Abstract
We conducted a retrospective study of breast cancer survivors to determine risk factors for weight gain during endocrine therapy and the association of such weight gain with recurrence.
Background
Weight gain is a negative prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC) patients. Risk factors for weight gain during adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) and the extent to which such weight gain is associated with disease recurrence remain unclear.
Methods
We retrospectively identified a cohort of women diagnosed with stage I-III, hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative BC between January 1997 and August 2008, who had received initial treatment at MD Anderson, had completed 5 years of ET, and had remained free of locoregional or distant relapse or contralateral BC for ≥5 years after diagnosis. Weight change at the end of 5 years of ET was measured as the percent change of weight from the start of ET, and a weight gain of >5% was considered clinically significant. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the determinants of such weight gain and the risk of recurrence after 5 years.
Results
Among 1,282 long-term BC survivors, 432 (33.7%) had a weight gain of >5% after 5 years of ET. Women who were premenopausal at diagnosis were 1.40 times more likely than women who were postmenopausal at diagnosis to have a weight gain of >5%. Asian women had the lowest risk of gaining weight. The recurrence risks of patients who gained weight and those who did not were not significantly different.
Conclusions
Premenopausal BC patients had an increased risk of weight gain after 5 years of ET, but BC patients who had a weight gain of >5% did not have an increased risk of disease recurrence.
Keywords: weight gain, adjuvant endocrine therapy, disease recurrence, early-stage breast cancer
Introduction
Weight gain is prevalent among breast cancer (BC) survivors, with 50–96% of survivors reporting weight gain after a diagnosis of or during treatment for primary BC.1–8 Weight gain is considered to be a negative prognostic factor in BC patients.9,10 The public health implications of obesity and breast cancer are immense.11 Weight gain could possibly adversely affect survival among breast cancer survivors with an elevated risk of recurrence and mortality.12–16 Although several studies have assessed weight gain in BC survivors, the causal factors underlying such weight gain remain elusive. However, possible explanations include fatigue, reduced physical activity, and increased caloric intake associated with behavioral or treatment-related factors.17
Studies of the relationship between weight change and BC outcomes have yielded inconsistent findings.18–21 Different timings of the post-diagnostic weight change measures and the highly selected populations of patients with good prognosis are also likely to contribute to the varied findings. Most studies of weight gain in BC patients have assessed weight change during or after adjuvant chemotherapy.10, 22, 23 Predictors of weight gain after BC was analyzed in the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) study, a prospective randomized clinical trial that included BC patients within 4 years of their diagnosis with their weight recorded 1 year prior to diagnosis, at study enrollment and over a period of 6 years, which reported an association of weight gain with chemotherapy irrespective of the types or regimens, whereas tamoxifen was not significantly associated.23 Another study reported associations of weight gain after chemotherapy in patients with a younger age at diagnosis and with a premenopausal status24, supporting that there is weight gain with chemotherapy. However, the published data on weight gain determinants specifically during adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) are very limited.
The association of weight gain with BC recurrence is inconclusive.14, 25, 26A study that combined participants from the WHEL study and from the Life after Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) study suggested there was no increase in risk of disease in the first 5–7 years post diagnosis in early stage BC.21 However, the weight change was not specifically examined during ET. Therefore, the objectives of our study were to identify risk factors for weight gain specifically after 5 years of ET and to determine the extent to which such weight gain was associated with disease recurrence in long-term BC survivors.
Methods
Study Design and Patients
This retrospective study was performed with the approval of MD Anderson’s Institutional Review Board (PA13-0424). Using the Breast Cancer Management System database in the Department of Breast Medical Oncology at MD Anderson, we identified 1,282 women who were diagnosed with early stage (I-III), hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative BC between January 1997 and August 2008 and who received their initial treatment at MD Anderson to help diminish a selection bias.27 HR-positive tumors were those that were either estrogen receptor–positive or progesterone receptor–positive as determined by immunohistochemistry using institutional cut-offs. HER2 status had been assessed by immunohistochemistry or by fluorescence in situ hybridization when available and determined to be positive or negative on the basis of institutional cut-offs and guidelines that were current at the time of diagnosis. Patients self-reported their race at the time of registration. By inclusion criteria, all patients were 18–90 years old at diagnosis, had completed 5 years of ET, and were disease-free 5 years after diagnosis. Body mass index (BMI) was classified according to World Health Organization criteria.28 Underweight was defined as a BMI of <18.5 kg/m2; normal, 18.5–24.9 kg/m2; overweight, 25–29.9 kg/m2; and obese, >30 kg/m2. Menopausal status was recorded at the time of diagnosis and defined as pre-, peri-, or postmenopausal by the attending physician following guidelines that were current at the time of diagnosis29; women who were perimenopausal were grouped with women who were premenopausal. We excluded patients who had received any treatment for BC prior to their initial visit to MD Anderson, those who initiated ET more than 1 year after their diagnosis, those who had received ET prior to their BC diagnosis (e.g., for chemoprevention), those who had any disease recurrence within 5 years of diagnosis, those who had concurrent second primary cancers of any site, and those with missing demographic, tumor, and/or treatment details.
Outcomes of Interest
The two outcomes of interest of this study were weight gain specifically after 5 years of ET and recurrence-free survival (RFS).Weight change percentages were calculated as [(weight after ET – weight before ET)/weight before ET] × 100. A weight gain of >5% was considered clinically relevant, as this cut-off has been reported in previous studies aiming to improve health outcomes among overweight and obese individuals30–32 and because this value has been used to evaluate the effects of weight change in BC survivors.19, 21, 23, 33, 34 We reviewed patients’ charts to verify their weights assessed by direct measurement during clinic visits within 90 days of starting and ending ET. RFS was defined as the time from diagnosis to any locoregional recurrence (including invasive ipsilateral tumor and invasive locoregional tumor) or distant recurrence or death from any cause.35 Patients with no recurrence were censored at last follow-up.
Statistical Analysis
Univariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the crude association between weight change and patients’ demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics. Variables with p-values of <0.25 in the univariate analysis were included in a multivariable model.36, 37 Backward selection criteria were used to retain variables in the multivariable model using a 0.05 significance level. Owing to their clinical significance, chemotherapy, surgery, and ET were retained in the multivariable model regardless of whether they had p-values of <0.25 in the univariate analysis. A log-rank test was used to compare the survival probabilities of patients with a weight gain of >5% with those of patients with a weight change of ≤5%. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model with adjustment for other baseline covariates was used to evaluate the association between weight gain and RFS. P-values of <0.05 indicated statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and STATA version 12 (Statacorp, College Station, TX).
Results
Patient Characteristics
The selection of the patient population is depicted in Figure 1, and patient characteristics are provided in Table 1. The median follow-up time from the date of diagnosis was 11.2 years (quartile [Q] 1, 9.4; Q3, 13.3), and the median follow-up time from 5 years after diagnosis was 6.2 years (Q1, 4.4; Q3, 8.3). Among the 1,282 long-term BC survivors included in the study, 432 (33.7%) had a weight gain of >5%, and 850 (66.3%) had a weight change of ≤5%. In both groups, about 60% of patients were overweight or obese at diagnosis, and about 40% of patients had a normal weight at diagnosis. Patients who had a weight gain of >5% were younger than those with a weight change of ≤5%. Patients who had a weight gain of >5% were also more likely to be premenopausal at diagnosis. Overall, the two groups had similar race distributions; however, the group of patients who gained weight had a lower proportion of Asian women. Patients with stage II or III disease or grade 3 tumors were more likely to have a weight gain of >5% than patients with stage I disease or grade 1 or 2 tumors were. Tumor histology distribution did not differ significantly between the two groups. Compared with patients who had a weight change of ≤5%, patients who had a weight gain of >5% were more likely to have received chemotherapy, tamoxifen, or a sequential ET regimen and less likely to have received an AI. In terms of locoregional therapy, patients who gained weight were more likely than patients who did not gain weight to have undergone a mastectomy; the proportion of patients who received radiation therapy did not differ between the groups.
Figure 1.

Patient cohort selection.
Table 1.
Patient Characteristics by Weight Change
| Characteristics | All patients (n = 1,282) |
Patients with weight change ≤5% (n = 850) |
Patients with weight gain >5% (n = 432) |
P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis, years | <0.001 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 56.4 (11.0) | 57.5 (11.0) | 54.2 (11.7) | |
| Median (Q1-Q3) | 57.0 (49.0–64.0) | 58.0 (50.0–65.0) | 54.0 (47.0–62.0) | |
| BMI | 0.478 | |||
| Normal or underweight | 499 (38.9) | 325 (38.2) | 174 (40.3) | |
| Overweight or obese | 783 (61.1) | 525 (61.8) | 258 (59.7) | |
| Race | 0.060 | |||
| White | 977 (76.2) | 637 (74.9) | 340 (78.7) | |
| African American | 106 (8.3) | 72 (8.5) | 34 (7.9) | |
| Hispanic | 127 (9.9) | 82 (9.7) | 45 (10.4) | |
| Asian | 69 (5.4) | 57 (6.7) | 12 (2.8) | |
| Native American | 3 (0.2) | 2 (0.2) | 1 (0.2) | |
| Menopausal status | <0.001 | |||
| Postmenopausal | 979 (76.4) | 675 (79.4) | 304 (70.4) | |
| Premenopausal | 303 (23.6) | 175 (20.6) | 128 (29.6) | |
| Disease stage | 0.008 | |||
| I | 780 (60.8) | 539 (63.4) | 241 (55.8) | |
| II or III | 502 (39.2) | 311 (36.6) | 191 (44.2) | |
| Tumor grade | 0.017 | |||
| I | 137 (10.7) | 103 (12.1) | 34 (7.9) | |
| II | 806 (62.9) | 538 (63.3) | 268 (62.0) | |
| III | 339 (26.4) | 209 (24.6) | 130 (30.1) | |
| Histology | 0.069 | |||
| Ductal | 957 (74.6) | 631 (74.2) | 326 (75.5) | |
| Lobular | 128 (10.0) | 90 (10.6) | 38 (8.8) | |
| Mixed | 125 (9.8) | 74 (8.7) | 51 (11.8) | |
| Other* | 72 (5.6) | 55 (6.5) | 17 (3.9) | |
| Chemotherapy | 702 (54.8) | 443 (52.1) | 259 (60.0) | 0.008 |
| Endocrine therapy | <0.001 | |||
| T | 392 (30.6) | 251 (29.5) | 141 (32.6) | |
| AI | 662 (51.8) | 469 (55.2) | 193 (44.7) | |
| Sequential AI and T | 228 (17.8) | 130 (15.3) | 98 (22.7) | |
| Radiation therapy | 869 (67.8) | 582 (68.5) | 287 (66.4) | 0.461 |
| Surgery | 0.021 | |||
| Lumpectomy | 696 (54.3) | 481 (56.6) | 215 (49.8) | |
| Mastectomy | 586 (45.7) | 369 (43.4) | 217 (50.2) |
NOTE: Data are no. of patients (%) unless otherwise indicated.
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; Q1, quartile 1; Q3, quartile 3; BMI, body mass index; T, tamoxifen; AI, aromatase inhibitor.
Other histologies were invasive mucinous and invasive tubular.
Univariate Analysis for Associations between Patient Characteristics and Weight Change
The results of the univariate analysis are given in Table 2. Premenopausal status, stage II or III disease, grade 3 tumor, and chemotherapy increased the likelihood of a weight gain of >5%. Although both age and menopausal status at diagnosis were significantly associated with weight gain, owing to high correlation between these two factors38, we decided to proceed with menopausal status only, as it plays a larger role than age in treatment decisions.10 Compared with white women, African American women and Hispanic women were similarly more likely to gain weight, whereas Asian women were less likely to gain weight. Patients who received ET with an AI were less likely than those who received tamoxifen to gain weight. Interestingly, BMI at diagnosis and radiation therapy were not associated with weight gain during ET.
Table 2.
Results of the Univariate Analysis for Associations between Patient Characteristics and Weight Change
| Variable | OR | CI | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis (continuous variable) |
0.97 | 0.96–0.98 | <0.001 |
| BMI | |||
| Normal or underweight | Ref. | ||
| Overweight or obese | 0.92 | 0.72–1.16 | 0.478 |
| Race | |||
| White | Ref. | ||
| African American | 0.88 | 0.57–1.35 | 0.575 |
| Hispanic | 1.03 | 0.70–1.51 | 0.888 |
| Asian | 0.39 | 0.21–0.75 | 0.004 |
| Menopausal status | |||
| Postmenopausal | Ref. | ||
| Premenopausal | 1.65 | 1.26–2.15 | <0.001 |
| Disease stage | |||
| I | Ref. | ||
| II or III | 1.37 | 1.08–1.73 | 0.009 |
| Tumor grade | |||
| I | Ref. | ||
| II | 1.56 | 1.03–2.37 | 0.037 |
| III | 1.94 | 1.24–3.04 | 0.004 |
| Histology | |||
| Ductal | Ref. | ||
| Lobular | 0.79 | 0.53–1.19 | 0.263 |
| Mixed | 1.33 | 0.91–1.95 | 0.143 |
| Other | 0.60 | 0.34–1.04 | 0.070 |
| Chemotherapy | |||
| No | Ref. | ||
| Yes | 1.36 | 1.08–1.72 | 0.010 |
| Endocrine therapy | |||
| T | Ref. | ||
| AI | 0.73 | 0.56–0.95 | 0.019 |
| Sequential AI and T | 1.32 | 0.94–1.84 | 0.106 |
| Radiation therapy | |||
| No | Ref. | ||
| Yes | 0.91 | 0.71–1.17 | 0.459 |
| Surgery | |||
| Lumpectomy | Ref. | ||
| Mastectomy | 1.32 | 1.04–1.66 | 0.020 |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; T, tamoxifen; AI, aromatase inhibitor.
Multivariable Analysis for Associations between Patient Characteristics and Weight Change
The results of the multivariable analysis are shown in Table 3. Women who were premenopausal at diagnosis were 1.40 times more likely than women who were postmenopausal at diagnosis to have a weight gain of >5% (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.93; p=0.040). Asian women were less likely than women of other races to gain weight. No tumor characteristics were associated with weight gain in the presence of other variables in the multivariable model. The odds of gaining weight did not differ significantly between patients who did or did not undergo chemotherapy or mastectomy. The specific type of ET agent (tamoxifen, AI, or sequential therapy) was not significantly associated with weight gain after 5 years of adjuvant ET.
Table 3.
Results of the Multivariable Analysis for Associations between Patient Characteristics and Weight Change
| Variable | OR | CI | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Menopausal status | |||
| Postmenopausal | Ref. | ||
| Premenopausal | 1.40 | 1.01–1.93 | 0.040 |
| Race | |||
| White | Ref. | ||
| African American | 0.84 | 0.54–1.29 | 0.419 |
| Hispanic | 0.95 | 0.64–1.41 | 0.800 |
| Asian | 0.35 | 0.19–0.67 | 0.002 |
| Endocrine therapy | |||
| T | Ref. | ||
| AI | 0.83 | 0.61–1.13 | 0.237 |
| Sequential AI and T | 1.33 | 0.95–1.88 | 0.100 |
| Chemotherapy | |||
| No | Ref. | ||
| Yes | 1.16 | 0.90–1.51 | 0.245 |
| Surgery | |||
| Lumpectomy | Ref. | ||
| Mastectomy | 1.23 | 0.96–1.56 | 0.107 |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; T, tamoxifen; AI, aromatase inhibitor.
Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that, compared with women with a weight change of ≤5%, those with a weight gain of >5% were not at an increased risk of recurrence after completing 5 years of ET (Figure 2). After adjustment for significant baseline risk factors and pre-specified treatment variables, the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model showed that a weight gain of >5% did not significantly increase recurrence risk (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.62–1.47; p=0.829).
Figure 2.

Recurrence-free survival by weight change.
Discussion
The results of our study suggest that the risk of weight gain during ET is higher among BC patients who were premenopausal at diagnosis than among those who were postmenopausal. In addition, compared with those who had a weight change of ≤5%, BC patients who had a weight gain of >5% during ET did not have a higher risk of disease recurrence. This study helps in understanding the relationship of weight gain specifically during ET and its implication on disease recurrence.
Previous studies have shown that premenopausal status at BC diagnosis is a strong predictor of weight gain,10 although this association remains under discussion.39–43 In our study, premenopausal status at diagnosis was associated with significant weight gain. Studies of BC patients receiving tamoxifen have found weight gain to be more highly correlated with premenopausal status than with postmenopausal status at diagnosis.44 One study of women on tamoxifen reported weight gain in 61% of premenopausal as compared to 39% of postmenopausal women (p=0.0001).45 A second study showed significant weight gain in patients receiving tamoxifen vs. no tamoxifen (p<0.05) and this effect was more pronounced in premenopausal women.46 A third study reported that the percentages of groups of BC survivor’s age ≤49 years, 50–59 years, or ≥60 years at diagnosis who gained weight were 43%, 39%, and 33%, respectively47 which all correlates with our findings. In the present study, the univariate analysis revealed that both younger age and premenopausal status at diagnosis were significantly associated with a weight gain of >5%; however, we included only menopausal status in the multivariable model as it has a more important role in choosing a particular ET and age is correlated with menopausal status.
Differences in weight gain amongst race/ethnicity were also assessed. In our study, Asian women had a significantly lower risk of gaining weight during 5 years of ET compared to women of other races. Among women with BC from the WHEL study, Asian Americans had a smaller risk of weight gain with chemotherapy than women of other races.23 The correlation of race with weight gain suggests that demographic and genetic factors are correlated with weight change in BC survivors as well as in the general population.41
Although mastectomy did show an association with weight gain in the univariate analysis, such association did not hold in the multivariable analysis. Studies of younger breast cancer patients who underwent a mastectomy compared to older patients, found that the younger women tended to have worse body image.48–55 Others have shown that undergoing a mastectomy may have an impact on appearance and satisfaction.54, 56–61 Changes in the body image of a breast cancer patient may have an impact on weight gain.62
For HR-positive BC, ET commonly includes an aromatase inhibitor (AI)63, usually exemestane, anastrozole, or letrozole64, for postmenopausal women, and tamoxifen or AI plus ovarian suppression4, 64, 65 for premenopausal women. Some BC patients may initiate ET with tamoxifen and then switch in a sequential manner to an AI, or vice versa66, depending on different clinical scenarios, such as becoming postmenopausal during ET, or because of toxicities. As expected, patients receiving AIs were more likely to have been postmenopausal at diagnosis, and those receiving tamoxifen were more likely to be premenopausal. However, we found no significant differences in weight change among patients receiving tamoxifen alone, AI alone, or sequential therapy with tamoxifen and AI. In the univariate analysis tamoxifen showed correlation with weight gain but not in the multivariable analysis; this may be attributed to the fact that tamoxifen is essentially a surrogate for premenopausal status, which could be why it correlates with weight gain in the univariate analysis. Our finding is similar to what is reported in the literature. The ATAC trail, a large randomized study of early stage postmenopausal BC, showed that 20% of patients receiving tamoxifen alone gained 2 to 5kg, and 20.8% on AI alone had the same weight gain 67over a period of 5 years of ET, implying that there was no difference in weight gain with regard to the type of ET. Another randomized study of postmenopausal women who were disease free after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen were randomly assigned to switch to exemestane or continue with tamoxifen until 5 years of treatment were completed, reported that 55.3% of patients receiving tamoxifen and 51.5% of patients receiving exemestane had a > 5% weight gain at 5 years.2, 7 These weight gains were self-reported and did not have a fixed definition of weight gain which complicates comparisons among studies.
It is noteworthy from the above studies that weight gain is potentially not related to the type of endocrine therapy, but could be due to more comprehensive reasons like lifestyle factors including diet, exercise routine and socio demographic characteristics comprising of age, marital status, education and menopausal status. 68Also attributable reasons for weight gain due to AI mentioned in a recent systemic analysis related it to a prevalent side effect of musculoskeletal pain due to aromatase inhibitors leading to decline in physical activity,69 which in turn can contribute to energy imbalance.4
In our study, patients with weight gains of >5% after 5 years of ET were not at an increased risk of recurrence. A similar result was reported combining the comparison cohort of the WHEL’s study and the LACE study having no effect of weight gain after initial treatment on recurrence.21 However, previous studies have identified weight gain as a risk factor for BC recurrence70, 71; in one of these studies, BMI gain was a significant determinant of recurrence (p=0.0008). 70It would be difficult to compare these findings among studies as different measures were used to determine weight change.
Our study has the limitations inherent to a retrospective observational analysis, such as potential selections biases, however, since all BC survivors were disease free and received ET for 5 years, we considered this to be a very homogeneous study population. Our study design is unique as we decided to focus specifically on weight change during the 5 years of ET and we did not consider the weight at diagnosis, or prior to diagnosis. Therefore, some patients may have gained weight during their initial treatment (i.e., surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) prior to starting ET, which may complicate the comparing of our study results with other investigators who have studied weight gain after BC treatment. As a strength, our study included BC survivors for whom highly annotated clinicopathological data were available, and we used very specific time points to determine weight changes after ET.
Our findings suggest that, regardless of their baseline BMI or ET regimen, BC patients who are premenopausal at diagnosis have an increased risk of weight gain after 5 years of ET. Compared with patients with weight changes of ≤5% after ET, those with weight gains of >5% are not at an increased risk of recurrence. The findings of our study could be used to identify patients who may derive the most benefit from lifestyle interventions and specific weight management programs by help increase providers’ and patients’ awareness and knowledge of weight change during breast cancer treatment and its potential clinical implications. Counseling on lifestyle changes could be considered a health goal for premenopausal BC survivors and may help improve BC patients’ enroll to these weight management services. Weight management programs and clinical trials of health education materials, such as those offered at our institution, could also benefit premenopausal BR survivors. The associations between weight gain and BC prognosis may be more heterogeneous than previously reported, and future studies of weight gain among BC patients should focus on identifying the underlying biological mechanisms of these associations.
Clinical Practice Points.
This study helps identify breast cancer patients who may be at higher risk of gaining weight after 5 years of endocrine therapy and who may derive the most benefit from lifestyle interventions and weight management programs.
This study also helps increase providers’ and patients’ awareness and knowledge of weight change during breast cancer treatment and its potential clinical implications.
The results of this study may stimulate the development of practice tools and resources to help oncologists address weight change with their breast cancer patients and help enroll them into weight management programs.
Acknowledgments
Joe Munch in MD Anderson’s Department of Scientific Publications edited the manuscript. This study was supported by MD Anderson’s Young Breast Cancer Survivors Program (104029) and by the National Cancer Institute through MD Anderson’s Cancer Center Support Grant (P30CA016672). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
Previous presentation: This study was presented in part as a poster presentation at the Fifth State of the Science Cancer Survivorship Research Symposium at MD Anderson Cancer Center in February of 2017.
Disclaimers: All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- 1.Vance V, Mourtzakis M, McCargar L, Hanning R. Weight gain in breast cancer survivors: prevalence, pattern and health consequences. Obesity reviews. 2011;12:282–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00805.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fallowfield L, Kilburn L, Langridge C, Snowdon C, Bliss J, Coombes R. Long-term assessment of quality of life in the Intergroup Exemestane Study: 5 years post-randomisation. British journal of cancer. 2012;106:1062–1067. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Van de Velde CJ, Rea D, Seynaeve C, et al. Adjuvant tamoxifen and exemestane in early breast cancer (TEAM): a randomised phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 2011;377:321–331. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62312-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nyrop KA, Williams G, Muss HB, Shachar S. Weight gain during adjuvant endocrine treatment for early-stage breast cancer: What is the evidence? Breast cancer research and treatment. 2016;158:203–217. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3874-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fisher B, Dignam J, Bryant J, Wolmark N. Five versus more than five years of tamoxifen for lymph node-negative breast cancer: updated findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-14 randomized trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2001;93:684–690. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.9.684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Group IBCS. Tamoxifen after adjuvant chemotherapy for premenopausal women with lymph node-positive breast cancer: International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 13-93. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006;24:1332–1341. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.0783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fallowfield LJ, Bliss JM, Porter LS, et al. Quality of life in the intergroup exemestane study: a randomized trial of exemestane versus continued tamoxifen after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006;24:910–917. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.3654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ganz PA, Cecchini RS, Julian TB, et al. Patient-reported outcomes with anastrozole versus tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with lumpectomy plus radiotherapy (NSABP B-35): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. The Lancet. 2016;387:857–865. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01169-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Carmichael A. Obesity and prognosis of breast cancer. Obesity Reviews. 2006;7:333–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00261.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, et al. Adjuvant treatment and onset of menopause predict weight gain after breast cancer diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1999;17:120–120. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Enger SM, Greif JM, Polikoff J, Press M. Body weight correlates with mortality in early-stage breast cancer. Archives of surgery. 2004;139:954–960. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.9.954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chlebowski RT, Aiello E, McTiernan A. Weight loss in breast cancer patient management. Journal of clinical oncology. 2002;20:1128–1143. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.4.1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Boyd NF, Campbell JE, Germanson T, Thomson DB, Sutherland DJ, Meakin JW. Body Weight and Prognosis in Breast Cancer 2 3 4. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1981;67:785–789. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, et al. Fasting insulin and outcome in early-stage breast cancer: results of a prospective cohort study. Journal of clinical oncology. 2002;20:42–51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.1.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kumar NB, Cantor A, Allen K, Cox CE. Android obesity at diagnosis and breast carcinoma survival. Cancer. 2000;88:2751–2757. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12<2751::aid-cncr13>3.0.co;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.NEWMAN SC, Miller A, HOWE GR. A study of the effect of weight and dietary fat on breast cancer survival time. American journal of epidemiology. 1986;123:767–774. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Irwin ML, Smith AW, McTiernan A, et al. Influence of pre-and postdiagnosis physical activity on mortality in breast cancer survivors: the health, eating, activity, and lifestyle study. Journal of clinical oncology. 2008;26:3958–3964. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Patterson RE, Cadmus LA, Emond JA, Pierce JP. Physical activity, diet, adiposity and female breast cancer prognosis: a review of the epidemiologic literature. Maturitas. 2010;66:5–15. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Caan BJ, Kwan ML, Hartzell G, et al. Pre-diagnosis body mass index, post-diagnosis weight change, and prognosis among women with early stage breast cancer. Cancer Causes & Control. 2008;19:1319–1328. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9203-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bradshaw PT, Ibrahim JG, Stevens J, et al. Epidemiology. Vol. 23. Cambridge: Mass; 2012. Post-diagnosis change in bodyweight and survival after breast cancer diagnosis; p. 320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Caan BJ, Emond JA, Natarajan L, et al. Post-diagnosis weight gain and breast cancer recurrence in women with early stage breast cancer. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2006;99:47–57. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9179-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Makari-Judson G, Braun B, Jerry DJ, Mertens WC. Weight gain following breast cancer diagnosis: implication and proposed mechanisms. World journal of clinical oncology. 2014;5:272. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Saquib N, Flatt SW, Natarajan L, et al. Weight gain and recovery of pre-cancer weight after breast cancer treatments: evidence from the women’s healthy eating and living (WHEL) study. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2007;105:177–186. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9442-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gu K, Chen X, Zheng Y, et al. Weight change patterns among breast cancer survivors: results from the Shanghai breast cancer survival study. Cancer Causes & Control. 2010;21:621–629. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9491-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Levine EG, Raczynski JM, Carpenter JT. Weight gain with breast cancer adjuvant treatment. Cancer. 1991;67:1954–1959. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910401)67:7<1954::aid-cncr2820670722>3.0.co;2-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kroenke CH, Chen WY, Rosner B, Holmes MD. Weight, weight gain, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. Journal of clinical oncology. 2005;23:1370–1378. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sinha AK, Patel JR, Shen Y, et al. Location of Receipt of Initial Treatment and Outcomes in Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors. PloS one. 2017;12:e0170081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Organization WH. Global database on Body Mass Index: BMI Classification. 2006;2015 [Google Scholar]
- 29.Carlson RW, Hudis CA, Pritchard KI. Adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer: evolution of NCCN, ASCO, and St Gallen recommendations. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2006;4:971–979. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2006.0082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Klein S, Burke LE, Bray GA, et al. Clinical implications of obesity with specific focus on cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2004;110:2952–2967. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000145546.97738.1E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Doyle C, Kushi LH, Byers T, et al. Nutrition and physical activity during and after cancer treatment: an American Cancer Society guide for informed choices. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2006;56:323–353. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.6.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Franz MJ, Bantle J, Beebe CA, Brunzell JD. American Diabetes Association position statement: Evidence-based nutrition principles and recommendations for the treatment and prevention of diabetes and related. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2002;102:109. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90031-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sedjo RL, Hines LM, Byers T, et al. Long-term weight gain among Hispanic and non-Hispanic White women with and without breast cancer. Nutrition and cancer. 2013;65:34–42. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2013.741750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sedjo RL, Byers T, Ganz PA, et al. Weight gain prior to entry into a weight-loss intervention study among overweight and obese breast cancer survivors. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2014;8:410–418. doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0351-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hudis CA, Barlow WE, Costantino JP, et al. Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007;25:2127–2132. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hosmer DW, Jr, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. John Wiley & Sons; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mickey RM, Greenland S. The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. American journal of epidemiology. 1989;129:125–137. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hill K. The demography of menopause. Maturitas. 1996;23:113–127. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(95)00968-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Irwin ML, McTiernan A, Baumgartner RN, et al. Changes in body fat and weight after a breast cancer diagnosis: influence of demographic, prognostic, and lifestyle factors. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23:774–782. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Camoriano JK, Loprinzi CL, Ingle JN, Therneau TM, Krook JE, Veeder MH. Weight change in women treated with adjuvant therapy or observed following mastectomy for node-positive breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1990;8:1327–1334. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.8.1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rock CL, Flatt SW, Newman V, et al. Factors associated with weight gain in women after diagnosis of breast cancer. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1999;99:1212–1221. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(99)00298-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Campbell K, Lane K, Martin A, Gelmon K, McKenzie D. Resting energy expenditure and body mass changes in women during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Cancer nursing. 2007;30:95–100. doi: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000265004.64440.5f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Han H-S, Lee K-W, Kim JH, et al. Weight changes after adjuvant treatment in Korean women with early breast cancer. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2009;114:147–153. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9984-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kumar N, Allen K, Cantor A, et al. Weight gain associated with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in stage I and II breast cancer: fact or artifact? Breast cancer research and treatment. 1997;44:135–143. doi: 10.1023/a:1005721720840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Malinovszky K, Cameron D, Douglas S, et al. Breast cancer patients’ experiences on endocrine therapy: monitoring with a checklist for patients on endocrine therapy (C-PET) The Breast. 2004;13:363–368. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2004.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hoskin PJ, Ashley S, Yarnold JR. Weight gain after primary surgery for breast cancer-effect of tamoxifen. Breast cancer research and treatment. 1992;22:129–132. doi: 10.1007/BF01833342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fisher B, Dignam J, Bryant J, et al. Five versus more than five years of tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes and estrogen receptor-positive tumors. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1996;88:1529–1542. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.21.1529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Przezdziecki A, Sherman KA, Baillie A, Taylor A, Foley E, Stalgis‐Bilinski K. My changed body: breast cancer, body image, distress and self‐compassion. Psycho‐Oncology. 2013;22:1872–1879. doi: 10.1002/pon.3230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Begovic-Juhant A, Chmielewski A, Iwuagwu S, Chapman LA. Impact of body image on depression and quality of life among women with breast cancer. Journal of psychosocial oncology. 2012;30:446–460. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2012.684856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Andrzejczak E, Markocka‐Mączka K, Lewandowski A. Partner relationships after mastectomy in women not offered breast reconstruction. Psycho‐Oncology. 2013;22:1653–1657. doi: 10.1002/pon.3197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hopwood P, Haviland J, Mills J, Sumo G, Bliss JM. The impact of age and clinical factors on quality of life in early breast cancer: an analysis of 2208 women recruited to the UK START Trial (Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy Trial) The Breast. 2007;16:241–251. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2006.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kenny P, King M, Shiell A, et al. Early stage breast cancer: costs and quality of life one year after treatment by mastectomy or conservative surgery and radiation therapy. The Breast. 2000;9:37–44. doi: 10.1054/brst.1999.0111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Härtl K, Schennach R, Müller M, et al. Quality of life, anxiety, and oncological factors: a follow-up study of breast cancer patients. Psychosomatics. 2010;51:112–123. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.51.2.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Moreira H, Canavarro MC. A longitudinal study about the body image and psychosocial adjustment of breast cancer patients during the course of the disease. European journal of oncology nursing. 2010;14:263–270. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Elmir R, Jackson D, Beale B, Schmied V. Against all odds: Australian women’s experiences of recovery from breast cancer. Journal of clinical nursing. 2010;19:2531–2538. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03196.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fobair P, Stewart SL, Chang S, D’onofrio C, Banks PJ, Bloom JR. Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2006;15:579–594. doi: 10.1002/pon.991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Al-Ghazal S, Fallowfield L, Blamey R. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. European Journal of Cancer. 2000;36:1938–1943. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00197-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Avis NE, Crawford S, Manuel J. Psychosocial problems among younger women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2004;13:295–308. doi: 10.1002/pon.744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Janz NK, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, et al. Population-based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer. Quality of Life Research. 2005;14:1467–1479. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-0288-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mahapatro F, Parkar SR. A comparative study of coping skills and body image: mastectomized vs. lumpectomized patients with breast carcinoma. Indian journal of psychiatry. 2005;47:198. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.43051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Arora NK, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, et al. Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the quality of life of younger women with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;92:1288–1298. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1288::aid-cncr1450>3.0.co;2-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Helms RL, O’Hea EL, Corso M. Body image issues in women with breast cancer. Psychology, Health and medicine. 2008;13:313–325. doi: 10.1080/13548500701405509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Taylor WC, Muss HB. Recent advances: adjuvant therapy for older women with breast cancer. The Cancer Journal. 2010;16:289–293. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181eea208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Burstein HJ, Temin S, Anderson H, et al. Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline focused update. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2014;32:2255–2269. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.2258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Burstein HJ, Lacchetti C, Anderson H, et al. Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on Ovarian Suppression. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2016;34:1689–1701. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.9573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bauerschlag DO, Maass N, Schem C. Standard of care and controversies in the adjuvant endocrine treatment of hormone-responsive early breast cancer. Breast Care. 2014;9:283–286. doi: 10.1159/000365561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sestak I, Harvie M, Howell A, Forbes JF, Dowsett M, Cuzick J. Weight change associated with anastrozole and tamoxifen treatment in postmenopausal women with or at high risk of developing breast cancer. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2012;134:727–734. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2085-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kim SH, Cho YU, Kim SJ. Weight gain and its correlates among breast cancer survivors. Asian nursing research. 2013;7:161–167. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2013.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Brown JC, Mao JJ, Stricker C, Hwang WT, Tan KS, Schmitz KH. Aromatase inhibitor associated musculoskeletal symptoms are associated with reduced physical activity among breast cancer survivors. The breast journal. 2014;20:22–28. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Fedele P, Orlando L, Schiavone P, et al. BMI variation increases recurrence risk in women with early-stage breast cancer. Future Oncology. 2014;10:2459–2468. doi: 10.2217/fon.14.180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Nechuta S, Chen WY, Cai H, et al. A pooled analysis of post-diagnosis lifestyle factors in association with late estrogen-receptor–positive breast cancer prognosis. International Journal of Cancer. 2015 doi: 10.1002/ijc.29940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
