Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) remains an escalating problem worldwide. The current diagnostic methods do not always guarantee reliable diagnosis. TB treatment is a time-consuming process that requires the use of several chemotherapeutics, to which mycobacteria are becoming increasingly resistant. This article focuses on the potential utility of biomarkers of mycobacterial origin with potential implications for TB diagnosis. Properly standardized indicators could become new diagnostic tools, improving and streamlining the identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and the implementation of appropriate therapy. These markers can also potentially provide a quick confirmation of effectiveness of new anti-mycobacterial drugs and TB vaccines, leading to a possible application in practice.
Keywords: Antigen 85 complex, biomarker, diagnosis, lipoarabinomannan, mycolic acids, transrenal DNA, tuberculosis, volatile metabolites
Introduction
Efforts to control the burden of tuberculosis (TB) throughout the past decade have lowered the incidence of TB worldwide but have not managed to combat the disease. Every year, almost nine million people suffer from TB and about two million die, despite the implementation of obligatory bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG) vaccinations and directly observed treatment, short-course (DOTS) programmes in over 180 countries1. The epidemic of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the emergence of drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis have hindered TB control. Early diagnosis of the disease is essential for the efficient treatment and prevention of the spread of TB bacilli. However, conventional diagnostic assays, such as acid-fast staining and time-consuming culture (6-8 wk) of M. tuberculosis, fail in many patients with active lung and particularly extrapulmonary TB. Polymerase chain reaction-based molecular techniques have a variable specificity. These techniques are suitable for detecting M. tuberculosis in clinical samples in only some well-equipped microbiological laboratories. Chest lesions identified by radiography may be helpful in detecting lung TB, but these cannot identify the causal agent of pathology. In the light of these facts, improved, next-generation diagnostic tests with greater sensitivity and specificity for TB infection would significantly improve the effectiveness of TB control. New diagnostic techniques should be easy, inexpensive and applicable to all TB cases, including patients from whom clinical specimens for culture are not easily obtained, such as those with extrapulmonary TB and children. In addition, these techniques should provide new tools to supervise TB response to therapy as well as potentially decrease the emergence of drug resistance. In recent years there has been an escalation of studies directed to the identification of new biomarkers for TB diagnosis. According to the definition established in 2001, a biomarker is a specific feature that can be objectively assessed and used for the evaluation of physiological and pathological processes or responses to therapeutic interventions2. The M. tuberculosis-host interactions as well as the responses to therapeutic intervention are very complex and dynamic processes, which remain only partially understood. The responses to TB bacilli are complex and multifaceted involving cascade reactions occurring in mycobacteria and in host cells and tissues. Taking into account the vast complexity of mycobacteria-host interactions, biomarkers can serve as surrogates for confirmation of TB infection, correlates of host protection against active TB, predictors of anti-TB treatment success and reactivation risk in healthy controls with latent TB infection. Many large-scale studies have been aimed at discovering mycobacteria and host components that can potentially serve as biomarkers useful in TB diagnosis, prognosis and surveillance. This review discusses the utility of some biomarkers of mycobacterial origin with important implications for improved diagnostics of TB.
Lipoarabinomannan (LAM)
TB diagnosis based on the direct detection of M. tuberculosis cell wall components represents one of the most challenging aspects of TB control. Many of these components are highly immunogenic and are believed to be key entities in the interaction of mycobacteria with the host immune system. The outer layer of the mycobacterial cell contains mainly polysaccharides and proteins with lipid components further inside. One of the major cell wall components - lipoarabinomannan (LAM) - is a 17.3-kDa phosphatidylinositol anchored glycolipid with diverse biological activities. It is a ubiquitous lipid of mycobacteria and is considered as one of the strongest non-protein antigens to modify the host immune response3. The structure of LAM is different in various mycobacterial species and determines the ability to influence the host immunity. Among three possible LAM variants, mannose-capped LAM (ManLAM), phospho-myoinositol-capped LAM and non-capped LAM, ManLAM has been found to be a potent anti-inflammatory antigen and an important virulence factor. After binding to dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule 3 grabbing non-integrin and dectin-2 receptors on dendritic cells and macrophages, ManLAM impairs dendritic cell maturation and phagocytic activity, modulates cytokine release by dendritic cells and macrophages and causes the suppression of adaptive immune responses towards M. tuberculosis4,5,6,7. The immunogenicity and heat stability of LAM support the use of this antigen in TB diagnostics. During TB, LAM is released from both metabolically active and dying bacteria, serving as an immune-modulating virulence factor. Once produced at the inflammatory sites of TB, either pulmonary or extrapulmonary, the antigen circulates in the blood, easily traverses the basement membrane in the kidney glomeruli and can be detected in the urine8,9,10,11,12,13. Urine is an attractive and convenient diagnostic material that can be easily collected from all patients even those from whom obtaining sputum is not possible14. A urinary LAM-based test would be an important diagnostic aid, especially in paediatric TB, which, unlike TB in adults, often occurs with non-specific signs and symptoms15. None of the currently available microbiological, serologic or molecular tests designed for the diagnosis of active TB is good enough for clinical use in children15,16. A gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis aimed at identification of D-arabinose and tuberculostearic acid as surrogates for mycobacterial LAM in the human urine substantiated the antigen as a powerful biomarker for active TB17. However, the concentration of excreted LAM depends on the clinical manifestation of TB and varies between 1 ng/ml and several 100 ng/ml18,19,20. It has been demonstrated that the sensitivity of urinary LAM tests strongly depends on the proper sample processing. Fast freezing of urine in liquid nitrogen immediately after the collection is the most efficient method for preserving the stability of the antigen21. Commercially available urinary LAM assays are characterized by overall good diagnostic specificity (87-99%) but suboptimal sensitivity (13-93%), which limit their use as general screening tests for TB22,23,24,25. In the study registered in Finland and Taiwan, the initial 100-fold concentration of the urine increased the sensitivity of the Clearview® TB ELISA assay from 7 to 57 per cent but decreased specificity from 97 to 89 per cent26.
The LAM immunoassay has been more often positive in smear-positive than smear-negative TB patients, and the level of LAM in urine was found to be strongly correlated with mycobacterial density in sputum samples and other markers of high mycobacterial burden12,27,28. On the other hand, the urinary LAM concentration did not always augment false reactivity26. Unlike conventional diagnostic methods, the tests showed increased sensitivity in HIV-TB co-infected patients, in particular in individuals with low levels of circulating CD4 T-cells and advanced form of HIV-induced immunosuppression, allowing the identification of TB and facilitating early initiation of anti-TB treatment11,20. However, the inability to detect low levels of LAM in HIV-uninfected patients makes these immunoassays unsuitable for use in settings with a low HIV prevalence. The combined rapid detection of active TB using the LAM assay and molecular GeneXpert MTB/RIF test detecting resistance to rifampicin has been proposed by Shah et al29. The sensitivity of urine LAM immunoassay and sputum GeneXpert technique used jointly was 85 per cent, which was superior to any of the tests alone. Further improvements in the sensitivity of urinary LAM assays based on the use of specific immunoassay platforms and high avidity monoclonal antibodies are necessary for extending their applicability to the general population of TB patients.
Mycolic acids
Lipids constitute about 60 per cent of the dry mass of the mycobacterial cell wall. These form a permeability barrier constituting the first line of defence against the host's immune system. Mycolic acids, long-chain fatty acids esterified to the arabinogalactan, are one of the basic lipid components of the mycobacterial cell wall30,31. These contribute to the structural integrity of the cell wall, protect mycobacteria from chemical damage or dehydration and allow them to grow safely inside macrophages. Although the basic structure of mycolic acids is conserved, there are substantial differences in the composition and length of their meromycolic chains. Mycobacterial cell walls contain various mycolic acid types that are used for bacterial taxonomy and identification. The most widely distributed form of mycolic acids in M. tuberculosis is alpha-mycolates, which contain no oxygen substitutions in their chains30. Keto- and methoxy-mycolates, characterized by cis and trans cyclopropane rings in the proximal positions, are significantly less common31. Interestingly, structural alterations and variations in the chemical composition of mycolates have a profound effect on the virulence and physiology of the bacilli. It was found that the deletion of cyclopropane molecule inhibits the growth of mycobacteria32,33. Many studies have confirmed the presence of mycobacterial mycolic acids in both modern and ancient