Abstract
Pathologic variants in TP53 are known risk factors for the development of cancer. We report a 17-year-old male who presented with two primary sarcomas. Germline sequencing revealed a novel TP53 c.672 G>A mutation. Sequencing revealed wild-type TP53 in the parents, and there was no history of cancer in first-degree relatives. This de novo synonymous germline mutation results in a 5′ cryptic splice site that is bound by U1, resulting in a shift of the splice site by 5 base pairs (bp). The frame shift results in a truncated protein at residue 246, which disrupts the DNA binding domain of p53.
Keywords: Li-Fraumeni Syndrome, Splicing, Sarcoma
Introduction
TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancer [1], Encoded by 13 exons, this gene has many genetic polymorphisms leading to more than 100 haplotypes and through alternative splicing 12 non-pathogenic protein isoforms [2] [3]. To date, none of the non-pathogenic isoforms have splicing alterations in the exons 6 and 7. Most TP53 mutations associated with cancer result from a missense substitution (73%) leading to an amino acid substitution in the DNA binding domain. Other changes include frameshift insertions and deletions (9%), nonsense mutations (8%), silent mutations (4%), and splice site mutations (2%) (IARC TP53 database) [4], These mutations typically result in a full-length protein with either a gain-of-function or loss of wild-type tumor suppressive function. Exons 4 through 8 of TP53 comprise the DNA binding domain with exons 5 through 7 constitutes a hotspot for cancer-associated mutations.
The classic definition of Li-Fraumeni syndrome includes one proband with sarcoma under 45 year of age, a first-degree relative with cancer prior to the age of 45 years, and a first- or second-degree relative with any cancer before 45 years of age or a sarcoma at any age [5]. Birch and Eeles modified the criteria, leading to the nomenclature of “Li-Fraumeni-like syndrome”, which still requires two relatives with cancer. 7–24% of TP53 mutations are de novo mutations[6][7]. Carriers with TP53 pathogenic variants have a 40% probability of cancer by 20y and greater than 90% by 70 years. These mutations produce an 83-fold risk of developing multiple tumors [8].
We describe an adolescent who presented with two different sarcomas. Sequencing revealed a germline synonymous mutation in the DNA binding domain of TP53, which produces a 5′ cryptic splice site that results in a frame shift in the amino acids translated resulting in a premature termination at amino acid 246, disrupting the DNA binding domain of p53.
Case Report
A 17 year-old fraternal twin male, the product of in vitro fertilization (IVF), presented with hematuria. He was initially diagnosed with pleomorphic sarcoma, most likely a leiomyosarcoma, of the pelvis (Figure 1A+B). During the workup for metastasis, he was found to have a left humeral mass, which was biopsied and determined to be a telangiectatic osteosarcoma (Figure 1C+D). His bone marrow at diagnosis had no evidence of disease. He completed five cycles of ifosfamide/doxorubicin and local radiation, followed by surgical resection, of the pelvic tumor. His disease progressed post-operatively, and he died 13 months from his initial diagnosis. There was no family history of cancer, other than a maternal uncle diagnosed with a glioblastoma multiforme in his seventh decade.
Figure 1.

Histopathology of the two primary tumors (A-D). Hematoxylin and eosin stain. (A, B) The abdominal tumor showed both round cell (A) and pleomorphic spindle cell (B) morphology. No osteoid was identified. Smooth muscle actin immunohistochemical stain was strongly positive, favoring leiomyosarcoma. (C,D) The bone tumor consisted of spindle cells with blood-filled cystic spaces arrow (C) and osteoid production arrow (D), consistent with an aggressive telangiectatic osteosarcoma.
Methods and Results
Following informed consent, the patient and his parents provided peripheral blood lymphocytes for TP53 DNA sequencing, performed by GeneDx. Sequencing of DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes from the patient, but not his parents, revealed c.672 G>A germline variant preserving the glutamate at p. 224. However, this mutation is located at the last base pair of exon 6. An in silico algorithm (http://in-silico.net/tools/biology/sequence_conversion) predicts that this novel mutation produces a 5′ cryptic splice site at an alternative location.
Total RNA was then extracted from formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded bone marrow and leiomyosarcoma, [9]. RNA was then transcribed into cDNA using Superscript VELO master mix containing random primers (Invitrogen). The RNA yield was low 0.02 μg/pl and 0.01 μg/pl as well as the quality. Short fragments of <150 bp were amplified and the best sets amplified 131 bp using nested PCR. Primers were designed to amplify the region spanning exons 6 and 7 junction (Figure 2A). Amplified fragments were resolved by MetaPhor agarose gel, which demonstrated doublets (Figure 2B). The higher molecular weight band seen in the samples is consistent with intronic retention (arrow in Figure 2B). We believe the mutation is germline due to its presence in the bone marrow where he had no evidence of disease. However, the expression of the mutant mRNA seems to more stable in the bone marrow whereas the doublet in the tumor has less definition. The two amplified fragments were isolated from the gel and sequenced, using Sanger sequencing (GENEWIZ, South Plainfield, NJ). Sequencing of the 131 bp fragment proved challenging. To better delineate the mutation in such a small fragments, the fragments were inserted into the pcDNA3 plasmid (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) resulting in sequencing of the entire fragment. Figure 2C shows the insertion of 5 bp from the intron in the mutated strand. Supplemental figure shows sequencing from the controls samples.
Figure 2.

Genomic organization of TP53 and strategy of primer design. (A) Diagram to illustrate exons 2–11 of TP53 and where the primers are in relation to the mutation. (B) Nested PCR product lane 1 the DNA ladder, lanes 2–5 bone marrow (unaffected tissue) PCR done in quadruplicate, lanes 6–9 Tumor-leimyosarcoma in quadruplicate, lane 10 human cDNA and lane 11 human genomic DNA from an unaffected individual. A doublet is present in the bone marrow and tumor but the tumor sample has shifted up, indicating a larger fragment. (C) Sanger sequence of the tumor depicting cryptic splice site after 5 bp intronic insertion, green is the 5′ of exon 6, red is the mutation, blue are the ends of the intron, purple is the 3′ of exon 7, and all three primers.
Discussion
We performed a search and surveyed the online TP53 data in IARC TP53, NCBI dbSNP, and ExAc for mutations and their effects on the structure of p53 and its DNA binding site. Other patients harbored synonymous mutations G>T and G>C at this site. His novel germline mutations (G>A), we predicted, would result in a splice variant based on the conserved sequences for splicing at the end of the exon, but has not been previously described in the literature. The U1 splicing complex binds to the 5′ intron-exon border based on conserved sequences. A mutation in these conserved sequences can result in a shift of the spliceosome binding site and insertion of intronic sequence into the mRNA transcript. We have found no reports of our patient’s mutation. Review of the literature found a reported family with a G>A at +1 of the intron 6 resulting in an 18 bp insertion[10]. Given the conserved nature of this region and that it is a hotspot for oncogenic mutations, we believe our patient’s pathogenic variant would have truncated the p53 protein in the DNA binding site resulting in a change in the binding affinity to the DNA. Truncation mutations 5′ and 3′ of this site have been reported in adrenocortical carcinoma, sarcomas, and breast cancer [11][12] (http://p53.iarc.fr). Most TP53 mutations result in an amino acid substitution in the DNA binding domain. The mutations result in a full length protein produced with a gain of function. Most splice variants lead to a loss of function due to exon skipping or early terminations.
Interestingly, this de novo pathologic variant occurred in an adolescent, who was a product of IVF, but most evidence points to no increased risk of cancer in children conceived by IVF [13].
Limited availability of tissue prevents us from further investigation whether there are more splice variants in the tumors. The cDNA tumor bands in the agarose gel where not as defined as they were in the unaffected bone marrow. With the limited amount and quality of the tissue we have not been able to answer this question. However based on the bioinformatic analysis, we believe that the de novo synonymous germline mutation in TP53 resulted in a shift of the exon 6 splice site by 5 bp, producing a ffameshift and premature stop codon at residue 246 in exon 7. This pathogenic variant likely served as a driver for the two primary tumors in this patient. A recent report suggests that ~9% of pediatric cancers have a predisposition due to pathogenic variants. Of the genes affected, TP53 is the most common [14]. Thus, identification of TP53 germline mutations are important in pediatric cancers and cancer surveillance. Any child or adolescent with two primary cancers should undergo genetic testing and subsequent genetic counseling.
Supplementary Material
Supplemental Figure S1. depicting the Sanger sequencing results of TP53 from the control cDNA and Genomic DNA.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported partially by Department of Defense Bone Marrow Failure Idea Grant, the Children’s Hospital Foundation, and Connors’ Heroes Foundation (SJC). We thank Dr. Hrishikesh Mehta for technical advice on alternative splicing.
Abbreviations
- bp
base pair
- bm
bone marrow
Footnotes
No Conflicts of interest to report from any of the authers
References
- 1.Joruiz SM, Bourdon JC. p53 Isoforms: Key Regulators of the Cell Fate Decision. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016:a026039. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a026039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wu D, Zhang Z, Chu H, Xu M, Xue Y, Zhu H, Zhang Z. Intron 3 Sixteen Base Pairs Duplication Polymorphism of P53 Contributes to Breast Cancer Susceptibility: Evidence from Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marcel V, Vijayakumar V, Femandez-Cuesta L, Hafsi H, Sagne C, Hautefeuille A, Olivier M, Hainaut P. p53 regulates the transcription of its Delta133p53 isoform through specific response elements contained within the TP53 P2 internal promoter. Oncogene. 2010;29:2691–2700. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lawrence MS, Stojanov P, Mermel CH, Robinson JT, Garraway LA, Golub TR, Meyerson M, Gabriel SB, Lander ES, Getz G. Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types. Nature. 2014;505:495–501. doi: 10.1038/nature12912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li FP, Fraumeni JF, Mulvihill JJ, Blattner WA, Dreyfus MG, Tucker MA, Miller RW. A Cancer Family Syndrome in Twenty-four Kindreds. Cancer Res. 1988;48:5358–5362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gonzalez KD, Noltner KA, Buzin CH, Gu D, Wen-Fong CY, Nguyen VQ, Han JH, Lowstuter K, Longmate J, Sommer SS, Weitzel JN. Beyond li fraumeni syndrome: Clinical characteristics of families with p53 germline mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1250–1256. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chompret A, Brugières L, Ronsin M, Gardes M, Dessarps-Freichey F, Abel A, Hua D, Ligot L, Dondon MG, Bressac-de Paillerets B, Frébourg T, Lemerle J, Bonaïti-Pellié C, Feunteun J. P53 germline mutations in childhood cancers and cancer risk for carrier individuals. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:1932–7. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Malkin D. Li-Fraumeni Syndrome and p53 in 2015: Celebrating their Silver Anniversary. Clin Investig Med Médecine Clin Exp. 2016;39:E37–47. doi: 10.25011/cim.v39i1.26328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Specht K, Richter T, Müller U, Walch A, Werner M, Höfler H. Quantitative gene expression analysis in microdissected archival formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. Am J Pathol. 2001;158:419–29. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63985-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sakurai N, Iwamoto S, Miura Y, Nakamura T, Matsumine A, Nishioka J, Nakatani K, Komada Y. Novel p53 splicing site mutation in Li-Fraumeni-like syndrome with osteosarcoma. Pediatr Int. 2013 doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2012.03641.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ognjanovic S, Olivier M, Bergemann TL, Hainaut P. Sarcomas in TP53 germline mutation carriers: A review of the IARC TP53 database. Cancer. 2012;118:1387–1396. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Varley JM, McGown G, Thomcroft M, James LA, Margison GP, Forster G, Evans DG, Harris M, Kelsey AM, Birch JM. Are there low-penetrance TP53 Alleles? evidence from childhood adrenocortical tumors. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:995–1006. doi: 10.1086/302575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Williams CL, Bunch KJ, Stiller CA, Murphy MFG, Botting BJ, Wallace WH, Davies M, Sutcliffe AG. Cancer risk among children bom after assisted conception. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1819–1827. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang J, Walsh MF, Wu G, Edmonson MN, Gruber TA, Easton J, Hedges D, Ma X, Zhou X, Yergeau DA, Wilkinson MR, Vadodaria B, Chen X, McGee RB, Hines-Dowell S, Nuccio R, Quinn E, Shurtleff SA, Rusch M, Patel A, Becksfort JB, Wang S, Weaver MS, Ding L, Mardis ER, Wilson RK, Gajjar A, Ellison DW, Pappo AS, Pui C-H, Nichols KE, Downing JR. Germline mutations in predisposition genes in pediatric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2336–2346. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental Figure S1. depicting the Sanger sequencing results of TP53 from the control cDNA and Genomic DNA.
