Skip to main content
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy logoLink to Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy
editorial
. 2017 Oct 9;5(6):111–113. doi: 10.1177/2051013617733259

It is time to accelerate building local vaccine adjuvant manufacturing capacity

Christopher B Fox 1,
PMCID: PMC5933535  PMID: 29998215

Recent accomplishments in vaccine adjuvant development are enabling new vaccines for previously intractable diseases, increased immunity in immunocompromised populations and greater global pandemic preparedness.1,2 To ensure that the potential benefits of vaccine adjuvant technology are widely accessible, it is essential that adjuvant molecules and formulations, as well as the know-how to manufacture and clinically evaluate them, are made available to developing country manufacturers.

Developing country vaccine manufacturers represent a vibrant and growing community that plays an increasingly central role in the development and manufacture of vaccines globally. For instance, the Serum Institute of India produces 1.2 billion vaccine doses, making it the world’s largest vaccine manufacturer.3 Nevertheless, the development and manufacture of modern vaccine adjuvants is still carried out largely by established companies in developed countries. The transfer of vaccine adjuvant technology to developing country partners will enable greater adjuvant manufacturing capacity and pandemic preparedness, improve local regulatory efficiency since both antigen and adjuvant will be manufactured locally, and enable manufacturers to develop novel vaccines against challenging diseases with high local burden that are not a priority for companies in the developed world. Furthermore, there is the potential for increased cost-effectiveness since labor and materials may be less expensive in developing countries,4 although this is not necessarily always the case.5

There are already encouraging signs that successful adjuvant technology transfer can be accomplished with significant potential impacts. For instance, since 2006 the World Health Organization’s Global Action Plan (GAP) for Influenza Vaccines (financed in large part by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority from the US Department of Human and Health Services), has enabled influenza vaccine manufacturing technology transfer, including adjuvants, to multiple developing country partners.69 By 2018, these efforts are anticipated to have resulted in a global manufacturing capacity increase of more than one billion influenza vaccine doses.10

Another encouraging example involves the novel malaria vaccine candidate, PvDBPII, in combination with the GLA-SE adjuvant, an oil-in-water emulsion containing a synthetic TLR4 ligand.11,12 PvDBPII was developed by the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology in New Delhi, India, and was manufactured under cGMP conditions by Syngene International Limited in Bengaluru, India. The adjuvant manufacturing technology was transferred from IDRI in Seattle, USA to Gennova Biopharmaceuticals in Pune, India. Gennova subsequently manufactured the adjuvant under cGMP conditions and assessed physicochemical compatibility of the antigen–adjuvant mixture at their newly constructed Vaccine Formulation Center. In 2016, a phase I clinical study of the adjuvanted vaccine was initiated in India. To my knowledge, this represents the first clinical evaluation of a vaccine candidate containing a complex modern adjuvant manufactured entirely in India.

In order to accelerate the momentum represented by the above successes, it will be essential for partners from developed and developing countries to prioritize adjuvant technology as a key asset for vaccine development efforts. Partners in the developed world can engage in identifying suitable technology transfer recipients and indications of mutual interest, e.g. through Developing Country Vaccine Manufacturers Network events. Technology transfer recipients can encourage future potential partners by safeguarding the assets transferred and limiting development to those indications and areas identified through license agreements, thus protecting intellectual property of the transferring partner. Both partners can leverage creative funding mechanisms, ideally including local government partners, especially since such funding may be necessary to tackle some neglected diseases that have little profit potential. Encouragingly, funding and/or training opportunities encouraging collaborations between developed and developing countries are available.13,14

Potential challenges associated with technology transfer efforts include lack of investment in research and development capacity by local manufacturers and governments, lack of ability to recruit and retain qualified personnel, uncertainty regarding the local vaccine market potential, inability to acquire specific equipment and supplies in a timely manner, differences in regulatory requirements from local and regional agencies, and difficulties associated with local infrastructure and environmental conditions.5,6,15 While significant, such challenges are worth addressing in order to access the potentially significant benefits of technology transfer, including cost-effectiveness, platform innovation, faster time to local markets, ability to tailor compositions and technologies to local conditions and increased local and global health security.4,5,15,16

Adjuvants are anticipated to play a major role in the development of next-generation vaccines as well as in global pandemic preparedness. Ensuring developing country partners can access adjuvant technology, including manufacturing and clinical testing aspects, will accelerate the impact of such vaccines in the developing world.

Footnotes

Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest statement: The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1. O’Hagan DT, Fox CB. Are we entering a new age for human vaccine adjuvants? Expert Rev Vaccines 2015; 14: 909–911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Reed SG, Orr MT, Fox CB. Key roles of adjuvants in modern vaccines. Nat Med 2013; 19: 1597–1608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gupta PV. Serum Institute produces over 1.2 billion vaccine doses annually. ETHealthWorld. New Delhi, 2017. http://health.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/industry/serum-institute-produces-over-1-2-billion-vaccine-doses-annually/59124716 (accessed 28 July 2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Padmanabhan S, Amin T, Sampat B, et al. Intellectual property, technology transfer and developing country manufacture of low-cost HPV vaccines: a case study of India. Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28: 671–678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. World Health Organization. Increasing access to vaccines through technology transfer and local production. Geneva: WHO, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fox CB, Huynh C, O’Hara MK, et al. Technology transfer of oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant manufacturing for pandemic influenza vaccine production in Romania. Vaccine 2013; 31: 1633–1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Stavaru C, Onu A, Lupulescu E, et al. Technology transfer of oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant manufacturing for pandemic influenza vaccine production in Romania: preclinical evaluation of split virion inactivated H5N1 vaccine with adjuvant. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2016; 12: 1009–1026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ventura R, Brunner L, Heriyanto B, et al. Technology transfer of oil-in-water vaccine-adjuvant for strengthening pandemic influenza preparedness in Indonesia. Vaccine 2013; 31: 1641–1645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Grohmann G, Francis DP, Sokhey J, et al. Challenges and successes for the grantees and the Technical Advisory Group of WHO’s influenza vaccine technology transfer initiative. Vaccine 2016; 34: 5420–5424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. World Health Organization. Report of the ninth meeting with international partners on prospects for influenza vaccine technology transfer to developing country vaccine manufacturers. Geneva: WHO, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Multi Vaccines Development Program. P.vivax, PvDBPII, 2017. www.mvdp.org.in/P_vivax.php (accessed 28 July 2017).
  • 12. Jayaraman K. India opens malaria vaccine center. Nat Med 2012; 18: 332–333.22395683 [Google Scholar]
  • 13. National Institutes of Health. International research in infectious diseases, including AIDS (R01), PAR-17-142, 2017. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-17–142.html (accessed 28 July 2017).
  • 14. World Health Organization. EDCTP-TDR clinical research and development fellowships, 2017. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/255301/1/WHO-HIS-TTi-17.4-eng.pdf (accessed 28 July 2017).
  • 15. Nannei C, Chadwick C, Fatima H, et al. Considerations for sustainable influenza vaccine production in developing countries. Vaccine 2016; 34: 5425–5429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kulkarni PS, Socquet M, Jadhav SS, et al. Challenges and opportunities while developing a Group A meningococcal conjugate vaccine within a product development partnership: a manufacturer’s perspective from the Serum Institute of India. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61: S483–S488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES