Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 4.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2016 Oct 26;174(3):269–282. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32509

Genetic variants associated with risk of Alzheimer’s disease contribute to cognitive change in midlife: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

Jan Bressler 1, Thomas H Mosley 2, Alan Penman 2, Rebecca F Gottesman 3, B Gwen Windham 2, David S Knopman 4, Lisa M Wruck 5,#, Eric Boerwinkle 1,6,*
PMCID: PMC5935000  NIHMSID: NIHMS957889  PMID: 27781389

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia and is characterized by impairment in memory, behavioral changes, and gradual loss of autonomy. Since there is a long latent period prior to diagnosis, the aim of this study was to determine whether twenty single nucleotide polymorphisms identified in genome-wide association analyses of AD are associated with cognitive change in 8,320 white and 2,039 African-American middle-aged adults enrolled in the prospective Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Cognition was evaluated using the Delayed Word Recall Test (DWRT; verbal memory), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST; processing speed), and Word Fluency Test (WFT; executive function). General linear models were used to assess mean differences in 6-year change in test scores among individuals categorized by genotype after adjusting for age, gender, and years of education. Addition of the minor allele for rs670139 (MS4A4E), rs9331896 (CLU), and rs12155159 (NME8) was nominally associated with change on the DWRT, DSST, and WFT, respectively, in whites. The ZCWPW1 (rs1476679) and CDS33 (rs3865444) variants were nominally associated with change on the DWRT and WFT in African-Americans. For rs670139 and rs9331896 the association was only significant in individuals bearing at least one APOE ε4 allele in stratified analyses. An unweighted genetic risk score aggregating the risk alleles for 15 polymorphisms was not associated with change in cognitive function. Although the AD-associated genetic variants appear to have small effects on early cognitive change, replication will be required to establish whether there is a discernible influence on cognitive status in midlife.

Keywords: Genetic epidemiology, Cognition, Alzheimer’s disease, Association study

INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia [Alzheimer’s Association 2015] and is characterized by significant impairment in memory, behavioral changes, and gradual loss of autonomy. Despite relatively high heritability estimates [Gatz et al. 2006], until recently the only genetic variant shown to reproducibly confer increased risk of common late-onset AD was the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele [Corder et al. 1993; Strittmatter et al. 1993]. The current availability of high-density genotyping arrays and the haplotype map of the human genome generated by the International HapMap Project [International HapMap Consortium 2005] has facilitated genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of the relationships between large numbers of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) measured simultaneously and risk for common diseases to identify novel genes or loci influencing a given phenotype. Twenty novel loci for late-onset AD have recently been identified in six large-scale GWAS [Harold et al. 2009; Hollingworth et al. 2011; Lambert et al. 2009; Lambert et al. 2013; Naj et al. 2011; Seshadri et al. 2010].

Low or declining scores on cognitive tests, particularly those that assess episodic memory, have been found to predict the later development of AD in epidemiological studies [Backman et al. 2005; Elias et al. 2000; Rubin et al. 1998; Small et al. 2000; Tierney et al. 2005]. For example, a preclinical phase of reduced cognitive functioning in dementia-free individuals as assessed by a battery of neuropsychological tests was shown to precede the appearance of probable AD by more than 20 years in a large prospective study carried out in the Framingham Cohort [Elias et al. 2000]. Similarly, when the rate of cognitive decline was compared in Swedish participants in the Kungsholmen Project who developed Alzheimer’s disease and those who remained unimpaired, there was an accelerated period of change observed prior to diagnosis based on a global screening test of cognitive status [Small et al. 2000]. Although there have been several previous investigations of the association between individual AD loci and cognitive function [Carrasquillo et al. 2015; Chibnik et al. 2011; Hamilton et al. 2011; Marden et al. 2016; Mengel-From et al. 2011; Pedraza et al. 2014; Sweet et al. 2012; Thambisetty et al. 2013; Verhaaren et al. 2013; Vivot et al. 2015], few have been carried out in populations of non-European descent [Pedraza et al. 2014] [Marden et al. 2016] or have examined whether the variants that mediate dementia risk at older ages already exert their effects in midlife before diagnostic criteria for AD are met [Marden et al. 2016; Verhaaren et al. 2013]. The aim of this study was to determine whether the twenty SNPs identified in GWAS of AD were also associated with baseline cognitive function and cognitive change in middle age in the large biracial prospective Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort study. The cognitive battery used in the ARIC study was originally selected to sample cognitive domains involved in later life neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular diseases, and includes three tests (Delayed Word Recall Test (verbal memory); Digit Symbol Substitution Test (processing speed); and the Word Fluency Test (executive function) that were administered to all participants at the second (1990-1992) and fourth (1996-1998) clinical examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

The ARIC Study is a prospective longitudinal investigation of the development of atherosclerosis and its clinical sequelae in which 15,792 individuals aged 45 to 64 years were enrolled at baseline. A detailed description of the ARIC study has been reported previously [ARIC investigators1989]. At the inception of the study in 1987-1989, participants were selected by probability sampling from four communities in the United States: Forsyth County, North Carolina; Jackson, Mississippi (African-Americans only); the suburbs of Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Washington County, Maryland. Four examinations were carried out at three-year intervals (exam 1, 1987-1989; exam 2, 1990-1992; exam 3, 1993-1995; exam 4, 1996-1998. Subjects were contacted annually to update their medical histories between examinations. Cognitive testing was performed at exams 2 and 4. Individuals were not included in this analysis if they were neither African-American nor white (n = 48), were African-Americans from the Minnesota or Maryland field centers due to the small numbers of individuals recruited from these sites (n = 55), restricted use of their DNA (n = 45), had a history of physician-diagnosed stroke (n = 369) or unknown history of stroke (n = 31), or did not attend the second (n = 1,431) or fourth (n = 2,650) clinical examination. Additional exclusions were made for missing all genotype data (n = 34), missing cognitive data for any of the three neuropsychological tests at either visit 2 (n = 182) or visit 4 (n = 299), having test scores out of range (n = 2), or for missing information concerning the highest level of education completed (n =19) or other covariates used in the regression models (n = 268). The final study sample consisted of 8,320 white and 2,039 African-American men and women. Written informed consent was provided by all study participants, and the study design and methods were approved by institutional review boards at the collaborating medical institutions. The research with human subjects was performed in compliance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Cognitive Tests

Cognitive function was assessed by three neuropsychological tests at the second and fourth clinical examinations and have been described previously [Cerhan et al. 1998]: 1) The Delayed Word Recall Test (DWRT) is a measure of verbal learning and recent memory in which the participant is required to use each of 10 common nouns in a sentence. After a 5-minute delay (during which another non-verbal test is given), the participant is asked to recall the 10 nouns. The DWRT score is the number of correct words recalled (range 0 – 10) [Knopman and Ryberg 1989]; 2) The Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) is a subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised that tests processing speed and requires timed translation of numbers to symbols using a key with paired symbols and digits. The total number of correct translations within 90 seconds determines the score (range 0 – 93) [Wechsler 1981]; and 3) The Word Fluency Test (WFT) is a measure of executive function. In three separate 1-minute trials, the subject is asked to generate as many words as possible beginning with the letters F, A, and S. The score is the combined total of correct words produced [Lezak 1995; Tombaugh et al. 1999]. The tests were administered by trained interviewers in a standardized order and were given in a single session. For all of the neuropsychological tests, lower scores indicate a lower measure of cognition. Six-year change in cognitive function was analyzed as the difference between the test score obtained at the later clinic visit and the test score obtained at the earlier visit for each neuropsychological test.

Clinical and Laboratory Measurements

The clinical and laboratory measurements for this study were assessed during the second clinical examination with the exception of education which was evaluated at the baseline examination and have been described previously [Bressler et al. 2015]. Education was included as a covariate in regression models as an ordinal variable based on the highest level attained (≤ 11 years; 11 -16 years; > 16 years). Plasma total cholesterol and triglycerides were measured by enzymatic methods [Nagele et al. 1984; Siedel et al. 1983], and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was calculated [Friedewald et al. 1972]. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as LDL cholesterol ≥130 mg/dL (3.36 mmol/L) [Adult Treatment Panel III 2002]. High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was measured after dextran-magnesium precipitation of non-HDL [Warnick et al. 1982]. Blood pressure was measured three times while seated using a random-zero sphygmomanometer and the last two measurements were averaged for analysis. Hypertension was defined by diastolic blood pressure of ≥ 90 mm Hg, systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mm Hg, or use of antihypertensive medication. Fasting serum glucose was measured by a standard hexokinase method on a Coulter DACOS chemistry analyzer (Coulter Instruments, Fullerton, CA, USA). The prevalence of diabetes was defined using a fasting glucose level ≥7.0 mmol/L, a nonfasting glucose level ≥11.1 mmol/L, and/or self-reported physician diagnosis or treatment for diabetes. Body weight and other anthropometric variables were measured by trained technicians according to standardized protocols. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms/(height in meters)2. Information on cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption was obtained using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and was classified as current, former, or never.

Genotyping of AD GWAS variants

In addition to the APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 polymorphism [Weisgraber et al. 1981], twenty genetic variants identified in GWAS of AD [Hollingworth et al. 2011; Lambert et al. 2009; Lambert et al. 2013; Naj et al. 2011] were examined in this study. Genotyping of the BIN1 (rs744373) [Seshadri et al. 2010] and APOE polymorphisms was performed using the TaqMan system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The sequences for primers and probes are available upon request. Since the APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 polymorphism is based on genetic variation at codons 112 (rs429358) and 158 (rs7412), two separate TaqMan assays were performed. The data for these two SNPs were combined to generate the six APOE genotypes. Allele detection was performed using the ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). The genotype call rate, or the percentage of samples to which a genotype was assigned, was determined prior to exclusion of individuals from the analysis and was 95.6 % for rs744373 and 92.3% for APOE. After the application of all exclusion criteria, the proportion of missing data for the BIN1 SNP was 4. 2% and was 6.6% for APOE.

The genotyping data for 15 of the remaining polymorphisms (see Table 1) were extracted from a genome-wide scan performed using the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA as previously described [Levy et al. 2009]. The quality control criteria for exclusion of individual SNPs were if no chromosomal location could be determined, if a SNP was monomorphic in both whites and African-Americans, if the call rate was < 95%, or the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium p-value was < 10−5. In addition, scans for study participants were removed from the analysis if the subject had not consented to use of their DNA, if there was genotype mismatch with 39 previously genotyped SNPs, if there was discordance between phenotypic sex and X-chromosome analysis, if the individual appeared to be a genetic outlier based on average identity by state statistics and principal components analysis using EIGENSTRAT [Price et al. 2006], or if there was suspected first-degree relationship with any other participant. After the application of all exclusion criteria, the study population included 9,345 white and 3,182 African-Americans. Imputation to approximately 2.5 million autosomal SNPs identified in HapMap Phase II CEU samples (release 22, NCBI build 36), or to 2.74 × 106 SNPs in a combined HapMap Phase II CEU and YRI reference panel (release 21, build 35) [Lettre et al. 2011] was performed using MACH v1.0.16 (http://www.sph.umich.edu/csg/abecasis/MaCH/) for whites and African-Americans, respectively. A threshold for Rsq, an estimate of the correlation between imputed and true genotypes, was set at 0.3 to filter imputation results.

Table I.

Genetic variants identified in GWAS of AD – allele frequencies by race. ARIC Study (1990 – 1992)

GWAS SNP dbSNP ID Major/Minor Allele Risk Allele Chrom Nearest Gene AA MAF White MAF p* Ref.
rs4147929 G/A A 19 ABCA7 4.7 16.6 <0.001 [Lambert et al. 2013]
rs744373 A/G G 2 BIN1 46.8 29.9 <0.001 [Seshadri et al. 2010]
rs7274581 T/C T 20 CASS4 21.7 NA [Lambert et al. 2013]
rs9349407 G/C C 6 CD2AP 19.4 25.7 <0.001 [Naj et al. 2011]
rs3865444 C/A C 19 CD33 7.4 32.6 <0.001 [Naj et al. 2011]
rs6485758 G/A NA 11 CELF1 5.6 29.8 <0.001 [Lambert et al. 2013]
rs9331896 T/C T 8 CLU 55.2 37.0 <0.001 [Lambert et al. 2013]
rs6656401 G/A A 1 CR1 6.6 18.6 <0.001 [Lambert et al. 2009]
rs11767557 T/C T 7 EPHA1 13.6 17.8 <0.001 [Naj et al. 2011]
rs17125944 T/C C 14 FERMT2 5.1 9.1 <0.001 [Lambert et al. 2013]
rs9271174 G/C NA 6 HLA-DRB1 21.7 27.1 <0.001 [Lambert et al. 2013]
rs35349669 C/T T 2 INPP5D 15.2 49.0 <0.001 [Lambert et al. 2013]
rs190982 A/G A 5 MEF2C 8.9 37.6 <0.001 [Lambert et al. 2013]
rs670139 G/T T 11 MS4A4E 41.6 41.6 0.787 [Hollingworth et al. 2011]
rs12155159 A/G NA 7 NME8 57.5 34.5 <0.001 [Lambert et al. 2013]
rs561655 A/G A 11 PICALM 16.3 34.0 <0.001 [Naj et al. 2011]
rs17057043 G/A NA 8 PTK2B 46.3 36.0 <0.001 [Lambert et al. 2013]
rs10498633 G/T G 14 SLC24A4 12.8 22.6 <0.001 [Lambert et al. 2013]
rs11218343 T/C T 11 SORL1 7.5 2.1 <0.001 [Lambert et al. 2013]
rs1476679 T/C T 7 ZCWPW1 5.6 30.2 <0.001 [Lambert et al. 2013]

GWAS, genome-wide association study; AD, Alzheimer’s disease, dbSNP, The National Center for Biotechnology’s Information SNP database; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; ID, identification; Risk allele, allele associated with AD risk in genome-wide association study; Chrom., chromosome; AA, African-American; MAF, minor allele frequency; p*, p-value for comparison of genotype frequencies between races; Ref.; reference; rs, reference SNP

The reported allele frequencies for the polymorphisms located near CD2AP, CR1, MS4A4E, PICALM, and PKT2B were calculated from measured genotyping data, while gene dosage for all other variants was imputed. Four additional SNPs (rs4147929 (ABCA7), rs35349669 (INPP5D), rs9271174 (HLA-DRB5-HLD-DRB1), and rs7274581 (CASS4) [Lambert et al. 2013] were derived after the genotyping data was imputed to the 1000 Genomes reference panel Phase I integrated variant set release (v3) haplotypes in NCBI build 37 (hg19). Rsq for all imputed SNPs was > 0.75 except for rs11767557 (EPHA1) (Rsq white = 0.63, Rsq African-American = 0.59) and rs9331896 (CLU) (Rsq white = 0.68). When the index AD GWAS SNP (rs10838725 (CELF1), rs28834970 (PTK2B), rs2718058 (NME8), and rs9271192 (HLA-DRB5-HLA-DRB1) [Lambert et al. 2013] was not available, a proxy SNP was selected at each locus (r2 > 0.7 in the 1000 Genomes Project CEU) using the annotation tool HaploReg version 3 [Ward and Kellis 2012].

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 9 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested using a χ2 goodness-of-fit test for individuals in each racial group. The proportions, means, and standard deviations were calculated for cardiovascular risk factors for individuals categorized by self-reported race. Comparisons were performed using chi square tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. General linear models were used to assess mean differences in cognitive function at baseline or 6-year cognitive change among groups of individuals categorized by genotype for each SNP assuming an additive genetic model and adjusting for age, gender, and years of education (model 1), or for age, gender, education and potential confounding variables including BMI, current smoking, current alcohol intake, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia (model 2) [Cerhan et al. 1998]. All variables except for education which was assessed at visit 1 were measured at the visit 2 examination. Analyses of rs7274581were only carried out for African-American study participants since this variant did not meet Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium expectations in whites. Tests of interaction between the AD GWAS variants and carriage of at least one APOE ε4 allele were conducted by including the main effects for each SNP and APOE ε4 carrier status in the general linear models, and introducing a multiplicative 2-way interaction term. In a secondary analysis, an unweighted genetic risk score was constructed for each individual by adding the number of risk alleles for each of 15 index SNPs identified in GWAS of AD for which the effect allele and direction of effect were known and that were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in both whites and African-Americans in order to evaluate the loci in aggregate in the general linear models. The SNPs were coded by assigning 1 to the risk-raising homozygous genotype, 0 to the heterozygote, and -1 to the risk-lowering homozygous genotype. The SNPs were not weighted by their effect sizes since the variants comprising the score were drawn from different meta-analyses [Hollingworth et al. 2011; Lambert et al. 2009; Lambert et al. 2013; Naj et al. 2011; Seshadri et al. 2010]. The results of all statistical analyses are reported separately by racial group. In addition, the summary statistics for the race-specific analyses were combined by performing inverse-variance meta-analyses using the program METAL [Willer et al. 2010]. A two-sided p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and the Bonferroni correction was used to adjust for multiple comparisons (0.05/20 variants × scores for 3 cognitive tests × change in scores for 3 cognitive tests × 2 racial groups = 0.00014).

RESULTS

The allele and genotype frequencies for twenty polymorphisms identified in GWAS of AD, shown in Table I, were in accordance with Hardy-Weinberg expectations for both white and African-American study subjects (p > 0.05) with the exception of rs7274581 (CASS4) in whites. Since the minor allele frequency for all of the polymorphisms examined with the exception of rs670139 differed significantly when the two racial groups were compared, all results are reported separately by race. The clinical and demographic characteristics of the study population, mean cognitive test scores, and mean 6-year change in cognitive test scores are presented in Table II. There were higher percentages of males, current alcohol drinkers, and individuals with 11-16 years of education, and lower percentages of current smokers and individuals with hypertension, diabetes, or obesity among white study participants than among African-American participants. White participants were also older with lower LDL and HDL cholesterol, and a higher level of triglycerides. The mean age for white and African-American study participants was 57.0 ± 5.6 years and 55.8 ± 5.7 years, respectively, at the time of the baseline cognitive examination.

Table II.

Clinical and demographic characteristics by race. ARIC Study (1990-1992)

White (N =8,320)
African-American (N = 2,039)
N N (%) N N (%)
Gender 8,320 2,039
Male 3,835 (46.1) 688 (33.7)
Female 4,485 (53.9) 1,351 (66.3)
Education 8,320 2,039
≤11 years 1,158 (13.9) 648 (31.8)
>11 years - ≤ 16 years 3,836 (46.1) 616 (30.2)
>16 years 3,326 (40.0) 775 (38.0)
Current smokers 8,320 1,560 (18.8) 2,039 437 (21.4)
Current alcohol use 8,320 5,437 (65.4) 2,039 691(33.9)
Hypertension 8,320 2,278 (27.4) 2,039 1,021 (50.1)
Diabetes 8,320 827 (9.9) 2,039 411 (20.2)
Obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) 8,320 1,988 (23.9) 2,039 880 (43.2)
Hypercholesterolemia 8,320 4,197 (50.4) 2,039 1,065 (52,2)
APOE ε4 allele carriers 7,883 2,166 (27.5) 1,793 734 (40.9)
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Age (years) 8,320 57.0 (5.6) 2,039 55.8 (5.7)
DBP, mm Hg 8,320 71.0 (9.6) 2,039 74.8 (10.2)
SBP, mm Hg 8,320 119.0 (17.1) 2,039 124.2 (18.8)
Glucose (mmol/L) 8,320 6.0 (1.6) 2,039 6.7 (2.9)
BMI (kg/m2) 8,320 27.3 (4.8) 2,039 29.9 (6.0)
Total cholesterol, mmol/L 8,320 5.39 (0.96) 2,039 5.43 (1.04)
LDL cholesterol, mmol/L 8,320 3.42 (0.91) 2,039 3.47 (1.01)
HDL cholesterol, mmol/L 8,320 1.27 (0.42) 2,039 1.40 (0.45)
Triglycerides, mmol/L 8,320 1.51 (0.75) 2,039 1.22 (0.61)
Genetic risk score 6,485 0.52 (2.32) 1,287 1.25 (1.87)
Cognitive Tests
Baseline
 DWRT (words) 8,320 6.8 (1.4) 2,039 6.3 (1.6)
 DSST (digit-symbol pairs) 8,320 49.8 (11.2) 2,039 33.3 (13.0)
 WFT (words) 8,320 35.3 (11.7) 2,039 29.9 (12.8)
6-year change
 DWRT (words) 8,320 -0.11 (1.50) 2,039 -0.24 (1.70)
 DSST (digit-symbol pairs) 8,320 -2.68 (6.42) 2,039 -1.90 (8.58)
 WFT (words) 8,320 -0.37 (7.87) 2,039 -1.00 (8.24)

N, number; BMI, body mass index; APOE, apolipoprotein E; SD, standard deviation; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein; DWRT, Delayed Word Recall Test; DSST, Digit Symbol Substitution Test; WFT, Word Fluency Test

The results of the primary analysis of the association between mean 6-year change in three domain-specific cognitive test scores (DWRT, DSST, and WFT) and each of twenty AD-associated SNPs is shown for whites in Table III and for African-Americans in Table IV. The genotypes for each SNP examined were coded with respect to the minor allele identified in the GWAS of AD so that the direction of effect could be easily compared. After adjustment for age, gender, and years of education, addition of the minor allele for rs670139 (MS4A4E), rs9331896 (CLU), and rs12155159 (NME8) was significantly associated with less cognitive decline on the DWRT (p = 0.026), DSST (p = 0.053), and WFT (p = 0.039), respectively, in white participants. In African-American participants, rs1476679 (ZCWPW1) was significantly associated with greater decline in scores on the DWRT (p = 0.030), while rs38655444 (CD33) was associated with less decline on the WFT (p = 0.045). While most of these associations were largely independent of demographic and biological factors that can influence cognition including BMI, diabetes, hypertension, current smoking, current alcohol intake, and high midlife LDL cholesterol when these were added to the regression models, the association between addition of the rs9331896 C allele and performance on the DSST in whites was no longer nominally significant (p-value minimally adjusted model = 0.053, p-value fully adjusted model = 0.065) (Tables SI and SII). When APOE ε4 carrier status was examined, having at least one APOE ε4 allele was significantly associated with greater cognitive decline as measured by the DWRT and DSST in whites, and the DWRT in African-Americans in both the minimally and fully adjusted models.

Table III.

Six-year cognitive change (White) ARIC Study (1990-1992 – 1996-1998)

dbSNPID N β DWRT
SE
p* β DSST
SE
p* β WFT
SE
p*
ABCA7 7,212 −0.017 0.034 0.617 −0.120 0.144 0.406 0.024 0.178 0.892
rs4147929
BIN1 7,986 −0.012 0.026 0.653 −0.063 0.109 0.564 0.001 0.135 0.997
rs744373
CASS4 NA
rs7274581
CD2AP 7,008 0.003 0.029 0.910 −0.033 0.124 0.789 0.104 0.154 0.497
rs9349407
CD33 7,376 −0.038 0.026 0.147 0.010 0.112 0.926 −0.070 0.138 0.610
rs3865444
CELF1 7,376 −0.007 0.027 0.801 −0.130 0.117 0.267 −0.142 0.144 0.324
rs6485758
CLU 7,376 −0.003 0.026 0.908 0.212 0.110 0.053 −0.102 0.135 0.451
rs9331896
CR1 7,035 0.015 0.033 0.636 0.113 0.140 0.419 0.022 0.172 0.898
rs6656401
EPHA1 7,376 0.022 0.032 0.503 0.024 0.139 0.861 −0.169 0.171 0.323
rs11767557
FERMT2 7,376 0.031 0.042 0.463 0.018 0.182 0.920 0.215 0.224 0.336
rs17125944
HLA−DRB1 7,212 0.006 0.028 0.826 0.025 0.120 0.834 0.019 0.148 0.900
rs9271174
INPP5D 7,212 0.032 0.025 0.198 −0.033 0.107 0.760 0.162 0.132 0.222
rs35349669
MEF2C 7,376 −0.001 0.025 0.973 0.005 0.109 0.964 0.107 0.134 0.427
rs190982
MS4A4E 7,110 0.056 0.025 0.026 −0.134 0.108 0.217 −0.150 0.133 0.259
rs670139
NME8 7,376 0.003 0.026 0.919 −0.122 0.111 0.269 0.281 0.136 0039
rs12155159
PICALM 7,105 −0.012 0.026 0.663 −0.085 0.113 0.456 0.012 0.139 0.932
rs561655
PTK2B 7,101 −0.016 0.026 0.552 −0.055 0.113 0.627 0.182 0.139 0.190
rs17057043
SLC24A4 7,376 0.003 0.030 0.910 −0.011 0.127 0.931 0.097 0.156 0.532
rs10498633
SORL1 7,376 −0.033 0.086 0.703 −0.210 0.367 0.566 −0.180 0.451 0.689
rs11218343
ZCWPW1 7,376 0.021 0.027 0.437 −0.024 0.115 0.836 −0.134 0.142 0.345
rs1476679
APOE ε4 7,883 −0.095 0.038 0.012 −0.548 0.160 0.001 −0.024 0.199 0.902
GRS 6,485 0.004 0.008 0.644 0.000 0.036 0.995 0.035 0.044 0.428

β, beta coefficient; SE, standard error; p*, results were adjusted for age, gender, and years of education; GRS, genetic risk score; NA, not available, variant did not meet Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium expectations

Table IV.

Six-year cognitive change (African-American) ARIC Study (1990-1992 – 1996-1998)

dbSNPID N β DWRT
SE
p* β DSST
SE
p* β WFT
SE
p*
ABCA7 1,594 0.060 0.140 0.669 0.952 0.716 0.184 −0.026 0.671 0.969
rs4147929
BIN1 1,934 0.032 0.055 0.563 −0.412 0.281 0.142 −0.414 0.265 0.119
rs744373
CASS4 1,594 −0.096 0.072 0.184 −0.562 0.368 0.127 −0.250 0.345 0.470
rs7274581
CD2AP 1,762 −0.090 0.074 0.223 −0.490 0.371 0.187 −0.129 0.352 0.713
rs9349407
CD33 1,597 −0.127 0.116 0.273 0.324 0.589 0.582 1.109 0.553 0.045
rs3865444
CELF1 1,597 0.141 0.130 0.276 −0.179 0.657 0.786 0.444 0.617 0.472
rs6485758
CLU 1,597 0.105 0.060 0.081 0.263 0.306 0.389 −0.096 0.288 0.739
rs9331896
CR1 1,685 0.004 0.117 0.971 −0.776 0.588 0.187 0.036 0.561 0.948
rs6656401
EPHA1 1,597 0.064 0.090 0.477 −0.049 0.454 0.914 −0.288 0.427 0.500
rs11767557
FERMT2 1,597 −0.131 0.135 0.333 −0.638 0.685 0.352 0.480 0.643 0.456
rs17125944
HLA−DRB1 1,594 0.083 0.072 0.255 −0.251 0.371 0.498 0.453 0.347 0.192
rs9271174
INPP5D 1,594 0.006 0.083 0.941 0.190 0.424 0.654 0.124 0.397 0.754
rs35349669
MEF2C 1,597 −0.113 0.106 0.286 0.163 0.538 0.762 −0.350 0.506 0.489
rs190982
MS4A4E 1,774 −0.089 0.058 0.124 0.464 0.291 0.111 0.172 0.276 0.534
rs670139
NME8 1,597 0.046 0.060 0.445 −0.205 0.306 0.502 −0.213 0.288 0.458
rs12155159
PICALM 1,773 0.045 0.078 0.563 0.266 0.393 0.499 0.200 0.373 0.593
rs561655
PTK2B 1,774 0.014 0.058 0.811 0.082 0.291 0.780 −0.433 0.276 0.117
rs17057043
SLC24A4 1,597 −0.125 0.090 0.168 −0.722 0.459 0.115 0.117 0.431 0.786
rs10498633
SORL1 1,597 0.014 0.112 0.903 0.482 0.568 0.396 −0.440 0.534 0.409
rs11218343
ZCWPW1 1,589 −0.283 0.130 0.030 0.216 0.662 0.744 0.487 0.623 0.435
rs1476679
APOE ε4 1,793 −0.170 0.082 0.037 −0.719 0.415 0.084 0.383 0.399 0.337
GRS 1,287 −0.015 0.026 0.561 −0.109 0.136 0.423 0.030 0.125 0.813

p*, results were adjusted for age, gender, and years of education

In a secondary analysis, the relationship between 6-year change in cognitive test scores and the five SNPs for which the association was found to be significant in the primary analysis was further examined after stratifying by APOE ε4 carrier status. While interaction between the MS4A4E rs670139 variant and APOE had not previously been described [Hollingworth et al. 2011], the association was only significant in those individuals bearing at least one ε4 allele for rs670139 and rs9331896 in whites in stratified analyses (Tables SIII and SIV). The five AD GWAS variants were then further tested for multiplicative interaction with APOE ε4 carrier status in regression models where the appropriate change in test score was evaluated as the outcome variable; no significant interaction between APOE ε4 and any of the AD GWAS SNPs was found (whites: DWRT, p interaction rs670139 = 0.307; DSST, p interaction rs9331896 = 0.068; WFT, p interaction rs12155159 = 0.480; African-Americans: DWRT, p interaction rs1476679 = 0.815; WFT, p interaction rs38655444 = 0.750).

The relationship between the AD GWAS variants including carriage of the APOE ε4 allele and baseline cognitive function was also evaluated after adjustment for age, gender, and years of education. Five of the AD GWAS SNPs were significantly associated with scores for at least one of the cognitive tests in whites (rs4147929 (ABCA7): DWRT p = 0.013; rs6485758 (CELF1): DWRT p = 0.042, DSST p = 0.011, and WFT p = 0.002; rs9331896 (CLU): DWRT p =0.047; rs17125944 (FERMT2): WFT p = 0.001; rs35349669 (INPP5D): WFT p = 0.010), and two were significantly associated with cognitive performance in African-Americans (rs3865444 (CD33): WFT p = 0.037; rs6656401 (CR1): DSST p = 0.029) (Tables V and VI). Only rs38655444 (CD33) was nominally significantly associated with both baseline performance and 6-year change in scores on the same test among African-Americans (p-value 6-year WFT score change = 0.045; p-value WFT baseline score = 0.037), while rs9331896 (CLU) was associated with six-year change in DSST scores but with DWRT scores at baseline for whites. When cognitive function at baseline was analyzed further using the fully adjusted regression model, all seven of the associations identified using the minimally adjusted model remained nominally significant, and an additional association between rs190982 (MEF2C) and decreased baseline DSST scores was detected in whites (p = 0.042) (Tables SV and SVI).

Table V.

Baseline cognitive test scores (White) ARIC Study (1990 - 1992)

dbSNPID N β DWRT
SE
p* β DSST
SE
p* β WFT
SE
p*
ABCA7 7,212 0.075 0.030 0.013 0.218 0.212 0.306 0.328 0.242 0.175
rs4147929
BIN1 7,986 0.011 0.023 0.638 −0.109 0.162 0.502 0.080 0.185 0.663
rs744373
CASS4 NA
rs7274581
CD2AP 7,008 0.003 0.026 0.897 −0.201 0.183 0.273 0.084 0.210 0.689
rs9349407
CD33 7,376 0.005 0.023 0.837 −0.090 0.165 0.586 −0.241 0.188 0.199
rs3865444
CELF1 7,376 0.050 0.024 0.042 0.439 0.172 0.011 0.620 0.196 0.002
rs6485758
CLU 7,376 0.045 0.023 0.047 −0.031 0.162 0.849 −0.024 0.184 0.894
rs9331896
CR1 7,035 0.015 0.029 0.605 0.115 0.206 0.576 0.172 0.235 0.466
rs6656401
EPHA1 7,376 0.012 0.029 0.689 −0.186 0.205 0.365 0.256 0.233 0.274
rs11767557
FERMT2 7,376 −0.058 0.038 0.129 −0.421 0.268 0.116 −1.034 0.305 0.001
rs17125944
HLA−DRB1 7,212 0.008 0.025 0.741 0.104 0.176 0.557 0.330 0.201 0.100
rs9271174
INPP5D 7,212 −0.030 0.022 0.187 −0.164 0.158 0.299 −0.466 0.180 0.010
rs35349669
MEF2C 7,376 0.031 0.023 0.170 −0.307 0.161 0.057 0.141 0.183 0.443
rs190982
MS4A4E 7,110 0.003 0.023 0.893 0.222 0.159 0.163 0.210 0.182 0.249
rs670139
NME8 7,376 0.010 0.023 0.666 0.186 0.163 0.255 −0.118 0.186 0.527
rs12155159
PICALM 7,105 0.008 0.024 0.748 0.113 0.167 0.497 −0.029 0.190 0.881
rs561655
PTK2B 7,101 −0.017 0.024 0.464 −0.220 0.166 0.184 −0.140 0.190 0.461
rs17057043
SLC24A4 7,376 0.018 0.026 0.486 0.317 0.186 0.089 0.362 0.212 0.089
rs10498633
SORL1 7,376 −0.038 0.077 0.625 0.586 0.540 0.278 −0.792 0.616 0.199
rs11218343
ZCWPW1 7,376 0.014 0.024 0.551 0.293 0.169 0.083 0.265 0.193 0.171
rs1476679
APOE ε4 7,883 −0.019 0.034 0.576 0.001 0.238 0.997 −0.054 0.271 0.842
GRS 6,485 −0.005 0.008 0.485 −0.006 0.053 0.906 −0.027 0.060 0.650

p*, results were adjusted for age, gender, and years of education

Table VI.

Baseline cognitive test scores (African-American) ARIC Study (1990 - 1992)

dbSNPID N β DWRT
SE
p* β DSST
SE
p* β WFT
SE
p*
ABCA7 1,594 0.051 0.122 0.675 0.824 0.850 0.333 0.747 0.878 0.395
rs4147929
BIN1 1,934 −0.027 0.048 0.573 0.056 0.332 0.865 0.214 0.345 0.535
rs744373
CASS4 1,594 −0.046 0.063 0.465 0.431 0.438 0.325 0.121 0.452 0.790
rs7274581
CD2AP 1,762 0.041 0.064 0.520 0.164 0.440 0.709 −0.161 0.464 0.729
rs9349407
CD33 1,597 0.099 0.101 0.329 −0.637 0.701 0.363 −1.522 0.730 0.037
rs3865444
CELF1 1,597 −0.074 0.113 0.513 0.563 0.782 0.472 0.077 0.815 0.925
rs6485758
CLU 1,597 0.051 0.053 0.330 −0.256 0.364 0.483 0.014 0.380 0.971
rs9331896
CR1 1,685 −0.137 0.102 0.180 1.518 0.696 0.029 −1.265 0.736 0.086
rs6656401
EPHA1 1,597 −0.033 0.078 0.673 0.005 0.541 0.993 −0.694 0.564 0.218
rs11767557
FERMT2 1,597 0.157 0.118 0.182 0.188 0.816 0.818 −0.459 0.850 0.589
rs17125944
HLA-DRB1 1,594 −0.016 0.063 0.799 0.820 0.440 0.062 0.348 0.454 0.444
rs9271174
INPP5D 1,594 0.009 0.072 0.905 0.274 0.503 0.586 −0.733 0.519 0.158
rs35349669
MEF2C 1,597 0.033 0.092 0.719 0.213 0.641 0.740 −0.942 0.668 0.159
rs190982
MS4A4E 1,774 0.044 0.050 0.376 −0.219 0.346 0.527 0.546 0.363 0.133
rs670139
NME8 1,597 −0.011 0.053 0.832 0.178 0.364 0.625 0.073 0.380 0.848
rs12155159
PICALM 1,773 0.010 0.068 0.888 0.189 0.468 0.687 −0.264 0.492 0.592
rs561655
PTK2B 1,774 −0.039 0.050 0.437 −0.267 0.346 0.441 −0.232 0.364 0.523
rs17057043
SLC24A4 1,597 0.116 0.079 0.140 0.329 0.546 0.548 0.575 0.569 0.313
rs10498633
SORL1 1,597 −0.024 0.098 0.803 0.016 0.677 0.981 0.372 0.705 0.598
rs11218343
ZCWPW1 1,589 0.016 0.114 0.887 0.736 0.790 0.351 −0.089 0.823 0.914
rs1476679
APOE ε4 1,793 0.054 0.070 0.445 −0.367 0.489 0.453 −0.428 0.506 0.398
GRS 1,287 −0.016 0.023 0.476 0.080 0.161 0.618 0.157 0.165 0.344

p*, results were adjusted for age, gender, and years of education

Meta-analyses with increased sample sizes achieved by combining the race-specific results for both 6-year cognitive change and baseline cognitive function were carried out. In the meta-analysis for 6-year cognitive change, one nominally significant association with less decline on the DSST was identified for CLU rs9331896 using both the minimally and fully adjusted models (p-value minimally adjusted model = 0.035, p-value fully adjusted model = 0.044) (Tables SVII and SIX). The meta-analysis for baseline cognitive function revealed seven nominal associations with the AD GWAS SNPs after adjustment for age, gender, and years of education (rs4147929 (ABCA7): DWRT p = 0.011; rs6485758 (CELF1): DSST p = 0.008, WFT p = 0.002; rs9331896 (CLU): DWRT p = 0.029; rs17125944 (FERMT2): WFT: p = 0.001; rs35349669 (INPP5D): WFT p = 0.004; rs10498633 (SLC24A4): WFT: p = 0.051) (Table SVIII), and these were essentially similar after further adjustment for risk factors related to cognition (Table SX).

A genetic risk score was calculated by combining the number of risk alleles for each of the 15 loci for which the AD risk allele was known from the GWAS to examine the effect of the genetic variants in aggregate on cognitive function. In this exploratory analysis, no association between the genetic risk score and either baseline cognitive status or 6-year score change for any of the cognitive tests was observed (Tables III, IV, V, and VI).

None of the associations described above remained significant after correction for multiple comparisons when the number of genetic variants and phenotypes tested in the two racial groups were considered (p < 0.00014).

DISCUSSION

Neurocognitive test scores and six-year change in scores were evaluated in the ARIC study as a possible endophenotype for the loss of short-term memory and reduced executive function characteristic of AD. Information processing speed is also known to decline with age [Der and Deary 2006; Salthouse 1996], and low scores on the DSST have been associated with both incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia [Lopez et al. 2003a; Twamley et al. 2006]. Because there is no biomarker that can be used to confirm the clinical diagnosis and there is often a mixture of vascular and AD pathology found on autopsy [Fernando et al. 2004; Lopez et al. 2003b; Schneider et al. 2007], genetic studies of AD based on case status may be complicated by substantial phenotypic heterogeneity. Moreover, the long latent period prior to diagnosis can result in misclassification of controls who may later develop dementia [Elias et al. 2000; Snowdon et al. 1997; Sperling et al. 2011], and lead to survivor bias where individuals who would have been classified as cases have died from other causes. Accordingly, genetic analysis of heritable quantitative endophenotypes such as cognitive function that are often considered as intermediates in the causal chain leading from risk allele to clinical disease may help to uncover loci that increase or reduce susceptibility to dementia in its preclinical phase [Bennett et al. 2009; Carmelli et al. 2002; Gottesman and Gould 2003; McClearn et al. 1997; Shulman et al. 2010; Swan et al. 1990].

Significant associations between variants in or near three different genes identified in GWAS of late-onset AD and mean change in scores on tests of cognitive function over a six-year period were found for white middle-aged participants in the ARIC study (MS4A4E, CLU, and NME8), and two variants were identified in African-Americans (ZCWPW1 and CD33) in the primary analysis after adjustment for age, gender, and education. Examination of the association of the AD GWAS variants and baseline cognitive function also revealed significant associations with seven of the polymorphisms (ABCA7, CELF1, CLU, FERMT2, and INPP5D in whites, and CR1 and CD33 in African-Americans). For both 6-year cognitive change and cognitive performance at baseline, there was no overlap between the significantly associated variants identified in whites and those detected in African-Americans. In addition, only one of the SNPs (rs6485758 (CELF1)) was associated with higher scores on all three cognitive tests at baseline in whites while none of the variants appeared to influence more than one cognitive domain in African-Americans. A meta-analysis combining race-specific results for 6-year cognitive change revealed an association between CLU rs9331896 and performance on the DSST; genetic variants in ABCA7, CELF1, CLU, FERMT2, INPP5D, and SLC24A4 were found to be possible determinants of baseline cognitive function in a second meta-analysis. However, none of the associations observed between cognitive function and the AD GWAS loci remained significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

Unexpectedly, the association detected for the sequence variant nearest to MS4A4E (rs670139) and a test of delayed word recall in whites was in the opposite direction from expectation based on the association with AD in the GWAS. In these reports, the MS4A4E SNP was a risk allele for AD [Hollingworth et al. 2011; Naj et al. 2011] while there was an association with less cognitive decline for subjects in the ARIC cohort. MS4A4E, a gene with no previously identified function, is part of a gene cluster whose members have a common genomic structure including a transmembrane domain found in cell surface proteins [Liang et al. 2001], and has been associated with Braak tangle and plaque scores in the parietal lobe of AD cases and cognitively normal controls [Karch et al. 2012]. Since cognitive function was assessed in the ARIC study in midlife in individuals without dementia, it is possible that the relationship between the MS4A4E SNP and AD, and the polymorphism and cognitive change may actually be different. In this view, this region may harbor susceptibility loci for clinical features of AD, or its risk factors, but is protective for early change in memory. Another possibility is that since the cognitive tests were administered to middle-aged adults whereas only 4% of those with AD are estimated to be younger than 65 years of age [Hebert et al. 2003], the relationship between rs670139 and cognitive function in particular may change over the life course so that MS4A4E is beneficial in early life and has different effects at older ages. This could potentially occur in response to a specific environmental exposure, or in the context of expression of other genes such as the APOE ε 4 allele as suggested by the results of the stratified analysis for rs670139. Alternatively, the MS4A4E variant may be associated with an aspect of cognitive function in AD patients that is not captured by the DWRT. It also cannot be excluded that the apparent reversal in the direction of associations between the SNP near MS4A4E and change in scores for the DWRT may be due to residual confounding or to chance. Similar considerations may apply to rs1476679 (ZCWPW1) and to rs3865444 (CD33) where addition of the minor allele was associated with greater 6-year decline on the DWRT and decreased scores at baseline on the WFT, respectively, in African-Americans but decreased susceptibility to AD [Lambert et al. 2013], and to rs4147929 (ABCA7) and rs6656401 (CR1) where addition of the minor allele was associated with higher scores in whites on the DWRT and in African-Americans on the DSST but with increased risk of AD.

The association between individual AD loci or a polygenic risk score constructed from these markers and cognitive function has been investigated previously, but only a few of these studies have included individuals who were of non-European descent [Marden et al. 2016; Pedraza et al. 2014] or assessed their impact in midlife [Marden et al. 2016; Verhaaren et al. 2013]. In the ARIC study, the addition of the minor allele for CLU rs9331896 was associated with less cognitive decline as assessed by the DSST and with higher scores at baseline for the DWRT in whites, and CR1 rs6656401 was associated with higher DSST scores at baseline in African-Americans. The association between cognitive function and these two loci as well as PICALM was examined in 1,666 subjects enrolled in the Religious Orders Study (ROS) and in the Rush Memory and Aging Project (MAP). ROS and MAP are two longitudinal studies of non-demented individuals whose mean age at the baseline examination was 75.5 and 81.0 years, respectively. Only CR1 rs6656401 was associated with a global measure of cognitive decline while genetic variants in CLU (rs11136000) and PICALM (rs7110631) were not found to predict cognitive change in these cohorts [Chibnik et al. 2011]. The CLU rs1113600 T allele is associated with reduced risk of AD [Harold et al. 2009; Lambert et al. 2009], and was associated with a higher composite cognitive score for both men and women 92-93 years of age at enrollment in a Danish birth cohort study, while the effect of variation in PICALM (rs3851179) [Harold et al. 2009] was restricted to males [Mengel-From et al. 2011]. The CLU rs11136000 C risk allele, was related to a more rapid trajectory of cognitive decline as measured by the 3MS global test of cognition in 1,831 subjects initially free of dementia in the Cardiovascular Health Study (mean age at baseline 71.7 years). CR1 (rs3818361) [Hollingworth et al. 2011] was associated with more rapid decline on the DSST in the same study, while PICALM (rs3851179 and rs541458 [Harold et al. 2009] was associated with an earlier age at midpoint of decline of the 3MS [Sweet et al. 2012]. The CLU rs11136000 risk allele was also associated with faster decline in memory as measured by the California Verbal Learning Test of word list delayed recall in 95 cognitively normal participants in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging who converted to MCI or AD (mean age 75.9 years at first assessment [Thambisetty et al. 2013]. Finally, the association between genetic variants in CLU (rs11136000), CR1 (rs6656401 and rs3818361), and PICALM (rs3851179) and several tests of memory was analyzed cross-sectionally in 2 groups of 268 African-Americans and 2,651 whites that included both AD cases and controls. This study provided nominally significant or suggestive evidence for an influence of CR1 on immediate recall in African-Americans, and of CLU on paragraph delayed recall in whites using the Logical Memory subtests from the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised [Pedraza et al. 2014].

There have been several more recent reports in which the AD GWAS loci have been evaluated more comprehensively and either eight [Vivot et al. 2015] or nine [Carrasquillo et al. 2015] AD-associated loci were tested for association with cognitive decline, including ABCA7, CD33, CLU, CR1, and MS4A4E that were nominally associated with cognitive phenotypes in the ARIC study. In a study of more than 2,000 older white participants (median age at first assessment 77 years) who were assessed longitudinally for progression to MCI or AD the CLU rs11136000 risk allele was associated with lower scores at baseline on a test of paragraph delayed recall from the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised Logical Memory subtest but not with 5-year decline in verbal memory while no associations were found for the other eight loci [Carrasquillo et al. 2015]. Only BIN1 (rs744373) and CR1 (rs3818361) out of the 8 non-APOE genetic polymorphisms examined were associated with rate of change over more than 10 years in global cognition and verbal fluency, respectively, in a study of 4,931 participants in the 3-C Dijon study (median age 74.0 years), and none were associated with decline in processing speed, visual memory, or premorbid mental abilities [Vivot et al. 2015]. In contrast, analyses of 158 SNPs in 11 genes involved in AD including BIN1, CLU, CR1, and PICALM showed no significant association with cognitive phenotypes such as a test of verbal fluency similar to the WFT in 505 participants from the Lothian Birth Cohort of 1921(mean age 79.1 years) and 998 participants from the Lothian Birth Cohort of 1936 (mean age 69.6 years) [Hamilton et al. 2011]. A genetic risk score that included 10 variants detected in GWAS of AD but excluded APOE ε 4 was also marginally associated with a compound test score for memory in 5,171 non-demented persons from the population-based Rotterdam Study (mean age 66.2 years) [Verhaaren et al. 2013], and a genetic risk score constructed from 22 AD-associated loci was associated with significantly faster decline in a composite memory score in 7,172 non-Hispanic white (mean age 63.0 years) but not in 1,081 non-Hispanic black participants (mean age 61.6 years) in the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study [Marden et al. 2016].

As outlined above, multiple studies have implicated CLU in analyses of cognitive function providing increased plausibility for the findings reported here. In support of our observations, Pedraza et al. found that the CLU rs11136000 T allele associated with decreased risk of AD was associated with higher scores on the Logical Memory delayed paragraph recall subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised in white study participants, while Carasquillo et al. reported that the CLU rs11136000 C risk allele was associated with lower scores at baseline on the same test [Carrasquillo et al. 2015; Pedraza et al. 2014]. In the ARIC study, addition of the minor rs9331896 C allele associated with reduced risk of AD was associated with higher scores at baseline on the DWRT, a test of word list delayed recall in which a list of 10 unrelated words are presented visually to the participant. CLU encodes an apolipoprotein that is highly expressed in the brain, and is present in amyloid plaques and cerebrospinal fluid from individuals with AD [Calero et al. 2000; Liang et al. 2008; McGeer et al. 1992; Roheim et al. 1979]. Clusterin can bind reversibly to Aβ [Ghiso et al. 1993; Zlokovic et al. 1996], and has been implicated in Aβ clearance across the blood-brain barrier [Bell et al. 2007; DeMattos et al. 2004]. Plasma concentrations of clusterin have been reported to be associated with atrophy of the entorhinal cortex and more rapid global cognitive decline in AD patients [Thambisetty et al. 2010], and were also negatively correlated with global cognitive function and with attention-processing speed as measured by the DSST in 664 participants in the Sydney Memory and Aging Study (mean age 78 years) [Song et al. 2012]. The nominal associations in whites between rs9331896 (CLU) and reduced risk of decline on the DSST as well as higher scores on a test of verbal memory at baseline that were also identified in the meta-analyses combining race-specific results may suggest that the rate of clearance of amyloid deposits is a physiological mechanism affecting cognitive status as early as middle age.

This study has a number of strengths including the prospective design and well-phenotyped study population in which individuals of both European and African ancestry are represented, the large sample size, the survey of 20 recently identified AD-associated loci, and the availability of longitudinal as well as cross-sectional measures of cognition acquired in midlife but there are also limitations. There was only one cognitive test used to assess each cognitive domain, and the tests were administered at a stage of life at which most individuals would not have experienced extensive cognitive decline particularly during the relatively short 6-year follow-up period. In addition, the common SNPs analyzed in this study may not be the causal variant even in individuals of European descent, and differences in linkage disequilibrium and allele frequency between whites and African-Americans could also result in variation in the ability to detect associations in non-European individuals as well as in the direction of effect. However, although there was no overlap with the variants identified in whites, there was nominal evidence for association of rs1476679 (ZCWPW1) with greater decline in verbal memory and of rs3865444 (CD33) with reduced decline in verbal fluency in the smaller sample of African-Americans. The variants tested in this study also had small effect sizes even in the large-scale meta-analyses in which they were discovered that may help to explain the absence of even nominal associations with cognition for ten of the AD GWAS SNPs examined in either racial group. Replication in additional population-based samples with participants drawn from a range of different age and ethnic groups will be required to confirm and extend these observations.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Tables

Acknowledgments

The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study is carried out as a collaborative study supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute contracts (HHSN268201100005C, HHSN268201100006C, HHSN268201100007C, HHSN268201100008C, HHSN268201100009C, HHSN268201100010C, HHSN268201100011C, and HHSN268201100012C), R01HL087641, R01HL59367, and R01HL086694; National Human Genome Research Institute contract U01HG004402; and National Institutes of Health contract HHSN268200625226C. The authors thank the staff and participants of the ARIC study for their important contributions. Infrastructure was partly supported by Grant Number UL1RR025005, a component of the National Institutes of Health and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research.

Footnotes

CONFLICT of INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. The ARIC investigators. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. American journal of epidemiology. 1989;129(4):687–702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. National Cholesterol Education Program Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alzheimer’s Association. 2015 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer’s Association. 2015;11(3):332–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Backman L, Jones S, Berger AK, Laukka EJ, Small BJ. Cognitive impairment in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychology. 2005;19(4):520–531. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.4.520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell RD, Sagare AP, Friedman AE, Bedi GS, Holtzman DM, Deane R, Zlokovic BV. Transport pathways for clearance of human Alzheimer’s amyloid beta-peptide and apolipoproteins E and J in the mouse central nervous system. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2007;27(5):909–918. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett DA, De Jager PL, Leurgans SE, Schneider JA. Neuropathologic intermediate phenotypes enhance association to Alzheimer susceptibility alleles. Neurology. 2009;72(17):1495–1503. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a2e87d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bressler J, Franceschini N, Demerath EW, Mosley TH, Folsom AR, Boerwinkle E. Sequence variation in telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) as a determinant of risk of cardiovascular disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. BMC medical genetics. 2015;16:52. doi: 10.1186/s12881-015-0194-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Calero M, Rostagno A, Matsubara E, Zlokovic B, Frangione B, Ghiso J. Apolipoprotein J (clusterin) and Alzheimer’s disease. Microscopy research and technique. 2000;50(4):305–315. doi: 10.1002/1097-0029(20000815)50:4<305::AID-JEMT10>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carmelli D, Swan GE, DeCarli C, Reed T. Quantitative genetic modeling of regional brain volumes and cognitive performance in older male twins. Biological psychology. 2002;61(1-2):139–155. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(02)00056-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Carrasquillo MM, Crook JE, Pedraza O, Thomas CS, Pankratz VS, Allen M, Nguyen T, Malphrus KG, Ma L, Bisceglio GD, Roberts RO, Lucas JA, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Machulda MM, Graff-Radford NR, Petersen RC, Younkin SG, Ertekin-Taner N. Late-onset Alzheimer’s risk variants in memory decline, incident mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of aging. 2015;36(1):60–67. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.07.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cerhan JR, Folsom AR, Mortimer JA, Shahar E, Knopman DS, McGovern PG, Hays MA, Crum LD, Heiss G. Correlates of cognitive function in middle-aged adults. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. Gerontology. 1998;44(2):95–105. doi: 10.1159/000021991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chibnik LB, Shulman JM, Leurgans SE, Schneider JA, Wilson RS, Tran D, Aubin C, Buchman AS, Heward CB, Myers AJ, Hardy JA, Huentelman MJ, Corneveaux JJ, Reiman EM, Evans DA, Bennett DA, De Jager PL. CR1 is associated with amyloid plaque burden and age-related cognitive decline. Annals of neurology. 2011;69(3):560–569. doi: 10.1002/ana.22277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, Roses AD, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA. Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science. 1993;261(5123):921–923. doi: 10.1126/science.8346443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. DeMattos RB, Cirrito JR, Parsadanian M, May PC, O’Dell MA, Taylor JW, Harmony JA, Aronow BJ, Bales KR, Paul SM, Holtzman DM. ApoE and clusterin cooperatively suppress Abeta levels and deposition: evidence that ApoE regulates extracellular Abeta metabolism in vivo. Neuron. 2004;41(2):193–202. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00850-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Der G, Deary IJ. Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey. Psychology and aging. 2006;21(1):62–73. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Elias MF, Beiser A, Wolf PA, Au R, White RF, D’Agostino RB. The preclinical phase of alzheimer disease: A 22-year prospective study of the Framingham Cohort. Archives of neurology. 2000;57(6):808–813. doi: 10.1001/archneur.57.6.808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fernando MS, Ince PG, Function MRCC, Ageing Neuropathology Study G Vascular pathologies and cognition in a population-based cohort of elderly people. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2004;226(1-2):13–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2004.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clinical chemistry. 1972;18(6):499–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gatz M, Reynolds CA, Fratiglioni L, Johansson B, Mortimer JA, Berg S, Fiske A, Pedersen NL. Role of genes and environments for explaining Alzheimer disease. Archives of general psychiatry. 2006;63(2):168–174. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ghiso J, Matsubara E, Koudinov A, Choi-Miura NH, Tomita M, Wisniewski T, Frangione B. The cerebrospinal-fluid soluble form of Alzheimer’s amyloid beta is complexed to SP-40,40 (apolipoprotein J), an inhibitor of the complement membrane-attack complex. The Biochemical journal. 1993;293(Pt 1):27–30. doi: 10.1042/bj2930027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gottesman II, Gould TD. The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. The American journal of psychiatry. 2003;160(4):636–645. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamilton G, Harris SE, Davies G, Liewald DC, Tenesa A, Starr JM, Porteous D, Deary IJ. Alzheimer’s disease genes are associated with measures of cognitive ageing in the lothian birth cohorts of 1921 and 1936. International journal of Alzheimer’s disease. 2011;2011:505984. doi: 10.4061/2011/505984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Harold D, Abraham R, Hollingworth P, Sims R, Gerrish A, Hamshere ML, Pahwa JS, Moskvina V, Dowzell K, Williams A, Jones N, Thomas C, Stretton A, Morgan AR, Lovestone S, Powell J, Proitsi P, Lupton MK, Brayne C, Rubinsztein DC, Gill M, Lawlor B, Lynch A, Morgan K, Brown KS, Passmore PA, Craig D, McGuinness B, Todd S, Holmes C, Mann D, Smith AD, Love S, Kehoe PG, Hardy J, Mead S, Fox N, Rossor M, Collinge J, Maier W, Jessen F, Schurmann B, Heun R, van den Bussche H, Heuser I, Kornhuber J, Wiltfang J, Dichgans M, Frolich L, Hampel H, Hull M, Rujescu D, Goate AM, Kauwe JS, Cruchaga C, Nowotny P, Morris JC, Mayo K, Sleegers K, Bettens K, Engelborghs S, De Deyn PP, Van Broeckhoven C, Livingston G, Bass NJ, Gurling H, McQuillin A, Gwilliam R, Deloukas P, Al-Chalabi A, Shaw CE, Tsolaki M, Singleton AB, Guerreiro R, Muhleisen TW, Nothen MM, Moebus S, Jockel KH, Klopp N, Wichmann HE, Carrasquillo MM, Pankratz VS, Younkin SG, Holmans PA, O’Donovan M, Owen MJ, Williams J. Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and PICALM associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nature genetics. 2009;41(10):1088–1093. doi: 10.1038/ng.440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Bienias JL, Bennett DA, Evans DA. Alzheimer disease in the US population: prevalence estimates using the 2000 census. Archives of neurology. 2003;60(8):1119–1122. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.8.1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hollingworth P, Harold D, Sims R, Gerrish A, Lambert JC, Carrasquillo MM, Abraham R, Hamshere ML, Pahwa JS, Moskvina V, Dowzell K, Jones N, Stretton A, Thomas C, Richards A, Ivanov D, Widdowson C, Chapman J, Lovestone S, Powell J, Proitsi P, Lupton MK, Brayne C, Rubinsztein DC, Gill M, Lawlor B, Lynch A, Brown KS, Passmore PA, Craig D, McGuinness B, Todd S, Holmes C, Mann D, Smith AD, Beaumont H, Warden D, Wilcock G, Love S, Kehoe PG, Hooper NM, Vardy ER, Hardy J, Mead S, Fox NC, Rossor M, Collinge J, Maier W, Jessen F, Ruther E, Schurmann B, Heun R, Kolsch H, van den Bussche H, Heuser I, Kornhuber J, Wiltfang J, Dichgans M, Frolich L, Hampel H, Gallacher J, Hull M, Rujescu D, Giegling I, Goate AM, Kauwe JS, Cruchaga C, Nowotny P, Morris JC, Mayo K, Sleegers K, Bettens K, Engelborghs S, De Deyn PP, Van Broeckhoven C, Livingston G, Bass NJ, Gurling H, McQuillin A, Gwilliam R, Deloukas P, Al-Chalabi A, Shaw CE, Tsolaki M, Singleton AB, Guerreiro R, Muhleisen TW, Nothen MM, Moebus S, Jockel KH, Klopp N, Wichmann HE, Pankratz VS, Sando SB, Aasly JO, Barcikowska M, Wszolek ZK, Dickson DW, Graff-Radford NR, Petersen RC, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging I. van Duijn CM, Breteler MM, Ikram MA, DeStefano AL, Fitzpatrick AL, Lopez O, Launer LJ, Seshadri S, consortium C. Berr C, Campion D, Epelbaum J, Dartigues JF, Tzourio C, Alperovitch A, Lathrop M, consortium E. Feulner TM, Friedrich P, Riehle C, Krawczak M, Schreiber S, Mayhaus M, Nicolhaus S, Wagenpfeil S, Steinberg S, Stefansson H, Stefansson K, Snaedal J, Bjornsson S, Jonsson PV, Chouraki V, Genier-Boley B, Hiltunen M, Soininen H, Combarros O, Zelenika D, Delepine M, Bullido MJ, Pasquier F, Mateo I, Frank-Garcia A, Porcellini E, Hanon O, Coto E, Alvarez V, Bosco P, Siciliano G, Mancuso M, Panza F, Solfrizzi V, Nacmias B, Sorbi S, Bossu P, Piccardi P, Arosio B, Annoni G, Seripa D, Pilotto A, Scarpini E, Galimberti D, Brice A, Hannequin D, Licastro F, Jones L, Holmans PA, Jonsson T, Riemenschneider M, Morgan K, Younkin SG, Owen MJ, O’Donovan M, Amouyel P, Williams J. Common variants at ABCA7, MS4A6A/MS4A4E, EPHA1, CD33 and CD2AP are associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nature genetics. 2011;43(5):429–435. doi: 10.1038/ng.803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. International HapMap Consortium. A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature. 2005;437(7063):1299–1320. doi: 10.1038/nature04226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Karch CM, Jeng AT, Nowotny P, Cady J, Cruchaga C, Goate AM. Expression of novel Alzheimer’s disease risk genes in control and Alzheimer’s disease brains. PloS one. 2012;7(11):e50976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Knopman DS, Ryberg S. A verbal memory test with high predictive accuracy for dementia of the Alzheimer type. Archives of neurology. 1989;46(2):141–145. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520380041011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lambert JC, Heath S, Even G, Campion D, Sleegers K, Hiltunen M, Combarros O, Zelenika D, Bullido MJ, Tavernier B, Letenneur L, Bettens K, Berr C, Pasquier F, Fievet N, Barberger-Gateau P, Engelborghs S, De Deyn P, Mateo I, Franck A, Helisalmi S, Porcellini E, Hanon O, European Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative I. de Pancorbo MM, Lendon C, Dufouil C, Jaillard C, Leveillard T, Alvarez V, Bosco P, Mancuso M, Panza F, Nacmias B, Bossu P, Piccardi P, Annoni G, Seripa D, Galimberti D, Hannequin D, Licastro F, Soininen H, Ritchie K, Blanche H, Dartigues JF, Tzourio C, Gut I, Van Broeckhoven C, Alperovitch A, Lathrop M, Amouyel P. Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nature genetics. 2009;41(10):1094–1099. doi: 10.1038/ng.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lambert JC, Ibrahim-Verbaas CA, Harold D, Naj AC, Sims R, Bellenguez C, DeStafano AL, Bis JC, Beecham GW, Grenier-Boley B, Russo G, Thorton-Wells TA, Jones N, Smith AV, Chouraki V, Thomas C, Ikram MA, Zelenika D, Vardarajan BN, Kamatani Y, Lin CF, Gerrish A, Schmidt H, Kunkle B, Dunstan ML, Ruiz A, Bihoreau MT, Choi SH, Reitz C, Pasquier F, Cruchaga C, Craig D, Amin N, Berr C, Lopez OL, De Jager PL, Deramecourt V, Johnston JA, Evans D, Lovestone S, Letenneur L, Moron FJ, Rubinsztein DC, Eiriksdottir G, Sleegers K, Goate AM, Fievet N, Huentelman MW, Gill M, Brown K, Kamboh MI, Keller L, Barberger-Gateau P, McGuiness B, Larson EB, Green R, Myers AJ, Dufouil C, Todd S, Wallon D, Love S, Rogaeva E, Gallacher J, St George-Hyslop P, Clarimon J, Lleo A, Bayer A, Tsuang DW, Yu L, Tsolaki M, Bossu P, Spalletta G, Proitsi P, Collinge J, Sorbi S, Sanchez-Garcia F, Fox NC, Hardy J, Deniz Naranjo MC, Bosco P, Clarke R, Brayne C, Galimberti D, Mancuso M, Matthews F, European Alzheimer’s Disease I. Genetic, Environmental Risk in Alzheimer’s D. Alzheimer’s Disease Genetic C. Cohorts for H, Aging Research in Genomic E. Moebus S, Mecocci P, Del Zompo M, Maier W, Hampel H, Pilotto A, Bullido M, Panza F, Caffarra P, Nacmias B, Gilbert JR, Mayhaus M, Lannefelt L, Hakonarson H, Pichler S, Carrasquillo MM, Ingelsson M, Beekly D, Alvarez V, Zou F, Valladares O, Younkin SG, Coto E, Hamilton-Nelson KL, Gu W, Razquin C, Pastor P, Mateo I, Owen MJ, Faber KM, Jonsson PV, Combarros O, O’Donovan MC, Cantwell LB, Soininen H, Blacker D, Mead S, Mosley TH, Jr, Bennett DA, Harris TB, Fratiglioni L, Holmes C, de Bruijn RF, Passmore P, Montine TJ, Bettens K, Rotter JI, Brice A, Morgan K, Foroud TM, Kukull WA, Hannequin D, Powell JF, Nalls MA, Ritchie K, Lunetta KL, Kauwe JS, Boerwinkle E, Riemenschneider M, Boada M, Hiltuenen M, Martin ER, Schmidt R, Rujescu D, Wang LS, Dartigues JF, Mayeux R, Tzourio C, Hofman A, Nothen MM, Graff C, Psaty BM, Jones L, Haines JL, Holmans PA, Lathrop M, Pericak-Vance MA, Launer LJ, Farrer LA, van Duijn CM, Van Broeckhoven C, Moskvina V, Seshadri S, Williams J, Schellenberg GD, Amouyel P. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nature genetics. 2013;45(12):1452–1458. doi: 10.1038/ng.2802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lettre G, Palmer CD, Young T, Ejebe KG, Allayee H, Benjamin EJ, Bennett F, Bowden DW, Chakravarti A, Dreisbach A, Farlow DN, Folsom AR, Fornage M, Forrester T, Fox E, Haiman CA, Hartiala J, Harris TB, Hazen SL, Heckbert SR, Henderson BE, Hirschhorn JN, Keating BJ, Kritchevsky SB, Larkin E, Li M, Rudock ME, McKenzie CA, Meigs JB, Meng YA, Mosley TH, Newman AB, Newton-Cheh CH, Paltoo DN, Papanicolaou GJ, Patterson N, Post WS, Psaty BM, Qasim AN, Qu L, Rader DJ, Redline S, Reilly MP, Reiner AP, Rich SS, Rotter JI, Liu Y, Shrader P, Siscovick DS, Tang WH, Taylor HA, Tracy RP, Vasan RS, Waters KM, Wilks R, Wilson JG, Fabsitz RR, Gabriel SB, Kathiresan S, Boerwinkle E. Genome-wide association study of coronary heart disease and its risk factors in 8,090 African Americans: the NHLBI CARe Project. PLoS genetics. 2011;7(2):e1001300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Levy D, Ehret GB, Rice K, Verwoert GC, Launer LJ, Dehghan A, Glazer NL, Morrison AC, Johnson AD, Aspelund T, Aulchenko Y, Lumley T, Kottgen A, Vasan RS, Rivadeneira F, Eiriksdottir G, Guo X, Arking DE, Mitchell GF, Mattace-Raso FU, Smith AV, Taylor K, Scharpf RB, Hwang SJ, Sijbrands EJ, Bis J, Harris TB, Ganesh SK, O’Donnell CJ, Hofman A, Rotter JI, Coresh J, Benjamin EJ, Uitterlinden AG, Heiss G, Fox CS, Witteman JC, Boerwinkle E, Wang TJ, Gudnason V, Larson MG, Chakravarti A, Psaty BM, van Duijn CM. Genome-wide association study of blood pressure and hypertension. Nature genetics. 2009;41(6):677–687. doi: 10.1038/ng.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lezak M. Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  34. Liang WS, Dunckley T, Beach TG, Grover A, Mastroeni D, Ramsey K, Caselli RJ, Kukull WA, McKeel D, Morris JC, Hulette CM, Schmechel D, Reiman EM, Rogers J, Stephan DA. Altered neuronal gene expression in brain regions differentially affected by Alzheimer’s disease: a reference data set. Physiological genomics. 2008;33(2):240–256. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00242.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Liang Y, Buckley TR, Tu L, Langdon SD, Tedder TF. Structural organization of the human MS4A gene cluster on Chromosome 11q12. Immunogenetics. 2001;53(5):357–368. doi: 10.1007/s002510100339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lopez OL, Jagust WJ, Dulberg C, Becker JT, DeKosky ST, Fitzpatrick A, Breitner J, Lyketsos C, Jones B, Kawas C, Carlson M, Kuller LH. Risk factors for mild cognitive impairment in the Cardiovascular Health Study Cognition Study: part 2. Archives of neurology. 2003a;60(10):1394–1399. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.10.1394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lopez OL, Kuller LH, Fitzpatrick A, Ives D, Becker JT, Beauchamp N. Evaluation of dementia in the cardiovascular health cognition study. Neuroepidemiology. 2003b;22(1):1–12. doi: 10.1159/000067110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Marden JR, Mayeda ER, Walter S, Vivot A, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ, Kawachi I, Glymour MM. Using an Alzheimer Disease Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Memory Decline in Black and White Americans Over 14 Years of Follow-up. Alzheimer disease and associated disorders. 2016 doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. McClearn GE, Johansson B, Berg S, Pedersen NL, Ahern F, Petrill SA, Plomin R. Substantial genetic influence on cognitive abilities in twins 80 or more years old. Science. 1997;276(5318):1560–1563. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5318.1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. McGeer PL, Kawamata T, Walker DG. Distribution of clusterin in Alzheimer brain tissue. Brain research. 1992;579(2):337–341. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90071-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mengel-From J, Christensen K, McGue M, Christiansen L. Genetic variations in the CLU and PICALM genes are associated with cognitive function in the oldest old. Neurobiology of aging. 2011;32(3):554 e557–511. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nagele U, Hagele EO, Sauer G, Wiedemann E, Lehmann P, Wahlefeld AW, Gruber W. Reagent for the enzymatic determination of serum total triglycerides with improved lipolytic efficiency. Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie. 1984;22(2):165–174. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1984.22.2.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Naj AC, Jun G, Beecham GW, Wang LS, Vardarajan BN, Buros J, Gallins PJ, Buxbaum JD, Jarvik GP, Crane PK, Larson EB, Bird TD, Boeve BF, Graff-Radford NR, De Jager PL, Evans D, Schneider JA, Carrasquillo MM, Ertekin-Taner N, Younkin SG, Cruchaga C, Kauwe JS, Nowotny P, Kramer P, Hardy J, Huentelman MJ, Myers AJ, Barmada MM, Demirci FY, Baldwin CT, Green RC, Rogaeva E, St George-Hyslop P, Arnold SE, Barber R, Beach T, Bigio EH, Bowen JD, Boxer A, Burke JR, Cairns NJ, Carlson CS, Carney RM, Carroll SL, Chui HC, Clark DG, Corneveaux J, Cotman CW, Cummings JL, DeCarli C, DeKosky ST, Diaz-Arrastia R, Dick M, Dickson DW, Ellis WG, Faber KM, Fallon KB, Farlow MR, Ferris S, Frosch MP, Galasko DR, Ganguli M, Gearing M, Geschwind DH, Ghetti B, Gilbert JR, Gilman S, Giordani B, Glass JD, Growdon JH, Hamilton RL, Harrell LE, Head E, Honig LS, Hulette CM, Hyman BT, Jicha GA, Jin LW, Johnson N, Karlawish J, Karydas A, Kaye JA, Kim R, Koo EH, Kowall NW, Lah JJ, Levey AI, Lieberman AP, Lopez OL, Mack WJ, Marson DC, Martiniuk F, Mash DC, Masliah E, McCormick WC, McCurry SM, McDavid AN, McKee AC, Mesulam M, Miller BL, Miller CA, Miller JW, Parisi JE, Perl DP, Peskind E, Petersen RC, Poon WW, Quinn JF, Rajbhandary RA, Raskind M, Reisberg B, Ringman JM, Roberson ED, Rosenberg RN, Sano M, Schneider LS, Seeley W, Shelanski ML, Slifer MA, Smith CD, Sonnen JA, Spina S, Stern RA, Tanzi RE, Trojanowski JQ, Troncoso JC, Van Deerlin VM, Vinters HV, Vonsattel JP, Weintraub S, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Williamson J, Woltjer RL, Cantwell LB, Dombroski BA, Beekly D, Lunetta KL, Martin ER, Kamboh MI, Saykin AJ, Reiman EM, Bennett DA, Morris JC, Montine TJ, Goate AM, Blacker D, Tsuang DW, Hakonarson H, Kukull WA, Foroud TM, Haines JL, Mayeux R, Pericak-Vance MA, Farrer LA, Schellenberg GD. Common variants at MS4A4/MS4A6E, CD2AP, CD33 and EPHA1 are associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Nature genetics. 2011;43(5):436–441. doi: 10.1038/ng.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pedraza O, Allen M, Jennette K, Carrasquillo M, Crook J, Serie D, Pankratz VS, Palusak R, Nguyen T, Malphrus K, Ma L, Bisceglio G, Roberts RO, Lucas JA, Ivnik RJ, Smith GE, Graff-Radford NR, Petersen RC, Younkin SG, Ertekin-Taner N. Evaluation of memory endophenotypes for association with CLU, CR1, and PICALM variants in black and white subjects. Alzheimer’s & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer’s Association. 2014;10(2):205–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nature genetics. 2006;38(8):904–909. doi: 10.1038/ng1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Roheim PS, Carey M, Forte T, Vega GL. Apolipoproteins in human cerebrospinal fluid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1979;76(9):4646–4649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rubin EH, Storandt M, Miller JP, Kinscherf DA, Grant EA, Morris JC, Berg L. A prospective study of cognitive function and onset of dementia in cognitively healthy elders. Archives of neurology. 1998;55(3):395–401. doi: 10.1001/archneur.55.3.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Salthouse TA. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological review. 1996;103(3):403–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Bang W, Bennett DA. Mixed brain pathologies account for most dementia cases in community-dwelling older persons. Neurology. 2007;69(24):2197–2204. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000271090.28148.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Seshadri S, Fitzpatrick AL, Ikram MA, DeStefano AL, Gudnason V, Boada M, Bis JC, Smith AV, Carassquillo MM, Lambert JC, Harold D, Schrijvers EM, Ramirez-Lorca R, Debette S, Longstreth WT, Jr, Janssens AC, Pankratz VS, Dartigues JF, Hollingworth P, Aspelund T, Hernandez I, Beiser A, Kuller LH, Koudstaal PJ, Dickson DW, Tzourio C, Abraham R, Antunez C, Du Y, Rotter JI, Aulchenko YS, Harris TB, Petersen RC, Berr C, Owen MJ, Lopez-Arrieta J, Varadarajan BN, Becker JT, Rivadeneira F, Nalls MA, Graff-Radford NR, Campion D, Auerbach S, Rice K, Hofman A, Jonsson PV, Schmidt H, Lathrop M, Mosley TH, Au R, Psaty BM, Uitterlinden AG, Farrer LA, Lumley T, Ruiz A, Williams J, Amouyel P, Younkin SG, Wolf PA, Launer LJ, Lopez OL, van Duijn CM, Breteler MM, Consortium C. Consortium G. Consortium E Genome-wide analysis of genetic loci associated with Alzheimer disease. Jama. 2010;303(18):1832–1840. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Shulman JM, Chibnik LB, Aubin C, Schneider JA, Bennett DA, De Jager PL. Intermediate phenotypes identify divergent pathways to Alzheimer’s disease. PloS one. 2010;5(6):e11244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Siedel J, Hagele EO, Ziegenhorn J, Wahlefeld AW. Reagent for the enzymatic determination of serum total cholesterol with improved lipolytic efficiency. Clinical chemistry. 1983;29(6):1075–1080. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Small BJ, Fratiglioni L, Viitanen M, Winblad B, Backman L. The course of cognitive impairment in preclinical Alzheimer disease: three- and 6-year follow-up of a population-based sample. Archives of neurology. 2000;57(6):839–844. doi: 10.1001/archneur.57.6.839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Snowdon DA, Greiner LH, Mortimer JA, Riley KP, Greiner PA, Markesbery WR. Brain infarction and the clinical expression of Alzheimer disease. The Nun Study. Jama. 1997;277(10):813–817. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Song F, Poljak A, Crawford J, Kochan NA, Wen W, Cameron B, Lux O, Brodaty H, Mather K, Smythe GA, Sachdev PS. Plasma apolipoprotein levels are associated with cognitive status and decline in a community cohort of older individuals. PloS one. 2012;7(6):e34078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sperling RA, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Bennett DA, Craft S, Fagan AM, Iwatsubo T, Jack CR, Jr, Kaye J, Montine TJ, Park DC, Reiman EM, Rowe CC, Siemers E, Stern Y, Yaffe K, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Morrison-Bogorad M, Wagster MV, Phelps CH. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer’s Association. 2011;7(3):280–292. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Strittmatter WJ, Saunders AM, Schmechel D, Pericak-Vance M, Enghild J, Salvesen GS, Roses AD. Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to beta-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1993;90(5):1977–1981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Swan GE, Carmelli D, Reed T, Harshfield GA, Fabsitz RR, Eslinger PJ. Heritability of cognitive performance in aging twins. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Twin Study. Archives of neurology. 1990;47(3):259–262. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530030025010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sweet RA, Seltman H, Emanuel JE, Lopez OL, Becker JT, Bis JC, Weamer EA, DeMichele-Sweet MA, Kuller LH. Effect of Alzheimer’s disease risk genes on trajectories of cognitive function in the Cardiovascular Health Study. The American journal of psychiatry. 2012;169(9):954–962. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11121815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Thambisetty M, Beason-Held LL, An Y, Kraut M, Nalls M, Hernandez DG, Singleton AB, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci L, Lovestone S, Resnick SM. Alzheimer risk variant CLU and brain function during aging. Biological psychiatry. 2013;73(5):399–405. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.05.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Thambisetty M, Simmons A, Velayudhan L, Hye A, Campbell J, Zhang Y, Wahlund LO, Westman E, Kinsey A, Guntert A, Proitsi P, Powell J, Causevic M, Killick R, Lunnon K, Lynham S, Broadstock M, Choudhry F, Howlett DR, Williams RJ, Sharp SI, Mitchelmore C, Tunnard C, Leung R, Foy C, O’Brien D, Breen G, Furney SJ, Ward M, Kloszewska I, Mecocci P, Soininen H, Tsolaki M, Vellas B, Hodges A, Murphy DG, Parkins S, Richardson JC, Resnick SM, Ferrucci L, Wong DF, Zhou Y, Muehlboeck S, Evans A, Francis PT, Spenger C, Lovestone S. Association of plasma clusterin concentration with severity, pathology, and progression in Alzheimer disease. Archives of general psychiatry. 2010;67(7):739–748. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Tierney MC, Yao C, Kiss A, McDowell I. Neuropsychological tests accurately predict incident Alzheimer disease after 5 and 10 years. Neurology. 2005;64(11):1853–1859. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000163773.21794.0B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tombaugh TN, Kozak J, Rees L. Normative data stratified by age and education for two measures of verbal fluency: FAS and animal naming. Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists. 1999;14(2):167–177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Twamley EW, Ropacki SA, Bondi MW. Neuropsychological and neuroimaging changes in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS. 2006;12(5):707–735. doi: 10.1017/S1355617706060863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Verhaaren BF, Vernooij MW, Koudstaal PJ, Uitterlinden AG, van Duijn CM, Hofman A, Breteler MM, Ikram MA. Alzheimer’s disease genes and cognition in the nondemented general population. Biological psychiatry. 2013;73(5):429–434. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Vivot A, Glymour MM, Tzourio C, Amouyel P, Chene G, Dufouil C. Association of Alzheimer’s related genotypes with cognitive decline in multiple domains: results from the Three-City Dijon study. Molecular psychiatry. 2015;20(10):1173–1178. doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ward LD, Kellis M. HaploReg: a resource for exploring chromatin states, conservation, and regulatory motif alterations within sets of genetically linked variants. Nucleic acids research. 2012;40:D930–934. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr917. Database issue. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Warnick GR, Benderson J, Albers JJ. Dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation procedure for quantitation of high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol. Clinical chemistry. 1982;28(6):1379–1388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wechsler D. The Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1981. [Google Scholar]
  70. Weisgraber KH, Rall SC, Jr, Mahley RW. Human E apoprotein heterogeneity. Cysteine-arginine interchanges in the amino acid sequence of the apo-E isoforms. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1981;256(17):9077–9083. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Willer CJ, Li Y, Abecasis GR. METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(17):2190–2191. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zlokovic BV, Martel CL, Matsubara E, McComb JG, Zheng G, McCluskey RT, Frangione B, Ghiso J. Glycoprotein 330/megalin: probable role in receptor-mediated transport of apolipoprotein J alone and in a complex with Alzheimer disease amyloid beta at the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1996;93(9):4229–4234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.9.4229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Tables

RESOURCES