Aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis following rapid weight loss and/or malnutrition

Abstract

While non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is a slowly progressive disease, patients may rarely present in acute liver failure. We describe six patients who developed severe hepatic dysfunction following rapid weight loss or malnutrition. Rapid weight loss (18 to 91 kg) occurred after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in four patients and starvation-like dieting or hypoalbuminemia was noted in two patients. Four patients either died or received an urgent liver transplant. Pathologic findings were characterized by advanced alcoholic steatohepatitis-like features, including extensive/circumferential centrizonal pericellular fibrosis, central scar with perivenular sclerosis/veno-occlusion with superimposed hepatocellular dropout, abundant/prominent hepatocellular balloons, and numerous Mallory–Denk bodies, but there was no history of excess alcohol consumption. This study characterizes clinicopathologic features of aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis following rapid weight loss or malnutrition, which should be included in the differential diagnosis with alcohol when a patient is considered for liver transplantation. The mechanism of liver injury in aggressive steatohepatitis is unknown, but rapid fat mobilization in obese patients may potentially cause oxidative stress to the liver and further study is needed to determine if there is a genetic predisposition to this form of injury and if antioxidants may protect the liver during rapid weight loss/malnutrition.

The term ‘non-alcoholic steatohepatitis’ was first proposed by Ludwig et al.¹ in 1980 to denote steatohepatitis in absence of alcohol abuse. Well-established risk factors for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis include obesity, metabolic syndrome, hyperlipidemia, and type 2 diabetes.^2,3 Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis prevalence is increasing around the world, especially in the United States,⁴ and is expected to be the most common etiology of cirrhosis (and the most common indication for liver transplantation) in coming years.⁵ A multi-hit model has been proposed to explain the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.³ Proposed mechanisms of disease include proinflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress, and endoplasmic reticulum stress, as well as an interplay between gut microbiome, diet, and genetic influences.³ Diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis requires a liver biopsy with steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocellular ballooning (with or without characteristic pericellular fibrosis).^6,7 Other common histologic findings in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis include Mallory–Denk bodies, acidophil bodies, glycogenosis, and glycogenated nuclei. Alcoholic steatohepatitis often manifests with more intense portal and lobular inflammation with neutrophil satellitosis, cholestasis, central vein obliteration, more prominent ballooned hepatocytes, and abundant Mallory–Denk bodies.⁶

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis typically progresses slowly and may not be clinically apparent.² Up to 20% of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis progress to cirrhosis over a 15-year time period.⁸ Hepatic decompensation in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is rare and has been associated with drug use, rapid weight loss/malnutrition due to fasting, and intestinal resection or bariatric surgery.^9–16 Rapid weight loss/malnutrition has been reported to induce hepatic inflammation and exacerbate steatohepatitis with progression to liver failure within a relatively short timeframe.^17,18 However, liver injury due to rapid weight loss/malnutrition remains poorly understood and pathologic features have not been well-characterized. In this study, we describe six patients with rapid weight loss/malnutrition who developed severe hepatic dysfunction and histologic findings suggestive of an aggressive form of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

Materials and methods

Case Selection

To identify cases of potential aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, and following approval by the Committee on Human Research, the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco (San Francisco, CA, USA) files were searched from 2000 to 2015 for ‘steatohepatitis.’ All cases suggestive of rapid progression/decompensation were selected for further review. Cases were excluded if there was any history of alcohol or drug abuse. We also received one case from the University of Washington Department of Pathology (Seattle, WA, USA). Demographic information is provided in Table 1.

Table 1.

Patient characteristics and laboratory data on admission

	Patient 1	Patient 2	Patient 3	Patient 4	Patient 5	Patient 6
Age	33	37	40	37	37	46
Gender	F	F	F	F	F	F
Ethnicity	Hispanic	Caucasian	Hispanic	Caucasian	Caucasian	Caucasian
Previous history	Morbid obesity	Morbid obesity	Morbid obesity, anemia and pancytopenia	Morbid obesity	Morbid obesity	Previous history of fatty liver and irregular menses
Clinical setting	Weight loss due to long-limb Roux-en-Y bypass	Weight loss due to Roux-en-Y bypass	Weight loss due to low carbohydrate and high protein diet	Weight loss due to Roux-en-Y bypass	Weight loss due to Roux-en-Y bypass	1-week history of abdominal pain and distention
Alcohol	None	None	Occasionally	Occasionally	None	None
Medications	None	Omeprazole 91 kg over 3 years	Omeprazole, vitamin K 23 kg over 1 year	Benadryl	None	None
Weight loss/time	18 kg over 5 months			45 kg over 8 months	40 kg over 7 years	Not available
BMI changes	45.3 to 38.4	59.4 to 26.5	39.7 to 30.2	55.1 to 36.5	46 to 32	Current BMI: 24.5
Symptoms/signs	Icteric skin, nausea, vomiting, jaundice and encephalopathy	Jaundiced, asterixis, ascites, prominent hepatomegaly	Jaundiced, ascites and encephalopathy	Asterixis, icteric skin, prominent hepatomegaly, lower extremity edema, Right upper quadrant abdominal pain	Hepatomegaly, severe malnutrition with peripheral neuropathy and thiamine deficiency, portal hypertension with varices	Hepatomegaly
Initial symptoms prior to admission	19 days	3 months	2 months	Not available	Not available	1 week
Liver tests	AST = 80 U/l ALT = 143 U/l AP = 189 U/l Total bilirubin = 11.7 mg/dl	AST = 105 U/l ALT = 39 U/l AP =124 U/l Total bilirubin = 27.6 mg/dl	AST = 115 U/l ALT = 25 U/l AP = 109 U/l Total bilirubin = 35.2 mg/dl	AST = 110 U/l ALT = 25 U/l AP = 98 U/l Total bilirubin = 11 mg/dl	Transaminases: elevated Bilirubin: within normal limits	AST = 106 U/l ALT = 22 U/l AP: within normal limit Total bilirubin = 2.8 mg/dl
Synthetic function	Albumin = 2.4 g/dl Evidence of coagulopathy	Albumin= 1.8 g/dl INR= 2.4	Albumin = 2.1 g/dl INR = 2.1	Albumin = 1.3 g/dl INR = 1.4	Evidence of coagulopathy	Albumin = 2.3 g/dl
Viral and autoimmune serologies	HAV IgM (−) HBsAg(−) HBsAb(−) HCV IgM (−) CMV Ab (+) ANA < 40	HAV IgM (−) HBsAg(−) HBsAb(−) HBc IgM (−) HCV IgM (−) HIV Ab (−) CMV Ab (+) EBNA Ab (+) EBV IgM (+) ANA < 40 Anti-smooth muscle (−) LKM Ab (−)	HAV IgG (+) HAV IgM (−) HBsAg(−) HBcAb(−) HBsAb (+) HBc IgM (−) HCV Ab (−) HIV Ab (−) CMV Ab (+) EBNA Ab (+) EBV IgM (−) ANA < 40 AMA (−)	HAV IgG (−) HAV IgM (−) HBsAg(−) HBcAb (−) HBc IgM (−) HCV Ab (−) HIV Ab (−) CMV Ab (−) EBNA Ab (−) EBV IgM (−) AMA (−)	Not available	HAV, HBV, HCV (−) IgG =1700, mildly elevated ANA(−) LKM (−)
Other labs	Ceruloplasmin: within normal limits Ferritin = 305 μg/l α-1-antitrypsin: within normal limits	Ceruloplasmin: within normal limits α-1-antitrypsin: within normal limits	Ceruloplasmin: within normal limits α-1-antitrypsin: within normal limits	Ceruloplasmin: within normal limits Ferritin = 735 pg/l		Ceruloplasmin: within normal limits α-1-antitrypsin: within normal limits
Outcome	Death	Liver transplantation	Liver transplantation	Death	Improved after medical treatment	Not available

Abbreviations: Albumin (normal adult: 3.5–4.8 g/dl); ALT, alanine aminotransferase (normal adult female: 11–50 U/l); AMA, anti-mitochondrial antibody; ceruloplasmin (normal: 19–68 mg/dl); ANA, antinuclear antibody (normal: negative titer < 40); α-1-antitrypsin (normal: 79–207 mg/dl); AP, alkaline phosphatase (normal: adult female: 31–95 U/l); AST, aspartate aminotransferase (normal adult: 17–42 U/l); total bilirubin (normal: 0.2–1.3 mg/dl); BMI, body mass index; CMV, cytomegalovirus; EBNA, Epstein–Barr Virus nuclear antigen; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; ferritin (normal females age 30–39: 12–160 μg/l); HAV, hepatitis A virus; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; HBsAb, hepatitis B surface antibody; HBc, hepatitis B core; HCV, hepatitis C; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; INR, international normalized ratio (normal: 0.9–1.3); LKM Ab, liver kidney microsomal antibody.

All cases were evaluated by JHT, LDF, and RMG to document the following pathologic features: centrizonal scarring, perivenular sclerosis, centrizonal arteries,¹⁹ pericellular fibrosis, Mallory–Denk bodies, hepatocellular ballooning, ductular reaction, and cholestasis. Severe centrizonal scarring was defined as broad central-based fibrosis with extensive and circumferential pericellular fibrosis involving a majority of central zones. Trichrome and elastic stains (orcein stain or Elastic Van Gieson stain) were used to assess fibrosis and subacute hepatocellular dropout.^20,21

Results

Demographics and Clinical History

All patients were female with a median age of 39 years (range 33–46 years; Table 1) and had a history of rapid weight loss or malnutrition. There was no history of prior liver disease. Patient 2 had detectable Epstein–Barr virus IgM, but clinical and histologic findings did not support acute Epstein–Barr virus hepatitis as a cause of liver failure. Five patients were morbidly obese; three underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, one received long-limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and one followed a low carbohydrate/high protein diet for weight loss. There was no history of alcohol abuse or diet pill/supplement use. An intraoperative liver biopsy from Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was available in patient 1, which showed only moderate steatosis and early centrizonal pericellular fibrosis. The only non-obese patient in our study had hypoalbuminemia, suggestive of malnutrition, but no further history was available.

Clinical Presentation and Outcome

All patients presented with acute or subacute hepatic dysfunction, ranging from severe jaundice to asterixis, prominent hepatomegaly, and encephalopathy (with symptoms reported from 1 to 12 weeks prior to admission). There were two deaths and two patients received a liver transplant for severe liver failure soon after admission. The liver condition in one patient improved after medical management and one follow-up biopsy was taken three years later. Another patient had no available follow-up information.

Pathologic Findings

Pathologic findings are summarized in Table 2. Specimens included two explants (patients 2 and 3), two autopsies (patients 1 and 4), and two needle biopsies (patients 5 and 6). Massive hepatomegaly with fatty change was found in patients 1 and 4, which weighed 6680 and 5600g, respectively. The other two liver explants, in patients 2 and 3, showed micronodular cirrhosis and weighed 1825 and 1491g, respectively.

Table 2.

Aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis histologic findings

	Patient 1	Patient 2	Patient 3	Patient 4	Patient 5	Patient 6
Specimen	Autopsy	Explant	Explant	Autopsy	Needle biopsy	Needle biopsy
Gross findings	Massive hepatomegaly with focal infarcts (6680 g)	Micronodular cirrhosis (1825 g)	Early micronodular cirrhosis (1491 g)	Massive hepatomegaly with severe fatty change (5600 g)	Not available	Not available
Fibrosis stagea	Stage 3	Stage 4	Stage 4	Stage 3	Stage 3–4	Stage 3
Total macrovesicular steatosis (large and small droplet; %)	80%	10%	40%	40%	40%	80%
Severe centrizonal scarring	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Location of steatosis	Panacinar	Azonal	Panacinar	Azonal	Panacinar	Panacinar
Ballooned hepatocytes	Prominent	Prominent	Prominent	Prominent	Prominent	Prominent
Mallory–Denk bodies	Many	Many	Many	Many	Many	Many
Ductular reaction	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
Cholestasis	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No
Perivenular sclerosis/occlusion	No/No	Yes/Yes	Yes/Yes	Yes/No	Yes/Yes	Yes/Yes
Centrizonal arteries	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Trichrome staining pattern	Bridging fibrosis	Two-tone staining pattern	Two-tone staining pattern	Bridging fibrosis	Two-tone staining pattern	Two-tone staining pattern
Elastic stain results (Elastic can Gieson and/or orcein stains)	Not available	Lack of elastic fibers in centrizonal scars	Lack of elastic fibers in centrizonal scars	Not available	Lack of elastic fibers in centrizonal scars	Not available

^aAccording to the Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network staging methodology.²²

All histologic sections showed evidence of steatohepatitis, which was characterized by severe central-based fibrous scars (Figure 1a and b), prominent hepatocellular ballooning, and abundant dense Mallory–Denk bodies (Figure 1c). There were apoptotic hepatocytes in lobular parenchyma and a prominent neutrophil infiltrate around ballooned hepatocytes in all cases. Centrizonal arteries were present to a variable extent in five patients (Figure 1d). There was focal ductular reaction, mostly in a periportal distribution, in five patients, while hepatocanalicular cholestasis was only identified in three patients (Figure 1e). Perivenular sclerosis was observed in five patients and was characterized by fibrous wall thickening, intimal fibrosis, or total venous sclerosis with luminal obliteration. (Figure 1f).

Figure 1.

Pathologic features of aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in patient 2. (a) and (b) Examples of severe centrizonal scarring with pericellular fibrosis. Asterisks indicate portal tracts. (c) Prominent ballooned hepatocytes with Mallory–Denk bodies. (d) Centrizonal arteries (arrowheads) in fibrous central zones. (e) Ductular reaction and cholestasis. (f) Perivenular sclerosis with central vein occlusion. (a–f: H&E stain; original magnification: (a): × 40; (b): × 100; (c–f): × 200). H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.

Trichrome stain was used to estimate extent of centrizonal scarring (Figure 2a) and perivenular sclerosis (Figure 2b). Most central zones showed severe fibrosis and were involved by broad fibrous scars with extensive and circumferential pericellular fibrosis throughout the centrizonal region (Zone 3), which also extended into Zone 2 (midzonal) and focally to the periportal region (Zone 1), with associated bridging fibrosis (ie, central-central bridge formation). Centrizonal two-tone trichrome staining intensity was evident in four patients (Figure 2c) with dense aggregates of thick collagen bundles in darker staining areas and, at most, thin collagen fibers dispersed loosely in lighter staining areas, which suggested subacute injury. Elastic stains were performed on biopsies from three patients and demonstrated a lack of well-defined elastic fibers in pale staining areas, which confirmed our impression of subacute dropout rather than established fibrosis (Figure 2d).

Figure 2.

Additional examples of fibrosis in aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. (a) Broad dense centrizonal fibrosis, H&E stain. (b) Perivenular sclerosis and intimal thickening. Centrizonal arteries are also present to the left of the vein, trichrome stain. (c) Subacute changes with two-tone trichrome staining; dense, thick collagen bundles stain dark blue (asterisks), while regions with subacute dropout stain pale blue (arrows), trichrome stain. (d) Elastic fiber deposition in early fibrosis (arrows—lack of elastic fiber deposition in regions of necrosis; asterisks—elastic fiber deposition in early fibrosis), orcein stain. (Original magnification: (a): × 100; B: × 200; (c, d): × 40). H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.

Fibrosis was staged (summarized in Table 2) using Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network methodology.²² In patient 5, there was severe centrizonal scarring (as well as pale staining areas on trichrome stain suggestive of subacute dropout), sufficient for classification as at least bridging fibrosis (Figure 3a and b), which was overall considered stage 3–4 based on degree of pericellular fibrosis (Figure 3c). A follow-up biopsy was available three years after clinical resolution of liver failure, which demonstrated significant reduction in fibrosis with only few thin, bridging, collagenous bands around vaguely nodular hepatic lobules (Figure 3d), to suggest remodeling of prior fibrosis. Notably, no steatosis, ballooned hepatocytes, or Mallory–Denk bodies were seen in this biopsy.

Figure 3.

Histologic resolution/regression in patient 5. (a) Initial presenting biopsy at the time of liver failure with severe centrizonal scarring with central vein occlusion (asterisk), H&E stain. (b) Initial biopsy with many ballooned hepatocytes and Mallory–Denk bodies, H&E stain. (c) Initial biopsy with two-tone trichrome staining, highlighting centrizonal scar and obliterated vein (asterisk), trichrome stain. (d) Follow-up biopsy, three years after clinical resolution, without steatosis or ballooned hepatocytes. There are thin fibrous septa stretching from the central zones with mild/moderate portal and lobular inflammation, H&E stain. (Original magnification: (a): × 100; (b): × 200; (c, d): × 100). H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.

Discussion

In this study, we describe a series of patients with an aggressive form of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis related to rapid weight loss/malnutrition, who had no significant alcohol exposure, and who developed severe liver dysfunction that usually resulted in liver transplantation or death. Liver biopsy demonstrated a characteristic combination of severe centrizonal scaring, abundant hepatocellular ballooning, and numerous Mallory–Denk bodies. Extensive pericellular fibrosis was the most striking finding and was well beyond what is typically seen in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Ductular reaction and cholestasis were also particularly prominent in three patients with elevated bilirubin. Aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis shares similar histologic features with alcoholic steatohepatitis, namely abundant Mallory–Denk bodies, prominent neutrophil infiltrate around ballooned hepatocytes, central vein obliteration, pericellular fibrosis, and cholestasis.^6,7 The finding of subacute injury, which can be best identified on a well-controlled trichrome stain (though occasionally an elastic stain is needed for confirmation of these findings, as elastic fiber deposition supports early fibrosis^20,21), further supports consideration of a rapidly progressive or acute/subacute process. Four of six patients had an increased aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio (42:1), which has been associated with alcoholic steatohepatitis. Although it is not possible to absolutely exclude concealment of significant alcohol consumption, increased aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase ratio is not entirely specific for alcoholic steatohepatitis and has been described more generally with advanced fibrosis;²³ also, specificity of this ratio has not been evaluated in rapidly progressive steatohepatitis. In our opinion, both alcoholic steatohepatitis and aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis should be included in the histologic differential diagnosis when a patient presents with a rapidly progressive form of steatohepatitis.

It is estimated that 16% of bariatric surgery patients have incidental non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with nearly 4% expected to have bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis on initial evaluation,²⁴ which suggests slow evolution of a clinically silent disease in this population. In contrast, aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis presents with rapid liver failure before there is evidence of cirrhosis. This scenario was confirmed on liver biopsy from one patient in our study, who had only mild centrizonal pericellular fibrosis on initial biopsy, but after rapid weight loss developed aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. These observations suggest an acute/subacute mechanism of centrizonal liver injury related to rapid weight loss and/or malnutrition. Also, one survivor was found to have resolution of hepatocellular ballooning, with fibrosis remodeling, three years after presentation, to suggest that the liver may return to adequate function after weight stabilizes and/or nutrition returns to normal. Utilization of traditional staging and grading schemes for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis may not be appropriate in the setting of aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, as the original schemes were not developed to assess rapidly progressive liver injury.²²

A mechanism for aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in the setting of rapid weight loss/malnutrition is not yet apparent. Since most affected patients, in other reports on rapid weight loss, were morbidly obese, attention has been drawn to an increase in lipolysis and enhanced release of endogenous free fatty acid from adipose deposits.^18,25,26 Fat is rapidly mobilized from visceral adipose tissue and free fatty acids flood the portal circulation in rapid weight loss and may perhaps overwhelm hepatic parenchyma.²⁵ Oxidation of free fatty acid by hepatocytes, which first occurs in the central zone, creates reactive oxygen species that may trigger mitochondrial injury and cytokine release (eg, tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6),²⁷ which may correspond to damage in Zone 3 (as with other agents known to increase liver free radical formation (eg, carbon tetrachloride, acetaminophen, ethanol) or in ischemia-reperfusion injury). Also, increased intestinal permeability in malnutrition leads to an influx of endotoxin into the portal circulation, which increases tumor necrosis factor-α production.^28,29 Tumor necrosis factor-α has been specifically implicated as a biomarker in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.³⁰ Both fatty acids and endotoxin are hypothesized to aggravate the inflammatory activity of steatohepatitis.²⁷ Furthermore, a fatty liver is less tolerant to oxidative stress than normal liver.^18,31,32 Malnutrition also depresses hepatic antioxidant reserves and impairs overall metabolic function of mitochondria.^33,34 Similarly, primary graft dysfunction, which can occur in association with markedly steatotic liver allografts, corresponds to an impaired ability to recover from ischemia reperfusion.³⁵ It seems plausible that sustained delivery of enough free fatty acid (and perhaps associated endotoxin/cytokines), to an already compromised fatty liver, may underlie development of aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis,^18,31 but mechanistic studies are needed to further investigate this hypothesis and to consider a potential role for antioxidants to protect the liver during rapid weight loss/malnutrition. A genetic predisposition to developing rapidly progressive steatohepatitis is also a consideration and molecular testing could allow for additional insight into the mechanism of disease. For example, genome wide association analyses have identified specific gene polymorphisms (ie, patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3 (PNPLA3, rs738409, encoding I148M) and transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2, rs58542926, encoding Glu167Lys)) that may confer increased susceptibility to development of steatohepatitis.^3,36

Jejuno–ileal bypass is contraindicated for weight loss due to a high incidence of progressive hepatic disease leading to liver failure and cirrhosis.¹⁴ Such cases are reported to show histologic features similar to alcoholic steatohepatitis.³⁷ Liver complications in jejuno–ileal bypass are complex, with only a subset of patients developing liver failure, and the etiology is considered multifactorial, with ongoing chronic liver injury noted in some patients.^14,37,38 In addition to marked weight loss and severe malnutrition (related to poor absorption and severe diarrhea), the excluded intestine in this procedure is predisposed to bacterial overgrowth and synthesis of harmful endotoxin/lipopolysaccharide and/or bile acid metabolites.^{14,18,25,26,38} In contrast, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has a shorter bypassed segment, with exposure to bile and pancreatic juice, which reduces bacterial overgrowth.³⁹ In addition, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass usually achieves more controlled weight loss than jejuno–ileal bypass.^17,26,40 Liver failure associated with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is considered a rare event⁴¹ and cases of aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis seen in our series were specifically associated with rapid weight loss and/or malnutrition rather than a surgical complication. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is considered a safe procedure if drastic weight loss is avoided in the postoperative course.^17,25

In conclusion, we have encountered several cases of aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in association with rapid weight loss/malnutrition, which can result in over-emphasis of a potential alcohol etiology in pathology reports. While it may not be possible to entirely exclude an alcohol etiology, acute liver failure with extensive pericellular fibrosis, steatosis, hepatocellular ballooning, Mallory–Denk bodies, cholestasis, and central vein obliteration should not be specifically ascribed to alcohol and may represent an acute to subacute response to central zone injury during rapid weight loss/malnutrition. The histologic findings in aggressive non-alcoholic steatohepatitis may point to a similar mechanism of disease between alcoholic steatohepatitis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.