Abstract
In this study, we examined the inhibitory effect of L. plantarum Q180 on adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 and reduction of adipocyte size in mice fed high-fat diet. L. plantarum Q180 inhibited the adipocyte differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells (18.47 ± 0.32%) at a concentration of 400 µg/mL (108 CFU/g). As a result of western blot analysis, the expression of C/EBPα and PPARγ in 3T3-L1 adipocyte treated with 400 µg/mL of L. plantarum Q180 decreased 35.16% and 40.07%, respectively, compared with the control. To examine the effects, mice were fed three different diets as follows: ND (n=6) was fed ND and orally administered saline solution; HFD (n=6), HFD and orally administered saline solution; and HFD+Q180 (n=6), HFD and orally administered L. plantarum Q180. After six weeks, the rate of increase of body weight was 13.7% lower in the HFD+Q180 group compared to the HFD group. In addition, the epididymal fat weights of the HFD+Q180 group were lower than that of the HFD group. The change of adipocyte size was measured in diet-induced obese mice. Consequently, the number of large-size adipose tissue was less distributed in the ND and HFD+Q180 groups than in the HFD group. L. plantarum Q180 has an effect on the inhibition of 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation, fat absorption and reduction of adipocyte size. L. plantarum Q180 could be applied to functional food products that help improve obesity.
Keywords: adipocyte differentiation, adipocyte size, body weight, Lactobacillus plantarum
Introduction
Obesity is becoming a more and more important public health problem as well as a worldwide pandemic. The main role of adipocytes is the site of energy storage to form of triacylglycerol during times when input exceeds consumption and to break down the stored lipid into free fatty acids when energy is needed. Obesity occurs when energy input persistently exceeds energy consumption, causing both hypertrophy and hyperplasia of adipocytes (Otto and Lane, 2005). Obesity is caused by an excessive accumulation of body fat, and it can adversely affect health. In fact, obesity is one of the main factors that cause many serious diseases such as insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), certain cancers, and type-2 diabetes (Haslam and James, 2005; Hirose et al., 2013).
Many research scientists have endeavored to define the transcriptional events regulating preadipocyte differentiation (adipogenesis) and adipocyte function for many years. The differentiation of preadipocytes into adipocytes is controlled by a sophisticated network of transcription factors that regulate the expression of many proteins that establish the mature giant cell phenotype (Farmer, 2006). The CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) family (C/EBPα, β, and δ) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) are the main transcription factors for adipocyte differentiation by being involved in the sequential expression of adipocyte-specific proteins (Gregoire et al., 1998; Rosen et al., 1999). PPARγ is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of transcription factors and is mainly expressed in adipose tissue (Tontonoz et al., 1994). C/EBPs are numbers of a diverse group of nuclear factors that contain leucine zipper domain; in particular, C/EBPα has a direct role to play in establishing the quiescent, terminally differentiated state of adipocyte (Cao et al., 1991; Samuelsson et al., 1991).
Although the relationship between obesity and probiotics has not been extensively studied, the beneficial effects of some probiotics or probiotic-containing food products on body weight control and metabolic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia have been reported (Bhathena et al., 2009; Lee et al., 2007).
In this study, we sought to investigate the inhibitory effect of L. plantarum Q180 on adipocyte differentiation 3T3-L1, fat absorption, and reduction of adipocyte size in mice fed high-fat diet.
Materials and Methods
Lactic acid bacteria
L. plantarum Q180 isolated from the feces of healthy adults: This strain was selected by screening for probiotic properties such as acid and bile tolerance, antibacterial activity, and antibiotic tolerance (Park et al., 2014). The culture was maintained in MRS broth (Difco, USA).
3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation
3T3-L1 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA). According to the method of Hemati et al. (1997), 3T3-L1 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; GIBCO) with high glucose content supplemented with 10% bovine calf serum (BCS; GIBCO) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma, USA) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Before differentiation, MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide) assay was performed as described by the modified method of Mosmann (1983) for the determination of strain concentration that does not have any cell toxicity. 3T3-L1 cells were seeded in a 96-well plate at a 1 × 105 cells. After 24 h, the DMEM medium was exchanged with the same medium containing sample (10, 100, 200, 400, 800, and 1000 µg/mL). After 24 h, the 20 µL of 5 mg/mL MTT solution was added in each well, and the cell were incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The medium was removed and the cells lysed with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The amount of MTT formazan product formed was determined by measuring the absorbance at 550 nm. To induce differentiation, 2-day post-confluent cells (day 0) were stimulated for 2 days with an adipocyte differentiation cocktail medium containing 5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX; Sigma, USA), 1 mM dexamethasone (Dex; Sigma, USA), and 5 μg/mL of insulin (Sigma, USA) in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; GIBCO) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. On day 2, the medium was replaced with DMEM containing 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 5 μg/mL of insulin, and incubated for 2 days, followed by culturing with DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin for an additional 4 days (day 8) at the end of which more than 90% of the cells were changed into mature adipocytes with accumulated fat droplets. To examine the effect of L. plantarum Q180 on the differentiation of preadipocytes into adipocytes, the cells were treated with various concentrations of sample on day 0 and day 2. For sample preparation, the culturing L. plantarum Q180 in MRS broth were harvested in a refrigerated centrifuge (1,500 g for 15 min at 4℃) and washed three times with distilled water to remove the MRS broth. The washed L. plantarum Q180 was freeze-dried and resuspended in distilled water at a concentration of 10 mg/mL, homogenized using a sonicator for 50 s, followed by a 1 min interval (repeated three times). The 3T3-L1 cells were treated with different concentration of supernatant, i.e., 0, 10, 100, 200, 400 μg/mL. Quantified lipid accumulation was measured using oil red O (Sigma) described method by Ramirez-Zacarias et al. (1992).
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis of the cultured 3T3-L1 cells was performed based on the modified method previously described by Rhyu et al. (2014). Mature 3T3-L1 adipocytes treated with L. plantarum Q180 were harvested, and cell pellets were washed and resuspended in PBS. After centrifugation, cells were resuspended in RIPA buffer (50mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% (v/v) Nonidet-P40, 0.5% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% (w/v) SDS, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 μg/mL leupeptin, 50 mM NaF, and 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, pH 8.0) containing protease inhibitor, and cell lysis was performed at 4℃ for 30 min with vigorous shaking. Cell lysates were then centrifuged at 22,000 g for 25 min at 4℃, and supernatants were stored at -70℃ until the western blot analysis. Protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method (Bradford, 1976). Protein samples (40 μg protein per well) were electrophoresed on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Cellular proteins were then transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane blocked with 5% non-fat dried milk in TBS-T buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.06% Tween-20, pH 8.0) for 30 min at room temperature. Next, the blots were incubated overnight with primary antibodies [C/EBPα, PPARγ, and β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA)] at 4℃. After three washes with TBS-T buffer, the blots were incubated with the secondary antibody for 2 h at room temperature. Horseradish peroxidase was used as secondary antibody. And then, the bolts were washed three times with TBS-T buffer, and incubated with ECL substrate solution (Amersham Biosciences, UK) according to the instruction manual. Stained protein bands were visualized using a ChemiDoc XRS System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA), and protein expression was quantified using image J software (National Institute of Health, USA).
Animals and treatment
Male C57BL/6J mice (male, 6 weeks old, n=18) were purchased from DooYeol Biotech (Korea). All of the mice were housed individually in standard mouse cages measuring 33 × 20 × 19 cm (W × D × H) and containing 1 cm of sawdust under constant temperature and humidity (20 ± 2°C, 55 ± 10%), with a 12 h light/dark cycle. After acclimatization for 1 week on a normal chow diet, they were divided into three groups of six mice based on their body weights (23.2 ± 0.7 kg). The mice were fed either a high-fat diet (HFD; n=12) or a normal diet (ND; n= 6) for 6 weeks. In calorific terms, the high-fat diet contained of 34.3% fat, 27.3% carbohydrate, and 34.3% protein (5.1 kcal/g), whereas the normal diet consisted 4.2% fat, 64.7% carbohydrate, and 18.6% protein (3.7 kcal/g). The compositions of HFD and ND are given in Table 1. The groups of mice were fed as follows: the ND group was fed a normal diet and an orally administered saline solution; the HFD group, a high fat diet and an orally administered saline solution; and the HFD+Q180 group, a high fat diet and an orally administered L. plantarum Q180 (109 CFU/day) in saline solution. Food and water were freely available, and L. plantarum Q180 in saline solution or only saline solution was orally administered once a day for six weeks (2.5 µg/g body weight). L. plantarum Q180 was suspended in sterilized saline immediately prior to oral administration to the mice. Body weight was measured once a week. After 6 weeks, the mice were anesthetized with diethyl ether after 12 h of fasting. The epididymal fat pads, liver, spleen, and kidneys of the mice were quickly isolated after they were sacrificed and weighed. All animal experimentations were performed after obtaining approval from Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Korea Food Research Institute (KFRI-M-181).
Table 1. Formula of the normal diet and high fat diet.
Formula | g/kg | |
---|---|---|
Normal diet | High fat diet | |
Casein | 210.0 | 265.0 |
L-Cystine | 3.0 | 4.0 |
Maltodextrin | 50.0 | 160.0 |
Sucrose | 325.0 | 90.0 |
Lard | 20.0 | 310.0 |
Soybean Oil | 20.0 | 30.0 |
Cellulose | 37.15 | 65.5 |
Mineral Mix, AIN-93G-MX(94046) | 35.0 | 48.0 |
Calcium Phosphate, dibasic | 2.0 | 3.4 |
Vitamin Mix, AIN-93-VX(94047) | 15.0 | 21.0 |
Choline Bitartrate | 2.75 | 3.0 |
Food Color | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Analysis blood serum levels
At the end of the 6-wk experimental period, blood samples were collected from all the rats (taken from the eyes) and immediately placed in sterile tubes. Serum was collected by centrifugation at 2,000 g for 15 min at 4℃. The serum samples were analyzed for total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) activity concentration by Green Cross (Korea).
Measurement of adipocyte size
After the animals were sacrificed, the both side epididymal fat pads were quickly collected. Epididymal fat pads were fixed with 10% formaldehyde. According to the method of Hirsch and Gallian (1968), samples were filtered using a 250-µm nylon filter and washed completely with PBS. And, then the filtrate was filtered using a 25-µm nylon filter to trap fixed adipocytes, and the cells were washed completely with PBS. Cell suspensions were applied to glass slides and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin solutions (H&E staining) according to previously described method by van Goor et al. (1986). The cells on the glass slides were observed with a microscope, and the adipocyte size was measured using Image J Software (National Institute of Health, USA).
Statistical analysis
The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed with a statistical analysis system (SAS version 9.0, SAS Institute, Inc., NC, USA). The significance of the differences was analyzed by conducting a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Duncan’s multiple range tests. Significance was considered at p<0.05.
Results and Discussion
Inhibitory effect on adipocyte differentiation of L. plantarum Q180
According to the result of the MTT assay, L. plantarum Q180 did not have any cell toxicity in the 3T3-L1 cell line up to a concentration of 400 µg/mL (Fig. 1). Fig. 2 shows that an 8-day treatment at various concentrations (0, 10, 100, 200, 400 µg/mL) of L. plantarum Q180 during the differentiation period inhibited adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 significantly and in a dose-dependent manner in terms of lipid accumulation compared with the control cells. Among the tested concentrations of L. plantarum Q180, 400 µg/mL was the most effective concentration in reducing the lipid accumulation in differentiated cells (by 18.47 ± 0.32% compared with the control cells). We carried out western blotting analysis to determine whether L. plantarum Q180 inhibited adipocyte differentiation by negatively controlling the expression of C/EBPα and PPARγ, the key transcriptional regulators. L. plantarum Q180 significantly inhibited the protein expression of C/EBPα and PPARγ (p<0.05). As shown in Fig. 3, the expression levels of C/EBPα and PPARγ in 3T3-L1 adipocyte treated with 400 µg/mL of L. plantarum Q180 were significantly reduced by 35.16% and 40.07%, respectively, relative to the levels in the control. The intense of obesity is closely related to the degree of differentiation of preadipocytes to adipocytes and the enlargement of adipocytes in adipose tissues (Wang and Jones, 2004). During adipocyte differentiation, among many kinds of transcriptional activators, C/EBPα and PPARγ play a main role in coordinating the adipocyte gene expression (Guo and Liao, 2000). According to Park et al. (2011), KY1032-CE was obtained by lysing L. plantarum KY1032 isolated from kimchi suspended in PBS 1010 CFU/mL and subsequently used to treat 3T3-L1 preadipocytes during the adipogenic phase. After treatment with KY1032-CE at 0.01% and 0.1%, lipid accumulation decreased by 11 ± 3.6% (p<0.01) and 30.6 ± 9.2% (p<0.001), respectively. Furthermore, KY1032-CE treatment led to a decrease in C/EBPα and PPARγ expression by 23 ± 8.2% and 28.3 ± 5.1% (p<0.001), respectively. The inhibitory effect on the 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation of KY1032-CE was higher than that of L. plantarum Q180. Note, however, that the concentration of KY1032-CE treatment during cell differentiation was higher than that of L. plantarum Q180. Moreover, the expression levels of C/EBPα and PPARγ were lower in 3T3-L1 adipocyte treated with L. plantarum Q180 than in the cell treated with KY1032-CE. Moon et al. (2012) reported that W. koreensis OK1-6, the strain isolated from kimchi and cultured in MRS broth with 1% arginine added, reduced lipid accumulation by 32% and 28% of the control in 3T3-L1 adipocyte. Moreover, the strain significantly reduced the mRNA expression levels of C/EBPα compared with the untreated cell but did not reduce the PPARγ levels.
Body weight, organ weight, and fat weight
Fig. 4 and Table 2 shows the changes in body weight of the groups during the experiment. After six weeks, the body weight of the HFD group was observed to increase 25.94% on average, whereas that of the HFD+Q180 group increased by 21.87% on average. The rate of increase in body weight was 13.7% lower in the HFD+Q180 group compared with the HFD group, although the HFD+Q180 mice still gained more weight than the mice fed with the ND. However, no significant differences in body weight gains were observed among the groups. This increase in body weight appears to be associated with an increase in the weight of the epididymal fat pads of the mice (Table 3). The ND group showed the lowest epididymal fat weights (0.31 ± 0.05), whereas the HFD group showed the highest epididymal fat weights (0.81 ± 0.41). The HFD+Q180 group showed a decrease in epididymal fat weight (0.65 ± 0.23) than the HFD group. However, there were no significant differences between the groups, except the ND group, and no there were no significant differences between the groups regarding the weights of the liver, kidneys and spleen. C57BL/6J mice were fed on three different diets for six weeks. After six weeks, the rate of increase of body weight was 13.7% lower in the HFD+Q180 group compared with the HFD group (Fig. 4). In addition, the size of adipocyte cells taken from epididymal adipose tissues in mouse fed L. plantarum Q180 was found to decrease (Fig. 5). According to the report of An et al. (2011), Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were fed on three different diets (i.e., an SD group fed a standard diet and PBS; an HFD group fed an HFD and PBS; and an HFD+LAB group fed an HFD and LAB [B. pseudocatenulatum SPM 1204, B. longum SPM 1205 and B. longum SPM 1207; 1:1:1 ratio]). After seven weeks, the body weight of the HFD group was observed to increase by 9.53% compared to the SD group, while that of the HFD+LAB group increased by 7.01% compared with the SD group. The body weight was decreased by 2.70% of the HFD+LAB group than on the HFD group. The tendency towards an increase in body weight in that study is similar to the findings of our study.
Table 2. Body weight gain and food efficiency ratio in mice fed high fat diet with lactic acid bacteria for 6 weeks.
ND1) | HFD | HFD + Q180 | |
---|---|---|---|
Body weight gain (g) | 3.33 ± 0.51NS3) | 6.12 ± 3.14 | 5.07 ± 1.26 |
Food efficiency ratio2) | 0.027 ± 0.003NS | 0.040 ± 0.006 | 0.036 ± 0.011 |
All values are the mean ± SD (n=6).
1)ND, normal diet; HFD, high fat diet with saline solution; HFD+Q180, high fat diet with L. plantarum Q180 (109 CFU/day).
2)Food efficiency ratio = total body weight gain/total food intake.
3)NSValues in a row are not significantly different at p<0.05.
Table 3. Weights of the liver, kidneys, spleen, and epididymal fat padsa.
ND1) | HFD | HFD + Q180 | |
---|---|---|---|
Liver (g) | 0.90 ± 0.05NS2) | 0.89 ± 0.08 | 0.98 ± 0.09 |
Kidneys (g) | 0.29 ± 0.02a3) | 0.33 ± 0.02b | 0.34 ± 0.01b |
Spleen (g) | 0.06 ± 0.01a | 0.07 ± 0.01ab | 0.08 ± 0.01b |
Epididymal fat pads (g) | 0.31 ± 0.05b | 0.81 ± 0.41a | 0.65 ± 0.23ab |
Relative liver weight (g/100g body weight) | 3.43 ± 0.10a | 3.08 ± 0.26b | 3.47 ± 0.28a |
Relative kidney weight (g/100g body weight) | 1.10 ± 0.04b | 1.13 ± 0.09b | 1.19 ± 0.06a |
Relative spleen weight (g/100g body weight) | 0.22 ± 0.02NS | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.03 |
Relative epididymal fat pads weight (g/100g body weight) | 1.20 ± 0.18b | 2.75 ± 0.33a | 2.30 ± 0.70a |
All values are the mean ± SD (n=6).
1)ND, normal diet; HFD, high fat diet with saline solution; HFD+Q180, high fat diet with L. plantarum Q180 (109 CFU/day).
2) NSValues in a row are not significantly different at p<0.05.
3) a,bMeans in a row with difference letters are significantly differences (p<0.05).
Analysis blood serum levels
The blood serum levels are shown in Table 4. No significant differences were observed in the levels of TC, ALT and AST between the HFD group and HFD+Q180 group. TG concentration of the HFD group showed a significantly increase, however, serum TG concentration of the HFD+Q180 group was significantly decreased than that of the HFD group (p<0.05). The effect of lowering TG concentration of the HFD+Q180 group without affecting the structure and relative weight of the liver compared with ND group may not be due to a redistribution of lipids from the plasma to the liver, but rather to decreased intestinal absorption of lipids or increased lipid catabolism (Taranto et al., 1998). ALT and AST levels are commonly used for the indicator for diagnosis of the liver damage. ALT activities in HFD group was found to be significantly increased than ND group (p<0.05). ALT level of HFD group was increased by 2.61 folds compared with ND group. The ALT level of the HFD+Q180 group was decreased than that of the HFD group, but the difference was not significant.
Table 4. Blood serum levels in mice fed high fat diet with lactic acid bacteria for 6 weeks.
ND1) | HFD | HFD + Q180 | |
---|---|---|---|
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 137.00 ± 13.10b2) | 173.00 ± 8.88a | 181.83 ± 18.53a |
Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 81.00 ± 12.77b | 110.00 ± 21.34a | 88.67 ± 5.35b |
AST (U/L) | 144.80 ± 70.07NS | 139.33 ± 50.35 | 150.33 ± 48.51 |
ALT (U/L) | 56.40 ± 25.97b | 147.40 ± 13.24a | 126.00 ± 32.70a |
All values are the mean ± SD (n=6).
1)ND, normal diet; HFD, high fat diet with saline solution; HFD+Q180, high fat diet with L. plantarum Q180 (109 CFU/day).
2)a,bMeans within a row with difference letters are significantly differences (p<0.05).
3)NSValues in a row are not significantly different at p<0.05.
Reduction of adipocyte size
The comparison of adipocyte size of epididymal fat pads between mice groups in shown in Fig. 4. The epididymal fat pads of the mice were quickly isolated and the adipocyte size was observed and measured. In the ND group, which was the control group, the ratio of 2000 µm2 of adipocyte was higher than in the other size of adipocyte. In the HFD+Q180 group, fed HFD and orally administered L. plantarum Q180 (109 CFU day-1), the ratio of 2000 µm2 of adipocyte was also higher than in the other size of adipocyte. Note, however, that the ratio of over 5000 µm2 of adipocyte was highest in the HFD group, or the control group fed HFD. In addition, the average adipocyte size of the HFD group was found to be higher than that of the other groups. In the photograph of the epididymal fat pads in the mouse, it could also be seen that the adipocyte size of the HFD+Q180 group was smaller than that of the HFD group. The effects of certain lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium on reducing the adipocyte size in the HFD-fed mouse model have been reported in some papers. According to the report of Li et al. (2016), adipocyte sizes in mice administered four kinds of probiotic bacteria (L. casei, L. acidophilus, B. bifidus BGN4, and B. longum BORI) as supplement were significantly smaller than those in the HFD group. Takemura et al. (2010) also reported that the average adipocyte size was significantly lower in the L. plantarum strain No.14 administered mice than in the vehicle-administered mice. That is because the strains have the effect that reduced fat storage by the inhibition of dietary fat absorption (Hamad et al., 2009). Thus, the results suggest that L. plantarum Q180 may have a beneficial effect on obesity by inhibiting of differentiation of 3T3-L1 adipocyte and reducing the size of the adipocyte cells.
Conclusion
This study aimed to investigate the anti-obesity effects of L. plantarum Q180 through the inhibition of 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation, fat absorption and reduction of adipocyte size in diet-induced obese mice for application to functional food products that help improve obesity. L. plantarum Q180 inhibited the adipocyte differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells (18.47 ± 0.32%) at a concentration of 400 µg mL-1 (108 CFU/g). Also, the expression levels of C/EBPα and PPARγ in 3T3-L1 adipocyte treated with 400 µg/mL of L. plantarum Q180 decreased 35.16% and 40.07%, respectively, compared with the control. In the animal test, after six weeks, the rate of increase of body weight was 13.7% lower in the group feed HFD and orally administered L. plantarum Q180 compared to the HFD group. In addition, the epididymal fat weights of the HFD+Q180 group were lower than that of the HFD group. The change of adipocyte size was measured in diet-induced obese mice. Consequently, the number of large-size adipose tissue was less distributed in the ND and HFD+Q180 groups than in the HFD group. In conclusion, the L. plantarum Q180 strain is shown to have the inhibition of 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation via down-regulation of C/EBPα and PPARγ, fat absorption and reduction of adipocyte size in diet-induced obese mice and it has the potential to be applied to functional food products that help improve obesity as probiotics.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the High Value-added Food Technology Development Program(No. 111151-3) and Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry (IPET) through Agricultural Microbiome R&D Program(No. 916002-02-1-CG000), funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA).
References
- An HM, Park SY, Lee DK, Kim JR, Cha MK, Lee SW, Lim HT, Kim KJ, Ha NJ. Antiobesity and lipid-lowering effects of Bifidobacterium spp. in high fat diet-induced obese rats. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:116–124. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-10-116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhathena J, Martoni C, Kunlamarva A, Urbanska AM, Malhotra M, Prakash S. Orally delivered micro encapsulated live probiotic formulation lowers serum lipids in hypercholesterolemic hamsters. J Med Food. 2009;12:310–319. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2008.0166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao Z, Umek RM, Mcknight SL. Regulated expression of three C/EBP isoforms during adipose conversion of 3T3-L1 cells. Genes Dev. 1991;5:1538–1552. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.9.1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farmer SR. Transcriptional control of adipocyte formation. Cell Metab. 2006;4:263–273. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Funatsu T, Kakuta H, Takasu T, Noguchi M, Suzuki M, Miyata K. Experimental model of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia in sucrose-fed rats and the effectiveness of atorvastatin in the model. Metabolism. 2003;52:609–615. doi: 10.1053/meta.2003.50097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goor H, Gerrits PO, Grond J. The application of lipid-soluble stains in plastic embedded sections. Histochemistry. 1986;85:251–253. doi: 10.1007/BF00494811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gregoire FM, Smas CM, Sul HS. Understanding adipocyte differentiation. Physiol Rev. 1998;78:783–809. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1998.78.3.783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo X, Liao K. Analysis of gene expression profile during 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation. Gene. 2000;251:45–53. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00192-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamad EM, Sato M, Uze K, Yoshida T, Higashi S, Kawakami H, Kadooka Y, Matsuyama H, Abd El-Gawad IA, Imaizumi K. Milk fermented by Lactobacillus gasseri SBT 2055 influences adipocyte size via inhibition of dietary fat absorption in Zucker rats. Br J Nutr. 2009;101:716–724. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508043808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haslam DW, James WP. Obesity. Lancet. 2005;366:1197–1209. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67483-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hemati N, Ross SE, Erickson RL, Groblewski GE, MacDougald OA. Signaling pathways through which insulin regulates CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-α (C/EBP-α) phosphorylation and gene expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes: correlation with CLUT4 gene expression. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:25913–25919. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.41.25913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirose M, Ando T, Shofiqur R, Umeda K, Kodama Y, Nguyen SV, Goto T, Shimada M, Nagaoka S. Anti-obesity activity of hen egg anti-lipase immunoglobulin yolk, a novel pancreatic lipase inhibitor. Nutr Metab. 2013;10:70–75. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-10-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirsch J, Gallian E. Methods for the determination of adipose cell size in man and animals. J Lipid Res. 1968;9:110–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim SJ, Cho SY, Kim SH, Song OJ, Shin IS, Cha DS, Park HJ. Effect of microencapsulation on viability and other characteristics in Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2008;41:493–500. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2007.03.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lee K, Paek K, Lee HY, Park JH, Lee Y. Antiobesity effect of trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid-producing Lactobacillus plantarum PL62 on diet-induced obese mice. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;103:1140–1146. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03336.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Z, Jin H, Oh SY, Ji GE. Anti-obese effects of two Lactobacilli and two Bifidobacteria on ICR mice fed on a high fat diet. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;480:222–227. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moon YS, Soh JR, Yu JJ, Sohn HS, Cha YS, Oh SH. Intracellular lipid accumulation inhibitory effect of Weissella koreensis OK1-6 isolated from kimchi on differentiating adipocyte. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113:652–658. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;62:55–63. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Otto TC, Lane MD. Adipose development: from stem cell to adipocyte. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2005;40:229–242. doi: 10.1080/10409230591008189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park DY, Ahn YT, Huh CS, Jeon SM, Choi MS. The inhibitory effect of Lactobacillus plantarum KY1032 cell extract on the adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 Cells. J Med Food. 2011;14:670–675. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2010.1355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park SY, Cho SA, Kim SH, Lim SD. Physiological characteristics and anti-obesity effect of Lactobacillus plantarum Q180 isolated from feces. Korean J Food Sci An. 2014;34:645–653. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.5.647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramirez-Zacarias JL, Castro-Munozledo F, Kuri-Harcuch W. Quantitation of adipose conversion and triglycerides by staining intracytoplasmic lipids with Oil red O. Histochem. 1992;97:493–497. doi: 10.1007/BF00316069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rhyu J, Kim MS, You MK, Bang MA, Kim HA. Pear pomace water extract inhibits adipogenesis and induces apoptosis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Nutr Res Pract. 2014;8:33–39. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2014.8.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosen ED, Sarraf P, Troy AE, Brawin G, Moore K, Milstone DS, Spiegelman BM, Mortensen RM. PPAR gamma is required for the differentiation of adipose tissue in vivo and in vitro. Mol Cell. 1999;4:611–617. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80211-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samuelsson L, Stromberg K, Vikman K, Bjursell G, Enerback S. The CCAAT/ enhancer binding protein and its role in adipocyte differentiation: Evidence for direct involvement in terminal adipocyte development. EMBO J. 1991;10:3787–3793. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04948.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takemura N, Okubo T, Sonoyama K. Lactobacillus plantarum strain No. 14 reduces adipocyte size in mice fed high-fat diet. Exp Biol Med. 2010;235:849–856. doi: 10.1258/ebm.2010.009377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taranto MP, Medici M, Perdigon G, Holdago APR, Valdez GF. Evidence for cholesterolemic effect of Lactobacillus reuteri in hypercholesterolemic mice. J Dairy Sci. 1998;81:2336–2340. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)70123-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tontonoz P, Hu E, Spiegelman BM. Stimulation of adipogenesis in fibroblasts by PPARγ2, a lipid activated transcription factor. Cell. 1994;79:1147–1156. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90006-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang YW, Jones PJ. Conjugated linoleic acid and obesity control: efficacy and mechanisms. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:941–955. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]