TB, suggesting the use of mycolates as sensitive biomarkers of the disease34,35. Mycolic acids seem to be appropriate diagnostic indicators of mycobacterial infections for many reasons. First, the compounds are present in a high concentration in the bacterial cell wall regardless of growth conditions. Second, these are bacteria-specific and are not produced in the human body. Third, the chemical stability of mycolic acids and their relatively easy extraction allow the use of chemical analysis techniques for their studies. Although it has been demonstrated that mycolic acids are secreted during mycobacterial infection inducing the production of specific antibodies, no standardized immunoassays allowing the detection of such antibodies have been developed36. This is partly due to their hydrophobic properties and heterogeneous chemical structure. A surface plasmon resonance (SPR) inhibition biosensor test abbreviated MARTI (mycolic acid antibody real-time inhibition) has enabled the detection of serum antibodies to mycolic acids; however, the method has not been tested in any clinical trial36,37,38. One of the most recommended methods for the identification of mycobacterial mycolic acids is high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). However, the protocol suggested by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) does not provide complete information about the structure of mycolic acids39,40,41,42. A potentially fast method for the identification of M. tuberculosis lipids is the surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. However, despite its high diagnostic value in the differentiation of tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacteria, it is rarely used as the technique is expensive and sophisticated43. More accurate approaches of mycolic acids analysis involve the use of high-throughput MS techniques. The profiling of mycolates is thought to be a rapid and relatively low-cost method for the identification of mycobacterial species. MS/MS analysis of mycolic acids profiles in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode is a successful method for identification of M. tuberculosis, as described earlier42,44. Our approach involving electrospray ionization tandem MS technique has been based on analysis of 10 most frequent and distinctive MRM pairs allowing the reliable identification of M. tuberculosis and other mycobacterial species. The sensitivity and specificity of the developed method surpassed the parameters of classic diagnostic methods and allowed robust identification of TB-positive patients after two hours of direct sputum analysis42. MS combined with GC provides trustworthy techniques that distinguish M. tuberculosis from non-tuberculous mycobacteria and help in fast implementation of the appropriate treatment45. MS appears to be a sensitive technique for the analysis of M. tuberculosis in paleopathological remains35,46. The use of the LC-MS/MS method allowed the identification of M. tuberculosis infection in the neolithic skeleton with TB-suggestive morphological changes and suggested that MRM-based analysis has a potential to be a promising technique for the studies of ancient mycobacterial strains35.
Antigen 85 complex
The antigen 85 complex (Ag 85) represents a major mycobacterial secreted antigen although it has also been found in the mycobacterial cell wall. The complex comprises three different proteins - A, B and C that are encoded by three separate genes - fbpA, fbpB and fbpC2. The A, B and C proteins are generally expressed by all mycobacteria species regardless of their pathogenicity in a ratio 2:3:1; however, the ratio might depend on the environmental conditions47,48. The Ag 85C is much more biologically active than variant B with the greatest expression level49. The complex possesses a mycolyltransferase activity, catalyzing the synthesis of trehalose dimycolate, the characteristic lipid of the mycobacterial cell wall50. Furthermore, all three Ag 85 proteins have a capacity for binding of human fibronectin, an extracellular matrix glycoprotein that reduces the phagocytosis of M. tuberculosis by macrophages and facilitates the adherence and dissemination of the pathogen in tissues50.
The Ag 85 complex has been detected in various biological samples such as blood, urine, sputum and cerebrospinal fluid derived from M. tuberculosis-infected patients51,52. Although the proteins are expressed by many mycobacterial species, their potential applicability as new TB biomarkers and vaccine candidates requires extensive research53,54. The serum detection of the Ag 85 complex yielded a sensitivity of 96 and 14 per cent among TB and non-TB patients, respectively55. Elevated levels of the Ag 85 were also observed in tuberculous meningitis, suggesting the possibility of using this protein as a biomarker for diagnosis of this TB form51. The monitoring of sputum Ag 85 may represent an important complement to the monitoring of antituberculous therapy as Ag 85 complex has been found in patient's sputum some days after the initiation of the treatment52. However, rapid Ag 85B RNA elimination from sputum in cured TB patients did not allow considering the antigen as a predictor of the relapse56.
Volatile metabolites of mycobacteria
An alternative TB diagnostic strategy might be detection of M. tuberculosis-specific volatile metabolites in the exhaled breath57,58. Breath testing techniques are promising screening tools in populations with high TB exposure as these are non-invasive, rapid and safe. These attractive methods of diagnosis rely on the identification of specific organic compounds such as nicotinic acid, methyl nicotinate methyl phenylacetate or p-methyl anisate57. An increase in the levels of methyl nicotinate and terbium complexes in the presence of nicotinic acid observed in the breath condensates of TB patients confirmed the potential application of these compounds in clinical practice59,60. Scott-Thomas et al61 detected methyl nicotinate, methyl phenylacetate and o-phenylanisole in approximately one per cent of healthy individuals and suggested that these markers were not sufficiently good indicators of M. tuberculosis infection. Analysis of TB patients’ breath samples by Phillips et al58 identified other volatile biomarkers such as cyclohexane, benzene, decane and heptane and their derivatives. These chemicals identified active TB with 84 per cent sensitivity, 64.7 per cent specificity and 85 per cent accuracy. Some non-tuberculous mycobacterial species - M. avium, M. gordonae, M. gastri, M. kansasii or M. szulgai were identified by the patterns of produced volatile metabolites such as long-chain fatty acids (C14-C26) and their derivatives62,63. Mycobacteria-specific volatile compounds can also be detected by tests using non-toxic substrates labelled with isotopes. Jassal et al64 showed that one of the mycobacterial enzymes urease might serve as an attractive marker for diagnosis and therapeutic effects in pulmonary TB. The authors demonstrated the detection of 13CO2 resulting from the conversion of 13C urea in the breath of M. tuberculosis-infected rabbits within 15 min of bronchoscopic administration of the bacilli. The 13CO2/12CO2 ratio was easily assessed by MS and demonstrated a significant 13CO2 increase in the early phase of TB before the treatment with isoniazid. The urea breath test-TB test has been shown to detect volatile organic compounds in TB patients with 71.2 per cent sensitivity and 72 per cent specificity64.
Transrenal DNA (trDNA)
One of the laboratory available diagnostic methods is the detection of M. tuberculosis- specific DNA sequences in biological specimens. Although all commercially available molecular tools for the laboratory TB diagnosis are characterized by high accuracy in the identification of M. tuberculosis, their utility in routine clinical practice depends on their easy application, rapidity of sample preparation and results obtained as well as their expensiveness or infrastructure requirements. The GeneXpert MTB/RIF test is the only nucleic acid-based system endorsed and recommended by the World Health Organization for the identification of M. tuberculosis and its resistance to rifampicin65. The method enables a rapid diagnosis of TB after only two hour of sputum analysis. The sensitivity of the assay reaches 98 per cent in M. tuberculosis smear-positive and 75 per cent in smear-negative patients, but it was lower (50%) in some high HIV prevalence settings65,66,67.
An interesting approach in TB diagnosis is the detection of transrenal DNA (Tr-DNA) sequences, which are released from dying M. tuberculosis cells to the circulation and appear in the urine68,69. The molecular urine-based diagnosis of TB seems to be an attractive and promising method since it allows detecting TB infection in any age group and in any location of TB lesions. Such an approach could improve complicated and unreliable diagnosis of TB in children, who belong to the group of most TB-susceptible individuals with a high likelihood of developing active disease shortly after M. tuberculosis infection70. Urine tests in this group of patients might be particularly useful as the sputum collection from children is extremely difficult. However, the studies assessing the diagnostic usefulness of Tr-DNA showed a great variation in sensitivity (from 7 to 79%) related to the length of the target size, amount of specific DNA sequences, collection and storage of urine specimens and chosen nucleic acid amplification technique71,72,73. Therefore, further studies should be focussed on the optimization of the Tr-DNA detection method that will be the suitable for laboratories in both developed and developing countries.
Concluding remarks
Despite the significant progress of research aimed to explain the pathogenic properties of M. tuberculosis bacteria, some major issues are still elusive. There is a need for cost-efficient but reliable techniques to help us understand the TB disease mechanisms and advance the discoveries of new diagnostic options. A prominent feature of M. tuberculosis infection is the formation of granulomas, driven by both mycobacterial components and host acquired immunity comprising macrophages and T-lymphocytes, in the lungs of infected individuals. The bacteria persist in granulomas, which are separated from the healthy tissues by extracellular matrix and may prevent dissemination of the pathogen. When the defence of the immune cells weakens, the active TB disease may develop. The bacteria begins to multiply; the granuloma structures become disorganized and caseous resulting in tissue damage and spread of TB bacteria in the body and to others74. This causes the current diagnostics of pulmonary TB rely on sputum samples, but the identification of M. tuberculosis in the respiratory secretions is possible only when there is caseous granuloma. This requirement causes a delay in the possible detection of bacteria in sputum of TB patients who suffered from TB disease for some time already. For this reason, there is an urgent need to develop highly sensitive and specific laboratory tests that can be performed on the easily obtainable non-sputum samples such as blood or urine75,76.
It is evident that the detection of mycobacterial LAM, mycolic acids or Tr-DNA in non-sputum samples, can significantly enrich the range of rapid TB diagnostics, yet the methods available still need to be refined. Additional studies are required to improve the sensitivity of the tests which identify these biomarkers by changes in pre-analytical preparation of the samples, concentration and using serum in place of whole blood26,76. The genetic diversity of M. tuberculosis is another factor that must be taken into account; therefore, studies using the strains from different areas are needed when the accuracy of the assays is validated. Recent progress in the area of metabolomics has created the ability to detect hundreds to thousands of small molecules in clinical samples. There is an expectation that metabolic profiling of plasma or urine can make it possible to differentiate patients with active TB from those with latent M. tuberculosis infection as well as to monitor clinical response to TB therapy77,78. New rapid and reliable metabolomic TB assays should be developed for routine laboratories. The high cost of the necessary equipment and materials necessary to perform the tests may limit their application in developing countries with the highest burden of TB.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education grant (N N402 098539, 2016/21/B/NZ7/01771). All authors contributed to the research goal formulation and study conception, preparing the manuscript and scientific discussion.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest: None.
References
- 1.Goletti D, Petruccioli E, Joosten SA, Ottenhoff THM. Tuberculosis biomarkers: From diagnosis to protection. Infect Dis Rep. 2016;8:6568. doi: 10.4081/idr.2016.6568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zumla A, Wallis R, Doherty M, Klein N, Parida S, Olesen O, et al. Report of the Joint TDR/EC Expert Consultation to Evaluate the Potential Roles of Biomarkers in the Management of HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Patients with Tuberculosis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. Joint TDR/EC Expert Consultation on Biomarkers in Tuberculosis. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chávez-Galán L, Ocaña-Guzmán R, Torre-Bouscoulet L, García-de-Alba C, Sada-Ovalle I. Exposure of monocytes to lipoarabinomannan promotes their differentiation into functionally and phenotypically immature macrophages. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:984973. doi: 10.1155/2015/984973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shah M, Hanrahan C, Wang ZY, Dendukuri N, Lawn SD, Denkinger CM, et al. Lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assay for detecting active tuberculosis in HIV-positive adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(5):CD011420. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011420.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dulphy N, Herrmann JL, Nigou J, Réa D, Boissel N, Puzo G, et al. Intermediate maturation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis LAM-activated human dendritic cells. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:1412–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00881.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mazurek J, Ignatowicz L, Kallenius G, Svenson SB, Pawlowski A, Hamasur B, et al. Divergent effects of mycobacterial cell wall glycolipids on maturation and function of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ehlers S. DC-SIGN and mannosylated surface structures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A deceptive liaison. Eur J Cell Biol. 2010;89:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yonekawa A, Saijo S, Hoshino Y, Miyake Y, Ishikawa E, Suzukawa M, et al. Dectin-2 is a direct receptor for mannose-capped lipoarabinomannan of mycobacteria. Immunity. 2014;41:402–13. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Drain PK, Gounder L, Grobler A, Sahid F, Bassett IV, Moosa MYS, et al. Urine lipoarabinomannan to monitor antituberculosis therapy response and predict mortality in an HIV-endemic region: A prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e006833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cox JA, Lukande RL, Kalungi S, Van Marck E, Van de Vijver K, Kambugu A, et al. Is urinary lipoarabinomannan the result of renal tuberculosis? Assessment of the renal histology in an autopsy cohort of Ugandan HIV-infected adults. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0123323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bjerrum S, Kenu E, Lartey M, Newman MJ, Addo KK, Andersen AB, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the rapid urine lipoarabinomannan test for pulmonary tuberculosis among HIV-infected adults in Ghana-findings from the DETECT HIV-TB study. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:407. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1151-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hamasur B, Bruchfeld J, van Helden P, Källenius G, Svenson S. A sensitive urinary lipoarabinomannan test for tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0123457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Patel VB, Singh R, Connolly C, Kasprowicz V, Zumla A, Ndungu T, et al. Comparison of a clinical prediction rule and a LAM antigen-detection assay for the rapid diagnosis of TBM in a high HIV prevalence setting. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sakamuri RM, Price DN, Lee M, Cho SN, Barry CE, 3rd, Via LE, et al. Association of lipoarabinomannan with high density lipoprotein in blood: Implications for diagnostics. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2013;93:301–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2013.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nicol MP, Allen V, Workman L, Isaacs W, Munro J, Pienaar S, et al. Urine lipoarabinomannan testing for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children: A prospective study. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e278–84. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70195-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Blok N, Visser DH, Solomons R, Van Elsland SL, den Hertog AL, van Furth AM, et al. Lipoarabinomannan enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for early diagnosis of childhood tuberculous meningitis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18:205–10. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.De P, Amin AG, Valli E, Perkins MD, McNeil M, Chatterjee D, et al. Estimation of D-arabinose by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry as surrogate for mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan in human urine. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0144088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Conesa-Botella A, Loembé MM, Manabe YC, Worodria W, Mazakpwe D, Luzinda K, et al. Urinary lipoarabinomannan as predictor for the tuberculosis immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;58:463–8. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31823801de. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Boehme C, Molokova E, Minja F, Geis S, Loscher T, Maboko L, et al. Detection of mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan with an antigen-capture ELISA in unprocessed urine of Tanzanian patients with suspected tuberculosis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2005;99:893–900. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lawn SD, Edwards DJ, Kranzer K, Vogt M, Bekker LG, Wood R, et al. Urine lipoarabinomannan assay for tuberculosis screening before antiretroviral therapy diagnostic yield and association with immune reconstitution disease. AIDS. 2009;23:1875–80. doi: 10.1097/qad.0b013e32832e05c8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mukundan H, Kumar S, Price DN, Ray SM, Lee YJ, Min S, et al. Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis biomarkers in a sandwich immunoassay format using a waveguide-based optical biosensor. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2012;92:407–16. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2012.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hanifa Y, Fielding KL, Chihota VN, Adonis L, Charalambous S, Karstaedt A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of lateral flow urine LAM assay for TB screening of adults with advanced immunosuppression attending routine HIV care in South Africa. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0156866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Drain PK, Losina E, Coleman SM, Giddy J, Ross D, Katz JN, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a point-of-care urine test for tuberculosis screening among newly-diagnosed HIV-infected adults: A prospective, clinic-based study. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Peter JG, Theron G, Muchinga TE, Govender U, Dheda K. Diagnostic accuracy of a urine LAM strip-test for TB detection in HIV-infected hospitalized patients. Eur Respir J. 2012;40:1211–20. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00201711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lawn SD, Kerkhoff AD, Vogt M, Wood R. Diagnostic accuracy of a low-cost, urine antigen, point-of-care screening assay for HIV-associated pulmonary tuberculosis before antiretroviral therapy: A descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:201–9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70251-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Savolainen L, Kantele A, Sandboge B, Sirén M, Valleala H, Tuompo R, et al. Modification of clearview tuberculosis (TB) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for TB patients not infected with HIV. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013;20:1479–82. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00375-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kerkhoff AD, Wood R, Vogt M, Lawn SD. Prognostic value of a quantitative analysis of lipoarabinomannan in urine from patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e103285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nakiyingi L, Ssengooba W, Nakanjako D, Armstrong D, Holshouser M, Kirenga BJ, et al. Predictors and outcomes of mycobacteremia among HIV-infected smear- negative presumptive tuberculosis patients in Uganda. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:62. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0812-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shah M, Ssengooba W, Armstrong D, Nakiyingi L, Holshouser M, Ellner JJ, et al. Comparative performance of urinary lipoarabinomannan assays and Xpert MTB/RIF in HIV-infected individuals. AIDS. 2014;28:1307–14. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.North EJ, Jackson M, Lee RE. New approaches to target the mycolic acid biosynthesis pathway for the development of tuberculosis therapeutics. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20:4357–78. doi: 10.2174/1381612819666131118203641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Korb VC, Chuturgoon AA, Moodley D. Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Manipulator of protective immunity. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:131. doi: 10.3390/ijms17030131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Barkan D, Hedhli D, Yan HG, Huygen K, Glickman MS. Mycobacterium tuberculosis lacking all mycolic acid cyclopropanation is viable but highly attenuated and hyperinflammatory in mice. Infect Immun. 2012;80:1958–68. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00021-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Glickman MS, Cox JS, Jacobs WR., Jr A novel mycolic acid cyclopropane synthetase is required for cording, persistence, and virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Cell. 2000;5:717–27. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80250-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gernaey AM, Minnikin DE, Copley MS, Dixon RA, Middleton JC, Roberts CA, et al. Mycolic acids and ancient DNA confirm an osteological diagnosis of tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2001;81:259–65. doi: 10.1054/tube.2001.0295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Borowska-Struginska B, Druszczynska M, Lorkiewicz W, Szewczyk R, Zadzinska E. Mycolic acids as markers of osseous tuberculosis in the Neolithic Skeleton from Kujawy region (central Poland) Anthropol Rev. 2014;77:137–49. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ndlandla FL, Ejoh V, Stoltz AC, Naicker B, Cromarty AD, van Wyngaardt S, et al. Standardization of natural mycolic acid antigen composition and production for use in biomarker antibody detection to diagnose active tuberculosis. J Immunol Methods. 2016;435:50–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Thanyani ST, Roberts V, Siko DGR, Vrey P, Verschoor JA. A novel application of affinity biosensor technology to detect antibodies to mycolic acid in tuberculosis patients. J Immunol Methods. 2008;332:61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2007.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lemmer Y, Thanyani ST, Vrey PJ, Driver CHS, Venter L, van Wyngaardt S, et al. Chapter 5-detection of antimycolic acid antibodies by liposomal biosensors. Methods Enzymol. 2009;464:79–104. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)64005-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Furlanetto LV, Conte-Junior CA, de Souza Figueiredo EE, Duarte RS, Lilenbaum W, Silva JT, et al. HPLC protocol for identification of Mycobacterium spp. from clinical samples of human and veterinary. J Microbiol Res. 2014;4:193–200. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jeong J, Kim SR, Lee SH, Lim JH, Choi JI, Park JS, et al. The use of high performance liquid chromatography to speciate and characterize the epidemiology of mycobacteria. Lab Med. 2011;42:612–7. doi: 10.1309/LMDDEHPSYE6ZDM3C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Song SH, Park KU, Lee JH, Kim EC, Kim JQ, Song J, et al. Electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of the mycolic acid profiles for the identification of common clinical isolates of Mycobacterial species. J Microbiol Methods. 2009;77:165–77. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Szewczyk R, Kowalski K, Janiszewska-Drobinska B, Druszczyńska M. Rapid method for Mycobacterium tuberculosis identification using electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry analysis of mycolic acids. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;76:298–305. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rivera-Betancourt OE, Karls R, Grosse-Siestrup B, Helms S, Quinn F, Dluhy RA, et al. Identification of mycobacteria based on spectroscopic analyses of mycolic acid profiles. Analyst. 2013;138:6774–85. doi: 10.1039/c3an01157g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shui G, Bendt AK, Jappar IA, Lim HM, Laneelle M, Hervé M, et al. Mycolic acids as diagnostic markers for tuberculosis case detection in humans and drug efficacy in mice. EMBO Mol Med. 2012;4:27–37. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201100185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dang NA, Kuijper S, Walters E, Claassens M, van Soolingen D, Vivo-Truyols G, et al. Validation of biomarkers for distinguishing Mycobacterium tuberculosis from non-tuberculous mycobacteria using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and chemometrics. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mark L, Patonai Z, Vaczy A, Lorand T, Mercsik A. High-throughput mass spectrometric analysis of 1400-year-old mycolic acids as biomarkers for ancient tuberculosis infection. J Archaeol Sci. 2010;37:302–5. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Świerzko AS, Bartłomiejczyk MA, Brzostek A, Łukasiewicz J, Michalski M, Dziadek J, et al. Mycobacterial antigen 85 complex (Ag85) as a target for ficolins and mannose-binding lectin. Int J Med Microbiol. 2016;306:212–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tang X, Deng W, Xie J. Novel insights into Mycobacterium antigen ag85 biology and implications in countermeasures for M. tuberculosis. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2012;22:179–87. doi: 10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v22.i3.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ronning DR, Klabunde T, Besra GS, Vissa VD, Belisle JT, Sacchettini JC, et al. Crystal structure of the secreted form of antigen 85C reveals potential targets for mycobacterial drugs and vaccines. Nat Struct Biol. 2000;7:141–6. doi: 10.1038/72413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Armitige LY, Jagannath C, Wanger AR, Norris SJ. Disruption of the genes encoding antigen 85A and antigen 85B of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv: Effect on growth in culture and in macrophages. Infect Immun. 2000;68:767–78. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.2.767-778.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kashyap RS, Dobos KM, Belisle JT, Purohit HJ, Chandak NH, Taori GM, et al. Demonstration of components of antigen 85 complex in cerebrospinal fluid of tuberculous meningitis patients. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005;12:752–8. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.12.6.752-758.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wallis RS, Phillips M, Johnson JL, Teixeira L, Rocha LM, Maciel E, et al. Inhibition of isoniazid-induced expression of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen 85 in sputum: Potential surrogate marker in tuberculosis chemotherapy trials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:1302–4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.4.1302-1304.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Odutola AA, Owolabi OA, Owiafe PK, McShane H, Ota MO. A new TB vaccine, MVA85A, induces durable antigen-specific responses 14 months after vaccination in African infants. Vaccine. 2012;30:5591–4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Brennan MJ, Stone MR, Evans T. A rational vaccine pipeline for tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16:1566–73. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kashyap RS, Rajan AN, Ramteke SS, Agrawal VS, Kelkar SS, Purohit HJ, et al. Diagnosis of tuberculosis in an Indian population by an indirect ELISA protocol based on detection of Antigen 85 complex: A prospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Desjardin LE, Perkins MD, Wolski K, Haun S, Teixeira L, Chen Y, et al. Measurement of sputum Mycobacterium tuberculosis messenger RNA as a surrogate for response to chemotherapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:203–10. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.1.9811006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Syhre M, Chambers ST. The scent of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2008;88:317–23. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Phillips M, Basa-Dalay V, Bothamley G, Cataneo RN, Lam PK, Natividad MPR, et al. Breath biomarkers of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2010;90:145–51. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2010.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Syhre M, Manning L, Phuanukoonnon S, Harino P, Chambers ST. The scent of Mycobacterium tuberculosis – Part II breath. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2009;89:263–6. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2009.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bamogo W, Mugherli L, Banyasz A, Novelli-Rousseau A, Mallard F, Tran-Thi TH, et al. Assessment of terbium (III) as a luminescent probe for the detection of tuberculosis biomarkers. Anal Chim Acta. 2015;896:143–51. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Scott-Thomas A, Syhre M, Epton M, Murdoch DR, Chambers ST. Assessment of potential causes of falsely positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis breath test. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2013;93:312–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2013.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nawrath T, Mgode GF, Weetjens B, Kaufmann SH, Schulz S. The volatiles of pathogenic and nonpathogenic mycobacteria and related bacteria. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2012;8:290–9. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.8.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Cheepsattayakorn A, Cheepsattayakorn R. Breath tests in respiratory and critical care medicine: From research to practice in current perspectives. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:702896. doi: 10.1155/2013/702896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Jassal MS, Nedeltchev GG, Lee JH, Choi SW, Atudorei V, Sharp ZD, et al. 13[C]-urea breath test as a novel point-of-care biomarker for tuberculosis treatment and diagnosis. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Scott LE, McCarthy K, Gous N, Nduna M, Van Rie A, Sanne I, et al. Comparison of Xpert MTB/RIF with other nucleic acid technologies for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis in a high HIV prevalence setting: A prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chang K, Lu W, Wang J, Zhang K, Jia S, Li F, et al. Rapid and effective diagnosis of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance with Xpert MTB/RIF assay: A meta-analysis. J Infect. 2012;64:580–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Theron G, Peter J, van Zyl-Smit R, Mishra H, Streicher E, Murray S, et al. Evaluation of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in a high HIV prevalence setting. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:132–40. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201101-0056OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Labugger I, Heyckendorf J, Dees S, Häussinger E, Herzmann C, Kohl TA, et al. Detection of transrenal DNA for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and treatment monitoring. Infection. 2017;45:269–76. doi: 10.1007/s15010-016-0955-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Green C, Huggett JF, Talbot E, Mwaba P, Reither K, Zumla AI, et al. Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis through the detection of mycobacterial DNA in urine by nucleic acid amplification methods. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:505–11. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70149-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Petrucci R, Lombardi G, Corsini I, Visciotti F, Pirodda A, Cazzato S, et al. Use of transrenal DNA for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in children: A case of tubercular otitis media. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:336–8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02548-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Cannas A, Goletti D, Girardi E, Chiacchio T, Calvo L, Cuzzi G, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection in soluble fraction of urine from pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12:146–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Heydari AA, Movahhede Danesh MR, Ghazvini K. Urine PCR evaluation to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014;7:e9311. doi: 10.5812/jjm.9311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Torrea G, Van de Perre P, Ouedraogo M, Zougba A, Sawadogo A, Dingtoumda B, et al. PCR-based detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in urine of HIV-infected and uninfected pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients in Burkina Faso. J Med Microbiol. 2005;54:39–44. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45688-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Parida SK, Kaufmann SHE. The quest for biomarkers in tuberculosis. Drug Discov Today. 2010;15:148–57. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Tucci P, González-Sapienza G, Marin M. Pathogen-derived biomarkers for active tuberculosis diagnosis. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:549. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Gardiner JL, Karp CL. Transformative tools for tackling tuberculosis. J Exp Med. 2015;212:1759–69. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Frediani JK, Jones DP, Tukvadze N, Uppal K, Sanikidze E, Kipiani M, et al. Plasma metabolomics in human pulmonary tuberculosis disease: A pilot study. PLoS One. 2014;9:e108854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Mahapatra S, Hess AM, Johnson JL, Eisenach KD, DeGroote MA, Gitta P, et al. A metabolic biosignature of early response to anti-tuberculosis treatment. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
