Skip to main content
Japanese Journal of Cancer Research : Gann logoLink to Japanese Journal of Cancer Research : Gann
. 1999 Jun;90(6):607–613. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1999.tb00790.x

A Case Control Study on the Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening by Clinical Breast Examination in Japan

Seiki Kanemura 1,2, Ichiro Tsuji 1, Noriaki Ohuchi 2,, Hiroyuki Takei 3, Takao Yokoe 4, Yukio Koibuchi 3, Koji Ohnuki 2, Akira Fukao 5, Susumu Satomi 2, Shigeru Hisamichi 1
PMCID: PMC5926113  PMID: 10429651

Abstract

A case‐control study was conducted in Miyagi and Gunma prefectures, Japan, to evaluate the effectiveness of breast cancer screening by clinical breast examination (CBE) alone in reducing breast cancer mortality. Case subjects, who were female and had died of breast cancer, were collected from residential registry files and medical records. Control subjects matched in sex, age and residence were randomly selected from residential registry files. The screening histories during 5 years prior to the cases having been diagnosed as breast cancer were surveyed using the examinee files of the screening facilities. Finally, the data of 93 cases and 375 controls were analyzed. The odds ratio (OR) of breast cancer death for participating in screening at least once during 5 years was 0.93 (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.48‐1.79). The cases were more symptomatic than the controls when screened. If the participants who had had symptoms in their breasts were classified as not screened, the OR decreased to 0.56 (95%CI 0.27‐1.18). The case control study suggests that the current screening modality (CBE) lacks effectiveness (OR=0.93), although it might be effective for an a symptomatic population (OR=0.56). The number of cases was small, and a larger case‐control study is desirable to define whether CBE is effective or not. However, it is necessary to consider the introduction of mammographic screening to reduce breast cancer mortality in Japan.

Keywords: Breast cancer, Effectiveness, creening, Case control study

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (69.1 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1).Statistics and Information Department , Minister's Secretariat, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan . “ Vital Statistics of Japan 1996 ” vol. 3 , pp . 414 ( 1996. ). Health and Welfare Statistics Association; , Tokyo ( in Japanese ). [Google Scholar]
  • 2).Statistics and Information Department , Minister's Secretariat, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan . “ Report on the Health Services for the Elderly 1996 ” pp . 250 – 259 ( 1996. ). Health and Welfare Statistics Association; , Tokyo ( in Japanese ). [Google Scholar]
  • 3).Shapiro , S. , Coleman , A. , Broeders , M. , Codd , M. , de Konig , H. , Fracheboud , J. , Moss , S. , Paci , E. , Stachenko , S. and Ballard‐Barbash , R.Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: current policies, administration and guidelines . Int. J. Epidemiol. , 27 , 735 – 742 ( 1998. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4).Roberts , M. M. , Alexander , F. E. , Anderson , T. J. , Chetty , U. , Donnan , P. T. , Forrest , P. , Hepburn , W. , Huggins , A. , Kirkpatrick , A. E. , Lamb , J. , Muir , B. B. and Prescott , R. J.Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years . Lancet , 335 , 241 – 246 ( 1990. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5).Tabar , L. , Fagerberg , C. J. G. , Gad , A. , Baldetorp , L. , Holmberg , L. H. , Grontoft , O. , Ljungquist , U. , Lundstrom , B. , Manson , J. C. , Eklund , G. , Day , N. E. and Pettersson , F.Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomized trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare . Lancet , 1 , 829 – 832 ( 1985. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6).Tabar , L. , Fagerberg , G. , Duffy , S. W. and Day , N. E.The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit. J . Epidemiol. Community Health , 43 , 107 – 114 ( 1989. ). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7).Tabar , L. , Fagerberg , G. , Duffy , S. W. , Day , N. E. , Gad , A. and Grontoft , O.Update of the Swedish two‐county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer . Radiol. Clin. North Am. , 30 , 187 – 210 ( 1992. ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8).Shapiro , S.Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial . Cancer , 39 , 2772 – 2782 ( 1977. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9).Shapiro , S. , Venet , W. , Strax , P. , Venet , L. and Roeser , R.Ten‐ to fourteen‐year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality . J. Natl. Cancer Inst. , 69 , 349 – 355 ( 1982. ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10).Frisell , J. , Glas , U. , Hellstrom , L. and Somell , A.Randomized mammographic screening for breast cancer in Stockholm. Design, first round results and comparisons . Breast Cancer Res. Treat. , 8 , 45 – 54 ( 1986. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11).Frisell , J. , Eklund , G. , Hellstrom , L. , Lidbrink , E. , Rutqvist , L. E. and Somell , A.Randomized study of mammography screening‐preliminary report on mortality in the Stockholm trial . Breast Cancer Res. Treat. , 18 , 49 – 56 ( 1991. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12).Collette , H. J. A. , Day , N. E. , Rombach , J. J. and de Waard , F.Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non‐randomized study (the DOM project) by means of a case‐control study . Lancet , 1 , 1224 – 1226 ( 1984. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13).Collette , H. J. A. , de Waard , F. , Rombach , J. J. , Collette , C. and Day , N. E.Further evidence of benefits of a (non‐randomised) breast cancer screening programme: the DOM project . J. Epidemiol. Community Health , 46 , 382 – 386 ( 1992. ). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14).Palli , D. , del Turco , M. R. , Buiatti , E. , Carli , S. , Ciatto , S. , Toscani , L. and Maltoni , G.A case‐control study of the efficacy of a non‐randomized breast cancer screening program in Florence (Italy) . Int. J. Cancer , 38 , 501 – 504 ( 1986. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15).Palli , D. , del Turco , M. R. , Buiatti , E. , Ciatto , S. , Crocetti , E. and Paci , E.Time interval since last test in a breast cancer screening programme: a case‐control study in Italy . J. Epidemiol. Community Health , 43 , 241 – 248 ( 1989. ). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16).Verbeek , A. L. M. , Hendriks , J. H. C. L. , Holland , R. , Mravunac , M. , Sturmans , F. and Day , N. E.Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975–1981 . Lancet , 1 , 1222 – 1224 ( 1984. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17).Verbeek , A. L. M. , Hendriks , J. H. C. L. , Holland , R. , Mravunac , M. and Sturmans , F.Mammographic screening and breast cancer mortality: age‐specific effects in Nijmegen Project, 1975–82 . Lancet , 1 , 865 – 866 ( 1985. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18).Moss , S. M. , Summerley , M. E. , Thomas , B. T. , Ellman , R. and Chamberlain , J. O. P.A case‐control evaluation of the effect of breast cancer screening in the United Kingdom trial of early detection of breast cancer . J. Epidemiol. Community Health , 46 , 362 – 364 ( 1992. ). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19).Fletcher , S. W. , Black , W. , Harris , R. , Rimer , B. K. and Shapiro , S.Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer . J. Natl. Cancer Inst. , 85 , 1644 – 1656 ( 1993. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20).Kerlikowske , K. , Grady , D. , Rubin , S. M. , Sandrock , C. and Ernster , V. L.Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta‐analysis . JAMA , 273 , 149 – 154 ( 1995. ). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21).Ota , J. , Horino , T. , Taguchi , T. , Ishida , T. , Izuo , M. , Ogita , M. , Abe , R. , Watanabe , H. , Morimoto , T. , Itoh , S. , Tashiro , H. , Yoshida , K. , Honda , K. , Sasakawa , M. , Enomoto , K. , Kashiki , Y. , Kido , C. , Kuroishi , T. and Tominaga , S.Mass screening for breast cancer: comparison of the clinical stages and prognosis of breast cancer detected by mass screening and in out‐patient clinics . Jpn. J. Cancer Res. , 80 , 1028 – 1034 ( 1989. ). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22).Breslow , N. E. and Day , N. E.The design and analysis of cohort studies . In “ Statistical Methods in Cancer Research ” vol. II , IARC Scientific Publications No. 82 ( 1987. ). International Agency for Research on Cancer; , Lyon , France . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23).Breslow , N. E. and Day , N. E.The analysis of case‐control studies . In “ Statistical Methods in Cancer Research ” vol. I , IARC Scientific Publications No. 32 ( 1980. ). International Agency for Research on Cancer; , Lyon , France . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24).SAS Institute, Inc. “ SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.11” ( 1996. ). SAS Inst., Inc. , Cary , NC . [Google Scholar]
  • 25).Weiss , N. S.Analysis of case‐control studies of the efficacy of screening for cancer: how should we deal with tests done in persons with symptoms ?. Am. J. Epidemiol. , 147 , 1099 – 1102 ( 1998. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26).Fukao , A. , Tsubono , Y. , Tsuji , I. , Hisamichi , S. , Sugahara , N. and Takano , A.The evaluation of screening for gastric cancer in Miyagi prefecture, Japan: a population‐based case‐control study . Int. J. Cancer , 60 , 45 – 48 ( 1995. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27).Saito , H. , Soma , Y. , Koeda , J. , Wada , T. , Kawaguchi , H. , Sobue , T. , Aisawa , T. and Yoshida , Y.Reduction in risk of mortality from colorectal cancer by fecal occult blood screening with immunochemial hemagglutination test. a case‐control study . Int. J. Cancer , 61 , 465 – 469 ( 1995. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28).Sobue , T. , Suzuki , T. , Naruke , T.and the Japanese Lung‐Cancer‐Screening Research Group. A case‐control study for evaluating lung‐cancer screening in Japan . Int. J. Cancer , 50 , 230 – 237 ( 1992. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29).Morrison , A. S.Assessing the value of early treatment: non experimental studies . In “ Screening in Chronic Disease” ( 1985. ). Oxford Univ. Press; , New York . [Google Scholar]
  • 30).Health Service Bureau of the Ministry of Health and Welfare . “ Report on the 5th National Survey on Malignant Neoplasms” ( 1990. ) ( in Japanese ).
  • 31).Ohuchi , N. , Yoshida , K. , Kimura , M. , Ouchi , A. , Shiiba , K. , Ohnuki , K. , Fukao , A. , Abe , R. , Matsuno , S. and Mori , S.Comparison of false negative rates among breast cancer screening modalities with or without mammography: Miyagi trial . Jpn. J. Cancer Res. , 86 , 501 – 506 ( 1995. ). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32).Ohuchi , N. , Yoshida , K. , Kimura , M. , Ouchi , A. , Kamioki , S. , Shiiba , K. , Matoba , N. , Kojima , S. , Takahashi , K. , Matsuno , S. , Fukao , A. , Abe , R. and Mori , S.Improved detection rate of early breast cancer in mass screening combined with mammography . Jpn. J. Cancer Res. , 84 , 807 – 812 ( 1993. ). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Japanese Journal of Cancer Research : Gann are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES