Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biodiversity Data Journal logoLink to Biodiversity Data Journal
. 2018 Apr 25;(6):e23555. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.6.e23555

Species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders I: Agelenidae to Filistatidae

Sini Seppälä 1,2, Sérgio Henriques 3,4,2, Michael L Draney 5,2, Stefan Foord 6,2, Alastair T Gibbons 2,7, Luz A Gomez 8,2, Sarah Kariko 9,2, Jagoba Malumbres-Olarte 10,2, Marc Milne 11,2, Cor J Vink 12,2, Pedro Cardoso 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC5932090  PMID: 29725239

Abstract Abstract

Background

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most widely used information source on the extinction risk of species. One of the uses of the Red List is to evaluate and monitor the state of biodiversity and a possible approach for this purpose is the Red List Index (RLI). For many taxa, mainly hyperdiverse groups, it is not possible within available resources to assess all known species. In such cases, a random sample of species might be selected for assessment and the results derived from it extrapolated for the entire group - the Sampled Red List Index (SRLI). With the current contribution and the three following papers, we intend to create the first point in time of a future spider SRLI encompassing 200 species distributed across the world.

New information

A sample of 200 species of spiders were randomly selected from the World Spider Catalogue, an updated global database containing all recognised species names for the group. The 200 selected species where divided taxonomically at the family level and the familes were ordered alphabetically. In this publication, we present the conservation profiles of 46 species belonging to the famillies alphabetically arranged between Agelenidae and Filistatidae, which encompassed Agelenidae, Amaurobiidae, Anyphaenidae, Araneidae, Archaeidae, Barychelidae, Clubionidae, Corinnidae, Ctenidae, Ctenizidae, Cyatholipidae, Dictynidae, Dysderidae, Eresidae and Filistatidae.

Introduction

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most widely used information source on the extinction risk of species (Lamoreux et al. 2003, Rodrigues et al. 2006, Mace et al. 2008 but see Cardoso et al. 2011, Cardoso et al. 2012). It is based on a number of objective criteria, which are relatively easy to apply when adequate information is available (IUCN 2001). The Red List has been used to raise awareness about threatened species, guide conservation efforts and funding, set priorities for protection, measure site irreplaceability and vulnerability and influence environmental policies and legislation (Gardenfors et al. 2001, Rodrigues et al. 2006, Mace et al. 2008, Martín-López et al. 2009).

One of the uses of the Red List is to evaluate and monitor the state of biodiversity and a possible approach for this purpose is the Red List Index (RLI). The RLI helps to develop a better understanding of which taxa, regions or ecosystems are declining or improving their conservation status. It provides policy makers, stakeholders, conservation practitioners and the general public with sound knowledge of biodiversity status and change and tools with which to make informed decisions. The RLI uses weight scores based on the Red List status of each of the assessed species. These scores range from 0 (Least Concern) to 5 (Extinct/Extinct in the Wild). Summing these scores across all species, relating them to the worst-case scenario - all species extinct and comparing two or more points in time gives us an indication of how biodiversity is doing. At a global level, the RLI has been calculated for birds (Butchart et al. 2004, Hoffman et al. 2010), mammals (Hoffman et al. 2011), amphibians (Hoffman et al. 2010), corals (Butchart 2010) and cycads (United Nations 2015).

For many taxa, mainly hyperdiverse groups, it is not possible within available resources to assess all known species. In such cases, a random sample of species might be selected for assessment and the results derived from it extrapolated for the entire group - the Sampled Red List Index (SRLI, Baillie et al. 2008). The SRLI is now being developed for plants (Brummitt et al. 2015) and efforts towards a SRLI for butterflies (Lewis and Senior 2011) and Odonata are also in progress (Clausnitzer 2009).

Spiders currently comprise over 47000 species described at a global level (World Spider Catalog 2018). Of these, only 199 species (0.4%) have been assessed (www.redlist.org), of which the vast majority are from the Seychelles Islands or belong to the golden-orb weavers, Nephilidae (e.g. Kuntner et al. 2017). To these, a large number will be added in the near future, such as 55 species endemic to the Madeira and Selvagens archipelagos and 25 endemic to the Azores, all in Portugal (Cardoso et al. 2017, Borges et al. submitted). The vast majority of spiders assessed to date are therefore either regionally or taxonomically clustered and do not represent the group as a whole. With the current contribution and the three following papers, we intend to create the first point in time of a future spider SRLI encompassing 200 species distributed across the world.

Methods

A sample of 200 species of spiders were randomly selected from the World Spider Catalog (2018), an updated global database containing all recognised species names for the group. The 200 selected species were divided taxonomically at the family level and those familes were ordered alphabetically. In this publication, we present the conservation profiles of 46 species belonging to the families alphabetically arranged between Agelenidae and Filistatidae, which encompassed Agelenidae, Amaurobiidae, Anyphaenidae, Araneidae, Archaeidae, Barychelidae, Clubionidae, Corinnidae, Ctenidae, Ctenizidae, Cyatholipidae, Dictynidae, Dysderidae, Eresidae and Filistatidae.

Species data were collected from all taxonomic bibliography available at the World Spider Catalog (2018), complemented by data in other publications found through Google Scholar and georeferrenced points made available through the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (www.gbif.org) and also other sources (https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org; https://login.webofknowledge.com; http://srs.britishspiders.org.uk; http://symbiota4.acis.ufl.edu/scan/portal; https://lepus.unine.ch; http://www.tuite.nl/iwg/Araneae/SpiBenelux/?species; https://atlas.arages.de; https://arachnology.cz/rad/araneae-1.html; http://www.ennor.org/iberia/). Whenever possible, with each species record, we also collected additional information, namely habitat type and spatial error of coordinates.

For all analyses, we used the R package red - IUCN redlisting tools (Cardoso 2017). This package performs a number of spatial analyses based on either observed occurrences or estimated ranges. Functions include calculating Extent of Occurrence (EOO), Area of Occupancy (AOO), mapping species ranges, species distribution modelling using climate and land cover information, calculating the Red List Index for groups of species, amongst others. In this work, the EOO and AOO were calculated in one of two ways:

- for range restricted species, for which we assumed knowledge of the full range, these values were classified as observed, the minimum convex polygon encompassing all observations used to calculate the EOO and the 2 km x 2 km cells known to be occupied and used to calculate the AOO. When the EOO was smaller than the AOO, it was made equal as per the IUCN guidelines (IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee 2017).

- for widespread species or those for which we did not have confidence to know the full range, we performed species distribution modelling (SDM). This was done based on both climatic (Fick and Hijmans 2017) and landcover (Tuanmu and Jetz 2014) datasets, at an approximately 1x1 km resolution. Before modelling, the world layers were cropped to the region of interest to each species and reduced to four layers through a PCA to avoid overfitting. In addition, latitude and longitude were used as two extra layers to avoid the models predicting presences much beyond the known region following the precautionary principle. We then used the Maxent method (Phillips et al. 2006) implemented in the R package red. Isolated patches outside the original distribution polygon were excluded from maps to avoid overestimation of EOO and AOO values. All final maps and values were checked and validated by our own expert opinion. KMLs derived from these maps were also produced using the red package. The cells (2x2 km) predicted to be occupied were used to calculate the AOO. When the EOO was smaller than the AOO, it was made equal as per the IUCN guidelines (IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee 2017).

To infer on possible changes in range and/or abundance and for forest species only, we have also consulted the Global Forest Watch portal (Global Forest Watch 2014), looking for changes in forest cover during the last 10 years that could have affected the species.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material 1

Distribution of Coelotes amamiensis Shimojana, 1989

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170192.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s001.kml (21.6KB, kml)
Supplementary material 2

Distribution of Hololena hopi (Chamberlin & Ivie, 1942)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170191.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s002.kml (7.6KB, kml)
Supplementary material 3

Distribution of Oramia occidentalis (Marples, 1959)

Cardoso, P.Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170202.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s003.kml (4.1KB, kml)
Supplementary material 4

Distribution of Amaurobius transversus Leech, 1972

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170203.kml

Supplementary material 5

Distribution of Callobius pauculus Leech, 1972

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170204.kml

Supplementary material 6

Distribution of Thaloe ennery Brescovit, 1993

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170205.kml

Supplementary material 7

Distribution of Timbuka meridiana (L. Koch, 1866)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170206.kml

Supplementary material 8

Distribution of Wulfila fragilis Chickering, 1937

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170207.kml

Supplementary material 9

Distribution of Wulfila inornatus (O. P.-Cambridge, 1898)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170208.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s009.kml (7.6KB, kml)
Supplementary material 10

Distribution of Alpaida alticeps (Keyserling, 1879)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170201.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s010.kml (37.7KB, kml)
Supplementary material 11

Distribution of Alpaida veniliae (Keyserling, 1865)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170209.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s011.kml (369.1KB, kml)
Supplementary material 12

Distribution of Araneus camilla (Simon, 1889)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170210.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s012.kml (7.4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 13

Distribution of Araneus praedatus (O. P.-Cambridge, 1885)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_174088.kml

Supplementary material 14

Distribution of Cyclosa bianchoria Yin et al, 1990

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170212.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s014.kml (89.3KB, kml)
Supplementary material 15

Distribution of Cyclosa nevada Levi, 1999

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170213.kml

Supplementary material 16

Distribution of Cyrtarachne hubeiensis Yin & Zhao, 1994

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170214.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s016.kml (3.9KB, kml)
Supplementary material 17

Distribution of Gea spinipes L. Koch, 1843

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170215.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s017.kml (230.3KB, kml)
Supplementary material 18

Distribution of Larinia jeskovi Marusik, 1987

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170216.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s018.kml (1,018.7KB, kml)
Supplementary material 19

Distribution of Mangora falconae Schenkel, 1953

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170217.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s019.kml (29.1KB, kml)
Supplementary material 20

Distribution of Metazygia enabla Levi, 1995

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170218.kml

Supplementary material 21

Distribution of Metazygia octama Levi, 1995

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170220.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s021.kml (14.8KB, kml)
Supplementary material 22

Distribution of Metepeira ventura Chamberlin and Ivie, 1942

Pedro Cardoso

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170221.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s022.kml (63.2KB, kml)
Supplementary material 23

Distribution of Neoscona goliath (Benoit, 1963)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170222.kml

Supplementary material 24

Distribution of Ocrepeida verecunda Levi, 1995

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170223.kml

Supplementary material 25

Distribution of Plebs cyphoxis (Simon, 1908)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170224.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s025.kml (47.1KB, kml)
Supplementary material 26

Distribution of Tatepeira itu Levi, 1995

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170225.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s026.kml (2.2MB, kml)
Supplementary material 27

Distribution of Wagneriana yacuma Levi, 1991

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170226.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s027.kml (11.5KB, kml)
Supplementary material 28

Distribution of Austrarchaea platnickorum Rix & Harvey, 2011

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170227.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s028.kml (11.2KB, kml)
Supplementary material 29

Distribution of Zephyrarchaea marae Rix & Harvey, 2012

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170228.kml

Supplementary material 30

Distribution of Aurecocrypta lugubris Raven, 1994

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170229.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s030.kml (32.8KB, kml)
Supplementary material 31

Mandjela fleckeri Raven & Churchill, 1994

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170230.kml

Supplementary material 32

Distribution of Nihoa kaindi Raven, 1994

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170231.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s032.kml (3.9KB, kml)
Supplementary material 33

Distribution of Clubiona bifissurata Kritscher, 1966

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170232.kml

Supplementary material 34

Distribution of Clubiona frisia Wunderlich & Schuett, 1995

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_171382.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s034.kml (206.5KB, kml)
Supplementary material 35

Distribution of Clubiona pyrifera Schenkel, 1936

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170234.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s035.kml (10.9KB, kml)
Supplementary material 36

Distribution of Apochinomma nitidum (Thorell, 1895)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170235.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s036.kml (156.1KB, kml)
Supplementary material 37

Distribution of Corinna venezuelica (Caporiacco, 1955)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170236.kml

Supplementary material 38

Distribution of Acantheis variatus Thorell, 1890

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170237.kml

Supplementary material 39

Distribution of Phoneutria keyserlingi (F. O. P.-Cambridge, 1897)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170238.kml

Supplementary material 40

Dsitribution of Vulsor sextus Strand, 1907

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170240.kml

Supplementary material 41

Distribution of Stasimopus nanus Tucker, 1917

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170241.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s041.kml (7.6KB, kml)
Supplementary material 42

Distribution of Ilisoa hawequas Griswold, 1987

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170242.kml

Supplementary material 43

Distribution of Argenna polita (Banks, 1898)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170243.kml

Supplementary material 44

Distribution of Rhode baborensis Beladjal & Bosmans, 1996

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_171412.kml

Supplementary material 45

Distribution of Eresus kollari Rossi, 1846

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170748.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s045.kml (60.7KB, kml)
Supplementary material 46

Distribution of Tricalamus jiangxiensis Li, 1994

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170245.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s046.kml (7.4KB, kml)

Acknowledgements

We thank Michael Rix and Marjan Komnenov for providing data and insights on numerous species. Paulo Borges and Mário Boieiro for their constructive comments on a previous draft. Paula Cushing helped organising a redlisting workshop during the XXth International Congress of Arachnology, Golden, Colorado, July 2016, where this project started. The Chicago Zoological Society CBOT Endangered Species Fund made such a workshop possible through targeted funding.

References

  1. Almquist S. Thermal tolerances and preferences of some dune-living spiders. Oikos. 1970;21:230–235. doi: 10.2307/3543678. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almquist S. Swedish Araneae. Part 2. Families Dictynidae to Salticidae. Insect Systematics & Evolution. Vol. 63. Supplement.; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Baillie J E M, Collen B, Amin R., Akcakaya H R, Butchart S H M, Brummitt N A, Meagher T R, Ram M, Hilton-Taylor C, Mace G M. Toward monitoring global biodiversity. Conservation Letters. 2008;1:18–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00009.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Banks N. Arachnida from Baja California and other parts of Mexico. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences. 1898;1:205–308. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumann T. Populationsökologische und zönotische Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung von Habitatqualität und Habitatfragmentierung für Spinnenpopulationen auf Trockenrasen am Beispiel von Eresus cinnaberinus (Oliv. 1789) Universitat Bremen; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  6. Beladjal L., Bosmans R., Maelfait J. P. Le genre Rhode Simon dans le Maghreb (Araneae, Dysderidae) file:///C:/Users/siseppal/Downloads/8154_Beladjal_Bosmans_&_Maelfait_1996_Rev_11_65_75%20(1).pdf Revue Arachnologique. 1996;11:65–75. [Google Scholar]
  7. Benjamin S. P., Nanayakkara R. P., Dayananda S. K. The taxonomy and conservation status of the spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) in Sri Lanka. The National Red List 2012 of Sri Lanka. 2012;42 [Google Scholar]
  8. Benoit P. L. G. Araneidae-Nephilinae africains nouveaux ou peu connus. Revue de Zoologie et de Botanique Africaines. 1963;67:29–32. [Google Scholar]
  9. Berman J. D., Levi H. W. The orb weaver genus Neoscona in North America (Araneae: Araneidae) Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. 1971;141:465–500. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonaldo A. B., Brescovit A. D., Höfer H., Gasnier T. R., Lise A. A. A araneofauna (Arachnida, Araneae) da Reserva Florestal Ducke, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil. Estado Atual do Conhecimento Taxonômico e Biológico. 2009;1:201–222. [Google Scholar]
  11. Brescovit A. D. Thaloe e Bromelina, novos gêneros de aranhas neotropicais da família Anyphaenidae (Arachnida, Araneae) Revista Brasileira de Entomologia. 1993;37:693–703. [Google Scholar]
  12. Brescovit A. D. Revisão de Anyphaeninae Bertkau a nivel de gêneros na região Neotropical (Araneae, Anyphaenidae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 1997;13(1):1–187. doi: 10.1590/S0101-81751996000500001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brummitt N., Bachman S. P., Aletrari E., Chadburn H., Griffiths-Lee J., Lutz M., Lughadha E. M. N. The sampled red list index for plants, phase II: ground-truthing specimen-based conservation assessments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2015;370(1662):20140015. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Buchholz Sascha, Schröder Maria. Diversity and ecology of spider assemblages of a Mediterranean wetland complex. http://dx.doi.org/10.1636/p13-26.1. Journal of Arachnology. 2013;41(3):364–373. doi: 10.1636/p13-26.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Buckup Erica Helena, Pinto-da-Rocha Ricardo. On the males of Wagneriana roraima Levi and W. yacuma Levi (Araneae, Araneidae) http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0101-81751996000400006. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 1996;13(4):849–852. doi: 10.1590/s0101-81751996000400006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Butchart S. H. M., Stattersfield A. J., Bennun L. A., Shutes S. M., Akçakaya H. R., Baillie J. E. M., Stuart S. N., Hilton- Taylor C., Mace G. M. Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: red list indices for birds. PloS Biol. 2004 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  17. Butchart S. H. M. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science. 2010;328:1164–1168. doi: 10.1126/science.1187512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Caporiacco L. Di. Estudios sobre los aracnidos de Venezuela. 2a parte: Araneae. Acta Biologica Venezuelica. 1955;1:265–448. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cardoso P., Borges P. A. V., Triantis K. A., Ferrández M. A., Martín J. L. Adapting the IUCN Red List criteria for invertebrates. Biological Conservation. 2011;144:2432–2440. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cardoso P., Borges P. A. V., Triantis K. A., Ferrández M. A., Martín J. L. The underrepresentation and misrepresentation of invertebrates in the IUCN Red List. Biological Conservation. 2012;149:147–148. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.02.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cardoso P. Red - an R package to facilitate species red list assessments according to the IUCN criteria. Biodiversity Data Journal. 2017;5:e20530. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.5.e20530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cardoso Pedro, Crespo Luís, Silva Isamberto, Borges Paulo, Boieiro Mário. Species conservation profiles of endemic spiders (Araneae) from Madeira and Selvagens archipelagos, Portugal. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/bdj.5.e20810. Biodiversity Data Journal. 2017;5:e20810. doi: 10.3897/bdj.5.e20810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Carmona Eusebio Cano, Ortiz Ana Cano. Establishment of biogeographic areas by distributing endemic flora and habitats (Dominican Republic, Haiti R.) InTech, editor. Global Advances in Biogeography 2012
  24. Cartan Claire K., Miyashita Tadashi. Extraordinary web and silk properties of Cyrtarachne (Araneae, Araneidae): a possible link between orb-webs and bolas. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01255.x. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2000;71(2):219–235. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2000.tb01255.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chakrabarti S. Gea spinipes C. L. Koch, 1843 (Araneae: Araneidae) found in western Himalaya, India. Turkish Journal of Arachnology. 2009;1:128–132. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chamberlin Ralph V., Ivie Wilton. Agelenidae of the genera Hololena, Novalena, Rualena, and Melpomene. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aesa/35.2.203. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 1942;35(2):203–241. doi: 10.1093/aesa/35.2.203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chamberlin R. V., Ivie W. A hundred new species of American spiders. Bulletin of the University of Utah. 1942;32(1):1–117. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chang Yung-Hau, Chang Hsueh-Wen. Gea spinipes C.L. Koch, 1843 (Araneae: Araneidae), a new addition to Taiwan fauna. http://dx.doi.org/10.2476/asjaa.46.83. Acta Arachnologica. 1997;46(2):83–85. doi: 10.2476/asjaa.46.83. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen X. E., Gao J. C. The Sichuan farmland spiders in China. Sichuan Science and Technology Publishing House; Chengdu: 1990. 226 [Google Scholar]
  30. Chickering A. M. Anyphaenidae of Barro Colorado Island, Panama Canal Zone. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts and Letters. 1937;22:541–561. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chou I. C., Wang P. H., Shen P. S., Tso I. M. A test of prey-attracting and predator defence functions of prey carcass decorations built by Cyclosa spiders. Animal Behaviour. 2005;69(5):1055–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.09.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Clausnitzer V. Odonata enter the biodiversity crisis debate: the first global assessment of an insect group. Biological Conservation. 2009;142:1864–1869. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Comstock J. H. The Spider Book. Comstock Publishing, Ithaca; New York: 1948. [Google Scholar]
  34. Dawson I. K., Harvey P. R., Merrett P., Russell-Smith A. R. A review of the scarce and threatened spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of Great Britain. http://srs.britishspiders.org.uk/portal.php/p/Summary/s/Eresus%20sandaliatus (In preparation) 2017
  35. Dawson I. K., Harvey P. R., Merrett P., Russell-Smith A. R. A review of the scarce and threatened spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of Great Britain. http://srs.britishspiders.org.uk/portal.php/p/Summary/s/Clubiona%20frisia In preparation. 2017
  36. Deeleman-Reinhold Christa. Forest Spiders of South East Asia With a revision of the sac and ground spiders (Araneae: Clubionidae, Corinnidae, Liocranidae, Gnaphosidae, Prodidomidae and Trochanterriidae). http://dx.doi.org/10.15468/D71SMQ. Plazi.org taxonomic treatments database. 2001 doi: 10.15468/D71SMQ. [DOI]
  37. Dias S. C., Brescovit A. D., Couto E. C., Martins C. F. Species richness and seasonality of spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) in an urban Atlantic Forest fragment in Northeastern Brazil. Urban Ecosystems. 2006;9(4):323–335. doi: 10.1007/s11252-006-0002-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Dippenaar-Schoeman A. S., Jocqué R. African spiders: an identification manual. ARC-Plant Protection Research Institute; Pretoria: 1997. 392 [Google Scholar]
  39. Dolisca F., McDaniel J. M., Teeter L. D., Jolly C. M. Land tenure, population pressure, and deforestation in Haiti: the case of Forêt des Pins Reserve. Journal of Forest Economics. 2007;13(4):277–289. doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2007.02.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dyal S. Fauna of Lahore. 4. Spiders of Lahore. Bulletin of the Department of Zoology of the Panjab University. 1935;1:119–252. [Google Scholar]
  41. Eickstedt V. R. D. von. Estudo sistemático de Phoneutria nigriventer (Keyserling, 1891) e Phoneutria keyserlingi (Pickard-Cambridge, 1897) (Araneae; Labidognatha; Ctenidae) Memórias do Instituto Butantan. 1981;42/43:95–126. [Google Scholar]
  42. Fick S E, Hijmans R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086. International Journal of Climatology. 2017;37(12):4302–4315. doi: 10.1002/joc.5086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gardenfors Ulf, Hilton-Taylor Craig, Mace G. M., Rodriguez Jon Paul. The application of IUCN red list criteria at regional levels. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00112.x. Conservation Biology. 2001;15(5):1206–1212. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00112.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Secretariat GBIF. GBIF.org; 2016. [2017-10-02T00:00:00+03:00]. Hololena hopi Chamberlin & Ivie, 1942 in GBIF Secretariat (2016). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist Dataset. [Google Scholar]
  45. Secretariat GBIF. Metazygia enabla Levi, 1995 in GBIF Secretariat (2016). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist Dataset accessed via GBIF.org on 2017-10-04. 10.15468/39omei 2016
  46. Secretariat GBIF. Metazygia octama Levi, 1995 in GBIF Secretariat (2016). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist Dataset accessed via GBIF.org on 2017-10-04. https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei
  47. Secretariat GBIF. Cyclosa bianchoria Yin et al., 1990 in GBIF Secretariat (2016). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist Dataset accessed via GBIF.org on 2017-10-05. https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei
  48. Secretariat GBIF. Clubiona frisia Wunderlich & Schuett, 1995 in GBIF Secretariat (2016). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist Dataset accessed via GBIF.org on 2017-10-05. https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei
  49. Secretariat GBIF. Gea spinipes C. L. Koch, 1843 in GBIF Secretariat (2016). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist Dataset accessed via GBIF.org on 2017-10-04. https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei
  50. Secretariat GBIF. Alpaida veniliae (Keyserling, 1865) in GBIF Secretariat (2017). GBIF28/11/2017 Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist Dataset accessed via GBIF.org on 28/11/2017. https://doi.org/10.5072/hufs9m
  51. Watch Global Forest. World Resources Institute. www.globalforestwatch.org. [2017-09-18T00:00:00+03:00];
  52. Gonçalves-Souza T. Estudo da Diversidade de Aranhas (Arachnida, Araneae) de Santa Teresa, Região Centro-Serrana do Espírito Santo: check-list, avaliação dos efeitos de borda e do tamanho da área. Escola Superior São Francisco de Assis - ESFA 2005
  53. Griswold C. E. A review of the southern African spiders of the family Cyatholipidae Simon, 1894 (Araneae: Araneomorphae) Annals of the Natal Museum. 1987:499–542.
  54. Hajian-Forooshani Zachary, Gonthier D. J., Marín Linda, Iverson A. L., Perfecto Ivette. Changes in species diversity of arboreal spiders in Mexican coffee agroecosystems: untangling the web of local and landscape influences driving diversity. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.623. PeerJ. 2014;2:e623. doi: 10.7717/peerj.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Harrod J. C., Levi H. W., Leibensperger L. B. The neotropical orbweavers of the genus Larinia (Araneae: Araneidae) Psyche. 1990;97(3-4):241–265. doi: 10.1155/1990/25941. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Höfer H., Brescovit A. D. Species and guild structure of a Neotropical spider assemblage (Araneae) from Reserva Ducke, Amazonas, Brazil. Andrias. 2001;15:99–119. [Google Scholar]
  57. Hoffman M., Hilton-Taylor C., Angulo A., Bohm M., Brooks T. M. al. The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science. 2010;330:1496–1501. doi: 10.1126/science.1194442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Hoffman M., Belant J. L., Chanson J. S., Cox N. A., Lamoreux J., Rodrigues A. S.L., Schipper J., Stuart S. N. The changing fates of the world’s mammals. Philos T Roy Soc B. 2011;366:2598–2610. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Hu J. L. The Chinese spiders collected from the fields and the forests. Tianjin Press of Science and Techniques; 1984. 482 [Google Scholar]
  60. Hu Y. J. [Common clubionids found in paddy fields] Journal of Hunan Teachers College. 1979;1979(1):64–72. [Google Scholar]
  61. IUCN IUCN RedList Categories and Criteria version 3.1. http://www. redlist.org/ technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria. [2011-03-16T00:00:00+02:00];
  62. Subcommittee IUCN Standards and Petitions. Guidelines for using the IUCN RedList categories and criteria. 13. IUCN; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  63. Jocqué R., Dippenaar-Schoeman A. S. Spider families of the world. Royal Museum for Central Africa; Tervuren: 2006. 336 [Google Scholar]
  64. Jones D. Guía de campo de los arácnidos de España y Europa. Omega; Barcelona: 1985. [Google Scholar]
  65. Joseph MM., Framenau V. W. Systematic review of a new orb-weaving spider genus (Araneae: Araneidae), with special reference to the Australasian-Pacific and South-East Asian fauna. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2012;166:279–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00845.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Keeley Jon E., Davis Frank W. Chaparral. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520249554.003.0013. Terrestrial Vegetation of California, 3rd Edition. 2007 doi: 10.1525/california/9780520249554.003.0013. [DOI]
  67. Keyserling E. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Orbitelae Latr. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien. 1865;15:799–856. [Google Scholar]
  68. Kovács G., Prazsák I., Eichardt J., Vári G., Gyurkovics H. A new ladybird spider from Hungary (Araneae, Eresidae) ZooKeys. 2015;494:13–30. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.494.8676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Krause Rolf-H, Wehrden Henrik von, Härdtle Werner, Schuldt Andreas, Assmann Theodor. Stenotopie und Eurytopie – Verteilungsmodelle als Mittel für den Nischenvergleich der Spinnenarten Trochosa terricola und Eresus kollari (Araneae: Lycosidae / Eresidae) http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/entom.gen/34/2013/169. Entomologia Generalis. 2013;34(3):169–180. doi: 10.1127/entom.gen/34/2013/169. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Krause R. H., Buse J., Matern A., Schröder B., Härdtle W., Assmann T. Eresus kollari (Araneae: Eresidae) calls for heathland management. Journal of Arachnology. 2011;39(3):384–392. doi: 10.1636/P10-58.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Krejčí Tomáš, Řezáč Milan, Michalik Peter. Female genital morphology and sperm storage in the velvet spider Eresus kollari (Araneae: Eresidae) http://dx.doi.org/10.1636/b14-53. Journal of Arachnology. 2015;43(2):182–187. doi: 10.1636/b14-53. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kritscher E. Die Pedipalpen- und Araneenausbeute der Österreichischen Neukaledonien-Expedition 1965. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien. 1966;69:373–391. [Google Scholar]
  73. Kuntner M., Rudolf E., Cardoso P. Nephilingis dodo. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T80274377A80274414. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-1.RLTS.T80274377A80274414.en. [2017-11-24T00:00:00+02:00];
  74. Kupryjanowicz J. Larinia jeskovi Marusik, 1986, a spider species new to Europe (Araneae: Araneidae) Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society. 1995;10:78–80. [Google Scholar]
  75. Kupryjanowicz J. Spiders (Araneae) of open habitats in the Biebrza National Park, Poland. Fragmenta Faunistica. 2003;46(2):209–237. doi: 10.3161/00159301FF2003.46.2.209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Kuznetsov G. T. [On the ecology of spiders Eresus niger Pet. and Lithyphantes paykullionus Walck. (Aranei, Eresidae, Theridiidae) in south Turkmenistan.] Unknown; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  77. Labarque F. M., Soto E. M., Ramírez M. J., Arnedo M. A. Chasing ghosts: the phylogeny of Amaurobioidinae ghost spiders (Araneae, Anyphaenidae) Zoologica Scripta. 2015;44:550–561. doi: 10.1111/zsc.12119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Lamoreux J., Akçakaya H. R., Bennun L., Collar N. J., Boitani L., Brackett D., Bräutigam A., Brooks T. M., da Fonseca G. A. B., Mittermeier R. A., Rylands A. B., Gärdenfors U., Hilton-Taylor C., Mace G., Stein B. A., Stuart S. Value of the IUCN red list. http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/pdf/S0169-5347(03)00090-9.pdf. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2003;18(5):214–215. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00090-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Laycock H., Moran D., Smart J., Raffaelli D., White P. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of conservation: The UK Biodiversity Action Plan. Biological. 2009;142(12):3120–3127. [Google Scholar]
  80. Leech R. E. A revision of the Nearctic Amaurobiidae (Arachnida: Araneida) Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada. 1972;84:1–182. [Google Scholar]
  81. Leigh Jr. E. G. Tropical Forest Ecology: A View from Barro Colorado Island. Oxford University Press on Demand; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  82. Leite C. M. P. Aranhas tecedeiras como indicadores ecológicos em florestas tropicais: uma análise em Mata Atlântica. Universidade Federal da Bahia; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  83. Levi Herbert W. The orb weaver genera Argiope, Gea, and Neogea from the western Pacific region (Araneae: Araneidae, Argiopinae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College. 1983;150:247–338. [Google Scholar]
  84. Levi Herbert W. The neotropical orb-weaving spiders of the genera Wixia, Pozonia, and Ocrepeira (Araneae: Araneidae) Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. 1993;153:47–141. [Google Scholar]
  85. Levi H. W. The orb-weaver genera Metepeira, Kaira and Aculepeira in America north of Mexico (Araneae, Araneidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College. 1977;148:185–238. [Google Scholar]
  86. Levi H. W. The neotropical orb-weaving spiders of the genus Alpaida (Araneae: Araneidae) Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College. 1988;151:365–487. [Google Scholar]
  87. Levi H. W. The Neotropical orb-weaver genera Edricus and Wagneriana (Araneae: Araneidae) Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College. 1991;152:363–415. [Google Scholar]
  88. Levi H. W. The Neotropical orb-weaver genus Metazygia (Araneae: Araneidae) Bulletin of the Museum of the Comparative Zoology. 1995;154:63–151. [Google Scholar]
  89. Levi H W. Orb-weaving spiders Actinosoma, Spilasma, Micrepeira, Pronous, and four new genera (Araneae: Araneidae). Bulletin of The Museum of Comparative Zoology. 1995;154:153–213. [Google Scholar]
  90. Levi H. W. The Neotropical and Mexican orb weavers of the genera Cyclosa and Allocyclosa (Araneae: Araneidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College. 1999;155:299–379. [Google Scholar]
  91. Levi H. W. The orb-weaver genus Mangora of Mexico, Central America, and West indies (raneae: Araneidae) http://dx.doi.org/10.3099/0027-4100(2005)158[139:togmom]2.0.co;2. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. 2005;158(4):139–181. doi: 10.3099/0027-4100(2005)158[139:togmom]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Levi H. W. The orb-weaver genus Mangora in South America (Araneae, Araneidae) http://dx.doi.org/10.3099/0027-4100(2007)159[1:towgmi]2.0.co;2. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. 2007;159(1):1–142. doi: 10.3099/0027-4100(2007)159[1:towgmi]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Lewis O. T., Senior M. J.M. Assessing conservation status and trends for the world’s butterflies: the Sampled Red List Index approach. Journal of Insect Conservation. 2011;15:121–128. doi: 10.1007/s10841-010-9329-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  94. Li A. H. On a new species of the genus Tricalamus from Jiangxi, China (Araneae: Filistatidae) Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica. 1994;19:422–425. [Google Scholar]
  95. Liljesthröm G., Minervino E., Castro D., Gonzalez A. La comunidad de arañas del cultivo de soja en la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Neotropical Entomology. 2002;31(2):197–209. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2002000200005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Locket G., Millidge A., Merrett P. British Spiders. Vol III. Ray Society; London: 1974. 315 [Google Scholar]
  97. Mace G. M., Collar N. J., Gaston K. J., Hilton-Taylor C., Akc¸akaya H. R., Leader-Williams N., Milner-Gulland E. J., Stuart S. N. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN’s system for classifying threatened species. Conserv Biol. 2008;22:1424–1442. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01044.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Marples RR. The dictynid spiders of New Zealand. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 1959;87:333–361. [Google Scholar]
  99. Martín-López B., Montes C., Ramírez L., Benayas J. What drives policy decision-making related to species conservation? Biol. Conserv. 2009;142:1370–1380. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  100. Martins R., Bertani R. The non-Amazonian species of the Brazilian wandering spiders of the genus Phoneutria Perty, 1833 (Araneae: Ctenidae), with the description of a new species. Zootaxa. 2007;1526:1–36. [Google Scholar]
  101. Marusik Y. M. The orb-weaver genus Larinia Simon in the USSR. Spixiana. 1986;9:245–254. [Google Scholar]
  102. Mikhailov K. G. A revision of the Chinese sac spiders of the genus Clubiona described by E. Schenkel in 1936 (Aranei Clubionidae) Arthropoda Selecta. 1998;6(3/4):1–314. [Google Scholar]
  103. Mikhailov K. G. The spider genus Clubiona Latreille, 1804 (Aranei: Clubionidae) in the fauna of the former USSR: 2003 update. http://arthropodaselecta.britishspiders.org.uk/articles/11_4_283_317_mikhailov.pdf Arthropoda Selecta. 2002;11(4):283–317. [Google Scholar]
  104. Miyashita Tadashi, Sakamaki Yoshitaka, Shinkai Akira. Evidence against moth attraction by Cyrtarachne, a genus related to bolas spiders. http://dx.doi.org/10.2476/asjaa.50.1. Acta Arachnologica. 2001;50(1):1–4. doi: 10.2476/asjaa.50.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  105. Nogueira A. D. A. Diversidade de aranhas (Arachnida-Araneae) em dois gradientes altitudinais na Amazônia, Amazonas, Brasil. Unknown; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  106. Noordijk J., Sýkora K. V., Schaffers A. P. The conservation value of sandy highway verges for arthropods–implications for management. Proceedings of the Netherlands Entomological Society Meeting. 2008;19:75–93. [Google Scholar]
  107. Heritage Office of Environment and. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) http://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/visit-a-park/parks/new-england-national-park. [2017-10-03T00:00:00+03:00];
  108. Oliger T. I., Marusik Y. M., Koponen S. New and interesting records of spiders (Araneae) from the Maritime Province of Russia. Acta Arachnologica. 2002;51(2):93–98. doi: 10.2476/asjaa.51.93. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  109. Olson D M., Dinerstein Eric, Wikramanayake E. D., Burgess N. D., Powell G. V. N., Underwood E. C., D'amico J. A., Itoua Illanga, Strand H. E., Morrison J. C., Loucks C. J., Allnutt T. F., Ricketts T. H., Kura Yumiko, Lamoreux J. F., Wettengel W. W., Hedao Prashant, Kassem K. R. Terrestrial ecoregions of the World: A new map of life on Earth. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:teotwa]2.0.co;2. BioScience. 2001;51(11):933–938. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:teotwa]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  110. Ordóñez M. M. R., Ramos P. R. Biodiversidad de coleópteros y arañas de las Sierras de Taxco-Huautla. Version 1.3. Comisión nacional para el conocimiento y uso de la biodiversidad. https://doi.org/10.15468/1qcwww Occurrence Dataset. 2017
  111. Peres M. C. L., Cardoso Da Silva J. M., Brescovit A. D. The influence of treefall gaps on the distribution of web‐building and ground hunter spiders in an Atlantic Forest remnant, northeastern Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment. 2007;42:49–60. doi: 10.1080/01650520600891889. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Petrunkevitch A. A synonymic index-catalogue of spiders of North, Central and South America with all adjacent islands, Greenland, Bermuda, West Indies, Terra del Fuego, Galapagos, etc. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 1911;29:1–791. [Google Scholar]
  113. Phillips S. J., Anderson R. P., Schapire R. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling. 2006;190:231–259. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  114. Pickard-Cambridge F. O. Arachnida - Araneida and Opiliones. In: Biologia Centrali-Americana, Zoology. 1900;2 [Google Scholar]
  115. Pickard-Cambridge O. Araneida . Scientific results of the second Yarkand mission; Calcutta: 1885. 115 [Google Scholar]
  116. Piel W. H. The systematics of Neotropical orb-weaving spiders in the genus Metepeira (Araneae: Araneidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College. 2001;157:1–92. [Google Scholar]
  117. Pinkus Rendón M. A., Ibarra-Núñez G, Parra-Tabla V, García-Ballinas J A, Hénaut J. Spider diversity in coffee plantations with different management in Southeast Mexico. Journal of Arachnology. 2006;34(1):104–112. doi: 10.1636/M03-044.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  118. Pinzon J., Benavides L., Sabogal A. New records of araneid spiders (Araneae: Araneidae) in the Colombian Amazon Region. Zootaxa. 2010;2626:46–60. [Google Scholar]
  119. Platnick N. I. The spider family Anyphaenidae in America north of Mexico. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology Harvard. 1974;146:205–266. [Google Scholar]
  120. Ponomarev A. V., Komarov Y. E. Preliminary compilation of material on the spider fauna (Aranei) of North Ossetia-Alania. Trudy Severo-Osetinskogo Gosudarstvennogo Prirodnogo Zapovednika. 2013;2:76–111. [Google Scholar]
  121. Qamar F. M., Ali H., Ashraf S., Daud A., Gillani H., Mirza H., Rehman H. U. Distribution and habitat mapping of key fauna species in selected areas of western Himalaya. Pakistan Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 2011;21:396–399. [Google Scholar]
  122. Ramirez M. G., Fandino L. B. Genetic variability and gene flow in Metepeira ventura (Araneae, Araneidae) Journal of Arachnology. 1996:1–8.
  123. Ramirez M. G., Haakonsen K. E. Gene flow among habitat patches on a fragmented landscape in the spider Argiope trifasciata (Araneae: Araneidae) Heredity. 1999;83(5):580–585. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6885630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Ramirez M. G., Eiman S. S., Wetkowski M. M., Mooers M. K., Alvarez M. H., Mitchell K. G., McGran A. S. Heterozygosity and fitness in a California population of the labyrinth spider Metepeira ventura (Araneae, Araneidae) Invertebrate biology. 2007;126(1):67–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2007.00077.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  125. Ramírez M. J. The spider subfamily Amaurobioidinae (Araneae, Anyphaenidae): a phylogenetic revision at the generic level. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 2003;277:1–262. doi: 10.1206/0003-0090(2003)277<0001:TSSAAA>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  126. Raven R. J. Mygalomorph spiders of the Barychelidae in Australia and the western Pacific. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum. 1994;35:291–706. [Google Scholar]
  127. Rego F. N. A. A., Venticinque E. M., Brescovit A. D., Rheims C. A., Albernaz A. L. K. M. A contribution to the knowledge of the spider fauna (Arachnida: Araneae) of the floodplain forests of the main Amazon River channel. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología. 2009;97:85–96. [Google Scholar]
  128. Řezáč M., Pekár S., Johannesen J. Taxonomic review and phylogenetic analysis of central European Eresus species (Araneae: Eresidae) Zoologica Scripta. 2008;37:263–28. [Google Scholar]
  129. Ricetti J., Bonaldo A. B. Diversidade e estimativas de riqueza de aranhas em quatro fitofisionomias na Serra do Cachimbo, Pará, Brasil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia. 2008;98(1):88–99. doi: 10.1590/S0073-47212008000100013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  130. Rix M. G., Harvey M. S. Australian assassins, Part I: A review of the assassin spiders (Araneae, Archaeidae) of mid-eastern Australia. ZooKeys. 2011;123:1–100. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.123.1448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Rix M G, Harvey M S. Australian Assassins, Part II: A review of the new assassin spider genus Zephyrarchaea (Araneae, Archaeidae) from southern Australia. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.191.3070. ZooKeys. 2012;191:1–62. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.191.3070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Roberts M. J. Collins Field Guide: Spiders of Britain & Northern Europe. HarperCollins; London: 1995. 383 [Google Scholar]
  133. Robinson M. H., Robinson B. Evolution beyond the orb web: the web of the araneid spider Pasilobus sp., its structure, operation and construction. Zoologycal Journal of the Linnean Society. 1975;56:301–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1975.tb00272.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  134. Rodrigues A. S.L., Pilgrim J. D., Lamoreux J. F., Hoffmann M., Brooks T. M. The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecology & Evolution. 2006;21:71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Rossi FW. Neue Arten von Arachniden des k. k. Museums, beschrieben und mit Bemerkungen ueber verwandte Formen begleitet. Naturwissenschaftliche Abhandlungen, Wien. 1846;1:11–19. [Google Scholar]
  136. Rozwalka R. Nowe stanowisko Clubiona frisia Wunderlich & Schuett, 1995 (Araneae: Clubionidae) w Polsce. Przegląd Zoologiczny. 2005;49:53–55. [Google Scholar]
  137. Saavedra E. D.C., Flórez E. D., Fernández C. H. Capacidad de depredación y comportamiento de Alpaida veniliae (Araneae: Araneidae) en el cultivo de arroz. Revista Colombiana de Entomología. 2007;33(1):74. [Google Scholar]
  138. Schenkel E. Schwedisch-chinesische wissenschaftliche Expedition nach den nordwestlichen Provinzen Chinas, unter Leitung von Dr Sven Hedin und Prof. Sü Ping-chang. Araneae gesammelt vom schwedischen Artz der Expedition. Arkiv för Zoologi. 1936;29(A1):1–314. [Google Scholar]
  139. Schenkel E. Bericht über einige Spinnentiere aus Venezuela. Verhandlungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Basel. 1953;64:1–57. [Google Scholar]
  140. Sewlal Jo-Anne N. Checklist of orb-weaving spiders of Trinidad and Tobago belonging to the families Araneidae, Nephilidae and Tetragnathidae. Living World, Journal of Trinidad and Tobago Field Naturalists’ Club. 2010:67–77.
  141. Shimojana M. Four new species of the genus Coelotes (Araneae: Agelenidae) from the Ryukyu Islands, Japan. Arachnological Papers Presented to Takeo Yaginuma on the Occasion of his Retirement 1989
  142. Siliwal Manju, Molur Sanjay, Biswas B. K. Indian spiders (Arachnida: Araneae): Updated checklist 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/jott.zpj.1283.1999-2049. Zoos' Print Journal. 2005;20(10):1999–2049. doi: 10.11609/jott.zpj.1283.1999-2049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  143. Simon E. Arachnides de l'Himalaya, recueillis par MM. Oldham et Wood-Mason, et faisant partie des collections de l'Indian Museum. Première partie. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. 1889;58:334–344. [Google Scholar]
  144. Simon M. Eugñe. On the Arachnida collected during the “Skeat Expedition” to the Malay Peninsula. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1901.tb08164.x. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. 1901;71(1):45–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1901.tb08164.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  145. Strand E. Diagnosen neuer Spinnen aus Madagaskar und Sansibar. Zoologischer Anzeiger. 1907;31:725–748. [Google Scholar]
  146. Syphard A. D., Radeloff V. C., Hawbaker T. J., Stewart S. I. Conservation threats due to human-caused increases in fire frequency in Mediterranean-climate ecosystems. Conservation Biology. 2009;23(3):758–769. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01223.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Szinetar C. Data on the biology of Larinia jeskovi Marusik, 1986 (Araneae: Araneidae) from the reed belts of lake Balaton. Ekologia (Bratislava) 2000;19:105–110. [Google Scholar]
  148. Tanikawa Japanese spiders of the genus Larinia Simon (Araneae: Araneidae) Acta Arachnologica. 1989;38(2):31–47. doi: 10.2476/asjaa.38.31. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  149. Thorell T. Aracnidi di Nias e di Sumatra raccolti nel 1886 dal Sig. E. Modigliani. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova; 1890. [Google Scholar]
  150. Thorell T. Studi sui ragni Malesi e Papuani IV. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova; Genova: 1890. [Google Scholar]
  151. Thorell T. Descriptive catalogue of the spiders of Burma. London.; 1895. [Google Scholar]
  152. Thorell T. Viaggio di Leonardo Fea in Birmania e regioni vicine. LXXIII. Secondo aggio sui ragni Birmani. I. Parallelodontes. Tubitelariae. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova. 1897;37:161–267. [Google Scholar]
  153. Tsvetkov A. S., Ponomarev A. V., Khanov T. V. Addition to the fauna of spiders (Aranei) of the Northern Caspian region. Caucasian Entomological Bulletin. 2006;2(2):165–166. [Google Scholar]
  154. Tuanmu Mao-Ning, Jetz Walter. A global 1-km consensus land-cover product for biodiversity and ecosystem modelling. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geb.12182. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2014;23(9):1031–1045. doi: 10.1111/geb.12182. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  155. Tucker R W E. Contributions to the South African Arachnid Fauna. II. On some new South African spiders of the families Barychelidae, Dipluridae, Eresidae, Zodariidae, Heracliidae, Urocteidae, Clubionidae. http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.22319. Annals of the South African Museum. 1917;17:439–488. doi: 10.5962/bhl.part.22319. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  156. Uetz G. W., Burgess W. Habitat structure and colonial behavior in Metepeira spinipes (Araneae: Araneidae), an orb weaving spider from Mexico. Psyche. 1979;86(1):79–90. doi: 10.1155/1979/76206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  157. Umann T. B. Habitat selection and dispersal power of the spider Eresus cinnaberinus (Olivier, 1789) in the porphyry landscape near Halle (Saale) Proceedings of the 16th European Colloquium of Arachnology. 1997;37:45. [Google Scholar]
  158. IUCN UNEP-WCMC and. Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) [On-line], [2017], Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. https://www.protectedplanet.net/ [2017-10-02T00:00:00+03:00];
  159. Naturales Unidad Administrativa Especial del Sistema de Parques Nacionales. Plan de Manejo Parque Nacional Natural Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta 2005-2009. Territorial Costa Atlantica, Santa Marta; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  160. Nations United. The Millenium Development Goals Report. United Nations; New York: 2015. [Google Scholar]
  161. Service USDA Forest. Mendocino National Forest - Forest Management Plan. Forest Management Plan for the Mendocino National Forest. http://www.fs.usda.gov/detailfull/mendocino/landmanagement/planning/?cid=fsbdev3_004518&width=full. [2017-09-26T00:00:00+03:00];
  162. Service USDA Forest. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; 2005. Land Management Plan: Part 2, Los Padres National Forest Strategy. [Google Scholar]
  163. Service USDA Forest. Business Plan for the Mendocino National Forest 2006
  164. Service USDA Forest. Mendocino National Forest Ecological Restoration Plan. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region 2013
  165. Van Keer K., Van Keer J., De Koninck H., Vanuytven H. "Loch Ness monster" found: First verified record of Eresus sp. for Belgium since 1896. Nieuwsbrief van de Belgische Arachnologische Vereniging. 2008;23:110–113. [Google Scholar]
  166. Van Keer K., Vanuytven H., De Koninck H., Van Keer J. More than one third of the Belgian spider fauna (Araneae) found within the city of Antwerp: faunistics and some reflections on urban ecology. Nieuwsbrief van de Belgische Arachnologische Vereniging. 2010;25(2):160–180. [Google Scholar]
  167. Vellard J. Le venin des araignées. Masson et Cie; Paris: 1936. 312 [Google Scholar]
  168. Watt M S, Kriticos D J, Manning L K. The current and future potential distribution of Melaleuca quinquenervia. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00704.x. Weed Research. 2009;49(4):381–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00704.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  169. Wetterer J. K., Wild A. L., Suarez A. V., Roura-Pascual N., Espadaler X. Worldwide spread of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Myrmecological News. 2009;12:187–194. [Google Scholar]
  170. Wood HM, Matzke NJ, Gillespie RG, Griswold CE. Treating fossils as terminal taxa in divergence time estimation reveals ancient vicariance patterns in the palpimanoid spiders. Systematic Biology. 2012;62(2):264–284. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Workman T., Workman M. E. Malaysian Spiders. Belfast. 1894:9–24.
  172. Catalog World Spider. Natural History Museum Bern; 2018. World Spider Catalog. 19.0. [Google Scholar]
  173. Wunderlich J., Schütt K. Beschreibung der bisher verkannten Sackspinnen-Art Clubiona frisia n. sp. aus Europa (Arachnida: Araneae: Clubionidae) Entomologische Zeitschrift. 1995;105:10–17. [Google Scholar]
  174. Yin C. M., Wang J. F., Xie L. P., Peng X. J. Spiders in China: One Hundred New and Newly Recorded Species of the Families Araneidae and Agelenidae. Normal University Press; Hunan: 1990. New and newly recorded species of the spiders of family Araneidae from China (Arachnida, Araneae) [Google Scholar]
  175. Yin C. M., Zhao J. Z. Some new species of fam. Araneidae from China (Arachnida: Araneae). Acta Arachnologica Sinica. 1994;3:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  176. Yin C. M, Wang J. F., Zhu M. S., Xie L. P., Peng X. J., Bao Y. H. Fauna Sinica: Arachnida: Araneae: Araneidae. Science Press, Beijing. 1997;13 [Google Scholar]
  177. Zamani A., Nikmagham Z., Allahdadi M., Ghassemzadeh F., Mirshamsi O. New data on the spider fauna of Iran (Arachnida: Araneae) Zoology in the Middle East. 2014;60:362–367. doi: 10.1080/09397140.2014.970383. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  178. Zarcos Laura Pérez, Piñero Francisco Sánchez. Diet of the ladybird spider Eresus kollari (Araneae: Eresidae) in an arid system of southeastern Spain. http://dx.doi.org/10.1636/p15-74.1. Journal of Arachnology. 2016;44(3):359–366. doi: 10.1636/p15-74.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

Distribution of Coelotes amamiensis Shimojana, 1989

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170192.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s001.kml (21.6KB, kml)
Supplementary material 2

Distribution of Hololena hopi (Chamberlin & Ivie, 1942)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170191.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s002.kml (7.6KB, kml)
Supplementary material 3

Distribution of Oramia occidentalis (Marples, 1959)

Cardoso, P.Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170202.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s003.kml (4.1KB, kml)
Supplementary material 4

Distribution of Amaurobius transversus Leech, 1972

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170203.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s004.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 5

Distribution of Callobius pauculus Leech, 1972

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170204.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s005.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 6

Distribution of Thaloe ennery Brescovit, 1993

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170205.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s006.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 7

Distribution of Timbuka meridiana (L. Koch, 1866)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170206.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s007.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 8

Distribution of Wulfila fragilis Chickering, 1937

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170207.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s008.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 9

Distribution of Wulfila inornatus (O. P.-Cambridge, 1898)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170208.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s009.kml (7.6KB, kml)
Supplementary material 10

Distribution of Alpaida alticeps (Keyserling, 1879)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170201.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s010.kml (37.7KB, kml)
Supplementary material 11

Distribution of Alpaida veniliae (Keyserling, 1865)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170209.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s011.kml (369.1KB, kml)
Supplementary material 12

Distribution of Araneus camilla (Simon, 1889)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170210.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s012.kml (7.4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 13

Distribution of Araneus praedatus (O. P.-Cambridge, 1885)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_174088.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s013.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 14

Distribution of Cyclosa bianchoria Yin et al, 1990

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170212.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s014.kml (89.3KB, kml)
Supplementary material 15

Distribution of Cyclosa nevada Levi, 1999

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170213.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s015.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 16

Distribution of Cyrtarachne hubeiensis Yin & Zhao, 1994

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170214.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s016.kml (3.9KB, kml)
Supplementary material 17

Distribution of Gea spinipes L. Koch, 1843

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170215.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s017.kml (230.3KB, kml)
Supplementary material 18

Distribution of Larinia jeskovi Marusik, 1987

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170216.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s018.kml (1,018.7KB, kml)
Supplementary material 19

Distribution of Mangora falconae Schenkel, 1953

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170217.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s019.kml (29.1KB, kml)
Supplementary material 20

Distribution of Metazygia enabla Levi, 1995

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170218.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s020.kml (46KB, kml)
Supplementary material 21

Distribution of Metazygia octama Levi, 1995

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170220.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s021.kml (14.8KB, kml)
Supplementary material 22

Distribution of Metepeira ventura Chamberlin and Ivie, 1942

Pedro Cardoso

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170221.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s022.kml (63.2KB, kml)
Supplementary material 23

Distribution of Neoscona goliath (Benoit, 1963)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170222.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s023.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 24

Distribution of Ocrepeida verecunda Levi, 1995

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170223.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s024.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 25

Distribution of Plebs cyphoxis (Simon, 1908)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170224.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s025.kml (47.1KB, kml)
Supplementary material 26

Distribution of Tatepeira itu Levi, 1995

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170225.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s026.kml (2.2MB, kml)
Supplementary material 27

Distribution of Wagneriana yacuma Levi, 1991

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170226.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s027.kml (11.5KB, kml)
Supplementary material 28

Distribution of Austrarchaea platnickorum Rix & Harvey, 2011

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170227.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s028.kml (11.2KB, kml)
Supplementary material 29

Distribution of Zephyrarchaea marae Rix & Harvey, 2012

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170228.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s029.kml (62KB, kml)
Supplementary material 30

Distribution of Aurecocrypta lugubris Raven, 1994

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170229.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s030.kml (32.8KB, kml)
Supplementary material 31

Mandjela fleckeri Raven & Churchill, 1994

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170230.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s031.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 32

Distribution of Nihoa kaindi Raven, 1994

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170231.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s032.kml (3.9KB, kml)
Supplementary material 33

Distribution of Clubiona bifissurata Kritscher, 1966

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170232.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s033.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 34

Distribution of Clubiona frisia Wunderlich & Schuett, 1995

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_171382.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s034.kml (206.5KB, kml)
Supplementary material 35

Distribution of Clubiona pyrifera Schenkel, 1936

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170234.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s035.kml (10.9KB, kml)
Supplementary material 36

Distribution of Apochinomma nitidum (Thorell, 1895)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170235.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s036.kml (156.1KB, kml)
Supplementary material 37

Distribution of Corinna venezuelica (Caporiacco, 1955)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170236.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s037.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 38

Distribution of Acantheis variatus Thorell, 1890

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170237.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s038.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 39

Distribution of Phoneutria keyserlingi (F. O. P.-Cambridge, 1897)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170238.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s039.kml (22KB, kml)
Supplementary material 40

Dsitribution of Vulsor sextus Strand, 1907

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170240.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s040.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 41

Distribution of Stasimopus nanus Tucker, 1917

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170241.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s041.kml (7.6KB, kml)
Supplementary material 42

Distribution of Ilisoa hawequas Griswold, 1987

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170242.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s042.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 43

Distribution of Argenna polita (Banks, 1898)

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170243.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s043.kml (4KB, kml)
Supplementary material 44

Distribution of Rhode baborensis Beladjal & Bosmans, 1996

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_171412.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s044.kml (11KB, kml)
Supplementary material 45

Distribution of Eresus kollari Rossi, 1846

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170748.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s045.kml (60.7KB, kml)
Supplementary material 46

Distribution of Tricalamus jiangxiensis Li, 1994

Cardoso, P.

Data type: Distribution

File: oo_170245.kml

bdj-06-e23555-s046.kml (7.4KB, kml)

Articles from Biodiversity Data Journal are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES