Abstract
Introduction:
Prenatal smoking exposure may lead to permanent changes in neonatal inflammation and immune response that have lifelong implications, including increased risks for atopy and respiratory disorders.
Methods:
The effect of maternal smoking on neonatal biomarkers of inflammation and immune response was assessed among 3459 singletons and twins in the Upstate KIDS Study. The following inflammatory biomarkers were measured using newborn dried blood spots (DBSs): interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1 receptor antagonist, IL-6, IL-8, C-reactive protein, and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Immunoglobulins (IgE, IgA, IgM, and IgG subclasses) were also assessed. We used generalized estimating equations to calculate mean differences (β) in biomarker levels by timing of pregnancy smoking, cigarette load, and secondhand smoke exposure after adjusting for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors including maternal body mass index.
Results:
Of the 344 (12%) women reporting smoking during pregnancy, about 40% continued throughout pregnancy and 13% reported smoking more than 1 pack per day. After covariate adjustment and Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, maternal smoking throughout pregnancy remained significantly associated with increased levels of IL-8 (β = 0.20, 95% confidence interval: 0.07, 0.32; p < .003). No significant associations were found with cigarette load or secondhand smoke exposure. Higher IgG3 levels were also associated with maternal smoking throughout pregnancy, although the association became nominally significant after adjustment for covariates (β = 0.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.0007, 0.17; p < .05).
Conclusions:
Maternal smoking throughout pregnancy was independently associated with increased IL-8 levels in newborns. Importantly, neonates of women who stopped smoking anytime in pregnancy did not have increased IL-8 levels.
Implications:
This study evaluated a range of inflammatory biomarkers and immunoglobulins in association with maternal smoking and timing/duration of smoking along with secondhand smoke exposure. By using DBSs, we present data from a large cohort of children born in Upstate New York. Our findings suggest that early differences in immunoregulation of neonates exposed to maternal smoking for full duration in utero may already be detected at birth.
Introduction
In 2009, 25% of women aged 18–44 years reported smoking 3 months prior to pregnancy in the United States.1 Of these women, 46% quit smoking before or during pregnancy.1 Maternal smoking during pregnancy is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes and long-term health implications, including childhood cancers, asthma, and other respiratory disorders, for children exposed in utero.2–4 Additionally, secondhand smoke exposure has been found to have similar, albeit less pronounced adverse effects on fetal and child health compared to active smoking habits.5 Maternal smoking is an important modifiable risk factor that remains a public health concern.
Despite evidence of the effect of maternal smoking on child health and development, little is known about the effects of cigarette smoking during pregnancy on neonatal inflammatory and immune responses. Studies suggest that both the intrauterine environment and genetic factors modify the relationship between maternal and infant cytokine responses, making it difficult to interpret the independent effect of maternal smoking.6 Cigarette smoking is known to exhibit both immunosuppressive and proinflammatory properties within smokers,7 and this is further complicated by immunologic and inflammatory changes that occur in pregnant women.8 Several retrospective studies assessed the immunological effects of maternal smoking on neonates by measuring cytokines and other inflammatory biomarkers but among small clinical populations using cord blood or other retrieval techniques.9–13 For example, using cord blood mononuclear cells, Noakes et al. observed both suppressive and proinflammatory cytokine responses to allergens in neonates of pregnancy smokers compared to neonates whose mothers never smoked.9 Similarly, in studies that measured infant cord blood immunoglobulin levels, the effect of maternal smoking is not well understood due to conflicting findings, with some studies reporting increased neonatal responses11,14–16 and others reporting no effect on neonatal immunoglobulins.17,18
There is also a poor understanding of whether biomarkers of neonatal inflammation or immune response change with maternal smoking duration either before or during pregnancy. To our knowledge, no studies have looked at the timing of smoking cessation during pregnancy and cytokine levels in neonates.
To understand whether the timing and duration of prenatal tobacco exposure alter inflammation and immune responses in early life, we evaluated the effects of maternal smoking with respect to timing, cigarette load, and secondhand smoke exposure on neonatal inflammatory biomarkers and immunoglobulins using newborn dried blood spots (DBSs) from a population-based cohort.
Materials and Methods
Study Population
We used data from the Upstate New York Infant Development Screening Program (Upstate KIDS) study, a population-based cohort of children from New York State (excluding New York City) born between September 2008 and December 2010. Originally designed to study the effects of infertility treatment on child development, the study oversampled on children conceived by infertility treatment as well as on multiple gestations.19 Triplets and quadruplets (n = 134) were excluded from the current analysis due to small sample size. Children of women who did not return a 4-month postpartum questionnaire (n = 192) were excluded due to missing smoking information. Children of women who did not provide consent for the use of residual DBS (n = 2286) were excluded. Lastly, n = 100 children were excluded due to missing/inconsistent maternal smoking information, making the final study population n = 3459 children (born to 2903 mothers). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the University at Albany (08-179) and the New York State Department of Health (07-097), which served as the designated IRBs for the Upstate KIDS Study under a reliance agreement with the National Institutes of Health. Written and informed consent was provided by all participants. Additional parental consent was obtained at 8 months postpartum for the use of residual DBS. Characteristics between parents who consented for DBS use and those who did not were comparable.20
Maternal Smoking
Maternal smoking was reported on the questionnaire administered at 4 months postpartum. Any incomplete maternal smoking information was obtained from birth certificates (n = 56 women, 2%). Women were asked about any smoking prior to pregnancy (“Have you smoked more than 100 cigarettes/5 packs in your lifetime?”), active and passive smoking during pregnancy (“During this pregnancy, about how many cigarettes did you smoke per day, on average?,” “Did you stop smoking at any point during this pregnancy?,” “During this pregnancy, did you live with a smoker?”), and smoking habits at 4 months postpartum (“Do you smoke at all now?, About how many cigarettes per day do you currently smoke on average?”). Participants were provided with categorical choices for both responses to stopping time (i.e., by trimester) and number of cigarettes smoked (i.e., less than a pack, about a pack, 1–2 packs, or 3 or more packs per day). Nonsmokers and smokers who quit prior to pregnancy served as the reference group for all analyses. Several women who quit before pregnancy recommenced by 4 months postpartum (n = 74 women, 2.5%). We excluded this group in order to ensure a clean reference group of women who, with a degree of certainty, were not smoking during pregnancy.
Information on timing and dosage of maternal smoking was available for n = 2897 and n = 2903 women and their n = 3452 and n = 3459 children, respectively. Women who reported smoking during pregnancy were further categorized into: (i) stopped within the first trimester, (ii) stopped after the first trimester, or (iii) never stopped. The decision to categorize exposure timing based on the first trimester was due to the low rate of smoking cessation (2%) during the second and third trimesters. Cigarette load was dichotomized at < 1 pack (20 cigarettes)/day or ≥ 1 pack (20 cigarettes)/day due to the small numbers of participants responding to the heavier smoking categories (i.e., two women reported smoking 1–2 packs/day and one woman reported smoking 3 or more packs/day during pregnancy).
Additionally, we looked at secondhand smoke exposure in combination with maternal smoking. Infants born to women who did not smoke and did not live with a smoker during pregnancy served as the reference group. Exposure groups were created for infants born to women who did not smoke during pregnancy but lived with a smoker at the time, women who smoked during pregnancy but did not live with another smoker, and women who smoked during pregnancy and lived with another smoker. The final sample size for our analysis of secondhand smoke exposure was n = 2857 mothers and their n = 3402 children (n = 57 infants missing information on secondhand smoking).
Inflammatory Biomarkers and Immunoglobulins
As part of the state’s Newborn Screening Program, DBSs are obtained 2–3 days after birth from a heel-prick and five drops of whole blood are placed on filter paper and then stored at low temperatures until further analysis. Particularly useful in newborn screening, DBS samples provide a noninvasive method for detecting levels of biomarkers representative of endogenous and environmental exposures. For population-based cohorts, DBS can serve as a convenient method to retrieve biological specimen and reduces the cost of immunoassay analysis of certain inflammatory markers in whole blood.21 Newborn DBSs were stored at 4°C and punches of the residual spots were extracted using methods previously described for other analytes measured from DBSs in our study.20,22,23
The biomarkers of interest were selected a priori based on existing knowledge of biological processes involved in systemic inflammation and immune function.24 These included four interleukins (interleukin 1 alpha [IL-1α], interleukin 1 receptor antagonist [IL-1ra], interleukin-8 [IL-8], and IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and immunoglobulins (Igs) for immune function (i.e., IgE, IgA, IgM, and IgG subclasses). All biomarkers except for IgE were measured as part of Kit A, Obesity, and Ig multiplex panels (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN; For Ig panel: HGAMMAG-301K-06, EMD Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA) using Luminex100 analyzer with xPONENT 3.1 software (Luminex System, Austin, TX). IgE concentrations were measured using ELISA (Cat 3810-1H-20, MABTECH Inc., Cincinnati, OH). Intra-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) were 14.0% for IL-1α, 10.1% for IL-1ra, 16.9% for IL-6, 11.5% for IL-8, 8.6% for CRP, and 8.4% for TNF-α. Intra-assay CVs for all Igs ranged from 4.8% to 12.0%. TNF-α and IL-6 concentrations had high percentages of zero values (77% and 49%, respectively). Zero values indicated that the measured concentration for TNF-α or IL-6 was lower than the background machine reading, and no trace of the biomarker was present at the time of measurement. All analyses used machine-read values without censoring to overcome latent biases.25 Measurement error introduced from the processing of multiple batches was removed using ComBat in the R software package.26–28
We assessed these biomarkers individually and in combination as an inflammatory “score.” Igs were analyzed individually. Each infant was assigned one point for a value above the population median level for each proinflammatory biomarker (IL-1α, IL-6, IL-8, CRP, and TNF-α) and for the anti-inflammatory biomarker, IL-1ra, one point was given for a value below the median level. The points for each inflammatory biomarker were then summed in order to derive an overall inflammation score with scores ranging from 0 to 6 for each child.29 A modified inflammation score was also calculated excluding TNF-α and IL-6 due to the large number of zero values for these two biomarkers.
Covariates
Information on sociodemographic characteristics such as maternal race and ethnicity, education, marital status, health insurance, age, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), alcohol use during pregnancy (yes/no), any dietary supplementation during pregnancy (yes/no), any infertility treatment for the index pregnancy (yes/no), and parity was obtained from the 4-month postpartum questionnaire or birth certificates. Infant characteristics including gender, plurality, birth weight, and gestational age were obtained from birth certificates.
Statistical Analyses
Chi-square and independent sample t tests were used to determine differences in baseline characteristics by maternal smoking status in pregnancy.
Analyses were performed in all singletons and both twins (n = 3459). Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) with robust standard errors were used to estimate associations between maternal smoking and continuous levels of individual inflammatory biomarkers and Igs, as well as the overall inflammation score. GEE was specifically used to account for correlation among twins. Due to the large number of zero values for TNF-α and IL-6, the two biomarkers were dichotomized at the zero concentration. GEE logistic regression models were used to evaluate these associations with maternal smoking. Biomarker values were transformed for normality before using complete Markov chain Monte Carlo data imputation for missing values. Biomarker values were back transformed after imputations. In the imputed data set, box-cox transformation was used to assess the optimal method of transformation for each biomarker conditional on their associations with maternal smoking. All biomarkers were log transformed in analyses. Missing values for prepregnancy BMI, alcohol use during pregnancy, private insurance, marital status, and parity were imputed using multiple imputations through creating 10 data sets based on a Bernoulli distribution with probabilities dependent on their observed distributions by type of infertility treatment.
We adjusted for maternal age, race and ethnicity, education, insurance, marital status, prepregnancy BMI, alcohol use during pregnancy, any dietary supplement use while pregnant, any infertility treatment, parity, and infant plurality.30 Our aim was to estimate the overall effect of maternal smoking on cytokine levels in neonates. Hence, we did not adjust for mediators such as pregnancy complications or maternal/neonatal infections because that may cause overadjustment bias in analyses for the association between smoking and inflammation.31 Similar to previous studies using data from this cohort, sampling weights using New York State vital record information of all births from 2008 to 2010 were applied to all models to account for the oversampling of twins and children conceived by infertility treatment.19 Additionally, we weighted models to account for DBS consent. In sensitivity analyses, GEE was used to test associations between the modified inflammation score and maternal smoking.
Estimates and 95% confidence intervals were reported for all biomarkers. To account for multiple hypothesis testing, a Bonferroni-corrected p value was set at p < .0036 (0.05/14) (i.e., 13 biomarkers and the overall score). Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
Results
About 12% of women smoked during pregnancy (Table 1), of whom 156 (43%) smoked throughout the entire pregnancy. Women who smoked during pregnancy were younger and more likely to be single and have a higher prepregnancy BMI than those who did not smoke. Smokers were also less likely to have private insurance, complete higher education, have taken dietary supplements during pregnancy, and have used infertility treatment. Infants born to women who smoked during pregnancy had lower birth weights compared with infants born to women who did not smoke in pregnancy. Distributions of inflammatory biomarker and immunoglobulin levels for mother–child pairs stratified by maternal smoking status are shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics by Maternal Smoking Status of Participants Consenting to Use of Dried Blood Spots in the Upstate KIDS Study
| Characteristicsa | N = 2903 | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smoking during pregnancy | No smoking during pregnancy | ||
| n (%) | n (%) | ||
| Mothers | 344 | 2559 | |
| Age (y)b | 27.1 (6.3) | 31.7 (5.6) | <.001 |
| Non-Hispanic White | 295 (85.8) | 2136 (83.5) | .28 |
| Prepregnancy BMI (kg/m2)b | 27.8 (7.3) | 26.8 (6.8) | .01 |
| Privately insured | 171 (49.7) | 2147 (84.0) | <.001 |
| Married | 260 (77.2) | 2345 (92.8) | <.001 |
| College degree or higher | 44 (12.8) | 1613 (63.0) | <.001 |
| Alcohol use during pregnancy | 47 (13.7) | 358 (14.0) | .87 |
| Any dietary supplementation during pregnancy | 227 (66.0) | 2111 (82.5) | <.001 |
| Any infertility treatment | 32 (9.3) | 911 (35.6) | <.001 |
| Nulliparous | 145 (42.3) | 1180 (46.5) | .14 |
| Infantsc | |||
| Males | 183 (53.2) | 1318 (51.5) | .56 |
| Singletons | 287 (83.4) | 2030 (79.3) | .08 |
| Birth weight (g)b | 3120.1 (687.1) | 3210.0 (674.6) | .02 |
| Gestational age (wk)b | 38.3 (2.3) | 38.1 (2.4) | .31 |
BMI = body mass index; N = total number.
aNumber of participants missing information for characteristics before analyses: 4 for prepregnancy BMI, 2 for insurance, 31 for marital status, 1 for alcohol use during pregnancy, 22 for parity.
bData are presented as n (%) with the following exceptions: age (y), birth weight (g), gestational age (wk), and prepregnancy BMI (kg/m2) are reported as mean (SD).
cTotal sample size is restricted to all singletons and one twin selected at random for a 1:1 ratio of mothers: infants.
Unadjusted and adjusted mean differences as log unit changes in continuous measures of neonatal biomarkers and inflammation score by timing of smoking exposure in pregnancy are shown in Table 2. After adjustment, only IL-8 levels were elevated among infants born to women who smoked for their entire pregnancy (p = .003). No other differences were statistically significant or noted after adjustment (i.e., IgG1, IgG3, and IgM).
Table 2.
Mean Differences in DBS-Measured Neonatal Biomarkers by Timing of Smoking Exposure in Pregnancy
| Neonatal biomarkersa,b,c | Stopped within the 1st trimester | Stopped after 1st trimester | Smoked for the entire pregnancy | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 160 | N = 72 | N = 156 | ||||
| Unadjusted | Adjusted | Unadjusted | Adjusted | Unadjusted | Adjusted | |
| β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | |
| Inflammation score | 0.12 (−0.05, 0.29) | 0.01 (−0.17, 0.18) | 0.11 (−0.14, 0.35) | −0.002 (−0.25, 0.25) | 0.09 (−0.09, 0.27) | 0.01 (−0.18, 0.20) |
| CRP | 0.11 (−0.01, 0.22) | 0.03 (−0.08, 0.15) | 0.08 (−0.06, 0.23) | 0.01 (−0.13, 0.16) | 0.12 (0.01, 0.24) | 0.10 (−0.02, 0.21) |
| IL-8 | 0.06 (−0.04, 0.16) | 0.04 (−0.06, 0.15) | −0.02 (−0.17, 0.13) | −0.03 (−0.18, 0.12) | 0.20 (0.08, 0.32) | 0.20 (0.07, 0.32) |
| IL-1ra | −0.06 (−0.15, 0.03) | −0.08 (−0.17, 0.02) | 0.01 (−0.12, 0.13) | −0.04 (−0.16, 0.08) | 0.08 (−0.02, 0.17) | 0.05 (−0.05, 0.14) |
| IL-1α | 0.001 (−0.13, 0.13) | −0.01 (−0.15, 0.12) | 0.04 (−0.17, 0.25) | −0.02 (−0.24, 0.20) | −0.003 (−0.14, 0.13) | −0.03 (−0.17, 0.12) |
| IgE | 0.002 (−0.11, 0.12) | −0.01 (−0.13, 0.11) | −0.03 (−0.19, 0.14) | −0.03 (−0.19, 0.13) | 0.00002 (−0.12, 0.12) | −0.01 (−0.13, 0.11) |
| IgA | 0.07 (−0.01, 0.15) | 0.06 (−0.02, 0.15) | 0.03 (−0.09, 0.15) | 0.03 (−0.09, 0.15) | 0.03 (−0.05, 0.11) | 0.05 (−0.03, 0.13) |
| IgM | 0.02 (−0.06, 0.10) | 0.02 (−0.06, 0.10) | 0.12 (0.01, 0.24) | 0.13 (0.01, 0.24) | −0.01 (−0.09, 0.06) | 0.001 (−0.08, 0.08) |
| IgG1 | −0.02 (−0.06, 0.02) | −0.02 (−0.07, 0.02) | 0.07 (0.01, 0.14) | 0.07 (0.001, 0.14) | 0.02 (−0.03, 0.06) | 0.02 (−0.03, 0.06) |
| IgG2 | 0.005 (−0.10, 0.11) | 0.03 (−0.07, 0.14) | −0.04 (−0.18, 0.11) | 0.01 (−0.14, 0.16) | −0.04 (−0.14, 0.06) | 0.02 (−0.09, 0.12) |
| IgG3 | −0.02 (−0.11, 0.07) | −0.07 (−0.16, 0.02) | 0.17 (0.04, 0.30) | 0.09 (−0.05, 0.22) | 0.16 (0.08, 0.24) | 0.09 (0.0007, 0.17) |
| IgG4 | 0.05 (−0.14, 0.23) | 0.05 (−0.13, 0.24) | −0.01 (−0.27, 0.25) | −0.01 (−0.28, 0.26) | 0.03 (−0.15, 0.22) | 0.05 (−0.14, 0.25) |
IL = interleukin; CI = confidence interval; CRP = C-reactive protein; DBS = dried blood spot; Ig = immunoglobulin; IL-1ra = IL-1 receptor antagonist; N = total number of infants.
aTotal sample size includes all singletons and twins with information on timing of smoking exposure (n = 3452 infants born to 2897 mothers) in the Upstate KIDS birth cohort.
bInfants born to women who did not smoke during pregnancy served as the reference group (n = 3064 infants born to 2559 mothers).
cUnits: log ng/mL for all neonatal biomarkers except inflammation score (no units) and CRP (units: log mg/L).
Adjusted for maternal age, white race, attainment of college degree or higher, private insurance, marital status, alcohol use during pregnancy, any dietary supplementation during pregnancy, parity, infant plurality, prepregnancy body mass index, and any infertility treatment.
Statistically significant differences based on Bonferroni correction (0.05/14 = p < .0036) are in bold.
Differences in neonatal biomarkers were not detected when we quantified the intensity of cigarette exposure during pregnancy (Table 3). IL-8 levels again exhibited a linear trend with increased cigarette load (p for trend = .009). Secondhand smoke exposure in addition to maternal smoking status did not produce significant differences in the measured biomarkers (Supplementary Table 2). For biomarkers dichotomized at the zero concentration (TNF-α and IL-6) for which odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated, no increased odds were found with maternal smoking (Supplementary Table 3). In sensitivity analyses, results were similar and nonsignificant between maternal smoking and the modified inflammation score (data not shown).
Table 3.
Mean Differences in DBS-Measured Neonatal Biomarkers by Quantity of Cigarettes/Packs Smoked Per Day in Pregnancy
| Neonatal biomarkersa,b,c | Smoked < 1 pack (20 cigarettes) per day | Smoked ≥ 1 pack (20 cigarettes or more) per day | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 345 | N = 50 | |||
| Unadjusted | Adjusted | Unadjusted | Adjusted | |
| β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | |
| Inflammation score | 0.10 (−0.01, 0.22) | 0.004 (−0.12, 0.13) | 0.19 (−0.11, 0.49) | 0.11 (−0.19, 0.41) |
| CRP | 0.10 (0.02, 0.18) | 0.05 (−0.03, 0.13) | 0.20 (0.001, 0.39) | 0.17 (−0.02, 0.37) |
| IL-8 | 0.08 (0.01, 0.16) | 0.07 (−0.01, 0.15) | 0.20 (0.03, 0.38) | 0.21 (0.03, 0.39) |
| IL-1ra | 0.01 (−0.06, 0.07) | −0.02 (−0.09, 0.05) | 0.05 (−0.10, 0.21) | 0.02 (−0.14, 0.17) |
| IL-1α | 0.002 (−0.09, 0.10) | −0.02 (−0.13, 0.08) | 0.06 (−0.17, 0.29) | 0.01 (−0.22, 0.25) |
| IgA | 0.05 (−0.01, 0.10) | 0.05 (−0.01, 0.11) | 0.08 (−0.05, 0.22) | 0.10 (−0.04, 0.24) |
| IgM | 0.05 (−0.01, 0.10) | 0.05 (−0.01, 0.11) | −0.07 (−0.21, 0.06) | −0.06 (−0.19, 0.08) |
| IgG1 | 0.01 (−0.02, 0.04) | 0.01 (−0.02, 0.04) | 0.03 (−0.05, 0.11) | 0.03 (−0.05, 0.11) |
| IgG2 | −0.02 (−0.09, 0.06) | 0.03 (−0.05, 0.10) | −0.06 (−0.24, 0.11) | −0.02 (−0.19, 0.16) |
| IgG3 | 0.10 (0.03, 0.16) | 0.03 (−0.04, 0.10) | 0.05 (−0.09, 0.20) | −0.03 (−0.18, 0.11) |
| IgG4 | 0.08 (−0.05, 0.20) | 0.09 (−0.04, 0.22) | −0.29 (−0.61, 0.03) | −0.28 (−0.60, 0.04) |
IL = interleukin; CI = confidence interval; CRP = C-reactive protein; DBS = dried blood spot; Ig = immunoglobulin; IL-1ra, IL-1 receptor antagonist; N = total number of infants.
aTotal sample size includes all singletons and twins with maternal smoking information (n = 3459 infants born to 2903 mothers) in the Upstate KIDS birth cohort.
bInfants born to women who did not smoke during pregnancy served as the reference group (n = 3064 infants born to 2559 mothers).
cUnits: log ng/mL for all neonatal biomarkers except inflammation score (no units) and CRP (units: log mg/L).
Adjusted for maternal age, white race, attainment of college degree or higher, private insurance, marital status, alcohol use during pregnancy, any dietary supplementation during pregnancy, parity, infant plurality, prepregnancy body mass index, and any infertility treatment.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the largest study to use biomarkers measured from newborn DBSs to evaluate the effects of maternal smoking on neonatal inflammation and immune response. We found that timing of maternal smoking during pregnancy, specifically exposure to maternal smoking through the entire pregnancy, was associated with elevated IL-8 concentrations in neonates. Associations were also suggested between higher cigarette load and secondhand smoke exposure and elevated IL-8 levels in infants, but estimates were imprecise. No significant associations were found between maternal smoking and other DBS biomarker levels. Our results indicate that prenatal smoke exposure likely interferes with normal circulating IL-8 levels in neonates that appear to direct immune system changes shortly after birth.
Cytokines and Other Inflammatory Biomarkers
Cytokines act as biological mediators in cell-mediated (T-helper 1 [Th1]) and humoral (T-helper 2 [Th2]) immune system responses.32 Both pregnancy and cigarette smoke activate Th2 over Th1 responses.8,33 Predominant humoral immune system activation then triggers the release and inhibition of both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, with proinflammatory and immunosuppressive effects that manifest in the form of allergic and autoimmune reactions.7 Furthermore, smoking can impact the innate immune response that is involved in the regulation and production of key cytokine mediators, such as TNF- α and IL-8.34 Some studies have shown that cigarette smoke in an individual increases levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, while decreasing levels of certain anti-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-10).35,36 However, other studies report conflicting associations of lower IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations in smokers.33,37 Recent studies have shown that this suppression of certain proinflammatory cytokines is attributable to nicotine, a major component of cigarette smoke.7,38
Despite the growing body of evidence on the immunological effects of tobacco smoke in adults, less is known about the effects of prenatal smoke exposure on circulating cytokine levels in neonates. Noakes et al. observed that maternal smoking was associated with higher Th2 activity as measured via increased IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13 levels in cord blood mononuclear cells.9 Another study by Noakes and colleagues concluded that the effect of maternal smoking on neonatal cytokine responses can also be mediated by toll-like receptor (TLR) function; more specifically, TLR2 pathways, which include IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-10, are attenuated in infants of smokers.10 Similarly, Latzin et al. reported decreased odds of cord IL-6 concentrations in infants born to smokers with a trend for lower IL-10 levels in cord blood.39
In contrast with these studies using cord blood,9,10,39 we did not observe differences in DBS biomarker concentrations, with the exception of IL-8, by prenatal smoke exposure. Direct comparison of this study with previous reports should be done with caution as cytokine measurements in cord blood are highly influenced by perinatal factors, while in the present study we measured cytokines in DBS taken a few days after birth. The inconsistencies between our findings and associations of lower neonatal IL-6 and TNF-α with maternal smoking may also be attributable to differences in study samples, sample size, and minimal control of confounding in aforementioned studies. For example, previous studies lacked information on relevant confounders such as prepregnancy BMI or sociodemographic factors such as education and marital status. One study also adjusted for potential mediators, including gestational age and mode of delivery, and is therefore not reporting the total effect of smoking on neonatal immune function.10 Another possible explanation for why we did not observe associations with TNF-α and IL-6 may be due to degradation that has been reported to occur after 4–6 hours at room temperature.40 However, studies measuring DBS biomarker concentrations have also reported low or undetectable levels for various cytokines and chemokines in infants from the general population,41 and therefore, might also explain why we did not observe population-based associations between maternal smoking and most DBS biomarkers compared to studies measuring cord blood levels. Importantly, we used DBSs collected from the statewide newborn screening program, which is a feasible, cost-effective tool for immunoassay analysis of inflammatory biomarkers in whole blood at proper storage techniques for population-based studies.21,42
Interleukin-8
As a proinflammatory cytokine and chemotactic agent, IL-8 directs neutrophils and other immune cells to the site of inflammation or cellular injury; IL-8 also contributes to mitogenic and angiogenic processes.43,44 Therefore, IL-8 production in pregnant women increases in the presence of infections (i.e., chorioamnionitis and neonatal sepsis) or other adverse pregnancy outcomes, which elicit similar responses such as preterm birth.45,46 Specifically in smokers, IL-8 production is enhanced and acts as a potential mechanism in the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancers.47,48 In animal models, cigarette smoking has been shown to increase bronchial epithelial proinflammatory responses with respect to IL-8 secretion, which then induce pathological cellular injury.49
In the present study, in-utero smoke exposure was found to impact neonatal inflammation with respect to increased DBS IL-8 levels. IL-8 does not appear to cross the placenta in detectable concentrations, and therefore, our finding suggests increased IL-8 levels are directly produced by the neonate as a result of in-utero smoke exposure.50 Although less is known about the mechanistic actions by which maternal smoking influences neonatal IL-8 levels, it is possible that changes in fetal programming and potential insults occurring in utero, such as toxicant exposure, fetal hypoxia, and placental aberrations in protein metabolism, as a result of maternal smoking may alter long-term cytokine signaling in infants.
Accumulating evidence suggests that IL-8 may play a major role in enhancing the disease state of certain chronic pulmonary disorders such as asthma.51 One population-based study examining the inflammatory profile of neonates with impaired lung function at 4 weeks of life reported increased IL-8 levels in these infants.52 Another study found higher levels of IL-8 in newborns with increased risks of developing chronic lung disease regardless of preterm/term status.53 Although previous research has explored IL-8 as a determinant of impaired lung function, evidence from our study supports the hypothesis that prenatal smoke exposure may impair cytokine signaling responsible for normal lung function later in life.
Immunoglobulins
Previous animal studies have shown that cigarette smoke exposure lowers serum Ig levels for IgA, IgG, and IgM in particular, but increases IgE levels—which is also suspected to occur in adult smokers.54,55 However, in neonates, previous smoking studies have either reported no change or increased concentrations of cord blood Igs in exposed versus nonexposed infants.11,14,16–18 We observed elevated IgG1, IgG3, and IgM levels in smoking groups with respect to timing of exposure and increased IgA levels with respect to secondhand smoke exposure, but these differences were not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction, and in the case of IgG3, after adjustment for confounders. Igs directly produced by the neonate include IgA, IgM, and IgE.56 However, IgG is easily transferable from the mother to the fetus across the placenta.57 Neonatal IgG production does not begin until 6 months after birth, and from the time of passive transfer by the mother in the few weeks leading to delivery until 6 months, IgG levels continue to fall as transferred maternal IgG is catabolized.56 Therefore, DBS IgG levels might reflect maternal immune responses. In our study, similar to others, we cannot confirm DBS IgG levels are of neonatal origin, and therefore, IgG or other transferable biomarkers should be explored more closely. Normal placental transport of IgG subclasses may have also been affected by maternal smoking due to inflammation and a possible increase in the proportion of neutrophils associated with elevated circulating IL-8 levels. In line with Ownby et al. and Oryszczyn et al.17,18 but not Magnusson et al.16, we did not find any association between maternal smoking and neonatal IgE levels.
Strengths and Limitations
This study had several strengths. First, we used a population-based sample with singletons and twins, which improved the generalizability of our results. Second, we were able to control for many sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics unavailable in smaller, clinical populations. Third, we used an overall inflammation score based on median biomarker levels, which did not assume normal distribution and was unaffected by outliers compared to other existing methods.
Nevertheless, our study is not without limitations. We used self-reported maternal smoking without validation from cotinine measurements. However, the prevalence of smoking in our cohort (12%) was comparable to that of other population-based studies using cotinine measurements, citing a smoking prevalence between 13% and 17% during pregnancy.17,58 In addition, a previous prospective study in the United States reported that cord blood cotinine concentrations were significantly correlated with self-reported smoking behaviors.17 We are also limited by questions pertaining to only cigarette smoking and did not ask mothers about other forms of tobacco/nicotine exposure such as chewing tobacco and electronic cigarettes. Selection bias might have arisen if the participants consenting to DBS use differed from participants without consent. However, since smoking status during pregnancy was not different between the two groups20 this is less likely the case. Furthermore, we used sampling weights for DBS consent in our analysis. Although we tested multiple associations, we interpreted our results conservatively after applying Bonferroni correction. We cannot rule out the degradation of inflammatory biomarkers, especially IL-6 and TNF-α, as a limitation of the study. Nonetheless, this degradation which depends on time exposure to ambient temperature should occur at random, and therefore, should not introduce bias in the study. Lastly, the study is not representative of the U.S. population with participation of mostly non-Hispanic white families from a single state.
Conclusion
Findings from this population-based study reveal that prenatal smoke exposure can alter cytokine signaling in newborns with respect to IL-8, a proinflammatory chemokine linked to impaired lung function, respiratory disorders, and various pathological conditions. We believe our study is the first to provide population-based evidence on this association as measured with newborn DBS; therefore, it is important for future prospective studies to confirm our findings and follow newborns over time in order to assess the predictive utility of this biomarker for childhood cancers and respiratory disorders, especially ones persisting into adulthood that are linked to the overexpression of IL-8.
Funding
This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (contracts HHSN275201200005C and HHSN267200700019C).
Declaration of Interests
None declared.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Upstate KIDS staff and participants for their efforts.
References
- 1. Robbins CL, Zapata LB, Farr SL, et al. Core state preconception health indicators—Pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system and behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2009. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014;63(3):1–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Higgins S. Smoking in pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;14(2):145–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hylkema MN, Blacquière MJ. Intrauterine effects of maternal smoking on sensitization, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009;6(8):660–662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ng SP, Zelikoff JT. Smoking during pregnancy: subsequent effects on offspring immune competence and disease vulnerability in later life. Reprod Toxicol. 2007;23(3):428–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Djuardi Y, Wibowo H, Supali T, et al. Determinants of the relationship between cytokine production in pregnant women and their infants. PLoS One. 2009;4(11):e7711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Arnson Y, Shoenfeld Y, Amital H. Effects of tobacco smoke on immunity, inflammation and autoimmunity. J Autoimmun. 2010;34(3):J258–J265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Sykes L, MacIntyre DA, Yap XJ, Teoh TG, Bennett PR. The Th1:th2 dichotomy of pregnancy and preterm labour. Mediators Inflamm. 2012;2012:967629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Noakes PS, Holt PG, Prescott SL. Maternal smoking in pregnancy alters neonatal cytokine responses. Allergy. 2003;58:1053–1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Noakes PS, Hale J, Thomas R, Lane C, Devadason SG, Prescott SL. Maternal smoking is associated with impaired neonatal toll-like-receptor-mediated immune responses. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(4):721–729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Cederqvist LL, Eddey G, Abdel-Latif N, Litwin SD. The effect of smoking during pregnancy on cord blood and maternal serum immunoglobulin levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148(8):1123–1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sazak S, Kayıran SM, Paksoy Y. Umbilical cord serum erythropoietin levels and maternal smoking in pregnancy. Sci World J. 2012;2012:420763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Rua Ede A, Porto ML, Ramos JP, et al. Effects of tobacco smoking during pregnancy on oxidative stress in the umbilical cord and mononuclear blood cells of neonates. J Biomed Sci. 2014;21:105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Magnusson CG, Johansson SG. Maternal smoking leads to increased cord serum IgG3. Allergy. 1986;41(4):302–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Shirakawa T, Morimoto K, Sasaki S, et al. Effect of maternal lifestyle on cord blood IgE factor. Eur J Epidemiol. 13(4):395–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Magnusson CG. Maternal smoking influences cord serum IgE and IgD levels and increases the risk for subsequent infant allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986;78(5 Pt 1):898–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ownby DR, Johnson CC, Peterson EL. Maternal smoking does not influence cord serum IgE or IgD concentrations. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991;88(4):555–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Oryszczyn MP, Godin J, Annesi I, Hellier G, Kauffmann F. In utero exposure to parental smoking, cotinine measurements, and cord blood IgE. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991;87(6):1169–1174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Buck Louis GM, Hediger ML, Bell EM, et al. Methodology for establishing a population-based birth cohort focusing on couple fertility and children’s development, the Upstate KIDS Study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2014;28(3):191–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Yeung EH, Louis GB, Lawrence D, et al. Eliciting parental support for the use of newborn blood spots for pediatric research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. McDade TW, Williams S, Snodgrass JJ. What a drop can do: Dried blood spots as a minimally invasive method for integrating biomarkers into population-based research. Demography. 2007;44(4):899–925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Andersen NJ, Mondal TK, Preissler MT, et al. Detection of immunoglobulin isotypes from dried blood spots. J Immunol Methods. 2014;404:24–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Yeung EH, McLain AC, Anderson N, et al. Newborn adipokines and birth outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015;29(4):317–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Opal SM, DePalo VA. Anti-inflammatory cytokines. Chest. 2000;117(4):1162–1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Schisterman EF, Vexler A, Whitcomb BW, Liu A. The limitations due to exposure detection limits for regression models. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(4):374–383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Johnson WE, Li C, Rabinovic A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics. 2007;8(1):118–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Leek JT, Johnson WE, Parker HS, Jaffe AE, Storey JD. The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(6):882–883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015. https://www.r-project.org [Google Scholar]
- 29. Pellanda LC, Duncan BB, Vigo A, Rose K, Folsom AR, Erlinger TP. Low birth weight and markers of inflammation and endothelial activation in adulthood: The ARIC study. Int J Cardiol. 2009;134(3):371–377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Cnattingius S. The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: Smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6(suppl 2):S125–S140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Schisterman EF, Cole SR, Platt RW. Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology. 2009;20(4):488–495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kidd P. Th1/Th2 balance: The hypothesis, its limitations, and implications for health and disease. Altern Med Rev. 2003;8(3):223–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hagiwara E, Takahashi KI, Okubo T, et al. Cigarette smoking depletes cells spontaneously secreting Th(1) cytokines in the human airway. Cytokine. 2001;14(2):121–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Prescott SL. Effects of early cigarette smoke exposure on early immune development and respiratory disease. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2008;9(1):3–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Bermudez EA, Rifai N, Buring JE, Manson JE, Ridker PM. Relation between markers of systemic vascular inflammation and smoking in women. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:1117–1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Glossop JR, Dawes PT, Mattey DL. Association between cigarette smoking and release of tumour necrosis factor alpha and its soluble receptors by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;45(10):1223–1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Nizri E, Irony-Tur-Sinai M, Lory O, Orr-Urtreger A, Lavi E, Brenner T. Activation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory system by nicotine attenuates neuroinflammation via suppression of Th1 and Th17 responses. J Immunol. 2009;183(10):6681–6688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Nouri-Shirazi M, Guinet E. Evidence for the immunosuppressive role of nicotine on human dendritic cell functions. Immunology. 2003;109(3):365–373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Latzin P, Frey U, Armann J, et al. Exposure to moderate air pollution during late pregnancy and cord blood cytokine secretion in healthy neonates. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Tworoger SS, Hankinson SE. Collection, processing, and storage of biological samples in epidemiologic studies: sex hormones, carotenoids, inflammatory markers, and proteomics as examples. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(9):1578–1581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Zerbo O, Yoshida C, Grether JK, et al. Neonatal cytokines and chemokines and risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder: the Early Markers for Autism (EMA) study: a case-control study. J Neuroinflammation. 2014;11:113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Skogstrand K, Ekelund CK, Thorsen P, et al. Effects of blood sample handling procedures on measurable inflammatory markers in plasma, serum and dried blood spot samples. J Immunol Methods. 2008;336(1):78–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Strieter RM, Kasahara K, Allen RM, et al. Cytokine-induced neutrophil-derived interleukin-8. Am J Pathol. 1992;141(2):397–407. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Xie K. Interleukin-8 and human cancer biology. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2001;12(4):375–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Machado JR, Soave DF, da Silva MV, et al. Neonatal sepsis and inflammatory mediators. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:269681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Boskabadi H, Maamouri G, Afshari JT, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Shakeri MT. Serum interleukin 8 level as a diagnostic marker in late neonatal sepsis. Iran J Pediatr. 2010;20(1):41–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Hoonhorst SJ, Timens W, Koenderman L, et al. Increased activation of blood neutrophils after cigarette smoking in young individuals susceptible to COPD. Respir Res. 2014;15:121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Pine SR, Mechanic LE, Enewold L, et al. Increased levels of circulating interleukin 6, interleukin 8, C-reactive protein, and risk of lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(14):1112–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Heijink IH, Pouwels SD, Leijendekker C, et al. Cigarette smoke-induced damage-associated molecular pattern release from necrotic neutrophils triggers proinflammatory mediator release. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2015;52(5):554–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Reisenberger K, Egarter C, Vogl S, Sternberger B, Kiss H, Husslein P. The transfer of interleukin-8 across the human placenta perfused in vitro. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(4):613–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Kunkel SL, Standiford T, Kasahara K, Strieter RM. Interleukin-8 (IL-8): the major neutrophil chemotactic factor in the lung. Exp Lung Res. 1991;17(1):17–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Chawes BL, Stokholm J, Bønnelykke K, Brix S, Bisgaard H. Neonates with reduced neonatal lung function have systemic low-grade inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(6):1450–1456.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Thornton NL, Cody MJ, Yost CC. Toll-like receptor ½ stimulation induces elevated interleukin-8 secretion in polymorphonuclear leukocytes isolated from preterm and term newborn infants. Neonatology. 2012;101(2):140–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Carrillo T, Rodriguez de Castro F, Cuevas M, Diaz F, Cabrera P. Effect of cigarette smoking on the humoral immune response in pigeon fanciers. Allergy. 1991;46(4):241–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Holt PG. Immune and inflammatory function in cigarette smokers. Thorax. 1987;42(4):241–249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Janeway CA, Travers P. Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Garland Publishing Inc; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 57. Pitcher-Wilmott RW, Hindocha P, Wood CB. The placental transfer of IgG subclasses in human pregnancy. Clin Exp Immunol. 1980;41(2):303–308. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Joubert BR, Haberg SE, Bell DA, et al. Maternal smoking and DNA methylation in newborns: in utero effect or epigenetic inheritance? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(6):1007–1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
