Skip to main content
International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research logoLink to International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research
. 2018 Apr-Jun;8(2):111–115. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_447_16

Effect of Short-term Consumption of Amul Probiotic Yogurt Containing Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium Lactis Bb12 on Salivary Streptococcus mutans Count in High Caries Risk Individuals

Harshal Prakash Bafna 1,, CG Ajithkrishnan 1, Thanveer Kalantharakath 2, Ricky Pal Singh 3, Pulkit Kalyan 1, Jagadishchandra Bheemasain Vathar 1, Hemal R Patel 1
PMCID: PMC5932918  PMID: 29744324

Abstract

Aim:

This study aims to study the effect of short-term consumption of probiotic yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 on salivary Streptococcus mutans count in high caries risk individuals.

Materials and Methods:

A double-blind randomized control trial was conducted, and 70 high caries risk individuals with a salivary S. mutans count of more than 106 CFU/ml of saliva were followed for 4 weeks. Participants ingested 100 g yogurt containing L. acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 or yogurt without the two probiotic bacteria once daily at the end of meals for initial 2 weeks. Salivary S. mutans were enumerated in the laboratory by selective culture media.

Results:

A statistically significant reduction (P < 0.05) of salivary S. mutans was recorded after probiotic yogurt consumption with minimal residual effect, which was in contrast to the controls.

Conclusion:

L. acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 present in the yogurt were effective in reducing the S. mutans levels in saliva.

Keywords: Bifidobacteria, caries prevention, lactobacilli, probiotics, Streptococcus mutans

Introduction

Worldwide dental caries has affected 60%–90% of school children and nearly 100% of adults.[1] It is the most common and chronic microbial disease of complex etiology predominantly causing tooth loss. Reduction in dental caries is one of the objectives to achieve the Global Goals 2020. However, it has shown increasing trend in the developing countries including India.[2]

Research in the field of caries prevention has been focusing on ways for reducing or totally eradicating cariogenic flora from the oral cavity. However, most of the studies have shown that it is difficult to completely eliminate Streptococcus mutans from oral cavity by mechanical and chemical control. In an era where increasing health-care costs, rising food literacy, and the Hippocratic concept of “let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food” has led to discovery of “functional foods” that have moved into the corporate mainstream,[3] probiotics with their wide range of applicability have been believed to confer various beneficial health effects. Theoretically, oral microbial ecological alteration with these bacteria and a long-term reduction of S. mutans by these bacteria could imply to a reduced risk of initial lesions and also would clarify whether this approach could be an alternative strategy for the reduction of pathogenic S. mutans count [4] and thus an alternative to caries control strategy.

Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 are widely available in Indian markets with their focus on general health, oral ingestion being the common route of administration. We hypothesized that a short-term consumption of probiotic yogurt containing L. acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 might reduce salivary S. mutans count in high caries risk individuals. Being an intermediate endpoint, the study was undertaken to compare the salivary S. mutans levels before and after the short-term consumption of above-mentioned probiotic bacteria.

Materials and Methods

Prestudy procedure

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics committee, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Piparia, Vadodara. The sample size was calculated to be 58 (29 control and 29 intervention) based on the previous study [4] but was increased to 70 (35 control and 35 intervention) to tackle any expected attrition during the study. The confidence interval was taken to be 95% and power was set at 80%.

Training, calibration, and personnel

The field procedure for identifying the initial carious lesions using Nyvads criteria [5] was carried out by a single trained calibrated (Kappa coefficient = 0.89) investigator (Principal investigator) using the American Dental Association type III criteria,[6] while the laboratory investigations were carried out by an adequately trained and experienced microbiologist.

Selection of study subjects

A total of 105 individuals with informed and written consent were invited on a convenience basis for the study, of which those having at least one active carious lesion were considered for microbiological tests.[7] Further after the microbiological test 70 individuals with a salivary S. mutans count of more than 106 CFU/ml of saliva (microbiological selection criteria) were considered to have high caries risk [8] and were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Individuals with Habitual consumption of xylitol products or those on systemic antibiotic medication or fluoride treatment or those consuming any other probiotic product within the past 6 weeks or during the study were excluded from the study.

Preparation of mitis salivarius bacitracin agar – a selective culture media

The mitis salivarius agar powder recommended for Streptococci and bacitracin were obtained from HiMedia Laboratories Limited, Mumbai. The process of making culture media was carried out as per the instructions provided by the manufacturer while addition of bacitracin was done as recommended by Gold et al., 1973.[9] One ml of sterile 1% potassium tellurite solution was also added to it for staining the colonies. The pH of the agar was maintained at 7.4 at 25°C.

Study procedure

A double-blind randomized control trial was conducted. Randomization of individuals was done by lottery method and commercially available 100 g of commercially available Amul Masti probiotic yogurt containing L. acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 in the quantity of 106 CFU/100 g of yogurt was given to the experimental group while 100 g of Amul Masti yogurt without probiotic bacteria was given to the control group, once daily at the end of meals (so as to prevent the destruction of bacteria from gastric acids [10]), for 2 weeks. Individuals were asked to refrain from xylitol products, antibiotic medication, fluoride containing products, or any other probiotic product during the 4-week study.

Saliva sample collection and culture process

Paraffin-stimulated saliva samples were collected at baseline, immediately at the end of the intervention period (2 weeks) and at the end of the 4th week between 9.00 a.m. and 11 a.m. to minimize the effects of diurnal variation. The participants were asked to refrain from eating and drinking at least 90 min before saliva collection and to avoid swallowing during collection. The collected samples were then transferred to the laboratory immediately and cultured on selective media after serial dilutions. After 48 h of the incubation period, S. mutans appeared on the culture plate as blue-gray small, rough, raised, and adherent colonies. Colonies so identified were counted using a standardized digital colony counter. The number of colonies observed was then multiplied by the dilution factor of 105 to obtain the colony forming units of bacteria per ml of saliva.

Statistical analysis

ANOVA with repeated measures was performed to compare the intragroup S. mutans count respectively at different follow-ups. The intergroup comparison was done at baseline, at the end of 2 weeks and at the end of the 4th week using unpaired t-test.

Results

Table 1 illustrates the intergroup comparison of mean number of S. mutans count in case and control group at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks using unpaired t-test. The count showed a nonsignificant difference at baseline and at the end of 4 weeks period but was significantly different at the end of 2 weeks' intervention period.

Table 1.

Intergroup comparison of mean Streptococcus mutans counts in case and control using unpaired t-test

graphic file with name IJABMR-8-111-g001.jpg

Table 2 shows the results for intragroup comparison using repeated measure ANOVA.

Table 2.

Repeated measure ANOVA for intragroup comparison

graphic file with name IJABMR-8-111-g002.jpg

Mauchly's test of sphericity for the case group showed that there were significant differences between the “variance of differences” of the S. mutans count at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks as a result the readings were subjected to Hyunh and Feldt's test to compare difference in S. mutans count during the 4-week period which was of highly significant value, F (1.664, 34.000) = 169.607, P = 0.000. Thus, a pairwise comparison was done further that showed a significant difference of S. mutans between the baseline and 1st follow-up and also 1st and 2nd follow-up with a P value of 0.000. The difference of count was not significant between baseline and 2nd follow-up.

Mauchly's Test of Sphericity for the control group showed that there were no significant differences between the “variance of differences” of the S. mutans count at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks in control group. As a result, the readings were subjected to Wilks Lambda test which suggested that there was no significant difference of the S. mutans count during the 4 weeks period. Thus, a pair-wise comparison was not done in control group.

Table 3 shows the effect of time and interaction between time and intervention on S. mutans count in all the study participants. The effect was observed using Hyunh and Feldt's correction and a significant difference was observed in the S. mutans count as the time passed, F (1.663, 113.117) = 164.780, P = 0.000 and also there was a significant effect of interaction between the time and intervention on S. mutans count, F (1.663, 113.117) = 168.899, P = 0.000.

Table 3.

Effect of time and combined effect of time and intervention on Streptococcus mutans count

graphic file with name IJABMR-8-111-g003.jpg

Discussion

Antibiotic resistance, with the emergence of multiple resistant strains, is an increasingly important global problem. Oral infections constitute to some of the most common and costly forms of infections in humans.[11] It is a well-established fact that caries is characterized by colonization of the tooth surface biofilm (dental plaque) by mutans streptococci–in humans, while S. mutans have been implicated as specific organism associated with initiation of caries.[12] The ability of these microbes to adhere firmly to the surfaces of salivary protein-coated teeth and plaque biofilm and increase in numbers by both growth and recruitment from the planktonic phase (salivary suspension) by auto-aggregation on exposure to dietary sucrose is an important event in caries formation and progression.[13] The concept of microbial ecological change with probiotic bacteria as a mechanism for preventing dental disease is therefore important for prevention of dental disease.[11]

Randomized controlled trial is the most rigorous way of determining whether a cause-effect relation exists between treatment and outcome and also rules out the selection bias and therefore it was used in the present study. Blinding at the level of participants and laboratory investigator helped to rule out the ascertainment bias. The present study aimed at evaluating the combined effect of probiotic bacteria L. acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 on salivary S. mutans count with yogurt as a vehicle in high caries risk individuals. The effect of probiotic bacteria was evaluated without exercising control on individuals routine oral hygiene procedures and dietary habits (except for control over intake of other probiotic products) so their effect in real-life situation could be observed.

In our study, a significant difference in S. mutans count was seen in the case group during the 2-week period suggesting that the probiotic bacteria L. acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 were effective in reducing the S. mutans count in saliva and for this the null hypothesis was rejected. These results were similar to that of Singh et al., Caglar et al., Cildir et al., Chinnappa et al., Srivastava et al. and Yousuf et al.[14,15,16,17,18,19]

The decline in the S. mutans count observed in the present study can be attributed to the fact that probiotics exert health benefits on the consumers. The various mechanisms of action of probiotics in the oral cavity are listed in Table 4.

Table 4.

Mechanism of action of probiotics

graphic file with name IJABMR-8-111-g004.jpg

The probiotic bacteria, Bifidobacterium, have been found to be quite acidogenic in the oral cavity while lactobacillus is the most acidogenic among other lactic acid producing bacteria. The duo are also heterofermentative in nature, i.e., they produce both lactic acid and acetic acid. Bifidobacteria also have the ability to bind to Fusobacterium nucleatum-covered hydroxyapatite and lactobacilli have been shown to temporarily colonize the oral cavity.[20] These properties of both Bifidobacterium and lactobacillus render them the ability to adhere to the oral mucosa and dental tissues as part of the biofilm and compete with the growth of dental pathogens to be effective against oral infections and could be responsible for the observed decline in S. mutans count in saliva in the current study.

A significant increase in the S. mutans count was observed at the end of fourth from that at the 2nd week, and this could be due to the minimal residual effect of the intervention after its discontinuation. The difference in S. mutans count in the control group during the 4-week period was found to be nonsignificant suggesting that the normal curd without probiotic bacteria was ineffective in reducing the S. mutans count in saliva. These results were in accordance with Mahantesha et al. and Sutula et al. observed a significant reduction of S. mutans level after the study period who also showed that there was no significant reduction in S. mutans count when compared to the baseline data or levels after the washout period.[21,22]

Probiotics incorporated into dairy products neutralize acidic conditions in the mouth and interfere with cariogenic bacteria.[23] Ferrazzano et al. suggested that the vehicle for administration of probiotics should be of milk origin due to contained casein phosphopeptides that have an inhibitory effect on demineralization and promote the remineralization of dental enamel.[24] Fermented dairy products are considered to be excellent vehicle for delivering probiotics because of a synergistic relationship between components in dairy products and probiotic cultures.[25] Hence, Yogurt was used as a vehicle in the present study.

The present study group comprised of young adults with the age of 18 years and above to rule out the inclusion of legally incompetent subjects (such as a [minor] child) in research on the effect of probiotics on oral health. The individuals selected for the microbiological test during sample selection were only those having initial active carious lesions, as acidogenic potential of the probiotic bacteria could have played a role in deep dentine caries progression.

In the current study, the sample size was determined by fixing the power of the study at 80% hence the study could not have failed to show the difference in outcomes in case it existed and therefore these results could be interpreted as positive results.

Conclusion

It was concluded from the present study that the consumption of probiotic bacteria L. acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 was effective in the reduction of salivary S. mutans but showed a minimal residual effect, and the approach could thus act as an alternative strategy for the reduction of pathogenic S. mutans count in oral cavity.

Limitations

The short intervention time in the present study was a limitation.

Recommendations

  1. Individual effects of Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 and L. acidophilus La5 on S. mutans and tooth structure need to be evaluated

  2. The compatibility of mode of delivery, i.e., vehicle also needs to be assessed for the two bacteria separately as the two bacteria individually might interact differently with the vehicle

  3. The encouraging findings from the present study also call for an intervention study in caries-prone children.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.WHO. Oral Health Factsheet No. 318 dated April, 2012. [Last accessed on 2016 Nov 21]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs318/en/#, FDI.
  • 2.Bagramian RA, Garcia-Godoy F, Volpe AR. The global increase in dental caries. A pending public health crisis. Am J Dent. 2009;22:3–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chodho K, Singh AK, Patel VB. Horticulture to Horti-Business. New Delhi: Westville Publishing House; 2011. p. 433. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Caglar E, Kuscu OO, Selvi Kuvvetli S, Kavaloglu Cildir S, Sandalli N, Twetman S, et al. Short-term effect of ice-cream containing bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12 on the number of salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli. Acta Odontol Scand. 2008;66:154–8. doi: 10.1080/00016350802089467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ferjeskov O, Kidd E. Dental Caries: The Disease and its Clinical Management. 2nd ed. UK: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2008. p. 57. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hiremath SS. Textbook of Public Health Dentistry. 3rd ed. India: Elsevier; 2016. p. 156. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kulkarni VV, Damle SG. Comparative evaluation of efficacy of sodium fluoride, chlorhexidine and triclosan mouth rinses in reducing the mutans streptococci count in saliva: An in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2003;21:98–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Klock B, Krasse B. A comparison between different methods for prediction of caries activity. Scand J Dent Res. 1979;87:129–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1979.tb00664.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gold OG, Jordan HV, Van Houte J. A selective medium for Streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol. 1973;18:1357–64. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(73)90109-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sahelian R. Probiotics Benefits and Side Effects, Research Studies Regarding their Medical Uses. [Last accessed on 2013 Jul 04]. Available from: http://www.raysahelian.com/probiotics.html .
  • 11.Caglar E, Kargul B, Tanboga I. Bacteriotherapy and probiotics' role on oral health. Oral Dis. 2005;11:131–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01109.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ashwin D, Ke V, Taranath M, Ramagoni NK, Nara A, Sarpangala M, et al. Effect of probiotic containing ice-cream on salivary mutans streptococci (SMS) levels in children of 6-12 years of age: A Randomized controlled double blind study with six-months follow up. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:ZC06–9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/10942.5532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tanzer JM, Thompson A, Lang C, Cooper B, Hareng L, Gamer A, et al. Caries inhibition by and safety of Lactobacillus paracasei DSMZ16671. J Dent Res. 2010;89:921–6. doi: 10.1177/0022034510369460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Singh RP, Damle SG, Chawla A. Salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli modulations in young children on consumption of probiotic ice-cream containing Bifidobacterium lactis bb12 and Lactobacillus acidophilus La5. Acta Odontol Scand. 2011;69:389–94. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.572289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Caglar E, Kuscu OO, Cildir SK, Kuvvetli SS, Sandalli N. A probiotic lozenge administered medical device and its effect on salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18:35–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00866.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cildir SK, Germec D, Sandalli N, Ozdemir FI, Arun T, Twetman S, et al. Reduction of salivary mutans streptococci in orthodontic patients during daily consumption of yoghurt containing probiotic bacteria. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:407–11. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chinnappa A, Konde H, Konde S, Raj S, Beena JP. Probiotics for future caries control: A short-term clinical study. Indian J Dent Res. 2013;24:547–9. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.123363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Srivastava S, Saha S, Kumari M, Mohd S. Effect of probiotic curd on salivary pH and Streptococcus mutans: A Double blind parallel randomized controlled trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:ZC13–6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/15530.7178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yousuf A, Nagaraj A, Ganta S, Sidiq M, Pareek S, Vishnani P, et al. Comparative evaluation of commercially available freeze dried powdered probiotics on mutans streptococci count: A Randomized, double blind, clinical study. J Dent (Tehran) 2015;12:729–38. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haukioja A, Yli-Knuuttila H, Loimaranta V, Kari K, Ouwehand AC, Meurman JH, et al. Oral adhesion and survival of probiotic and other lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in vitro. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2006;21:326–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2006.00299.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mahantesha T, Reddy KM, Kumar NH, Nara A, Ashwin D, Buddiga V, et al. Comparative study of probiotic ice cream and probiotic drink on salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in 6-12 years age group children. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7:47–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sutula J, Coulthwaite LA, Thomas LV, Verran J. The effect of a commercial probiotic drink containing Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota on oral health in healthy dentate people. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2013;24:1–12. doi: 10.3402/mehd.v24i0.21003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dhawan R, Dhawan S. Role of probiotics on oral health: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Interdiscip Dent. 2013;3:71–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ferrazzano GF, Cantile T, Quarto M, Ingenito A, Chianese L, Addeo F, et al. Protective effect of yogurt extract on dental enamel demineralization in vitro. Aust Dent J. 2008;53:314–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00072.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kopp-Hoolihan L. Prophylactic and therapeutic uses of probiotics: A review. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:229–38. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00060-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES