Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2018 Apr 25;56(5):e01865-17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01865-17

Validation of the Pockit Dengue Virus Reagent Set for Rapid Detection of Dengue Virus in Human Serum on a Field-Deployable PCR System

Jih-Jin Tsai a,b,c,d,, Li-Teh Liu e, Ping-Chang Lin a,b, Ching-Yi Tsai a,b, Pin-Hsing Chou f, Yun-Long Tsai f, Hsiao-Fen Grace Chang f, Pei-Yu Alison Lee f
Editor: Yi-Wei Tangg
PMCID: PMC5925719  PMID: 29436418

ABSTRACT

Dengue virus (DENV) infection, a mosquito-borne disease, is a major public health problem in tropical countries. Point-of-care DENV detection with good sensitivity and specificity enables timely early diagnosis of DENV infection, facilitating effective disease management and control, particularly in regions of low resources. The Pockit dengue virus reagent set (GeneReach Biotech), a reverse transcription insulated isothermal PCR (RT-iiPCR), is available to detect all four serotypes of DENV on the field-deployable Pockit system, which is ready for on-site applications. In this study, analytical and clinical performances of the assay were evaluated. The index assay did not react with 14 non-DENV human viruses, indicating good specificity. Compared to the U.S. CDC DENV-1–4 real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) assay, testing with serial dilutions of virus-spiked human sera demonstrated that the index assay had detection endpoints that were separately comparable with the 4 serotypes. Excellent reproducibility was observed among repeat tests done by six operators at three sites. In clinical performance, 195 clinical sera collected around Kaohsiung city in 2012 and 21 DENV-4-spiked sera were tested with the RT-iiPCR and qRT-PCR assays in parallel. The 121 (11 DENV-1, 78 DENV-2, 11 DENV-3, and 21 DENV-4) qRT-PCR-positive and 95 qRT-PCR-negative samples were all positive and negative by the RT-iiPCR reagent results, respectively, demonstrating high (100%) interrater agreement (95% confidence interval [CI95%], ∼98.81% to 100%; κ = 1). With analytical and clinical performance equivalent to those of the reference qRT-PCR assay, the index PCR assay on the field-deployable system can serve as a highly sensitive and specific on-site tool for DENV detection.

KEYWORDS: dengue virus, RT-PCR, field-deployable, on-site detection

INTRODUCTION

Dengue virus (DENV) infection causes a wide range of clinical signs in humans, from asymptomatic to acute febrile illness (dengue fever [DF]) or severe hemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndromes (DHF/DSS) (1). It is a major public health problem in developing tropical countries and has being continuously spreading to new geographical areas (25). Transmission of the virus occurs mainly by the mosquito species Aedes aegypti and, less efficiently, by A. albopictus (6). Moreover, frequent international travel to regions of dengue endemicity or epidemicity has contributed to the escalating numbers of imported dengue cases in temperate regions (7, 8). DENV, belonging to the genus Flavivirus in the family Flaviviridae (9), has a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genome (10, 11); DENV is comprised of four distinct serotypes (DENV-1, -2, -3, and -4), with distinct genotypes within each serotype (12, 13). Since the late nineteenth century, Taiwan has had dengue epidemics in its southern region, especially in the city of Kaohsiung (1416). Recently, relatively large outbreaks occurred, in 2014 and 2015, with DENV-1 and -2 being the major serotypes, respectively (17).

Diagnosis of DENV infections is important since serious manifestations such as DF and DHF/DSS may lead to death if not managed properly. However, clinical presentations of acute DENV infection are nonspecific and resemble those of other diseases such as malaria, leptospirosis, typhoid, typhus, chikungunya, and Zika disease, making diagnosis of dengue solely from clinical symptoms a difficult task (18). Early and rapid diagnosis of DENV infection is crucial to prevent fatal cases and serves as an alert to initiate timely community and vector control programs to help mitigate the spread of infection. Current laboratory methods to aid diagnosis of DENV infection include virus isolation and detection of viral nucleic acid (e.g., reverse transcriptase PCR [RT-PCR]), NS1 antigen, or virus-specific antibodies (e.g., neutralization test, IgM capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [MAC-ELISA], and indirect IgG ELISA) (1921). However, those methods require relatively expensive equipment and specialized personnel, limiting their use to only well-equipped laboratories. For remote regions with limited resources, timely on-site confirmation of suspected cases requires simple, rapid, accurate, and affordable diagnostic tools for DENV detection. Fast and easy immunological DENV NS1 and IgM/IgG rapid tests are available for these purposes (2224). However, the specificity and sensitivity of these methods were shown to be lower in general for some sample types and virus serotypes (2529). The Pockit dengue virus reagent set, an RT-PCR method, has potential to meet these needs.

The DENV reagent set works on a portable and compact PCR device, the Pockit nucleic acid analyzer (Pockit; GeneReach Biotech, Taichung, Taiwan), which can generate simple qualitative PCR/RT-PCR results with a single program within 1 h. The sensitivity, specificity, and clinical performance of the Pockit system have been demonstrated to be comparable to those of reference methods (real-time PCR, nested PCR, virus isolation) for various important microbial pathogens of humans, animals, and plants in different clinical sample types (3040). The methodology is fluorescent probe hydrolysis-based insulated isothermal PCR (iiPCR) performed in a capillary tube (R-tube; GeneReach Biotech) heated at the bottom by a single heating source (41, 42). Once Rayleigh-Bénard convection is established, the fluids are cycled naturally through temperature zones to allow the denaturation, annealing, and extension steps to be completed sequentially, eliminating the need for an expensive thermocycler. Signals from the probe are processed and interpreted automatically (41). Moreover, a mobile Pockit PCR laboratory can be easily established with several simple and easy-to-perform field-deployable nucleic acid extraction methods, including an automatic nucleic acid extraction device, i.e., the taco mini automatic nucleic acid extraction system (taco mini; GeneReach Biotech).

The POTKIT dengue virus reagent set, targeting the 3′ untranslated region of the DENV RNA genome, was derived from the pan-DENV RT-iiPCR system reported previously (43). In this study, clinical performance of the assay was assessed with serum samples collected from dengue-suspected patients in Taiwan. Analytical sensitivity and specificity, reproducibility, and interference of the reagent were also evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cells and viruses.

Four DENV isolates, DENV-1 (Hawaii strain; 2.46 × 106 PFU/ml), DENV-2 (New Guinea-C strain; 2.07 × 106 PFU/ml), DENV-3 (DN8700829A strain; 1 × 106 PFU/ml), and DENV-4 (DN9000475A strain; 1.9 × 105 PFU/ml), were propagated in the mosquito C6/36 cell line (A. albopictus). The virus was diluted in RPMI medium (Gibco-Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 1% fetal calf serum (FCS) and was added to the cell at a multiplicity of infection of 0.01. After incubation at 28°C in 5% CO2 for 4 to 7 days (until the cytopathic effect was observed), titers of DENV stocks were determined by plaque assay. Briefly, 10-fold serial dilutions of the DENV stock were made in maintenance medium (minimum essential medium [MEM]; Gibco-Life Technologies) and added to BHK-21 cells in 6-well plates (at about 1 × 106 cells per well). Maintenance medium was used in mock infections. Each dilution was done in duplicate. Adhesion was allowed at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 2 h before addition of 3 ml of overlay medium containing 1.2% methylcellulose. Cells were incubated for a further 5 to 10 days (until plaques became visually apparent by microscopy), fixed, and stained with crystal violet. Plaques were counted manually, and PFU counts per milliliter were determined with the plaque quantification program (44, 45).

Fourteen virus species known to cause febrile illness or skin rash illness were tested for analytical specificity. West Nile virus (WNV; synthetic RNA, VR-3198SD) and Zika virus (MR766; PRVABC59 strain) were from the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA. Chikungunya virus (CK9500004 strain) was from the Taiwan Center of Disease Control, Taipei, Taiwan. The Japanese encephalitis virus, hepatitis C virus, influenza virus A, influenza virus B (Yamagata strain), human coronavirus NL-63, enterovirus 71, coxsackievirus A16, herpes simplex virus 1, herpes simplex virus 2, cytomegalovirus, and hepatitis B virus samples tested were local clinical samples identified and provided by the Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Clinical specimens.

Research protocols involving retrospective clinical specimens were approved by the Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Institutional Review Board (KMUH-DC-101-0301). Waiver of informed consent was obtained. A total of 195 archived serum specimens (100 DENV positive and 95 DENV negative) from clinically suspected dengue patients were collected at the Tropical Medicine Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, in 2012 for routine diagnosis using RT-PCR methods (46). These included 94 male and 101 female subjects. For DENV-4 samples, 21 of the DENV-negative serum samples were spiked with tissue culture fluids of a DENV strain (DN9000475A). In total, 216 samples were tested for comparisons between the Pockit dengue virus reagent set and reference qRT-PCR with respect to performance. In addition, the blood samples used in the analytical sensitivity and reproducibility studies were from another set of donors recruited with informed consent in 2016 to 2017. All serum samples were stored at −20°C until nucleic acid extraction was performed.

Nucleic acid extraction.

For analytical sensitivity analysis, tissue culture fluids containing DENV-1, -2, -3, or -4 were subjected to 10-fold serial dilutions in DENV-negative human sera before nucleic acid extraction was performed. Samples for specificity testing were subjected directly to nucleic acid extraction. The archived human serum samples in the clinical performance study were subjected directly to extraction. Nucleic acid extraction was done on a taco mini system (GeneReach Biotech) using a Taco preloaded DNA/RNA extraction kit (GeneReach Biotech) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 200 μl of the sample was added into the first well of the extraction plate before the automatic extraction steps were performed. All nucleic acids were collected individually and maintained at −80°C until further use.

DENV RT-iiPCR assay.

The Pockit dengue virus reagent set (GeneReach Biotech), which was derived from the previously published pan-DENV RT-iiPCR system (43), was used as described in the user manual. Briefly, R-tubes were labeled with sample identifiers. Lyophilized dengue virus premix was reconstituted in 50 μl of premix buffer, and 5 μl of test nucleic acid extract was added. A 50-μl volume of the premix/sample mixture was transferred into the correspondingly labeled R-tube, which was sealed subsequently with a cap, spun briefly in a microcentrifuge (cubee; GeneReach Biotech), and placed into a Pockit device. The default program, including an RT step at 50°C for 10 min and an iiPCR step at 95°C for about 30 min, was completed in less than 1 h. Signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios, i.e., ratios calculated as levels of light signals collected after iiPCR/levels of fluorescent signals collected before iiPCR (41), were converted automatically to “+,” “−,” or “?” data according to the default S/N thresholds used by the built-in algorithm. The results were shown on the display screen at the end of the program.

CDC DENV-1–4 real-time RT-PCR assay.

The multiplex U.S. CDC DENV-1–4 real-time RT-PCR assay (47) contained 4 sets of oligonucleotide primers and 4 dually labeled 5′ fluorescent TaqMan probes (see Supplementary Table 1 in http://www.cdc.gov/dengue/clinicalLab/realTime.html). The reaction was performed with a SuperScript III Platinum One-Step qRT-PCR kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) without 6-carboxy-X-rhodamine in a model 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Signals were collected using the 6-carboxyfluorescein, hexachlorofluorescein, Texas Red, and Cy5 channels for the detection of fluorescence generated from the DENV-1, -2, -3, and -4 probes, respectively. The thermocycling program was set up as follows: an RT step at 50°C for 30 min, followed by 95°C for 2 min and 45 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s and annealing at 60°C for 1 min. Samples generating a threshold cycle (CT) value of >37 were considered negative. Each run included negative controls spiked with water and positive controls with in vitro transcribed RNA containing the target sequences of known copy numbers.

TABLE 1.

Analytical sensitivity of Pockit dengue virus reagent seta

Strain Titer (PFU ml−1) Detection rate (no. of assays with positive result/total no. of assays)
qRT-PCR RT-iiPCR
DENV-1 102 5/5 5/5
DENV-2 5/5 5/5
DENV-3 5/5 5/5
DENV-4 5/5 5/5
DENV-1 101 5/5 5/5
DENV-2 5/5 5/5
DENV-3 5/5 5/5
DENV-4 5/5 5/5
DENV-1 1 0/5 3/5
DENV-2 5/5 5/5
DENV-3 5/5 5/5
DENV-4 5/5 4/5
DENV-1 10−1 0/5 0/5
DENV-2 0/5 2/5
DENV-3 1/5 1/5
DENV-4 3/5 1/5
DENV-1 10−2 0/5 0/5
DENV-2 0/5 0/5
DENV-3 0/5 0/5
DENV-4 0/5 0/5
a

DENV, dengue virus; qRT-PCR, real-time reverse transcription-quantitative PCR; RT-iiPCR, reverse transcription insulated isothermal PCR. Boldface data indicate a 100% detection endpoint.

Interference test.

The target sequences of the Pockit dengue virus reagent set in the 3′ untranslated region were highly conserved among the available sequences of DENV-1, -2, and -3. Therefore, the interference and reproducibility analysis tests were done with DENV-2 (representing DENV-1, -2, and -3) and DENV-4. For interference testing, laboratory-grade human endogenous interference biomolecules were diluted in DENV-negative human serum to the physiologically relevant pathological concentrations (hemoglobin [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA], 2 g/liter; cholesterol [Sigma-Aldrich], 13 mmol/liter; EDTA [Sigma-Aldrich], 292 μmol/liter; heparin [Sigma-Aldrich], 3,000 U/liter; bilirubin [Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA] and human genomic DNA, 4 mg/ml) suggested by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), EP7-A2 (2005). Virus stocks were diluted in these samples to moderately positive, low positive, and high negative concentrations; each sample was subjected to nucleic acid extraction in triplicate by the taco mini method. Nucleic acids were tested with the Pockit dengue virus reagent set.

Statistical analysis.

The degree of agreement between two assays was assessed by calculating Cohen's kappa values. Sensitivity was calculated as follows: number of true positives/(number of true positives + number of false negatives). Specificity was calculated as follows: number of true negatives/(number of true negatives + number of false positives).

RESULTS

Analytical sensitivity.

To test analytical sensitivity, 10-fold serial dilutions (100, 10, 1, 0.1, and 0.01 PFU/ml) of DENV-1, -2, -3, and -4 isolates were made in DENV-negative human serum samples and each was subjected to nucleic acid extraction in 5 replicates, followed by DENV viral detection with the Pockit DENV assay and real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR). The 100% detection endpoints were 10 PFU/ml for DENV-1 and 1 PFU/ml for DENV-2 and -3 with both PCR assays (Table 1). For DENV-4, the 100% detection endpoints were 10 and 1 PFU/ml with the Pockit and qRT-PCR assays, respectively (Table 1). The Pockit assay had detection endpoints with the four serotypes comparable to those seen with the U.S. CDC DENV-1–4 real-time RT-PCR assay (47).

Analytical specificity.

The Pockit dengue virus reagent set detected the four DENV serotypes (DENV-1, -2, -3, and -4) and did not react with the 14 viruses in the exclusivity test panel, indicating that the assay had excellent specificity for DENV (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Specificity of Pockit dengue virus reagent set

Pathogen Detection rate (no. of assays with positive result/total no. of assays)
Dengue virus-1 3/3
Dengue virus-2 3/3
Dengue virus-3 3/3
Dengue virus-4 3/3
West Nile virus 0/3
Chikungunya virus 0/3
Zika virus 0/3
Japanese encephalitis virus 0/3
Hepatitis C virus 0/3
Influenza virus A 0/3
Influenza virus B 0/3
Coronavirus 0/3
Enterovirus 71 0/3
Coxsackievirus A16 0/3
Herpes simplex virus 1 0/3
Herpes simplex virus 2 0/3
Cytomegalovirus 0/3
Hepatitis B virus 0/3

Interference.

Significant levels of residual biological components derived from sample collection tools and sample matrix and, when present, nucleic acid extracts can result in inhibition of RT-PCR. In order to ensure that the endogenous biological chemicals in human serum did not interfere with the performance of the Pockit dengue virus reagent set, DENV-negative human serum samples spiked with biological concentrations of EDTA, hemoglobin, cholesterol, heparin, bilirubin, or human genomic DNA were tested. Aliquots of each preparation was spiked with four different titers, i.e., moderately positive (10× the limit of detection [LoD] [100% LoD]), low positive (1× LoD), high negative (0.1× LoD), and mock (negative), of different DENV serotypes in triplicate and subjected to nucleic acid extraction; the nucleic acid extracts were tested by the DENV Pockit assay. DENV-2 and -4 were tested, as the PCR target regions were highly conserved among DENV-1, -2, and -3. The detection rates were all 3/3 for the moderately and low-positive samples, and some were 2/3 for the high-negative samples, as expected (Table 3), indicating that the tested materials did not interfere with the DENV detection system comprising the taco mini nucleic acid extraction test and Pockit PCR test.

TABLE 3.

DENV detection by Pockit dengue virus reagent set in the presence of potentially interfering substancesa

Virus Detection rate (no. of assays with indicated result/total no. of assays)
DENV-2
DENV-4
Moderately positive titer Low positive titer High negative titer Moderately positive titer Low positive titer High negative titer
Hemoglobin 3/3 3/3 2/3 3/3 3/3 2/3
Cholesterol 3/3 3/3 2/3 3/3 3/3 2/3
EDTA 3/3 3/3 1/3 3/3 3/3 2/3
Heparin 3/3 3/3 1/3 3/3 3/3 3/3
Bilirubin 3/3 3/3 2/3 3/3 3/3 3/3
Human genomic DNA 3/3 3/3 2/3 3/3 3/3 3/3
a

The concentrations used were as follows: for hemoglobin, 2 g/liter; for cholesterol, 13 mmol/liter; for EDTA, 292 μmol/liter; for heparin, 3,000 U/liter; for bilirubin, 342 μmol/liter; for 7.6 human genomic DNA, 4 mg/ml. DENV, dengue virus.

Reproducibility.

Reproducibility tests were also done with DENV-2 (representing DENV-1, -2, and -3) and DENV-4. Operator-to-operator, run-to-run, and site-to-site reproducibility was evaluated using a panel of serum samples spiked with DENV to four titers, i.e., negative, high negative, low positive, and moderately positive. The tests were done at three laboratories in Taiwan (Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung; Tropical Medicine Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung; and GeneReach Biotechnology, Taichung). All samples were processed in a blind manner during the tests. Two operators tested all samples in triplicate once a day for 5 days at each site. A total of 720 tests were performed, and detection rates were as expected, at a 100% detection rate with the moderately positive samples; >96.7% (87/90 samples) and >34.4% (31/90) with the low-positive and high-negative samples, respectively; and 0% with the negative samples (Table 4), indicating that this DENV detection system has excellent reproducibility among operators, test runs, and test sites.

TABLE 4.

Summary of reproducibility test results for Pockit dengue virus reagent seta

Virus Titer Detection rate (no. of samples with indicated result/total no. of samples) (%)
DENV-2 Moderately positive 90/90 (100)
Low Positive 87/90 (96.7)
High negative 31/90 (34.4)
Negative 0/90 (0)
DENV-4 Moderately positive 90/90 (100)
Low Positive 90/90 (100)
High negative 68/90 (75.6)
Negative 0/90 (0)
a

DENV, dengue virus.

Clinical performance.

To evaluate the clinical performance of the Pockit dengue virus reagent set, 195 serum samples collected from dengue-suspected patients in Taiwan in 2012 and 21 DENV-negative human serum samples spiked with different concentrations of a DENV-4 isolate (6 replicates at 1.9 × 104 PFU/ml, 8 at 1.9 × 102 PFU/ml, 4 at 1.9 PFU/ml, and 3 at 0.19 PFU/ml) were tested. Nucleic acids extracts were tested by the Pockit assay and the U.S. CDC DENV-1–4 real-time RT-PCR assay in parallel. Among the samples, 121 were positive and 95 were negative by both PCR assays (Table 5). Compared to the reference qRT-PCR assay, the Pockit assay had 100% positive agreement (95% confidence interval [CI95%], 97.81% to 100%) and 100% negative agreement (CI95%, 97.22% to 100%). The overall agreement between the two assays was 100% (CI95%, 98.76% to 100%; κ = 1.0).

TABLE 5.

Agreement between Pockit dengue virus reagent set and reference DENV-1–4 real-time RT-PCR for DENV detection in serum from dengue-suspected patients

Pockit dengue virus reagent set result No. of samples with indicated U.S. CDC DENV-1–4 real-time RT-PCR assay resulta
Positive Negative Total
Positive 121 0 121
Negative 0 95 95
Total 121 95 216
a

DENV-1–4 real-time RT-PCR data are from reference 47. Agreement, 100% (95% confidence interval [CI95%] = 98.7% to 100%).

DISCUSSION

Good clinical diagnosis and management can improve the recognition of severe dengue warning signs, such as impending intravascular leakages (48). Point-of-care DENV detection could help bring health services to local levels, reducing costs and turnaround time while achieving early disease diagnosis to facilitate disease management, surveillance, and control. The use of NS1 antigen ELISA in the diagnostic laboratory has been recommended for diagnosis of dengue in the acute phase of illness. Similarly, the rapid NS1 antigen test allows early DENV detection at points of care. However, the sensitivity of the rapid NS1 antigen detection test was relatively low on days 1 and 2 and after day 5 postsymptomatic onset compared to that seen with the RT-PCR methods (2527). In addition, rapid NS1 antigen detection had lower sensitivity in secondary infections, probably due to the interference presented by anti-NS1 antibodies in the patient (49, 50); the rapid NS1 antigen detection methods also appeared to have lower sensitivity for certain serotypes, e.g., DENV-2 and -4 (28, 29). DENV RNA can be reliably detected during viremia (5 days after the onset of illness) (51) and up to 10 days after the onset of clinical symptoms in some clinical cases by qRT-PCR (48). To aid laboratory confirmation of DENV infection during the first 5 to 6 days after symptomatic onset, detection methods for DENV RNA have been recommended by WHO (16).

Currently, nucleic acid-based methods for DENV detection are more widely available in referral hospitals than in clinics or local hospitals, leaving the majority of the patients without access to early diagnosis in resource-limited regions (51). For these regions, highly sensitive and specific detection tools that are rapid and affordable for the detection of DENV RNA are needed in primary care facilities. A variety of isothermal amplification methods, such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and recombinase polymerase amplification, have also been developed for these purposes (1, 14, 25, 31, 32, 40, 42, 47, 52, 53). However, since LAMP methodology relies on the use of generic fluorescent dyes or turbidity, its limitations included the propensity to result in false-positive reactions and variations in visual interpretations of LAMP signals among different observers (54). The results seen in this study demonstrated that the Pockit dengue virus detection set in the portable and compact Pockit device had excellent analytical sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility; it also showed high agreement with the qRT-PCR to detect DENV RNA in serum samples from dengue-suspected patients (100%; CI95%, ∼98.81% to 100%; κ = 1; n = 216). Hence, the index assay can serve as a relatively inexpensive, rapid, and simple point-of-need (PON) tool for early detection of viremic dengue patients in routine dengue diagnosis, improving clinical management in underserved communities. The pan-DENV RT-iiPCR described previously also had excellent analytical sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility (43). Overall, similar results in clinical performance were observed in these two studies. The clinical samples tested for the previous report were plasma samples collected in Sri Lanka and included mainly DENV-1 (n = 145) and a few with DENV-4 (n = 5) but no DENV-2 or -3. In this study, the clinical samples were collected in Taiwan and included 11, 87, and 11 DENV-1, -2, and -3, respectively.

A nucleic acid extraction step to remove PCR inhibitors in the sample matrix is critical to ensure the proper working of the enzymatic reaction (55). Accordingly, nucleic acid extraction is key for the performance of RT-iiPCR. Automatic extraction methods, such as the taco mini method, can greatly reduce hands-on time and minimize inconsistencies in extraction efficiency due to human errors. In addition, health hazards to the personnel were minimized in the protocols of taco mini by adding clinical samples directly to the lysis buffer in the first step, which can inactivate all pathogens immediately.

For PON applications, the combination of the field-deployable taco mini system (30 by 26.5 by 26 cm [width by depth by height {W by D by H}]; 5 kg) and the PCR device (Pockit; 31 by 26 by 15 cm [W by D by H]; 2.1 kg) is available in a durable suitcase (Pockit combo; GeneReach Biotech). All of the instruments can be operated using a car battery or a rechargeable battery. Only a few simple steps from sample to results are needed with this mobile PCR system. The PCR regent is provided in a ready-to-use lyophilized format for easy shipping at ambient temperatures and storage (tolerating at least 2 years in a refrigerator). Automatic nucleic acid extraction is followed by simple PCR assembly protocols: (i) rehydration of the lyophilized reagents, (ii) addition of sample nucleic acids, and (iii) transfer of reaction mixture into reaction tubes and placing of the tubes on the Pockit device. Interpretation of PCR results automatically generates simple results on the display screen after the 1-h reaction, eliminating data processing and analysis by the user. A hand-held Pockit model, namely, the Pockit Micro Plus (GeneReach Biotech) (throughput, 4 tests; 6.3 by 15.2 by 5.0 cm [W by D by H]; 0.3 kg), is also available. It is a small, lightweight, stand-alone device operated with a rechargeable battery and also can generate and display qualitative results on the monitor in 45 min.

DENV can be transmitted through mosquito bites, particularly during the viremic phase of the disease in which high levels of DENV viremia are present in the bloodstream. For dengue disease control, it is important to extend DENV surveillance in the human and mosquito populations to points of care, generating early alert signals to prevent or control DENV epidemics and reducing the spread of DENV infection. Mosquitoes can be infected by DENV through a blood meal obtained on a viremic individual. The 50% infectious doses of DENV-2 for female A. aegypti mosquitoes were found at >104 PFU/ml blood meal (56). The 100% detection endpoints of the Pockit reagent on the taco mini/Pockit system were about 1 to 10 PFU/ml serum for the four serotypes (Table 1); therefore, the DENV RT-iiPCR test on the taco mini/Pockit system could potentially detect patients whose infection is contagious. Once infected by DENV, the mosquitos could transmit the virus for life after a 4- to 14-day extrinsic incubation period (52, 53). In the absence of a vaccine for DENV infection, surveillance and control of mosquito vectors are important measures for dengue prevention. In the case of WNV, surveillance of the pathogen in the vector populations has been used to follow virus circulation and/or emergence (57, 58), helping in allocating control and prevention efforts to the geographical areas most in need. The DENV Pockit dengue virus reagent set/Pockit system is ready in a mobile and user-friendly format to help implement DENV surveillance in mosquitos in resource-limited regions. Evaluation of the performance of the platform with mosquito samples is currently ongoing.

The Pockit dengue virus reagent set with the field-deployable Pockit combo platform can serve as an easy-to-use tool to aid dengue diagnosis at points of care. It also has the potential to serve as a flexible mobile tool for DENV surveillance in mosquito populations in various settings. Furthermore, as serotyping of DENV currently relies mainly on RT-PCR methods (59), development of RT-iiPCR reagents for DENV serotyping is under way to allow on-site serotype identification.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Chia-Fong Pin and Yu-Lun Liu for technical assistance.

This research was funded in part by National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan (no. NHRI-106A1-MRCO-1017175).

We declare the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: P.-H.C., Y.-L.T., H.-F.G.C., and P.-Y.A.L. are employed by GeneReach Biotechnology, Taichung, Taiwan. The rest of us declare no conflicting interests with respect to our authorship or the publication of this article.

J.-J.T. participated in designing and executing the project and analyzing the results; L.-T.L. in executing the experiment and interpreting the results; P.-C.L. and C.-Y.T. in executing the experiments; P.-H.C. in designing and executing the experiments and analyzing the results; Y.-L.T. in designing the experiments and interpreting the results; H.-F.G.C. in revising and approving the article; and P.-Y.A.L. in interpretation of the results and drafting and revising the article.

Footnotes

For a commentary on this article, see https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00203-18.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kurane I, Takasaki T. 2001. Dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever: challenges of controlling an enemy still at large. Rev Med Virol 11:301–311. doi: 10.1002/rmv.324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gubler DJ, Meltzer M. 1999. Impact of dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever on the developing world. Adv Virus Res 53:35–70. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60342-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gubler DJ. 2002. Epidemic dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever as a public health, social and economic problem in the 21st century. Trends Microbiol 10:100–103. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(01)02288-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Lopez AD. 2007. Measuring the burden of neglected tropical diseases: the global burden of disease framework. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 1:e114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Normile D. 2007. Tropical diseases. Hunt for dengue vaccine heats up as the disease burden grows. Science 317:1494–1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lambrechts L, Scott TW, Gubler DJ. 2010. Consequences of the expanding global distribution of Aedes albopictus for dengue virus transmission. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4:e646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ito M, Yamada K, Takasaki T, Pandey B, Nerome R, Tajima S, Morita K, Kurane I. 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of dengue viruses isolated from imported dengue patients: possible aid for determining the countries where infections occurred. J Travel Med 14:233–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2007.00130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stephenson JR. 2005. The problem with dengue. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 99:643–646. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gubler DJ. 1998. The global pandemic of dengue/dengue haemorrhagic fever: current status and prospects for the future. Ann Acad Med Singapore 27:227–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Simmonds P, Becher P, Collett MS, Gould EA, Heinz FX, Meyers G, Monath T, Pletnev A, Rice CM, Stiasny K, Thiel H-J, Weiner A, Bukh J. 2012. Family Flaviviridae. In King AMQ, Adams MJ, Lefkowitz E, Carstens EB (ed), Virus taxonomy: ninth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Peirson TC, Diamonds MS. 2013. Flaviviruses, p 747–794. In Knipe DM, Howley PM, Cohen JI, Griffin DE, Lamb RA, Martin MA, Racaniello VR, Roizman B (ed), Fields virology, 6th ed Lippincott William & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ali A, Ali I. 2015. The complete genome phylogeny of geographically distinct dengue virus serotype 2 isolates (1944–2013) supports further groupings within the cosmopolitan genotype. PLoS One 10:e0138900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Holmes EC, Twiddy SS. 2003. The origin, emergence and evolutionary genetics of dengue virus. Infect Genet Evol 3:19–28. doi: 10.1016/S1567-1348(03)00004-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chao DY, Lin TH, Hwang KP, Huang JH, Liu CC, King CC. 2004. 1998 dengue hemorrhagic fever epidemic in Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis 10:552–554. doi: 10.3201/eid1003.020518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lin CH, Schioler KL, Jepsen MR, Ho CK, Li SH, Konradsen F. 2012. Dengue outbreaks in high-income area, Kaohsiung city, Taiwan, 2003–2009. Emerg Infect Dis 18:1603–1611. doi: 10.3201/eid1810.111929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hsu JC, Hsieh CL, Lu CY. 2017. Trend and geographic analysis of the prevalence of dengue in Taiwan, 2010–2015. Int J Infect Dis 54:43–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang SF, Chang K, Loh EW, Wang WH, Tseng SP, Lu PL, Chen YH, Chen YA. 2016. Consecutive large dengue outbreaks in Taiwan in 2014–2015. Emerg Microbes Infect 5:e123. doi: 10.1038/emi.2016.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Moulin E, Selby K, Cherpillod P, Kaiser L, Boillat-Blanco N. 2016. Simultaneous outbreaks of dengue, chikungunya and Zika virus infections: diagnosis challenge in a returning traveller with nonspecific febrile illness. New Microbes New Infect 11:6–7. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2016.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Teles FR, Prazeres DM, Lima-Filho JL. 2005. Trends in dengue diagnosis. Rev Med Virol 15:287–302. doi: 10.1002/rmv.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kao CL, King CC, Chao DY, Wu HL, Chang GJ. 2005. Laboratory diagnosis of dengue virus infection: current and future perspectives in clinical diagnosis and public health. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 38:5–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shu PY, Huang JH. 2004. Current advances in dengue diagnosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 11:642–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lima Mda R, Nogueira RM, Schatzmayr HG, dos Santos FB. 2010. Comparison of three commercially available dengue NS1 antigen capture assays for acute diagnosis of dengue in Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4:e738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guzman MG, Halstead SB, Artsob H, Buchy P, Farrar J, Gubler DJ, Hunsperger E, Kroeger A, Margolis HS, Martinez E, Nathan MB, Pelegrino JL, Simmons C, Yoksan S, Peeling RW. 2010. Dengue: a continuing global threat. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:S7–S16. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chaterji S, Allen JC Jr, Chow A, Leo YS, Ooi EE. 2011. Evaluation of the NS1 rapid test and the WHO dengue classification schemes for use as bedside diagnosis of acute dengue fever in adults. Am J Trop Med Hyg 84:224–228. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gaikwad S, Sawant SS, Shastri JS. 2017. Comparison of nonstructural protein-1 antigen detection by rapid and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test and its correlation with polymerase chain reaction for early diagnosis of dengue. J Lab Physicians 9:177–181. doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.208265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ahmed NH, Broor S. 2014. Comparison of NS1 antigen detection ELISA, real time RT-PCR and virus isolation for rapid diagnosis of dengue infection in acute phase. J Vector Borne Dis 51:194–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pal S, Dauner AL, Mitra I, Forshey BM, Garcia P, Morrison AC, Halsey ES, Kochel TJ, Wu SJ. 2014. Evaluation of dengue NS1 antigen rapid tests and ELISA kits using clinical samples. PLoS One 9:e113411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bessoff K, Delorey M, Sun W, Hunsperger E. 2008. Comparison of two commercially available dengue virus (DENV) NS1 capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using a single clinical sample for diagnosis of acute DENV infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol 15:1513–1518. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00140-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ramirez AH, Moros Z, Comach G, Zambrano J, Bravo L, Pinto B, Vielma S, Cardier J, Liprandi F. 2009. Evaluation of dengue NS1 antigen detection tests with acute sera from patients infected with dengue virus in Venezuela. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 65:247–253. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wilkes RP, Anis E, Dunbar D, Lee PA, Tsai YL, Lee FC, Chang HG, Wang HT, Graham EM. 1 June 2017. Rapid and sensitive insulated isothermal PCR for point-of-need feline leukaemia virus detection. J Feline Med Surg 2017:1098612X17712847. doi: 10.1177/1098612X17712847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Go YY, Kim YS, Cheon S, Nam S, Ku KB, Kim M, Cho NH, Park H, Lee PA, Lin YC, Tsai YL, Thomas Wang HT, Balasuriya UBR. 2017. Evaluation and clinical validation of two field-deployable reverse transcription-insulated isothermal PCR assays for the detection of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Mol Diagn 19:817–827. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ambagala A, Pahari S, Fisher M, Lee PA, Pasick J, Ostlund EN, Johnson DJ, Lung O. 2017. A rapid field-deployable reverse transcription-insulated isothermal polymerase chain reaction assay for sensitive and specific detection of bluetongue virus. Transbound Emerg Dis 64:476–486. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang J, Tsai YL, Lee PA, Chen Q, Zhang Y, Chiang CJ, Shen YH, Li FC, Chang HG, Gauger PC, Harmon KM, Wang HT. 2016. Evaluation of two singleplex reverse transcription-insulated isothermal PCR tests and a duplex real-time RT-PCR test for the detection of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and porcine deltacoronavirus. J Virol Methods 234:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Soltan MA, Tsai YL, Lee PA, Tsai CF, Chang HG, Wang HT, Wilkes RP. 2016. Comparison of electron microscopy, ELISA, real time RT-PCR and insulated isothermal RT-PCR for the detection of rotavirus group A (RVA) in feces of different animal species. J Virol Methods 235:99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chua KH, Lee PC, Chai HC. 2016. Development of insulated isothermal PCR for rapid on-site malaria detection. Malar J 15:134. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1183-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wilkes RP, Tsai YL, Lee PY, Lee FC, Chang HF, Wang HT. 2014. Rapid and sensitive detection of canine distemper virus by one-tube reverse transcription-insulated isothermal polymerase chain reaction. BMC Vet Res 10:213. doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0213-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tsai YL, Wang HC, Lo CF, Tang-Nelson K, Lightner D, Ou BR, Hour AL, Tsai CF, Yen CC, Chang HF, Teng PH, Lee PY. 2014. Validation of a commercial insulated isothermal PCR-based POCKIT test for rapid and easy detection of white spot syndrome virus infection in Litopenaeus vannamei. PLoS One 9:e90545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Balasuriya UB, Lee PY, Tiwari A, Skillman A, Nam B, Chambers TM, Tsai YL, Ma LJ, Yang PC, Chang HF, Wang HT. 2014. Rapid detection of equine influenza virus H3N8 subtype by insulated isothermal RT-PCR (iiRT-PCR) assay using the POCKIT nucleic acid analyzer. J Virol Methods 207:66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tsen HY, Shih CM, Teng PH, Chen HY, Lin CW, Chiou CS, Wang HT, Chang HF, Chung TY, Lee PY, Chiang YC. 2013. Detection of Salmonella in chicken meat by insulated isothermal PCR. J Food Prot 76:1322–1329. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Carossino M, Li Y, Lee PA, Tsai CF, Chou PH, Williams D, Skillman A, Frank Cook R, Brown G, Chang HG, Wang HT, Balasuriya UBR. 2017. Evaluation of a field-deployable reverse transcription-insulated isothermal PCR for rapid and sensitive on-site detection of Zika virus. BMC Infect Dis 17:778. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2852-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tsai YL, Wang HT, Chang HF, Tsai CF, Lin CK, Teng PH, Su C, Jeng CC, Lee PY. 2012. Development of TaqMan probe-based insulated isothermal PCR (iiPCR) for sensitive and specific on-site pathogen detection. PLoS One 7:e45278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chang HFG, Tsai YL, Tsai CF, Lin CK, Lee PY, Teng PH, Su C, Jeng CC. 2012. A thermally baffled device for highly stabilized convective PCR. Biotechnol J 7:662–666. doi: 10.1002/biot.201100453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Go YY, Rajapakse RP, Kularatne SA, Lee PA, Ku KB, Nam S, Chou PH, Tsai YL, Liu YL, Chang HG, Wang HT, Balasuriya UB. 2016. A pan-dengue virus reverse transcription-insulated isothermal PCR assay intended for point-of-need diagnosis of dengue virus infection by use of the POCKIT nucleic acid analyzer. J Clin Microbiol 54:1528–1535. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00225-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Boonyasuppayakorn S, Suroengrit A, Srivarangkul P, Yuttithamnon W, Pankaew S, Saelee T, Prompetchara E, Salakij S, Bhattarakosol P. 2016. Simplified dengue virus microwell plaque assay using an automated quantification program. J Virol Methods 237:25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Baer A, Kehn-Hall K. 2014. Viral concentration determination through plaque assays: using traditional and novel overlay systems. J Vis Exp 2014:e52065. doi: 10.3791/52065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Huang JH, Liao TL, Chang SF, Su CL, Chien LJ, Kuo YC, Yang CF, Lin CC, Shu PY. 2007. Laboratory-based dengue surveillance in Taiwan, 2005: a molecular epidemiologic study. Am J Trop Med Hyg 77:903–909. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Santiago GA, Vergne E, Quiles Y, Cosme J, Vazquez J, Medina JF, Medina F, Colon C, Margolis H, Munoz-Jordan JL. 2013. Analytical and clinical performance of the CDC real time RT-PCR assay for detection and typing of dengue virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7:e2311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.De Paula SO, Fonseca BA. 2004. Dengue: a review of the laboratory tests a clinician must know to achieve a correct diagnosis. Braz J Infect Dis 8:390–398. doi: 10.1590/S1413-86702004000600002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hang VT, Nguyet NM, Trung DT, Tricou V, Yoksan S, Dung NM, Van Ngoc T, Hien TT, Farrar J, Wills B, Simmons CP. 2009. Diagnostic accuracy of NS1 ELISA and lateral flow rapid tests for dengue sensitivity, specificity and relationship to viraemia and antibody responses. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3:e360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Osorio L, Ramirez M, Bonelo A, Villar LA, Parra B. 2010. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of commercial NS1-based diagnostic tests for early dengue infection. Virol J 7:361. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-7-361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Peeling RW, Artsob H, Pelegrino JL, Buchy P, Cardosa MJ, Devi S, Enria DA, Farrar J, Gubler DJ, Guzman MG, Halstead SB, Hunsperger E, Kliks S, Margolis HS, Nathanson CM, Nguyen VC, Rizzo N, Vazquez S, Yoksan S. 2010. Evaluation of diagnostic tests: dengue. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:S30–8. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Salazar MI, Richardson JH, Sanchez-Vargas I, Olson KE, Beaty BJ. 2007. Dengue virus type 2: replication and tropisms in orally infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. BMC Microbiol 7:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Richardson J, Molina-Cruz A, Salazar MI, Black WT. 2006. Quantitative analysis of dengue-2 virus RNA during the extrinsic incubation period in individual Aedes aegypti. Am J Trop Med Hyg 74:132–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Goto M, Honda E, Ogura A, Nomoto A, Hanaki K. 2009. Colorimetric detection of loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction by using hydroxy naphthol blue. Biotechniques 46:167–172. doi: 10.2144/000113072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Schrader C, Schielke A, Ellerbroek L, Johne R. 2012. PCR inhibitors - occurrence, properties and removal. J Appl Microbiol 113:1014–1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05384.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Vu TT, Holmes EC, Duong V, Nguyen TQ, Tran TH, Quail M, Churcher C, Parkhill J, Cardosa J, Farrar J, Wills B, Lennon NJ, Birren BW, Buchy P, Henn MR, Simmons CP. 2010. Emergence of the Asian 1 genotype of dengue virus serotype 2 in Viet Nam: in vivo fitness advantage and lineage replacement in South-East Asia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4:e757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Burkhalter KL, Lindsay R, Anderson R, Dibernardo A, Fong W, Nasci RS. 2006. Evaluation of commercial assays for detecting West Nile virus antigen. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 22:64–69. doi: 10.2987/8756-971X(2006)22[64:EOCAFD]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nasci RS, Gottfried KL, Burkhalter KL, Kulasekera VL, Lambert AJ, Lanciotti RS, Hunt AR, Ryan JR. 2002. Comparison of vero cell plaque assay, TaqMan reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction RNA assay, and VecTest antigen assay for detection of West Nile virus in field-collected mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 18:294–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Alm E, Lindegren G, Falk KI, Lagerqvist N. 2015. One-step real-time RT-PCR assays for serotyping dengue virus in clinical samples. BMC Infect Dis 15:493. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1226-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES