Abstract
This study was to investigate the effect of corn naturally contaminated with aflatoxins (AF) under the regulatory level on the growth performance and health of nursery pigs, and the efficiency of yeast cell wall based feed additive (YC) mainly composed of β-glucans and mannan oligosaccharide (MOS) (Integral A+, Alltech, Lexington, KY) in prevention of mycotoxicosis. Pigs (60 barrows and 60 gilts at 6.02 ± 0.83 kg BW) were randomly allotted to 4 treatments in a randomized complete block design based on a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement with 10 pens (5 barrow and 5 gilt pens) per treatment and 3 pigs per pen. Pigs were fed experimental diets for 5 wk. First factor was AF (0 or 20 µg/kg in feed) and the second factor was YC (0 or 2 g/kg in feed). Feed intake and body weight were measured weekly, and blood samples were used to measure blood cell counts, immunoglobulin G (IgG), tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), oxidative damage status, and serological evaluation related to liver health. Aflatoxin decreased (P < 0.05) the number of platelet count (247.4 to 193.5 × 103/µL), and it also tended to increase the level of albumin (P = 0.055, 3.46 to 3.63 g/dL), albumin:globulin ratio (P = 0.050, 2.09 to 2.37), and Ca (P = 0.080, 10.79 to 10.97 mg/dL). Yeast cell wall based feed additive increased (P < 0.05) ADG (493 to 524 g/d), and ADFI (796 to 846 g/d) of pigs whereas G:F was not affected, and it also tended to increase (P = 0.055) albumin level (3.46 to 3.63 g/dL). Interactions (P < 0.05) on hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet count indicated that YC further increased their levels when pigs were eating AF contaminated feed. Interactions (P < 0.05) on urea nitrogen and blood urea N to creatinine ratio indicated that YC further decreased their levels when feed were contaminated with AF. In conclusion, low level of 20 µg AF/kg under the regulatory level had minor effects on hematology without affecting growth performance, however the supplementation of 2 g/kg YC as a source of β-glucans and MOS in feed can improve feed intake and therefore the growth of pigs.
Keywords: Aflatoxin, β-glucans, Health, MOS, Nursery pigs, modified yeast cell wall extract
1. Introduction
Corn is the most commonly used energy feed for pigs. However, corn is commonly contaminated with mycotoxins especially when corn is grown under high temperature and drought condition in breeding season and cool and damp condition in harvesting season (Binder et al., 2007, Chaytor et al., 2011a). Among 300 existing mycotoxins, aflatoxin (AF) is the only mycotoxin regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration (Dersjant-Li et al., 2003, Richard, 2007). Aflatoxin is also one of the most common mycotoxins found in foods processed for human consumption, such as corn, cotton seeds, nuts, peanuts, pistachios, spices, and dry fruits (CAST, 2003). Ingestion of AF by animals can result in many problems, including decreased growth rates, liver damage, immune suppression, and death (CAST, 2003). Pigs are one of the most susceptible commodity species to AF with damages to the gut and the liver (Hussein and Brasel, 2001, Weaver et al., 2013). Most countries limit AF concentration in the corn with different levels. The US is relatively more stringent on AF limitation which is 20 µg AF/kg in corn. The regulatory level for nursery pigs in US is also 20 µg AF/kg in corn whereas it is higher for finishing pigs and breeding pigs. Usually multiple mycotoxins are contaminated in corn and grains (Dersjant-Li et al., 2003). Contaminated corn used in this study also contained fumonisin (FUM). At the high level, FUM can damage the brain, lungs, kidneys, and liver (CAST, 2003).
The yeast cell wall based feed additive (YC) mainly containing β-glucans and mannan oligosaccharide (MOS) was used in this study and commercially available in the US (Kogan and Kocher, 2007, Ringot et al., 2005, Yiannikouris et al., 2004). Green algae are another component of YC which is a large group of algae that embryophytes are emerged. The green algae are classified into 6 clades, and 4 of them include the composition of β-glucans or MOS (Becker et al., 1991, Becker et al., 1994, Ciancia et al., 2012, Sørensen et al., 2011, Sørensen et al., 2012). β-glucans and MOS were shown to have binding capabilities to AF, deoxynivalenol (DON), and zearafenone (ZEA) (Huwig et al., 2001, Kogan and Kocher, 2007, Spring et al., 2000) and thus reducing the damaging effects of mycotoxins on pigs. In addition to the possible binding effects of β-glucans and MOS to mycotoxins, it is also shown that β-glucans can alter the balance of interleukin-1 and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist to reduce inflammatory cytokine production (Dritz et al., 1995) and MOS can alter the immune response by binding to mannose receptors on the macrophage cell surface which will enhance macrophage function (Davis et al., 2004).
The main hypothesis of this study was that growth and health of nursery pigs could minimally be affected by AF in the diets below the regulatory level and YC including β-glucans and MOS would help the growth and health of pigs fed these diets.
2. Materials and methods
The protocol for the use of animals in this study was approved by the North Carolina State University Animal Care and Use Committee.
2.1. Animals
One hundred twenty newly weaned pigs (60 gilts and 60 barrows, Smithfield Premium Genetics, Rose Hill, NC) had an acclimation period with phase 1 diet (Table 1) for 12 d. Pigs were then grouped based on their BW with a same sex and randomly allotted to 4 treatments based on a randomized complete block design with their BW and sex as blocks. Four treatments had 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. The first factor was AF (0 or 20 µg/kg in feed) and the second factor was YC (0 or 2 g/kg in feed). Each treatment had 10 pens (5 barrow pens and 5 gilt pens) with 3 pigs per pen. Pigs were fed experimental diets for 5 wk based on 2 phases (2 wk for phase 2 and 3 wk for phase 3; Table 1). Body weight and feed intake were measured weekly on d 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 for computation of growth performance.
Table 1.
Item | Phase 1 |
Phase 2 |
Phase 3 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No AF |
No AF |
AF |
No AF |
AF |
|||||
No YC | No YC | YC | No YC | YC | No YC | YC | No YC | YC | |
Ingredient, % | |||||||||
Yellow corn | 42.1 | 53.8 | 53.6 | 52.8 | 52.6 | 65.42 | 65.22 | 64.42 | 64.22 |
Soybean meal | 25 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
DairyLac 80 | 20 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | ||||
Blood plasma | 8 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | ||||
L-Lys HCl | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
DL-Met | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | ||||
Salt | 2 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Vitamin premix2 | 0.22 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
Mineral premix3 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
Dicalcium P | 0.15 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
Limeston, ground | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
poultry fat | 0.6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
YC | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||||
Corn AF4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
Calculated composition | |||||||||
DM, % | 91.3 | 90.5 | 90.5 | 90.5 | 90.5 | 89.8 | 89.8 | 89.8 | 89.8 |
ME, Mcal/kg | 3.45 | 3.42 | 3.42 | 3.42 | 3.42 | 3.42 | 3.42 | 3.42 | 3.42 |
CP, % | 22.4 | 21.1 | 21.1 | 21.1 | 21.1 | 19.7 | 19.7 | 19.7 | 19.7 |
Lys, % | 1.45 | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 1.15 |
Cys + Met, % | 0.84 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 |
Trp, % | 0.3 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 |
Thr, % | 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
Lactose sugar | 16 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 7.2 | ||||
Ca, % | 0.91 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
Available P, % | 0.56 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
Total P, % | 0.89 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 |
AF, µg/kg | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |||||
YC, % | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||||
Analyzed composition, % | |||||||||
DM | 92.7 | 91.6 | 91.4 | 91.6 | 91.8 | 90.5 | 91.1 | 90.4 | 90.5 |
CP | 21.5 | 20.2 | 19.6 | 21.8 | 19.5 | 19 | 20.3 | 18.6 | 18.6 |
ADF | 3.15 | 2.75 | 2.21 | 3.48 | 2.92 | 2.91 | 3.35 | 3.7 | 3.47 |
Ca | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.69 |
P | 0.86 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.63 |
AF5, µg/kg | 27 | 39 | 36 | 29 |
AF = aflatoxin; YC = yeast cell wall based feed additive; ADF = acid detergent fiber.
Factor AF with the presence of 20 µg AF/kg. Factor YC with the supplementation of 2 g Integral A+/kg (Integral A + was a product of Alltech, Lexington, KY).
Vitamin premix provided the following per kilogram of complete diet: 22,045,000 IU of vitamin A; 3,306,900 IU of vitamin D3; 66,138 IU of vitamin K; 88 mg of vitamin B12; 15,432 mg of riboflavin; 88,184 mg of niacin; 61,729 mg of d-pantothenic acid; 8,818 mg of menadione; 220 mg of biotin.
Mineral premix provided the following composition: 1.10% of Cu; 198.0 mg/kg of I; 11.02% of Fe; 2.64% of Mn; 198.4 mg/kg of Se; 11.02% of Zn.
Corn AF was corn naturally contaminated with 20 µg AF/kg and 1.6 mg fumonisin/kg.
Aflatoxin in diets were analyzed by a commercial laboratory (Food and Drug Protection Division Laboratory, NC).
2.2. Experimental diets
Corn contaminated with AF and FUM (Snow Hill, NC) was used to achieve targeted concentrations of each mycotoxin. Feeding period was separated into 3 phases. Phase 1 was the acclimation period. Corn contaminated with AF and FUM was used in phase 2 and 3 diets. Sampling of corn was completed by obtaining subsamples from 10 different locations to obtain accurate mycotoxins concentrations (Chaytor et al., 2011a, Munkvold et al., 2005, Whitaker et al., 2005). Yeast cell wall based feed additive (Integral A+, Alltech Inc., Nicholasville, KY) was added in phase 2 and 3 diets. Aflatoxin in corn was measured by North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Service Food and Drug Protection Division Laboratory. A detection limit was 0.1 µg/kg. The calculated value and analyzed value were showed in Table 1. During the 5 wk feeding period, all pigs had free access to feed and water. Concentrations of nutrients met the requirements suggested by NRC (1998).
2.3. Blood sampling
Blood samples were collected via jugular vein from one pig representing the average BW of each pen on d 31. For each pig, the blood sample was collected in 2 vacutainers (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ): one containing EDTA (7 mL) to obtain whole blood samples for hematological analysis, the other one without anticoagulant (10 mL) to collect serum for liver function test, immunoglobulin subset, cytokine, and oxidative damage status measurements. Plasma and serum samples were obtained after centrifugation (3,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C) and stored at −80°C until further analysis.
2.4. Hematological measurements and liver function test
Eosinophils, hematocrit, hemoglobin, lymphocytes, mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), monocytes, neutrophils, platelet count, red blood cell (RBC), and white blood cell (WBC) in plasma were determined using an automated hematology analyzer by a commercial laboratory (Antech Diagnostics, Cary, NC). Concentration of albumin to globulin ratio, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio, Ca, Cl, cholesterol, creatine phosphokinase, creatinine, globulin, glucose, P, K, Na, Na to K ratio, total bilirubin, total protein, and urea nitrogen in serum were measured for determination of liver function by the commercial laboratory (Antech Diagnostics, Cary, NC) using a chemistry-immuno analyzer (AU640e, Olympus America Inc., Center Valley, PA).
2.5. Immunoglobulin subset
Total concentration of the immunoglobulin subsets immunoglobulin G (IgG) in serum, as an indicator of general status of humoral immune system, was measured via commercial ELISA kits (Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX) as described (Chaytor et al., 2011b). Serum samples were diluted to 1:20,000 with 0.05% Tween 20. Further procedures were conducted following the manufacturer׳s instruction. Absorbance was read at 450 nm using an ELISA plate reader (Synergy HT Multi-Mode Microplate Reader, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT) and software (KC4 Data Analysis Software, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT). Samples were quantified against the standard curve constructed with known amounts of pig immunoglobulin subset. Detection limits were 7.8 to 500 ng/mL for IgG.
2.6. Cytokine measurement
Concentration of tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) in serum was measured using a Porcine TNF-a Colorimetric ELISA Kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL) as an indicator of systemic inflammation and acute phase reaction (Chaytor et al., 2011b). Briefly, 50 µL of standard plus dilute or 100 µL of sample was added to microplate wells which were already coated with capture antibody in conjunction with biotinylated antibody reagent. Detection occurred by the use of horseradish peroxidase, TMB substrate, and a stop solution of 0.18 M H2SO4. Absorbance was read at 450 and 540 nm by an ELISA plate reader and the KC4 data analysis software. Detection limit for TNF-a was 5 pg/mL.
2.7. Oxidative damage status measurement
Concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA) in serum was measured using an OxiSelect TBARS Assay Kit (Cell Biolabs, Inc., San Diego, CA) as an indicator of lipid peroxidation (Vahiquist and Duvic, 2007). Absorbance was read at 532 nm using the Synergy HT ELISA plate reader and KC4 data analysis.
2.8. Statistical analysis
This study used a randomized complete block design based on 2 × 2 factorial arrangements of treatments. Initial BW and sex were blocks. The first factor was AF (0 or 20 µg/kg) and the second factor was YC (0 or 2 g/kg). Pen was the experimental unit as pigs in a pen were group fed. Data were analyzed using the Mixed Model (PROC MIXED) of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). Probability values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant and probability between 0.05 and 0.10 were considered as trends.
3. Results
3.1. Growth performance
Initial BW of pigs did not differ among treatments. At the end of wk 1, BW of pigs did not differ among treatments (Table 2). From wk 2 to 5, the presence of AF did not affect the BW of pigs whereas the supplementation of YC increased (P < 0.05) BW.
Table 2.
Item | No AF |
AF |
SEM |
P-value |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No YC | YC | No YC | YC | AF | YC | Interaction | ||
BW, kg | ||||||||
Initial BW | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 0.3 | 0.788 | 0.993 | 0.979 |
Wk 1 BW | 7.6 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 7.8 | 0.3 | 0.731 | 0.189 | 0.189 |
Wk 2 BW | 10.6 | 10.9 | 10.7 | 11.2 | 0.5 | 0.306 | 0.036 | 0.509 |
Wk 3 BW | 13.8 | 14.5 | 14.1 | 14.7 | 0.6 | 0.401 | 0.025 | 0.977 |
Wk 4 BW | 18.2 | 19.0 | 18.5 | 19.1 | 0.7 | 0.615 | 0.039 | 0.714 |
Wk 5 BW | 23.1 | 24.3 | 23.5 | 24.4 | 0.9 | 0.563 | 0.007 | 0.668 |
ADG, g | ||||||||
Wk 1 | 221 | 221 | 199 | 260 | 26 | 0.721 | 0.184 | 0.185 |
Wk 2 | 430 | 473 | 464 | 481 | 21 | 0.134 | 0.034 | 0.374 |
Wk 1 to 2 | 326 | 347 | 331 | 371 | 20 | 0.298 | 0.034 | 0.506 |
Wk 3 | 464 | 511 | 486 | 495 | 21 | 0.847 | 0.085 | 0.220 |
Wk 4 | 621 | 650 | 629 | 626 | 27 | 0.620 | 0.430 | 0.318 |
Wk 5 | 700 | 762 | 714 | 763 | 25 | 0.664 | 0.004 | 0.736 |
Wk 3 to 5 | 595 | 641 | 610 | 628 | 21 | 0.935 | 0.009 | 0.232 |
Overall | 487 | 523 | 498 | 525 | 19 | 0.559 | 0.007 | 0.667 |
ADFI, g | ||||||||
Wk 1 | 425 | 411 | 402 | 491 | 27 | 0.146 | 0.060 | 0.012 |
Wk 2 | 591 | 618 | 604 | 632 | 27 | 0.491 | 0.159 | 0.995 |
Wk 1 to 2 | 508 | 515 | 503 | 561 | 24 | 0.177 | 0.040 | 0.100 |
Wk 3 | 717 | 806 | 762 | 800 | 35 | 0.373 | 0.007 | 0.250 |
Wk 4 | 985 | 1,051 | 1,018 | 1,023 | 49 | 0.939 | 0.216 | 0.273 |
Wk 5 | 1,225 | 1,315 | 1,226 | 1,316 | 47 | 0.966 | 0.005 | 0.989 |
Wk 3 to 5 | 976 | 1,057 | 1,002 | 1,046 | 40 | 0.715 | 0.006 | 0.370 |
Overall | 789 | 840 | 803 | 852 | 32 | 0.417 | 0.003 | 0.940 |
G:F | ||||||||
Wk 1 | 0.544 | 0.534 | 0.485 | 0.537 | 0.076 | 0.598 | 0.682 | 0.560 |
Wk 2 | 0.725 | 0.771 | 0.771 | 0.762 | 0.021 | 0.383 | 0.401 | 0.206 |
Wk 1 to 2 | 0.645 | 0.676 | 0.658 | 0.659 | 0.030 | 0.931 | 0.481 | 0.509 |
Wk 3 | 0.648 | 0.636 | 0.640 | 0.621 | 0.013 | 0.307 | 0.200 | 0.755 |
Wk 4 | 0.631 | 0.620 | 0.620 | 0.617 | 0.013 | 0.560 | 0.565 | 0.743 |
Wk 5 | 0.573 | 0.582 | 0.585 | 0.581 | 0.011 | 0.585 | 0.791 | 0.490 |
Wk 3 to 5 | 0.610 | 0.618 | 0.610 | 0.602 | 0.007 | 0.568 | 0.344 | 0.568 |
Overall | 0.619 | 0.625 | 0.622 | 0.615 | 0.008 | 0.666 | 0.966 | 0.376 |
AF = aflatoxin; YC = yeast cell wall based feed additive.
Factor AF with the presence of 20 µg AF/kg. Factor YC with the supplementation of 2 g Integral A+/kg.
Average daily gain was not affected by the presence of AF during the entire 5 wk feeding period. The supplementation of YC did not affect ADG at wk 1, 3, and 4. At wk 2 and 5, the supplementation of YC increased (P < 0.05) ADG. From wk 1 to 2, wk 3 to 5, and wk 1 to 5, the supplementation of YC increased (P < 0.05) ADG whereas the presence of AF did not affect ADG.
Average daily feed intake was not affected by the presence of AF during the entire 5 wk feeding period. The supplementation of YC did not affect ADFI at wk 2 and 4. The supplementation of YC tended to increase (P = 0.060) ADFI at wk 1. At wk 3 and 5, the supplementation of YC increased (P < 0.05) ADFI. From wk 1 to 2, wk 3 to 5, and wk 1 to 5, the supplementation of YC increased (P < 0.05) ADFI. Interaction in wk 1 ADFI between AF and YC existed (P < 0.05). The presence of YC decreased ADFI when feed were not contaminated with AF but increased ADFI when feed were contaminated with AF. The G:F did not differ among treatments during the entire 5 wk period.
3.2. Hematological measurements
The presence of AF decreased (P < 0.05) the number of platelet count. The interactions in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet count between AF and YC existed (P < 0.05). The presence of YC decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet count with no presence of AF but increased their levels with the presence of AF (Table 3).
Table 3.
Item | No AF |
AF |
SEM |
P-value |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No YC | YC | No YC | YC | AF | YC | Interaction | ||
Eosinophils, cell/µL | 402 | 476 | 416 | 491 | 96 | 0.843 | 0.321 | 0.996 |
Hematocrit, % | 39.9 | 38.1 | 37.7 | 40.5 | 1.2 | 0.880 | 0.642 | 0.045 |
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 12.2 | 11.6 | 11.6 | 12.4 | 0.3 | 0.837 | 0.685 | 0.045 |
Lymphocytes, cell/mL | 7,194 | 6,032 | 7,647 | 6,709 | 1,446 | 0.636 | 0.393 | 0.924 |
MCH, pg | 18.8 | 19.1 | 19.1 | 19.9 | 0.5 | 0.205 | 0.208 | 0.587 |
MCHC, g/dL | 30.5 | 30.5 | 30.7 | 30.5 | 0.3 | 0.714 | 0.639 | 0.733 |
MCV, fL | 61.6 | 62.7 | 62.7 | 65.2 | 1.7 | 0.252 | 0.246 | 0.652 |
Monocytes, cell/mL | 782 | 705 | 832 | 852 | 161 | 0.488 | 0.840 | 0.727 |
Neutrophils, cell/mL | 5,289 | 4,860 | 4,895 | 6,550 | 767 | 0.366 | 0.391 | 0.155 |
Platelet count, 103/µL | 268 | 227 | 172 | 215 | 32 | 0.011 | 0.957 | 0.035 |
RBC, 106/µL | 6.49 | 6.08 | 6.07 | 6.28 | 0.19 | 0.395 | 0.448 | 0.127 |
WBC, 103/µL | 13.8 | 12.0 | 14.1 | 14.7 | 2.1 | 0.434 | 0.756 | 0.518 |
AF = aflatoxin; YC = yeast cell wall based feed additive; WBC = white blood cells; RBC = red blood cells; MCV = mean corpuscular volume; MCH = mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC = mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration.
Factor AF with the presence of 20 µg AF/kg. Factor YC with the supplementation of 2 g Integral A+/kg.
3.3. Liver function
The albumin to globulin ratio, albumin level, and concentration of Ca tended to be increased (P = 0.050, P = 0.055, and P = 0.080, respectively) by the presence of AF. The supplementation of YC tended to increase (P = 0.055) albumin level. There were interaction (P < 0.05) in urea nitrogen and blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio between AF and YC. The presence of YC decreased urea nitrogen and blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio when feed were not contaminated with AF but increased their levels when feed were contaminated with AF. The interaction in albumin level between AF and YC tended to exist (P = 0.089). The increase in level of albumin with presence of YC was greater when feed were contaminated with AF compared with those without AF (Table 4).
Table 4.
Item | No AF |
AF |
SEM |
P-value |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No YC | YC | No YC | YC | AF | YC | Interaction | ||
A:G ratio | 2.10 | 2.07 | 2.23 | 2.51 | 0.23 | 0.050 | 0.377 | 0.275 |
Albumin, g/dL | 3.45 | 3.47 | 3.47 | 3.79 | 0.10 | 0.055 | 0.055 | 0.089 |
Alk phosphatase, U/L | 281 | 272 | 288 | 263 | 15 | 0.255 | 0.924 | 0.601 |
ALT, U/L | 26.3 | 28.7 | 26.1 | 28.6 | 2.2 | 0.944 | 0.261 | 0.982 |
AST, U/L | 30.7 | 30.3 | 27.5 | 28.9 | 2.2 | 0.277 | 0.811 | 0.668 |
BUN/creatinine ratio | 18.5 | 14.7 | 14.2 | 15.6 | 1.2 | 0.146 | 0.300 | 0.030 |
Ca, mg/dL | 10.7 | 10.9 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 0.1 | 0.080 | 0.485 | 0.425 |
Cl, mEq/L | 102 | 102 | 102 | 102 | 1. | 0.762 | 0.762 | 0.952 |
Cholesterol, mg/dL | 75.9 | 79.3 | 80.2 | 77.2 | 4.2 | 0.958 | 0.772 | 0.402 |
CPK, U/L | 1,112 | 1,177 | 943 | 1,311 | 245 | 0.944 | 0.383 | 0.539 |
Creatinine, mg/dL | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.03 | 0.459 | 0.459 | 0.710 |
Globulin, g/dL | 1.69 | 1.71 | 1.67 | 1.55 | 0.92 | 0.292 | 0.364 | 0.302 |
Glucose, mg/dL | 133 | 124 | 124 | 124 | 6 | 0.407 | 0.407 | 0.447 |
K, mEq/L | 5.71 | 5.68 | 5.50 | 5.59 | 0.63 | 0.304 | 0.836 | 0.679 |
Na, mEq/L | 143 | 144 | 144 | 143 | 1 | 0.741 | 0.741 | 0.324 |
Na:K ratio | 25.7 | 26.0 | 26.8 | 26.2 | 3.2 | 0.263 | 0.794 | 0.436 |
P, mg/dL | 11.0 | 11.0 | 10.7 | 10.8 | 0.5 | 0.716 | 0.790 | 0.484 |
Total bilirubin, mg/dL | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.326 | 0.326 | 0.326 |
Total protein, g/dL | 5.14 | 5.18 | 5.14 | 5.34 | 0.09 | 0.380 | 0.192 | 0.380 |
Urea nitrogen, mg/dL | 12.6 | 9.5 | 9.9 | 10.6 | 0.8 | 0.288 | 0.116 | 0.016 |
AF = aflatoxin; YC = yeast cell wall based feed additive; A/G ratio = albumin to globulin ratio; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; Alk phosphatase = alkaline phosphatase; BUN/creatinine ratio = blood urea N to creatinine ratio; CPK = creatine phosphokinase.
Factor AF with the presence of 20 µg AF/kg. Factor YC with the supplementation of 2 g Integral A+/kg.
3.4. Cytokines
The levels of IgG, MDA, and TNF-a in serum did not differ among treatments (Table 5).
Table 5.
Item | No AF |
AF |
SEM |
P-value |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No YC | YC | No YC | Yes YC | AF | YC | Interaction | ||
TNF-a, pg/mL | 59.1 | 61.6 | 64.2 | 57.8 | 7.0 | 0.896 | 0.664 | 0.324 |
IgG, mg/mL | 8.60 | 10.74 | 11.47 | 9.64 | 2.04 | 0.621 | 0.928 | 0.271 |
MDA, µmol/L | 15.43 | 14.60 | 16.81 | 16.02 | 1.75 | 0.394 | 0.621 | 0.992 |
AF = aflatoxin; YC = yeast cell wall based feed additive; TNF-a = tumor necrosis factor-a; IgG = immunoglobulin G; MDA = malondialdehyde.
Factor AF with the presence of 20 µg AF/kg. Factor YC with the supplementation of 2 g Integral A+/kg.
4. Discussion
Aflatoxin is one of the most common mycotoxins found in feedstuffs such as corn, barley, and wheat (Chaytor et al., 2011a). Feed contaminated with AF can cause liver damage and immune suppression, decrease feed intake and weight gain, and eventually cause significant economic losses (Chaytor et al., 2011b, Weaver et al., 2013).
Swine are highly susceptible to AF compared with other species. The regulatory level for nursery pigs in complete feedstuffs is 20 µg AF/kg in US (FAO Food and Nutrition Paper No. 81, 2004). Numerous studies in swine observed decreased BW when diets contained 60 to 3,000 µg AF/kg (Chaytor et al., 2011b, Harvey et al., 1989, Marin et al., 2002, Thieu et al., 2008). The effects of AF on pigs are still questioned when reducing the concentration below 20 µg AF/kg. The other objective was to determine the effects of mycotoxin in naturally contaminated corn instead of purified form of mycotoxins contaminated corn on growth and health of pigs. Studying on a purified form of mycotoxin can be an accurate way to evaluate the effects of individual mycotoxin on performance of animals. However, grains are usually contaminated with more than one kind of mycotoxin. Corn used in this study contained AF and FUM. The concentration of FUM in the diet was 1.6 mg FUM/kg. Previous studies showed that less than 5 mg FUM/kg did not cause liver damage in swine (Zomborszky et al., 2000), suggesting FUM as low as 1.6 mg FUM/kg would not have negative effects on growth performance, gut health, and liver function in current study.
Modified yeast cell wall extract may have effects on preventing minor health concerns in nursery pigs fed diet containing 20 µg AF/kg. The 3 major components of YC are β-glucans, MOS, and green algae. In previous studies, nursery pigs fed diets supplemented with 0.025% β-glucans had increased growth performance, which was due to the increased ADFI (Dritz et al., 1995). Supplementation of 0.03% β-glucans tended to increase feed intake but did not affect feed efficiency (Hiss and Sauerwein, 2003). Schoenherr et al. (1994) suggested that the optimal inclusion level of β-glucans was between 0.025 and 0.05% throughout the nursery period. The supplementation of MOS enhanced growth performance and feed efficiency of nursery pigs (Davis et al., 2002, LeMieux et al., 2001, Rozeboom et al., 2005). Another study found that a-D-mannan could suppress toxic activity of mycotoxins probably by interacting with their toxic radical metabolites (Madrigal-Bujaidar et al., 2002).
During the entire experimental period, pigs fed 20 µg AF/kg did not have significant difference in ADG and ADFI compared with pigs fed no AF. These results are different from what previous studies found, which is mainly because current study used much lower concentration of AF (20 µg AF/kg). Chaytor et al. (2011b) found that weight gain and feed intake decreased by 17.3 and 11.5%, respectively, when pigs fed 124 µg AF/kg diet. However, the diet with 60 to 130 µg AF/kg did not affect the feed efficiency (Chaytor et al., 2011b, Döll et al., 2003), which is consistent with our finding. Therefore, 20 µg AF/kg of diet was not high enough to affect growth of nursery pigs.
Supplementation of YC increased pigs BW from wk 2 to 5 and at the end of this study by 5.2 and 3.8%, respectively. At the same periods, ADG increased with the supplementation of YC by 7.3 and 5.4%, respectively. Increases in BW and ADG are mainly caused by the increased ADFI. These results were supported by previous studies (Dvorak and Jacques, 1998, Li et al., 2006, Miguel et al., 2002, Zhao et al., 2012). Li et al. (2006) observed that β-glucans from Saccharomyces cerevisiae improved ADG of nursery pigs with the concentration of 0.005%, which is much lower than inclusion levels of 0.025 to 0.05% used in study of Schoenherr et al. (1994) and Shen et al. (2009). The difference in inclusion levels may indicate that the effective range of β-glucans varies with different sources. Miguel et al. (2002) claimed that the application of MOS as a growth promoter in early nursery period has been demonstrated. During the entire experimental period, G:F was not affected by the supplementation of YC. According to the previous studies, MOS could improve feed efficiency whereas β-glucans did not affect feed efficiency (Hiss and Sauerwein, 2003, Miguel et al., 2002, Rozeboom et al., 2005). Therefore, further study is required to investigate the contradictory effects of MOS and β-glucans on feed efficiency.
Even concentration of 20 µg AF/kg was not high enough to affect growth of nursery pigs, hematological, serological variables, inflammatory status, and oxidative status were determined to evaluate the effect of AF on health of pigs. Platelet count was the only one hematological parameter decreased with the presence of AF. With limited information available concerning the hematological and biochemical effects of low level AF exposure, few information about platelet count were mentioned in previous study. Chaytor et al., 2011a, Chaytor et al., 2011b reported that there was a numerical decrease in platelet count when nursery pigs were fed diets contaminated with combination of AF and DON. Mycotoxin T-2 toxin was able to inhibit platelet activity with an additive inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation response (Gentry et al., 1987). The decreased platelet number in this study may indicate the negative effect of AF on platelet activity.
Serological variables were slightly affected by AF and YC, which was similar to the hematological parameters. Consistent with current result, albumin to globulin ratio increased with supplementation of low level of FUM (Rotter et al., 1994). The increase of albumin level can be explained by inadequate water intake which may cause dehydration of blood and subsequently increases albumin concentration (Kaneko et al., 1997). Khera et al. (1984) reported that there was a decrease in water intake when mice were exposed to feed containing DON. However, considering these variables were within the normal ranges, the alterations in liver function caused by low level of AF was too slight to generate change in growth performance of nursery pigs, as the previous results indicated.
The supplementation of YC and presence of AF did not affect TNF-a, IgG, and MDA in this study. These results were similar to some previous studies with low concentration of mycotoxins. Marin et al. (2002) concluded that concentration of TNF-a did not change when providing dietary AF at 140 or 280 µg/kg Accensi et al. (2006) found that DON at level from 280 to 840 µg/kg did not affect IgG concentration. T-2 toxin at levels from 540 to 2,102 µg/kg and AF at level of 500 µg/kg did not change MDA concentration of nursery pigs (Harper et al., 2010, Meissonnier et al., 2008).
5. Conclusion
Collectively, based on the results of this study, the supplementation of 20 µg AF/kg did not affect pigs׳ growth performance. However, it had negative effects on platelet count, serum albumin, and calcium homeostasis. Supplementation of modified yeast cell wall extract mainly composed of β-glucans and MOS increased ADG of pigs by increasing ADFI, but did not affect the feed efficiency. Mechanisms on increased feed intake by β-glucans and MOS combination or individually warrant further research.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge financial supports from Alltech (Lexington, KY) and technical supports from Dr. Alexandros Yiannikouris.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine.
References
- Accensi F., Pinton P., Callu P., Abella–Bourges N., Guelfi J.-F., Grosjean F. Ingestion of low doses of deoxynivalenol does not affect hematological, biochemical, or immune responses of piglets. J Anim Sci. 2006;84:1935–1942. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Becker B., Becker D., Kamerling J.P., Melkonian M. 2–Keto– sugar acids in green flagellates: a chemical marker for prasinophycean scales. J Phycol. 1991;27:498–504. [Google Scholar]
- Becker B., Marin B., Melkonian M. Structure, composition, and biogenesis of prasinophyte cell coverings. Protoplasma. 1994;181:233–244. [Google Scholar]
- Binder E.M., Tan L.M., Chin L.J., Handl J., Richard J. Worldwide occurrence of mycotoxins in commodities, feeds and feed ingredients. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2007;137:265–282. [Google Scholar]
- CAST . 2003. Mycotoxins: risks in plant, animal, and human systems. Council for agric sci technol task force report No. 139. Ames, IA. [Google Scholar]
- Chaytor A.C., Hansen J.A., van Heugten E., See M.T., Kim S.W. Occurrence and decontamination of mycotoxins in swine feed. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci. 2011;24:723–738. [Google Scholar]
- Chaytor A.C., See M.T., Hansen J.A., de Souza A.L.P., Middleton T.F., Kim S.W. Effects of chronic exposure of diets with reduced concentrations of aflatoxin and deoxynivalenol on growth and immune status of pigs. J Anim Sci. 2011;89:124–135. doi: 10.2527/jas.2010-3005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ciancia M., Alberghina J., Arata P.X., Benavides H., Leliaert F., Verbruggen H. Characterization of cell wall polysaccharides of the coenocytic green seaweed Bryopsis plumosa (Bryopsidaceae, Chlorophyta) from the Argentinecoast. J Phycol. 2012;48:326–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01131.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis M.E., Maxwell C.V., Brown D.C., De Rodas B.Z., Johnson Z.B., Kegley E.B. Effect of dietary mannan oligosaccharides and (or) pharmacological additions of copper sulfate on growth performance and immunocompetence of weanling and growing/finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2002;80:2887–2894. doi: 10.2527/2002.80112887x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis M.E., Maxwell C.V., Erf G.F., Brown D.C., Wistuba T.J. Dietary supplementation with phosphorylated mannans improves growth response and modulates immune function of weanling pigs. J Anim Sci. 2004;82:1882–1891. doi: 10.2527/2004.8261882x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dersjant-Li Y., Verstegen M.W.A., Gerrits W.J.J. The impact of low concentrations of aflatoxin, deoxynivalenol or fumonisin in diets on growing pigs and poultry. Nutr Res Rev. 2003;16:223–239. doi: 10.1079/NRR200368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Döll S., Da Nicke S., Ueberschar K.H., Valenta H., Schnurrbusch U., Ganter M. Effects of graded levels of Fusarium toxin contaminated maize in diets for female weaned piglets. Arch Anim Nutr. 2003;57:311–334. doi: 10.1080/00039420310001607680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dritz S.S., Shi J., Kielian T.L., Goodband R.D., Nelssen J.L., Tokach M.D. Influence of dietary β-glucan on growth performance, nonspecific immunity, and resistance to Streptococcus suis infection in weanling pigs. J Anim Sci. 1995;73:3341–3350. doi: 10.2527/1995.73113341x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dvorak R., Jacques K.A. Mannanoligosaccharide, fructooligosaccharide, and carbadox for pigs days 0-21 post-weaning. J Anim Sci. 1998;76(Suppl. 2):64. (Abstr.) [Google Scholar]
- Gentry P.A., Ross M.L., Bondy G.S. Inhibitory effect of trichothecene mycotoxins on bovine platelets stimulated by platelet activating factor. Can J Vet Res. 1987;51:490–494. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harper A.F., Estienne M.J., Blair Meldrum J., Harrell R.J., Diaz D.E. Assessment of a hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate agent and antioxidant blend for mitigation of aflatoxin-induced physiological alterations in pigs. J Swine Health Prod. 2010;18:282–289. [Google Scholar]
- Harvey R.B., Kubena L.F., Huff W.E., Corrier D.E., Clark D.E., Phillips T.D. Effects of aflatoxin, deoxynivalenol, and their combinations in the diets of growing pigs. Am J Vet Res. 1989;50:602–607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hiss S., Sauerwein H. Influence of dietary β-glucan on growth performance, lymphocyte proliferation, specific immune response and haptoglobin plasma concentrations in pigs. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2003;87:2–11. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0396.2003.00376.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hussein H.S., Brasel J.M. Toxicity, metabolism, and impact of mycotoxins on humans and animals. Toxocol. 2001;167:101–134. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(01)00471-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huwig A., Freimund S., Kappeli O., Dutler H. Mycotoxin detoxification of animal feed by different absorbents. Toxicol Lett. 2001;122:179–188. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(01)00360-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaneko J.J., Harvey J.W., Bruss M. Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals. 5th ed. Academic Press; San Diego: 1997. Serum proteins and the dysproteinemias; pp. 117–137. [Google Scholar]
- Khera K.S., Arnold D.L., Whalen C., Anger G., Scott P.M. Vomitoxin (4-deoxynivalenol): effect on reproduction of mice and rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1984;74:345–356. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(84)90288-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kogan G., Kocher A. Role of yeast cell wall polysaccharides in pig nutrition and health protection. Livest Sci. 2007;109:161–165. [Google Scholar]
- LeMieux F.M., Southern L.L., Bidner T.D. Effect of a mannan oligosaccharide on growth of nursery pigs. J Anim Sci. 2001;79(Suppl. 2):72. (Abstr.) [Google Scholar]
- Li J., Li D.F., Xing J.J., Cheng Z.B., Lai C.H. Effects of β-glucan extracted from Sacharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance, and immunological and somatotropic responses of pigs challenged with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. J Anim Sci. 2006;84:2374–2381. doi: 10.2527/jas.2004-541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madrigal-Bujaidar E., Madrigal-Santillán E., Pages N., Kogan G., Chamorro G. Antigenotoxic studies in mouse to reduce the aflatoxin B1 damage. In: Goudey-Perriere F., Bon C., Puiseux-Dao S., Sauviat M.-P., editors. Toxines et recherches biomedicales. Elsevier; Paris: 2002. pp. 123–132. (in French) ISBN : 2-84299-445-0. [Google Scholar]
- Marin D.E., Taranu I., Bunaciu R.P., Pascale F., Tudor D.S., Avram N. Changes in performance, blood parameters, humoral and cellular immune responses in weanling piglets exposed to low doses of aflatoxin. J Anim Sci. 2002;80:1250–1257. doi: 10.2527/2002.8051250x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meissonnier G.M., Laffitte J., Raymond I., Benoit E., Cossalter A.-M., Pinton P. Subclinical doses of T-2 toxin impair acquired immune response and liver cytochrome P450 in pigs. Toxicol. 2008;247:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miguel J.C., Rodriguez-Zas S.L., Pettigrew J.E. Proc. alltech׳s 18th annu. symp. Nottingham Univ. Press; Nottingham, UK: 2002. Practical effects of Bio-Mos in nursery pig diets: a meta-analysis. In nutritional biotechnology in the feed and food industry; pp. 425–433. [Google Scholar]
- Munkvold G., Hurburgh C., Meyer J. Iowa State University Extension; Ames, IA. US: 2005. Aflatoxins in corn. [Google Scholar]
- Richard J.L. Some major mycotoxins and their mycotoxicoses: an overview. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;119:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ringot D., Lerzy B., Bonhoure J.P., Auclair E., Oriol E., Larondelle Y. Effect of temperature on in vitro ochratoxin A biosorption onto yeast cell wall derivatives. Proc Biochem. 2005;40:3008–3016. [Google Scholar]
- Rotter B.A., Thompson B.K., Lessard M., Trenholm H.L., Tryphona H. Influence of low-level exposure to Fusarium mycotoxins on selected immunological and hematological parameters in young swine. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1994;23:117–124. doi: 10.1006/faat.1994.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rozeboom D.W., Shaw D.T., Tempelman R.J., Miguel J.C., Pettigrew J.E., Connolly A. Effects of mannan oligosaccharide and an antimicrobial product in nursery diets on performance of pigs reared on three different farms. J Anim Sci. 2005;83:2637–2644. doi: 10.2527/2005.83112637x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schoenherr W.D., Pollmann D.S., Coalson J.A. Titration of MacroGardTM-Son growth performance of nursery pigs. J Anim Sci. 1994;72(Suppl. 2):57. (Abstr.) [Google Scholar]
- Shen Y.B., Piao X.S., Kim S.W., Wang L., Liu P., Yoon I. Effects of yeast culture supplementation on growth performance, intestinal health, and immune response of nursery pigs. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:2614–2624. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sørensen I., Pettolino F.A., Bacic A., Ralph J., Lu F., O׳Neill M.A. The Charophycean green algae provide insights into early origin of plant cell walls. Plant J. 2011;153:366–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04686.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sørensen I., Rose J.K.C., Doyle J.J., Domozych D.S., Willats W.G.T. The Charophycean green algae as model systems to study plant cell walls and other evolutionary adaptations that gave rise to land plant. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7:1–3. doi: 10.4161/psb.7.1.18574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spring P., Wenk C., Dawson K.A., Newman K.E. The effects of dietary mannanoligosaccharides on cecal parameters and the concentrations of enteric bacteria in the ceca of salmonella-challenged broiler chicks. Poult Sci. 2000;79:205–211. doi: 10.1093/ps/79.2.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thieu N.Q., Ogle B., Pettersson H. Efficacy of bentonite clay in ameliorating aflatoxicosis in piglets fed aflatoxin contaminated diets. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2008;40:649–656. doi: 10.1007/s11250-008-9144-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vahiquist A., Duvic M. Retinoids and carotenoids in dermatology. In: Yeum K.J., Krinsky N.I., editors. Antioxidative effects of carotenoids. CRC Press; Boca Raton, US: 2007. pp. 271–290. [Google Scholar]
- Weaver A.C., See M.T., Hansen J.A., Kim Y.B., de Souza A.L.P., Middleton T.F. The use of feed additives to reduce the effects of aflatoxin and deoxynivalenol on pig growth, organ health, and immune status during chronic exposure. Toxins. 2013;5:1261–1281. doi: 10.3390/toxins5071261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitaker T.B., Slate A.B., Johansson A.S. Sampling feeds for mycotoxin analysis. In: Durate D., editor. In the mycotoxin blue book. Nottingham University Press; Bath, UK: 2005. pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- Yiannikouris A., Bertin G., Jeminet G., Jouany J.P., Francois J., Poughon L. Adsorption of zearalenone by β-D-glucans in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. J Food Prot. 2004;67:1195–1200. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.6.1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao P.Y., Jung J.H., Kim I.H. Effect of mannan oligosaccharides and fructan on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profile, and diarrhea score in weanling pigs. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:833–839. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-3921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zomborszky M.K., Vetesi F., Repa I., Kovacs F., Bata A., Horn P. Experiment to determine limits of tolerance for fumonisin b1 in weaned piglets. J Vet Med B. 2000;47:277–286. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2000.00343.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]