Effects of Perianal Involvement on Clinical Outcomes in Crohn’s Disease over 10 Years

Abstract

Background/Aims

There was the assumption that Crohn’s disease (CD) patients with perianal lesions might have different clinical courses compared to those without. However, quantifiable data comparing the long-term outcomes between the two groups are scarce.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 221 consecutive patients newly diagnosed with CD and registered at the IBD clinic of Severance Hospital, in Seoul, Korea, between January 1990 and October 2005. We compared patients with perianal CD (PCD) and non-perianal CD (NPCD) in terms of clinical outcomes over 10 years.

Results

PCD progressed more frequently from inflammatory to complicated behavior than NPCD. Moreover, corticosteroids were prescribed in 102 patients with PCD and only 57 with NPCD (82.9% vs 58.2%, p<0.001), immunosuppressants in 89 and 42 (72.4% vs 42.9%, p<0.001), and anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) in 37 and 12 (30.1% vs 12.2%, p=0.002). Cumulative hospitalization rates were 82.1% in PCD and 72.4% in NPCD (p=0.086), and surgical intervention rates were 39.8% and 51.0%, respectively (p=0.097).

Conclusions

Patients with PCD were more likely than those with NPCD to be administered corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and anti-TNF-α. However, there is no significant difference in the cumulative rates of surgical interventions or hospitalizations.

INTRODUCTION

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a multifactorial chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that presents with unpredictable and various clinical courses. The phenotypic heterogeneity of CD makes establishing a practically useful categorization difficult, which has led to diverse classification systems.¹ In 2000, the Vienna classification system was introduced, and it has been widely used because of its simple framework that divides CD into subgroups according to age at diagnosis, disease location, and disease behavior, including inflammatory (B1), structuring (B2), and penetrating (B3) types.² Earlier studies using the Vienna classification system found that disease behavior changes significantly over time.^3,4 They also demonstrated that perianal fistulae occur independently of intestinal fistula in the penetrating type.⁵ Thus, in 2005, the Vienna classification was revised to the Montreal classification,⁶ which removed perianal disease from the penetrating type and allowed it to be added to any behavior to indicate simultaneous perianal lesions. However, it has been demonstrated that CD patients with perianal lesions might have different clinical courses and requirements for surgical or medical treatment than those without perianal lesions.^7–9 Moreover, specific genetic factors related to perianal CD (PCD) have been investigated.^10–12

PCD can involve a variety of perianal lesions during the clinical course, ranging from asymptomatic and mild problems requiring only conservative treatment to severe situations that necessitate urgent surgical interventions, such as complex fistula combined with abscess.¹³ It has also been reported that PCD itself has a more aggressive disease course that requires a more intensive treatment modality than non-perianal CD (NPCD).^14,15

Unfortunately, quantifiable data comparing the long-term outcomes of PCD and NPCD are scarce, although accurately understanding the distinction in clinical courses between them is critical in determining treatment modalities and accurately predicting clinical outcomes. Most research has dealt with PCD only as a predictive factor of clinical course.^{7,9,10,16–19} Accordingly, our aim in this study was to identify the measurable differences in long-term (more than 10 years) clinical outcomes between CD patients with and without perianal lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Study population

We retrospectively reviewed 236 consecutive patients newly diagnosed with CD and registered at the IBD clinic of Severance Hospital, a tertiary center in Seoul, South Korea, between January 1990 and October 2005. Patients were excluded from our analysis if they were followed up for less than 5 years at our hospital (n=13), were diagnosed simultaneously with another autoimmune disease (n=1), or visited our clinic while receiving treatment from another hospital (n=1). An established diagnosis of CD was based on a combination of conventional clinical, radiologic, endoscopic, and histopathologic findings.²⁰ After confirming the diagnosis of CD, we evaluated the disease status of all patients at an outpatient clinic every 1 to 3 months. At each evaluation, we monitored the patient’s clinical symptoms and signs by both interview and questionnaire and also measured their complete blood cell counts and chemistry profiles. Colonoscopies or radiologic imaging studies such as computed tomography were performed at the physician’s discretion. In cases of complications such as perforation, bleeding, infection, or severely active disease flare-ups, patients were admitted and treated accordingly. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Severance Hospital (IRB number: 4-2012-0302).

2. Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the baseline demographic data (age at diagnosis, gender, and familial history of IBD) and medical data (disease location and behavior, extraintestinal symptoms, and previous history of appendectomy). In this study, perianal lesions were classified according to the American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement.²¹ In our study, anal fistula, abscess, fissure, and stenosis (except for hemorrhoids and skin tags) were considered perianal lesions related to CD. First, we evaluated the characteristics and cumulative occurrence rate of perianal lesions. To investigate differences in clinical outcomes between PCD and NPCD patients, we evaluated three categories: medical treatments (corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, such as azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine, and anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) agents, such as infliximab or adalimumab); surgical treatments (except for operations associated with perianal lesions); and hospitalization.

We followed the Montreal classification in determining the location (L1, small bowel; L2, colon; L3, small bowel and colon; and L4, upper gastrointestinal tract) and behavior (B1, inflammatory; B2, stenosis; B3, penetrating).²² The general treatment policy for CD in our center is based on a step-up approach.²³ If CD patients are unresponsive to prior agents, we use higher step therapies as additions or replacements.

3. Statistics

Continuous variables are presented as the mean±standard deviation or median (range) and compared using two-sample t-tests. Categorical variables were compared by chi-square tests or Fisher exact tests. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate the curve, and a log-rank comparison was performed to compare the cumulative probabilities that PCD and NPCD patients would receive specific medical treatments (corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and anti-TNF-α agents) and surgical treatments. p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software package SPSS version 12.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

1. Characteristics and clinical course of disease

We included 221 CD patients in the study. Of these, 123 patients (55.7%) eventually developed perianal lesions. PCD was identified in 82 patients (37.1%) at the time of diagnosis and in 41 patients (18.6%) thereafter. The perianal lesions included 103 (83.7%) patients with fistula, 47 (38.2%) with abscess, 25 (20.3%) with fissure, and 16 (13.0%) with stenosis. Eleven cases had only fissure, six cases had only stenosis, and one case had all four types of perianal lesions. The cumulative occurrence rates of perianal lesion were 37.2% at diagnosis, 38.9% after 1 year, 43% after 3 years, 45.2% after 5 years, and 53.0% after 10 years (Fig. 1). Of 221 CD patients, 37.2% (82/221) had perianal lesion at diagnosis. In other words, among 123 PCD patients, approximately two-thirds of patients (82/123) presented initially perianal lesions. The baseline characteristics of PCD and NPCD patients are compared in Table 1. The mean age at diagnosis was significantly younger in PCD than in NPCD (23.4±7.8 vs 30.3±13.5, p<0.001), but there was no significant difference in gender (male, 63.4% vs 56.1%, p=0.271), mean duration of follow-up (130.1±42.2 months vs 132.7±49.7 months, p=0.673), extraintestinal symptoms (26.0% vs 16.3%, p=0.083), or family history of IBD (9.8% vs 4.1%, p=0.106). At the time of diagnosis, 26 PCD patients (21.1%) had disease located in L1, 25 (20.3%) in L2, 70 (56.9%) in L3, and two (1.6%) in L4, whereas 32 NPCD patients (32.7%) had disease located in L1, 26 (26.5%) in L2, 40 (40.8%) in L3, and none in L4. Disease behavior in PCD at diagnosis was inflammatory (B1) type in 70 patients (56.9%), structuring (B2) in 31 patients (25.2%), and penetrating (B3) in 22 patients (17.9%). Fifty-eight (59.2%) of the NPCD patients were diagnosed with B1 type behavior, 21 (21.4%) with B2, and 19 (19.4%) with B3. Fig. 2 shows the trends of change in behavior distribution during the course of PCD and NPCD. Twenty years after diagnosis, PCD exhibited type B1 behavior in 26.8% of cases, B2 in 15.4%, and B3 in 57.5%, whereas the NPCD behaviors were show in 39.8%, 16.3%, and 43.9%, respectively.

Fig. 1.

Cumulative rate of perianal lesions in patients with Crohn’s disease.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics (n=221)

Characteristic	Patients with perianal lesions (n=123)	Patients without perianal lesions (n=98)	p-value
Sex, male/female	78 (63.4)/ 45 (36.6)	55 (56.1)/ 43 (43.9)	0.271
Age, yr	23.4±7.8	30.3±13.5	<0.001
Follow-up period, mo	120 (60–246), 130.1±42.2	121 (61–268), 132.7±49.7	0.673
Last status			0.540
Ongoing follow-up	97 (78.9)	71 (72.4)
Loss of follow-up	24 (19.5)	25 (25.5)
Death	2 (1.6)	2 (2.0)
Extraintestinal symptoms			0.083
With	32 (26.0)	16 (16.3)
Without	91 (74.0)	82 (83.7)
Family history			0.106
Yes	12 (9.8)	4 (4.1)
No	111 (90.2)	94 (95.9)
Previous appendectomy			0.096
Yes	16 (13.0)	21 (21.4)
No	107 (87.0)	77 (78.6)

Data are presented as number (%), mean±SD, or median (range).

Fig. 2.

Tendency of behavior distribution over time between (A) perianal Crohn’s disease (CD) and (B) non-perianal CD.

2. Comparisons of treatment course

Table 2 shows the comparison of overall medication prescriptions for PCD and NPCD. Systemic corticosteroids were prescribed for 102 PCD patients (82.9%) and 57 NPCD patients (58.2%) at diagnosis or during the follow-up period. The cumulative probabilities of steroid administration were 41.5% after 1 year, 55.3% after 3 years, 70.7% after 5 years, 82.1% after 10 years, and 82.9% after 15 years among PCD patients and 29.6%, 38.8%, 45.9%, 55.1%, and 58.2%, respectively, among NPCD patients (Fig. 3). Details of the clinical outcomes regarding corticosteroid use are given in Table 2. The mean frequency of disease flare-up events requiring steroid administration was 3.3±2.3 in PCD patients and 2.4±1.9 in NPCD (p=0.015). The mean total duration of steroid administration was 372.2±577.2 days in PCD and 226.7±205.8 days in NPCD (p=0.068), and the mean days of steroid administration per event of disease flare-up was 108.4±114.5 and 94.6±45.5 days, respectively (p=0.383).

Table 2.

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes with Medication Use

Details of outcomes	Patients with perianal lesions (n=123)	Patients without perianal lesions (n=98)	p-value
Steroid use	102 (82.9)	57 (58.2)	<0.001
No. of flare-up events requiring steroid administration	3.3±2.3	2.4±1.9	0.015
Total duration of steroid administration, day	372.2±577.2	226.7±205.8	0.068
Days of steroid administration per flare-up	108.4±114.5	94.6±45.5	0.383
Immunosuppressants use	89 (72.4)	42 (42.9)	<0.001
Duration from first steroid to first immunosuppressant administration, mo	26.0±30.7	28.6±41.8	0.700
Anti-TNF-α therapy use	37 (30.1)	12 (12.2)	0.002
Duration from first corticosteroid to first anti-TNF-α administration, mo	59.2±40.1	64.9±50.5	0.689
Duration from first immunosuppressant to first anti-TNF-α administration, mo	40.6±36.8	40.2±39.5	0.971

Data are presented as number (%) or mean±SD.

TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α.

Fig. 3.

Cumulative probability of medication use. (A) Corticosteroid, (B) immunosuppressants, (C) anti-TNF-α.

TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; CD, Crohn’s disease.

Immunosuppressants (azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine) were administered to 89 patients (72.4%) with PCD and 57 (58.2%) with NPCD. The cumulative probabilities of immunosuppressant use were 10.6% after 1 year, 31.8% after 3 years, 45.5% after 5 years, 67.5% after 10 years, and 72.4% after 15 years among PCD patients and 7.1%, 18.4%, 28.6%, 38.8%, and 41.8%, respectively, among NPCD patients (Fig. 3). Details of clinical outcomes regarding immunosuppressant use are described in Table 2. The mean duration from corticosteroids to first immunosuppressant administration was 26.0±30.7 months in PCD and 28.6±41.8 months in NPCD (p=0.700).

Anti-TNF-α agents were used in 37 patients (30.1%) in PCD and 12 (12.2%) in NPCD (p<0.001). The cumulative frequency of anti-TNF-α use is shown in Fig. 3. Anti-TNF-α was used in no patients after 1 year, 4.9% after 3 years, 10.6% after 5 years, 23.6% after 10 years, and 29.3% after 15 years in PCD and in no patients, 1.0%, 2.0%, 8.2%, and 10.2%, respectively, in NPCD. Details of clinical outcomes regarding anti-TNF-α agents are shown in Table 2. The mean duration from first corticosteroids to first anti-TNF-α administration was 59.2±40.1 months in PCD and 64.9±50.5 months in NPCD (p=0.689). The mean duration from first immunosuppressant to first anti-TNF-α administration was 40.6±36.8 and 40.2±39.5 months in PCD and NPCD, respectively (p=0.971).

Forty-nine PCD patients (39.8%) and 50 NPCD patients (51.0%) underwent surgical treatment (p=0.097). Details are presented in Table 3. PCD patients underwent intestinal resection more than three times more frequently than NPCD patients (20.4% vs 8.0%, p=0.047) and had surgery more often for intestinal fistula or abscess, not counting procedures for anal abscesses (56.3% vs 24.7%, p=0.025). The cumulative rates of surgical intervention are shown in Fig. 4. Although surgical intervention was performed more frequently in NPCD patients than in PCD within 1 year of diagnosis, this modality was applied more frequently to PCD patients than NPCD patients thereafter. Ultimately, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients receiving surgical intervention between the two groups (39.8% vs 51.0%, p=0.097).

Table 3.

Detailed Clinical Outcomes of the Surgical Treatments and Hospitalizations

Variables for clinical outcomes	Patients with perianal lesions (n=123)	Patients without perianal lesions (n=98)	p-value
Surgical treatment			0.097
Yes/no	49 (39.8)/74 (60.2)	50 (51.0)/48 (49.0)
No. of surgical interventions			0.047
1	27 (55.1)	36 (72.0)
2	12 (24.5)	10 (20.0)
>2	10 (20.4)	4 (8.0)
Reason for surgery			0.025
Intestinal fistula or abscess	49 (52.7)	24 (33.3)
Obstruction or stricture	12 (12.9)	14 (19.4)
Perforation	19 (20.4)	13 (18.1)
Pain due to uncontrolled lesion	3 (3.2)	10 (13.9)
Other	10 (10.8)	11 (15.3)
Types of operation			0.022
Small bowel resection	33 (35.5)	30 (44.8)
Right hemicolectomy	22 (23.7)	22 (32.8)
Ileocecectomy	9 (9.7)	8 (11.9)
Other colectomy	27 (29.0)	5 (7.5)
Primary repair	2 (2.2)	2 (3.0)
Hospitalization			0.086
Yes/no	101 (82.1)/22 (17.9)	71 (72.4)/27 (27.6)
Among hospitalized patients (n=172)	101	71
No. of hospitalizations	4.6±4.8	3.2±2.9	0.016
Total days of hospitalization, day	54.9±70.9	42.4±58.6	0.226
Days per hospitalization, day	11.8±11.2	13.9±11.6	0.222
No. of hospitalizations due to perianal lesions	0.8±1.3	-	-
Total days of hospitalization due to perianal lesions, day	5.3±12.2	-	-

Data are presented as number (%) or mean±SD.

Fig. 4.

Cumulative probability of (A) surgical treatment and (B) hospitalization (not counting occasions directly related to perianal lesions).

CD, Crohn’s disease.

Hospitalization occurred at least once in 101 patients (82.1%) with PCD and 71 (72.4%) with NPCD (p=0.086). Details associated with hospitalization are summarized in Table 3. The mean frequency of hospitalization was higher in PCD than in NPCD (4.6±4.8 vs 3.2±2.9, p=0.016). There was no significant difference in total days of hospitalization or days per hospitalization between the two groups. Of patients with PCD, the mean frequency and total days of hospitalization related to perianal lesion were 0.8±1.3 and 5.3±12.2, respectively. The cumulative rates of hospitalization due to CD itself (leaving out cases directly associated with perianal lesions) are shown in Fig. 4.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we first demonstrated the detailed clinical patterns and long-term prognoses of PCD and NPCD in a Korean population across more than 10 years. Our study showed that perianal lesion occurred in 55.7% of CD patients (123/221), which makes it more prevalent in our study than in earlier Western studies. Previous studies have noted that race might be a factor for occurrence of perianal disease.^3,24 According to the literature, 14% to 37% of Western CD patients and 37% to 50% of Asian CD patients experienced perianal disease.^{15,16,24–29} Our results are thus consistent with previous findings that PCD is more common in Asian CD patients than in Western ones. Our data also revealed that perianal lesions were present before or at the diagnosis of CD in 37.2% of patients, and that the cumulative rate of PCD 13 years after diagnosis was 55.7%. Our data showed that, in about two-thirds of patients, PCD was the initial disease presentation, corresponding to an earlier study that found that 46% of PCD developed before diagnosis.¹⁵ We found no significant difference in several factors influencing the development of perianal disease (gender, extraintestinal symptoms, family history of IBD, and previous history of appendectomy), but age was an influential factor. Some of these findings were consistent with previous ones (gender^15,24 and family history of IBD³⁰). CD accompanied by extraintestinal symptoms was more prevalent in PCD than in NPCD (26.0% vs 16.3%), but that difference was not significant (p=0.083) in our data, which is dissimilar to the findings of a previous study.¹⁸ It was previously reported that younger age at diagnosis was associated with PCD.^3,10,24 Eglinton et al.¹⁰ found that the mean age at diagnosis was 8.1 years younger for PCD (30.0 years) than NPCD (38.1 years), while we found a difference of 6.9 years (23.4 years vs 30.3 years).

Previous studies of the relationship between CD behavior and perianal disease yielded varying results. Some studies reported that perianal disease represents a factor for complicated behavior such as penetrating and structuring disease.^10,24 Others found that PCD and complicated types had no association.^31,32 Our longitudinal observation demonstrated that the disease behavior at diagnosis did not differ significantly between PCD and NPCD. However, patients with PCD progressed more rapidly from inflammatory to complicated behavior over the course of the disease than those with NPCD. After 20 years, there was a pronounced difference in terms of disease behavior between the two groups. The proportions of B1, B2, and B3 in PCD changed from 57%, 25%, and 18%, respectively, at diagnosis to 27%, 15%, and 58% after 20 years, whereas those same proportions in NPCD changed from 59%, 21%, and 19% at diagnosis to 40%, 16%, and 44% 20 years later. In terms of disease location, we also found that colonic involvement was more common in PCD (79%) than in NPCD (67%), consistent with earlier published data, reinforcing the theory that PCD occurs less often in ileal CD and more often in CD that involves the colon.^15,33 In contrast to disease behavior, which changed dramatically, disease location was relatively stable and not significantly different between the disease types in the present study: only 13 PCD cases and 12 NPCD cases progressed to the ileocolonic category, similar to reports in previous studies.^4,7,28

It has been shown that patients with PCD experience a more severe luminal disease course and often require multiple surgical interventions and intensive medical therapies.^{7,9,10,17,19,34} We observed that patients with PCD had a significantly higher cumulative rate of administration of all medicines: corticosteroids, immunosuppressants such as azathioprine, and anti-TNF-α agents. The overall odds ratio in our study was 3.49 for corticosteroids, 3.49 for immunosuppressants, and 3.08 for anti-TNF-α agents. We found several notable points between PCD and NPCD in medical treatment. In the use of corticosteroids, even though disease flare-up events occurred more frequently in PCD than NPCD (3.3 vs 2.4, p=0.015), the difference in the number of days of corticosteroid administration per flare-up event was not significant (108 days vs 95 days, p=0.383). Thus, PCD might not be a predictive factor for corticosteroid dependency even though more patients with PCD took this drug. In immunosuppressant use, we found no difference in duration from first corticosteroid to first immunosuppressant use between PCD and NPCD (26.0 months vs 28.6 months, p=0.700). In anti-TNF-α use, there was no significant difference in either duration from first corticosteroids to first infliximab administration (59.2 months vs 64.9 months, p=0.689) or duration from first immunosuppressants to first infliximab administration (40.6 months vs 40.2 months, p=0.971). In other words, the step-up approach, a strategy for treating CD, did not progress more rapidly but only occurred more frequently in PCD than in NPCD.

Although there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients undergoing surgical treatment (not counting perianal-related operations) between PCD and NPCD in our results (40% vs 51%, p=0.097), the cumulative frequency of surgery was higher in NPCD than in PCD, especially within 1 year. Traditionally, PCD has been considered to carry a risk of bowel resection.¹⁵ Even though our finding about the early operation rate might be discordant with previous reports, we did find that multiple surgeries were performed more frequently in patients with PCD, similar to the findings of other studies.^18,35 We assume that the higher early surgical rate in NPCD patients resulted from the following two factors. First, a substantial portion of our patients with critical conditions presented with abdominal pain from intestinal stricture that went unrecognized before CD diagnosis, probably because CD is uncommon, so primary clinicians and patients were insufficiently aware of it until an emergency situation arose. Second, patients whose CD involves the terminal ileum are known to have a higher risk for needing surgery.^35,36 Given that, in our study population, NPCD patients had a much greater proportion of isolated ileal involvement, especially in the terminal ileum, than PCD patients, the higher early rate of bowel resection in NPCD could be also explained by disease location.

The present study has several limitations. First, many patients in our cohort were treated in the era before anti-TNF-α therapy became available. Thus, it was difficult to evaluate how the disease course was ameliorated by the role of anti-TNF-α therapy. Second, the retrospective nature and single-center study design could be vulnerable to selection bias. Third, there was no data dealing with clinical manifestation according to subtype of perianal lesion or perianal fistula (simple vs complex). Despite these limitations, our study has some strengths. We longitudinally monitored more than 10 years of quantifiable measures on disease course and detailed variables for multidisciplinary treatment modalities in comparing PCD and NPCD.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that patients with PCD were associated with younger age at diagnosis and more considerable changes in disease behavior to the structuring or penetrating types than patients with NPCD. In term of medical treatment, PCD patients were more likely to need corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and anti-TNF-α agents than NPCD patients. Whereas there were relatively similar rates in surgical interventions and hospitalizations between PCD and NPCD. These findings could help clinicians and researchers understand PCD as a distinct disease phenotype and pursue better targeted treatments for PCD patients.