Table 4.
Reference | Ethnic Density Measure(s) |
Dataset | Sample | Outcome(s) | Association | Main Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
Black neighborhood | ||||||
| ||||||
Cooper (1997)13 | % Black | 329 US counties (1989–1991) | 148,947 Medicare beneficiaries with colorectal cancer aged 65+ years | 2-year mortality among CRC cases | + | As % Blacks in the county increased, 2-year mortality rates for both White and Black patients increased |
| ||||||
Russell (2011)47 | % Black | GA Cancer Registry (1999–2003) | 15,256 Black and White women with breast cancer | Breast cancer- specific mortality | + | Increasing % Black residents was associated with higher breast cancer-specific mortality for all women |
| ||||||
Russell (2012)48 | % Black; | GA Cancer Registry (1999–2003) | 20,088 Black and White women with breast cancer | Breast cancer- specific and all-cause mortality | + | Increasing % Black residents was associated with higher all-cause mortality for White (but not Black) women. |
Theil Index | Increasing segregation was associated with higher breast cancer-specific mortality for Black (but not White) women. | |||||
| ||||||
Warner (2010)8 | % Black; | CA Cancer Registry (1996–2004) | 8,482 non-Hispanic Black and 95,672 NHW women with breast cancer | Breast cancer- specific and all-cause mortality | + (Whites) | Among Whites, living in neighborhoods with greater % Blacks was associated with higher all-cause mortality. Among Blacks, living in neighborhoods with ≥20% Blacks was associated with lower breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. Protective effect was observed across most segregation measures. |
Dissimilarity; | — (Blacks) | |||||
Delta; | ||||||
Isolation; | ||||||
Relative centralization; | ||||||
Spatial proximity | ||||||
| ||||||
Lim (2011)49 | % Black | Los Angeles County Cancer Registry (1997- 2003) | 1811 women with cervical cancer | Cervical cancer-specific mortality | + | Living in neighborhoods with a high proportion of Black households was associated with increased risk of death |
% Hispanic | ||||||
% Asian | ||||||
| ||||||
Pruitt (2015)10 | Location quotient | TX Cancer Registry (1995–2009) | 109,749 Black, Hispanic, and White women with breast cancer aged 50+ yrs | Breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality | + | Among all women, higher Black segregation was associated with greater all-cause mortality. |
In analyses stratified by patient race/ethnicity, greater segregation was not associated with greater mortality among Blacks. | ||||||
| ||||||
Bemanian (2017)11 | Location quotient | WI Cancer Reporting System (2002–2011) | 7,164 White, 940 Black, and 252 Hispanic women with breast cancer | Breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality | — | In race-stratified analyses, Black patients residing in areas of high Black isolation had lower breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. |
Local exposure & isolation (Lex/Is) | ||||||
Index of concentration at extremes (ICE) | ||||||
| ||||||
Zhou (2017)12 | Location quotient | WI Cancer Reporting System (2002–2011) | 4,699 Whites and 682 Blacks with colorectal cancer | Colorectal cancer-specific and all-cause survival | No association | |
| ||||||
Haas (2008)50 | Isolation index | SEER-Medicare (1992–2002) | 47,866 White, Black, and Hispanic women with breast cancer aged 66–85 yrs | Breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality | No association | |
| ||||||
Johnson (2016)52 | Isolation index | GA Comprehensive Cancer Registry (2000–2009) | 8,322 White and Black early-stage non-small cell lung cancer cases | Lung cancer mortality | + (Blacks) | High segregation and high economic deprivation were associated with greater mortality among Blacks, but not among Whites |
NA (Whites) | ||||||
| ||||||
Hayanga (2013)51 | Dissimilarity index | SEER registry (2003–2007) | Black and White populations per US county | Race-specific lung cancer mortality rates by county | + (Blacks) | Dissimilarity index was associated with greater lung cancer mortality for Blacks, but lower mortality for Whites |
— (Whites) | ||||||
| ||||||
Hispanic neighborhood | ||||||
| ||||||
Pruitt (2015)10 | Location quotient | TX Cancer Registry (1995–2009) | 109,749 Black, Hispanic, and White women with breast cancer aged 50+ yrs | Breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality | + | Among all women, higher Hispanic segregation was associated with greater breast cancer-specific and greater all-cause mortality. |
In analyses stratified by patient race/ethnicity, greater segregation was not associated with greater mortality among Hispanics. | ||||||
| ||||||
Bemanian (2017)11 | Location quotient | WI Cancer Reporting System (2002–2011) | 7,164 White, 940 Black, and 252 Hispanic women with breast cancer | Breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality | + | Local Hispanic isolation was associated with greater overall mortality for all women. |
Local exposure & isolation (Lex/Is) | ||||||
Index of concentration at extremes (ICE) | ||||||
| ||||||
Haas (2008)50 | Isolation index | SEER-Medicare (1992–2002) | 47,866 White, Black, and Hispanic women with breast cancer aged 66–85 yrs | Breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality | No association | |
| ||||||
Pruitt (2016)53 | % Hispanic | TX Cancer Registry (1995–2009) | 166,254 NHW and Hispanic women with breast cancer | Breast cancer- specific and all-cause mortality | + | Residing in higher Hispanic density neighborhoods was generally associated with higher all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality, although associations differed slightly by ethnicity and birthplace. |
| ||||||
Lim (2011)49 | % Black | Los Angeles County Cancer Registry (1997- 2003) | 1811 women with cervical cancer | Cervical cancer-specific mortality | No association | |
% Hispanic | ||||||
% Asian | ||||||
| ||||||
Keegan (2010)15 | Enclave index | CA Cancer Registry (1988 – 2005) | 37,695 Hispanic women with breast cancer | Breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality | No association | |
| ||||||
Banegas (2014)54 | Enclave index | CA Cancer Registry (2005–2010) | 16,380 Hispanic women with breast cancer | Breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality | No association | |
| ||||||
Patel (2013)55 | Enclave index | CA Cancer Registry (1998–2007) | 14,280 NHWs and Hispanics with lung cancer | Lung cancer-specific and all-cause mortality | Birthplace × enclave interaction | The association between birthplace and survival differed by enclave residence, with a protective effect of foreign-birth observed only among cases living in high enclave/low SES neighborhoods |
| ||||||
Schupp (2014)56 | Enclave index | CA Cancer Registry (1996–2004) | 35,427 Hispanic men with prostate cancer | Prostate cancer-specific survival | Birthplace × enclave interaction | Foreign-born Hispanics had significantly better survival, but ethnic enclave modified this effect, with the survival advantage being more pronounced in the high enclave compared with low enclave neighborhoods. |
| ||||||
Gomez (2015)14 | Enclave index | CA Cancer Registry (1994–2009) | 7958 Hispanic women with cervical cancer | Cervical cancer-specific mortality | Birthplace × enclave interaction | The association between birthplace and survival differed by enclave residence, with a protective effect of foreign-birth observed only among cases living in high enclave settings. |
| ||||||
Asian neighborhood | ||||||
| ||||||
Gomez (2010)57 | Enclave index | CA Cancer Registry (1988 – 2005) | 20,747 Asian women with breast cancer | Breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality | No association | |
| ||||||
Lim (2011)49 | % Black | Los Angeles County Cancer Registry (1997- 2003) | 1811 women with cervical cancer | Cervical cancer-specific mortality | No association | |
% Hispanic | ||||||
% Asian | ||||||
| ||||||
Unspecified neighborhood | ||||||
| ||||||
Keegan (2014)58 | % Immigrant | Neighborhoods and Breast Cancer Study (NABC), northern CA | 4,345 women with breast cancer | Breast cancer- specific and all-cause mortality | — | Residing in neighborhoods with more foreign-born residents was associated with lower breast cancer-specific mortality. |
Note:
In this column, we use “+” to indicate findings in which greater ethnic density was associated with higher mortality, whereas “—” is used to denote findings in which greater ethnic density was associated with lower mortality.