Skip to main content
Animal Nutrition logoLink to Animal Nutrition
. 2016 Jul 1;2(3):198–203. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2016.06.006

Effects of dietary supplementation of Artemisia argyi aqueous extract on antioxidant indexes of small intestine in broilers

Fei Zhao 1, Binlin Shi 1,, Dengsheng Sun 1, Hongyan Chen 1, Manman Tong 1, Pengfei Zhang 1, Xiaoyu Guo 1, Sumei Yan 1
PMCID: PMC5941037  PMID: 29767092

Abstract

The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of Artemisia argyi aqueous extract (AAE) on antioxidant indexes in the small intestine. A total of 192 Arbor Acre broiler chickens (one-day-old) were randomly divided into 4 treatments with 6 replicates of 8 chickens. These 4 diets were formulated by adding 0, 500, 1,000 and 2,000 mg/kg AAE to the basal diet. The results showed as follows: 1) compared with the control, the total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) in ileum for the 2,000 mg/kg treatment group was significantly increased at 21 days of age (P < 0.05); the T-AOC levels in jejunum and ileum were significantly increased in broilers supplemented with 500 mg/kg AAE at 42 days of age (P < 0.05), and the T-AOC levels in jejunum and ileum were significantly improved in 1,000 mg/kg treatment group (P < 0.01). 2) At 21 days of age, supplementation of 500 mg/kg AAE significantly increased the catalase (CAT) activity of small intestine, and the glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity of jejunum was improved (P < 0.01), meanwhile, the GSH-Px activity of duodenum and the total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) activity of duodenum and jejunum were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05); supplementation of 1,000 mg/kg AAE significantly increased the CAT activity of duodenum and ileum and the GSH-Px activity of duodenum and jejunum (P < 0.05), and the ileum GSH-Px activity was significantly increased (P < 0.01); supplementation of 2,000 mg/kg AAE significantly increased the CAT activity of duodenum and ileum (P < 0.05). At 42 days of age, supplementation of 500 mg/kg AAE significantly increased the GSH-Px activity of ileum and the T-SOD activity of duodenum (P < 0.05), meanwhile, the T-SOD activity of jejunum was significantly increased (P < 0.01); supplementation of 1,000 mg/kg AAE significantly increased the CAT activity of jejunum and the T-SOD activity of ileum (P < 0.01), and the GSH-Px activity of jejunum was significantly increased (P < 0.05); supplementation of 2,000 mg/kg AAE significantly increased the T-SOD activity of ileum (P < 0.05), but significantly decreased the CAT activity of ileum and the GSH-Px activity of jejunum (P < 0.05). 3) The malondialdehyde (MDA) levels of 3 AAE supplementation groups were significantly decreased at 21 and 42 days of age (P < 0.05). The results suggested that dietary supplementation with AAE could improve the antioxidative capacity of small intestine in broilers.

Keywords: Artemisia argyi extract, Broiler, Small intestine, Antioxidant index

1. Introduction

The small intestine is the main organ and place in the digestion and absorption of broiler. Nutrients and water enter the blood and lymph circulation through the intestinal epithelial cells. Therefore, the integrity of the intestinal epithelial cell structure and function is very important to the chicken. However, with the aging of the body, the immunologic function declined and antioxidant capacity gradually weakened from 21 to 42 days in the growth of broiler, resulting in the body's new metabolic dysfunction, free radicals generated excess (Shen and Wang, 2000). When free radicals generated too much or radical scavenging ability declined, accumulation of oxygen free radicals will attack on biofilm polyunsaturated fatty acids, leading to lipid peroxidation, producing metabolites malondialdehyde – malondialdehyde (MDA). However, the MDA can cause proteins, nucleic acids and other vital macromolecules cross-linked polymer, and damage the cell membrane fluidity and permeability, thereby enabling the normal function of membrane damage (Guo et al., 2007).

Artemisia argyi, also known as medical grass, Artemisia argyi grass, perennial herbaceous plants of Compositae artemisia, widely distributed in most areas of our country. Artemisia argyi likes warm and wet conditions, born in the wild land margin, having strong cold and drought resistance. Artemisia argyi grows best in fertile and rich humus place (Zhang et al., 2006). Artemisia argyi contains many kinds of bioactive composition such as volatile oil, flavonoids, eudesmane and triterpene (Zhou et al., 2000), also contains polyunsaturated fatty acid, total phenols matter, vitamin C and essential amino acids (Kim et al., 2015). Studies have reported that Artemisia argyi has strong antioxidative and free radical scavenging capacity (Wu, 2010, Tan et al., 2012; Wu and Extraction, 2008). Wu (2010) reported that dried Folium Artemisia argy and fresh mugwort volatile oil within the range of test concentrations enhanced ability of scavenging the free radical 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (·DPPH), hydroxyl radical (·OH) and superoxide anion free radical (O2), and fresh Artemisia argyi essential oil has a stronger ability of scavenging free radical. Hu et al. (2015) demonstrated that different concentrations of Artemisia argyi polysaccharide has the ability to remove ·OH, O2 and ·DPPH, and between the clearance rate and concentration there is a dose-dependent manner. Wu and Sun (2008) illustrated that flavonoids of Artemisia argyi can effectively remove the H2O2, O2 and ·OH, and its antioxidant effect is much higher than that of vitamin C. In addition, Chu et al. (2015) reported that broilers supplemented with 1,000 mg/kg Artemisia argyi aqueous extract (AAE) can improve the serum superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) in serum decreased. Thus it can be seen that Artemisia argyi antioxidation research mainly concentrate on the volatile oil, polysaccharide, flavonoids and other active ingredients, and AAE on antioxidant research is very rare. Especially, the effect of AAE on antioxidant function of intestinal tissue has not been reported. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the effect of different levels of AAE on antioxidant function of broiler's small intestine, and hope to determine the appropriate supplemental dosage level of AAE in broiler diet.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

Fresh green Artemisia argyi was collected from Huhhot in July. All plants were washed with distilled water and dried at room temperature in the shade. The plant was extracted with distilled water, the extraction was concentrated and lyophilized to obtain the powder, stored at −20 °C. The dose used in the experiment was calculated by air dry powder.

2.2. Experiment design and management

This experiment was used single factorial random experiment, a total of 192 Arbor Acre (AA) broiler chickens (one-day-old) were randomly divided into 4 treatments by initial body weight and sex, and each treatment had 6 replicates with 8 chickens (4 females and 4 males) each. These 4r diets were formulated by adding AAE of 0, 500, 1,000 and 2,000 mg/kg to basal diets. The experiment lasted 42 days, containing 2 periods with 21 days each.

2.3. Basal diet and nutrition level

The basal diet was formulated according to the nutrient requirements recommended by the NY/T 33-2004 (Agricultural Industry Standards of People's Republic of China) for broilers and actual situation in Inner Mongolia, its composition and nutritional levels are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Composition and nutrient levels of basal diet (air-dry basis, %).

Item 1 to 3 weeks 4 to 6 weeks
Corn 51.68 58.49
Soybean meal 41.00 34.30
Soybean oil 3.00 3.00
Dicalcium phosphate 1.90 1.80
Limestone 1.10 1.20
NaCl 0.37 0.37
Lysine (98%) 0.05 0.03
Methionine 0.19 0.10
Premix1 0.71 0.71
Total 100 100
Nutrients levels2
ME, MJ/kg 12.62 12.87
Crude protein 21.84 19.95
Crude fat 5.42 5.56
Calcium 1.00 1.00
Available phosphorus 0.48 0.46
Lysine 1.40 1.20
Methionine 0.56 0.44
L-Cystine 0.40 0.37
1

Premix provided the following per kilogram of diet: VA 6,141.5 IU; VD3 1,789.2 IU; VE 7.99 mg; VK 1.82 mg; VB1 0.65 mg; VB2 3.93 mg; VB6 2.08 mg; VB12 0.01 mg; niacin 18.06 mg; calcium pantothenate 6.65 mg; folic acid 0.59 mg; biotin 0.07 mg; holine chloride 332.28 mg; Fe 60.91 mg; Cu 6.01 mg; Zn 65.75 mg; Mn 62.3 mg; I 0.9 mg; Se 0.21 mg.

2

Crude protein was measured value, while others were all calculated values.

2.4. Feeding and management

The feeding experiment was carried out in Inner Mongolia Agricultural University. The start of the experiment, chicken house, the surrounding environment and test equipment had carried out strict disinfection. Experimental diets and water were available ad libitum during the experimental period. A total of 192 Arbor Acre (AA) broiler chickens (one-day-old) of similar body weight were selected and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 dietary treatments with 6 replicate cages of 8 chicks per cage. Each cage was 100 cm × 100 cm (1 m2 per 8 birds). The temperature was set at 36 °C during the first day, 34 °C during the first week, and was gradually reduced by 3 °C per week to reach a minimum 22 °C at 28 days of age. Relative humidity was between 65% and 75%. During the whole experiment period, air ventilation schedule was maintained. The experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of Animal Care and Use Committee of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University.

2.5. Sample collection and processing

2.5.1. Sample collection

Two broilers were chosen randomly from each replicate group at 21 and 42 day of age which had approximately average weight of the group, and the birds were slaughtered by bleeding the left jugular vein. With medical alcohol cleaning and disinfection of the chest and abdomen, the duodenum, jejunum and ileum tissue were removed. After rinsing clean with physiological saline, the samples were packaged with tin foil paper and stored at −20 °C until analysis of antioxidant index.

2.5.2. Sample processing

The duodenum, jejunum and ileum, which were approximately 3 cm in the middle segment, were taken and rinsed clean with the precooling physiological saline. After filter paper bloted, the samples were accurately weighed and prepared into nine times volume of physiological saline, made of 10% tissue homogenate grinding and slurry at low temperatures. The samples were centrifuged at 1,346 g for 10 min at room temperature, and the supernatant was removed and stored at −20 °C until analysis of antioxidant index.

2.6. Testing index and method

Total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), catalase (CAT), malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and Total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) were measured using commercial assay kits provided by Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute: Xanthine oxidase method; GSH-Px: DTNB direct chromatometry; CAT: Ammonium molybdate method; MDA: TBA method), and the total protein content was determined by Coomassie brilliant blue method.

2.7. Statistical analysis

The data were preliminary collated by Excel 2007, and the 4 treatment means were compared by ANOVA, using the Duncan's multiple range tests, and P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant, and P < 0.01 was considered to be extremely significant difference.

3. Result

3.1. Changes of T-AOC level in small intestine

As Table 2 shows, compared with the control, the T-AOC level of ileum in 2,000 mg/kg group was significantly increased at 21 days of age (P < 0.05), while the other group compared with the control group, there was no significant difference between feeding AAE and without AAE. At 42 days of age, the T-AOC level of duodenum showed no significant difference; supplementation of 500 mg/kg AAE significantly increased the T-AOC level of jejunum and ileum (P < 0.05); and the T-AOC level of jejunum and ileum in 1,000 mg/kg group was significantly increased (P < 0.01).

Table 2.

Effects of Artemisia argyi aqueous extract on total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) levels (U/mg prot) of broiler's small intestine.

Time Intestinal tissue Artemisia argyi aqueous extract supplemental levels, mg/kg
P-value
0 500 1,000 2,000
21 d Duodenum 1.10 ± 0.077 1.00 ± 0.061 1.06 ± 0.127 1.01 ± 0.074 0.276
Jejunum 2.39 ± 0.132 2.50 ± 0.266 2.69 ± 0.165 2.15 ± 0.589 0.260
Ileum 2.82 ± 0.159b 2.44 ± 0.227b 2.71 ± 0.494b 3.52 ± 0.604a 0.023
42 d Duodenum 0.91 ± 0.072 0.94 ± 0.046 0.83 ± 0.091 0.82 ± 0.094 0.126
Jejunum 0.68 ± 0.090c 0.86 ± 0.096b 1.12 ± 0.163a 0.74 ± 0.059bc <0.001
Ileum 0.77 ± 0.045c 0.94 ± 0.140b 1.12 ± 0.102a 0.90 ± 0.026bc 0.005

a,b,c In the same row, values with no letter or the same superscript letters mean no significant difference (P > 0.05), while adjacent different letters mean significant difference (P < 0.05), and the interphase letters mean extremely significant difference (P < 0.01).

3.2. Changes of CAT activity in small intestine

As Table 3 shows, compared with the control, at 21 days of age, the CAT activity of small intestine in 500 mg/kg group was significantly increased (P < 0.01); supplementation of 1,000 and 2,000 mg/kg AAE significantly increased the CAT activity of duodenum and ileum (P < 0.05). At 42 days of age, the CAT activity of duodenum was no significant difference; broilers fed the diets containing 1,000 mg/kg AAE had higher jejunum CAT activity (P < 0.05); but the CAT activity of ileum in 2,000 mg/kg group was significantly decreased (P < 0.05).

Table 3.

Effects of Artemisia argyi aqueous extract on catalase (CAT) levels (U/mg prot) of broiler's small intestine.

Time Intestinal tissue Artemisia argyi aqueous extract supplemental levels, mg/kg
P-value
0 500 1,000 2,000
21 d Duodenum 0.62 ± 0.200c 3.57 ± 0.468a 1.25 ± 0.179b 1.27 ± 0.433b <0.001
Jejunum 2.53 ± 0.695bc 4.79 ± 0.465a 3.60 ± 0.496b 2.34 ± 0.951c 0.003
Ileum 1.35 ± 0.255c 2.82 ± 0.065a 1.71 ± 0.100b 1.78 ± 0.160b <0.001
42 d Duodenum 0.84 ± 0.079 0.90 ± 0.286 0.69 ± 0.177 0.98 ± 0.144 0.284
Jejunum 1.94 ± 0.299c 1.94 ± 0.051c 3.20 ± 0.363a 1.77 ± 0.286c <0.001
Ileum 2.72 ± 0.437a 2.39 ± 0.164ab 2.34 ± 0.294ab 1.86 ± 0.209b 0.045

a,b,c In the same row, values with no letter or the same superscript letters mean no significant difference (P > 0.05), while adjacent different letters mean significant difference (P < 0.05), and the interphase letters mean extremely significant difference (P < 0.01).

3.3. Changes of GSH-Px activity in small intestine

As Table 4 shows, compared with the control, at 21 days of age, supplementation of 500 mg/kg AAE significantly increased the GSH-Px activity of duodenum (P < 0.05) and significantly increased the GSH-Px activity of jejunum (P < 0.01); supplementation of 1,000 mg/kg AAE significantly increased the GSH-Px activity ​of duodenum and jejunum (P < 0.05) and significantly increased the ileum GSH-Px activity (P < 0.01); but the GSH-Px activity of small intestine in 2,000 mg/kg group showed no significant change. At 42 days of age, the GSH-Px activity of duodenum was not significantly different; the GSH-Px activity of ileum in 500 mg/kg group and the jejunum GSH-Px activity in 1,000 mg/kg group were significantly increased (P < 0.05); but the GSH-Px activity of jejunum in 2,000 mg/kg group was significantly reduced (P < 0.05).

Table 4.

Effects of Artemisia argyi aqueous extract on glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity (U) of broiler's small intestine.

Time Intestinal tissue Artemisia argyi aqueous extract supplemental levels, mg/kg
P-value
0 500 1,000 2,000
21 d Duodenum 6.69 ± 0.187b 8.84 ± 0.972a 9.44 ± 0.982a 7.23 ± 0.991b 0.013
Jejunum 4.67 ± 0.436c 36.20 ± 1.574a 12.02 ± 2.103b 2.13 ± 0.348c <0.001
Ileum 11.71 ± 0.795c 12.94 ± 1.053c 26.71 ± 4.446a 13.73 ± 1.648c <0.001
42 d Duodenum 7.35 ± 0.188 6.03 ± 0.927 6.38 ± 0.097 7.05 ± 1.236 0.228
Jejunum 6.67 ± 0.237b 6.89 ± 1.550b 8.94 ± 1.710a 4.80 ± 0.534c 0.004
Ileum 15.39 ± 1.611bc 20.23 ± 1.771a 16.15 ± 1.512b 12.80 ± 1.581c <0.001

a,b,c In the same row, values with no letter or the same superscript letters mean no significant difference (P > 0.05), while adjacent different letters mean significant difference (P < 0.05), and the interphase letters mean extremely significant difference (P < 0.01).

3.4. Changes of T-SOD activity in small intestine

As Table 5 shows, compared with the control, at 21 days of age, supplementation of ​500 mg/kg AAE significantly increased the T-SOD activity of duodenum and jejunum (P < 0.05). However, the T-SOD activity of small intestine in 1,000 and 2,000 mg/kg group showed no significant difference. At 42 days of age, supplementation of 500 mg/kg AAE significantly increased the T-SOD activity of duodenum (P < 0.05) and significantly increased the jejunum T-SOD activity (P < 0.01); the T-SOD of ileum in 1,000 mg/kg group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.01); broilers supplemented with 2,000 mg/kg AAE had higher T-SOD activity of the ileum tissue (P < 0.05).

Table 5.

Effects of Artemisia argyi aqueous extract on total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) activity (U/mg prot) of broiler's small intestine.

Time Intestinal tissue Artemisia argyi aqueous extract supplemental levels, mg/kg
P-value
0 500 1,000 2,000
21 d Duodenum 254.92 ± 6.779b 291.61 ± 15.718a 270.72 ± 13.320ab 268.21 ± 13.492ab 0.041
Jejunum 124.56 ± 8.244b 154.01 ± 15.007a 142.96 ± 10.905ab 119.79 ± 12.302b 0.025
Ileum 58.18 ± 4.460 59.59 ± 9.354 64.69 ± 4.451 63.49 ± 10.734 0.671
42 d Duodenum 275.63 ± 4.248b 319.43 ± 25.423a 296.07 ± 11.549ab 290.00 ± 3.588b 0.032
Jejunum 202.61 ± 8.602c 251.69 ± 3.431a 208.97 ± 16.011c 208.97 ± 3.713c <0.001
Ileum 162.72 ± 6.469c 165.49 ± 29.113bc 227.90 ± 4.971a 196.87 ± 9.335ab <0.001

a,b,cIn the same row, values with no letter or the same superscript letters mean no significant difference (P > 0.05), while adjacent different letters mean significant difference (P < 0.05), and the interphase letters mean extremely significant difference (P < 0.01).

3.5. Changes in the content of lipid peroxidation products in small intestine

As Table 6 shows, the content of MDA in each treatment group was lower than that in the control group. As the statistical data show, compared with the control, at 21 days of age, the MDA content of duodenum in 500 mg/kg addition group was significantly reduced (P < 0.01), but the MDA content of jejunum and ileum had no significant difference; supplementation of 1,000 mg/kg AAE significantly reduced the small intestine MDA content (P < 0.05); the MDA content of duodenum and jejunum in 2,000 mg/kg group was significantly reduced (P < 0.05), however, the MDA content of ileum had no significant difference. At 42 days of age, the MDA content of small intestine in 500 and 1,000 mg/kg group was significantly reduced (P < 0.05); the duodenum and ileum MDA content in 2,000 mg/kg group was significantly decreased (P < 0.01), but the MDA content of jejunum had no significant difference.

Table 6.

Effects of Artemisia argyi aqueous extract on malondialdehyde (MDA) levels (nmoL/mg prot) of broiler's small intestine.

Time Intestinal tissue Artemisia argyi aqueous extract supplemental levels, mg/kg
P-value
0 500 1,000 2,000
21 d Duodenum 1.11 ± 0.157a 0.37 ± 0.073c 0.59 ± 0.081b 0.54 ± 0.001bc <0.001
Jejunum 1.60 ± 0.160a 1.55 ± 0.331a 0.99 ± 0.172b 1.08 ± 0.175b 0.019
Ileum 1.45 ± 0.060a 1.08 ± 0.233a 0.64 ± 0.189b 1.09 ± 0.284a 0.010
42 d Duodenum 1.41 ± 0.172c 1.29 ± 0.164ab 1.09 ± 0.112b 0.59 ± 0.160a <0.001
Jejunum 0.31 ± 0.092a 0.16 ± 0.028b 0.18 ± 0.032b 0.23 ± 0.027ab 0.014
Ileum 0.65 ± 0.075a 0.52 ± 0.032b 0.44 ± 0.080bc 0.37 ± 0.025c <0.001

a,b,c In the same row, values with no letter or the same superscript letters mean no significant difference (P > 0.05), while adjacent different letters mean significant difference (P < 0.05), and the interphase letters mean extremely significant difference (P < 0.01).

4. Disscussion

4.1. Effects of AAE on the level of T-AOC of small intestine in broilers

Total antioxidant capacity is a main index to measure the total antioxidant level of enzymatic system and non-enzymatic system (Wang et al., 2009). Its antioxidant role mainly through three ways: 1) elimination of free radicals and reactive oxygen species to prevent lipid peroxidation; 2) degradation of peroxidation products and blocking the oxidative chain; 3) removal of metal ions from the catalytic reaction. The present experiment showed that the diets containing AAE can improve the total antioxidant capacity of small intestine in broiler, and the 1,000 mg/kg treatment group had the highest level of small intestine T-AOC at 42 days of age. However, there are not a lot of reports about the effects of Artemisia plants on total antioxidant capacity of small intestine in broilers. This finding may be caused from Artemisia argyi containing bioactive substances, such as flavonoids (Wu and Extraction, 2008) and polysaccharides (Lan et al., 2010, Xiong, 2011) which can remove excess free radicals of intestine tissue and raise the T-AOC level of small intestine and protect the normal function of the small intestine epithelial cells.

4.2. Effects of AAE on antioxidant enzyme activity of small intestine in broilers

Catalase, total superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase are not only the main antioxidant enzymes that can removal the super oxygen free radical, superoxide and hydrogen peroxide, but also can reduce or prevent the formation of free radicals (Wang et al., 2012). In the process of animal metabolism, O2 production and cleaning is a process of dynamic equilibrium. The elimination of O2 is completely dependent on the whole antioxidant defense system of the body (Wang, 2010). Super oxygen anion and hydrogen ions generated hydrogen peroxide under the action of SOD; and then hydrogen peroxide eventually turns into H2O under the action of CAT or GSH-Px. Therefore, the synergistic effect of SOD and CAT or GSH-Px can effectively eliminate free radicals. The experimental results showed that diets supplemented with AAE can improve the antioxidant enzymes activity (CAT, T-SOD and GSH-Px), and consequently improve antioxidant capacity of small intestinal tissue. This means that AAE is a kind of effective free radical scavenger that can enhance the antioxidant capacity of small intestinal tissue. This may because of Artemisia argyi containing bioactive substances, such as flavonoids materials and polysaccharide has the very good radical scavenging capacity and antioxidant effect (Wu and Extraction, 2008, Lan et al., 2010).

The results of the above experiments were in agreement with previous studies. Chu et al. (2015) illustrated that the diets containing 1,000 mg/kg AAE improved the SOD activity in broiler chickens. Zhang et al. (2011) reported that added Artemisia japonica extract (AJE) improved the GSH-Px and SOD activity of liver in mice. He et al. (2009) concluded that Artemisia argyi volatile oil can enhance the serum SOD activity in mice. In addition, Repetto et al. (2003) demonstrated that Dow moxa extracts showed significant antioxidant effect in vitro and in vivo. Huh et al. (2003) illustrated that oral administration of 40 mg/kg DA-9601 (a kind of alcohol extract of artemisia Asia) can significantly reduce alcohol induced rat gastrointestinal mucosa hemorrhagic injury and lipid peroxidation.

4.3. Effect of AAE on the MDA content of small intestine in broilers

Malondialdehyde is an animal body end product of lipid peroxidation that can cause proteins, nucleic acids and other vital macromolecules cross-linked polymer, and has cytotoxicity, meanwhile, its content can reflect the degree of cell damage. The present experiment showed that diets containing AAE significantly reduced the MDA content of small intestine in broilers. With the increase of AAE dosage, MDA content in small intestine tissue decreased. This means that the AAE can effectively reduce the lipid peroxidation, and protect the normal function of the small intestine. This finding was in agreement with the results of Qiao et al. (2011) and Chu et al. (2015).

5. Conclusion

The test results showed that feeding AAE increased the antioxidant capabilities of small intestine tissue in broilers. At 21 days of age, supplementation of ​ 500 mg/kg AAE improved the intestinal tissue antioxidant enzymes activity, especially the activity of CAT. At 42 days of age, the antioxidant function of small intestinal in 1,000 mg/kg group had the best promotion effect.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine.

References

  1. Chu W.B., Shi B.L., Yan S.M., Zhang P.F., Zhao F., Sun D.S. Effect of Artemisiae argyi extract on immune and antioxidative function in broilers. Chin J Animal Sci. 2015;51(19):67–70. [Google Scholar]
  2. Guo X.Q., Shan A.S., Zhao Y., Yan C.J., Wang H.Y. Effect of aqueous extract of Ligustrum lucidum on antioxidant indices of AA broilers. Chin J Animal Nutr. 2007;19(1):81–85. [Google Scholar]
  3. He R.X., Long X.M., Liu X.X. Effects of volatile oil from Artemisiae argyi on physiological and biochemical indexes in mice. J Traditional Chin Veterinary Med. 2009;5:15–17. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hu G., Yin M.Z., Yu X., Chen C.Y. Effects of polysaccharides from artemisiae argyi folum on the antioxidation in vitro. Lishizhen Med Materia Medica Res. 2015;11:2650–2651. [Google Scholar]
  5. Huh K., Kwon T.H., Shin U.S., Kim W.B., Ahn B.O., Oh T.Y. Inhibitory effects of DA-9601 on ethanol-induced gastrohemorrhagic lesions and gastric xanthine oxidase activity in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003;88(2–3):269–273. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(03)00235-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kim J.K., Shin E.C., Lim H.J., Choi S.J., Kim C.R., Suh S.H. Characterization of nutritional composition, antioxidative capacity, and sensory attributes of seomae mugwort, a native Korean variety of Artemisia argyi H. Lev. & Vaniot. J Anal Methods Chem. 2015;2015(4):1–9. doi: 10.1155/2015/916346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lan Min-Bo, Zhang Yan-Hong, Zheng Ying, Yuan Hui-Hui, Zhao Hong-Li, Gao Feng. Antioxidant and immunomodulatory activities of polysaccharides from moxa (Artemisia argyi) leaf. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2010;19(6):1463–1469. [Google Scholar]
  8. Qiao G.H., Zhou X.H., Li Y., Zhang H.S., Li J.H., Wang C.M. Effect of several supplemental Chinese herbs additives on rumen fermentation, antioxidant function and nutrient digestibility in sheep. J Anim Physiol A Anim Nutr. 2011;96(5):930–938. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01211.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Repetto M., Maria A., Guzman J., Giordano O., Llesuy S. Protective effect of Artemisia douglasiana Besser extracts in gastric mucosal injury. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2003;55(4):551–557. doi: 10.1211/002235702919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shen R.L., Wang J.D. Effect of Chinese herb additive on antioxidation and production performance in laying hens. Chin J Veterinary Sci Technol. 2000;30(5):27–29. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tan B., Yan H.N., Huang S.Y., Liao H.X., Zhang Q. Study on the extraction of polysaccharides from Artemisiae argyi folum and the effects on scavenging of hydroxyl radicals. China Licens Pharm. 2012;9(3):10–13. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang H.F. Agricultural University of HEBEI; Bao Ding: 2010. Effect of Astragalus polysaccharides on performance, antioxidant enzyme activity, immuntiy enginery and intestined microflora of lying hens; pp. 25–26. Master Thesis. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang P.Z., Li Y., Chen X., Zhao W., Shu J., Zhang Z.H. Effects of seabuckthorn flavonoids on the antioxidant capacity under heat stress in broilers. China Feed. 2009;15:27–29. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang Q.X., Lin H., Jia H.Q., Zhang Z.T., Wang C.K. Effects of Lactobacillin on serum biochemical indices and antioxidant function in broilers. Chin J Animal Nutr. 2012;24(1):131–136. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wu G.H. East China University of Science and Technology; Shang Hai: 2010. Research on extraction process and bioactivity of the volatile oil and polysaccharide from Artemisia argyi; pp. 19–24. Master Thesis. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wu N. Huazhong Agricultural University; Wu Han: 2008. Extraction, purification and antioxidation of flavonoids from Artemisia argyi; pp. 54–61. Master Thesis. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wu N., Sun Z.D. Study on antioxidant activity in vitro and protection against DNA oxidative damage of flavonoids of Artemisiae argyi. Food Sci. 2008;29(10):47–50. [Google Scholar]
  18. Xiong Z.W. Nanchang University; Nan Chang: 2011. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of Artemisia lavandulaefolia; pp. 12–22. Master Thesis. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang Z.X., Zhang X.P., Liu H.J., Shao J.W., Yang K.J., Zhang X.W. Studies on the allelopathic effects of artemisia lavandulaefolia. J Anhui Normal Univ Nat Sci. 2006;29(6):579–581. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhang D.H., Cheng P.F., Ling L. Antioxidation and genetic toxicity of artenisia japonica extract. Nat Prod Res Dev. 2011;23(1):39–42. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhou F., Qin L.P., Lian J.F., Zhen Q.M. Chemical constituents, biological activities and plant resources of Folium Artemisia argyi. J Pharm Pract. 2000;2:96–98. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Animal Nutrition are provided here courtesy of KeAi Publishing

RESOURCES