Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Japanese Journal of Cancer Research : Gann logoLink to Japanese Journal of Cancer Research : Gann
. 1996 Nov;87(11):1125–1133. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1996.tb03122.x

Analysis of Synergism in Hepatocarcinogenesis Based on Preneoplastic Foci Induction by 10 Heterocyclic Amines in the Rat

Ryohei Hasegawa 1, Isao Yoshimura 3, Katsumi Imaida 1, Nobuyuki Ito 2, Tomoyuki Shirai 1
PMCID: PMC5921017  PMID: 9045941

Abstract

The effects of simultaneous treatment with 5 or 10 heterocyclic amines at low dose levels on hepatocarcinogenesis in rats were investigated using a medium‐term liver bioassay protocol based on the two‐stage carcinogenesis hypothesis with diethylnitrosamine initiation (200 mg/kg, i.p.). Five carcinogenic heterocyclic amines in experiment 1 (Trp‐P‐1, Glu‐P‐2, IQ, MelQ, MelQx) and experiment 2 (Trp‐P‐2, Glu‐P‐1, MeAαC, AαC, PhIP) were administered together or individually in the diet at levels of 1/1, 1/5, or 1/25 careinogenic doses, and all 10 chemicals were given at 1/10 or 1/100 levels in experiment 3. Induction of preneoplastic glutathione S‐transferase placental form (GST‐P)‐positive foci in the liver was generally increased in the combination groups over the sums of the 5 or 10 individual effects. Thus, based on the heteroadditive concept, synergism was observed for each combination, being most obvious in the group given all 10 chemicals at the 1/10 dose levels. However, the values for the combined groups were generally close to the averages of the 5 or 10 data gained for the heterocyclic amines alone at the corresponding higher doses, indicating the possibility of isoadditivity. Based on these findings, we propose here a new statistical method for analysis of combined effects of multiple chemicals, and, using this, we demonstrated (true) synergism with some heterocyclic amine combinations. The importance of dose‐response curves for evaluation of combination effects is discussed.

Keywords: Synergism, Statistical analysis, Hepatocarcinogenesis, Heterocyclic amine, GST‐P‐positive foci, Rat

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (503.8 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1. ) Doll , R.Epidemiology and the prevention of cancer: some recent developments . J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. , 114 , 447 – 458 ( 1988. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. ) Sugimura , T.Multistep carcinogenesis: a perspective . Science , 258 , 603 – 607 ( 1992. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. ) Vainio , H. , Sorsa , M. and McMichael , A. J.“Complex Mixtures and Cancer Risk,” IARC Scientific Publications, No. 104 ( 1990. ). IARC; , Lyon . [Google Scholar]
  • 4. ) Mumtaz , M. M. , Sipes , I. G. , Clewell , H. J. and Yang , R. S. H.Risk assessment of chemical mixtures: biologic and toxicologic issues . Fund. Appl. Toxicol. , 21 , 258 – 269 ( 1993. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. ) Weisburger , J. H.Heterocyclic amines in cooked foods: possible human carcinogens . Cancer Res. , 53 , 2422 – 2424 ( 1993. ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. ) Felton , J. S. and Knize , M. G.Occurrence, identification, and potential mutagenicity of heterocyclic amines in cooked food . Mutat. Res. , 259 , 205 – 217 ( 1991. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. ) Layton , D. W. , Bogen , K. T. , Knize , M. K. , Hatch , F. T. , Johnson , V. M. and Felton , J. S.Cancer risk of heterocyclic amines in cooked food: an analysis and implications for research . Carcinogenesis , 16 , 39 – 52 ( 1995. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. ) Wakabayashi , K. , Nagao , M. , Esumi , H. and Sugimura , T.Food‐derived mutagens and carcinogens . Cancer Res. , 52 , 2092s – 2098s ( 1992. ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. ) Ito , N. , Hasegawa , R. , Sano , M. , Tamano , S. , Esumi , H. , Takayama , S. and Sugimura , T.A new colon and mammary carcinogen in cooked food, 2‐amino‐l‐methyl‐6‐phenylimidazo[4,5‐b]pyridine (PhIP) . Carcinogenesis , 12 , 1503 – 1506 ( 1991. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. ) Esumi , H. , Ohgaki , H. , Kohzen , E. , Takayama , S. and Sugimura , T.Induction of lymphoma in CDF1 mice by the food mutagen, 2‐amino‐ l‐methyl‐6‐phenylimidazo[4,5‐b]‐pyridine . Jpn. J. Cancer Res. , 80 , 1176 – 1178 ( 1989. ). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. ) Ito , N. , Hasegawa , R. , Shirai , T. , Fukushima , S. , Hakoi , K. , Takaba , K. , Iwasaki , S. , Wakabayashi , K. , Nagao , M. and Sugimura , T.Enhancement of GST‐P positive liver cell foci development by combined treatment of rats with five heterocyclic amines at low doses . Carcinogenesis , 12 , 767 – 772 ( 1991. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. ) Hasegawa , R. , Shirai , T. , Hakoi , K. , Takaba , K. , Iwasaki , S. , Hoshiya , T. , Ito , N. , Nagao , M. and Sugimura , T.Synergistic enhancement of glutathione S‐transferase placental form‐positive hepatic foci development in diethyl‐nitrosamine‐treated rats by combined administration of five heterocyclic amines at low doses . Jpn. J. Cancer Res. , 82 , 1378 – 1384 ( 1991. ). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. ) Hasegawa , R. , Miyata , E. , Futakuchi , M. , Hagiwara , A. , Nagao , M. , Sugimura , T. and Ito , N.Synergistic enhancement of hepatic foci development by combined treatment of rats with 10 heterocyclic amines at low doses . Carcinogenesis , 15 , 1037 – 1041 ( 1994. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. ) Ito , N. , Tsuda , H. , Tatematsu , M. , Inoue , T. , Tagawa , Y. , Aoki , T. , Uwagawa , S. , Kagawa , M. , Ogiso , T. , Masui , T. , Imaida , K. , Fukushima , S. and Asamoto , M.Enhancing effect of various hepatocarcinogens on induction of preneoplastic glutathione S‐transferase placental form positive foci in rats ‐ an approach for a new medium‐term bioassay system . Carcinogenesis , 9 , 387 – 394 ( 1988. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. ) Hasegawa , R. and Ito , N.Liver medium‐term bioassay in rats for screening of carcinogens and modifying factors in hepatocarcinogenesis . Food Chem. Toxicol , 11 , 979 – 992 ( 1992. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. ) Hasegawa , R. , Takayama , S. and Ito , N.Effects of low level exposure to multiple carcinogens in combination . In“Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures,” ed. Yang R. S. H. , pp. 361 – 382 ( 1994. ). Academic Press; , San Diego , CA . [Google Scholar]
  • 17. ) Hasegawa , R. , Shirai , T. and Ito , N.Enhancement of liver carcinogenesis by combined treatment of rats with heterocyclic amines . Environ. Mutat. Res. Commun. , 17 , 83 – 91 ( 1995. ). [Google Scholar]
  • 18. ) Reif, A. E. Synergism in carcinogenesis . J. Natl. Cancer Inst. , 73 , 25 – 39 ( 1984. ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. ) Loewe , S.The problem of synergism and antagonism of combined drugs . Arzneim. Forsch , 3 , 285 – 290 ( 1953. ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. ) Berenbaum , M. C.Criteria for analyzing interaction between biologically active agents . Adv. Cancer Res. , 35 , 269 – 333 ( 1981. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. ) Kato , R.Metabolic activation of mutagenic heterocyclic aromatic amines from protein pyrolysates . CRC Crit. Rev. Toxicol , 16 , 307 – 348 ( 1986. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. ) Alexander , J. and Wallin , H.Metabolic fate of heterocyclic amines from cooked food . CRC Crit. Rev. Toxicol , 20 , 143 – 153 ( 1990. ). [Google Scholar]
  • 23. ) Degawa , M. , Yamazoe , Y. , Hasegawa , R. and Shirai , T.Induction of CYP1A2 enzymes by combined administration of five heterocyclic amines at low doses . Proc. Jpn. Cancer Assoc, 54th Annu. Meet. , 74 ( 1995. ). [Google Scholar]
  • 24. ) Takahashi , S. , Hasegawa , R. , Mutai , M. , Ito , N. , Ochiai , M. , Nagao , M. and Sugimura , T.Additive action of five heterocyclic amines in terms of induction of GST‐P positive single cells and foci in rat liver and DNA adduct formation . J. Toxicol. Pathol , 7 , 423 – 428 ( 1994. ). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Japanese Journal of Cancer Research : Gann are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES