Abstract
Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is most frequently produced by TSS toxin-1 (TSST-1) and Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB), and only rarely by enterotoxins A, C, D, E, and H. Various clinical pictures can occur depending on severity, patient age and immune status of the host. Severe forms, complicated by sepsis, are associated with a death rate of 50-60%. The case of a Caucasian female infant, aged seven weeks, hospitalized with a diffuse skin rash, characterized as allergodermia, who initially developed TSS with axillary intertrigo, is reported.
TSS was confirmed according to 2011 CDC criteria, and blood cultures positive for Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Severe development occurred initial, including acidosis, consumption coagulopathy, multiple organ failures (MOF), including impaired liver and kidney function. Central nervous system damage was manifest by seizures. Clinical management included medical supervision by a multidisciplinary team of infectious diseases specialist and intensive care specialist, as well as the initiation of a complex treatment plan to correct hydro electrolytic imbalances and acidosis. This treatment included antibiotic and antifungal therapy, diuretic therapy, immunoglobulins, and local treatment similar to a patient with burns to prevent superinfection of skin and mucous membranes lesions. There was a favourable response to the treatment with resolution of the illness.
Keywords: Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome, TSS, management
Introduction
Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome (TSS) presents as various clinical pictures dependant on severity, age and immune status of the host and is associated with a death rate of 50-60% in severe forms complicated by sepsis. When Staphylococcus aureus is the causative bacteria, TSS is caused by staphylococcus toxin, especially TSS toxin-1 (TSST-1), staphylococcal enterotoxin B and rarely to enterotoxins types A, C, D, E and H. These act as super antigens, activating the T lymphocytes with massive release of proinflammatory cytokines responsible for the following clinical picture of fever, rash, septic shock, and multiple organ failures [1,2,3,4]. Staphylococcal enterotoxins and TSST-1 bind to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules, activating Vβ2+T cells, which account for 10% of the total number of T lymphocytes [5,6] and which express CD45RO as evidence of lymphocyte activation.
Epidemiological studies conducted in the UK and Ireland reported an incidence rate for TSS of 0.38 per 100 000 children [7]. Both children and adults cases of varying severity and death rates of up to 50-60% in septic shock forms, are described in the literature [8,9,10].
According to CDC criteria [11], TSS diagnosis is supported by the following clinical and laboratory criteria:
body temperature >38.9°C (102.02°F)
systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg
presence of a disseminated rash
scaly skin, 1-2 weeks after onset, localized especially in the palmar-plantar level
-
multiple organ damage associated with at least three of the following:
-
–gastrointestinal tract, manifested by vomiting
-
–diarrhoea
-
–severe muscle damage, highlighted by increasing creatine phosphokinase (CPK)
-
–mucosal damage, oral, conjunctival or genital
-
–renal, hepatic functions failure, thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000/mm3)
-
–central nervous system damage, manifested by confusion with or without focal neurologic signs.
-
–
identification of Staphylococcus aureus
exclusion of other aetiologies from cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) studies or blood cultures i.e. other bacterial infections such as streptococcal infections, Rickettsia, leptospirosis and viral infections.
Case report
The case is presented of a seven week-old female Caucasian infant, who was hospitalized in the Paediatric Department for a generalized skin rash, initially thought to be allergodermia. Initially, treatment with antihistamines and corticosteroids was started. During the following four days of hospitalization, persistence of the rash was recorded, accompanied by the occurrence of fever and diarrhoea. The infant was referred to the Infectious Diseases Department (IDD), after a positive rapid diagnostic test detected rotavirus antigen. Before this episode, the baby showed no other adverse conditions. She was a second full-term baby, delivered naturally in cranial presentation, a birth weight of 2820g, Apgar score 10, initially breastfed for one week and subsequently with cow’s milk. The baby had not received medication for prevention of rickets.
At the time of referral to the IDD the infant presented with a weight of 4300g, fever (39.70C), malaise, generalized rash, tendency of scaling in flaps, particularly at the palmar-plantar level, bilaterally axillary and cervical intertrigo, eyelid and ankle oedema, vesicular breath sounds, respiratory rate of 40/min, SaO2 96%, heart rate 160-190/min, blood pressure 75/30 mmHg, fried lips, raspberry exfoliated tongue, abdominal distension, hepato-splenomegaly, rapid intestinal transit, refusal of food, oliguria, horizontal nystagmus, tendency to opisthotonus, limb spasticity, presence of deep tendon reflexes, and right hemibody myoclonus.
A lumbar puncture was performed showinga hypertensive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with no cytological or biochemical changes. Laboratory examinations showed the following: creatinine 1.73 mg/dl, BUN (blood urea nitrogen) in dynamics 64.4-83.8-98.7-107.2-25.6 mg/dL, glucose 40-41-33-65-67-48-87mg/dl, pH=7.258, lactate=53-107-70 mg/dl, base excess (cBaseECF) -8.8; -16.8-14.5 mmol/L, C-reactive protein (CRP): 6-212-194-164-99 -52 mg/dL, fibrinogen 80.9-19 mg/dl 149.9-216.7 (180-380 mg/dl), procalcitonin PCT 10 ng/ml, total protein (TP) 3.68-6.08 mg/dl, TSH 0.46 U/ml, FT4 12.67 pmol/L, FT3 1.24 pmol/L, stool and nasal swab positive for Candida +++ and blood cultures positive for Staphylococcus aureus, sensitive to chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ofloxacin, oxacillin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, resistant to penicillin.
Other examinations showed: total bilirubin (TB) = 5.12-3.44 mg/dL, direct bilirubin (DB) = 3.79-2.28 mg/dl, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 111-85 U/L, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 56-75 U/L, prothrombin time PT (Quick time) 21.7-17.8-19.6 -13.7-11.8 s (N 13-17) prothrombin activity 38.2-47.8-60 -81.6-95%, INR 1.90-1.57-1.3-1.12-1.03 (0.82-1.25), APTT 82.8 sec. -58.2 – 34.1-36.7 (24.8-37.5), and fibrin monomers (++++).
A complete blood count (CBC) showed the following changes: white blood cells (WBC) 9.08-14.17-43.40-34.16-14.21x103/μl, haematocrit 29.9-20.4-25-21.1-20.1%, haemoglobin 10.9-7.3-7.6-8-6.4g/dl, platelets 258-14-17-108x103/μl, and creatine phosphokinase (CPK) 2384 mg/dl (N: 26-192 mg/dl).
Cranial ultrasonography revealed no pathological changes. Abdominal ultrasound was also normal, except for a plied gallbladder, abdominal distension, with the fluctuation of air and semi-fluid content leakage.
The following treatment was initiated: correction of the hydro-electrolytic and acid-base imbalances, inotropic support, administration of red cell mass (RCM), platelet concentrate, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), antibiotic treatment with meropenem, teicoplanin and antibiotic de-escalation to oxacillin after skin wound healing, fluconazole, intravenous immunoglobulin 30ml/day, albumin, forced diuresis with mannitol and furosemide 3x2mg/day, proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), probiotics, anticonvulsants - levetiracetam (Keppra®) 2x0.4 ml, and local skin therapy. The results of the treatment were defervescence, healing of skin and mucous lesions, resumption of diuresis (150ml/day), correction of renal and hepatic functions and normalization of the inflammatory markers.
The baby was discharged from the hospital three weeks after admission. The parents were recommended to implement hygiene measures, administer age appropriate artificial nutrition and initiate rickets prevention and vitamin D deficiency measures.
Discussions
Staphylococcal TSS is considered in the UK, to be a condition specific to older children, compared to streptococcal toxic shock [7]. In the US, alterations in the fabrication and usage of tampons led to a decrease in staphylococcal TSS, although the incidence of nonmenstrual staphylococcal TSS increased. Nonmenstrual TSS and menstrual TSS occur with equal incidence [12]. In contrast, since 1992 in Japan, the occurrence of TSS cases in new-borns (neonatal TSS-like exanthematous disease (NTED)) has coincided with the emergence of strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus producing TSST-1, which is frequently associated with thrombocytopenia. NTED is explained by the vnew-born’s immune tolerance to TSST-1, T cells suppression, the release of large amounts of anti-inflammatory cytokines, like interleukin IL-10 in concentrations>1200pg/mL [13], responsible for the presence of anergy, the immune response to superantigens being age-dependent [14].
The present case is confirmed by taking into account all six criteria of the CDC definition. The commencement of the condition was characterised by the intertrigo lesions, the isolation of Staphylococcus from blood cultures, the presence of skin rash (Figures 1, 2), mucosal lesions (Figure 3), palmar-plantar scaling (Figure 4), renal and hepatic damage, and central nervous system impairment associated with myositis.
Fig. 1.

Skin facial lesions in a case with Staphylococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome
Fig. 2.

Skin rash in a case with Staphylococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome
Fig. 3.

Mucosal lesions in a case with Staphylococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome
Fig. 4.

Plantar scaling in a case with Staphylococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome
Although digestive events can be interpreted in the context of rotavirus co-infection, the baby presented with acute liver and renal failure, severe myositis, with CPK values 12 times higher than normal, consumption coagulopathy, severe thrombocytopenia, severe metabolic acidosis and severe damage to the central nervous system, right hemibody myoclonus, horizontal nystagmus, and spasticity. Severe hypoglycaemia was also recorded, which resolved following clinical and biological improvement, and the elimination of changes suggestive of consumption coagulopathy.
Treatment and monitoring of the baby were undertaken by a multidisciplinary team in the ICU. This included the use of isolation and incubator conditions and maintaining aseptic measures throughout. This resulted in the favourable resolution of the condition without complications or superinfection of skin areas or damaged mucous membranes.
Conclusion
Although TSS is considered rare in infants, occurrence of fever and exanthema, regardless of patient age, should point to the possible differential diagnosis of staphylococcal or streptococcal toxic shock.
Recognition of TSS diagnosis is paramount in the proper management of the disease to improve the survival rate of patients.
Consent section
Written informed consent was obtained for publication of this case report and any accompanying images from the patient’s parents. The study was accepted by the Ethics Committee of the hospital.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: Nothing to declare
References
- 1.Silversides JA, Lappin E, Ferguson AJ.. Staphylococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome: Mechanisms and Management. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2010(12):392–400. doi: 10.1007/s11908-010-0119-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Amagai M, Yamaguchi T, Hanakawa Y, Nishifuji K, Sugai M, Stanley JR.. Staphylococcal exfoliative toxin B specifically cleaves desmoglein. J Invest Dermatol. 2002(118):845–50. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.01751.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hanakawa Y, Stanley JR.. Mechanisms of blister formation by staphylococcal toxins. J Biochem. 2004(136):747–50. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvh182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ladhani S.. Understanding the mechanism of action of the exfoliative toxins of Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003(39):181–9. doi: 10.1016/S0928-8244(03)00225-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Uchiyama T, Yan X-J, Imanishi K, Yagi J.. Bacterial superantigens-mechanism of T cell activation by the superantigens and their role in the pathogenesis of infectious diseases. Microbiol Immunol. 1994(38):245–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1994.tb01772.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Uchiyama T, Imanishi K, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Kato H. Alouf JE, Popoff MR. The Comprehensive Sourcebook of Bacterial Protein Toxins. 3rd. New York: Elsevier; 2006. Staphylococcal superantigens and diseases caused by them; pp. 830–43. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Adalat S, Dawson T, Hackett SJ, Clark JE.. In association with the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit. Toxic shock syndrome surveillance in UK children. Arch Dis Child. 2014(99):1078–82. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Decleire PY, Blondiaux G, Delaere B, Glupczynski Y. Staphyloccocal scalded skin syndrome in an adult. Acta Clin Belg. 2004(59):365–8. doi: 10.1179/acb.2004.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Oono T, Kanzaki H, Yoshioka T, Arata J.. Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome in an adult. Identification of exfoliative toxin A and B genes by polymerase chain reaction. Dermatology. 1997(195):268–70. doi: 10.1159/000245958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shirin S, Gottlieb AB, Stahl EB.. Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome in an immunocompetent adult: possible implication of low-dosage prednisone. Cutis. 1998(62):223–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Toxic shock syndrome (other than Streptococcal) (TSS): 2011 Case Definition. 2014 [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chuang YY, Huang YC, Lin TY.. Toxic shock syndrome in children: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Paediatr Drugs. 2005(7):11–25. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200507010-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Takahashi N, Hasegawa H, Komiyama M. et al. Selective excretion of anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 in a superantigen-inducing neonatal infectious disease. Cytokine. 2009(45):39–43. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2008.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Takahashi N, Imanishi K, Uchiyama T.. Overall picture of an emerging neonatal infectious disease induced by a superantigenic exotoxin mainly produced by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol Immunol. 2013(57):737–45. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
