Abstract
Rationale:
PNETs (primitive neuroectodermal tumors) are a family of highly malignant neoplasms characterized by small round cells of neuroepithelial origin. They usually involve bone and soft tissues, and have a higher incidence in childhood.
Patient concerns:
In this case report, we describe the obstetric and oncological outcome of a huge mass diagnosed as a leiomyoma in a 39-year-old pregnant woman who complained of low back pain, dysuria, and urinary frequency at 22 weeks of gestation.
Diagnoses:
During the 25th week of pregnancy, the patient was referred to our hospital at night with severe anemia and suspected hemoperitoneum. She underwent an emergency caesarean section, delivering a female fetus weighing 400 g, with an Apgar score of 7 at 1 minute and 9 at 5 minutes.
Intervention:
During surgery, we found a huge uterine sarcoma-like metastatic tumor, invading the pelvic peritoneum and parametria bilaterally; the adnexae seemed disease-free. We performed a type B radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic peritonectomy, omentectomy, appendectomy, and excision of a bulky lymph node. Seven days after delivery, staging computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated a large lombo-aortic lymph node compressing the left renal vein and we completed debulking with a second surgery, including diaphragmatic peritonectomy and excision of a huge lymph node by lombo-aortic lymphadenectomy, requiring partial reconstruction of an infiltrated renal vein.
Outcome:
Ten days after the second surgery, echo-color Doppler showed a regular microcirculation in the left kidney. The patient was discharged after 10 days, and the baby after 1 month, both in good health.
Histological examination revealed a uterine body cPNET (central primitive neuroectodermal tumor) orienting the clinical management toward chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide.
Lessons:
PNETs are aggressive neoplasms, usually diagnosed at an advanced stage. Due to their low incidence, universally accepted guidelines are still unavailable. Radical surgery leaving no macroscopic residual disease is mandatory in advanced stages. A good fertility-sparing procedure can be performed only in young women at early stages of disease, when the wish for childbearing is not yet fulfilled.
Keywords: central primitive neuroectodermal tumor (cPNET), neoplasm, pregnancy, uterus
1. Introduction
PNETs (primitive neuroectodermal tumors) are a family of highly malignant neoplasms characterized by small round cells of neuroepithelial origin. They usually involve bone and soft tissues, and have a higher incidence in childhood. This is the second case to be diagnosed, at the advanced stage, in a pregnant uterus at emergency cesarean section, but in our case, there was a maternal indication in view of the clinical picture, not a fetal indication as in Blattner case.[1] PNETs were first described in 1973 as a group of small round cell tumors that arise from mesenchymal progenitor cells, belonging to a spectrum of neoplastic diseases known as Ewing family of tumors (EFT).[2,3] PNETs mostly affect Caucasian and Hispanic young adults and adolescents, and feature a male predominance.[4] PNETs of the genital tract are rare; they can share some genetic rearrangements such as translocations involving the EWS-FLI1 genes, as in peripheral PNET or also CIC-DUX4.[5–8] To date, 112 cases of primary uterine PNET have been reported in the literature (see Table 1 ),[9,10] including the present case; the largest series is the 17-patient case series reported by Euscher et al.[9,10]
Table 1.
PNET of the uterus: review of the literature.

Table 1 (Continued).
PNET of the uterus: review of the literature.

Table 1 (Continued).
PNET of the uterus: review of the literature.

Differential diagnosis is with desmoplastic small round cell tumors (DRSCTs), belonging to Ewing Sarcoma family of tumors, and small-cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT). SCCOHT is a very rare and aggressive malignant tumor affecting children and young women, characterized by SMARCA4 protein loss and hypercalcemia.
PNETs can be subdivided into 2 major categories: central type, composed by small round cells displayed more or less like central nervous tumors, and peripheral type or extra-osseous Ewing sarcoma, composed entirely by sheets of small round cells and sometimes rosettes.[8] Most primary uterine PNETs belong to the central type PNET, so they lack the EWSR1 gene translocation, as in our case, even if they share some morphological features with the peripheral types.[8,11] In the case series of uterine PNETs collected by Euscher et al,[9] CD99 was positive in 7 of 9 cases tested for the marker; all 12 cases were tested for the typical EWSR1 rearrangement, but yielded negative results.[1]
2. Case report
In this case report, we describe the obstetric and oncological outcome of a huge mass diagnosed as a leiomyoma, operated at 25 weeks of gestational age in a 39-year-old pregnant woman with a previous obstetric history of 1 spontaneous abortion and 1 vaginal delivery. Written informed consent was given by the patient. The project has been approved by the local Ethics Committee and conforms to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki in 1995.
The patient had never had previous surgery, and denied any previous health problems. Since the first trimester screening had evidenced a borderline risk for 21 trisomy, she underwent amniocentesis showing a normal female karyotype. However, the morphological US examination, at 22 gestational weeks, demonstrated a huge (9 cm) abdominal mass, classified as a leiomyoma; at this time, the patient started to complain of low back pain, dysuria, and urinary frequency.
During the 25th week, the patient was referred to our tertiary level hospital for severe anemia, hemoperitoneum, and persistent hypovolemia, despite the administration of 5 units of blood.
A worsening state of shock and increasing abdominal effusion with the ultrasound features of hemoperitoneum dictated an urgent caesarean section, performed by longitudinal laparotomy. After removing 400 mL of blood, we found a huge solid mass, crumbly and strictly adhering to the whole anterior surface of the uterus. LSCS (lower segment caesarean section) was not possible, so we performed a posterior vertical section (see Fig. 1) in order to achieve an “en bloc” extraction of the fetus, placenta, and amniotic sac. The neonate was alive and well, weighing 400 g, with an Apgar score of 7 after 1 minute and 9 at 5 minutes.
Figure 1.

Uterus grossly involved by neoplasia with a sagittal caesarean cut on its posterior face; ovaries were macroscopically free of disease, but we removed them in order to be radical.
The uterus was dislocated and expanded by the presence of numerous confluent scirrous nodules, distributed from the fundus up to the front face, and also involving the parametria. The adnexae seemed to be macroscopically normal, but we decided on radical salpingo-oophorectomy.
Considering the vast uterine involvement by the tumor, reaching a maximum diameter of about 35 cm, we proceeded with a type B radical hysterectomy,[84,85] associated with pelvic peritonectomy, omentectomy, and appendectomy. Manual exploration of the retroperitoneum highlighted extensive lymphadenopathy, extending from the pelvic retroperitoneum up to the renal level; the visual and palpable mean diameter of pelvic lymph nodes was 5 to 6 cm.
Perioperatively, we transfused 6 units of plasma and 5 units of red blood cells.
In view of the severe anemia and the emergency nature of the caesarean section, we postponed a nodal debulking until after appropriate instrumental staging and histological diagnosis. Oncological serum markers were investigated in the early postpartum period, showing slight positivity of CA 125 [166.5 U/mL (normal value, n.v., 0.0–30.0 U/mL)] and AFP [21.6 ng/ml (n.v. 0.0–8.0 ng/mL)]. The patient also showed a mild reduction of renal function [serum creatinine 1.33 mg/dL (n.v. 0.51–0.95 mg/dL); eGFR 50 mL/min (n.v. >90 mL/min) and severe hypoalbuminemia [1.7 g/dL (n.v. 3.4–5.0 g/dL)].
The serum calcium level after the first surgery was 8.2 mg/ dL [n.v. 8.5–10.1 mg/dL] with albumin 1.8 g/dL [n.v. 3.4–5.0 g/dL], versus 7.9 mg/dL with serum albumin 2.7 g/dL at discharge.
CT scan, performed 1 week after caesarean section, demonstrated multiple bulky lymph nodes in the hypogastric-obturatory, peri-aortic, intercavo-aortic regions, the largest measuring 6 x 5 cm in high retrocaval position, causing caval compression and anterior dislocation of the left vein (see Fig. 2).
Figure 2.

CT scan of the abdomen demonstrated many bulky lymph nodes, the largest measuring 6 x 5 cm in high retrocaval position. This one caused a caval compression and an anterior dislocation of the left vein with a focal thrombosis from kidney level until the right common iliac vein.
Bulky nodes also distorted both common iliac vessels and the ureters, causing bilateral hydro-nephrosis. There were moderate ascites, as well as focal and partial thrombosis of the inferior vena cava under the renal vein and right iliac vessel, each extending for about 2 cm. The peritoneum was thickened both against the abdominal wall and on the visceral side, up to the diaphragm.
Two weeks after the first surgery, we completed debulking with a second surgery including diaphragmatic peritonectomy and excision of a huge lymph node by lombo-aortic lymphadenectomy (see Fig. 3).
Figure 3.

From the right side: a huge retrocaval bulky lymph node under the renal vein level, then inferior vena cava and aorta, both isolated from other bulky lymph nodes.
We dissected a large lymph node infiltrating the left renal vein, by interruption and reconstruction of the vein. The left renal vein lesion was linear and without loss of substance, so it was possible to repair it by prolene running whipstitches, after upstream and downstream clamping with vascular loops.
During the second surgery, 9 units of red blood cells and 2 units of plasma were transfused; the great quantity of transfusions was justified by the peculiar anatomic dislocation of the enlarged lymph-nodes. After the second surgery, the renal function was completely restored (serum creatinine 0.78 mg/dL and eGFR 96 ml/min). The patient was discharged after 10 days, while the neonate remained in the neonatal intensive unit for 1 month. They were both discharged in good health.
Ten days after the second surgery, echo-color Doppler showed normal microcirculation resistance indices in the left kidney and a normal patency of the reconstructed left renal vein.
Histological examination revealed a uterine body PNET (peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor) with diffuse lymph invasion of the vascular space, involving the uterus, omentum, and epiploic nodules, posterior parametrium, peri-adnexal tissues, but not the ovaries and tubes. The tumoral cells were undifferentiated, round, small, and monomorphic with a tendency to form nests.
The results of immunohistochemistry are summarized in Table 2 and Fig. 4.
Table 1 (Continued).
PNET of the uterus: review of the literature.

Figure 4.

PNET, pathological characteristics: (A,B) Histologic examination showed undifferentiated neoplasms composed of diffuse sheets, nests, and cords of noncohesive monomorphic small blue/basaloid cells (H-E: 100x, 200x). The neoplastic cells showed mild and focal immunoreactivity for (C) WT1 and (D) CD99.
Table 2.
Immunohistochemistry results.

The histological findings after the second surgery confirmed the diagnosis of metastasis of a uterine body PNET (primitive neuroectodermal tumor) to the paracaval lymph node, ovarian veins bilaterally, obturatory lymph nodes bilaterally, sigmoid and ascendant epiploon, paracolic peritoneum, diaphragm nodule, caecum peritoneal node, Morrison peritoneum, hepatic hilum parenchymal node, and vaginal cuff.
Because the restaging CT after the second surgery showed mild ascites and a small pulmonary nodule at the right lung apex, measuring less than 5 mm, with mesenteric-infra-mesocolic lymph nodes of borderline radiological significance, a histological re-evaluation was performed.
The new immunohistochemistry is also summarized in Table 2; FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) study demonstrated negativity for EWS (Ewing sarcoma), a 22q12 translocation, WT1, and CIC rearrangement (with BAC Bacteria Artificial Chromosome probe library RP11).
Clinical management was therefore adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 6 courses as follows: Cisplatin 25/m2 days 1–3 + Etoposide 100 mg/mg days 1–3 q 21. The ascites disappeared after 3 courses of chemotherapy and Ca125 reached a negative value, 19.46 U/mL after the fourth course.
The patient has completed therapy, and at 2 year's follow-up, she is in good general health with a good performance status (ECOG PS 0), and her daughter is also well.
3. Discussion
Primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) belong to a group of small round cell tumors that are most commonly found in the central nervous system, soft tissues, or bones (Kim et al).[5] They are rare in the female genital tract; the ovary is their preferred site (Odunsi et al).[35] There were less than 50 cases of PNET of the uterus reported in the English literature,[6,12] before the present case report. Pregnancy should not delay diagnosis of this potentially aggressive tumor. This case is only the second to be reported with onset in the uterine body during pregnancy.[1]
Risk factors for uterine PNET have a bimodal distribution, during adolescence or in postmenopausal age. A uterine localization usually presents with abnormal uterine bleeding if there is endometrial involvement; in any case, uterine PNETs are characterized by an aggressive behavior (Park et al).[20] Ca125 may play a role as an important marker for the prognosis and follow-up of PNET of the female internal genital tract.[14]
The present case is the only one in literature to be diagnosed during the second trimester of pregnancy, mimicking a large uterine fibroma with an acute clinical onset due to sudden severe anemia and hemoperitoneum.
The devastating disease spread in an otherwise normally evolving pregnancy and required an unusual access to the uterine cavity to deliver the fetus from a grossly altered, bleeding uterus, and 2-step surgery in order to complete the debulking, as well as demanding reconstruction of an infiltrated left renal vein.
Our case is also a rare example of caesarean section through the posterior uterine wall; this has previously been described in literature in 3 cases of torsion of a pregnant uterus due to a large myoma[15–17] and one of a severe placenta percreta precluding ordinary LSCS.[18]
During the 2-year postsurgical follow-up, we were pleased to observe the normal clinical health status of the patient, and of a healthy baby girl, who is developing well.
The histological diagnosis was very challenging, strongly influencing the therapeutic choice. PNETs are characterized by small, uniform round malignant cells with rounded vesicular nuclei bearing small nucleoli; the surrounding cytoplasm is scanty and ill defined; the N/C ratio is increased, with a high mitotic activity. Central PNETs show sheets of poorly differentiated small blue cells with an architecture that mimics tumors of the CNS: neuropil islands, ependymal rosettes, vascular pseudo rosettes, pseudostratified neuroepithelium with tubular spaces, and multi-layered tubular rosettes and neuroblastic rosettes. Peripheral PNET or extraosseous Ewing sarcoma is composed entirely by sheets of small round cells and sometimes rosettes without a CNS-like architecture.[8] Immunochemistry can also show diffuse membranous CD99, a highly specific marker, but also vimentin, intranuclear FLi-1, and sometimes keratin cocktails (CAM 5.2; AE1/AE3).[8,19,20]
In our case, the tumoral cells were undifferentiated, round, small, and monomorphic with a tendency to form nets; immunohistochemistry showed focal CD 99 and WT1 expression, but was negative for vimentin (see Fig. 4).
FISH or PCR evaluation could add information to the diagnosis. In fact, peripheral PNETs harbor chromosomal translocations that codify for chimeric transcripts, usually involving EWSR1 (22q12) with a spectrum of other Ewing sarcoma transcription factors. EWSR1 can often form a chimeric couple with FLI 1 (11q24) (85%) or ERG (21q22) (5–10%). EWSR1 may also match with ETV1, E1AF, or FEV; in other cases, there is no translocation involving EWSR1, such as CIC-DUX4 or BCOR –CCNB3.[4,7,20–22]
However, the distinction between peripheral and central PNETs is not easy because the morphological and immunophenotype characteristics commonly overlap. In the literature, however, only in few cases, the presence or absence of EWSR1 translocations has been specified.
Moreover, PNET tumors require differential diagnosis with other comparable conditions.[8] Desmoplastic small round cell tumors (DRSCTs), such as pPNETs, belong to the ESTs family: DRSCT could mimic PNET. DRSCT are aggressive neoplasms that predominantly occur intra-abdominally in young people, mostly males, and are characterized by a recurrent translocation EWSR1-WT1 t (11; 22) (p13; q12).[22,23]
Another condition that could mimic DRSCT or PNETs is small-cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT), identified by Dickersin et al in 1982 as a unique entity.[24] In 82% of SCCOHTs, there is SMARCA4 protein loss (BRG1gene), which is extremely rare in all other primary ovarian tumors, just 0.4%. On the basis of morphologic and molecular affinities between SCCOHT and atypical teratoid/malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRTs), some authors have proposed a new name: MRT of the ovary. MRTs arise more frequently during childhood in the kidney. Rarely they can be seen in adults and extra-kidney sites, such as the female genital tract. Most MRTs, including tumors arising in the brain, called atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors [AT/RTs], host inactivating mutations in SMARCB1 (INI-1; SNF5; BAF47).[25,26] Other MRTs of the ovaries, without the SMARCB1 alteration, harbor a similar mutation involving the SMARCA4 gene (also called BRG1) as also occurs in SCCOHT, so both can be denominated MRTOs.[26–32] In the 150 cases of SCCOHT described by Young et al in 1994,[33] hypercalcemia was found in 49 of the 79 patients (62%) with documented preoperative calcium levels; similar data were confirmed in the review by Callegaro-Filho et al.[34] In literature, SCCOHT at surgery was unilateral in 148 cases (99%), and extraovarian spread was present in about 50% of cases. SCCOHT was found during routine examinations in pregnancy in 2 cases during caesarean section and in 2 other cases during clinical evaluation in puerperium. When preoperative and postoperative serum calcium levels were tested, their values returned to normal after removal of the tumor while, in many cases, the calcium level rose once more at the time of the recurrence.[33] Moreover, SCCOHT usually spreads inside the pelvis and abdomen as an ovarian cancer. Involvement of abdominal and pelvic lymph nodes or even the presence of parenchymal liver metastases have also often been observed. Rarely, distant metastases are observed, spreading to the lungs, brain, and bones.[33]
According to Young et al,[33] SCCOHT has an epithelial origin based on immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and electron microscopy findings of an abundantly dilated rough endoplasmic reticulum. SCCOHT can also show a morphological signature, unlike other small cell carcinomas, consisting in a predominance of large cells with an abundant cytoplasm.[33] However, in our case, the serum calcium value was always borderline, at the lower extreme of the normal range and the ovaries were both free of disease at pathological examination excluding SCCOHT, and MRTO in general, from a clinical point of view.
Finally, a genital tract that has the morphological and immunophenotypic characteristics of a neuroectodermal tumor, in the absence of EWSR1-associated translocations, could be considered as a central PNET, as in our case (see Table 3).
Table 1 (Continued).
PNET of the uterus: review of the literature.

Table 3.
Fish results.

In the Table 1 , we have reviewed 111 cases of PNET of the uterus, including ours, which brings the total to 112 cases. The average age of onset is 45.64 years, the median being 49.5 years. The mean pre-treatment Ca 125 value is 199.14 U/mL, suggesting therefore only a peritoneal surface irritation and not an actual peritoneal neoplasia. The most common clinical presentation is vaginal bleeding (66.33%) and, showing similar rates, the presence of a pelvic mass (22.77%) and of abdominal pain (21.78%). There was a concomitant pregnancy only in 4 of the 101 cases. Pregnancy interruption was the precipitating cause in w of these, while in a third case (Blattner et al[1]), PNET was found incidentally at the operating table during a C-section at term for a fetal indication, suggesting a small but invasive tumor. In our case, emergency laparotomy and caesarian section were performed in a pregnant woman at 25-weeks’ gestation, and extensive 2-step debulking surgery, due to huge hemoperitoneum, abdominal pain, and a large pelvic mass. Our follow-up has lasted 24 months so far; the mean follow-up in the literature is 26.53 months. Among the 112 reported cases, including ours, there were 23 deaths with a mean interval before DOD, death of disease, of 12.7 months from diagnosis, and a median DOD of 9.5 months. The presentation stage, when reported or deducible from the information provided by the authors (94/112), was above all advanced (≥ III stage). We found 43 cases reported at stage III, including ours belonging to stage IIIC; 15 cases at stage IV and 36 at stages I-II, 18 cases at unknown stages. In 61.70% of cases, the presentation reaches advanced stages (III-IV stage), while in 38.29% cases, the presentation stops at the first stages (stage I-II). From the above data, the aggressiveness of the biological behavior of the uterine PNETs is very clear.
Treatment for PNETs can be surgery, radical, or conservative with or without lymphadenectomy because the role of radiation is unclear,[6] or chemotherapy alone or else a multimodal approach. At 2 years, survival of young people is 75%, versus 32% in the postmenopausal age group.[35]
Thanks to chemotherapy, the prognosis of Ewing sarcoma family of tumors reaches a 60% survival rate at 5 years: in more than 80% of cases, ESFTs are chemosensitive, with a good prognosis. Intensive chemotherapy schedules include alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide or ifosfamide), vincristine, actinomycin- D, and frequently doxorubicin.[36,37]
Recent studies suggest that doxorubicin, etoposide, and ifosfamide should be added to the standard cyclophosphamide-vincristine-actinomycin regimen.[38] More recently, in the literature, platinum-based chemotherapies have been reported to have similar survival rates compared with the much more toxic regimens commonly used for PNET. Case reports showed long disease-free intervals after treatment with platinum and etoposide therapy alone.[39,40] As there is no standard chemotherapy for PNET, the combination of carboplatin or cisplatin with etoposide can be considered a viable option. In the future, we may use monoclonal antibodies against a potential target, such as IGF-1, involved in PNET growth.[41] Other possible targets could be phospholipase D2 (PLD2) and protein tyrosine phosphatase I (PTPL1), both highly expressed in pPNET.[42,43]
4. Conclusion
PNETs are aggressive neoplasms, usually diagnosed at an advanced stage. Due to their low incidence, universally accepted guidelines are still unavailable. Nevertheless, they are not only known to be chemoresponsive but also characterized by local and metastatic growth. Radical surgery leaving no macroscopic residual disease is mandatory in advanced stages. A good fertility-sparing procedure can be performed only in young women at early stages of disease, when the wish for childbearing is not yet fulfilled.
It will become increasingly important to identify central PNETs and among them to subdifferentiate variants such as medulloblastoma, ependymoma, astrocytoma, glioblastoma, in order to select those patients who may benefit from commonly used therapies for CNS tumors.
Tailored combined chemotherapy could well be the best choice for the patient, as in our experience. On the basis of the biological pattern, it may be possible to design targeted therapy, improving survival and quality of life.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: DSRCT = Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumours, EFT = Ewing's family of tumours, FISH = Fluorescence in situ hybridisation, PNETs = primitive neuroectodermal tumours, SCCOHT = small-cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcaemic type.
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
- [1].Blattner JM, Gable P, Quigley MM, McHale MT. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus. Gynecol Oncol 2007;106:419–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Hart NH, Earle KM. Primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the brain in children”. Cancer 1973;32:890–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Jedlicka P. Ewing sarcoma, an enigmatic malignancy of likely progenitor cell origin, driven by transcription factor oncogenic fusions”. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2010;3:338–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Ng TL, O'Sullivan MJ, Pallen CJ, et al. Ewing sarcoma with novel translocation t(2;16) producing an in-frame fusion of FUS and FEV. J Mol Diagn 2007;9:459–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Kim KJ, Jang BW, Lee SK, et al. A case of peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the ovary. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2004;14:370–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Loverro G, Resta L, Di Naro E. Conservative treatment of Ewing's sarcoma of the uterus in young women. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2015;2015: Article ID 871821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Haidar A, Arekapudi S, DeMattia F, et al. High-grade undifferentiated small round cell sarcoma with t(4;19)(q35;q13.1) CIC-DUX4 fusion: emerging entities of soft tissue tumors with unique histopathologic features – a case report and literature review. Am J Case Rep 2015;16:87–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Chiang S, Snuderl M, Kojiro-Sanada S, et al. Primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the female genital tract: a morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular study of 19 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2017;41:761–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Euscher ED, Deavers MT, Lopez-Terrada D, et al. Uterine tumors with neuroectodermal differentiation: a series of 17 cases and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32:219–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Elizalde CR, Yagüe A, Fernandez J, et al. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2016;18:25–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Varghese L, Arnesen M, Boente M. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus: a case report and review of literature. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2006;25:373–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Bhardwaj M, Batrani M, Chawla I, Malik R. “Uterine primitive neuroectodermal tumor with adenosarcoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2010;4:195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Tsao AS, Roth LM, Sandler A, et al. Cervical primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Gynecol Oncol 2001;83:138–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Xiao C, Zhao J, Guo P, et al. Clinical analysis of primary primitive neuroectodermal tumors in the female genital tract. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014;24:404–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Bolaji II, Rafla NM, Mylotte MJ. Classical caesarean section through the posterior uterine wall. Ir J Med Sci 1992;161:46–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Ahmed FU, Ambreen A, Zubair S, et al. Torsion of a term uterus. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2016;26(6 Suppl):S50–1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Sparic R, Lazovic B. Inevitable cesarean myomectomy following delivery through posterior hysterotomy in a case of uterine torsion. Med Arch 2013;67:75–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Gruca-Stryjak K, Ropacka-Lesiak M, Bręborowicz GH. Placenta percreta: a severe obstetric complication despite correct diagnosis: a case report. Pol 2015;86:951–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Goda J, Nirah B, Mayur K, et al. Primitive neuroectodermal tumour of the cervix: a rare entity. Internet J Radiol 2006;6:1–5. [Google Scholar]
- [20].Park JY, Lee S, Kang HJ, et al. Primary Ewing's sarcoma-primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus: a case report and literature review. Gynecol Oncol 2007;106:427–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Machado I, Navarro S, Llombart-Bosch A. Ewing sarcoma and the new emerging Ewing-like sarcomas: (CIC and BCOR-rearranged-sarcomas). A systematic review. Histol Histopathol 2016;31:1169–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Nakayama J, Nassau S, Atkins K, Modesitt SC. Desmoplastic small round cell tumor of the ovary: a rare but devastating disease in young women. Gynecol Oncol Case Rep 2014;7:16–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Thway K, Noujaim J, Zaidi S, et al. Desmoplastic small round cell tumor: pathology, genetics and therapeutic strategies. Int J Surg Pathol 2016;24:672–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Dickersin GR, Kline IW, Scully RE. Small cell carcinoma of the ovary with hypercalcemia: a report of 11 cases. Cancer 1982;49:188–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Darr J, Klochendler A, Isaac S, et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis reveals Smarcb1 dependent EGFR signaling in malignant rhabdoid tumor cells. Mol Cancer 2015;14:167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Biegel JA, Busse TM, Weissman BE. SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes and cancer. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2014;166C:350–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Ramos P, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type, displays frequent inactivating germline and somatic mutations in SMARCA4. Nat Genet 2014;46:427–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Witkowski L, Carrot-Zhang J, Albrecht S, et al. Germline and somatic SMARCA4 mutations characterize small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. Nat Genet 2014;46:438–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Jelinic P, Mueller JJ, Olvera N, et al. Recurrent SMARCA4 mutations in small cell carcinoma of the ovary”. Nat Genet 2014;46:424–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Foulkes WD, Clarke BA, Hasselblatt M, et al. No small surprise: small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcaemic type, is a malignant rhabdoid tumour. J Pathol 2014;233:209–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Rabinovich A, Witkowski L, Shaco-Levi R, et al. Primary rhabdoid tumor of the ovary: when large cells become small cells. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2015;12:64–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Clarke BA, Witkowski L, Ton Nu TN, et al. Loss of SMARCA4 (BRG1) protein expression as determined by immunohistochemistry in small-cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcaemic type distinguishes these tumours from their mimics”. Histopathology 2016;69:727–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Young RH, Oliva E, Scully RE. Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. A clinicopathological analysis of 150 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1994;18:1102–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Callegaro-Filho D, Gershenson DM, Nick AM, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the ovary-hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT): a review of 47 cases. Gynecol Oncol 2016;140:53–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Odunsi K, Olatinwo M, Collins Y, et al. Primary primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 2004;92:689–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Sholler GL, Luks F, Mangray S, et al. Advanced small cell carcinoma of the ovary in a pediatric patient with long-term survival and review of the literature. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2005;27:169–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Bakhru A, Liu JR, Lagstein A. A case of small cell carcinoma of the ovary hypercalcemic variant in a teenager. Gynecol Oncol Case Rep 2012;2:139–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Grier HE, Krailo MD, Tarbell NJ, et al. Addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to standard chemotherapy for Ewing's sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumour of bone. N Engl J Med 2003;348:694–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Dizon AM, Kilgore LC, Grindstaff A, et al. High grade primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus: a case report. Gynecol Oncol Case Rep 2014;7:10–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Tsai HJ, et al. Uterine tumor with neuroectodermal differentiation of advanced stage managed successfully with multimodal strategy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;162:235–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Ludwig JA. Ewing sarcoma: historical perspectives, current state-of-the-art, and opportunities for targeted therapy in the future. Curr Opin Oncol 2008;20:412–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Nozawa S, Ohno T, Banno Y, et al. Inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor-induced cell growth signaling by a short interfering RNA for EWS-Fli1 via down-regulation of phospholipase D2 in Ewing sarcoma cells. J Biol Chem 2005;280:27544–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Abaan OD, Levenson A, Khan O, et al. PTPL1 is a direct transcriptional target of EWS-FLI1 and modulates Ewing's sarcoma tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2005;24:2715–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Novo J, Bitterman P, Guirguis A. Central-type primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus: case report of remission of stage IV disease using adjuvant cisplatin/etoposide/bevacizumab chemotherapy and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2015;14:26–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Dundr P, Fischerová D, Povýšil C, et al. Uterine tumors with neuroectodermal differentiation: a report of 4 cases. Pathol Oncol Res 2010;16:601–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Daya D, Lukka H, Clement PB. Primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the uterus: a report of four cases. Hum Pathol 1992;23:1120–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Khosla D, Rai B, Patel FD, et al. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterine cervix diagnosed during pregnancy: a rare case with review of literature. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;40:878–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Venizelos ID, Zafrakas M, Dragoumis K, et al. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) of the uterine isthmus. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2003;25:384–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Aminimoghaddam S, Seifirad S, Abbasi Dezfouli G, et al. Uterine primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Arch Iran Med 2015;18: [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Masoura S, et al. Primary primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the cervix confirmed with molecular analysis in a 23-year-old woman: a case report. Pathol Res Pract 2012;208:245–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Bartosch C, et al. Endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma associated with primitive neuroectodermal tumour of the uterus: a poor prognostic subtype of uterine tumours. Med Oncol 2011;28:1488–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Celik H, Gurates B, Karaoğlu A, et al. Uterine primitive neuroectodermal tumor: a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;279:259–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Bhardwaj M, Batrani M, Chawla I, Malik R. Uterine primitive neuroectodermal tumor with adenosarcoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2010;4:195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Sato S, et al. Peripheral neuroepithelioma (peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor) of the uterine cervix. Tohoku J Exp Med 1996;180:187–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Karseladze AI, Filipova NA, Navarro S, Llombart-Bosch A. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus. A case report. J Reprod Med 2001;46:845–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Hendrickson MR, Scheithauer BW. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the endometrium: report of two cases, one with electron microscopic observations. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1985;5:249–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Ward BS, Hitchcock CL, Keyhani S. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus. Acta Cytol 2000;44:667–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Rose PG, O’Toole RV, Keyhani-Rofagha S, et al. Malignant peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus. J Surg Oncol 1987;35:165–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Molyneux AJ, Deen S, Sundaresan V. Primitive neuroectodermal tumour of the uterus. Histopathology 1992;21:584–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Fraggetta F, Magro G, Vasquez E. Primitive neuroectodermal tumour of the uterus with focal cartilaginous differentiation. Histopathology 1997;30:483–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Sørensen JB, Schultze HR, Madsen EL, et al. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) of the uterine cavity. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998;76:181–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Taïeb S, et al. MRI of primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:896–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Mittal S, Sumana G, Gupta M, Gupta B. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus: a case report. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007;17:524–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Akbayır Ö, Gungorduk K, Rafioglu G, et al. Primary primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus: a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008;277:345–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Peres E, Mattoo TK, Poulik J, Warrier I. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) of the uterus in a renal allograft patient: a case report. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2005;44:283–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Mashriqi N, Gujjarlapudi JK, Sidhu J, et al. Ewing's sarcoma of the cervix, a diagnostic dilemma: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep 2015;9:255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Shah JP, et al. Carboplatin and paclitaxel adjuvant chemotherapy in primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterine corpus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:e6–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Majeed U, Ilyas MA, Uddin N, et al. Primary Ewing's sarcoma: primitive neuroectodermal tumour of uterus. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;29:73–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Ren YL, Tang F, Li T. Ewing sarcoma-primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the uterus: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of one case. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;283:1139–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Fukunaga M, Nomura K, Endo Y, et al. Carcinosarcoma of the uterus with extensive neuroectodermal differentiation. Histopathology 1996;29:565–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Stolnicu S, et al. Embryonal (botryoides) rhabdomyosarcoma of the uterus harboring a primitive neuroectodermal tumor component. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2012;31:387–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Russin VL, Valente PT, Hanjani P. Psammoma bodies in neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol 1987;31:791–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Horn LC, Fischer U, Bilek K. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the cervix uteri. A case report. Gen Diagn Pathol 1997;142:227–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Cenacchi G, Pasquinelli G, Montanaro L, et al. Primary endocervical extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma/PNET. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1998;17:83–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Pauwels P, Ambros P, Hattinger C, et al. Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour of the cervix. Virchows Archiv 2000;436:68–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Malpica A, Moran CA. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the cervix: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of two cases. Ann Diagn Pathol 2002;6:281–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Snijders-Keilholz A, Ewing P, Seynaeve C, Burger CW. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the cervix uteri: a case report: changing concepts in therapy. Gynecol Oncol 2005;98:516–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Farzaneh F, Rezvani H, Boroujeni PT, Rahimi F. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the cervix: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2011;5:489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Benbrahim Z, et al. Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the cervix uteri: a case report and review of literature. Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res 2015;6:30–2. [Google Scholar]
- [80].Arora N, Kalra A, Kausar H, et al. Primitive neuroectodermal tumour of uterine cervix: a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. J Obstet Gynaecol 2012;32:711–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Li B, Ouyang L, Han X, et al. Primary primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the cervix. Onco Targets Ther 2013;6:707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Eskiyörük İ, Küçükgöz Güleç Ü, Paydaş S, et al. “Primitive uterine neuroectodermal tumours: two case reports. Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2015;12:185–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Gersel DJ, Duncan DA, Fulling KH. Malignant mixed Müllerian tumor of the uterus with neuroectodermal differentiation. In J Gynecol Pathol 1989;8:169–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:297–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Benedetti-Panici P, et al. New classification system of radical hysterectomy: emphasis on a three-dimensional anatomic template for parametrial resection. Gynecol Oncol 2011;122:264–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
