Abstract
Introduction
Mycoplasma gallisepticum is considered the most pathogenic and economically significant avian Mycoplasma spp. for the worldwide poultry industry. The aim of this study was to develop a novel and sensitive real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay based on the amplification of its mgc2 gene sequence for its rapid molecular detection in poultry.
Material and Methods
Blood samples from 300 broiler and layer chickens were screened using a rapid serum agglutination (RSA) test. A real-time LAMP reaction was conducted with seropositive swab samples at 60ºC for 90 min in an ESEQuant tube scanner using 6-carboxyfluorescein as the reporting dye.
Results
The sensitivity of the developed assay was 10 fg/µL of DNA. The assay was found 100% specific, showing no cross-reactivity with other avian Mycoplasma species. The proportion found of the positive samples by the real-time LAMP was 58%. In comparison, the RSA was found to detect 52% of positive cases.
Conclusion
The mgc2 real-time LAMP emerged as a more sensitive and accurate method for molecular detection of M. gallisepticum than RSA. Robustness and precision give it applicability as a potential field diagnostic tool for M. gallisepticum control. The study will be beneficial in reducing economic losses that M. gallisepticum inflicts on the poultry industry. This is the first reported development of a real-time LAMP assay based on the amplification of the mgc2 gene sequence using an ESEQuant tube scanner for galline M. gallisepticum detection.
Keywords: poultry, Mycoplasma gallisepticum, real-time LAMP, mgc2 gene
Introduction
Mycoplasma gallisepticum is still considered the most pathogenic and economically significant Mycoplasma spp. for the worldwide poultry industry (4). M. gallisepticum infection is commonly known as chronic respiratory disease (CRD) in avian species (11). Timely monitoring and rapid diagnosis are the most crucial steps in prevention and control of M. gallisepticum infection. Culture isolation, serological assays, and molecular detection methods (PCR, real-time PCR, and nested PCR) have been applied for the diagnosis of avian mycoplasmas for decades (3, 18). However, these methods are expensive and require an extended period of time to detect the infection (2). Real-time PCR is rapid but sophisticated equipment and a well-established laboratory are necessary for this technique (5). The loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay has emerged as an affordable and rapid molecular diagnostic technique (6, 12). This isothermal technology does not require specialised and expensive instrumentation for amplification or for post amplification procedures; thus is able to obviate the limitations associated with PCR (1, 9). A LAMP reaction takes place under isothermal conditions of 60–65ºC with high strand displacement activity performed by Bst or Bsm DNA polymerase (19). It uses four or six primers (two inner, two outer, or two loop primers) recognising six or eight specific sequences on the target DNA. Inner primers are FIP (forward inner primer) and BIP (backward inner primer), outer primers are F3 (forward outer primer) and B3 (backward outer primer), and loop primers consist of FL (forward loop) and BL (backward loop) primers (6, 17).
Here, we have presented a novel and sensitive real-time LAMP assay using an ESEQuant tube scanner (Qiagen, Germany) for rapid molecular detection of M. gallisepticum. The scanner is a rapid fluorescence measurement system for real-time detection of pathogens. The device has an eight-tube holder and an LCD panel to show the positive and negative results. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on development of a real-time LAMP assay based on the amplification of mgc2 gene sequence for the detection of M. gallisepticum in chickens.
Material and Methods
Rapid serum agglutination test
Commercially available stained M. gallisepticum antigen (SPAFAS M. gallisepticum Plate Antigen, Charles River Laboratories, USA) was used for initial screening of serum samples. M. gallisepticum reagent serum (Charles River Laboratories) served as the control positive serum. A rapid serum agglutination (RSA) test was performed (14) to screen 300 sera samples which were collected from commercial broiler and layer flocks.
Field samples and reference strains
Seropositive tracheal and nasal swab samples (n = 156) were collected from chickens of commercial broiler and layer flocks. DNA of reference species of avian Mycoplasma(M. synoviae, M. gallisepticum, and M. imitans) on Indicating FTA Classic cards (Whatman, USA) procured from the Poultry Diagnostic and Research Center (PDRC), University of Georgia, USA, was used to evaluate the specificity of the assay (Table 1).
Table 1.
Reference strains of Mycoplasma spp. used in the study
| Name | Strain | Origin |
|---|---|---|
| Mycoplasma gallisepticum | A5969 | PDRC |
| Mycoplasma synoviae | F10-2AS | PDRC |
| Mycoplasma imitans | 4229 | PDRC |
DNA extraction
The swab samples were processed directly for genomic DNA extraction through a phenol-chloroform extraction method as previously described (16). DNA of reference strains was purified from Indicating FTA Classic cards as previously reported (10).
Primer design for real-time LAMP
A set of four LAMP primers was designed targeting the mgc2 gene sequence of M. gallisepticum strain K4669ATK98 (GenBank accession number: AY556303). The primers consisting of two outer (F3 and B3) and two inner (FIP and BIP) primers were generated online by Primer Explorer V 5 software (https://primerexplorer.jp/lampv5/) (Fujitsu, Japan). The names and sequences of designed primers are detailed in Table 2. Their location within the mgc2 gene sequence of M. gallisepticum is shown in Fig. 1. The theoretical specificity of all primers was analysed using the NCBI BLAST search tool (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/). Primer purity was also kept under consideration and in this regard additional purification of the FIP and BIP primers was carried out using a reverse phase cartridge (RPC), (Gene Link, USA).
Table 2.
Designed real-time LAMP primers targeting mgc2 gene sequence of M. gallisepticum
| Primer Name | Sequence (5–3′) | Length |
|---|---|---|
| F3 | AAGCGATTGAGCCAACTG | 18 |
| FIP (F1c-F2) | GATCCCTATCTGAGGGTTATTAGCT-CTGAAGAAGTTAATACTCAAGAACC | 50 |
| B3 | TAAACCCTGGTCGCATTC | 18 |
| BIP (B1c-B2) | ACCTCAGATTAATCCGCAATTTGGT-TTGGTTAGGTGGCATTGG | 43 |
Fig. 1.
LAMP primer location sites in mgc2 nucleotide sequence of M. gallisepticum. FIP consisted of F1c (complementary sequence of F1) and F2 sequence. BIP comprised B1c (complementary sequence of B1) and B2 sequence. Forward and backward outer primers are F3 and B3
Reaction conditions for real-time LAMP
The real-time LAMP reaction was carried out in an ESEQuant tube scanner (V 2.7.5) (Qiagen, Germany) with 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) as the reporting dye, as previously described for M. mycoides (8). The reaction with a total volume of 25 µL per tube was conducted using an experimental DNA amplification kit with Bsm DNA polymerase (Cat. no. V0524, Thermo Scientific, USA). The reaction mixture contained Isothermal MasterMix, 40 pmol each of FIP and BIP primers, 5 pmol each of F3 and B3 primers, and 1 µL of template DNA. The reaction mixture was incubated from 55ºC to 65ºC for different duration times from 30 to 90 min in the ESEQuant tube scanner and fluorescence signals were recorded using FAM (13). The tubes were heated at 80ºC for 5 min to terminate the reaction.
Confirmation of LAMP amplified products
The amplified products of LAMP were analysed by gel electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel, stained with 0.5 µg/mL of ethidium bromide. The GeneRuler 50-bp DNA ladder (Cat no. SM0373, Fermentas, USA) was incorporated as standard. The reaction solutions of 5 µL along with 6x loading dye were subjected to electrophoresis at 90 V for 1 h. After electrophoresis, the gel was visualised using a gel documentation system (DigiGenius, Syngene, UK) under UV light (7).
Results
Rapid serum agglutination test
The overall prevalence of M. gallisepticum in serologically tested broiler and layer chickens was 52% (156/300), as detailed in Table 3.
Table 3.
Distribution of samples for M. gallisepticum screened with RSA and confirmed through real-time LAMP assay from broiler and layer flocks
| Flock | Number of samples | RSA positive samples | Real-time LAMP positive samples (out of RSA positive samples) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 40 | 23 | 10 |
| B | 36 | 19 | 13 |
| C | 37 | 21 | 11 |
| D | 33 | 15 | 10 |
| E | 39 | 30 | 16 |
| F | 41 | 11 | 05 |
| G | 35 | 18 | 18 |
| H | 39 | 19 | 07 |
| Total number | 300 | 156 | 90 |
| % | - | 52 | 58 |
Evaluation of LAMP amplified products
Overall 58% (90/156) field samples (tracheal and nasal swabs) were detected as positive by the real-time LAMP assay (Table 3). Amplification curves were obtained through the ESEQuant tube scanner in the case of positive samples. No amplification was seen with M. synoviae or M. imitans (negative controls), nor with the no template control (NTC) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Amplification curves of M. gallisepticum-positive samples detected through mgc2– gene-based real-time LAMP. M. synoviae, M. imitans, and NTC were not amplified
Real-time LAMP optimisation
To determine the optimum reaction conditions of real-time LAMP, its reaction mixtures were incubated from 55ºC to 65ºC for 30, 45, 60, and 90 min. The reaction temperature of 60ºC was considered the optimal temperature, and the optimal duration time of the LAMP reaction was found to be 90 min. After 90 min, no effect on the final amplification was observed.
Real-time LAMP sensitivity
To evaluate the sensitivity of the developed real-time LAMP assay, genomic DNA of M. gallisepticum was tested in 10-fold serial dilutions from 1 pg/µL to 1 fg/µL. The lowest detection limit of the LAMP assay was recorded as 10 fg/µL of DNA (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

Sensitivity of real-time LAMP by serial 10-fold dilutions of M. gallisepticum DNA
Real-time LAMP specificity
In order to evaluate the specificity of the LAMP assay, it was performed with genomic DNA templates of two other species of Mycoplasma (M. synoviae and M. imitans). At optimum conditions, no amplification was observed in the cases of both other species of Mycoplasma and NTC, showing the 100% specificity of the developed assay (Fig. 2).
Confirmation of LAMP amplified products
The amplified products of the successful LAMP assay were detected by demonstration of a specific ladder-like pattern on electrophoresed gel. Negative controls did not show any amplified product on the gel (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.

Positive samples of M. gallisepticum on agarose gel after gel electrophoresis. Lane M – Gene Ruler 50-bp DNA ladder; Lanes 4, 5, and 6 – M. gallisepticum positive samples; Lane 1 – MS; Lane 2 – MIM; Lane 3 – negative reagent sample
Comparison of real-time LAMP and RSA tests
The proportion of the positive samples detected by real-time LAMP was 58%. In comparison, the performed RSA was found to detect 52% of the positive cases. Therefore, the LAMP assay has been proved the more sensitive and confirmatory test for molecular detection of M. gallisepticum in poultry.
Discussion
Rapid diagnosis of Mycoplasma gallisepticum is required for its effective control. Sensitive and reliable molecular diagnostic methods based on real-time PCR are available for the detection of the bacteria in surveillance and control programmes, and preferred over serological assays, but are expensive and not applicable to field conditions. The high specificity, rapidity, and efficiency of the LAMP assay persuaded us to establish real-time LAMP-based detection of M. gallisepticum. Although LAMP technology has been developed for the diagnosis of a range of pathogens, its application in the detection of avian mycoplasmas is very limited. Recently, Zhang et al. (19) reported a conventional LAMP assay for M. gallisepticum targeting a conserved region of the pdhA gene. But so far there has been no report on real-time LAMP based detection of the bacterium in poultry. In the present study, we developed a real-time LAMP assay based on the amplification of the mgc2 gene sequence for the detection of M. gallisepticum, using an ESEQuant tube scanner with FAM dye. We designed the primers to target the mgc2 gene of M. gallisepticum, which is a very apt gene to amplify the genome of M. gallisepticum, whereas in a previously reported conventional LAMP (19), primers were designed from a conserved gene region (pdhA) of the bacterium. In the current study, the primers were synthesised over a 200 nmol scale and subjected to additional purification through a reverse phase cartridge (RPC) (15). The RPC purification method provides 85%–95% purity of the oligonucleotides (Gene Link, USA) and thus makes the assay more accurate. To confirm the specificity of the newly designed primers, DNA templates of other non-target Mycoplasma spp. were also used, including the genetically closely related Mycoplasma imitans. The LAMP technique successfully distinguished between M. gallisepticum and other species of Mycoplasma, as the assay revealed its inability to produce amplified products from Mycoplasma spp. other than M. gallisepticum, thus confirming that the primers designed in this study are highly specific for M. gallisepticum.
Mycoplasmas are fastidious organisms and take a long period of incubation (7–21 days) to culture. So, LAMP-based detection following prior cultivation of the organism is not applicable for on-site field and point-of-care testing. Therefore, we amplified the target DNA directly from swab samples, whereas in a previously reported conventional LAMP assay (19), it was amplified using culture isolates. The designed primer set in this study successfully amplified the target sequence of M. gallisepticum from swab samples, thus making the assay lesslaborious and lesstedious. In the present study, the use of an ESEQuant tube scanner proved fit for the purpose of rapid molecular diagnosis of infection at any location (point-of-care or field site) because this small and easy-to-use device is portable enough to carry into remote field areas. While the sophisticated thermal cycler requires a standard laboratory set up, the real-time LAMP using the tube scanner gave us the positive and negative results on the spot via the fluorescence signals in the form of amplification curves. We additionally confirmed the amplified products through gel electrophoresis. The use of lyophilised MasterMix and primer mix made the assay more suitable for field conditions, because these ready mixes saved time and avoided errors. Moreover, the lyophilised MasterMix is thermostable for at least one year and so imposes no need for storage in the refrigerator. The percentage of the positive samples detected through real-time LAMP was 58%, and this percentage was higher than that of RSA (53%). RSA is also associated with false positive results, so the real-time LAMP served as a confirmatory test for the detection of M. gallisepticum. In this way, the newly developed real-time LAMP assay significantly improved the efficiency of M. gallisepticum detection in poultry.
In conclusion, the present LAMP assay is more sensitive, 100% specific, rapid, and culture-free technology for the molecular detection of M. gallisepticum in poultry. Moreover, the LAMP assay using an ESEQuant tube scanner has proved its potential for the real-time molecular detection of M. gallisepticum. This promising technique is applicable in M. gallisepticum control and eradication programmes. This is the first report on real-time LAMP based detection of M. gallisepticum. It recommends itself highly for precise and robust point-of-care testing for M. gallisepticum under field conditions. The study will be beneficial in reducing the economic losses caused by M. gallisepticum in the poultry industry. This novel and exciting molecular technique introduces simplicity lacked by previously reported molecular methods for the detection of M. gallisepticum in chickens.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Naola Ferguson-Noel from the Poultry Diagnostic and Research Centre (University of Georgia, Athens, USA) for providing the DNA of reference strains of avian mycoplasma species.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interests Statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.
Financial Disclosure Statement: This work was financially supported by the International Foundation for Science (IFS), Stockholm, Sweden as a project entitled “Development of Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay: a simple and cost effective diagnostic test for the molecular detection of economically important Mycoplasma pathogens of chickens” (Grant Ref. Number. B/5365-1). The project was awarded to Dr. Syed Ehtisham-ul-Haque, Chief Investigator.
Animal Rights Statement: None required.
References
- 1.Aryan E., Makvandi M., Farajzadeh A., Huygen K., Bifani P., Mousavi S.L., Fateh A., Jelodar A., Gouya M.M., Romano M.. A novel and more sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay targeting IS6110 for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Microbiol Res. 2010;165:211–220. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2009.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ashraf W., Kamal H., Mobeen A., Waheed U., Unger H., Khan Q.. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid and sensitive detection of Peste des petits ruminants virus in field conditions. J Anim Plant Sci. 2017;27:119–127. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ehtisham-ul-Haque S., Rahman S., Khan M., Younus M., Awais M., Nasir A.. A simplified duplex real-time PCR incorporating TaqMan minor groove binder (MGB) probes and an exogenous internal positive control for the simultaneous detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae cultures. Vet Medicina. 2015;60:268–273. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Evans J., Thornton D., Branton S.. Diagnosis of Mycoplasma gallisepticum from a broiler breeder flock: comparison of three diagnostics methods. Int J Poul Sci. 2009;8:104–107. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Feberwee A., de Vries T.S.. Landman W.J.: Seroprevalence of Mycoplasma synoviae in Dutch commercial poultry farms. Avian Pathol. 2008;37:629–633. doi: 10.1080/03079450802484987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kursa O., Woźniakowski G., Tomczyk G., Sawicka A., Minta Z.. Rapid detection of Mycoplasma synoviae by loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Arch Microbiol. 2015;197:319–325. doi: 10.1007/s00203-014-1063-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liu T., Garcıa M., Levisohn S., Yogev D., Kleven S.. Molecular variability of the adhesin-encoding gene pvpA among Mycoplasma gallisepticum strains and its application in diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:1882–1888. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1882-1888.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mair G., Vilei E.M., Wade A., Frey J., Unger H.. Isothermal loop-mediated amplification (LAMP) for diagnosis of contagious bovine pleuro-pneumonia. BMC Vet Res. 2013;9:108. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mansour S.M., Ali H., Chase C.C., Cepica A.. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for diagnosis of 18 World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) notifiable viral diseases of ruminants, swine and poultry. Anim Health Res Rev. 2015;16:89–106. doi: 10.1017/S1466252315000018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Moscoso H., Thayer S.G., Hofacre C.L., Kleven S.H.. Inactivation, storage, and PCR detection of mycoplasma on FTA filter paper. Avian Dis. 2004;48:841–850. doi: 10.1637/7215-060104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nascimento E.R., Yamamoto R., Herrick K.R., Tait R.C.. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Avian Dis. 1991;35:62–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Notomi T., Okayama H., Masubuchi H., Yonekawa T., Watanabe K., Amino N., Hase T.. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:e63. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.12.e63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Peng J., Zhan Y., Zeng F., Long H., Pei Y., Guo J.. Development of a real-time fluorescence loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid and quantitative detection of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp . niveum in soil. FEMS Microbiol Letters. 2013;349:127–134. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sarkar S., Rahman M.B, Rahman M., Amin K.M.R., Khan M.F.R., Rahman M.,M.. Sero-prevalence of Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection of chickens in model breeder poultry farms of Bangladesh. Int J Poult Sci. 2005;4:32–35. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tomita N., Mori Y., Kanda H., Notomi T.. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of gene sequences and simple visual detection of products. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:877–882. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang H., Fadl A., Khan M.. Multiplex PCR for avian pathogenic mycoplasmas. Mol Cell Probes. 1997;11:211–216. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.1997.0108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wozniakowski G., Samorek-Salamonowicz E., Kozdrun W.. Rapid detection of Marek's disease virus in feather follicles by loop-mediated amplification. Avian Dis. 2011;55:462–467. doi: 10.1637/9668-012711-ResNote.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zain Z., Bradbury J.. The influence of type of swab and laboratory method on the recovery of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae in broth medium. Avian Pathol. 1995;24:707–716. doi: 10.1080/03079459508419109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang F., Bao S., Yu S., Cheng J., Tan L., Qiu X., Song C., Dai Y., Fei R., Ding C.. Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification targeting a gene within the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, the pdhA gene, for rapid detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2015;27:260–267. doi: 10.1177/1040638715584155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


