Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1999 Aug;120(4):1183–1192. doi: 10.1104/pp.120.4.1183

Does Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment Affect Photochemical Energy Use by Evergreen Trees in Different Seasons? A Chlorophyll Fluorescence Study of Mature Loblolly Pine1

Graham J Hymus 1, David S Ellsworth 2, Neil R Baker 1, Stephen P Long 1,3,*
PMCID: PMC59352  PMID: 10444102

Abstract

Previous studies of the effects of growth at elevated CO2 on energy partitioning in the photosynthetic apparatus have produced conflicting results. The hypothesis was developed and tested that elevated CO2 increases photochemical energy use when there is a high demand for assimilates and decreases usage when demand is low. Modulated chlorophyll a fluorescence and leaf gas exchange were measured on needles at the top of a mature, 12-m loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) forest. Trees were exposed to ambient CO2 or ambient plus 20 Pa CO2 using free-air CO2 enrichment. During April and August, periods of shoot growth, light-saturated photosynthesis and linear electron transport were increased by elevated CO2. In November, when growth had ceased but temperatures were still moderate, CO2 treatment had no significant effect on linear electron transport. In February, when low temperatures were likely to inhibit translocation, CO2 treatment caused a significant decrease in linear electron transport. This coincided with a slower recovery of the maximum photosystem II efficiency on transfer of needles to the shade, indicating that growth in elevated CO2 induced a more persistent photoinhibition. Both the summer increase and the winter decrease in linear electron transport in elevated CO2 resulted from a change in photochemical quenching, not in the efficiency of energy transfer within the photosystem II antenna. There was no evidence of any effect of CO2 on photochemical energy sinks other than carbon metabolism. Our results suggest that elevated CO2 may increase the effects of winter stress on evergreen foliage.


Most previous studies of the effects of elevated pCO2 on photosynthesis have focused on carbon assimilation and metabolism (for review, see Drake et al., 1997). Changes in carbon assimilation at elevated pCO2 necessitate changes in the partitioning of absorbed energy between heat dissipation and photochemistry in the thylakoid membrane (Pammenter et al., 1993; Valentini et al., 1995; Drake et al., 1997). Modulated chlorophyll a fluorescence enables direct analysis of these processes (Ghashghaie and Cornic, 1994; Valentini et al., 1995). Previous fluorescence studies have shown contrasting effects of long-term elevation of pCO2 on photochemistry.

For instance, in young wheat plants exposed to elevated pCO2, a greater proportion of the absorbed light is used in photochemistry at high light (Habash et al., 1995). Such an increase in photochemical energy dissipation should diminish reversible photoinhibition, which would be evident as an increase in Fv/Fm. Consistent with this expectation, Jones et al. (1995) observed a higher midday Fv/Fm in the evergreen tree Arbutus unedo growing at elevated pCO2 in the field under drought stress. In contrast, Scarascia-Mugnozza et al. (1996) showed decreased photochemistry and increased photoinhibition in Quercus ilex at elevated pCO2 under drought in the field. Similarly, Roden and Ball (1996) observed a lower Fv/Fm in Eucalyptus macrorhyncha grown at elevated pCO2 during a heat stress treatment. This variation might be explained by differences in limitations to photosynthesis by carbon metabolism.

Following the theoretical model of Farquhar et al. (1980) and subsequent modification by Sharkey (1985), photosynthesis at light saturation may be limited by: (a) the amount of active Rubisco; (b) the rate of regeneration of RubP; and (c) the rate of Pi release by TPU (Harley et al., 1992). If photosynthesis is limited by the amount of active Rubisco, elevation of pCO2 will increase energy use in photochemistry and therefore electron flux through PSII (JPSII). Because Rubisco is not CO2 saturated at the present atmospheric pCO2, an increase in pCO2 results in an increase in vc that is larger than the decrease in vo. Therefore, there will be an increase in the use of NADPH and in turn an increase in JPSII. When RubP regeneration is limiting, an increase in pCO2 will result in an increase in vc, which is exactly offset by a decrease in vo (Drake et al., 1997). Therefore, although there will be a net increase in CO2 uptake, the rate of NADPH utilization and JPSII will be unaffected. When TPU is limiting, vc will not increase with an increase in pCO2, but vo will be decreased by inhibition of the oxygenation reaction (Sharkey, 1985). CO2 uptake will be unaffected by elevated pCO2, but the use of NADPH, and in turn JPSII, will be decreased. For example, at 25°C and using the parameters of Harley et al. (1992), an increase in pCO2 from 36 to 56 Pa would result in a 16% increase in JPSII if Rubisco was limiting, no change in JPSII if RubP was limiting, and a 14% decrease in JPSII if TPU was limiting. This analysis assumes that elevated pCO2 does not alter the rate of electron use by other processes such as Mehler reactions and nitrogen metabolism. However, there is no evidence that substantial changes in sinks for JPSII occur in elevated pCO2 (Epron et al., 1994; Habash et al., 1995; Bartak et al., 1996). Acclimatory losses of Rubisco or capacity for RubP regeneration have been observed in situ under elevated pCO2 (e.g. Gunderson and Wullschleger, 1994; Oechel et al., 1994; Curtis, 1996; Bryant et al., 1998; Rogers et al., 1998) and would complicate this conceptual model.

In evergreen species the limitation to light-saturated photosynthesis is likely to change with season. In these species photosynthesis continues throughout the times of the year when growth is environmentally restricted, e.g. by low temperature. At low temperatures, in which translocation may be inhibited, TPU limitation may occur (Socias et al., 1993). During periods of active growth, demand for carbohydrates may be high and photosynthesis limited by the amount of active Rubisco. From this conceptual framework, we developed the following hypothesis.

Elevated pCO2 has different effects on photochemistry, depending on the season. During the major periods of growth, light-saturated photosynthesis is limited by the amount of active Rubisco and elevated pCO2 increases JPSII, leading to decreased photoinhibition. During times of the year when growth has ceased and translocation may be inhibited by low temperature, photosynthesis is limited by TPU and elevated pCO2 decreases JPSII, leading to increased photoinhibition.

The FACE facility at the Duke Forest in North Carolina provided an opportunity to test these hypotheses. This experiment exposed mature, 12-m evergreen loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) trees to a pCO2 elevated 20 Pa above the current ambient level in open air (Hendrey et al., 1999). The lack of an enclosure was ideal for studying photoinhibition, which could be substantially decreased by the lower light levels within chamber enclosures (McLeod and Long, 1999). Moreover, mature trees have a large sink capacity and defined seasonal patterns of growth, yet have received little attention in terms of their response to elevated pCO2 (Lee and Jarvis, 1995; Saxe et al., 1998).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study site was a 32-ha even-aged P. taeda (loblolly pine) plantation in Duke Forest, NC (35o58′N, 79o05′W). The forest was located on clay-rich soils with low nitrogen and phosphorus availability (Ellsworth et al., 1995). The pine trees were 15 years old and 12 m tall in the summer of 1997. FACE technology was used to elevate ambient pCO2 by 20 Pa in three 30 m diameter circular forest plots (Lewin et al., 1994). The system has been described in detail elsewhere and is only briefly outlined here (Hendrey et al., 1999). Each ring was surrounded by a plenum connected via computer-controlled valves to 15-m vertical vent pipes. According to windspeed and direction, jets of air enriched in CO2 are released at a range of heights to maintain a uniform enriched pCO2 through the canopy within each ring.

Each elevated pCO2 ring was paired with an identical control ring in which air was added at the same volume and direction, but without pCO2 enrichment. Elevated pCO2 fumigation was maintained over 24 h except when ambient air temperatures dropped below 5°C (December–March). The mean pCO2 recorded at 1-min intervals throughout 1997 was 54.6 Pa in the treatment rings and 38 Pa over a 24-h period in the controls. Access to the canopy surface was via a central tower and telescopic platform (UL40, Upright, Charlotte, NC) within each ring.

Our first measurements were made within days of the start of CO2 fumigation in this FACE facility in September 1996. This foliage had appeared in April 1996 and had therefore developed fully under ambient pCO2. Subsequent measurements on this foliage cohort were made in February and April 1997. Measurements in August 1997, November 1997, and February 1998 were on foliage that had appeared in April of 1997 and had therefore developed fully under elevated pCO2. Measurements were also made in September 1996 in a FACE-prototype ring of the design described above, which had been established in 1993. The vegetation had been fumigated at a pCO2 of 55 Pa during each growing season (May–October) since 1993 (Ellsworth et al., 1995; Hendrey et al., 1999).

In Situ Chlorophyll a Fluorescence

A modulated chlorophyll fluorimeter and leaf clip (PAM 2000, Walz) were used to measure diurnal variation in Fo′, Fm′, and Fs following the method of Nogues et al. (1998). φPSII, qP, and Fv′/Fm′ were determined from each measurement of Fo′, Fm′, and Fs (Genty et al., 1989). Fascicle absorptance of α was determined using a quantum sensor and an external integrating sphere (LI-1800–12, LI-COR) following the procedures of Rackham and Wilson (1968). JPSII was estimated from φPSII using measured values of α and assuming that 50% of absorbed photon flux was distributed to PSII (Krall and Edwards, 1992; Ghashghaie and Cornic, 1994). Measurements of Fo and Fm were made following dark adaptation for 10 min to determine Fv/Fm. All of the above measurements were made under prevailing light conditions on two fully expanded fascicles from sun-exposed, upper-crown branches (10–12 m high) of each of three trees in each of the six rings at approximately 2-h intervals from sunrise to sunset. Trees sampled were within 10 m of the center of the ring, where pCO2 is most homogeneous (Hendrey et al., 1999). Measurements were also made in the prototype FACE ring in September 1996 by the procedures described above for the other rings.

The recovery of Fv/Fm was monitored in situ as follows. In full sun between 12 and 2 pm, Fv′/Fm′ was measured, the branch was shaded (PPFD < 50 μmol m−2 s−1), and Fv/Fm was measured at intervals for 60 min. Three fascicles on one branch in one control and one elevated ring were measured.

Photosynthetic Gas Exchange

A was measured at ambient PPFD using a portable open gas-exchange system (CIRAS-1, PP Systems, Hitchin, UK) as described by Ellsworth (1999). As with fluorescence measurements, fascicles at the top of the canopy were selected and their natural orientation and inclination were retained during measurement. The pCO2 within the leaf chamber was maintained at the growth pCO2. Temperature and leaf-air vapor pressure differences within the leaf chamber were maintained near ambient levels. Fascicle surface area was calculated using the method of Johnson (1984). On each date the fluorescence was measured, leaf gas exchange was measured between 11 am and 3 pm, sampling one fascicle from one to three trees in each of the six rings. Measurements were made in parallel with the above fluorescence measurements on separate fascicles but from the same populations.

Light Response of CO2 Uptake and Fluorescence

To separate developmental differences and long-term effects due to elevated pCO2 from any change induced by exposure to high light during the day, measurements were also made on fascicles collected around dawn. Fascicles of the populations used in the diurnal studies described above were cut under water, transferred to a controlled environment, and maintained in low light until measured. Measurements were made within 2 h of collection. The responses of A, JPSII, φPSII, Fv/Fm′, and qP to PPFD were determined simultaneously on individual fascicles in April, August, and November 1997 and in February 1998. A leaf gas exchange system (LI 6400, LI-COR) incorporating a controlled environment cuvette modified to accept the fiber optics from a modulated fluorimeter (PAM 2000) was used.

Measurements were made at PPFD from 0 to 1,600 μmol m−2 s−1 provided by a quartz iodide source, and were made at the mean midday Tleaf and humidities observed in the diurnal measurements. Measurements in April, August, and November were made at Tleaf = 22.0°C ± 0.1°C, 26.0°C ± 0.1°C, and 18.0°C ± 0.2°C, respectively. In February 1998 the measurements were made at Tleaf = 19.0°C ± 0.2°C. In all months, measurements were made in both 21 and 1 kPa pO2 (Scott Specialty Gases, Durham, NC). At least two fascicles from all six rings were measured on each occasion. From the response of A to PPFD, φCO2 was calculated as (A + RL)/(PPFD × α), where RL is the rate of CO2 evolution after 2 to 3 min in the dark. The relationship of φPSII to φCO2 in 1 kPa pO2 was used to determine any effect of growth pCO2 on the magnitude of alternative sinks for electron flux (Genty et al., 1989; Edwards and Baker, 1993).

Statistical Analysis

Two-way ANOVA was used to test the effect of growth pCO2 and time of year on chlorophyll fluorescence and gas exchange parameters at light saturation both in situ and on the excised fascicles (SYSTAT Inc., Evanston, IL). To avoid pseudoreplication, means for each parameter were calculated for every ring and subsequently treated as the individual, giving a sample size of n = 3 per treatment for statistical analyses. For measurements made in the FACE-prototype experiment individual fascicles were the replicates. The effect of pCO2 treatment on the slope and intercept of the relationship between φPSII and φCO2 was examined by regression ANOVA. The derived chlorophyll fluorescence parameters φPSII, Fv/Fm′, Fv/Fm′, and qP, were arcsine-transformed prior to statistical analysis (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981).

RESULTS

Skies were clear throughout the measurement days. With the exception of February 1997, temperatures were typical of the season (Fig. 1, p–t). In February 1997 the maximum day temperature was high (19°C), however the previous night had been −5°C and the average daily minimum for the month was zero, with below-zero minimum temperatures on 20 d within the month. Minima were similar in February 1998, although the lower daily maximum illustrated for 1998 is more typical of this month.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

a to e, A at midday; f to j, diurnal variation in JPSII; k to o, ratio of elevated/current (E/C) pCO2 measurements of JPSII at light saturation; and p to t, Tair and PPFD for 5 sunny days in different seasons from February 1997 to February 1998. White bars and symbols are for trees growing at current ambient pCO2 and black bars and symbols are for trees growing at elevated pCO2. Symbols shown are the means ± 1 se.

Under the warm conditions of August 1997, when substantial growth was occurring, the total electron flux through PSII (JPSII), and therefore the proportion of absorbed light energy used in photochemisty, was strongly and significantly enhanced by elevated pCO2. This only applied to the period when photon flux was saturating, i.e. above 700 μmol m−2 s−1 (Fig. 1, h and m; Table I). At lower photon fluxes JPSII was unaffected by pCO2, which is consistent with the expected transition in limitation of photosynthesis from Rubisco to RubP regeneration rate (Fig. 1h).

Table I.

In situ measurements of photosynthesis

Parameter F-Statistic
Probability
pCO2 Time Interaction February 1997 April 1997 August 1997 November 1997 February 1998
JPSII 7.4* 89.8* 21.5* 0.03 0.04 <0.01 0.26 0.06
A 55.3* 22.4* 3.2* 0.02 0.01 <0.01 0.31 0.10
qP 3.8* 72.7* 25.5* 0.01 0.06 <0.01 0.23 0.01
Fv′/Fm 4.6* 164* 0.61
PPFD 0.1 41.2* 1.0

Summary of the two-way ANOVA to test for the effects of growth pCO2 (F1,20), time of year (F4,20), and their interaction (F4,20) on light-saturated JPSII, A, qP, Fv′/Fm′, and PPFD; * denotes significance at P > 0.05. When the interaction between growth pCO2 and time of year was significant (P > 0.05), the effect of pCO2 was tested for each sampling date using Tukey's pairwise comparison; bold text indicates significance at P < 0.1.

The increase in JPSII at light saturation corresponded to a highly significant 65% enhancement of A around noon of the same day (Fig. 1c; Table I). Similar enhancements in JPSII were observed in September 1996 in both the full experiment, 1 week after pCO2 elevation began, and in the parallel prototype experiment (Hendrey et al., 1999), in which the trees had been exposed to elevated pCO2 for the three preceding summers (Table II). A smaller but significant enhancement of JPSII and A was observed in April in the early part of the growing season (Fig. 1, b, g, and l; Table I). By sharp contrast, in February of both years there were significant decreases in JPSII under elevated pCO2, showing that less of the absorbed energy was being utilized by photochemistry (Fig. 1, f and j; Table I). Moreover, there was a progressive decrease in JPSII over the course of the day at elevated pCO2 relative to controls, which may indicate development of increased TPU limitation at elevated pCO2 (Fig. 1k). During February there was no growth, and freezing temperatures probably inhibited translocation. A slight increase in A due to elevated pCO2 was observed at midday in February 1997; the indicated increase in February 1998 was not significant (Fig. 1, a and e; Table I). Although enhancement of JPSII was indicated for November 1997, soon after the end of the growing season, this was not significant (Fig. 1i).

Table II.

Midday mean chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in September 1996

JPSII, Fv′/Fm′ and qP were measured on sun-exposed branches in two FACE experiments during September 1996: (a) The FACE prototype, which was a single elevated pCO2 ring and control that had been operated over three consecutive growing seasons prior to these measurements. (b) The adjacent full experiment of three replicate elevated and three replicate current pCO2 rings that had been operated for just 1 week prior to these measurements. Values are the means (se) for two fascicles measured on each of three trees in the prototype ring and a control ring; and means (se) for the three replicate elevated and control pCO2 rings in the full experiment. Two-way ANOVA tested the effect of pCO2 (F1,14), experiment (F1,14), and their interaction (F1,14) on each parameter. F values for the effect of pCO2 are shown, *indicates P < 0.05; n.s. indicates P > 0.05. No interaction was found for any of the parameters (F1,14 < 3.2; P > 0.05). E/C indicates the ratio of JPSII and qP measured at elevated pCO2 to that measured at the current ambient pCO2. JPSII is expressed in μmol m−2 s−1, Fv′/Fm′ and qP are dimensionless.

Parameter FACE Prototype
Full Experiment
F Statistic
Current Elevated Current Elevated
JPSII 227.0  (12.0) 297.0  (17.0) 170.3   (3.5)  241.9  (15.8) 19.9*
E/C of JPSII 1.31 1.42 
Fv′/Fm 0.73  (0.03) 0.67  (0.02) 0.65  (0.05) 0.72  (0.01) 0.03, n.s.
qP 0.47  (0.02) 0.67  (0.04) 0.43  (0.04) 0.56  (0.02) 22.8*
E/C of qP 1.43 1.30 

Variations in JPSII may be analyzed by examining the causes of the change in φPSII, which, assuming an equal distribution of absorbed energy between the two photosystems, is equal to the ratio of JPSII to twice the absorbed photon flux (Fig. 2, a–e). Variation in φPSII is the product of variation in qP and Fv/Fm′. Over the year, elevated pCO2 has little effect on Fv/Fm′, with variation in φPSII resulting from a change in qP (Fig. 2, f–o). This would be consistent with a limitation downstream of PSII, as would occur if the demand for NADPH in carbon metabolism changed. In February 1997 elevated pCO2 depressed qP relative to controls, with the converse effect in August (Fig. 2, f and h). Although elevated pCO2 produced no obvious effect on Fv/Fm′, the diurnal minimum Fv/Fm determined after 10 min of dark adaptation was significantly lower at elevated pCO2 in February (F1,8 = 21.5; P < 0.05), yet was unaffected in other months (Fig. 2, p–t).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Diurnal variation in φPSII (a–e), qP (f–j), Fv/Fm′ (k–o), and Fv/Fm (p–t) for elevated (•) and current (○) pCO2 measured on the same tissue and at the same times as the measurements illustrated in Figure 1.

There was no significant change in Fo between dawn and the point at which Fv/Fm was minimal, in February 1997 (F1,8 = 3.1; P < 0.05) and February 1998 (F1,8 = 0.3; P < 0.05) (data not shown). Recovery of Fv/Fm was slower at elevated pCO2 in February, giving a significant separation between pCO2 treatments after about 3 min of recovery. This was still clearly evident after 60 min of dark adaptation (Fig. 3). Had there been any systematic difference in PPFD between the FACE and control samples, this could have caused differences in fluorescence parameters. However, the PPFD was almost identical between CO2 treatments (F1,20 = 0.1; P = 0.76; Table I).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effect of elevated pCO2 on the recovery of Fv/Fm after transfer to shade in the early afternoon. Days shown are in: February 1997 (a), April 1997 (b), August 1997 (c), and February 1998 (d). Points shown are the means of three measurements made on sun-exposed branches sampled from the same population measured in Figures 1 and 2. A negative exponential curve was fitted to the points illustrated. Symbols are as in Figure 1.

Samples of fascicles were excised before dawn and measured later in a controlled-environment cuvette. This revealed potential photosynthesis in the absence of photoinhibition, water stress, or the TPU limitation that might develop over a diurnal course. Significant enhancement of A and JPSII in the elevated pCO2 treatment was seen in these excised fascicles regardless of the time of year (Table III). These increases showed that both the lack of enhancement of A and the inhibition of JPSII observed in the same tissues in situ was a temporary property developed on exposure to light during the day, and was not the result of long-term acclimation to elevated pCO2. Enhancement of JPSII in the excised fascicles again corresponded to a significant enhancement of qP but not Fv/Fm′ (Table III). In all seasons, light saturation of A occurred at photon flux densities of about 700 μmol m−2 s−1 (data not shown). Regression of φPSII against φCO2 showed no significant effect of elevated pCO2 on the ratio of the rates of whole-chain electron transport through PSII to CO2 assimilation in the absence of photorespiration (Fig. 4). There was no significant effect of elevated pCO2 on either the slope or the intercept of this relationship in November 1997 (Fig. 4), April 1997 (data not shown), or February 1998 (data not shown). On no occasion was the intercept significantly greater than zero.

Table III.

Light-saturated photosynthetic characteristics

Parameter April
August
November
February
pCO2 Time Interaction
36 Pa 55 Pa 36 Pa 55 Pa 36 Pa 55 Pa 36 Pa 55 Pa
Asat 4.94 7.52 4.8 8.97 4.18 7.21 3.61 5.66 57.0  5.8 0.3
(0.2) (0.6) 0.6 0.5 (0.5) (0.9) (0.24) (0.6) *** *
JPSII 68.9 126 70 109 36.1 63.1 25.4 59.1 32.1 16.1 0.5
(1.5) (14.8) 6.5 5.7 (9.6) (14.8) (4.8) (12.1) *** ***
φPSII 0.12 0.21 0.10 0.16 0.06 0.10 0.04 0.09 27.5 46.2 0.9
(0.01) (0.02) 0.01 0.01 (0.01) (0.02) (0.01) (0.02) *** ***
qP 0.26 0.42 0.21 0.34 0.14 0.24 0.12 0.25 21.6 20.4 0.9
(0.03) (0.04) 0.01 0.04 (0.04) (0.05) (0.03) (0.05) *** ***
Fv′/Fm 0.44 0.51 0.48 0.49 0.40 0.41 0.34 0.37  4.9 97.2 0.5
(0.01) (0.02) 0.01 0.04 (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) ***

Mean (se) Asat, JPSII, φPSII, qP, and Fv′/Fm′ at a PPFD of 1,600 μmol m−2 s−1 for April, August and November 1997 and February 1998 of the three replicate rings for each pCO2 treatments. Fascicles were excised under water around dawn and maintained in low light until measured in a controlled-environment gas exchange cuvette. Measurements were made at a pCO2 of 36 Pa for the controls and at 55 Pa for the elevated CO2 grown fascicles. The effects of pCO2 (F1,16), time of year (F3,16), and their interaction (F3,16) were tested for significance using two way ANOVA. *** denotes P < 0.001; * denotes P < 0.05. Asat and JPSII, are expressed in μmol m−2 s−1. φPSII, qP, and Fv′/Fm′ are dimensionless.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Relationship of φPSII to φCO2 determined simultaneously on fascicles from each elevated and each control pCO2 ring in November 1997. The line indicates the least-square best fit to the data for each pCO2 treatment. White symbols and the dashed line are for trees growing at current ambient pCO2 and black symbols and the solid line are for trees growing at elevated pCO2. The intercept of each regression was not significantly different from zero (F1,46 = 1.7; P < 0.05), and no significant effect of pCO2 was found on the relationship between φPSII and φCO2 (F1,46 = 0.1; P < 0.05).  

DISCUSSION

Our results agree with our initial hypothesis that the effects of elevated pCO2 on photochemistry will differ in a predictable manner with the time of year. In August and April, periods of significant growth for these trees, JPSII was increased at elevated pCO2 when light was saturating (Fig. 1, l and m). Conversely, in February of both years, elevated pCO2 depressed JPSII at light saturation (Fig. 1, k and o). These results agree with the theoretical prediction that the amount of active Rubisco will limit light-saturated photosynthesis during the major periods of photosynthate demand and that TPU will limit it during the winter, when growth has ceased and translocation may be limited by the low mean temperature. In February of both years the daily minima were at or below 0°C and were therefore likely to restrict translocation. The suggestion that the amount of active Rubisco is limiting during August and April is consistent with the loss of the pCO2-dependent increase in JPSII, as light decreases over the diurnal course (Fig. 1, g and h).

As PPFD drops below the saturating level, a transition from limitation of Rubisco to RubP regeneration would be expected, eliminating any effect on JPSII. Responses of A to ci determined for these needles also indicated that in the absence of TPU limitation the amount of active Rubisco rather than the capacity for RubP regeneration is the major limitation to light-saturated photosynthesis (data not shown) (Myers et al., 1999). Fascicles excised under water around dawn during February and transferred to an illuminated, controlled-environment cuvette showed stimulation of both A and JPSII in elevated pCO2 (Table III). This suggests that the fascicles grown in elevated pCO2 had the capacity to respond to elevated pCO2 with increased A and JPSII, but that this was not realized in the in situ diurnal measurements. One explanation of this result would be that sugar phosphates could accumulate more rapidly in the early part of the day, leading to TPU limitation in the elevated pCO2 treatment. This explanation is consistent with the progressive decline in the ratio of JPSII at elevated to ambient pCO2 observed in February 1997 (Fig. 1k). In the absence of photosynthetic acclimation and within the context of the three potential limitations to light-saturated photosynthesis of the model of Farquhar et al. (1980) as modified by Sharkey (1985), these changes could only be explained by TPU limitation.

An acclimatory loss of Rubisco or capacity for RubP regeneration would also cause a decrease in JPSII. However, parallel studies of the responses of CO2 uptake to intercellular CO2 concentration (A/Ci) gave no evidence in vivo of any loss of Rubisco activity or capacity for RubP regeneration in any season (Ellsworth, 1999; Myers et al., 1999). Growth at elevated pCO2 could also affect JPSII if it decreases alternative sinks for electrons, in particular Mehler reactions or photosynthetic nitrogen metabolism. For example, Polle et al. (1993, 1997) showed a decrease in the activity of enzymes associated with the metabolism of active oxygen species under elevated pCO2. A significant alternative sink would be apparent as a change in the relationship between the efficiencies of electron transport and CO2 uptake. However, there was no effect of pCO2 on this relationship when measured in the absence of photorespiration (Fig. 4), as has been observed previously (Epron et al., 1994; Habash et al., 1995; Bartak et al., 1996).

Although Fv/Fm′ declined with increasing photon flux, it was unaffected by elevated pCO2 despite significant effects on JPSII. Increased JPSII in the summer and decreased JPSII in the winter were paralleled by changes in qP (Fig. 2). This shows that variations in electron flux due to growth in elevated pCO2 at different times of the year result from variations in the proportion of open PSII reaction centers rather than from any effect on the efficiency with which absorbed quanta are transferred to the reaction center. This is consistent with altered rates of electron transport at light saturation resulting from variations in the capacity of processes downstream of PSII to accept electrons. These results also suggest that Fv/Fm′ is not simply driven by electron flux, since significant changes in JPSII caused by elevated pCO2 do not appear to affect the efficiency of energy transfer to the reaction center. Habash et al. (1995) found that increased electron transport in young wheat plants growing at elevated pCO2 in a controlled environment corresponded to increased qP without an effect on Fv/Fm′.

Photoinhibition has been defined as a reversible decrease in the efficiency of excitation energy transfer to PSII reaction centers. This serves to protect the reaction centers from photoinactivation and damage when the rate of excitation of PSII is in excess of the rate at which the reaction centers can use excitation energy for photochemistry (Osmond, 1994). The cost of this protection is that when a leaf is in low light after photoinhibition, the efficiency of photosynthesis remains low for many minutes, and sometimes hours, with the loss of potential carbon fixation (Long et al., 1994). We anticipated that a decrease in PSII photochemistry in the winter due to elevated pCO2 would increase photoinhibition and decrease the maximum potential for carbon fixation. Elevated pCO2 produced significant reductions in Fv/Fm in February of both years, however, no effect was observed on Fv/Fm′. This was assumed to result from an increase in light-induced quenching processes being considerably greater than the quenching remaining in the dark-adapted fascicles used for the Fv/Fm measurements (Fig. 2). Since there were no significant effects of elevated pCO2 on Fo, the reduced Fv/Fm was almost certainly associated with zeaxanthin quenching. A slow recovery of Fv/Fm (requiring more than 10 h) in maize leaves growing at chilling temperature was shown previously to be associated with the conversion of zeaxanthin to violaxanthin (Fryer et al., 1995). Therefore, the slower recovery of Fv/Fm in plants grown at elevated pCO2 is indicative of the imposition of an additional stress during the winter, which is not experienced by the control plants. Other evidence that overwintering leaves may be subjected to increased stress at elevated pCO2 is provided by Lutze et al. (1998) who showed increased frost damage to Eucalyptus pauciflora seedling leaves at elevated pCO2.

In conclusion, this study has shown that for mature trees, elevated pCO2 can cause both decreases and increases in the use of absorbed light energy in photochemistry, which is consistent with seasonal changes in limitations on photosynthetic carbon metabolism. In the summer, elevated pCO2 results in significantly more of the absorbed light being used in photochemistry and a decreased potential for photoinhibition, although no significant effect of pCO2 on photoinhibition was observed. Utilization of absorbed energy within the photosynthetic apparatus appears to be strongly inhibited under elevated pCO2 during the winter period, and this correlates with a slower recovery from photoinhibition compared with ambient trees. These results suggest that elevated pCO2 may add a further stress to overwintering evergreen vegetation in temperate regions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all of the staff at the FACTS-1 site. Particular thanks go to Andrew Palmiotti, Matthew Giles, and Elke Naumburg for their help and advice.

Abbreviations:

A

net rate of CO2 uptake per unit leaf area (μmol m−2 s−1)

α

leaf absorptance between 400–700 nm

FACE

free-air CO2 enrichment

Fo

Fm, minimum and maximum dark-adapted fluorescence yield, respectively

Fo

Fm′, Fs, minimum, maximum, and steady-state light-adapted fluorescence yield, respectively

Fv/Fm

quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry in the dark-adapted stateFv/Fm, probability of an absorbed photon reaching an open PSII reaction center

JPSII

estimated rate of linear electron flow through PSII (μmol m−2 s−1)

pCO2

partial pressure of CO2 (Pa)

φCO2

quantum efficiency of CO2 fixation corrected for leaf absorption

φPSII

quantum efficiency of linear electron transport through PSII

qP

photochemical quenching coefficient

RL

estimate of the rate of respiratory CO2 efflux in the light (μmol m−2 s−1)

Tleaf

leaf temperature (°C)

TPU

triose phosphate utilization

vc

velocity of carboxylation

vo

velocity of oxygenation

Footnotes

1

G.J.H. was supported by a studentship from the Natural Environment Research Council (United Kingdom). This research is part of the Forest-Atmosphere Carbon Transfer and Storage (FACTS-1) project at Duke Forest. The FACTS-1 project is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Health and Environmental Research, under DOE contract nos. DE–ACO2–76CH00016 at Brookhaven National Laboratory and DE–FG05–95ER62083 at Duke University.

LITERATURE  CITED

  1. Bartak M, Nijs I, Impens I. The effect of long-term exposure of Lolium perenne L. plants to elevated CO2 and/or elevated air temperature on quantum yield of photosystem 2 and net photosynthesis. Photosynthetica. 1996;32:549–562. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryant J, Taylor G, Frehner M. Photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2 is modified by source:sink balance in three component species of chalk grassland swards grown in a free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) experiment. Plant Cell Environ. 1998;21:159–168. [Google Scholar]
  3. Curtis P. A meta-analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ. 1996;19:127–137. [Google Scholar]
  4. Drake B, Gonzalez-Meler M, Long SP. More efficient plants: a consequence of rising atmospheric CO2. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1997;48:609–639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwards GE, Baker NR. Can CO2 assimilation in leaves be predicted accurately from chlorophyll fluorescence analysis? Photosynth Res. 1993;37:89–102. doi: 10.1007/BF02187468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ellsworth DS. CO2 enrichment in a maturing pine forest: are CO2 exchange and water status in the canopy affected? Plant Cell Environ. 1999;22:461–472. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ellsworth DS, Oren R, Huang C, Phillips N, Hendrey GR. Leaf and canopy responses to elevated CO2 in a pine forest under free air CO2 enrichment. Oecologia. 1995;104:139–146. doi: 10.1007/BF00328578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Epron D, Dreyer E, Picon C, Guehl JM. The relationship between CO2 dependent O2 evolution and photosystem II activity in oak (Quercus petrea) trees grown in the field and in seedlings grown in ambient or elevated CO2. Tree Physiol. 1994;14:725–733. doi: 10.1093/treephys/14.7-8-9.725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta. 1980;149:78–90. doi: 10.1007/BF00386231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fryer MJ, Oxborough K, Martin B, Ort DR, Baker NR. Factors associated with depression of photosynthetic quantum efficiency in maize at low growth temperature. Plant Physiol. 1995;108:761–767. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.2.761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Genty B, Briantais JM, Baker NR. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989;990:87–92. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ghashghaie J, Cornic G. Effect of temperature on partitioning of photosynthetic electron flow between CO2 assimilation and O2 reduction and on the CO2/O2 specificity of Rubisco. J Plant Physiol. 1994;143:643–650. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gunderson CA, Wullschleger SD. Photosynthetic acclimation in trees to rising atmospheric CO2: a broader perspective. Photosynth Res. 1994;39:369–388. doi: 10.1007/BF00014592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Habash D, Paul M, Parry MAJ, Keys AJ, Lawlor DW. Increased capacity for photosynthesis in wheat grown at elevated CO2: the relationship between electron transport and carbon metabolism. Planta. 1995;197:482–489. [Google Scholar]
  15. Harley PC, Thomas RB, Reynolds JF, Strain BR. Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ. 1992;15:271–282. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hendrey GR, Ellsworth DS, Lewin KF, Nagy J. A free-air enrichment system for exposing tall forest vegetation to elevated atmospheric CO2. Global Change Biol. 1999;5:293–310. [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson JD. A rapid technique for estimating total surface area of pine needles. For Sci. 1984;30:913–921. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jones M, Clifton Brown J, Raschi A, Miglietta F. The effects on Arbutus unedo L. of long term exposure to elevated CO2. Global Change Biol. 1995;1:295–302. [Google Scholar]
  19. Krall J, Edwards GE. Relationship between photosystem II activity and CO2 fixation in leaves. Physiol Plant. 1992;86:180–187. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee HS, Jarvis PJ. Trees differ from crops and from each other in their responses to increases in CO2 concentration. J Biogeogr. 1995;22:323–330. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lewin KF, Hendrey GR, Nagy J, LaMorte RL. Design and application of a free-air carbon dioxide enrichment facility. Agric For Meterol. 1994;70:15–29. [Google Scholar]
  22. Long SP, Humphries S, Falkowski PG. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in nature. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1994;45:633–662. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lutze JL, Roden JS, Holly CJ, Wolfe J, Egerton JJG, Ball MC. Elevated atmospheric [CO2] promotes frost damage in evergreen tree seedlings. Plant Cell Environ. 1998;21:631–635. [Google Scholar]
  24. McLeod AR, Long SP. Free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) in global change research: a review. Adv Ecol Res. 1999;28:1–56. [Google Scholar]
  25. Myers DA, Thomas RB, DeLucia EH. Photosynthetic capacity of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) trees during the first year of carbon dioxide enrichment in a forest ecosystem. Plant Cell Environ. 1999;22:473–482. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nogues S, Allen DJ, Morison JIL, Baker NR. Ultraviolet-B radiation effects on water relations, leaf development, and photosynthesis in droughted pea plants. Plant Physiol. 1998;117:173–181. doi: 10.1104/pp.117.1.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Oechel WC, Cowles S, Grulke N, Hastings SJ, Lawrence B. Transient nature of CO2 fertilisation in Arctic tundra. Nature. 1994;371:500–503. [Google Scholar]
  28. Osmond CB (1994) What is photoinhibition? Some insights from comparisons of shade and sun plants. In NR Baker, JR Bowyer, eds, Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis from Molecular Mechanisms to the Field. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, pp 1–24
  29. Pammenter NW, Loreto F, Sharkey TD. End product feedback effects on photosynthetic electron transport. Photosynth Res. 1993;35:5–14. doi: 10.1007/BF02185407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Polle A, Eiblmeier M, Sheppard L, Murray M. Responses of antioxidative enzymes to elevated CO2 in leaves of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings grown under a range of nutrient regimes. Plant Cell Environ. 1997;20:1317–1321. [Google Scholar]
  31. Polle A, Pfirrmann T, Chakrabarti S, Rennenberg H. The effects of enhanced ozone and enhanced carbon dioxide concentrations on biomass, pigments and antioxidative enzymes in spruce needles (Picea abies L.) Plant Cell Environ. 1993;16:311–316. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rackham O, Wilson J. Integrating sphere. In: Wadsworth RM, editor. The Measurement of Environmental Factors in Terrestrial Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1968. pp. 259–263. [Google Scholar]
  33. Roden J, Ball M. Growth and photosynthesis of two eucalypt species during high temperature stress under ambient and elevated [CO2] Global Change Biol. 1996;2:115–128. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rogers A, Fischer BU, Bryant J, Frehner M, Blum H, Raines CA, Long SP. Acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2 under low-nitrogen nutrition is affected by the capacity for assimilate utilization: perennial ryegrass under free-air CO2 enrichment. Plant Physiol. 1998;118:683–689. doi: 10.1104/pp.118.2.683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Saxe H, Ellsworth DS, Heath J. Tree and forest functioning in an enriched CO2 atmosphere. New Phytol. 1998;139:395–436. [Google Scholar]
  36. Scarascia-Mugnozza G, De Angelis P, Matteucci G, Valentini R. Long term exposure to elevated [CO2] in a natural Quercus ilex L. community: net photosynthesis and photochemical efficiency of PSII at different levels of water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 1996;19:643–654. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sharkey TD. O2-insensitive photosynthesis in C3 plants: its occurrence and a possible explanation. Plant Physiol. 1985;78:71–75. doi: 10.1104/pp.78.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Socias PN, Medrano H, Sharkey TD. Feedback limitation of photosynthesis of Phaeolus vulgaris L. grown in elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ. 1993;16:81–86. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, Ed 2. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco
  40. Valentini R, Epron D, De Angelis P, Matteucci G, Dreyer E. In situ estimation of net CO2 assimilation, photosynthetic electron flow and photorespiration in Turkey oak (Q. cerris L.) leaves: diurnal cycles under different levels of water supply. Plant Cell Environ. 1995;18:631–640. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES