Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2018 Mar 12;293(18):6736–6750. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.816272

Elucidation of the 14-3-3ζ interactome reveals critical roles of RNA-splicing factors during adipogenesis

Yves Mugabo ‡,§, Mina Sadeghi ‡,§, Nancy N Fang ¶,1, Thibault Mayor , Gareth E Lim ‡,§,2
PMCID: PMC5936800  PMID: 29530978

Abstract

Adipogenesis involves a complex signaling network requiring strict temporal and spatial organization of effector molecules. Molecular scaffolds, such as 14-3-3 proteins, facilitate such organization, and we have previously identified 14-3-3ζ as an essential scaffold in adipocyte differentiation. The interactome of 14-3-3ζ is large and diverse, and it is possible that novel adipogenic factors may be present within it, but this possibility has not yet been tested. Herein, we generated mouse embryonic fibroblasts from mice overexpressing a tandem affinity purification (TAP) epitope–tagged 14-3-3ζ molecule. After inducing adipogenesis, TAP–14-3-3ζ complexes were purified, followed by MS analysis to determine the 14-3-3ζ interactome. We observed more than 100 proteins that were unique to adipocyte differentiation, 56 of which were novel interacting partners. Among these, we were able to identify previously established regulators of adipogenesis (i.e. Ptrf/Cavin1) within the 14-3-3ζ interactome, confirming the utility of this approach to detect adipogenic factors. We found that proteins related to RNA metabolism, processing, and splicing were enriched in the interactome. Analysis of transcriptomic data revealed that 14-3-3ζ depletion in 3T3-L1 cells affected alternative splicing of mRNA during adipocyte differentiation. siRNA-mediated depletion of RNA-splicing factors within the 14-3-3ζ interactome, that is, of Hnrpf, Hnrpk, Ddx6, and Sfpq, revealed that they have essential roles in adipogenesis and in the alternative splicing of Pparg and the adipogenesis-associated gene Lpin1. In summary, we have identified novel adipogenic factors within the 14-3-3ζ interactome. Further characterization of additional proteins within the 14-3-3ζ interactome may help identify novel targets to block obesity-associated expansion of adipose tissues.

Keywords: 14-3-3 protein, adipocyte, adipogenesis, alternative splicing, scaffold protein

Introduction

Central to the development of obesity are the increases in number and size of adipocytes, according to nutrient availability (1, 2). Despite various therapies to limit weight gain and promote weight loss, it is surprising that none specifically target the adipocyte to limit its expansion or growth (1, 2). The complex transcriptional network and cellular processes that govern the differentiation of adipocyte progenitor cells contribute to the difficulty in targeting adipocytes therapeutically (1, 2). Protein phosphorylation is a key post-translational modification that determines the activation state, subcellular localization, and stability of adipogenic regulators (37). Furthermore, phosphorylation status also determines their interactions with molecular scaffold proteins, which aid in the coordination of complex transcriptional networks (3, 4).

We previously identified the molecular scaffold, 14-3-3ζ, as a critical regulator of glucose homeostasis and adipogenesis (4, 8, 9). Specific to the adipocyte, systemic deletion of 14-3-3ζ in mice significantly reduced visceral adiposity and impaired adipocyte differentiation, whereas transgenic overexpression of 14-3-3ζ exacerbated high-fat diet induced obesity (4). The hedgehog transcription factor, Gli3, was identified as a critical downstream effector in 14-3-3ζ–mediated adipogenesis (4), but the diversity of proteins in the 14-3-3ζ interactome suggests the possibility that other interacting proteins or pathways parallel to Gli3 may be also involved.

Unbiased approaches, such as proteomics and transcriptomics, can lead to the discovery of novel factors that drive adipogenesis, in addition to providing insight into physiological pathways influenced by adipogenic regulators like 14-3-3ζ (4, 1013). All seven mammalian 14-3-3 isoforms have large, diverse interactomes (8, 1215), and they are dynamic and change in response to various stimuli (1013). Thus, inducing pre-adipocytes to differentiate may permit the identification of novel differentiation-specific factors within the 14-3-3ζ interactome and reveal pathways and biological processes that are essential to the development of a mature adipocyte.

To elucidate the 14-3-3ζ interactome during adipogenesis, we employed a proteomic-based discovery approach. Herein, we report that previously established factors required for adipogenesis, such as Ptrf/Cavin1 and Phb2 (Prohibitin-2), can be detected in the interactome, and novel factors, such as those involved in RNA splicing, are also enriched in the interactome during differentiation. To test for their roles in adipogenesis, siRNA knockdown approaches were used and revealed the requirement for RNA-splicing factors, such as Hnrpf, Sfpq, and Ddx6. Taken together, these findings demonstrate the usefulness of examining the interactome of 14-3-3 proteins in the context of a physiological process, such as adipocyte differentiation, and highlight the ability to find novel functional regulators through this approach. Understanding how the interactome is influenced by disease states, such as obesity, may lead to the identification of novel proteins that contribute to disease pathogenesis.

Results

Generation of TAP–14-3-3ζ mouse embryonic fibroblasts

To examine how adipocyte differentiation influences the 14-3-3ζ interactome, we generated mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs)3 derived from transgenic mice that moderately overexpress a TAP-epitope–tagged human 14-3-3ζ molecule (TAP–14-3-3ζ) (4) (Fig. 1A). This approach was chosen to circumvent the variability in the expression of transiently expressed proteins and increased specificity of protein purification with epitope-tagged proteins (16). Differentiation of TAP–14-3-3ζ MEFs was induced with an established adipogenic mixture (MDI: insulin, dexamethasone, and isobutylmethylxanthine), supplemented with rosiglitazone (Fig. 1, A and B), and confirmed by Oil Red-O staining and Pparg mRNA expression (Fig. 1, B and C).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Generation of TAP–14-3-3ζ MEFs to elucidate the 14-3-3ζ interactome. A, schematic overview of generation and use of TAP–14-3-3ζ MEFs to determine the 14-3-3ζ interactome during adipogenesis. B and C, verification of TAP–14-3-3ζ MEF adipogenesis by Oil Red-O incorporation, 7 days after induction (B), or Pparg mRNA expression by quantitative PCR (C), 2 days following induction (UD, undifferentiated cells; representative of n = 4 independent experiments; *, p < 0.05 when compared with -MDI; bar graphs represent means ± S.D.). Rosi., rosiglitazone. D, String-db (17) was used to visualize and cluster proteins according to their biological function, resulting in three distinct clusters: RNA splicing/processing factors, components of the ribosomal complex, and components of actin/tubulin network.

Differentiation of TAP–14-3-3ζ MEFs results in distinct changes in the interactome of 14-3-3ζ

Although we previously identified the hedgehog signaling effector, Gli3, as a downstream regulator of 14-3-3ζ-dependent adipogenesis (4), we hypothesized that 14-3-3ζ may control other parallel processes underlying adipocyte differentiation. This is due in part to the large, diverse interactomes of 14-3-3 proteins (8, 1215). Thus, we utilized affinity proteomics to identify interacting proteins that associate with 14-3-3ζ during adipocyte differentiation (Fig. 1A). The interactome of 14-3-3ζ at 24 h postinduction was examined because key signaling events underlying murine adipocyte differentiation occur during the first 24–48 h (2, 4). Over 100 proteins were identified by MS as 14-3-3ζ–interacting proteins (Table 1). Of these proteins, 56 have not been previously reported to interact with any member of the 14-3-3 protein family (Table 2) (14). 14-3-3ζ itself was found equally enriched in both samples, demonstrating equal pulldown efficiency (data not shown). An enrichment of differentiation-dependent 14-3-3ζ-interacting proteins associated with RNA splicing, translation, protein transport, and nucleic acid transport was detected using gene ontology to define their biological processes (17) (Table 3). Thus, these proteomic data demonstrate the dynamic nature of the 14-3-3ζ interactome and suggest that 14-3-3ζ may regulate multiple processes, such as RNA processing, during adipocyte differentiation.

Table 1.

Proteins with at least two unique peptides with a total spectral count in differentiated cells of ≥2 in comparison to undifferentiated cells

Uniprot Description Gene name Σ# Peptides Total spectrum IP1
Total spectrum IP2
D U D U
Q8VDD5 Myosin-9 Myh9 102 278 129 7 2
Q4FK11 Non-POU-domain-containing, octamer binding protein Nono 16 11 1 149 7
E9QMZ5 Plectin Plec 123 101 41 74 23
E9QPE8 Plectin Plec 122 99 41 75 23
G5E8B8 Anastellin Fn1 46 60 21 58 11
Q61879 Myosin-10 Myh10 68 107 41 2 1
P97855 Ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 1 G3bp1 20 20 6 94 45
P61979 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K Hnrnpk 16 35 10 62 29
Q9R002 Interferon-activable protein 202 Ifi202 13 4 0 45 1
B7FAU9 Filamin, α Flna 48 65 21 3 1
Q61033 Lamina-associated polypeptide 2, isoforms α/ζ Tmpo 19 13 3 31 1
B2RSN3 MCG1395 Tubb2b 17 33 7 23 10
Q91VR5 ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX1 Ddx1 29 16 3 42 17
P48962 ADP/ATP translocase 1 Slc25a4 14 27 6 29 13
P51881 ADP/ATP translocase 2 Slc25a5 12 25 6 27 10
Q60865 Caprin-1 Caprin1 19 10 3 50 23
Q8BMK4 Cytoskeleton-associated protein 4 Ckap4 17 22 5 22 6
B8JJG1 Novel protein (2810405J04Rik) Fam98a 9 8 1 30 7
Q61029 Lamina-associated polypeptide 2, isoforms β/δ/ϵ/γ Tmpo 14 12 4 23 2
Q8VIJ6 Splicing factor, proline- and glutamine-rich Sfpq 19 7 2 39 16
P62702 40S ribosomal protein S4, X isoform Rps4x 15 18 5 26 11
Q3TQX5 DEA(D/H) (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp/His) box polypeptide 3, X-linked Ddx3x 19 14 2 26 11
Q4VA29 MCG140066 2700060E02Rik 10 9 2 23 4
P14148 60S ribosomal protein L7 Rpl7 13 19 0 6 0
Q3UMM1 Tubulin, β 6 Tubb6 13 18 2 11 2
G3UXT7 RNA-binding protein FUS (Fragment) Fus 7 12 2 24 9
Q8VEM8 Phosphate carrier protein, mitochondrial Slc25a3 7 13 1 16 5
E9QPE7 Myosin-11 Myh11 18 34 13 2 0
A2A547 Ribosomal protein L19 Rpl19 6 11 1 13 1
P63038 60-kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrial Hspd1 13 14 0 13 5
D3Z6C3 Protein Gm10119 Gm10119 12 16 3 15 6
Q9DB20 ATP synthase subunit O, mitochondrial Atp5o 11 22 7 14 7
O70475 UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase Ugdh 14 17 0 5 1
A2APD4 Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein-associated protein Snrpb 5 5 2 19 1
O70309 Integrin β5 Itgb5 14 7 2 16 1
G3UZI2 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein Q Syncrip 11 9 1 16 4
D3Z6U8 Fragile X mental retardation protein 1 homolog Fmr1 15 8 3 21 7
O35841 Apoptosis inhibitor 5 Api5 11 8 1 12 1
A4FUS1 MCG123443 Rps16 12 9 4 24 11
Q3TLH4–5 Isoform 5 of protein PRRC2C Prrc2c 11 5 1 14 1
P14869 60S acidic ribosomal protein P0 Rplp0 8 16 5 8 2
Q8QZY1 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit L Eif3l 5 7 0 8 0
P35922 Fragile X mental retardation protein 1 homolog Fmr1 15 7 3 21 10
Q03265 ATP synthase subunit α, mitochondrial Atp5a1 15 14 3 4 2
P63017 Heat shock cognate 71-kDa protein Hspa8 13 9 2 12 6
P21981 Protein-glutamine γ-glutamyltransferase 2 Tgm2 8 5 0 7 0
Q80UM7 Mannosyl-oligosaccharide glucosidase Mogs 11 3 0 13 4
P26369 Splicing factor U2AF 65-kDa subunit U2af2 7 7 0 8 3
A2AJM8 MCG7378 Sec61b 3 3 1 9 0
P62242 40S ribosomal protein S8 Rps8 7 12 3 3 1
P54823 DEA(D/H) (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp/His) box polypeptide 6 Ddx6 8 2 1 13 3
Q3TML6 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2, subunit 3, structural gene X-linked Eif2s3x 6 7 1 8 3
P26041 Moesin Msn 13 5 0 12 6
P62983 Ubiquitin-40S ribosomal protein S27a Rps27a 6 5 2 13 5
P52480 Pyruvate kinase isozymes M1/M2 Pkm2 4 2 0 8 0
Q5SUT0 Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 Ewsr1 5 6 1 6 1
E9Q7H5 Uncharacterized protein Gm8991 6 3 0 10 3
Q8C2Q8 ATP synthase γ chain Atp5c1 7 5 1 9 3
A2AMW0 Capping protein (actin filament) muscle Z-line, β Capzb 7 13 6 3 0
P08121 Collagen α-1(III) chain Col3a1 6 5 0 4 0
P11087-2 Isoform 2 of collagen α-1(I) chain Col1a1 10 3 1 8 1
Q9Z2X1-2 Isoform 2 of Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F Hnrnpf 3 4 1 7 1
P11499 Heat shock protein HSP 90β Hsp90ab1 11 6 1 6 2
P28301 Protein-lysine 6-oxidase Lox 4 2 1 9 1
Q8VCQ8 Caldesmon 1 Cald1 13 12 6 4 1
P27659 60S ribosomal protein L3 Rpl3 7 9 1 2 1
O35737 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H Hnrnph1 4 3 1 6 0
A2ACG7 Dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide–protein glycosyltransferase subunit 2 Rpn2 7 3 0 6 1
Q3TVI8 Pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor-interacting protein 1 Pbxip1 6 3 0 6 1
F6QCI0 Protein Taf15 (fragment) Taf15 4 3 0 6 1
O88569-3 Isoform 3 of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins A2/B1 Hnrnpa2b1 5 4 1 6 1
O08583-2 Isoform 2 of THO complex subunit 4 Alyref 3 2 0 8 2
O08573-2 Isoform short of galectin-9 Lgals9 2 2 1 7 0
Q564E8 Ribosomal protein L4 Rpl4 8 7 3 6 2
B1ARA3 60S ribosomal protein L26 (fragment) Rpl26 6 5 0 5 2
O35129 Prohibitin-2 Phb2 4 4 0 7 3
D3YTQ9 40S ribosomal protein S15 Rps15 3 6 1 2 0
Q6ZWX6 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 1 Eif2s1 5 4 1 4 0
D3Z3R1 60S ribosomal protein L36 Gm5745 5 3 1 6 1
P17427 AP-2 complex subunit α2 Ap2a2 8 3 1 7 2
P56480 ATP synthase subunit β, mitochondrial Atp5b 9 2 1 8 2
Q8CBM2 Aspartate-β-hydroxylase Asph 8 4 0 6 3
Q6NVF9 Cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor subunit 6 Cpsf6 6 4 0 6 3
Q5SQB0 Nucleophosmin Npm1 5 6 0 2 1
Q6A0A9 Constitutive coactivator of PPARγ-like protein 1 FAM120A 5 2 0 4 0
P14576 Signal recognition particle 54-kDa protein Srp54 4 2 0 4 0
P63087 Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase PP1γ catalytic subunit Ppp1cc 4 4 0 2 0
P80315 T-complex protein 1 subunit δ Cct4 4 3 0 3 0
P62960 Nuclease-sensitive element-binding protein 1 Ybx1 3 2 0 5 1
P97376 Protein FRG1 Frg1 3 2 0 5 1
Q3U4Z7 High-density lipoprotein-binding protein, isoform CRA_d Hdlbp 7 3 0 4 1
B2RTB0 MCG17262 Pdap1 4 3 0 4 1
P60335 Poly(rC)-binding protein 1 Pcbp1 4 3 0 4 1
P47911 60S ribosomal protein L6 Rpl6 6 8 4 2 0
Q61990-2 Isoform 2 of poly(rC)-binding protein 2 Pcbp2 4 2 1 6 1
P62267 40S ribosomal protein S23 Rps23 5 4 1 6 3
D3Z148 Caveolin (fragment) Cav1 4 2 0 3 0
P84084 ADP-ribosylation factor 5 Arf5 4 2 0 3 0
O54724 Polymerase I and transcript release factor Ptrf 3 2 0 3 0
E9Q132 60S ribosomal protein L24 Rpl24 3 4 1 2 0
O54890 Integrin β3 Itgb3 5 3 1 3 0
O88477 Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 Igf2bp1 4 2 0 4 1
P61750 ADP-ribosylation factor 4 Arf4 4 2 0 4 1
Q9CR67 Transmembrane protein 33 OS Tmem33 3 2 0 4 1
Q5XJF6 Ribosomal protein L10a Rpl10a 7 6 3 2 0
Q3THB3 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein M Hnrnpm 5 2 1 4 0
Q6P5B5 Fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 2 Fxr2 5 3 1 5 2
D3Z6S1 Uncharacterized protein Tmem214 3 2 0 2 0
P11152 Lipoprotein lipase Lpl 3 2 0 2 0
Q9DCR2 AP-3 complex subunit σ1 Ap3s1 3 2 0 2 0
P59999 Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 4 Arpc4 2 3 1 2 0
P49312 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 Hnrnpa1 5 3 1 3 1
P61358 60S ribosomal protein L27 Rpl27 4 3 1 3 1
O54734 Dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide–protein glycosyltransferase 48-kDa subunit Ddost 3 2 1 3 0
Q07235 Glia-derived nexin Serpine2 6 2 0 4 2
Q7TNV0 Protein DEK Dek 5 3 0 2 1
Q922B2 Aspartate–tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic Dars 4 3 0 2 1
P62320 Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Sm D3 Snrpd3 3 2 1 5 2
P15864 Histone H1.2 Hist1h1c 2 2 1 5 2
Q8R0W0 Epiplakin Eppk1 3 2 1 3 1
Q6ZQ38 Cullin-associated NEDD8-dissociated protein 1 Cand1 4 2 1 2 1

Table 2.

Identification of novel interactors with 14-3-3 proteins

The information in this table is compared to the data of Johnson et al. (14). There is a total of 56 novel interactors.

Uniprot Description Gene name Previously reported to interact with 14-3-3ζ
Q8VDD5 Myosin-9 Myh9 Yes
Q4FK11 Non-POU-domain-containing, octamer binding protein Nono No
E9QMZ5 Plectin Plec No
E9QPE8 Plectin Plec No
G5E8B8 Anastellin Fn1 No
Q61879 Myosin-10 Myh10 Yes
P97855 Ras GTPase-activating protein-binding protein 1 G3bp1 Yes
P61979 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K Hnrnpk Yes
Q9R002 Interferon-activable protein 202 Ifi202 No
B7FAU9 Filamin, α Flna No
Q61033 Lamina-associated polypeptide 2, isoforms α/ζ Tmpo Yes
B2RSN3 MCG1395 Tubb2b Yes
Q91VR5 ATP-dependent RNA helicase DDX1 Ddx1 Yes
P48962 ADP/ATP translocase 1 Slc25a4 Yes
P51881 ADP/ATP translocase 2 Slc25a5 Yes
Q60865 Caprin-1 Caprin1 Yes
Q8BMK4 Cytoskeleton-associated protein 4 Ckap4 Yes
B8JJG1 Novel protein (2810405J04Rik) Fam98a No
Q61029 Lamina-associated polypeptide 2, isoforms β/δ/ϵ/γ Tmpo Yes
Q8VIJ6 Splicing factor, proline- and glutamine-rich Sfpq Yes
P62702 40S ribosomal protein S4, X isoform Rps4x Yes
Q3TQX5 DEA(D/H) (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp/His) box polypeptide 3, X-linked Ddx3x No
Q4VA29 MCG140066 2700060E02Rik No
P14148 60S ribosomal protein L7 Rpl7 Yes
Q3UMM1 Tubulin, β6 Tubb6 No
G3UXT7 RNA-binding protein FUS (fragment) Fus No
Q8VEM8 Phosphate carrier protein, mitochondrial Slc25a3 Yes
E9QPE7 Myosin-11 Myh11 No
A2A547 Ribosomal protein L19 Rpl19 No
P63038 60-kDa heat shock protein, mitochondrial Hspd1 Yes
D3Z6C3 Protein Gm10119 Gm10119 No
Q9DB20 ATP synthase subunit O, mitochondrial Atp5o Yes
O70475 UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase Ugdh No
A2APD4 Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein-associated protein Snrpb No
O70309 Integrin β5 Itgb5 No
G3UZI2 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein Q Syncrip No
D3Z6U8 Fragile X mental retardation protein 1 homolog Fmr1 No
O35841 Apoptosis inhibitor 5 Api5 No
A4FUS1 MCG123443 Rps16 No
Q3TLH4-5 Isoform 5 of protein PRRC2C Prrc2c No
P14869 60S acidic ribosomal protein P0 Rplp0 Yes
Q8QZY1 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit L Eif3l No
P35922 Fragile X mental retardation protein 1 homolog Fmr1 Yes
Q03265 ATP synthase subunit α, mitochondrial Atp5a1 Yes
P63017 Heat shock cognate 71-kDa protein Hspa8 Yes
P21981 Protein-glutamine γ-glutamyltransferase 2 Tgm2 Yes
Q80UM7 Mannosyl-oligosaccharide glucosidase Mogs Yes
P26369 Splicing factor U2AF 65-kDa subunit U2af2 No
A2AJM8 MCG7378 Sec61b No
P62242 40S ribosomal protein S8 Rps8 Yes
P54823 DEA(D/H) (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp/His) box polypeptide 6 Ddx6 Yes
Q3TML6 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2, subunit 3, structural gene X-linked Eif2s3x No
P26041 Moesin Msn Yes
P62983 Ubiquitin-40S ribosomal protein S27a Rps27a Yes
P52480 Pyruvate kinase isozymes M1/M2 Pkm2 Yes
Q5SUT0 Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 Ewsr1 No
E9Q7H5 Uncharacterized protein Gm8991 No
Q8C2Q8 ATP synthase γ chain Atp5c1 No
A2AMW0 Capping protein (actin filament) muscle Z-line, β Capzb No
P08121 Collagen α-1(III) chain Col3a1 Yes
P11087-2 Isoform 2 of collagen α-1(I) chain Col1a1 Yes
Q9Z2X1-2 Isoform 2 of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F Hnrnpf Yes
P11499 Heat shock protein HSP 90β Hsp90ab1 Yes
P28301 Protein-lysine 6-oxidase Lox Yes
Q8VCQ8 Caldesmon 1 Cald1 No
P27659 60S ribosomal protein L3 Rpl3 Yes
O35737 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H Hnrnph1 Yes
A2ACG7 Dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide–protein glycosyltransferase subunit 2 Rpn2 No
Q3TVI8 Pre-B-cell leukemia transcription factor-interacting protein 1 Pbxip1 No
F6QCI0 Protein Taf15 (fragment) Taf15 No
O88569-3 Isoform 3 of Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins A2/B1 Hnrnpa2b1 Yes
O08583-2 Isoform 2 of THO complex subunit 4 Alyref Yes
O08573-2 Isoform short of galectin-9 Lgals9 Yes
Q564E8 Ribosomal protein L4 Rpl4 No
B1ARA3 60S ribosomal protein L26 (Fragment) Rpl26 No
O35129 Prohibitin-2 Phb2 Yes
D3YTQ9 40S ribosomal protein S15 Rps15 No
Q6ZWX6 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 1 Eif2s1 Yes
D3Z3R1 60S ribosomal protein L36 Gm5745 No
P17427 AP-2 complex subunit α2 Ap2a2 No
P56480 ATP synthase subunit β, mitochondrial Atp5b Yes
Q8CBM2 Aspartate-β-hydroxylase Asph No
Q6NVF9 Cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor subunit 6 Cpsf6 Yes
Q5SQB0 Nucleophosmin Npm1 No
Q6A0A9 Constitutive coactivator of PPARγ-like protein 1 FAM120A Yes
P14576 Signal recognition particle 54-kDa protein Srp54 No
P63087 Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase PP1γ catalytic subunit Ppp1cc Yes
P80315 T-complex protein 1 subunit δ Cct4 Yes
P62960 Nuclease-sensitive element-binding protein 1 Ybx1 Yes
P97376 Protein FRG1 Frg1 No
Q3U4Z7 High-density lipoprotein-binding protein, isoform CRA_d Hdlbp No
B2RTB0 MCG17262 Pdap1 No
P60335 Poly(rC)-binding protein 1 Pcbp1 Yes
P47911 60S ribosomal protein L6 Rpl6 Yes
Q61990-2 Isoform 2 of Poly(rC)-binding protein 2 Pcbp2 Yes
P62267 40S ribosomal protein S23 Rps23 Yes
D3Z148 Caveolin (Fragment) Cav1 No
P84084 ADP-ribosylation factor 5 Arf5 Yes
O54724 Polymerase I and transcript release factor Ptrf Yes
E9Q132 60S ribosomal protein L24 Rpl24 No
O54890 Integrin β-3 Itgb3 No
O88477 Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 Igf2bp1 Yes
P61750 ADP-ribosylation factor 4 Arf4 Yes
Q9CR67 Transmembrane protein 33 OS Tmem33 Yes
Q5XJF6 Ribosomal protein L10a Rpl10a No
Q3THB3 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein M Hnrnpm No
Q6P5B5 Fragile X mental retardation syndrome-related protein 2 Fxr2 No
D3Z6S1 Uncharacterized protein Tmem214 No
P11152 Lipoprotein lipase Lpl Yes
Q9DCR2 AP-3 complex subunit σ1 Ap3s1 No
P59999 Actin-related protein 2/3 complex subunit 4 Arpc4 Yes
P49312 Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 Hnrnpa1 Yes
P61358 60S ribosomal protein L27 Rpl27 Yes
O54734 Dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide–protein glycosyltransferase 48-kDa subunit Ddost Yes
Q07235 Glia-derived nexin Serpine2 No
Q7TNV0 Protein DEK Dek Yes
Q922B2 Aspartate–tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic Dars No
P62320 Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein Sm D3 Snrpd3 Yes
P15864 Histone H1.2 Hist1h1c Yes
Q8R0W0 Epiplakin Eppk1 No
Q6ZQ38 Cullin-associated NEDD8-dissociated protein 1 Cand1 Yes

Table 3.

Gene ontology classification of proteomic hits by biological process

FDR, false discovery rate.

p value Benjamini FDR
Annotation cluster 1 (enrichment score: 10.542304553852539)
    GO:0006397 mRNA processing 2.80E-12 1.18E-09 4.33E-09
    GO:0008380 RNA splicing 8.22E-12 2.31E-09 1.27E-08
    GO:0016071 mRNA metabolic process 2.70E-11 5.71E-09 4.18E-08
    GO:0006396 RNA processing 1.09E-09 1.84E-07 1.68E-06

Annotation cluster 2 (enrichment score: 2.9768010746589035)
    GO:0065003 Macromolecular complex assembly 1.23E-04 0.01719154 0.19018503
    GO:0006461 Protein complex assembly 1.87E-04 0.01956598 0.28880909
    GO:0070271 Protein complex biogenesis 1.87E-04 0.01956598 0.28880909
    GO:0043933 Macromolecular complex subunit organization 2.40E-04 0.02229116 0.37052613
    GO:0034621 Cellular macromolecular complex subunit organization 0.001634086 0.10877737 2.49672826
    GO:0034622 Cellular macromolecular complex assembly 0.004135111 0.20818502 6.20540124
    GO:0043623 Cellular protein complex assembly 0.00690653 0.26524962 10.1607298
    GO:0051258 Protein polymerization 0.031762743 0.57358582 39.2881889

Annotation cluster 3 (enrichment score: 2.7758570598049186)
    GO:0015931 Nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide, and nucleic acid transport 1.65E-04 0.01976438 0.25533903
    GO:0051236 Establishment of RNA localization 0.001160158 0.09343294 1.77868077
    GO:0050658 RNA transport 0.001160158 0.09343294 1.77868077
    GO:0050657 Nucleic acid transport 0.001160158 0.09343294 1.77868077
    GO:0006403 RNA localization 0.001227278 0.09002225 1.88067318

Annotation cluster 4 (enrichment score: 1.3081305561358054)
    GO:0015986 ATP synthesis-coupled proton transport 0.002165467 0.13143078 3.29598278
    GO:0015985 Energy-coupled proton transport, down electrochemical gradient 0.002165467 0.13143078 3.29598278
    GO:0034220 Ion transmembrane transport 0.00311983 0.17188096 4.71608221
    GO:0015992 Proton transport 0.005711473 0.26103289 8.47469156
    GO:0006818 Hydrogen transport 0.006023853 0.24696352 8.91824507
    GO:0006119 Oxidative phosphorylation 0.007021577 0.25748192 10.3215008
    GO:0006754 ATP biosynthetic process 0.019701699 0.53433002 26.4817286
    GO:0046034 ATP metabolic process 0.025117659 0.59165663 32.5166079
    GO:0009201 Ribonucleoside triphosphate biosynthetic process 0.027334987 0.59373718 34.8509636
    GO:0009206 Purine ribonucleoside triphosphate biosynthetic process 0.027334987 0.59373718 34.8509636
    GO:0009145 Purine nucleoside triphosphate biosynthetic process 0.028096637 0.59012787 35.6352295
    GO:0009142 Nucleoside triphosphate biosynthetic process 0.02886954 0.5741125 36.4220479
    GO:0009205 Purine ribonucleoside triphosphate metabolic process 0.033742375 0.58476996 41.1791708
    GO:0009199 Ribonucleoside triphosphate metabolic process 0.034593574 0.58312761 41.9751939
    GO:0006091 Generation of precursor metabolites and energy 0.03610049 0.58839461 43.3597731
    GO:0009144 Purine nucleoside triphosphate metabolic process 0.038109124 0.58825354 45.1573304
    GO:0009152 Purine ribonucleotide biosynthetic process 0.039015563 0.58726975 45.9509181
    GO:0055085 Transmembrane transport 0.042081945 0.60604395 48.5566327
    GO:0009260 Ribonucleotide biosynthetic process 0.042750615 0.59362044 49.1090183
    GO:0009141 Nucleoside triphosphate metabolic process 0.046658895 0.60897427 52.228246

Annotation cluster 5 (enrichment score: 1.1516193992206216)
    GO:0001568 Blood vessel development 0.028163983 0.57774561 35.7041482
    GO:0001944 Vasculature development 0.030823763 0.58598984 38.3715132

Identification of known regulators of adipocyte differentiation in the 14-3-3ζ interactome

We were able to detect proteins with known and purported roles in adipogenesis, such as Ptrf/Cavin1, Phb2, Fragile-X mental retardation protein-1 (Fmr1), and Rpn2, through our proteomic analysis of the 14-3-3ζ interactome (Table 1 and Fig. 1D) (1823). These proteins do not have any purported roles in RNA splicing. Using siRNA-mediated knockdown approaches, we examined their roles in adipocyte differentiation, as assessed by Oil Red-O incorporation and Pparg mRNA and Ppargγ protein measurements (Fig. 2 and Fig. S1A). Of the factors examined, only knockdown of Ptrf/Cavin1 attenuated 3T3-L1 adipogenesis (Fig. 2 and Fig. S1A). When taken together, these findings highlight the ability of identifying known regulators of adipogenesis within the 14-3-3ζ interactome and suggest the possibility that novel adipogenic factors can also be identified through this approach.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Known regulators of adipogenesis can be found within the 14-3-3ζ interactome. A, 3T3-L1 cells were transfected with a control siRNA (siCon) or two independent siRNAs (siRNAs 1 and 2) against target mRNA, and knockdown efficiency was measured by quantitative PCR (n = 4 per group; *, p < 0.05 when compared with siCon-transfected cells; bar graphs represent means ± S.D.). B and C, transient knockdown by siRNA of previously identified regulators of adipogenesis or those associated with the development of obesity was used to examine their contributions to adipocyte differentiation (+MDI), as assessed by visualization of Oil Red-O incorporation (B), absorbance (490 nm, C) (*, p < 0.05 when compared with siCon + MDI; bar graphs represent means ± S.D.). D–F, measurement of total Pparg mRNA levels (D) or Pparγ protein abundance (E and F) in siCon or siRNA-transfected 3T3-L1 cells induced to differentiate (+MDI) for 48 h (n = 4 per group; *, p < 0.05 when compared with siCon-transfected differentiated cells; bar graphs represent means ± S.D.).

Requirement of RNA processing during adipogenesis

Because enrichments in RNA splicing proteins were detected in the 14-3-3ζ interactome during differentiation (Table 1), it suggested that 14-3-3ζ could influence pre-mRNA processing during adipogenesis. Splicing is mediated by the spliceosome complex, which removes intronic regions from pre-mRNA (constitutive) or facilitates alternative splicing of mRNA at regulatory regions enriched with splicing factors (24). Initially, the spliceosome inhibitor, madrasin, was used to examine the requirement of the spliceosome during adipocyte differentiation (25), and inhibition of the spliceosome blocked adipogenesis (Fig. 3, A and B). Pre-mRNA of the canonical adipogenic gene, Pparg, undergoes alternative splicing to yield Pparg1 and Pparg2 mRNAs, which are further translated into Pparγ isoforms, Pparγ1 and Pparγ2 (2629). To examine whether the spliceosome is involved in processing of Pparg mRNA, we utilized quantitative PCR to measure mRNA levels of Pparg1, Pparg2, and a novel Pparg1 variant, Pparg1sv (29). Spliceosome inhibition significantly reduced the expression of the Pparg2 and Pparg1sv mRNA (Fig. 3B). Thus, the activity of the spliceosome is required for adipocyte differentiation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Inhibition of the spliceosome or depletion of 14-3-3ζ prevents the alternative splicing of Pparg mRNA. A, 3T3-L1 cells were incubated with 1 or 10 μm madrasin in the presence of the adipogenic differentiation mixture (MDI), followed by differentiation for 7 days. Adipogenesis was assessed by Oil Red-O incorporation (representative of n = 5 independent experiments). B, RNA was isolated from madrasin-treated cells induced to differentiate for 48 h, and quantitative PCR was used to measure Pparg splice variants (n = 5 per group; *, p < 0.05 when compared with undifferentiated cells; #, p < 0.05 when compared with 0 μm madrasin, differentiated cells; bar graphs represent means ± S.D.). C, 3T3-L1 cells were transfected with siRNA against 14-3-3ζ or siCon and differentiated for 48 h, followed by isolation of total RNA to measure Pparg splice variants by quantitative PCR (n = 4 per group; *, p < 0.05 when compared with undifferentiated siCon-transfected cells; #, p < 0.05 when compared with differentiated, siCon-transfected cells; bar graphs represent means ± S.D.). D and E, 3T3-L1 cells were transfected with siRNA against 14-3-3ζ or siCon and differentiated for up to 7 days, followed by isolation of protein to measure Pparγ isoforms by immunoblotting (D). Protein abundance for each Pparγ isoform was measured by densitometry (E) (n = 4 per group; *, p < 0.05 when compared with undifferentiated siCon-transfected cells; #, p < 0.05 when compared with differentiated, siCon-transfected cells; bar graphs represent means ± S.D.).

Within the adipocyte differentiation-associated 14-3-3ζ interactome, U2AF, a component of the spliceosome, was detected (Table 1) (24). This suggests that 14-3-3ζ may influence the activity of the spliceosome during adipogenesis through its interactions. Focusing on Pparg, we found that siRNA-mediated depletion of 14-3-3ζ significantly blocked the increase in total Pparg mRNA levels and attenuated the production of Pparg1, Pparg2, and Pparg1sv splice variants (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, significantly decreased abundance of Pparγ1 and Pparγ2 protein was detected in 14-3-3ζ-depleted cells (Fig. 3, D and E). When taken together, these findings demonstrate the importance of the spliceosome and suggest indirect actions of 14-3-3ζ in the splicing of key adipogenic mRNAs.

Regulation of mRNA processing by 14-3-3ζ during adipocyte differentiation

To gain a better understanding of the global effects of 14-3-3ζ depletion on mRNA splicing, we utilized our previous transcriptomic analysis from control and 14-3-3ζ-depleted 3T3-L1 cells undergoing differentiation (4). Differential exon usage (DEXSeq) was used as a surrogate measure of alternative splicing of mRNA (Fig. 4A) (30). Any changes in splice variant levels were not due to global effects of 14-3-3ζ depletion on RNA transcription because no gross differences in the incorporation of a uracil analog were detected (Fig. 4B). At 24 and 48 h postdifferentiation, 163 and 172 unique genes, respectively, were found to undergo differential exon usage (Fig. 4C). Gene ontology analysis revealed that at each time point, distinct groups of genes were alternatively spliced (Table 4). The use of this approach to detect genes with DEXSeq was validated by the ability to detect alternative exon usage in Pparg after 48 h of differentiation (Fig. S2) (28). The effect of 14-3-3ζ depletion was assessed at each time point, and 78, 37, and 36 genes were affected following 14-3-3ζ knockdown at 0, 24, and 48 h, respectively, after the induction of differentiation (Fig. 4D). However, only in undifferentiated 3T3-L1 cells could enrichments in genes associated with macromolecular complex assembly (GO:0065003, p = 3.44 × 10−3), macromolecular complex subunit organization (GO:0043933, p = 7.56 × 10−4), and regulation of biological quality (GO:0065008, p = 9.51 × 10−3) be detected by gene ontology analysis. Collectively, these data demonstrate that adipogenesis promotes the alternative splicing of genes, and this process can be influenced by 14-3-3ζ.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Induction of differentiation or depletion of 14-3-3ζ in 3T3-L1 cells promotes alternative splicing of mRNA. A, differential exon usage of genes involved in adipogenesis was compared in control or 14-3-3ζ-depleted 3T3-L1 cells undergoing adipocyte differentiation. Transcriptomic data were aligned via TopHat and subsequently subjected to DEXSeq analysis to measure differential exon usage. B, to rule out an effect of 14-3-3ζ depletion on global RNA transcription, siCon, or 14-3-3ζ depleted cells (si14-3-3ζ) were incubated with 5-ethynyl uridine, followed by Click-iT chemistry to detect newly synthesized RNA (scale bars, 10 μm; representative of n = 4 experiments). C and D, comparison of genes exhibiting differential exon usage in control cells 0, 24, and 48 h after differentiation (C) or control or 14-3-3ζ depleted cells at each time point (D). The overlapping regions of each Venn diagram denote genes that are common to each condition or treatment.

Table 4.

Analysis of common and unique genes during the first 48 h of 3T3-L1 adipogenesis

Comparison GO biological process complete Mus musculus: REFLIST (22221) upload_1
230 Expected Over/under Fold enrichment p value
Common to all time points Xenobiotic glucuronidation (GO:0052697) 9 9 0.09 + 96.61 9.70E-12
Flavonoid glucuronidation (GO:0052696) 9 9 0.09 + 96.61 9.70E-12
Flavonoid metabolic process (GO:0009812) 11 9 0.11 + 79.05 5.80E-11
Cellular glucuronidation (GO:0052695) 12 9 0.12 + 72.46 1.26E-10
Uronic acid metabolic process (GO:0006063) 13 9 0.13 + 66.89 2.56E-10
Glucuronate metabolic process (GO:0019585) 13 9 0.13 + 66.89 2.56E-10
Cellular response to xenobiotic stimulus (GO:0071466) 50 10 0.52 + 19.32 1.68E-06
Xenobiotic metabolic process (GO:0006805) 46 9 0.48 + 18.9 1.66E-05
Response to xenobiotic stimulus (GO:0009410) 56 10 0.58 + 17.25 4.95E-06
Monosaccharide metabolic process (GO:0005996) 152 12 1.57 + 7.63 7.67E-04
Single-organism carbohydrate metabolic process (GO:0044723) 301 15 3.12 + 4.81 6.68E-03
Cell adhesion (GO:0007155) 754 35 7.8 + 4.48 1.34E-09
Biological adhesion (GO:0022610) 764 35 7.91 + 4.43 1.95E-09
Carbohydrate metabolic process (GO:0005975) 385 17 3.98 + 4.27 6.36E-03
Cell–cell signaling (GO:0007267) 792 34 8.2 + 4.15 2.62E-08
Nervous system development (GO:0007399) 2086 50 21.59 + 2.32 1.40E-04
Multicellular organism development (GO:0007275) 4498 76 46.56 + 1.63 3.16E-02
Single-organism developmental process (GO:0044767) 5073 85 52.51 + 1.62 8.08E-03
Developmental process (GO:0032502) 5112 85 52.91 + 1.61 1.12E-02
Primary metabolic process (GO:0044238) 7337 113 75.94 + 1.49 2.66E-03
Cellular metabolic process (GO:0044237) 7109 109 73.58 + 1.48 7.04E-03
Organic substance metabolic process (GO:0071704) 7692 117 79.62 + 1.47 2.59E-03
Metabolic process (GO:0008152) 8159 122 84.45 + 1.44 2.85E-03
Single-organism cellular process (GO:0044763) 8646 129 89.49 + 1.44 8.63E-04
Cellular process (GO:0009987) 13696 182 141.76 + 1.28 8.17E-05
G-protein–coupled receptor signaling pathway (GO:0007186) 1803 3 18.66 - < 0.2 4.79E-02
Unique to 24 h Negative regulation of response to cytokine stimulus (GO:0060761) 43 5 0.24 + 21.01 4.10E-02
DNA repair (GO:0006281) 400 12 2.21 + 5.42 2.22E-02
Cellular response to DNA damage stimulus (GO:0006974) 618 15 3.42 + 4.38 1.60E-02
Cellular macromolecular complex assembly (GO:0034622) 624 15 3.45 + 4.34 1.80E-02
Cellular macromolecule metabolic process (GO:0044260) 5396 60 29.87 + 2.01 2.97E-05
Macromolecule metabolic process (GO:0043170) 6113 66 33.84 + 1.95 7.53E-06
Cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process (GO:0034641) 4081 44 22.59 + 1.95 3.18E-02
Primary metabolic process (GO:0044238) 7337 78 40.61 + 1.92 4.49E-08
Organic substance metabolic process (GO:0071704) 7692 80 42.58 + 1.88 5.30E-08
Nitrogen compound metabolic process (GO:0006807) 6786 69 37.56 + 1.84 3.16E-05
Cellular metabolic process (GO:0044237) 7109 72 39.35 + 1.83 1.07E-05
Metabolic process (GO:0008152) 8159 80 45.16 + 1.77 1.51E-06
Cellular process (GO:0009987) 13696 101 75.81 + 1.33 6.09E-03
Unique to 48 h Positive regulation of molecular function (GO:0044093) 1317 23 7.88 + 2.92 3.07E-02

Requirement of RNA-splicing factors in adipocyte differentiation

14-3-3ζ is not a bona fide splicing factor, and it is likely that specific RNA-splicing factors within its interactome are responsible for the observed effects on differential exon usage (Fig. 4D). Transient transfection of siRNA in 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes against eight splicing factors identified in our proteomic analysis of the 14-3-3ζ interactome (Table 1) was performed to examine their roles in 3T3-L1 adipogenesis (Fig. 5 and Fig. S1B). They were chosen by the number of connections exhibited within each cluster of proteins (Fig. 1D) (17). Transcript levels of the chosen splicing factors, as determined by RNA-Seq, were generally unaffected by knockdown of 14-3-3ζ; however, some splicing factors were influenced by differentiation (Fig. S3) (GEO accession code GSE60745). Knockdown of Ddx6, Sfpq, Hnrpf, or Hnrpk was sufficient to impair 3T3-L1 differentiation, as assessed by Oil Red-O incorporation and total Pparg mRNA expression (Fig. 5 and Fig. S1B). Closely related proteins with similar roles, such as Ddx1, Nono, Hnrpm, and Syncrip (Hnrpq) were not required for 3T3-L1 adipogenesis (Fig. 5 and Fig. S1B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

RNA splicing proteins are required for 3T3-L1 adipogenesis. A, 3T3-L1 cells were transfected with a siCon or two independent siRNAs (siRNAs 1 and 2) against target mRNA, and knockdown efficiency was measured by quantitative PCR (n = 4 per group; *, p < 0.05; bar graphs represent means ± S.D.). B–D, transient knockdown by siRNA was used to examine the contributions of RNA-splicing factors to adipocyte differentiation (+MDI), as assessed by visualization of Oil Red-O incorporation (B), absorbance associated with Oil Red-O (490 nm, C), or Pparg mRNA expression (D) (n = 4 per group; *, p < 0.05 when compared with differentiated, siCon-transfected cells; bar graphs represent means ± S.D.).

To further explore the role of splicing factors within the 14-3-3ζ interactome, we examined the impact of their depletion on Pparg mRNA splice variant formation and Pparγ protein abundance. In undifferentiated cells, knockdown of Hnrnpf and Ddx6 had effects on the levels of Pparg1 or Pparg2 mRNA (Fig. 6A). However, in differentiating 3T3-L1 cells, only knockdown of Hnrnpf and Sfpq were found to significantly reduce Pparg2 or Pparg1sv mRNA levels (Fig. 6A). Pparγ1 and Pparγ2 protein levels differed from what was observed with the pattern of Pparg mRNA variants. Ddx6-depleted cells exhibited significantly decreased Pparγ1 abundance, whereas all siRNA-transfected cells significantly reduced Pparγ2 (Fig. 6, B and C). Another adipogenic gene that undergoes alternative splicing is Lpin1. This results in the generation of splice variants, Lipin-1α and Lipin-1β, which have differential roles on adipogenesis (32). To examine the effect of depletion of 14-3-3ζ, Hnrpf, Ddx6, Hnrpk, and Sfpq on Lpin1 splicing, 3T3-L1 cells were transiently transfected with siRNA, followed by the induction of differentiation. Gene silencing of all target genes decreased the generation of the Lpin-1α variant during differentiation (Fig. S4). Of note, the commercially available antibody used to detect mature Lipin-1 could not differentiate between either splice variant, but knockdown of 14-3-3ζ, Hnrpf, Ddx6, Hnrpk, and Sfpq reduced total Lipin-1 abundance (Fig. 3D and 6B). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that novel regulators of adipogenesis can be identified within the interactome of 14-3-3ζ and highlight novel roles of splicing factors in the development of a mature adipocyte.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

siRNA-mediated knockdown of identified splicing factors in the 14-3-3ζ interactome alters the splicing of Pparg mRNA. A, 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes were transfected with siCon or target-specific siRNAs, followed by differentiation (+MDI) for 48 h. Total RNA was isolated, and quantitative PCR was used to measure Pparg mRNA splice variants (n = 4 per group; *, p < 0.05 when compared with undifferentiated siCon-transfected cells; #, p < 0.05 when compared with differentiated, siCon-transfected cells; bar graphs represent means ± S.D.). B and C, 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes were transfected with siCon or target-specific siRNAs, followed by differentiation (+MDI) for up to 7 days. Following isolation of total cell lysates, immunoblotting was performed to measure Pparγ1 or 2 and Lipin-1 protein abundance (B). Densitometric analysis was utilized to assess the impact of target knockdown on Pparγ1 or 2 abundance (C) (n = 4 per group; *, p < 0.05 when compared with undifferentiated siRNA-transfected cells; #, p < 0.05 when compared with differentiated siCon-transfected cells; bar graphs represent means ± S.D.).

Discussion

In the present study, affinity proteomics was used to determine how adipogenesis influences the interactome of 14-3-3ζ. Surprisingly, the interactome was dynamic, because differentiation altered the landscape of proteins that interact with 14-3-3ζ. This approach permitted the identification of processes that may be regulated by 14-3-3ζ during adipocyte differentiation and led to the discovery of novel adipogenic factors within the 14-3-3ζ interactome that are required for adipocyte differentiation. Namely, an enrichment of proteins associated with RNA processing and splicing was detected, and the novel contributions of RNA-splicing factors, such as Hnrpf, Ddx6, and Sfpq, in adipogenesis were identified. Future in-depth analysis of all 14-3-3ζ–interacting partners may reveal novel factors and pathways that facilitate adipocyte differentiation and may aid in the development of approaches to control adipogenesis as a means to treat obesity.

We previously identified an essential function of the hedgehog signaling effector Gli3 in 14-3-3ζ-regulated adipocyte differentiation (4). However, because of the large, diverse interactome of 14-3-3 proteins (10, 14), we hypothesized that it is unlikely that one protein would be solely responsible for 14-3-3ζ–mediated adipogenesis. It is known that the interactomes of 14-3-3 proteins are dynamic and change in response to various stimuli (8, 1015). The functional significance of such changes in the interactome is not clear, but it suggests that 14-3-3 proteins may regulate biological processes critical for adipocyte development through their interactions. Using a gene onotology-based approach, we found that the 14-3-3ζ interactome is enriched with proteins involved in RNA binding and splicing during differentiation and identified its contribution to the alternative splicing of mRNAs. Because over 100 proteins were found to be unique to the 14-3-3ζ interactome during adipocyte differentiation, it suggests that 14-3-3ζ may also regulate other cellular processes required for adipocyte development. For example, we detected an interaction of 14-3-3ζ with the mitochondrial regulator, Phb2 (Prohibitin-2) (Table 1), which others have shown to be essential for the expansion of mitochondria mass and mitochondrial function during adipogenesis (18, 19). Further in-depth studies are required to assess whether 14-3-3ζ has regulatory roles in mitochondrial dynamics, but when taken together, it demonstrates the possibility of examining the individual contributions of interacting partners to elucidate key biological processes required for adipocyte differentiation.

The spliceosome is responsible for constitutive and alternative splicing of mRNA, whereby intronic regions of mRNA are removed or sections of mRNA enriched with splicing factors at regulatory elements are removed, respectively (24). Various splicing factors have been found to be important for adipogenesis (33, 34), but no studies have directly tested the role of the spliceosome in this process. To this end, we found that inhibition of the spliceosome with madrasin was sufficient to block 3T3-L1 adipogenesis and prevent the generation of various Pparg splice variants. In our analysis of the 14-3-3ζ interactome, we detected the interaction of 14-3-3ζ with U2AF, a component of the spliceosome. 14-3-3ζ-associated interactions can modulate the activity of interacting partners (4, 35), suggesting that 14-3-3ζ could influence the activity of the spliceosome and interfere with processes associated with constitutive or alternative splicing. Although the approaches used in the present study were unable to measure effects on constitutive splicing, we were able to detect changes in alternative splicing at the level of Pparg and from whole transcriptome data (4). The exact mechanisms by which 14-3-3ζ is able to influence alternative splicing is not known, and 14-3-3ζ is likely dependent on the specific splicing factors that it interacts with during differentiation.

Through the use of a functional siRNA screen, we identified novel adipogenic roles of various RNA-splicing factors involved in alternative splicing. These include Hnrpf, Hnrpk, Ddx6, and Sfpq. Sfpq belongs to the DHBS (Drosophila behavior/human splicing) protein family and is required for transcriptional regulation (36, 37). Although a recent study by Wang et al. (38) found no effect of forced overexpression of Nono and Sfpq on adipogenesis, we report that Sfpq depletion impairs adipocyte differentiation. DHBS proteins may exhibit redundant, compensatory functions (39), but given that only Sfpq depletion impaired 3T3-L1 adipogenesis, it suggests specific protein–protein or protein–nucleic acid interactions occur may with each DHBS member in the context of differentiation (37). We were also able to detect novel adipogenic roles of Hnrpf and Hnrpk, members of the heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (Hnrps), which facilitate mRNA splicing (40, 41). Alternative splicing of mRNA is critical for maintaining genetic diversity and cell identity, in addition to the expression of key factors required for differentiation (42, 43). Specific to adipogenesis, differential promoter usage and alternative splicing are required for the expression of the canonical adipogenic transcription factor Pparγ (2628, 43). Other regulatory factors are also formed from alternative splicing, including nCOR1 and Lipin1 (33, 43, 44). In the present study, we identified distinct roles of each splicing factor in generating Pparg mRNA splice variants. Not all tested splicing factors had significant effects on Pparg mRNA or total Pparγ protein levels, despite being required for differentiation. It is likely that they control the splicing of other genes, such as Lpin-1, that are required for adipogenesis. Thus, future studies aimed at elucidating the generation of splice variants by each splicing factor would greatly increase the current knowledge of key factors required for adipocyte development.

Protein abundance of 14-3-3ζ and other isoforms is increased in visceral adipose tissue from obese individuals (45, 46), and we have previously reported that systemic overexpression of 14-3-3ζ in mice is sufficient to potentiate weight gain and fat mass in mice fed a high-fat diet (4). With respect to the pancreatic β-cell, single-cell transcriptomic analysis revealed higher mRNA expression of YWHAZ in β-cells from subjects with type 2 diabetes (47), and we have found that systemic overexpression of 14-3-3ζ was sufficient to reduce β-cell secretory function in mice (9). The exact mechanisms of how changes in 14-3-3ζ function affect the development of obesity or β-cell dysfunction are not known, but in-depth examination of the interactome, in addition to how 14-3-3ζ may influence the generation of splice variants, in the context of both conditions may yield novel biological insight as to how 14-3-3ζ influences the development of either disease. This approach has already been useful in understanding how changes in 14-3-3ϵ or 14-3-3σ expression promote the development of various forms of cancer and the identification of novel therapeutic targets (48, 49).

In conclusion, this study provides compelling evidence demonstrating the usefulness of elucidating the interactome of 14-3-3ζ as a means to identify novel factors required for adipogenesis. Additionally, a systematic investigation of interacting partners may also provide insight as to which physiological processes are essential for 14-3-3ζ–mediated adipocyte differentiation. Lastly, deciphering how various disease states influence the interactome of 14-3-3 proteins may also aid in the discovery of novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of chronic diseases, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes.

Experimental procedures

Generation of TAP–14-3-3ζ MEFs and cell culture

All animal procedures were approved and conducted in accordance with guidelines set by the University of British Columbia Animal Care Council. Embryos at embryonic day 13.5 were harvested from pregnant transgenic mice overexpressing a TAP-epitope–tagged 14-3-3ζ molecule (4), and MEFs were generated according to established protocols. 3T3-L1 cells (between passages 11 and 17) and MEFs were maintained in 25 mm glucose DMEM, supplemented with 10% newborn calf serum or fetal bovine serum, respectively, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Differentiation of MEFs and 3T3-L1 cells was induced with DMEM, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 172 nm insulin, 500 μm isobutylmethylxanthine, and 500 nm dexamethasone (MDI). Differentiation medium for MEFs was further supplemented with rosiglitazone (Sigma–Aldrich). Following incubation with differentiation medium for 2 days, the medium was replaced every 2 days with 25 mm glucose DMEM, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 172 nm insulin. Differentiation was assessed by Oil Red-O incorporation (Sigma–Aldrich), as previously described (4). To inhibit pre-mRNA processing, 3T3-L1 cells were incubated with the spliceosome inhibitor, madrasin (Sigma–Aldrich), during incubation with differentiation medium (25).

Mass spectrometry

Equal amounts of cell lysates from undifferentiated and differentiated TAP–14-3-3ζ MEFs were subjected to an overnight incubation with IgG coupled to protein G beads (ThermoFisher Scientific) in radioimmune precipitation assay buffer. Bound proteins from each pulldown were eluted with 1× SDS sample buffer without reducing agents and separated by SDS-PAGE prior to in-gel digestion (50). For each sample, peptides from three fractions (<50 kDa, >50 kDa, and IgG bands) were then purified on C-18 stage tips (51) and analyzed using a LTQ-Orbitrap Velos (ThermoFisher Scientific) as previously described (52). The data were processed with Proteome Discoverer v. 1.2 (ThermoFisher Scientific) followed by a Mascot analysis (2.3.0; Matrix Science, Boston, MA) using the Uniprot-Swissprot_mouse protein database (05302013, 540261 protein sequences). Only proteins with at least two peptides (false positive discovery rate ≤ 1%) in one of the two samples were retained. Two independent pulldowns were used for MS and proteomic analysis. The proteins were analyzed with String-Db to categorize them based on their biological processes (17).

siRNA-mediated knockdown, RNA isolation, and quantitative PCR

3T3-L1 cells were seeded at a density of 75,000/well prior to transfection with control siRNA or two independent target-specific Silencer Select siRNA 1 or 2 (ThermoFisher Scientific). Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine RNAimax, as per manufacturer instructions (ThermoFisher Scientific), at a final siRNA concentration of 20 μm per well. Total RNA was isolated from 3T3-L1 adipocytes or MEFs with the RNEasy kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, Canada). Synthesis of cDNA was performed with the qScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Quanta Biosciences, Gaithersburg, MD), and transcript levels were measured with SYBR green chemistry or TaqMan assays on a QuantStudio 6-flex real-time PCR system (ThermoFisher Scientific). All data were normalized to Hprt by the 2−ΔCt method, as previously described (4, 9, 35). All sequences of primers, TaqMan assays, and siRNAs can be found in Table S1. Confirmation that 14-3-3ζ knockdown had no effect of global RNA transcription was determined using the Click-iT RNA Alexa 488 imaging kit, as per the manufacturer's instructions (ThermoFisher Scientific).

Analysis of differential exon usage

To understand how adipocyte differentiation and depletion of 14-3-3ζ affected alternative splicing of mRNA, differential exon usage via DEXSeq was used as a surrogate measurement (30). Our previous transcriptomic data (GEO accession code GSE60745) were aligned to the mouse genome (Ensembl NCBIM37) via Tophat (v. 2.1.1). The number of reads mapping to a particular exon were compared with the total number of exons in a given gene and expressed as fragments per kilobase per million mapped reads (30). A false discovery rate of 0.05 was used to filter results. This data set was also analyzed to examined how depletion of 14-3-3ζ or differentiation affects the expression profile of target genes. Genes identified by DEXSeq were subjected to gene ontology analysis to categorize genes by biological function (53). Analysis of Lpin1 splicing was performed by RT-PCR, as described previously (32). PCR products were resolved on an agarose gel, followed by densitometric analysis of splice variants by ImageJ (31). Analysis of Pparg splicing was measured by quantitative PCR, using previously reported primer sequences against Pparg1, Pparg2, and Pparg1sv (29).

Immunoblotting

The cells were lysed in radioimmune precipitation assay (RIPA) buffer, supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors, as previously described (4). Immunoprecipitation was performed on whole cell lysates from 3T3-L1 adipocytes at different stages of differentiation with established protocols (35). Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes, and probed with antibodies against 14-3-3ζ, Pparγ, Lipin-1, and β-actin (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA).

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed by one- or two-way analysis of variance, followed by appropriate post hoc tests or by Student's t test. The data were considered significant when p < 0.05 and when applicable displayed as means ± S.D.

Author contributions

Y. M. performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote and reviewed the manuscript. M. S. and N. N. F. performed experiments and analyzed data. T. M. designed parts of the study and reviewed the manuscript. G. E. L. performed experiments, analyzed data, wrote the manuscript, and is responsible for the integrity of this work.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

We thank François Harvey in the Bioinformatics platform at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal for bioinformatics support and Dr. James D. Johnson (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada) for critical reading of this manuscript.

This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Grant PJT-153144 (to G. E. L.). This work was supported in part by postdoctoral fellowships from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) and the Canadian Diabetes Association (to G. E. L.). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

This article contains Table S1 and Figs. S1–S4.

3
The abbreviations used are:
MEF
mouse embryonic fibroblast
siCon
control siRNA
TAP
tandem affinity purification.

References

  • 1. Rosen E. D., and MacDougald O. A. (2006) Adipocyte differentiation from the inside out. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 885–896 10.1038/nrm2066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Cristancho A. G., and Lazar M. A. (2011) Forming functional fat: a growing understanding of adipocyte differentiation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 722–734 10.1038/nrm3198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Scott J. D., and Pawson T. (2009) Cell signaling in space and time: where proteins come together and when they're apart. Science 326, 1220–1224 10.1126/science.1175668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lim G. E., Albrecht T., Piske M., Sarai K., Lee J. T., Ramshaw H. S., Sinha S., Guthridge M. A., Acker-Palmer A., Lopez A. F., Clee S. M., Nislow C., and Johnson J. D. (2015) 14-3-3ζ coordinates adipogenesis of visceral fat. Nat. Commun. 6, 7671 10.1038/ncomms8671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Brunet A., Kanai F., Stehn J., Xu J., Sarbassova D., Frangioni J. V., Dalal S. N., DeCaprio J. A., Greenberg M. E., and Yaffe M. B. (2002) 14-3-3 transits to the nucleus and participates in dynamic nucleocytoplasmic transport. J. Cell Biol. 156, 817–828 10.1083/jcb.200112059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Feige J. N., and Auwerx J. (2007) Transcriptional coregulators in the control of energy homeostasis. Trends Cell Biol. 17, 292–301 10.1016/j.tcb.2007.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Nakae J., Kitamura T., Kitamura Y., Biggs W. H. 3rd, Arden K. C., and Accili D. (2003) The forkhead transcription factor Foxo1 regulates adipocyte differentiation. Dev. Cell 4, 119–129 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00401-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lim G. E., and Johnson J. D. (2016) 14-3-3zeta: A numbers game in adipocyte function? Adipocyte 5, 232–237 10.1080/21623945.2015.1120913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lim G. E., Piske M., Lulo J. E., Ramshaw H. S., Lopez A. F., and Johnson J. D. (2016) Ywhaz/14-3-3ζ deletion improves glucose tolerance through a GLP-1-dependent mechanism. Endocrinology 157, 2649–2659 10.1210/en.2016-1016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pozuelo Rubio M., Geraghty K. M., Wong B. H., Wood N. T., Campbell D. G., Morrice N., and Mackintosh C. (2004) 14-3-3-affinity purification of over 200 human phosphoproteins reveals new links to regulation of cellular metabolism, proliferation and trafficking. Biochem. J. 379, 395–408 10.1042/bj20031797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Chen S., Synowsky S., Tinti M., and MacKintosh C. (2011) The capture of phosphoproteins by 14-3-3 proteins mediates actions of insulin. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 22, 429–436 10.1016/j.tem.2011.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Siersbæk R., Nielsen R., John S., Sung M. H., Baek S., Loft A., Hager G. L., and Mandrup S. (2011) Extensive chromatin remodelling and establishment of transcription factor “hotspots” during early adipogenesis. EMBO J. 30, 1459–1472 10.1038/emboj.2011.65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Siersbæk R., Rabiee A., Nielsen R., Sidoli S., Traynor S., Loft A., Poulsen L. C., Rogowska-Wrzesinska A., Jensen O. N., and Mandrup S. (2014) Transcription factor cooperativity in early adipogenic hotspots and super-enhancers. Cell Rep. 7, 1443–1455 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.04.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Johnson C., Tinti M., Wood N. T., Campbell D. G., Toth R., Dubois F., Geraghty K. M., Wong B. H., Brown L. J., Tyler J., Gernez A., Chen S., Synowsky S., and MacKintosh C. (2011) Visualization and biochemical analyses of the emerging mammalian 14-3-3-phosphoproteome. Mol. Cell Proteomics 10, M110.005751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Mackintosh C. (2004) Dynamic interactions between 14-3-3 proteins and phosphoproteins regulate diverse cellular processes. Biochem. J. 381, 329–342 10.1042/BJ20031332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Li Y. (2010) Commonly used tag combinations for tandem affinity purification. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 55, 73–83 10.1042/BA20090273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Szklarczyk D., Morris J. H., Cook H., Kuhn M., Wyder S., Simonovic M., Santos A., Doncheva N. T., Roth A., Bork P., Jensen L. J., and von Mering C. (2017) The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D362–D368 10.1093/nar/gkw937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Liu D., Lin Y., Kang T., Huang B., Xu W., Garcia-Barrio M., Olatinwo M., Matthews R., Chen Y. E., and Thompson W. E. (2012) Mitochondrial dysfunction and adipogenic reduction by prohibitin silencing in 3T3-L1 cells. PLoS One 7, e34315 10.1371/journal.pone.0034315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ande S. R., Nguyen K. H., Padilla-Meier G. P., Wahida W., Nyomba B. L., and Mishra S. (2014) Prohibitin overexpression in adipocytes induces mitochondrial biogenesis, leads to obesity development, and affects glucose homeostasis in a sex-specific manner. Diabetes 63, 3734–3741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ding S. Y., Lee M. J., Summer R., Liu L., Fried S. K., and Pilch P. F. (2014) Pleiotropic effects of cavin-1 deficiency on lipid metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 8473–8483 10.1074/jbc.M113.546242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Perez-Diaz S., Johnson L. A., DeKroon R. M., Moreno-Navarrete J. M., Alzate O., Fernandez-Real J. M., Maeda N., and Arbones-Mainar J. M. (2014) Polymerase I and transcript release factor (PTRF) regulates adipocyte differentiation and determines adipose tissue expandability. FASEB J. 28, 3769–3779 10.1096/fj.14-251165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. McLennan Y., Polussa J., Tassone F., and Hagerman R. (2011) Fragile x syndrome. Curr. Genomics 12, 216–224 10.2174/138920211795677886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Brasaemle D. L., Dolios G., Shapiro L., and Wang R. (2004) Proteomic analysis of proteins associated with lipid droplets of basal and lipolytically stimulated 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 46835–46842 10.1074/jbc.M409340200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wahl M. C., Will C. L., and Lührmann R. (2009) The spliceosome: design principles of a dynamic RNP machine. Cell 136, 701–718 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Pawellek A., McElroy S., Samatov T., Mitchell L., Woodland A., Ryder U., Gray D., Lührmann R., and Lamond A. I. (2014) Identification of small molecule inhibitors of pre-mRNA splicing. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 34683–34698 10.1074/jbc.M114.590976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Zhu Y., Qi C., Korenberg J. R., Chen X. N., Noya D., Rao M. S., and Reddy J. K. (1995) Structural organization of mouse peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (mPPAR γ) gene: alternative promoter use and different splicing yield two mPPARγ isoforms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 7921–7925 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Tontonoz P., Hu E., Graves R. A., Budavari A. I., and Spiegelman B. M. (1994) mPPARγ2: tissue-specific regulator of an adipocyte enhancer. Genes Dev. 8, 1224–1234 10.1101/gad.8.10.1224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Fajas L., Auboeuf D., Raspé E., Schoonjans K., Lefebvre A. M., Saladin R., Najib J., Laville M., Fruchart J. C., Deeb S., Vidal-Puig A., Flier J., Briggs M. R., Staels B., Vidal H., et al. (1997) The organization, promoter analysis, and expression of the human PPARγ gene. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 18779–18789 10.1074/jbc.272.30.18779 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Takenaka Y., Inoue I., Nakano T., Shinoda Y., Ikeda M., Awata T., and Katayama S. (2013) A novel splicing variant of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (Pparγ1sv) cooperatively regulates adipocyte differentiation with Pparγ2. PLoS One 8, e65583 10.1371/journal.pone.0065583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Anders S., Reyes A., and Huber W. (2012) Detecting differential usage of exons from RNA-seq data. Genome Res. 22, 2008–2017 10.1101/gr.133744.111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Schneider C. A., Rasband W. S., and Eliceiri K. W. (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 10.1038/nmeth.2089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Péterfy M., Phan J., and Reue K. (2005) Alternatively spliced lipin isoforms exhibit distinct expression pattern, subcellular localization, and role in adipogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 32883–32889 10.1074/jbc.M503885200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Li H., Cheng Y., Wu W., Liu Y., Wei N., Feng X., Xie Z., and Feng Y. (2014) SRSF10 regulates alternative splicing and is required for adipocyte differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34, 2198–2207 10.1128/MCB.01674-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Vernia S., Edwards Y. J., Han M. S., Cavanagh-Kyros J., Barrett T., Kim J. K., and Davis R. J. (2016) An alternative splicing program promotes adipose tissue thermogenesis. eLife 5, e17672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lim G. E., Piske M., and Johnson J. D. (2013) 14-3-3 proteins are essential signalling hubs for beta cell survival. Diabetologia 56, 825–837 10.1007/s00125-012-2820-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Knott G. J., Bond C. S., and Fox A. H. (2016) The DBHS proteins SFPQ, NONO and PSPC1: a multipurpose molecular scaffold. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 3989–4004 10.1093/nar/gkw271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kowalska E., Ripperger J. A., Hoegger D. C., Bruegger P., Buch T., Birchler T., Mueller A., Albrecht U., Contaldo C., and Brown S. A. (2013) NONO couples the circadian clock to the cell cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 1592–1599 10.1073/pnas.1213317110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Wang J., Rajbhandari P., Damianov A., Han A., Sallam T., Waki H., Villanueva C. J., Lee S. D., Nielsen R., Mandrup S., Reue K., Young S. G., Whitelegge J., Saez E., Black D. L., et al. (2017) RNA-binding protein PSPC1 promotes the differentiation-dependent nuclear export of adipocyte RNAs. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 987–1004 10.1172/JCI89484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Li S., Li Z., Shu F. J., Xiong H., Phillips A. C., and Dynan W. S. (2014) Double-strand break repair deficiency in NONO knockout murine embryonic fibroblasts and compensation by spontaneous upregulation of the PSPC1 paralog. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 9771–9780 10.1093/nar/gku650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Chaudhury A., Chander P., and Howe P. H. (2010) Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) in cellular processes: focus on hnRNP E1's multifunctional regulatory roles. RNA 16, 1449–1462 10.1261/rna.2254110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Dreyfuss G., Kim V. N., and Kataoka N. (2002) Messenger-RNA-binding proteins and the messages they carry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 195–205 10.1038/nrm760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Nilsen T. W., and Graveley B. R. (2010) Expansion of the eukaryotic proteome by alternative splicing. Nature 463, 457–463 10.1038/nature08909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Lin J. C. (2015) Impacts of alternative splicing events on the differentiation of adipocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 22169–22189 10.3390/ijms160922169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Mei B., Zhao L., Chen L., and Sul H. S. (2002) Only the large soluble form of preadipocyte factor-1 (Pref-1), but not the small soluble and membrane forms, inhibits adipocyte differentiation: role of alternative splicing. Biochem. J. 364, 137–144 10.1042/bj3640137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Capobianco V., Nardelli C., Ferrigno M., Iaffaldano L., Pilone V., Forestieri P., Zambrano N., and Sacchetti L. (2012) miRNA and protein expression profiles of visceral adipose tissue reveal miR-141/YWHAG and miR-520e/RAB11A as two potential miRNA/protein target pairs associated with severe obesity. J. Proteome Res. 11, 3358–3369 10.1021/pr300152z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Insenser M., Montes-Nieto R., Vilarrasa N., Lecube A., Simó R., Vendrell J., and Escobar-Morreale H. F. (2012) A nontargeted proteomic approach to the study of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in human obesity. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 363, 10–19 10.1016/j.mce.2012.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Segerstolpe Å., Palasantza A., Eliasson P., Andersson E. M., Andréasson A. C., Sun X., Picelli S., Sabirsh A., Clausen M., Bjursell M. K., Smith D. M., Kasper M., Ämmälä C., and Sandberg R. (2016) Single-cell transcriptome profiling of human pancreatic islets in health and type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. 24, 593–607 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Tang S., Bao H., Zhang Y., Yao J., Yang P., and Chen X. (2013) 14-3-3ϵ mediates the cell fate decision-making pathways in response of hepatocellular carcinoma to Bleomycin-induced DNA damage. PLoS One 8, e55268 10.1371/journal.pone.0055268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Benzinger A., Muster N., Koch H. B., Yates J. R. 3rd, Hermeking H. (2005) Targeted proteomic analysis of 14-3-3 sigma, a p53 effector commonly silenced in cancer. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4, 785–795 10.1074/mcp.M500021-MCP200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Shevchenko A., Chernushevich I., Wilm M., and Mann M. (2000) De novo peptide sequencing by nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry using triple quadrupole and quadrupole/time-of-flight instruments. Methods Mol. Biol. 146, 1–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Rappsilber J., Mann M., and Ishihama Y. (2007) Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1896–1906 10.1038/nprot.2007.261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Ng A. H., Fang N. N., Comyn S. A., Gsponer J., and Mayor T. (2013) System-wide analysis reveals intrinsically disordered proteins are prone to ubiquitylation after misfolding stress. Mol. Cell Proteomics 12, 2456–2467 10.1074/mcp.M112.023416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Carbon S., Ireland A., Mungall C. J., Shu S., Marshall B., Lewis S., AmiGO Hub, and Web Presence Working Group (2009) AmiGO: online access to ontology and annotation data. Bioinformatics 25, 288–289 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES