Phase 2 study of eribulin in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma

This phase 2 study investigated eribulin in previously treated Japanese patients with advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Eribulin showed clinical activity together with a manageable safety profile.

Abstract

Objective

Eribulin, a microtubule dynamics inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of patients with breast cancer and soft tissue sarcoma. We investigated the efficacy and safety of eribulin in Japanese patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

Methods

This open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized, Phase 2 study enrolled Japanese patients with measurable, advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma of high/intermediate grade and ≥1 prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. Patients received eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m² intravenously over 2–5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free rate at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival and safety. Efficacy analyses were stratified by histology (liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma, and other subtypes).

Results

Overall, 52 patients were enrolled and 51 patients were treated. Patients with liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma (n = 35) had similar characteristics to those with other subtypes (n = 16), except for a higher proportion of women (63% vs 38%, respectively) and patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 (57% vs 44%). Progression-free rate at 12 weeks was 60% in liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma patients, 31% in other subtypes and 51% overall. Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months in liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma patients, 2.0 months in other subtypes and 4.1 months overall. Median overall survival was 17.0 months in liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma patients, 7.6 months in other subtypes and 13.2 months overall. The most common Grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (86%), leukopenia (75%), lymphopenia (33%), anemia (14%) and febrile neutropenia (8%).

Conclusion

Eribulin showed clinical activity with a manageable safety profile in previously treated Japanese patients with advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

Introduction

Sarcomas are rare solid tumors associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The yearly incidence of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) is estimated at 3–5 per 100,000 (1, 2). STS is a heterogeneous group of tumors, including over 50 histological subtypes with varying outcomes in terms of chemosensitivity and survival (3). Chemotherapy is the most commonly used treatment option in patients with advanced, metastatic or inoperable STS. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy has been used as first-line chemotherapy. Ifosfamide (4, 5), pazopanib (6) and trabectedin (7, 8) are therapeutic options after the failure of first-line chemotherapy in Japan, but the prognosis remains poor (9, 10).

Eribulin mesilate is a fully synthetic, optimized analog of halichondrin B, originally isolated from the marine sponge Halichondria okadai. Eribulin is a microtubule dynamics inhibitor that induces irreversible mitotic blockade by binding with high affinity to tubulin at the plus (growing) ends of microtubules, with minimal effect on microtubule shortening (11–13). Eribulin is approved as monotherapy for the treatment of inoperable and recurrent breast cancer in Japan.

The efficacy and safety of eribulin in sarcoma have been demonstrated in a Phase 2 study conducted by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) enrolling patients with progressive or high-grade STS, including liposarcoma (LPS; also known as adipocytic sarcoma), leiomyosarcoma (LMS), synovial sarcoma and other sarcomas. The progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 weeks was 32% for LMS and 47% for LPS, suggesting that further investigations with eribulin are warranted in these common STS subtypes (14). Based on these results, a randomized Phase 3 study (NCT01327885) compared eribulin with dacarbazine in previously treated patients with advanced LPS/LMS (15). In that study, the primary endpoint of OS was significantly longer for eribulin compared with dacarbazine (median OS: 13.5 vs 11.5 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62–0.95]; P = 0.0169). The adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the safety profile reported from the previous findings, and eribulin had a manageable tolerability (15). Based on the results of this pivotal Phase 3 trial, eribulin received approval as monotherapy for the treatment of STS in Japan and unresectable or metastatic LPS in the USA and Europe. However, because Japanese patients were not included in these sarcoma studies, the data for this population remain lacking. The current Phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of eribulin in Japanese patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic STS, including LPS, LMS and other defined subtypes.

Material and methods

Study design

In this open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized, Phase 2 study, patients received eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m² (equivalent to eribulin 1.23 mg/m² [expressed as free base]), administered intravenously over 2–5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle until disease progression, intolerance or withdrawal of consent. In case of toxicity, treatment was delayed or the eribulin mesilate dose was reduced to 1.1 or 0.7 mg/m² (equivalent to eribulin 0.97 or 0.62 mg/m², respectively, [expressed as free base]; Online Supplementary Table S1). Re-escalation was not permitted.

The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the relevant Institutional Review Boards of all participating institutions. All patients provided written informed consent.

Patients

Eligible patients aged 20 years and greater had histologically or cytologically confirmed, measurable, advanced or metastatic STS of high or intermediate grade; had received ≥1 standard chemotherapy for advanced disease (anthracycline, ifosfamide or combination); had documented disease progression within 6 months before study enrollment; had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 or 1; and had adequate bone marrow, renal and liver function. Ineligible histologies included embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, neuroblastoma, malignant mesothelioma and mixed mesodermal tumors of the uterus. In addition to standard exclusion criteria, patients were ineligible if they had significant cardiovascular impairment, pre-existing peripheral neuropathy exceeding Grade 2 or had any toxicity > Grade 1 (except for peripheral neuropathy or alopecia) related to prior anticancer therapy.

Study assessments

Tumor response was evaluated every 6 weeks according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) (16) until progressive disease was confirmed and at week 12. Tumor assessment was performed by an independent review committee. Responses were confirmed at least 4 weeks after the first observation of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).

AEs were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). AEs that emerged during treatment (from the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose) were recorded. Serious AEs that occurred on study and up until 30 days after the last dose of the study drug were recorded, regardless of their relationship to study treatment.

Statistical analysis

The primary endpoint was the progression-free rate at 12 weeks after start of therapy (PFR_12wks) and is presented with exact CIs using the binomial distribution. PFR_12wks is the recommended endpoint for Phase 2 studies of STSs (17) and has been used in other previous studies (14, 18). Secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, objective response rate (ORR; comprising CR or PR of best overall response) and safety.

The primary analysis set for efficacy and safety evaluations consisted of all patients who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug. Efficacy analyses were conducted by disease subtype (LPS or LMS [LPS/LMS] and other subtypes [OTH]), and were performed secondarily for all patients combined. No formal comparisons between strata were planned.

PFR_12wks was defined as the proportion of patients with PFS (“success”) measured as a binary variable based on the tumor response assessed at Week 12 after the start of treatment. Eribulin treatment was considered a “success” if a radiological evaluation ≥12 weeks after start of therapy indicated stable disease or objective response; all other outcomes were classified as treatment failure.

Statistical analyses were performed with SAS (version 9.3). The planned sample size was approximately 35 patients with LPS/LMS, with ≥5 patients for each histological subtype together with 16–20 patients with OTH for a total of 51–55 patients, to allow adequately powered analysis based on the 1-sample binomial distribution. The required number of patients with LPS/LMS was determined to ensure 80% power to reject the threshold PFR_12wks; P₀ of ≤20% if the expected PFR_12wks; P₁ of ≥40% is true, with a one-sided Type I error rate (α) of 0.05 (17). The number of patients with OTH was determined based on the P₀ of ≤15% and the P₁ = 35–40%, with a one-sided α of <0.1. Accrual of 16 patients provided a power of 71–83%. Synovial sarcoma, pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma and rhabdomyosarcoma were mainly enrolled as OTH sarcomas in this study. These histological subtypes are generally higher grade malignancy and have poorer prognosis, compared with LPS/LMS. Therefore, we set P₀ = 15% and P₁ = 35–40% conservatively as not to underestimate the efficacy for the OTH group.

This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01458249. The first patient was enrolled on 14 November 2011, and the cutoff date for analysis was 14 November 2014.

Results

Patients

Fifty-two eligible Japanese patients were enrolled at 13 sites in Japan between November 2011 and December 2012—51 of whom received treatment and were included in all analyses. One patient did not receive treatment because of infection and poor control of anemia (Fig. 1). Patients had a median age of 52 years (range: 28–73), and 28 (55%) were female (Table 1). Time since first diagnosis varied widely but was most commonly 2–5 years (in 47% of patients). Patients in the LPS/LMS stratum (n = 35) had similar baseline characteristics to those with OTH (n = 16) except for a higher proportion of women (63% vs 38%; respectively), a higher proportion of patients with an ECOG PS of 0 (57% vs 44%), and differences in the primary disease site (Table 1). Patients had received a median of 2 (range: 1–7) prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced/metastatic disease; all patients had received prior anthracycline.

Figure 1.

Patient disposition and primary reason for discontinuation.

Table 1.

Patient and disease characteristics^a

Parameter	Liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma (n = 35)	Other histologies (n = 16)	All patients (n = 51)
Median age, years (range)	50 (29–73)	54 (28–71)	52 (28–73)
Sex, n (%)
Female	22 (63)	6 (38)	28 (55)
Male	13 (37)	10 (63)	23 (45)
ECOG PS, n (%)
0	20 (57)	7 (44)	27 (53)
1	15 (43)	9 (56)	24 (47)
Median time since initial diagnosis, years (range)	3 (0–10)	2 (0–7)	3 (0–10)
Site of primary lesion, n (%)
Appendix	0	1 (6)	1 (2.0)
Connective and soft tissue	13 (37)	9 (56)	22 (43)
Retroperitoneum and peritoneum	14 (40)	1 (6)	15 (29)
Uterusc	7 (20)	2 (13)	9 (18)
Mediastinum	1 (3)	1 (6)	2 (4)
Large intestine (excluding appendix)	0	1 (6)	1 (2)
Nasal cavity	0	1 (6)	1 (2)
Disease histology
Liposarcomab	16 (46)	0	16 (31)
Leiomyosarcoma	19 (54)	0	19 (37)
Alveolar soft part sarcoma	0	1 (6)	1 (2)
Endometrial stromal sarcoma	0	2 (13)	2 (4)
Fibrosarcoma	0	2 (13)	2 (4)
MFH	0	3 (19)	3 (6)
MPNST	0	1 (6)	1 (2)
Rhabdomyosarcoma	0	2 (13)	2 (4)
Solitary fibrous tumor	0	2 (13)	2 (4)
Synovial sarcoma	0	3 (19)	3 (6)
Tumor grade, n (%)
Intermediate	9 (26)	4 (25)	13 (26)
High	26 (74)	12 (75)	38 (75)
Median number of prior chemotherapy regimens for advanced/metastatic disease (range)	2 (1–7)	2 (1–6)	2 (1–7)
Drug classd
Anthracycline	35 (100)	16 (100)	51 (100)
Ifosfamide	25 (71)	11 (69)	36 (71)
Docetaxel	15 (43)	7 (44)	22 (43)
Gemcitabine	15 (43)	6 (38)	21 (41)
Etoposide	5 (14)	2 (13)	7 (14)
Dacarbazine	5 (14)	1 (6)	6 (12)
Platinum agent	5 (14)	1 (6)	6 (12)
TNM classification
T classification
Tx	31 (89)	13 (81)	44 (86)
T0	0	0	0
T1:T1a	0	0	0
T1:T1b	1 (3)	1 (6)	2 (4)
T2:T2a	0	0	0
T2:T2b	3 (9)	2 (13)	5 (10)
N classification
Nx	7 (20)	6 (38)	13 (26)
N0	26 (74)	7 (44)	33 (65)
N1	2 (6)	3 (19)	5 (10)
M classification
Mx	0	1 (6)	1 (2)
M0	0	0	0
M1	35 (100)	15 (94)	50 (98)

^an = 51; full analysis set.

^bMyxoid liposarcoma (n = 9), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (n = 6) and well differentiated liposarcoma (n = 1).

^cIncludes corpus uteri (n = 7) and uterus not otherwise specified (n = 2).

^dThe most common drug classes/agents are shown.

Data are number (in percentage) unless otherwise stated. Percentages may not total 100 because of rounding.Full analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug.ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; MFH, malignant fibrous histiocytoma; MPNST, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor; TNM, tumor, node, metastasis.

Study drug exposure

The median number of eribulin cycles administered was four (range: 1–49). Patients in the LPS/LMS and OTH strata received a median of 7 and 2.5 cycles, respectively. Almost all patients of both strata discontinued treatment because of disease progression (LPS/LMS, 30/35 patients, 85.7%; OTH: 14/16 patients, 87.5%). The median relative dose intensity was virtually identical in both strata (88.0% and 88.5%, respectively). Eribulin drug delays and dose reductions each occurred in 16 (31%) patients, and dose interruptions occurred in 19 (37%) patients. There were no major protocol deviations.

Efficacy

PFR_12wks in the LPS/LMS stratum was 60% (21/35 patients; 95% CI: 42–76%), 31% in OTH (5/16 patients; 95% CI: 11–59%) and 51% (26/51 patients; 95% CI: 37–65%) in all patients. The median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI: 2.8–8.2) in the LPS/LMS stratum, 2.0 months (95% CI: 1.2–4.1) in OTH and 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.6–5.6) overall (Table 2 and Fig. 2A). In an exploratory analysis by disease subtype, PFR_12wks was 81% (13/16 patients; 95% CI: 54–96%) in LPS, and 42% (8/19 patients; 95% CI: 20–67%) in LMS; corresponding values for median PFS were 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.1–8.4) and 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.3–8.2), respectively (Online Supplementary Table S2). A total of seven patients (44%) with LPS and six patients (32%) with LMS exceeded 6 months for PFS (Online Supplementary Figures S1 and S2). PFR_12wks was achieved by seven of nine patients (77.8%) with myxoid LPS and five of six patients (83.3%) with dedifferentiated LPS. One patient with well differentiated LPS also achieved PFR_12wks. In the OTH category, two patients with endometrial stromal sarcoma, one patient with synovial sarcoma, one patient with solitary fibrous tumor and one patient with fibrosarcoma achieved PFR_12wks (Online Supplementary Figure S3).

Table 2.

Efficacy outcomes following eribulin treatment^a

Outcome	Liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma (n = 35)	Other histologies (n = 16)	All patients (n = 51)
PFR12wks, n (%), [95% CI]	21 (60) [42–76]	5 (31) [11–59]	26 (51) [37–65]
PFR12wks, n (%), [90% CI]b	21 (60) [48–100]	5 (31) [16–100]	26 (51) [41–100]
Median PFS, months (95% CI)	5.5 (2.8–8.2)	2.0 (1.2–4.1)	4.1 (2.6–5.6)
Median OS, months (95% CI)	17.0 (11.0–20.5)	7.6 (3.8–16.1)	13.2 (9.5–18.3)
OS rate at % (95% CI):
6 months	83 (66–92)	69 (41–86)	78 (64–87)
12 months	57 (39–72)	44 (20–66)	53 (39–66)
18 months	46 (29–61)	19 (5–40)	37 (24–50)
24 months	31 (17–47)	19 (5–40)	28 (16–40)
Best overall response, n (%)
ORR (95% CI)	0 (0–10)	0 (0–21)	0 (0–7)
Complete response	0	0	0
Partial response	0	0	0
Stable disease	28 (80)	8 (50)	36 (71)
≥11 weeks	26 (74)	8 (50)	34 (67)
Progressive disease	7 (20)	8 (50)	15 (29)

^an = 51; full analysis set.

^bOne-sided 90% CI calculated using the exact method of binomial distribution.

Full analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug.CI, confidence interval; PFR_12wks, progression-free rate at 12 weeks; PFS, progression-free survival; ORR, objective response rate (complete or partial response); OS, overall survival.

Figure 2.

Kaplan–Meier plots of (a) progression-free survival and (b) overall survival following eribulin treatment. LMS, leiomyosarcoma; LPS, liposarcoma; OS, overall survival; OTH, other soft tissue sarcoma subtypes; PFS, progression-free survival.

In total, 38 of 51 (75%) patients had died at database cutoff date (25/35 [71%] patients in the LPS/LMS stratum, 13/16 [81%] patients with OTH). The median OS was 17.0 months in the LPS/LMS stratum (95% CI: 11.0–20.5), 7.6 months in OTH (95% CI: 3.8–16.1) and 13.2 months (95% CI: 9.5–18.3) in total (Table 2, Fig. 2B, and Online Supplementary Table S2). No CRs or PRs were observed, giving an ORR of 0% (Table 2 and Online Supplementary Table S2). However, tumor shrinkage was observed in 18 patients (15 of them in the LPS/LMS stratum). Thirty-four (67%) patients achieved stable disease for ≥11 weeks, including 26 (74%) in the LPS/LMS stratum and 8 (50%) with OTH (Table 2).

Safety and tolerability

All treated patients experienced ≥1 AE (Table 3). Of these, the most common AEs (occurring in ≥30% of patients) were leukopenia (100% of patients), neutropenia (98%), lymphopenia (78%), anemia (47%), cancer pain (45%), nausea and pyrexia (41% each), malaise (39%), and constipation and peripheral neuropathy (31% each). All treated patients experienced ≥1 treatment-related AE. The most frequent Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs (data not shown) were neutropenia (86% of patients), leukopenia (75%), lymphopenia (31%), anemia (12%) and febrile neutropenia (8%). Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was not used prophylactically in this study. Serious AEs were reported in 15 (29%) patients and were treatment-related in 5 (10%) patients, with events including febrile neutropenia, streptococcal infection, infectious pleural effusion, pulmonary embolism, hepatic hemorrhage and tumor hemorrhage. One fatal cardiac failure during the study was considered unrelated to study drug but was attributed to prior doxorubicin treatment; otherwise, there were no treatment-related deaths (or Grade 5 AEs). Four (8%) patients experienced AEs that led to withdrawal of eribulin, including two events that were probably treatment-related (infectious pleural effusion and interstitial lung disease). The eribulin dose was reduced because of neutropenia in 13 (26%) patients. Overall, 16 (31%) patients had treatment-related AEs necessitating dose reduction. New or worsened Grade 1–2 peripheral neuropathy developed in 16 (31%) patients with a median time to onset of 27 weeks. Neuropathy was the reason for dose reduction in one patient after 216 days on study.

Table 3.

Most frequent adverse events in patients treated with eribulin, and the respective proportions of those patients with Grade 3 or higher severity

Adverse event, n (%)	In ≥10% of patients
	All grades	Grade ≥3
Any adverse event	51 (100)	49 (96)
Hematological
Anemia	24 (47)	7 (14)
Leukopenia	51 (100)	38 (75)
Lymphopenia	40 (78)	17 (33)
Neutropenia	50 (98)	44 (86)
Gastrointestinal
Constipation	16 (31)	0
Diarrhea	7 (14)	0
Nausea	21 (41)	0
Stomatitis	13 (26)	0
General and administration site
Fatigue	9 (18)	0
Malaise	20 (39)	0
Edema peripheral	5 (10)	0
Pyrexia	21 (41)	1 (2)
Hepatobiliary
Hepatic function abnormal	5 (10)	0
Infections
Nasopharyngitis	11 (22)	0
Upper respiratory tract infection	11 (22)	0
Investigations
ALT elevation	14 (28)	3 (6)
AST elevation	13 (26)	2 (4)
ALP elevation	5 (10)	0
CPK elevation	8 (16)	0
LDH elevation	11 (22)	0
CRP elevation	6 (12)	0
Metabolism and nutrition
Appetite decrease	12 (24)	0
Hypertriglyceridemia	5 (10)	1 (2)
Hypoalbuminemia	10 (20)	2 (4)
Hypokalemia	6 (12)	3 (6)
Hypophosphatemia	8 (16)	5 (10)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue
Arthralgia	5 (10)	0
Back pain	7 (14)	0
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecifiedb
Cancer pain	23 (45)	3 (6)
Nervous system
Dysgeusia	12 (24)	0
Headache	6 (12)	0
Peripheral neuropathy	16 (31)	0
Psychiatric
Insomnia	5 (10)	0
Renal and urinary
Proteinuria	5 (10)	0
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal
Cough	6 (12)	0
Oropharyngeal pain	5 (10)	0
Skin and subcutaneous tissue
Alopecia	14 (28)	NA
Rash	6 (12)	0

^an = 51; safety analysis set.

^bIncluding cysts and polyps.

Safety analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety evaluation. Italics indicate adverse events that occurred in at least 30% of patients treated with eribulin.ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CPK, creatinine phosphokinase; CRP, C-reactive protein; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; NA, not applicable.

Discussion

This Phase 2 study in Japanese patients with advanced/metastatic STS investigated the efficacy and safety of eribulin monotherapy. The patient population enrolled was representative of the target population of patients with previously treated advanced/metastatic STS. The data in this study indicate clinical activity of eribulin in these patients.

The primary efficacy endpoint findings were promising, with a PFR_12wks of 60% in patients with LPS/LMS; specifically, 81% in patients with LPS and 42% in patients with LMS. The PFR_12wks in patients with OTH was 31%, and 51% in the overall population. The secondary efficacy endpoints support the primary data, with median PFS and OS of 5.5 and 17.0 months, respectively, in patients with LPS/LMS. While the relatively small number of patients in this study and its nonrandomized nature may be perceived as potential limitations, these outcomes are comparable with, if not more favorable than, the previous EORTC Phase 2 study with eribulin where PFR_12wks was achieved in 47% (95% CI: 29–65%) of patients with LPS and 32% (95% CI: 18–49%) with LMS (14). We have also compared our results with those from the pivotal Phase 3 study of eribulin (NCT01327885) in 452 previously treated patients with intermediate- or high-grade advanced LPS/LMS (15). In that study, the primary endpoint of OS was met, with a 2-month difference observed in favor of eribulin compared with dacarbazine in the overall population (median OS: 13.5 vs 11.5 months; HR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.62–0.95]; P = 0.0169). In the eribulin arm, the median OS in patients with LPS was 15.6 months, compared with 12.7 months in patients with LMS. PFR_12wks in that study was 33% with eribulin and 29% with dacarbazine, while the median PFS was 2.6 months in both treatment arms (15).

The efficacy of eribulin for each STS subtype were reported as exploratory in this study. For LPS, PFR_12wks was 77.8% in patients with myxoid LPS and 83.3% in patients with dedifferentiated LPS. Although dedifferentiated LPS has shown generally poor prognosis and lower responses to chemotherapy compared with myxoid LPS (19), eribulin, interestingly, showed a high PFR_12wks for this subtype. Additionally, PFR_12wks was achieved in various subtypes in OTH (endometrial stromal sarcoma [2/2 patients], synovial sarcoma [1/3 patients], solitary fibrous tumor [1/2 patients] and fibrosarcoma [1/2 patients]). Specifically, more than 20% tumor shrinkage was shown, and PFS exceeded 6 months in synovial sarcoma. Eribulin is considered as active drug for various subtypes of STS.

Eribulin had a manageable safety profile in this study, with no new or unexpected safety findings. Neutropenia was a common AE but was short-lasting and reversible. The incidence of Grade 3–4 neutropenia was higher in this study compared with Phase 2 study (86% vs 52%) (14). Patients in our study may have been more heavily pretreated, having received up to seven (median 2) prior regimens for advanced/metastatic disease, whereas the number of prior regimens was not reported in the previous Phase 2 study (14). Alternatively, interstudy differences may be attributable to the different ethnicities of patients involved in these studies, including population-related pharmacogenomic differences (20,21). Neutropenia was managed by dose modifications and G-CSF (administered in 49% of patients overall). Grade 3–4 treatment-related febrile neutropenia occurred in 6–8% of patients in both studies. Severe nonhematological AEs were uncommon.

In conclusion, data from this Phase 2 study show clinical activity of eribulin, based on PFR_12wks, PFS and OS, with a manageable safety profile in previously treated Japanese patients with advanced/metastatic STS.

Conflict of interest statement

Yoichi Naito received honoraria and research funding from Eisai Co., Ltd.; Hideo Morioka received honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo Co., Ltd.; Kenichi Saito is an employee of Eisai Co., Ltd.; Shun Asami is an employee of Eisai Co., Ltd.; Kazuo Isu received honoraria from Eisai Co., Ltd.; Yasuo Yazawa received research funding from Eisai Co., Ltd.; Akira Kawai, Nobuhito Araki, Toshifumi Ozaki, Hideshi Sugiura, and Akihiko Matsumine, have nothing to disclose.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology online.

Funding

Eisai Co., Ltd., Japan.

ClinicalTrials.gov registration number

NCT01458249.