Abstract
Aims
To identify the association between mental health problems, eating behavior patterns, nutrient intakes and health related quality of life (HRQoL) among Iranian female adolescents.
Materials and methods
The current cross-sectional study conducted among three high-schools randomly selected from 10-day-public high schools in the selected sub-county from Tabriz city-Iran between December 2015 through March 2016. Participants were a sample of 107 adolescent girls aged 15–17 years old. Anthropometric parameters were measured and assessments of HRQoL, mental health problems and eating behavioral patterns were performed by Short Form 36 (SF-36), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ) and Eating Behavioral Pattern Questionnaire (EBPQ) respectively. Dietary intake was assessed using a semi-quantitative Food-Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) adapted for the Iranian society. Quality of life was measured with HRQoL questionnaire. Quantitative analysis using independent sample t test was performed for comparison of continuous variables between two subgroups (unlikely, possible/probable) of each category of mental health problem. Multiple logistic regression was used to measure the potential predictors (e.g. eating patterns and HRQoL) of mental health problems in two models of crude and adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI). P values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Results
Indicators of conduct problems and hyperactivity disorders were the most prevalent mental health problems among female adolescents (25.2% and 18.6% respectively). The prevalence of hyperactivity disorders among female adolescents was 35.5%. Female adolescents in high scores of ‘snacking and convenience’, ‘planning ahead’ and ‘meal skipping’ eating patterns were more likely to have indicators of emotional disorders (P < 0.05). Also, being in the high tertile of ‘low fat eating’ pattern made adolescents less likely to have hyperactivity disorders (P < 0.05). Moreover, according to our finding, high scores of vitality and mental health components of HRQoL were associated with reduced likelihood of emotional disorders, conduct disorders and hyperactivity disorders. No significant difference in terms of BMI and nutrient intakes in different categories of mental health problems according to SDQ scoring was identified.
Conclusions
In the current study unhealthy eating patterns including ‘snacking and convenience’, ‘planning ahead’ and ‘meal skipping’ eating patterns were positive predictors of “emotional disorders” while “low fat” eating pattern was negative predictor of hyperactivity disorders.
Introduction
Mental health problems comprise of a broad range of mental disorders including anxiety disorders, bipolar disorders, depression and eating disorders are generally characterized by some combination of abnormal thoughts, emotions, behavior and relationships with others [1]. Mental health problems, as common public health issues among adolescents, have a significant adverse impact not only on adolescents but also on their parents and families particularly in relation to health related quality of life (HRQoL) [2, 3]. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a multi-dimensional concept that includes domains related to physical, mental, emotional, and social functioning. It goes beyond direct measures of population health, life expectancy, and causes of death, and focuses on the impact of the health status on health related quality of life [4, 5]. Adolescence, as a transitional period between childhood and adulthood, is associated with dramatic change and development of the physical, emotional and cognitive function [6]. Unhealthy eating patterns including meal skipping, snacking sugar containing drinks and sweets, eating away from home, fast food consumption and high intakes of simple sugars and saturated fats are common among adolescents [2, 6]. Adequate nutrition and healthy food choices are known to be an important factor in the development of brain and prevention of cognitive disorders; unhealthy eating behaviors are important determinants of mental health problems including hyperactivity disorder, depression and conductive problems in adolescents [7, 8].
Numerous studies have suggested an association between unhealthy eating habits and mental health problems in adolescents. In the study by Oellingrath et al [2] significant associations between unhealthy eating patterns including “junk/ convenient” and “snacking” eating patterns with hyperactivity/ convenient disorder and conduct/ oppositional disorders among Norwegian adolescents were identified. In a population-based cohort of adolescents by Howard et al [9] high scores of western dietary pattern include high intakes of total and saturated fat, refined grains and sugars, processed meat and sodium, and lower intakes of fruits, vegetables, omega-3 fatty acids and fiber were associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) diagnosis (odds ratio = 2.21).
In several other studies, dietary patterns and poor health behaviors were associated with depressive disorders and anxiety [9, 10]. In the study by Jacka et al [11] improvements in diet quality and healthy diets were associated with improvements in mental health in adolescents. Breakfast skipping and high consumption of sugar-containing soft drinks and sweets were associated with various mental health problems in three studies [8, 12, 13]. These studies further highlight the potential association between unhealthy nutritional habits and mental health problems in adolescents.
There are several potential biologic explanations for the relationship between eating patterns and mental health in adolescents. First of all, the poor dietary quality that leads to lack of nutrient-dense foods could be associated with mental problems; for example a diet low in folate, zinc, magnesium and long chain omega-3 fatty acids is associated with depressive and anxiety disorders [14, 15] Second possible explanation is the direct effect of diet on the pathological pathways and biologic mechanisms of the mental disorders including the direct effect of diet on inflammatory parameters, immune system markers and biomarkers of oxidative stress responsible for mental issues like depression or anxiety. Studies have revealed that poor diet is directly associated with higher inflammation and oxidative stress which finally leads to mental disorders [16, 17]. Moreover, diets high in simple sugars and saturated fats could affect proteins involved in the brain development like brain derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) [18].
Accordingly, several studies have also revealed the association between HRQoL and diet; adherence to healthy diets is associated with significant improvements in general physical and psychological health, longevity and lower levels of obesity [19, 20]. In a population-based study conducted by Plaisted et al adherence to fruits and vegetable diet or combination diet including fruits, vegetables and low fat dairy products for three weeks were associated with improved subscales of HRQoL; these improvements were 5% and 5.9% from baseline for these two diets respectively [21]. Adherence to healthy diets like dietary approach to stop hypertension (DASH) or Mediterranean dietary patterns without feeling of deprivation and hunger could help people to maintain their quality of life [21]. Adolescents with good adherence to the Mediterranean dietary patterns scored significantly higher in total HRQoL and in the physical well-being, psychological well-being, parents and autonomy, and peers and social support [22].
Recently, studies about dietary patterns have attracted potential attention since dietary patterns provide an overview of diet and facilitate exploration of overall diet and diet-disease relationship that are not revealed when single nutrients or food items are studied [23]. In the current study, mental health problems were defined as three aspects of mental issues including conduct/oppositional disorders, hyperactivity/ inattention disorders and anxiety/ depressive disorders measured by a self-completed strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) [24].
Female adolescents are more prone to develop internalizing mental health problems including emotional problems, depression and anxiety [25]. This is because female adolescents use more internalizing mechanisms to face problems [26]. Child and adolescent’s mental health problems are classified as internalizing and externalizing emotional and behavioral problems. Externalizing problems are consisted of abnormal mental behaviors including problems with controlling unwanted behavior, attention and cognitive processing and include conduct disorder (CD), ADHD, and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). On the other hand, internalizing problems are characterized by an inability to control negative emotions, such as depression, rumination, loneliness, anxiety and sadness [27]. Externalizing problems are more common in boys, while internalizing problems are more prevalent in girls [26]. Unhealthy eating patterns are most likely to develop internalizing rather than externalizing problems and are more common among girls [28]. Teenage girls eat less healthy foods than other population groups; lower self-esteem, more body image dissatisfaction and distortion and thin ideals in the modern society also trigger the unhealthy eating patterns and related mental issues in females [26, 29].
Mental health problems refer to a wide range of disorders including anxiety disorders, bipolar disorders, depression and eating disorders [30]. These mental health problems are more common in women than in men and gender bias in the prevalence of mental disorders particularly occur in the cases of common mental disorders like depression, anxiety and somatic complaints [30]. Females face different roles in society that render them at greater risk of experiencing mental disorders than others in the community. Studies showed that the prevalence of some mental disorders, like depression and anxieties and psychological distress are higher among women compared with men [31, 32].
The prevalence of mental health issues in Iran also is in accordance with corresponding values in other societies; in 2004, according to the study by Noorbala et al, 21% of the total population including 25.9% of women and 14.6% of men suffered from mental disorders [33]. In 2008, these values had been increased to 36% in Tehran with the rate of 2 to 1 in women than men [34].
Moreover students encounter with higher stress than others because of greater material expectations, greater pressure on academic institutions and staff, change in environment, and expansion of student numbers. This stress with serious consequences leads to the development of mental problems [35]. Students’ material expectations include need to supportive educational environment, constructive criticism, organized lectures, supportive materials, clear expectations from different examinations, homework, respect for student beliefs, desire to discuss about student educational concerns, accessible class-related meetings and conferences [36]. Other sources of stress include financial problems, domestic responsibilities, holding a job while in school, and a heavy academic responsibilities as established by Phinney et al [37]. Overall, the students’ stressors could be classified as three classes of relationships, personal factors include change in sleeping habits, new responsibilities, having health problems and poor eating habits and academic stressors include increase class workload, lower grades, many hours of studies, language difficulties and procrastination and also environmental factors include lack of vacation of breaks, bad living conditions, computer problems, divorce between parents, future worries and etc [38, 39]. Therefore it seems necessary to evaluate the relationship between eating patterns and mental health issues among teenage student girls.
In the current study we aimed to: (1) evaluate the mental health problems in the female adolescents using SDQ questionnaire and (2) investigate the association of mental health problems with eating behavior patterns and HRQoL among female adolescents in Tabriz- Iran.
Materials and methods
Subjects
The research protocol of the current study has been approved by the ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. The study was conducted among a sample of one hundred seven female adolescents aged between 15–17 years randomly selected from three high schools of Tabriz in northwest of Iran between December 2015 through March 2016. Three high schools were randomly selected from 10 day-public high schools in the selected sub-county. Proportionate to size sampling was used to sample 107 teenagers. At the school level random sampling was used to select children from each school. Participants were all living in Tabriz city, were from middle-class families and all had Iranian eating habits. Typical Iranian main dishes are combinations of rice with meat, vegetables, and nuts. Fresh green herbs are frequently used, along with fruits such as plums, pomegranate, quince, prunes, apricots, and raisins. Characteristic Iranian flavorings such as saffron, dried lime, cinnamon, and parsley are mixed and used in some special dishes. Moreover, the Iranian eating habits (in terms of meal sizes and timing) would be generally quiet Mediterranean- A standard, simple breakfast, a large lunch and a light dinner- with desserts or fruit before bed [40].
The parents or legal guardians of all participants signed a written informed consent approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. All investigations have been conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. All of the study measurements including anthropometric assessments and questionnaires administrations were performed by research team including two researchers trained about study measurements.
Anthropometric assessments
Weight was measured by calibrated Seca scale (Itin Scale Co., Inc. Germany) with the precision of 0.1 kg and height to the nearest 0.1 cm with a wall scale while subjects wearing light clothes and no shoes. The measurements were performed one time and the students were informed about the results of their anthropometric measurements in written forms. BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m) 2. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 [41].
Measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL)
Health related quality of life was measured using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire first developed by Ware et al [42] designed to provide an instrument for the self-evaluation of health related quality of life. The questionnaire was validated in a large population based study among Iranian population aged over 15 by Montazeri et al [43] for using in Iranian population. The questionnaire includes 36 items measuring eight dimensions of life quality: Physical Functioning (PF); Role Physical (RP), which refers to role limitations due to physical difficulties; Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role Emotional (RE), which refers to role limitations due to emotional difficulties, and Mental Health (MH). The SF-36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0 to 100. Lower scores denote more disability and poor HRQoL while higher scores denote less disability and better HRQoL [43]. The instrument achieved a Cronbach’s α of 0.76 in the current study.
Prediction of mental health problems
Prediction of mental health problems was performed by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ), a brief screening questionnaire for psychological problems of children and adolescents. The questionnaire includes 25 items. Each of the 25 items is scored on a three point Likert type scale ranging from 0 to 2. The items are divided into five subscales with five items each resulting in scores of emotional disorders, conduct problems, hyperactive behavior, peer relationships and pro-social behaviors. The combinations of scores for each sub scales are analyzed using an algorithm defined by Goodman et al [44]. This algorithm make separate predictions for indications of emotional problems, conduct disorders and hyperactivity disorders, peer problems and pro-social behaviors. The algorithm predicts mental health as being “probable” (high risk), “possible” (borderline) or “unlikely” (normal). In the current study, we combined the “possible” and “probable” categories into “possible/probable”, and all comparisons were made between this category and the category “unlikely”. This combination made the groups. The questionnaire may be completed by parents or teachers of children aged 4–10 years or as a self-report questionnaire completed by children of 10–17 year old themselves [45]. In the current study we used a self-completed SDQ completed by students. The questionnaire was validated by Ghanizadeh et al [24] for use in Iranian children and teenagers aged 3 to 18 years old. The questionnaire achieved the Cronbach’s α of 0.71 in the current study.
Measurement of eating behavioral pattern
Eating behavioral patterns were measured by eating behavioral pattern questionnaire (EBPQ). The questionnaire was firstly developed in Vanderbit University to evaluate dietary fat intake among African- American women [46]. The questionnaire includes 51 self-reported items on healthy and unhealthy eating behaviors. Every item was rated in a 5 point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagrees to strongly agree. Six eating behavior patterns were assessed in the EBPQ as follows: low fat eating (questions about the amount of fat in the diet and choosing low fat foods), snacking and convenience (questions about frequent use of cookies, high sugar bars and other sweet snacks), emotional eating (questions about the effect of emotional change on eating patterns), planning ahead (questions about eating out of home and frequent eating of fast foods in restaurants), meal skipping (questions about skipping the main food meals) and cultural/ life style behavior (questions about the role of food in family and community and the role of cultural impositions on food choices). Previous studies in Iran demonstrated the initial validity, reliability and feasibility of the Iranian version of EBPQ for use in young females establishing the Cronbach’s α and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) ranging between 0.55 to 0.78 and 0.67 to 0.89 respectively [47]. However its reliability was assessed again and Cronbach’s α of 0.78 was established in the current study.
Dietary intake
Dietary intake was assessed using a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) of 168 food items adapted to the Iranian society [48]. The FFQ included with specified serving sizes commonly consumed by Iranians. Participants reported their average frequency intake of each food item in terms of the number of specified serving sizes consumed per day/ week/ month/ year, or never. The reported frequency of consumed foods and portion sizes for each food item were converted to a daily intake.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS 18 for windows, SPSS Inc® headquarter, Chicago, USA). Normality of data was analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Chi square and independent sample t test were performed for comparison of discrete and continuous variables between two subgroups (unlikely, possible/probable) of each category of mental health problem respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between mental health problems as dependent variable and eating patterns and health related quality of life as independent variables. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for emotional, conduct, hyperactivity, peer and prosocial problems. The potential confounding variables entered in the multiple logistic regression analysis were age and body mass index. Two models of logistic regression results have been presented. A crude OR and an adjusted OR which is controlled for confounding variables. P values less than 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.
Results
The prevalence of mental health problems according to SDQ scores are presented in Table 1. Indicators of conduct problems, hyperactivity disorders and emotional disorders were the most prevalent mental health problems among female adolescents; while the indicators of prosocial problems and peer problems were reported less frequently. In comparison of BMI and nutrient intakes in different categories of mental health problems according to SDQ scoring, no significant difference was reported (Table 2). Multiple logistic regression analysis evaluating the association between mental health problems and eating patterns (Table 3) showed that female adolescents in high scores of “snacking and convenience”, “planning ahead” and “meal skipping” eating patterns were more likely to have indicators of “emotional disorders” than those in lower scores of these eating patterns even after adjusting for confounding effects of age and BMI. Moreover, adolescents in high scores of “low fat” eating pattern were less likely to have hyperactivity disorders. Adolescents in high scores of “planning ahead” eating pattern were more likely to have increased likelihood of peer problems and pro-social problems. High scores of “meal skipping” eating pattern were associated with increased likelihood of emotional disorders and hyperactivity disorders.
Table 1. The prevalence of mental health problems according to the SDQ symptom scores in female adolescents.
Mental health problems | Category | N | % |
---|---|---|---|
Indicators of emotional disorders | Disorder unlikely | 77 | 70.6 |
Disorder possibly | 15 | 14.0 | |
Disorder probable | 15 | 14.0 | |
Indicators of conduct disorders | Disorder unlikely | 58 | 53.2 |
Disorder possibly | 22 | 20.6 | |
Disorder probable | 27 | 25.2 | |
Indicators of hyperactivity disorders | Disorder unlikely | 69 | 63.3 |
Disorder possibly | 18 | 16.8 | |
Disorder probable | 20 | 18.7 | |
Indicators of peer disorders | Disorder unlikely | 74 | 68.0 |
Disorder possibly | 29 | 27.1 | |
Disorder probable | 4 | 3.7 | |
Indicators of prosocial problems | Disorder unlikely | 91 | 83.5 |
Disorder possibly | 6 | 5.6 | |
Disorder probable | 10 | 9.3 |
Table 2. The comparison of BMI and nutritional intakes in different categorizes of mental health problems according to SDQ scores.
Variable | Indicators of emotional disorders | Indicators of conduct disorders | Indicators of hyperactivity disorders | Indicators of peer problems | Indicators of prosocial problems | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Mean ±SD) | Unlikely | Possible / probable | Unlikely | Possible / probable | Unlikely | Possible / probable | Unlikely | Possible / probable | Unlikely | Possible / probable |
Age (y) | 16.14 ± 0.72 | 17.38 ±0.62 | 16.25 ± 0.71 | 17.14 ±7.72 | 17.01± 6.63 | 16.03± 0.67 | 16.25± 0.72 | 17.14± 7.88 | 16.20 ±0.68 | 19.60 ±14.24 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 20.28 ± 2.70 | 20.16 ±2.77 | 20.35 ±2.88 | 19.92 ±2.56 | 20.13 ± 2.77 | 20.18 ±2.60 | 19.98±2.73 | 20.19 ±2.69 | 20.09± 2.61 | 20.11 ± 3.24 |
Energy (kcal/d) | 1758.37 ± 681.84 | 1900.8± 668.05 | 1777.51± 736.10 | 1784.34± 631.70 | 1775.24± 676.35 | 1845.24 ± 674.19 | 1775.04± 683.30 | 1806.51± 678.90 | 1777.83± 677.95 | 1837.58 ± 679.34 |
Protein (g/d) | 2.21 ± 0.84 | 1.97 ± 0.44 | 64.53 ±31.38 | 64.86 ±26.01 | 65.82± 29.64 | 64.55± 25.97 | 62.95 ± 29.29 | 66.95 ±27.61 | 63.91 ±28.28 | 69.83 ± 28.86 |
CHO (g/d) | 237.21± 96.77 | 267.83 ± 102.82 | 246.84± 102.06 | 244.84 ±101.03 | 240.20± 94.50 | 263.52± 112.11 | 240.25 ± 94.46 | 253.49 ± 107.52 | 244.03± 95.06 | 261.11 ± 129.21 |
Fat (g/d) | 62.40 ±2.12 | 66.62 ± 3.50 | 62.43± 36.35 | 62.57 ±32.73 | 64.05± 35.72 | 62.06 ±30.72 | 65.03 ±37.20 | 61.25 ±31.69 | 63.45 ± 35.99 | 59.98 ± 21.89 |
SFA (g/d) | 19.07 ±9.80 | 23.27 ± 19.03 | 19.53 ±11.17 | 21.48 ±18.10 | 21.74± 17.11 | 18.99± 8.33 | 20.85± 17.88 | 20.35± 10.49 | 21.01 ±15.60 | 18.03 ± 7.61 |
PUFA(g/d) | 13.76 ±10.09 | 12.75 ± 8.46 | 13.25± 10.04 | 12.66 ±8.56 | 13.12 ±9.34 | 12.43 ±8.57 | 14.07 ±10.49 | 11.78 ±7.41 | 13.06 ±9.45 | 11.81 ± 7.23 |
MUFA(g/d) | 22.56 ±16.57 | 26.49 ±23.72 | 21.81 ±15.88 | 25.70 ±22.91 | 23.20 ± 16.23 | 25.60± 26.12 | 24.13± 18.87 | 24.14± 21.19 | 24.31± 21.00 | 20.77 ± 10.62 |
BMI, body mass index; CHO, carbohydrate; SFA, short chain fatty acids; PUFA, poly unsaturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids. Statistics were performed by independent sample t-test and no significant difference was observed.
Table 3. Association between tertiles of eating patterns scores and mental health problems among adolescents.
Eating patterns | N | Indicators of emotional disorders | Indicators of conduct disorders | Indicators of hyperactivity disorders | Indicators of peer problems | Indicators of prosocial problems | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude | Adjusted † | Crude | Adjusted† | Crude | Adjusted † | Crude | Adjusted † | Crude | Adjusted† | ||||||||||||
OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||
Low fat eating pattern | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tertile1 | 31 | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. |
Tertile2 | 32 | 0.82 | 0.19–1.60 | 0.81 | 0.28–2.24 | 0.37 | 0.13–1.05 | 0.39 | 0.14–1.12 | 0.36 | 0.13–1.02 | 0.35 | 0.12–1.01 | 2.96 | 1.10–7.94 | 2.97 | 1.14–8.07 | 0.47 | 0.14–1.62 | 0.47 | 0.13–1.71 |
Tertile3 | 27 | 0.56 | 0.31–2.27 | 0.61 | 0.21–1.80 | 0.16 | 0.05–0.52 | 0.18 | 0.05–0.58 | 0.41 | 0.14–1.24 | 0.37 | 0.12–1.16 | 1.88 | 0.66–5.31 | 1.93 | 0.66–5.64 | 0.11 | 0.01–0.91 | 0.11 | 0.01–0.91 |
Emotional eating pattern | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tertile1 | 32 | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. |
Tertile2 | 33 | 1.21 | 0.86–7.11 | 1.21 | 0.45–3.29 | 1.13 | 0.44–2.94 | 1.11 | 0.42–2.89 | 0.35 | 0.12–1.01 | 0.93 | 0.32–2.72 | 0.85 | 0.33–2.19 | 0.84 | 0.33–2.18 | 2.07 | 0.54–7.85 | 2.12 | 0.55–8.09 |
Tertile3 | 27 | 2.48 | 0.45–3.25 | 2.33 | 0.79–6.83 | 0.87 | 0.32–2.39 | 0.85 | 0.31–2.40 | 0.37 | 0.12–1.16 | 3.15 | 1.06–9.24 | 0.92 | 0.34–2.48 | 0.99 | 0.36–2.73 | 0.92 | 0.18–4.49 | 0.61 | 0.11–3.53 |
Snacking and convenience | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tertile1 | 34 | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. |
Tertile2 | 28 | 1.40 | 0.51–3.86 | 1.47 | 0.52–4.18 | 0.50 | 0.18–1.36 | 0.50 | 0.18–0.36 | 0.72 | 0.24–2.16 | 0.73 | 0.24–2.25 | 0.59 | 0.23–1.57 | 0.63 | 0.24–1.67 | 0.35 | 0.06–1.90 | 0.42 | 0.07–2.37 |
Tertile3 | 32 | 2.69 | 0.99–7.28 | 2.88 | 1.03–8.04 | 1.57 | 0.60–4.13 | 1.57 | 0.59–4.19 | 2.22 | 0.82–6.0 | 2.36 | 0.83–6.42 | 0.88 | 0.34–2.31 | 0.94 | 0.35–2.46 | 1.4 | 0.33–3.98 | 1.37 | 0.37–5.07 |
Planning ahead eating pattern | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tertile1 | 32 | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. |
Tertile2 | 33 | 0.95 | 0.35–2.56 | 0.95 | 0.34–2.65 | 1.77 | 0.67–4.69 | 1.90 | 0.73–4.94 | 1.72 | 0.61–4.81 | 1.72 | 0.61–4.91 | 3.60 | 1.32–9.79 | 3.81 | 1.36–10.6 | 8.25 | 0.95–71.1 | 8.88 | 1.00–78.5 |
Tertile3 | 27 | 4.17 | 1.37–12.7 | 3.90 | 1.25–12.1 | 1.41 | 0.40–3.25 | 1.26 | 0.45–3.52 | 1.79 | 0.62–5.26 | 2.01 | 0.67–6.02 | 3.00 | 1.04–8.64 | 2.90 | 0.99–8.52 | 8.60 | 0.97–76.4 | 7.49 | 0.82–68.8 |
Meal skipping eating pattern | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tertile1 | 33 | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. |
Tertile2 | 37 | 1.89 | 0.72–4.99 | 1.76 | 0.69–4.69 | 1.55 | 0.62–3.89 | 1.47 | 0.58–3.73 | 1.96 | 0.69–5.52 | 2.25 | 0.78–6.52 | 0.95 | 0.38–2.25 | 0.91 | 0.36–2.24 | 1.09 | 0.33–3.62 | 0.94 | 0.27–3.22 |
Tertile3 | 24 | 4.85 | 4.85–15.1 | 4.62 | 1.45–14.6 | 1.45 | 0.51–4.18 | 1.44 | 0.50–4.17 | 3.06 | 0.99–9.41 | 3.87 | 1.18–12.6 | 0.63 | 0.22–1.80 | 0.62 | 0.21–1.76 | 0.47 | 0.08–2.54 | 0.45 | 0.08–2.45 |
Cultural and life style behavior eating pattern | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tertile1 | 35 | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. |
Tertile2 | 32 | 0.92 | 0.35–2.42 | 0.94 | 0.35–2.51 | 0.85 | 0.33–2.19 | 0.92 | 0.35–2.41 | 1.69 | 0.62–4.63 | 1.81 | 0.64–5.08 | 2.45 | 0.92–6.46 | 2.49 | 0.93–6.67 | 1.76 | 0.45–1.90 | 1.81 | 0.45–7.20 |
Tertile3 | 29 | 1.46 | 0.54–3.92 | 1.28 | 0.46–3.51 | 0.56 | 0.21–1.52 | 0.52 | 0.19–1.43 | 1.11 | 0.38–3.24 | 1.26 | 0.42–3.75 | 0.77 | 0.28–2.12 | 0.71 | 0.25–1.92 | 1.22 | 0.28–5.35 | 0.92 | 0.19–4.46 |
Ref, reference; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
*Significant associations are presented in bold fonts (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01).
† Adjusted for background variables including age and body mass index.
Multiple logistic regression also showed that adolescents in high scores of “vitality” subscale of health related quality of life, had reduced likelihood of emotional disorders, conduct disorders and hyperactivity disorders; while adolescents in high scores of “mental health” components had reduced likelihood of emotional disorders and conduct problems (Table 4).
Table 4. Association between tertiles of components of quality of life scores and mental health problems among adolescents.
HRQoL components | Indicators of emotional disorders | Indicators of conduct problems | Indicators of hyperactivity disorders | Indicators of peer problems | Indicators of prosocial problems | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crude | Adjusted† | Crude | Adjusted † | Crude | Adjusted† | Crude | Adjusted† | Crude | Adjusted† | ||||||||||||
N | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
Physical functioning | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tertile1 | 29 | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. |
Tertile2 | 37 | 0.98 | 0.37–2.60 | 0.98 | 0.37–2.60 | 0.95 | 0.36–2.48 | 0.95 | 0.36–2.48 | 0.58 | 0.21–1.67 | 0.58 | 0.20–1.68 | 0.61 | 0.23–1.59 | 0.61 | 0.23–1.58 | 0.34 | 0.08–1.52 | 0.35 | 0.08–1.52 |
Tertile3 | 21 | 0.70 | 0.23–2.17 | 0.64 | 0.21–2.21 | 1.75 | 0.56–5.40 | 1.67 | 0.54–5.22 | 1.36 | 0.44–4.24 | 1.36 | 0.43–4.39 | 1.12 | 0.37–3.36 | 1.11 | 0.34–3.18 | 0.65 | 0.15–2.97 | 0.47 | 0.08–2.52 |
Role limitations due to physical difficulties | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tertile1 | 36 | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. |
Tertile2 | 28 | 0.35 | 0.13–0.98 | 0.32 | 0.11–0.93 | 0.59 | 0.22–1.59 | 0.54 | 0.19–1.46 | 0.91 | 0.32–2.57 | 0.97 | 0.34–2.78 | 0.99 | 0.37–2.63 | 1.01 | 0.37–2.72 | 0.72 | 0.21–2.47 | 0.61 | 0.16–2.27 |
Tertile3 | 31 | 0.46 | 0.17–1.22 | 0.45 | 0.17–1.22 | 0.95 | 0.36–2.49 | 0.98 | 0.37–2.58 | 0.64 | 0.23–1.82 | 0.61 | 0.21–1.76 | 0.37 | 0.84–0.98 | 0.34 | 0.12–0.93 | 0.12 | 0.01–1.03 | 0.11 | 0.01–0.99 |
Role limitations due to emotional difficulties | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tertile1 | 31 | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. |
Tertile2 | 35 | 0.87 | 0.33–2.29 | 0.85 | 0.32–2.27 | 1.12 | 0.43–2.91 | 1.13 | 0.44–2.94 | 0.88 | 0.33–2.35 | 0.91 | 0.34–2.42 | 1 | 0.39–2.55 | 0.99 | 0.38–2.53 | 1 | 0.29–3.45 | 0.99 | 0.28–3.45 |
Tertile3 | 30 | 0.47 | 0.17–1.33 | 0.42 | 0.15–1.21 | 1.13 | 0.28–2.01 | 0.72 | 0.26–1.98 | 0.54 | 0.18–1.61 | 0.57 | 0.19–1.75 | 0.66 | 0.25–1.79 | 0.61 | 0.22–1.65 | 0.35 | 0.06–1.92 | 0.18 | 0.02–1.53 |
Vitality subscale | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tertile1 | 39 | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. |
Tertile2 | 36 | 1.49 | 0.59–3.74 | 1.41 | 0.55–3.59 | 0.45 | 0.18–1.13 | 0.38 | 0.14–0.99 | 0.30 | 0.11–0.82 | 0.32 | 0.11–0.83 | 1.74 | 0.72–4.25 | 1.75 | 0.71–4.36 | 0.42 | 0.19–1.49 | 0.31 | 0.08–1.27 |
Tertile3 | 22 | 0.27 | 0.08–0.91 | 0.26 | 0.07–0.86 | 0.17 | 0.05–0.55 | 0.15 | 0.04–0.49 | 0.31 | 0.11–0.97 | 0.30 | 0.10–0.98 | 1.08 | 0.38–3.04 | 1.14 | 0.41–3.25 | 0.35 | 0.07–1.77 | 0.34 | 0.06–1.75 |
Mental health | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tertile1 | 30 | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. |
Tertile2 | 53 | 0.18 | 0.06–0.51 | 0.17 | 0.06–0.51 | 0.25 | 0.09–0.67 | 0.26 | 0.1–0.69 | 0.46 | 0.18–1.14 | 0.45 | 0.18–1.14 | 0.67 | 0.28–1.59 | 0.68 | 0.28–1.65 | 1.66 | 0.48–5.81 | 2.12 | 0.55–8.26 |
Tertile3 | 13 | 0.13 | 0.03–0.57 | 0.13 | 0.03–0.57 | 0.06 | 0.01–0.33 | 0.06 | 0.01–0.35 | 0.22 | 0.04–1.14 | 0.21 | 0.03–1.10 | 0.52 | 0.14–3.25 | 0.52 | 0.13–1.96 | 0.62 | 0.06–6.81 | 0.79 | 0.07–8.45 |
Social functioning | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tertile1 | 36 | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. |
Tertile2 | 38 | 1.14 | 0.45–2.89 | 0.97 | 0.37–2.56 | 0.95 | 0.38–2.35 | 0.89 | 0.36–2.23 | 0.99 | 0.36–2.69 | 1.20 | 0.43–3.41 | 0.66 | 0.27–1.62 | 0.62 | 0.25–1.54 | 0.75 | 0.23–2.51 | 0.62 | 0.18–2.17 |
Tertile3 | 21 | 5.02 | 1.50–16.8 | 4.91 | 1.45–16.5 | 3.71 | 1.11–12.2 | 3.63 | 1.09–12.5 | 2.70 | 0.89–8.16 | 3.18 | 0.98–9.72 | 0.75 | 0.26–2.15 | 0.76 | 0.26–2.18 | 0.44 | 0.08–2.35 | 0.44 | 0.08–2.34 |
Bodily pain | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tertile1 | 33 | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. |
Tertile2 | 30 | 1.16 | 0.42–3.23 | 1.22 | 0.44–3.44 | 1.76 | 0.65–4.81 | 1.76 | 0.65–4.87 | 2.04 | 0.64–6.51 | 2.15 | 0.65–7.05 | 2.47 | 0.92–6.62 | 2.59 | 0.96–7.02 | 1.97 | 0.43–9.03 | 2.06 | 0.44–9.59 |
Tertile3 | 34 | 3.20 | 1.18–8.71 | 3.35 | 1.18–9.48 | 3.83 | 1.40–10.4 | 3.72 | 1.32–10.4 | 3.60 | 1.19–10.8 | 4.02 | 1.26–12.7 | 1.26 | 0.48–3.31 | 1.30 | 0.48–3.52 | 2.48 | 0.59–10.5 | 2.32 | 0.52–10.4 |
General health | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tertile1 | 40 | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. | 1 | Ref. |
Tertile2 | 31 | 0.94 | 0.38–2.41 | 0.93 | 0.36–2.41 | 0.67 | 0.26–1.74 | 0.68 | 0.26–1.77 | 0.99 | 0.36–2.73 | 1.01 | 0.36–2.83 | 3.11 | 1.18–8.19 | 3.07 | 1.16–8.12 | 2.06 | 0.44–9.59 | 1.18 | 0.26–4.02 |
Tertile3 | 25 | 0.93 | 0.34–2.51 | 0.88 | 0.32–2.46 | 0.89 | 0.34–2.35 | 0.86 | 0.32–2.29 | 1.49 | 0.55–4.05 | 1.44 | 0.52–4.02 | 2.76 | 1.03–7.38 | 2.63 | 0.97–7.10 | 2.32 | 0.52–10.4 | 1.02 | 0.32–4.30 |
Ref, reference; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
*Significant associations are presented in bold fonts (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01).
† Adjusted for background variables including age and body mass index.
Discussion
In the current study a high prevalence of mental health problems in female adolescents was identified. Moreover, we found a significant relationship between behavioral eating patterns and mental health problems in female adolescents independent of age and BMI. Adolescents with higher adherence to “snacking and convenience”, “planning ahead” and “meal skipping” eating patterns were more likely to have indicators of emotional disorders. Additionally, adolescents in high scores of “low fat” eating pattern were less likely to have hyperactivity disorder.
In the current study, the prevalence of abnormal SDQ scores ranged between 3.73 to 25.23% in female adolescents. These percentages were comparable or even slightly higher compared with the previous reports of the prevalence of mental health problems in developing countries. Similar to our findings, in the study by Rabbani et al [49] the total prevalence of mental health problems evaluated by SDQ in female Iranian adolescents was 17.8% and the most prevalent mental health problem domain was conduct disorder (20.5%). In other study by Atilola et al [50] evaluating the prevalence of self-reported mental health problems using SDQ questionnaire among adolescents of five developing countries, 10.5% the prevalence of mental health problems was reported (range from 5.8 to 15%). The corresponding values of the prevalence of mental health problems in developed countries are lower. In the study by Oellingrath et al [2] the prevalence of combined borderline and abnormal SDQ scores among Norwegian adolescents ranged between 2–9%. Therefore residency and area of life are important determinants of mental health problems. In other study by Greally et al [51] the prevalence of abnormal and borderline SDQ scores among Irish adolescents were 8.7 and 15.3% respectively.
The major contributing factors in the higher prevalence of mental disorders in Iranian females are having multiple roles in the home and in the society, the effects of modernization and social media in defining thin ideals and make women with low self-esteem, more body image dissatisfaction and distortion, triggers the unhealthy eating patterns and eventually leads to mental health issues among this population [18, 29–31, 52].
The association between eating patterns and mental health can be explained by the association of eating low nutrient-dense foods with mental problems via the direct effect of diet on inflammatory parameters, immune system markers and biomarkers of oxidative stress responsible for mental issues like depression or anxiety and the effects of unhealthy food items like simple sugars and saturated fats on the proteins involved in the brain development like BDNF [14–18].
Several previous studies assessed the relationship between mental health problems and eating habits in adolescents. These studies mostly reported the association of unhealthy eating patterns with ADHD [9] depressive disorders and anxiety [7, 10]. Moreover, main meal skipping and high consumption of sugar-containing soft drinks have been associated with various mental health problems [8, 12, 13].
Most of the studies in this field have focused on diet or dietary patterns as a whole; while, in the current study we evaluated the association between eating behavioral patterns and mental health problems in female adolescents. In fact, there are different assessments of mental health problems and dietary patterns which make the comparison of results difficult; however several similarities could be addressed here. In the study by Ollingrath [2] adolescents with high scores of “varied Norwegian” eating pattern, defined as “nutrient-dense foods like fruits, vegetables, unrefined grains and fish combined with regular meals”, were less likely to have indicators of any psychiatric disorders. Moreover, similar to our results, high scores of “snacking” eating pattern was associated with higher indicators of mental health problems. “snacking and convenience”, “planning ahead” and “meal skipping” all are unhealthy eating behaviors that may lead to mental health problems; although these relationship might be bidirectional and mental health problems also may promote unhealthy eating patterns. In other word, eating behaviors might affect mental health by reinforcing healthy or unhealthy eating patterns (i.e., healthy eating patterns might makes people feel better psychologically, but it is also possible that unhealthy eating pattern might also make people feel better emotionally) [53].
In our study, eating low fat foods was associated with lower likelihood of hyperactivity disorder. The possible underlying mechanism is altered dopamine metabolism in high fat diet. In the Kaczmarczyk study, a high -fat diet was linked to childhood brain-based abnormalities, such as memory-dependent learning disabilities and ADHD by rapidly affecting dopamine metabolism in the brain, triggering anxious behaviors and learning deficiencies established in a juvenile mice model [54]. In their study high fat diet for one week impaired learning, memory and dopamine metabolism in hippocampus and hypothalamus. Similarly, several previous studies reported that “Western” and “fast food” dietary patterns were associated with hyperactivity disorder; one of the main features of these diets is their high fat content [55]. In other word, unhealthy food habits can trigger hyperactivity disorder as reported previously by Ollingrath [2]. In their study eating junk and convenient foods was associated with hyperactivity disorder. In addition, meal skipping was also positive predictor of hyperactivity disorder in our study. In fact, skipping meals specially breakfast and dinner is one of the main features of hyperactive individuals and disrupted eating behaviors are common among them [56, 57]. Skipping meals specially breakfast can alter mood, lead to mental distress, disrupt cognitive function and reduce academic performance in adolescents [13].
Eating patterns were associated with mental health problems in the current study, however, no significant difference was observed in comparison of BMI and nutrients intakes in different categorizes of mental health problems. This inconsistency might arise from this fact that relying on traditional single-nutrient approach in nutritional researches is misleading because of the complexity of human diets and high biochemical and nutritional interaction between various nutrients. Dietary pattern evaluates the effects of overall diet instead of single nutrients or food ingredients, and therefore, dietary patterns gives an extensive image of food and nutrient consumption and are more predictive of numerous chronic disease risks compared with single food ingredients or nutrients. In fact, the real eating behaviors of population could be achieved by measuring dietary patterns [58, 59].
In our study, high scores of health related quality of life were associated with lower experience of emotional, conduct and hyperactivity disorders in female adolescents. These findings were in consistent with previous studies reporting lower health related quality of life in patients with mental disorders [60–62].
Several limitations of the current study should also be addressed; first of all, the cross-sectional design of the study eliminates the possibility of identifying the causal relationship between adolescent’s eating patterns and mental health. Moreover, we did not assess several demographic factors possibly affect the mental status and eating patterns like the adolescents’ physical activity and socio-economic status of the family. Therefore it was not possible to adjust for the confounding effects of them. Moreover, most of our information obtained as self-reported data that does not take into account issues concerning honesty and accuracy of responses and therefore might be a source of recall bias and social desirability bias.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our study showed a significant association between unhealthy eating patterns including ‘snacking and convenience’, ‘planning ahead’ and ‘meal skipping’ eating patterns with mental health problems. Our findings propose that unhealthy eating patterns are common predictors of mental health problems. The direction of the associations observed in the current study should be further evaluated by longitudinal or follow-up studies regarding the long-term effects of eating patterns on mental health on adolescents. Moreover, regarding the high prevalence of mental disorders among Iranian female adolescents and their relationship with unhealthy eating patterns, it is necessary to provide effective educational strategies to reduce the potential harm effects of unhealthy eating behaviors.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the cooperation of adolescents and their parents and the school staff.
Abbreviations
- BMI
body mass index
- SDQ
strengths and difficulties questionnaires
- EBPQ
eating behavioral pattern questionnaire
- FFQ
food-frequency questionnaire
- HRQoL
health related quality of life
- ADHD
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Data Availability
Study’s minimal data set is included within the Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This research has been supported by a grant from Nutrition Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.
References
- 1.World Health Organization. Mental Health: Mental disorders; 2017. Available at: http://www.who.int/mental_health/management/en/. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Oellingrath IM, Svendsen MV, Hestetun I. Eating patterns and mental health problems in early adolescence–a cross-sectional study of 12–13-year-old Norwegian schoolchildren. Public Health Nutr. 2014; 17(11): 2554–2562. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013002747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xiaoli Y, Chao J, Wen P, Wenming X, Fang L, Ning L, et al. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among children and adolescents in Northeast China. PLoS One. 2014; 14(9): E111223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Foundation Health Measure Report. Healthy People 2020; Health-Related Quality of Life and well-being. Revised November 2010. Available at: https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020.
- 5.Edwards MK, Loprinzi PD. Psycho-Socioeconomic bio-behavioral influences on health-related quality of life. Health Prom Perspect. 2017; 7(3):124–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chin YS, Mohd Nasir MT. Eating behaviors among female adolescents in Kuantan district, Pahang, Malaysia. Pak J Nutr.2009; 8: 425–432. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weng TT, Hao JH, Qian QW, Cao H, Fu JL, Sun Y, et al. Is there any relationship between dietary patterns and depression and anxiety in Chinese adolescents? Public Health Nutr. 2012; 15: 673–682. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011003077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lien L, Lien N, Heyerdahl S. Consumption of soft drinks and hyperactivity, mental distress, and conduct problems among adolescents in Oslo, Norway. Am J Public Health. 2006; 10: 1815–1820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Howard AL, Robinson M, Smith GJ, Ambrosini GL, Piek JP, Oddy WH. ADHD is associated With a “Western” dietary pattern in adolescents. J Atten Disord. 2011; 15(5): 403–411. doi: 10.1177/1087054710365990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jacka FN, Kremer PJ, Leslie ER, Berk M, Patton GC, Toumbourou JW, Williams JW, et al. Associations between diet quality and depressed mood in adolescents: results from the Australian Healthy Neighborhoods Study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry.2010; 44: 435–442. doi: 10.3109/00048670903571598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jacka FN, Kremer PJ, Berk M, Silva-Sanigorski AM, Moodie M, Leslie ER, et al. A prospective study of diet quality and mental health in adolescents. Plos One. 2011; 6: E24805 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Overby N, Hoigaard RNA. Diet and behavioral problems at school in Norwegian adolescents. Food Nutr Res. 2012, 56:17231–17237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liena L. Is breakfast consumption related to mental distress and academic performance in adolescents? Public Health Nutr 2007; 10(4): 422–428. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007258550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jacka FN, Maes M, Pasco JA, Williams LJ, Berk M. Nutrient intakes and the common mental disorders in women. J Affect Disord. 2012;141(1):79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.02.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jacka FN, Pasco JA, Williams LJ, Meyer BJ, Digger R, Berk M. Dietary intake of fish and PUFA, and clinical depressive and anxiety disorders in women. Br J Nutr. 2013;109 (11):2059–2066. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512004102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Irwin MR, Miller AH. Depressive disorders and immunity: 20 years of progress and discovery. Brain Behav Immun. 2007; 21(4):374–383. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Esposito K, Marfella R, Ciotola M, Di Palo C, Giugliano F, Giugliano G, et al. Effect of a Mediterranean-style diet on endothelial dysfunction and markers of vascular inflammation in the metabolic syndrome: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004; 292(12):1440–1446. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.12.1440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Molteni R, Barnard R, Ying Z, Roberts C, Gomez-Pinilla F. A high-fat, refined sugar diet reduces hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor, neuronal plasticity, and learning. Neuroscience. 2002; 112 (4):803–814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kafatos A, Verhagen H, Moschandreas J, Apostolaki I, Van Westerop JJ. Mediterranean diet of Crete: foods and nutrient content. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011; 100 (12): 1487–1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mamplekou E, Bountziouka V, Psaltopoulou T, Zeimbekis A, Tsakoundakis N, Papaerakleous N, et al. Urban environment, physical inactivity and unhealthy dietary habits correlate to depression among elderly living in eastern Mediterranean islands: the MEDIS (MEDiterranean ISlands elderly) study. J Nutr Health Aging 2010; 14 (6): 449–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Plaisted CS, Lin PH, Ard JD, McClure ML, Svetkey LP.The effects of dietary patterns on quality of life: a substudy of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension trial. J Am Diet Assoc. 1999;99 (8 Suppl):S84–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zervaki K, Yiannakouris N, Sdrali D, Costarelli V. Diet quality, disordered eating and health-related quality of life in Greek adolescents. Nutrition Food Sci. 2017; 47 (4):511–521. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jacques PF, Tucker KL. Are dietary patterns useful for understanding the role of diet in chronic disease? Am J Clin Nutr. 2001; 73: 1–2. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/73.1.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ghanizadeh A, Izadpanah A. Scale validation of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Iranian children. Iran J Psychiatry 2007; 2: 65–71. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Leadbeater BJ, Kuperminc GP, Blatt SJ, Hertzog C. A multivariate model of gender differences in adolescents' internalizing and externalizing problems. Dev Psychol 1999; 35: 1268–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schlack R, Petermann F. Prevalence and gender patterns of mental health problems in German youth with experience of violence: the KiGGS study. BMC Public Health. 2013, 13:628–642. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Eisenberg N, Cumberland A, Spinrad TL, Fabes RA, Shepard SA, Reiser M, et al. The relations of regulation and emotionality to children’s externalizing and internalizing problem behavior. Child Dev. 2001, 72:1112–1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Racine S, Root T, Klump K, Bulik C. Environmental and genetic risk factors for eating disorders: a developmental perspective In Eating disorders in children and adolescents: a clinical handbook. Edited by Le Grange D, Lock J. New York: The Guilford Press; 2011:63–89. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Alipour B, Farhangi MA, Dehghan P, Alipour M. Body image perception and its association with body mass index and nutrient intakes among female college students aged 18–35 years from Tabriz, Iran. Eat Weight Disord. 2015; 20(4): 465–471. doi: 10.1007/s40519-015-0184-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.World Health Organization. Women’s mental health an evidence based review Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mokhtari M, Farhang-Dehghan S, Asghari M, Ghasembaklo U, Mohamadyari G, Azadmanesh SA, et al. Epidemiology of mental health problems in female students: A questionnaire survey. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2013. 3: 83–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jegh.2013.02.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kukreti VT, Bisht AT. Stress and Nutritional Status of Individuals in Uttarakhand, Northern India: Differential Effect of Gender. Health Prom Perspect 2013, 3(2), 255–260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Noorbala A, Yazdi SAB, Yasami MT. Mental health survey of the adult population in Iran. Br J Psychiatr 2004184(1): 70–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sarr PT, Kasturiarachchi CJ, Yang H. Investigating the motivating factors behind high delivery rates of the Urban HEART birthing facility in San Martin de Porres, Philippines. JNIPH 2010. 59(1): 64–9. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sherina MS, Rampal L, Kaneson N. Psychological stress among undergraduate medical students. Med J Malaysia 2004; 59 (2):207–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Student expectations and standards. The department of communication studies. Eastern Illinois University. Available at: https://www.eiu.edu/commstudies/pdf/Student%20Expectations%20and%20Standards.pdf
- 37.Phinney JS, Haas K. The process of coping among ethnic minority first generation college freshmen: A narrative approach. J Social Psychol. 2003;143 (6): 707–726. doi: 10.1080/00224540309600426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Essel G, Owusu P. Causes of students’ stress, its effects on their academic success, and stress management by students. Case study at Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences, Finland. Thesis.
- 39.Hezomi H, Nadrian H. What determines psychological well-being among Iranian female adolescents? Perceived stress may overshadow all determinants. Health Prom Perspect 2018; 8(1): 79–87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ghanoonparvar MR. Persian cuisine: Traditional, regional, and modern foods Mazda publishers, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sharifi N, Mahdavi R, Ebrahimi-Mameghani M. Perceived Barriers to Weight loss Programs for Overweight or Obese Women. Health Prom Perspect, 2013; 3(1): 11–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30(6): 473–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B. The short form health survey (SF-36): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res. 2005; 14: 875–882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Goodman R, Renfrew D, Mullick M. Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores in child mental health clinics in London and Dhaka. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000; 9(2): 129–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997; 38(5): 581–586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schlundt DG, Hargreaves MK, Buchowski MS. The eating behavior patterns questionnaire predicts dietary fat intake in African American women. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003; 103(3): 338–45. doi: 10.1053/jada.2003.50049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dehghan P, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Salekzamani S. Validity, reliability and feasibility of the eating behavior pattern questionnaire (EBPQ) among Iranian female students. Health Promot Perspect. 2015; 5(2): 128–37. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2015.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mirmiran P, Hosseini Esfahani F, Mehrabi Y, Hedayati M, Azizi F. Reliability and relative validity of an FFQ for nutrients in the Tehran lipid and glucose study. Public Health Nutr. 2009; 13: 654–62. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009991698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rabbani A, Mahmoudi-Gharaei J, Mohammadi MR, Mohammadi MR, Motlagh ME, Mohammad K, et al. Mental health problems of Iranian female adolescents and its association with pubertal development: A nationwide study. Acta Medica Iranica, 2012; 50(3): 169–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Atilola O, Singh Balhara YP, Stevanovic D, Avicenna M, Kandemir H. Self-reported mental health problems among adolescents in developing countries. JDBP. 34(2):129–137. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31828123a6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Greally P, Kelleher I, Murphy J, Cannon M. Assessment of the mental health of Irish adolescents in the community. RSCI, 2010; 3: 33–35. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chisuwa-Hayami N, Haruki T. Associations of body-related teasing with weight status, body image, and dieting behavior among Japanese adolescents. Health Prom Perspect. 2017; 7(2):80–87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Polivy J, Herman CP. Mental health and eating behaviours. Can J Public Health. 2005; 96(3): S43–S46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kaczmarczyk MMM, Machaj AS, Chiu GS, Lawson MA, Gainey SJ, York JM, et al. Methylphenidate prevents high-fat diet (HFD)-induced learning/memory impairment in juvenile mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013; 38(9): 1553–1564. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.01.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Azadbakht L, Esmaillzadeh A. Dietary patterns and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder among Iranian children. Nutrition. 2012; 28(3): 242–249 doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2011.05.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ptacek R, Kuzelova H, Stefano GB, Raboch J, Sadkova T, Goetz M, et al. Disruptive patterns of eating behaviors and associated lifestyles in males with ADHD. Med Sci Monit. 2014; 14(20): 608–613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Cortese S, Vincenzi B. Obesity and ADHD: Clinical and neurobiological implications. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2012; 9:199–218. doi: 10.1007/7854_2011_154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Fonseca MJ, Gaio R, Lopes C, Santos AC. Association between dietary patterns and metabolic syndrome in a sam-ple of Portuguese adults. Nutr J 2012; 11:64–73. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Farhangi MA, Jahangiry L, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Najafi M. Association between dietary patterns and metabolic syndrome in a sample of Tehranian adults. Obes Res Clin Pract 2016; 10S, S64–S73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Saarni S, Suvisaari J, Sintonen H, Pirkola S, Koskinen S, Aromaa A, et al. Impact of psychiatric disorders on health-related quality of life: general population survey. British J Psychiatry. 2007; 190 (4): 326–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sawyer MG, Whaites L, Rey JM, Hazell PL, Graetz BW, Baghurst P. Health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with mental disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002; 41(5): 530–7. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200205000-00010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Roberts J, Lenton P, Keetharuth AD, Brazier J. Quality of life impact of mental health conditions in England: results from the adult psychiatric morbidity surveys. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014; 12: 6–16. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Study’s minimal data set is included within the Supporting Information files.