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986;14:9549–9559. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.24.9549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chiron H, Drouet A, Heller W, Ernst D, Sandermann H, inventors. August 13, 1998. DNA-Sequenz der Pinosylsvin-3-O-methyltransferase (PMT). Deutsches Patentamt A-Nr 198 36 774.0
  5. Claudot A-C, Ernst D, Sandermann H, Drouet A. Cloning and characterization of two members of the chalcone synthase gene family from walnut. Plant Physiol Biochem. 1999;37:721–730. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cormack RS, Somssich IE. Rapid amplification of genomic ends (RAGE) as a simple method to clone flanking genomic DNA. Gene. 1997;194:273–276. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00205-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cramer CL, Edwards K, Dron M, Liang X, Dildine SL, Bolwell GP, Dixon RA, Lamb CJ, Schuch W. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene organization and structure. Plant Mol Biol. 1989;12:367–383. doi: 10.1007/BF00017577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Csaikl UM, Bastian H, Brettschneider R, Gaush S, Meir A, Schauerte M, Scholz F, Sperisen C, Vornam B, Ziegenhagen B. Comparative analysis of different DNA extraction protocols: a fast, universal maxi-preparation of high quality plant DNA for genetic evaluation and phylogenetic studies. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1998;16:69–86. [Google Scholar]
  9. Derks W, Creasy LL. The significance of stilbene phytoalexins in the Plasmopara viticola-grapevine interaction. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 1989;34:189–202. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ernst D, Grimmig B, Heidenreich B, Schubert R, Sandermann H., Jr . Ozone-induced genes: mechanisms and biotechnological applications. In: Smallwood MS, Calvert CM, Bowles DJ, editors. Plant Responses to Environmental Stress. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers; 1999. pp. 33–41. [Google Scholar]
  11. Faktor O, Kooter JM, Dixon RA, Lamb CJ. Functional dissection of a bean chalcone synthase gene promoter in transgenic tobacco plants reveals sequence motifs essential for floral expression. Plant Mol Biol. 1996;32:849–859. doi: 10.1007/BF00020482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Franken P, Niesbach-Klösgen U, Weydemann U, Maréchal-Drouart L, Saedler H, Wienand U. The duplicated chalcone synthase genes C2 and Whp (white pollen) of Zea mays are independently regulated: evidence for translational control of Whp expression by the anthocyanin intensifying gene. EMBO J. 1991;10:2605–2612. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07802.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Goodall GJ, Filipowicz W. Different effects of intron nucleotide composition and secondary structure on pre-mRNA splicing in monocot and dicot plants. EMBO J. 1991;10:2635–2644. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07806.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grimmig B, Matern U. Structure of the parsley caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase gene, harbouring a novel elicitor responsive cis-acting element. Plant Mol Biol. 1997;33:323–341. doi: 10.1023/a:1005780529457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hart JH. Role of phytostilbenes in decay and disease resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1981;19:437–458. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hauffe KD, Lee SP, Subramaniam R, Douglas CJ. Combinatorial interactions between positive and negative cis-acting elements control spatial patterns of 4CL-1 expression in transgenic tobacco. Plant J. 1993;4:235–253. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.04020235.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kiefer E, Heller W, Ernst D. A simple and efficient protocol for isolation of functional RNA from plant tissues rich in secondary metabolites. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2000;18:33–39. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kindl H. Higuchi T, ed, Biosynthesis and Biodegradation of Wood Components. London: Academic Press; 1985. Biosynthesis of stilbenes; pp. 349–377. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lieutier F, Sauvard D, Brignolas F, Picron V, Yart A, Bastien C, Jay-Allemand C. Changes in phenolic metabolites of Scots pine phloem induced by Ophiostoma brunneo-ciliatum, a bark beetle-associated fungus. Eur J For Pathol. 1996;26:145–158. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lieutier F, Yart A, Garcia J, Ham MC, Morelet M, Levieux J. Champignons phytopathogènes associés à deux coléoptères Scolytidae du pin sylvestre (Pinus sylvestris L.) et étude préliminaire de leur agressivité envers l'hôte. Ann Sci For. 1989;46:201–216. [Google Scholar]
  21. Loake GJ, Faktor O, Lamb CJ, Dixon RA. Combination of H-box [CCTACC(N)7CT] and G box (CACGTG) cis elements is necessary for feed-forward stimulation of a chalcone synthase promoter by the phenylpropanoid-pathway intermediate p-coumaric acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:9230–9234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.19.9230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Logemann E, Parniske M, Hahlbrock K. Modes of expression and common structural features of the complete phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene family in parsley. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:5905–5909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.13.5905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lois R, Dietrich A, Hahlbrock K, Schulz W. A phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene from parsley: structure, regulation and identification of elicitor and light responsive cis-acting elements. EMBO J. 1989;8:1641–1648. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03554.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller JD, Arteca RN, Pell EJ. Senescence-associated gene expression during ozone-induced leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 1999;120:1015–1023. doi: 10.1104/pp.120.4.1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Örvar BL, McPherson J, Ellis BE. Pre-activating wounding response in tobacco prior to high-level ozone exposure prevents necrotic injury. Plant J. 1997;11:203–212. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.11020203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pääkkönen E, Seppänen S, Holopainen T, Kokko H, Kärenlampi S, Kärenlampi L, Kangasjärvi J. Induction of genes for the stress proteins PR-10 and PAL in realtion to growth, visible injuries and stomatal conductance in birch (Betula pendula) clones exposed to ozone and/or drought. New Phytol. 1998;138:295–305. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00898.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Raventós D, Jensen AB, Rask M-B, Casacuberta JM, Mundy J, San Segundo B. A 20-bp cis-elements is both necessary and sufficient to mediate elicitor response of a maize Prms gene. Plant J. 1995;7:147–155. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1995.07010147.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Richter C, Wild A. Phenolic compounds in needles of Norway spruce trees in relation to novel forest decline: I. Studies on trees from site of the Northern Black Forest. Biochem Biophys Pflanz. 1992;188:305–320. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rosemann D, Heller W, Sandermann H. Biochemical plant responses to ozone: II. Induction of stilbene biosynthesis in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1991;97:1280–1286. doi: 10.1104/pp.97.4.1280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rushton PJ, Somssich IE. Transcriptional control of plant genes responsive to pathogens. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1998;1:311–315. doi: 10.1016/1369-5266(88)80052-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rushton PJ, Torres JT, Parniske M, Wernert P, Hahlbrock K, Somssich IE. Interaction of elicitor-inducible DNA-binding proteins with elicitor response elements in the promoters of parsley PR1 genes. EMBO J. 1996;15:5690–5700. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schanz S, Schröder G, Schröder J. Stilbene synthase from Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) FEBS Lett. 1992;313:71–74. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)81187-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schöppner A, Kindl H. Stilbene synthase (pinosylvin synthase) and its induction by ultraviolet light. FEBS Lett. 1979;108:349–352. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(79)80561-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schubert R, Fischer R, Hain R, Schreier PH, Bahnweg G, Ernst D, Sandermann H., Jr An ozone-responsive region of the grapevine resveratrol synthase promoter differs from the basal pathogen-responsive sequence. Plant Mol Biol. 1997;34:417–426. doi: 10.1023/a:1005830714852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schwekendiek A, Pfeffer G, Kindl H. Pine stilbene synthase cDNA, a tool for probing environmental stress. FEBS Lett. 1992;301:41–44. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80206-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Thiel S, Döhring T, Köfferlein M, Kosak A, Martin P, Seidlitz HK. A phytotron for plant stress research: how far can artificial lighting compare to natural sunlight? J Plant Physiol. 1996;148:456–463. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wright E. A cork-borer method for inoculating trees. Phytopathology. 1933;23:487–488. [Google Scholar]
  38. Xiong L, Ishitani M, Zhu J-K. Interaction of osmotic stress, temperature and abscisic acid in the regulation of gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 1999;119:205–211. doi: 10.1104/pp.119.1.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhu Q, Dröge-Laser W, Dixon RA, Lamb C. Transcriptional activation of plant defense genes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1996;6:624–630. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(96)80093-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zinser C, Ernst D, Sandermann H. Induction of stilbene synthase and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase mRNAs in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings. Planta. 1998;204:169–176. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES